Instructor Evaluation Template
Instructor Evaluation Template
Instructor Evaluation Template
Teacher Evaluation
Teacher’s Name Social Security Number
B. Learning Climate
C. Instruction
White Copy to Chief Divisional Administrator, Personnel Canary Copy to Chief Educational Administrator/Principal Pink Copy to Principal Gold Copy to Teacher
(If appropriate)
*This rating option may be used for interim evaluations only.
ER-06 11/03
PGIN 7540-9014
Prince George's County Public Schools • 14201 School Lane • Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772 • www.pgcps.org (Page 1 of 2)
Teacher’s Name Social Security Number School Year
II. Professionalism
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY
Comments:
IF I DO NOT AGREE WITH THIS EVALUATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT I MAY SUBMIT A LETTER TO THE CHIEF
DIVISIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, PERSONNEL TO BE PLACED IN MY PERSONNEL FOLDER WITH COPIES TO THE
CHIEF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATOR/PRINCIPAL OR PRINCIPAL, AS APPROPRIATE.
*This rating option may be used for interim evaluations only. (Page 2 of 2)
Directions For the Proper Use of This Teacher Evaluation Form
Rating Options
An evaluation system can only be fair and effective when there is common agreement and understanding between the principal and
the teacher as to the criteria for each of the rating options. The following descriptive explanation of each of the rating options is
provided to ensure a common understanding of each:
Satisfactory: Performance is consistently adequate and acceptable. A satisfactory rating indicates that the teacher has
effectively executed the tasks referenced in the rating element.
Needs to Improve: Performance is sometimes inadequate and unacceptable. Additional assistance and supervision
may be required. (This rating option may be used for interim evaluations only)
Unsatisfactory: Fails to correct weaknesses; or deficiencies are such a serious nature that they result in inadequate or
unacceptable performance.
Note: Principals are to place a check in the most appropriate box for each rating element.
Rating Elements
The rating elements listed within the evaluation are designed to reflect the characteristics of effective teaching as defined in the
teacher edition of Standards for Excellence in Teaching published by the Prince George’s County Public Schools. Principals and
teachers may refer to that publication for a detailed definition of the characteristics of effective teaching.
Achievement Outcomes
Non-tenured teachers and teachers rated less than satisfactory must develop a reasonable set of outcomes for the students to achieve.
The outcomes could include performance on the CRT's, magazine tests, or any other outcomes that the principal and teacher believe
are reasonable. During the last six weeks of school, the principal will review the expected outcomes and the actual achievement of
each. These goals should be included as an attachment to this evaluation form.
Comments
The “Comments” section may be used to record any information the principal determines is appropriate to the evaluation. It may also
be used to list extra duty contributions.
ER-06 (Back)
RESET