Analysis of Macroeconomic Policies: Fiscal Policy
Analysis of Macroeconomic Policies: Fiscal Policy
Analysis of Macroeconomic Policies: Fiscal Policy
Inflation -
Inflation remained moderate at an average rate of around 3% per annum over the last decade.
The main contributors to inflation were food, housing, water, electricity, non-alcoholic
beverages,
transport, gas, and fuel. These three categories accounted for 80% of the overall increase in
consumer prices.
Unemployment -
The economy continues to be in full employment with the unemployment rate remaining at 2.9%
This can be attributed to the steady economic growth and improvements in the labour market.
Around 3.2 million jobs were created in the last decade mainly in the services and manufacturing
sectors. Labour productivity has still been an
issue for Malaysia. As per the 10 th Plan report, Malaysia’s labour productivity was estimated
to be 32.4% when compared to US and 56.1% with respect to South Korea. The Malaysian
economy is still driven by traditional factors of production consisting of physical and human
capital, which contributes to about 70% of GDP growth.
In order to facilitate fiscal consolidation, many structural reforms were taken by the
government during last decade like establishing the Fiscal Policy Committee, adopting
Outcome-Based Budgeting, and implementation of GST. The government also rationalised
the subsidies on fuel by the introduction of the managed float system for retail RON95 and
diesel prices.
Monetary Policy
The apex monetary authority of the country consisting of the central bank or currency board
uses monetary policies to control the cost of very short-term borrowing or the value of
monetary base, targeting an interest rate or inflation rate to ensure price stability and general
trust in the currency.
Interest Rate
The central bank of Malaysia has kept the interest rate at 3.25% for the current quarter in
2018. The average interest rate from 2004 until 2018 has been 2.99% due to various reasons
like strong private investment and consumption, low unemployment. Malaysian economy has
been fundamentally strong with steady economic growth and capital account surplus. The
country has second lowest interest rate in the ASEAN country after Singapore which has
1.45%. Hence, lending is cheaper in the country which spurs the private consumption and
investment.
The malaysain currency ‘Ringit’ has not been internationalised since September 1998 by the
Bank Negara Malaysia due to the aftermath of Asian financial crisis in 1997. It has been
pegged with dollar and the current traded price is RM4.2 for $1 as of 28 th Novemebr, 2018.
Many attempts has been made in 2012 and 2014 to internationalised but the central bank
recently said that the ringgit will be internationalised when it's ready.
Other Policies
Subsidies and taxes:
Malaysian government provides subsidies on lots of essential items like cooking oil, palm oil,
petrol, rice, flour, bread and other essentials to keep their prices under market prices so that
cost of living low is kept low. It used to provide subsidy on petrol till 2014 which was 12% of
the government expenditure on subsidy. Post 2014, it moved to ‘managed float’ system.
Government follows a progressive income tax rate system where rates go up to 26% which is
quite similar to other ASEAN country. The govt has roll back the GST which it has
introduced three years back in 2015 at a rate of 6% to increase the revenue and reduce the
burden of fiscal debt on the government. The annual collection shot up to $14 billion. But it
was not welcomed by the people of Malaysia and opposition govt after coming to power
reintroducing SST (Sale and Service Tax) which is not considered as efficient and the
collection fell to half.
There has been a loss of comparative advantage in manufacturing costs when compared to
neighbouring countries like Myanmar and Cambodia. Malaysia lacks the technological
acumen and innovations to compete in high-quality goods market and is unable to compete
with developed economies.
GST implementation has further reduced the purchasing capacity of citizens due to higher
commodity and real estate prices.
Ordinary citizens spend a huge portion of their monthly income to pay up for the property
instalments and paying rents.
Due to the weakening of consumer sentiment and rising cost of living, households have
begun to save more by decreasing their spending levels.
The investment levels will have a negative effect. Lower disposable income will lead to
lower consumption level and diminish the intention of investments. The Global Competitive
index have also pointed out that Malaysia has fell from its previous rank of 18 th to current
ranking of 25th.
The 1MDB scandal and the oil glut along with the plummet of Ringgit has worsened the
situation. It is further causing the cost push inflation due to weak Ringgit used for import of
raw materials and consumer goods. It is further leading to capital outflow which may further
deteriorate the floating exchange rate.
There has been a significant increase in administrative and compliance costs for new business
due to GST. Investors are unwilling to invest due to cautious spending pattern and would opt
to invest in more promising economies.
This will adversely impact the economic prospects of the country and will definitely deter the
plan of breaking through the middle-income trap.
Loss of human capital due to middle-income trap is also being observed as a result of outflow
of skilled human capital. There has been a stagnant real growth in wages which is further
worsening the issue of brain drain in Malaysia. The new generation of people are moving
overseas in search of better education and employment opportunities.
The initiative to make Malaysia a favourable place for doing businesses and investment is
crucial for the future growth of the country and to improve the consumption pattern of the
households. Governments should strategies new policies to keep the investments within the
country which is currently flowing out to the neighbouring economies and create new
business destinations and policies to attract more investments into the country by providing
them better infrastructure, productive workforce, and tax reductions/exemption during the
initial years of operation.
Government should plan accordingly against cost-push inflation and implement a certain
level of protection to nullify the impact of rising cost towards household consumption.
The short-term solution can be provided by fixing ceiling price of the basic necessities,
increase the minimum wage of employees, and give subsidies to vulnerable groups.
In long run this may lead to budget deficit leading to another financial crisis.
Therefore, households can start investing a part of their savings. The volatility of the financial
market has caused the households to invest in lower risk investment options like bonds
compared to the risky stock market. A structured financial plan will allow the households to
survive during recession and drive them to grow during economic boom.
Malaysian economy despite having a positive business outlook hasn’t benefitted from its
growth and has been offset due to impact of inflation and weak currency. The primary focus
should be on national growth as well as to focus on crating solutions that can mitigate the
contributing factors of the middle-income trap. Governments should collaborate with the
private sector as well due as they contribute a fair share towards achieving the high-income
status. The collaborations allow different perspectives to be considered before the decision-
making process and the most efficient solution benefiting all the sectors can then be executed
to reach the common goal of becoming a high-income economy by the year 2020.