Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 31 views

    4597 AAB SC 07 Addendum 2 R0v0 43

    Uploaded by

    danieldumapit
    The document analyzes the flexural strength of a rolled rectangular hollow section (RHS) beam subjected to bending about its minor axis. It performs local and global buckling analyses on the beam's elements according to design code requirements. The local buckling analysis finds the web to be non-compact while the flange is compact. The nominal flexural strength is taken as the minimum of the strengths from yielding and local buckling of the elements. No lateral torsional buckling analysis is provided by the code. The document concludes with the nominal flexural strength of the RHS beam.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    4597 AAB SC 07 Addendum 2 R0v0 43

    Uploaded by

    danieldumapit
    31 views1 page
    The document analyzes the flexural strength of a rolled rectangular hollow section (RHS) beam subjected to bending about its minor axis. It performs local and global buckling analyses on the beam's elements according to design code requirements. The local buckling analysis finds the web to be non-compact while the flange is compact. The nominal flexural strength is taken as the minimum of the strengths from yielding and local buckling of the elements. No lateral torsional buckling analysis is provided by the code. The document concludes with the nominal flexural strength of the RHS beam.

    Original Description:

    FT-11

    Original Title

    4597‐AAB‐SC‐07 Addendum 2 R0v0 43

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document analyzes the flexural strength of a rolled rectangular hollow section (RHS) beam subjected to bending about its minor axis. It performs local and global buckling analyses on the beam's elements according to design code requirements. The local buckling analysis finds the web to be non-compact while the flange is compact. The nominal flexural strength is taken as the minimum of the strengths from yielding and local buckling of the elements. No lateral torsional buckling analysis is provided by the code. The document concludes with the nominal flexural strength of the RHS beam.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    31 views1 page

    4597 AAB SC 07 Addendum 2 R0v0 43

    Uploaded by

    danieldumapit
    The document analyzes the flexural strength of a rolled rectangular hollow section (RHS) beam subjected to bending about its minor axis. It performs local and global buckling analyses on the beam's elements according to design code requirements. The local buckling analysis finds the web to be non-compact while the flange is compact. The nominal flexural strength is taken as the minimum of the strengths from yielding and local buckling of the elements. No lateral torsional buckling analysis is provided by the code. The document concludes with the nominal flexural strength of the RHS beam.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    A‐2 

    Strength Analysis of AAB‐SE‐AS‐StCS‐0130 (Rolled RHS 200x400x12.0).xmcd
    Design Code: American Standards
    TempVer20.0_012018 | Engineer: S.M.Lomboy Jr.
    Design and Engineering Dept.

    C} Strength Analysis
    C.1 Flexural Strength (Yielding/Lateral Torsional Buckling/Flange and Web Local Buckling), Chapter F

    Note: Only the most unfavorable
    elements are always considered
    in the local buckling analysis!

    Figure C.1 Elements/Part Schedule Figure C.2 Reference for Any Element/Part Dimensioning
    Bending about Y Axis (Minor Axis)

    a) Local Buckling Analysis, SecƟon F.7

    Local Buckling Parameters
    Description Symbol A B Unit Reference
    Stiffened 
    Stiffened  Table B4.1b, Case 19 / 
    Element Type Element type Element, 
    Element, Web Case 17
    Flange
    Thickness of Element t 12.00 12.00 mm Figure C.2
    Width of Element b 164.00 364.00 mm Figure C.2
    Element Slenderness l 13.67 30.33
    Limiting Width to Thickness Ratio lp 57.44 26.58
    lr 135.29 33.23
    Element Classification Compact Non‐Compact
    Nominal  Strength Due to Yielding Myn_Y 380.59 380.59 kNm Eq F7‐1
    Nominal  Strength Due to Flange Local Buckling Myn_fLB ‐ 380.59 kNm Eq F7‐5
    Nominal  Strength Due to Web Local Buckling Myn_wLB 380.59 ‐ kNm Eq F7‐2, Eq F7‐3
    Nominal Stress Due to Yielding/Local Buckling Myn_YLB 380.59 380.59 kNm

    MynYLB  min ( MyA MyB ) kN m  380.59 kN m ← Nominal Flexural Strength Due to Y/FLB/WLB

    b) Global Buckling Analysis (Lateral Torsional Buckling) No provision for this analysis in the code!

    The Specifica on provides no strength equa on for the LTB limit state as beam deflec on will control.


    c) Nominal Strength

     
    Myn Lb  MynYLB ← Nominal Flexural Strength

    43 of 100

    You might also like