(For IPCRF)

Position Title: Public Schools District Supervisor Salary Grade: 22

Key Results Areas (KRA) Weight Objectives Performance Indicators Means of Verification (MOV)

Instructional Supervision 25% Provided guidance and 5 – conducted 20 classroom Monthly Supervisory Plan
instructional supervision to observations per month using the
school heads by observing and “observe the observer” scheme Monthly Supervisory Report
gathering data on their strengths within the target duly reflected in
and development needs and the regularly submitted Monthly
coaching them towards Supervisory Plan and Monthly
improved instructional Supervisory Report
leadership practices (15%)
4 – conducted 15 classroom
observations per month using the
“observe the observer” scheme
but below the target duly
reflected in the regularly
submitted Monthly Supervisory
Plan and Monthly Supervisory
Report

3 - conducted 10 classroom
observations per month using the
“observe the observer” scheme
but below the target duly
reflected in the regularly
submitted Monthly Supervisory
Plan and Monthly Supervisory
Report

2 - conducted 5 classroom
observations per month using the
“observe the observer” scheme
but below the target duly
reflected in the regularly
submitted Monthly Supervisory
Plan and Monthly Supervisory
 Report

1 - conducted at least 2
classroom observations per
month using the “observe the
observer” scheme but below the
target duly reflected in the
regularly submitted Monthly
Supervisory Plan and Monthly
Supervisory Report

5 – Submitted monthly
Observed and gathered data on consolidated data on the Checklist of Monthly
the strengths and competency
strengths and competency needs Supervisory Report of School
(KSA) development needs of
teachers and coached school of teachers with the Heads
heads on how to improve recommendations on improving
teachers’ KSA in teaching- teaching-learning delivery Consolidated Monthly
learning delivery. (5%) provided to school heads Supervisory Report

4 - Submitted bi-monthly
consolidated data on the
strengths and competency needs
of teachers with the
recommendations on improving
teaching-learning delivery
provided to school heads

3 - Submitted quarterly
consolidated data on the
strengths and competency needs
of teachers with the
recommendations on improving
teaching-learning delivery
provided to school heads

2 - Submitted semestral
consolidated data on the
 strengths and competency needs
of teachers with the
recommendations on improving
teaching-learning delivery
provided to school heads

1 - Submitted annual
consolidated data on the
strengths and competency needs
of teachers with the
recommendations on improving
teaching-learning delivery
provided to school heads

5 – Conducted monthly visit to

96% -100% of the schools in the
assigned district to assess and
Assessed the situation of identify actions needed in the
schools and learning centers, improvement of the teaching-
and identified actions needed to learning environment which is
put in place an enabling necessary for the effective
environment for School Heads
delivery of quality education.
and Teachers to deliver quality
basic education. (5%) 4 - Conducted monthly visit to
91%-95% of the schools in the
assigned district to assess and
identify actions needed in the
improvement of the teaching-
learning environment which is
necessary for the effective
delivery of quality education.

3 - Conducted monthly visit to

86% - 90% of the schools in the
assigned district to assess and
identify actions needed in the
 improvement of the teaching-
learning environment which is
necessary for the effective
delivery of quality education.

2 - Conducted monthly visit to

81% - 85% of the schools in the
assigned district to assess and
identify actions needed in the
improvement of the teaching-
learning environment which is
necessary for the effective
delivery of quality education.

1 - Conducted monthly visit to

80% and below of the schools in
the assigned district to assess and
identify actions needed in the
improvement of the teaching-
learning environment which is
necessary for the effective
delivery of quality education.

Technical Assistance in 10% Provided technical assistance in 5 – Acted as facilitator in the Certificate of Commendation as
School Management the formulation of school plans division SIP workshop; coached Facilitator
(e.g. SIP) and its adjustments by 91% - 100% of the school heads
conducting workshops, doing List of Schools in the assigned
in the assigned district during the
follow through coaching and district with ACCEPTED SIP
providing appraisal and SIP preparation; reviewed and
feedback on their draft plans, so provided helpful feedback in the
that all schools can have draft SIP and expedited SIP
approved plans as basis for approval for 100% of the schools
budgeting and resourcing. in the assigned district.

4 - Acted as facilitator in the

division SIP workshop; coached
81%-90% of the school heads in
the assigned district during the
SIP preparation; reviewed and
provided helpful feedback in the
draft SIP and expedited SIP
approval for 81%-90% of the
schools in the assigned district.

3 - Acted as facilitator in the

division SIP workshop; coached
71%-80% of the school heads in
the assigned district during the
SIP preparation; reviewed and
provided helpful feedback in the
draft SIP and expedited SIP
approval for 71%-80% of the
schools in the assigned district.

2 - Acted as facilitator in the

division SIP workshop; coached
61%-70%of the school heads in
the assigned district during the
SIP preparation; reviewed and
provided helpful feedback in the
draft SIP and expedited SIP
approval for 61%-70% of the
schools in the assigned district.

1 - Acted as facilitator in the

division SIP workshop; coached
60% and below of the school
heads in the assigned district
during the SIP preparation;
reviewed and provided helpful
feedback in the draft SIP and
expedited SIP approval for 60%
and below of the schools in the
assigned district.
 5 – Monitored, evaluated and
submitted report on the SIP
implementation of the 91% -
100% of the schools in the
assigned district once a month.

4 - Monitored, evaluated and

submitted report on the SIP
implementation of the 81% -
90% of the schools in the
assigned district once every two
(2) months.

3 - Monitored, evaluated and

submitted report on the SIP
implementation of the 71% -
80% of the schools in the
assigned district once in a every
quarter.

2 - Monitored, evaluated and

submitted report on the SIP
implementation of the 61%-70%
of the schools in the assigned
district once in every semester.

1 - Monitored, evaluated and

Monitored and evaluated
submitted report on the SIP
school’s implementation of their
plans and submit reports to the implementation of the 60% and
Schools Division management below of the schools in the
team to provide feedback. assigned district once in every
calendar year.

5 – Coached 91%-100% of the

school heads in the assigned
district on the effective
implementation of the programs
 and projects and attainment of
their objectives once a month.
Coached and guided the schools
in his/her assigned district to 4 - Coached 81%-90% of the
effectively implement their school heads in the assigned
programs and projects and attain district on the effective
their objectives. implementation of the programs
and projects and attainment of
their objectives once every two
(2) months.

3 - Coached 71%-80% of the

school heads in the assigned
district on the effective
implementation of the programs
and projects and attainment of
their objectives once in every
quarter.

2 - Coached 61%-70% of the

school heads in the assigned
district on the effective
implementation of the programs
and projects and attainment of
their objectives once in every
semester.

1 - Coached 60% and below of

the school heads in the assigned
district on the effective
implementation of the programs
and projects and attainment of
their objectives once in every
calendar year.

Monitoring and Evaluation 10% Conducted monitoring and 5 – 91% - 100% of the schools in
evaluation on the utilization and the assigned district were
liquidation of SEF, MOOE and monitored and evaluated re:
other funds to determine if
schools adhere with the policy proper utilization and prompt
and standards using pre- liquidation of SEF, MOOE and
designed M & E and other funds every month.
transparency tools. (4%)
4 - 81% - 90% of the schools in
the assigned district were
monitored and evaluated re:
proper utilization and prompt
liquidation of SEF, MOOE and
other funds twice in every
quarter.

3 - 71% - 80% of the schools in

the assigned district were
monitored and evaluated re:
proper utilization and prompt
liquidation of SEF, MOOE and
other funds once in every
quarter.

2 - 61% - 70% of the schools in

the assigned district were
monitored and evaluated re:
proper utilization and prompt
liquidation of SEF, MOOE and
other funds once in every
semester.

1 - 60% and below of the schools

in the assigned district were
monitored and evaluated re:
proper utilization and prompt
liquidation of SEF, MOOE and
other funds once in every
calendar year.
 5 – 91%-100% of the schools
SBM Level of Practice in the
Monitored SBM Level of assigned district were monitored
practice through validation of
their documents and outputs to and validated once in every
determine areas for development quarter.
and possible provision of
technical assistance to improve 4 – 81% - 90% of the schools
school performance. (4%) Level of Practice in the assigned
district were monitored once in
every quarter.

3 - 71% - 80% of the schools

Level of Practice in the assigned
district were monitored once in
every quarter.

2 - 61% - 70% of the schools

Level of Practice in the assigned
district were monitored once in
every quarter.

1 - 60% and below of the schools

Level of Practice in the assigned
district were monitored once in
every quarter.

5 – 91%-100% of the private

Monitored and evaluated private
schools in the assigned district
schools through ocular
inspection of required were monitored and evaluated;
documents to determine status reports were submitted to
adherence to set standards as the Division Focal Person at the
regards to permit to operate start of the school year.
renewal of operation, permit for
recognition, GASTPE 4 - 81%-90% of the private
implementation and schools in the assigned district
accreditation (2%)
 were monitored and evaluated;
status reports were submitted to
the Division Focal Person at the
start of the school year.

3 - 71%-80% of the private

schools in the assigned district
were monitored and evaluated;
status reports were submitted to
the Division Focal Person at the
start of the school year.

2 - 61%-70% of the private

schools in the assigned district
were monitored and evaluated;
status reports were submitted to
the Division Focal Person at the
start of the school year.

1 - 60% and below of the private

schools in the assigned district
were monitored and evaluated;
status reports were submitted to
the Division Focal Person at the
start of the school year.

Curriculum Development, 10% Conduct monitoring and 5 – 91% - 100% schools in the
Enrichment and Localization evaluation of the school’s assigned district were monitored
implementation of the localized and evaluated along localization
curriculum to provide feedback
of the curriculum; provided
to management towards
continuous enhancement of the regular feedback to the
curriculum. management on the results of
curriculum review

4 - 81% - 90% schools in the

assigned district were monitored
and evaluated along localization
of the curriculum; provided
 regular feedback to the
management on the results of
curriculum review

3 - 71% - 80% schools in the

assigned district were monitored
and evaluated along localization
of the curriculum; provided
regular feedback to the
management on the results of
curriculum review

2 - 61% - 70% schools in the

assigned district were monitored
and evaluated along localization
of the curriculum; provided
regular feedback to the
management on the results of
curriculum review

1 - 60% and below of the schools

in the assigned district were
monitored and evaluated along
localization of the curriculum;
provided regular feedback to the
management on the results of
curriculum review

Learning Outcomes 10% Gathered result of assessment 5 – submitted complete, correct,

Assessment reports per district and per categorized and validated data
school, per subject area and with recommended interventions
analyze performance gaps to
on the quarterly results of
pinpoint causes and possible
interventions to close the gap. learners’ assessment of 91%-
(5%) 100% schools in the assigned
district.

4 - submitted complete, correct,

categorized and validated data
 with recommended interventions
on the quarterly results of
learners’ assessment of 81%-
90% schools in the assigned
district.

3 - submitted complete, correct,

categorized and validated data
with recommended interventions
on the quarterly results of
learners’ assessment of 71%-
80% schools in the assigned
district.

2 - submitted complete, correct,

categorized and validated data
with recommended interventions
on the quarterly results of
learners’ assessment of 61%-
70% schools in the assigned
district.

1 - submitted complete, correct,

categorized and validated data
with recommended interventions
on the quarterly results of
learners’ assessment of 60% and
below of the schools in the
assigned district.

5 – proposed at least 5 policy

recommendations re:
improvement of learning
outcomes per calendar year
Drafted policy
recommendations related to 4 - proposed at least 4 policy
improving learning outcome recommendations re:
based on findings from studies improvement of learning
and reports. (5%)
 outcomes per calendar year

3 - proposed at least 3 policy

recommendations re:
improvement of learning
outcomes per calendar year

2 - proposed at least 2 policy

recommendations re:
improvement of learning
outcomes per calendar year

1 - proposed at least 1 policy

recommendation re:
improvement of learning
outcomes per calendar year

Research 10% Conducted action research on 5 – Proposed and completed at

curriculum implementation, least two (2) action research
needs and issues, appropriate proposals per calendar year
interventions for assigned
along curriculum and submitted
district as well as best practices
and submit findings and findings and recommendations to
recommendations for the management
management action and policy
formulation. 4 - Proposed and completed at
least one (1) action research
proposal per calendar year along
curriculum and submitted
findings and recommendations to
the management

3 - Proposed and completed at

least one (1) action research
proposal along curriculum per
calendar year

2 - Proposed at least one (1)

action research proposal along
 curriculum per calendar year

1 – Reviewed at least two (2)

research proposals per calendar
year

Technical Assistance 15% Assessed the situation and 5 – Provided immediate and
analyzed the needs of schools in appropriate technical assistance
the district to identify the to 91%-100% schools in the
appropriate and relevant actions
assigned district
and interventions (5%)
4 - Provided immediate and
appropriate technical assistance
to 81%-90% schools in the
assigned district

3 - Provided immediate and

appropriate technical assistance
to 71%-80% schools in the
assigned district

2 - Provided immediate and

appropriate technical assistance
to 61%-70% schools in the
assigned district

1 - Provided immediate and

appropriate technical assistance
to 60% and below of the schools
in the assigned district

Coordinated with the EPS 5 – Prepared and submitted

concerned to arrive at a Approved Monthly Technical
technical assistance plan for Assistance (TA) Plan in
each district. (5%) coordination with the learning
area supervisors

4 - Prepared and submitted

 Approved Technical Assistance
(TA) Plan in coordination with
the learning area supervisors
once every two (2) months

3 - Prepared and submitted

Approved Technical Assistance
(TA) Plan in coordination with
the learning area supervisors
once in a quarter

2 - Prepared and submitted

Approved Technical Assistance
(TA) Plan in coordination with
the learning area supervisors
once in a semester

1 - Prepared and submitted

Approved Technical Assistance
(TA) Plan in coordination with
the learning area supervisors
once in every calendar year

Prepared and submitted reports Submitted comprehensive

on the results of technical Technical Assistance (TA)
assistance and corresponding Report based on the Technical
policy recommendations for and policy recommendations
management consideration.
(5%) 5 – monthly

4 – bi-monthly

3 – quarterly

2 – semestral

1 - annually

Plus Factor 10% Performed other tasks assigned Accomplishment report

 by the higher officials.

Total 100%