The Difference in Between Sramana and Brahmana Tradition

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

I

Compose and contest the two traditions of Sramana and Brahmana

The two systems of religious traditions namely, Sramana and Brahmana had been exist in
India at the time of the Buddha around 6 th century B.C. They are opposing and influencing to
each other. Very often the influences are mutual and repeated. By putting the two in
comparison we will come to know the differences lying between them. In doing so, first, I
will introduce the Brahamana, and Sramana later.

The special features, characteristic of Brahmana tradition are the consideration of the Vadas.
The Vedas are considered as powerful or Authority. Brahmana traditions were founded on
Vrana Dhrama and Asrama, which mean belief in the four Castes as followings
: (1) Brahmana (2) Ksatriya
(3) Vaisa and (4) Sudra.

Therefore if anyone does not belong to one of these four castes he or she is not regarded as
human beings. The Brhamanas are considered as the most superior among the casts because
they were born from the mouth of Maha Brahma.

The important thing in Brahmana tradition is to sacrifice a large number of animals to the
God in order to connect with relationship who were in heaven and to get the blessing of the
god to fulfill their needs. It means the sacrifice Yama and transmigrating of merit to the soul
of relationship is very popular in Brahamana tradition.

Women were not considered equal freedom in society. They were limited to the houses in
order to look after the house and serve their husband. There is nothing more. From the above
mentioned, we can understand the ideas of Brahmana. They have one philosophy or one text;
they proclaimed themselves as the creators or the God who live on the earth (Bhudeva). They
accept invitation, and they belong to the groups who practice. These all are generally
characteristic of Brhamana Tradition.
Sramana tradition
The Sramana tradition is normally opposite of Brahmana tradition. They do not regard Vedas
as authority. Sramana tradition did not recognize the superiority of Brahmin. While rejecting
the Supreme god, divine the scarifying of God the Saramana accepted the ascetic and the
practice in the forest. In Saramana tradition there were several religious teachers and they had
some different views.

Most of them were believing in materialistic and the idea of soul but some teachers like
Jainas were believed in past of Kamma. The Buddha also belonged to the Saramana tradition.
But the teachings of the Buddha are so different from the other teachers of Saramana
tradition.

Women were given a better life under Sramna tradition. They were allowed to enter into
ordination like Bhikkhuni sasana. They were able to renounce the householder life under the
Sramana tradition. In the Bramana tradition women were regarded as servants of men, but in
the Sramana they were able to fine the truth or the way for liberation.

In conclusion, we can assume that the similarity of the two traditions that both of them have
rather the same ground of philosophy and each of them practice for the interest in getting
happiness but in different concept. Especially, they both believed in transmigration in the
same form; either of the soul or of a stream of consciousness fro ma dying body to a newly
conceived one. (544)

You might also like