B. S. Brar et al. developed a hybrid ECM-AFM process to finish internal holes and slots. By applying a low voltage between an electrolyte-abrasive flooded workpiece and a prismatic cathode, material is removed through both anodic dissolution and abrasion, increasing the material removal rate. Experiments showed the removal rate increased with voltage and the surface roughness improved by 87.43% to 0.49 μm from 4.02 μm.
Silva Neto created an ECM prototype using a motor-driven tool. Experiments using steel workpieces and copper tools in NaCl and NaNO3 electrolytes found that the removal rate initially increased with feed rate until reaching a maximum, and was higher
B. S. Brar et al. developed a hybrid ECM-AFM process to finish internal holes and slots. By applying a low voltage between an electrolyte-abrasive flooded workpiece and a prismatic cathode, material is removed through both anodic dissolution and abrasion, increasing the material removal rate. Experiments showed the removal rate increased with voltage and the surface roughness improved by 87.43% to 0.49 μm from 4.02 μm.
Silva Neto created an ECM prototype using a motor-driven tool. Experiments using steel workpieces and copper tools in NaCl and NaNO3 electrolytes found that the removal rate initially increased with feed rate until reaching a maximum, and was higher
B. S. Brar et al. developed a hybrid ECM-AFM process to finish internal holes and slots. By applying a low voltage between an electrolyte-abrasive flooded workpiece and a prismatic cathode, material is removed through both anodic dissolution and abrasion, increasing the material removal rate. Experiments showed the removal rate increased with voltage and the surface roughness improved by 87.43% to 0.49 μm from 4.02 μm.
Silva Neto created an ECM prototype using a motor-driven tool. Experiments using steel workpieces and copper tools in NaCl and NaNO3 electrolytes found that the removal rate initially increased with feed rate until reaching a maximum, and was higher
B. S. Brar et al. developed a hybrid ECM-AFM process to finish internal holes and slots. By applying a low voltage between an electrolyte-abrasive flooded workpiece and a prismatic cathode, material is removed through both anodic dissolution and abrasion, increasing the material removal rate. Experiments showed the removal rate increased with voltage and the surface roughness improved by 87.43% to 0.49 μm from 4.02 μm.
Silva Neto created an ECM prototype using a motor-driven tool. Experiments using steel workpieces and copper tools in NaCl and NaNO3 electrolytes found that the removal rate initially increased with feed rate until reaching a maximum, and was higher
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
B. S. Brar et al.
[1] have discussed about developing a hybrid process
of Electrochemical machining(ECM) and abrasive flow machining(AFM) for finishing internal holes/slots or cavities having prismatic sections. He achieved finishing on work piece by applying low voltage DC supply across electrolyte-abrasive laden media flooded gap and prismatic rod as cathode and work piece as anode. By this material removal rate(MRR) was increased because of material removed by both controlled anodic dissolution(ECM) at atomic level and abrasive machining. He conducted experiments by taking work piece of yellow brass ( 65% Cu, 35% Zn, 156BHN hardness) and observed that MRR increases with increase in supply voltage. An improvement of 87.43% in surface roughness(∆R a) was observed at 10V with final surface roughness value of 0.49 µm from 4.02 µm. The limitation of this process is it can only be applied to prismatic geometries because of cathode-electrode requirement along with anode-work piece.
Silva Neto et al. [2] have developed an electro chemical machining
(ECM) prototype in laboratory using simple components in which coupled motor rotation in tools reducer determines the feed rate. He conducted experiments by taking work piece made of SAE-XEV-S valve steel and tool made up of electrolytic copper. The experiment was carried out using two different electrolytes, they are sodium chloride electrolyte with concentration 100 g/l ,and sodium nitride with concentration of 250 g/l at flow rate of 300 L/hr . He studied relation between different process parameters and concluded that as feed rate increases the material removal rate increases up to certain time and also as feed rate increases gap between tool and work piece continuously reduced. And also he found that MRR is affected by the type of electrolyte and MRR is more with NaCl electrolyte because of its higher current efficiency. Claudia Richter et al.[3] studied on application of Electrochemical Polishing(ECP) for polishing complex 3D micro devices manufactured using µEDM process. He stated that instead of obtaining better surface properties by optimising process parameters in µEDM process, it is desirable to improve surface properties using ECP. To study about parameters affecting surface properties he used two electrolyte solutions, they are H3Po4(85%) and H2So4(90%) with two volume ratios 3:2 and 2:1. He conducted experiments on straight micro channels made of Stainless steel (X10CrNi18-8) along with effect of glycerol in electrolyte. He concluded that the surface roughness of Ra,EP=(22.14 ±1.25)nm is achieved from Ra,EDM=(94.92 ±0.99)nm at I=600 mA , 3:2 volume ratio of H3Po4 and H2So4 and glycerol volume content of 20%. This is 90% improvement compared to the results of µEDM process.
J.C.Fang et al.[4] reported that the finishing efficiency of
electrochemical polishing can be increased by application of magnetic field. He conducted experiment with acidic electrolyte, steel work piece and copper cathode at 70oC.He studied effect on efficiency, material removal rate and surface roughness by application of magnetic field. He concluded that application of magnetic field has more effect on rough surfaces compared to smooth surfaces and finishing efficiency is increased. He reported that magnetic field alters electrochemical reactions and increases inter electrode current density because of which material removal rate increases. So for magnetic electrochemical polishing optimum matching principal parameters (like magnetic intensity, voltage, gap) should be selected for better results. References: [1] B.S.Brar , R.S.Walia , V.P.Singh , “Electrochemical-aided abrasive flow machining (ECA2FM) process:a hubrid machining process” , Int J Adv Manuf Technol , DOI:10.1007/s00170-015-6806-y [2] Silva Neto , Joao Cirilo da , “Development of a prototype of electrochemical machining” ,Advanced Materials Research Vol 223 (2011) pp 940-949 [3] Claudia richter ,Thomas Krah , Stephanus Buttgenbach “Novel 3D manufacturing method combining microelectrical discharge machining and electrochemical polishing” ,Microsyst technol(2012) 18:1109-1118 [4] J.C.Fang , Z.J.Jin , W.J.Xu , Y.Y.Shi “Magnetic electrochemical finishing machining” , Journal of materials processing technology 129(2002) 283-287