Access To Resorcylic Acid Lactones Via Phosphonate Based Intramolecular Olefination
Access To Resorcylic Acid Lactones Via Phosphonate Based Intramolecular Olefination
Access To Resorcylic Acid Lactones Via Phosphonate Based Intramolecular Olefination
org/joc
paul.v.murphy@nuigalway.ie
Received June 1, 2010
and L-783,2778).9 It can thus be argued that the RAL frame-
work is privileged10 and that analogues of these natural prod-
ucts should be of interest for screening in bioassays. Besides
their important biological properties, the RALs are of interest
from the synthetic point of view.11
Zearalenone, isolated in 1962 from the fungus Gibberella
zeae,12 was the first member of the RAL family to attract the
attention of both chemists and biologists due to its potent
agonism of the estrogen receptor. Zearalenone was shown to
adopt a conformation that mimics the steroid and competes
with estradiol binding to the estrogen receptor. As a result
of its interesting biological properties, several groups have
developed syntheses of this natural product,13 and it has served
as a testing ground for macrocyclization methodologies such as
the Corey-Nicolaou macrolactonization,14 Masamune’s thio-
An approach to resorcylic acid lactones is described, ex-
ester-lactonization,15 ring-closing metathesis (RCM),16 and
ploiting an intramolecular olefination reaction for the gen- more recently late stage aromatization-macrocyclization.17
eration of the 14-membered macrolactone. The synthetic
route gave zearalenone precursors, and the preparations of (8) Zhao, A.; Lee, S. H.; Mojena, M.; Jenkins, R. G.; Patrick, D. R.;
other RAL analogues, trans- and cis-resorcylides are in- Huber, H. E.; Goetz, M. A.; Hensens, O. D.; Zink, D. L.; Vilella, D.;
Dombrowski, A. W.; Lingham, R. B.; Huang, L. J. Antibiot. 1999, 52, 1086.
cluded, the latter being prepared by photoisomerization of (9) Winssinger, N.; Barluenga, S. Chem. Commun. 2007, 22.
the trans-isomer. β-Haloketone derivatives were also pre- (10) (a) Hirschmann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1991, 30, 1278. (b) Koch,
M. A.; Waldmann, H. Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10, 471.
pared in a highly stereoselective manner by conjugate (11) For selected syntheses of aigialomycin D, see: (a) Yang, Z.-Q.; Geng, X;
addition of chloride or bromide to the E-enone using boron Solit, D.; Pratilas, C. A.; Rosen, N.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
trichloride and boron tribromide, respectively. 126, 7881. (b) Geng, X.; Danishefsky, S. J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 413. (c) Lu, J.; Ma,
J.; Xie, X.; Chen, B.; She, X.; Pan, X. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 2006, 17, 1066. (d)
Calo, F.; Richardson, J.; Barrett, A. G. M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4910. For
hypothemycin and LL-Z1640-2, see: (e) Tatsuta, K.; Takano, S.; Sato, T.;
Nakano, S. Chem. Lett. 2001, 172. (f) Selles, P.; Lett, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 4621. (g) Selles, P.; Lett, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4627. (h) Dakas,
The resorcylic acid lactones (RALs, Chart 1) are endowed P.-Y.; Jogireddy, R.; Valot, G.; Barluenga, S.; Winssinger, N. Chem.;Eur. J.
with a breadth of biological activity. Compounds within this 2009, 15, 11490. For L-783,277, see: (i) Hofmann, T.; Altmann, K.-H. Synlett
class span from being transcription factor modulators (zearale- 2008, 10, 1500. (j) Choi, H. G.; Son, J. B.; Park, D.-S.; Ham, Y. J.; Hah, J.-M.;
Sim, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4942–4946.
none1 and zearalenol2) to HSP90 inhibitors (radicicol3 and (12) Stob, M.; Baldwin, R. S.; Tuite, J.; Andrews, F. N.; Gillette, K. G.
pochonin D4) and reversible (aigialomycin D5) as well as Nature 1962, 196, 1318.
(13) For selected syntheses of zearalenone, see: (a) Taub, D; Girotra,
irreversible kinase inhibitors (hypothemycin,6 LL-Z1640-2,7 N. N.; Hoffsommer, R. D.; Kuo, C. H.; Slates, H. L.; Weber, S.; Wendler,
N. L. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 2443. (b) Takahashi, T.; Ikeda, H.; Tsuji, J.
(1) Miksicek, R. J. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1994, 49, 153. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1363 and references therein. (c) Hitchcock, S. A.;
(2) Shier, W. T. Rev. Med. Vet. (Toulouse, Fr.) 1998, 149, 599. Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3641. (d) Solladie, G.; Maestro,
(3) (a) Schulte, T. W.; Akinaga, S.; Soga, S.; Sullivan, W.; Stensgard, B.; M. C.; Rubio, A.; Pedregal, C.; Carre~ no, M. C.; Garcia Ruano, J. L. J. Org.
Toft, D.; Neckers, L. M. Cell Stress Chaperones 1998, 3, 100. (b) Sharma, Chem. 1991, 56, 2317. (e) Kalivretenos, A.; Stille, J. K.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Org.
S. V.; Agatsuma, T.; Nakano, H. Oncogene 1998, 16, 2639. Chem. 1991, 56, 2883. (f) Wang, Z. Q.; Tian, S. K. Chin. Chem. Lett. 1997, 8,
(4) Moulin, E.; Zoete, V.; Barluenga, S.; Karplus, M.; Winssinger, N. 591. (g) Nicolaou, K. C.; Wissinger, N.; Pastor, J.; Murphy, F. Angew.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6999. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2534 and references therein.
(5) Barluenga, S.; Dakas, P.-Y.; Ferandi, Y.; Meijer, L.; Winssinger, N. (14) Corey, E. J.; Nicolaou, K. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 5614.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 118, 4055. (15) Masamune, S.; Kamata, S.; Schilling, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97,
(6) Tanaka, H.; Nishida, K.; Sugita, K.; Yoshioka, T. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 3515.
1999, 90, 1139. (b) Schirmer, A.; Kennedy, J.; Murli, S.; Reid, R.; Santi, D. V. (16) F€urstner, A.; Thiel, O. R.; Kindler, N.; Bartkowska, B. J. Org. Chem.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 4234. 2000, 65, 7990.
(7) Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.; Kajino, T.; Ono, K.; Ohtomo, T.; Matsumoto, (17) Navarro, I.; Basset, J.-F.; Hebbe, S.; Major, S. M.; Werner, T.;
M.; Shiina, M.; Mihara, M.; Tsuchiya, M; Matsumoto, K. J. Biol. Chem. Howsham, C.; Br€ ackow, J.; Barrett, A. G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
2003, 278, 18485. 10293.
7404 J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7404–7407 Published on Web 10/12/2010 DOI: 10.1021/jo100998b
r 2010 American Chemical Society
Napolitano et al.
JOC Note
SCHEME 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of 1 SCHEME 3. Synthesis of 4
SCHEME 2. Synthesis of 3
TABLE 1. Intramolecular Olefination challenge was to extend the route to the preparation of cis-
enone containing resorcylides, which have recently
emerged as lead compounds for kinase inhibition.32 The
photoinduced isomerization of the trans-enone to the
thermodynamically less stable cis-isomer was thus inves-
tigated. When exposed to light, 15 gave an intractable
mixture of products. Hypothesizing that the introduction
entry 2a/2b conditions T (°C) yield 15 (%) of intramolecular H-bonding between the macrolactone
1 2a KHMDS, 18-crown-6, THF -83 53 carbonyl and the phenol hydroxyl group might facilitate
2 2a NaH, THF 0 77 the photoisomerization to the cis-isomer by acting as
3 2b NaH, THF 0 62 stereocontrolling element,33 we attempted the photoi-
4 2b DBU, NaI, THF -78 50 somerization with the phenol 17, which was prepared
5 2b K2CO3, 18-crown-6, toluene 70 54
from 15 using the boron trichloride induced cleavage of
selected with a view to investigating whether the intramolecular the o-methyl ether. Upon exposure to light (350 nm) 17
olefination reaction would lead to the cis-enone product, as was readily isomerized, affording a 3:2 mixture of both the
is generally the case for intermolecular reactions with these cis-enones 18 and 19 (50% conversion, Scheme 5). Efforts
types of reagents. This was necessary to clarify given that the to achieve the selective photoisomerization of the enone
cis-enone is found in a number of important RALs such as double bond by using different UV wavelengths (300 nm,
LL-Z1640-2 and L-783,277. The investigation of the reaction 250 nm) were unsuccessful and gave complex mixtures of
of bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) methylphosphonate and diphenyl products and/or degradation of the starting material.
methylphosphonate with LDA in THF at -78 °C provided Although the two isomers 18 and 19 were not, in our
5a and 5b in poor yield (16% and 14%, respectively). An hands, separable by chromatography, the success of the
improvement was obtained by carrying out the reaction trans-cis photoconversion represented an important
at -95 °C and by replacing LDA with LHMDS as base; these finding as together with the HWE type olefination reac-
revised conditions led to the generation of 5a (57%) and 5b tion it potentially allows the preparation of members of
(46%) in more respectable yields. Cross metathesis of aldehyde both the trans- and cis-RAL subfamilies. It is also note-
14 with 5a and 5b using the Hoveyda-Grubbs’ generation II worthy that the photoisomerization of the styryl alkene
catalyst provided 2a (65%) and 2b (69%), with the only could be of interest, as the cis-geometry at this position
E-alkene products being obtained in each case. occurs in aigialomycin E.34 Interestingly, the O-demethy-
Intermediate 2a was found to be unstable to chromatog- lation of 15 afforded, besides the phenol 17, a small
raphy; efforts to purify 2a using silica gel, which had been amount (5%) of the 1,4-addition adduct33,4 20 as a single
pretreated with 1% triethylamine or using florisil led to the diastereoisomer, the configuration at C80 being estab-
spontaneous conversion to the E-enone 15 in 20% and 35% lished by X-ray crystallography. The β-haloketone 20
yield, respectively, over two steps. Chromatography using has been speculated to be a zearalenone metabolite. 35
nontreated silica gel afforded a sample of 2a contaminated Evaluation of compounds as kinase inhibitors where the
with small amount (5-10%) of enone E-15. The intramo- cis-enone functionality is replaced with a β-haloketone
lecular olefination was subsequently investigated (Table 1) would be of interest. Like the cis-enone, the β-haloketone
under a range of conditions. When reacting 2a with NaH in could potentially react with a cysteine thiol group that is
THF at 0 °C (entry 2), the E-isomer 15 was obtained in 77% conserved in some kinases.6b Thus, in order to generate
isolated yield. The phosphonate 2b gave E-15 in lower yield samples for biological evaluation, the halides 20 and 21
(62%, entry 3) under the same conditions. The conversion of were obtained after treatment of 17 with boron trichloride
15 to 1 was next accomplished (Scheme 5). Thus, chemose- and boron tribromide, respectively. These reactions were
lective hydride-mediated conjugate reduction of 15 using both highly stereoselective, leading to a single diastereoi-
the copper(I) hydride cluster [(Ph3P)CuH]629 followed by somer. Steric factors in the transition state are the major
cleavage of the o-methyl ether from 16 readily gave (S)-4- reason for the observed selectivity; the conformation of the
O-methyl zearalenone (1, 72% over two steps). The full de- macrolide leaves one face of the enone open to, presumably,
O-methylation of 16 to give zearalenone was described Lewis acid facilitated nucleophilic attack of the halide.
previously.30 Attempts to carry out a one-pot O-demethylation and
Although attempts to use the Still-Gennari or Ando 1,4-halide addition from 15 to give 20 and 21 were less
phosphonates to promote Z-selective intramolecular ole- productive than the two-step process.
fination were unsuccessful, the strategy was efficient for Finally, the reduced compounds 22-25 (Scheme 6) were
generating trans-resorcylides (i.e., 15), allowing the direct prepared, where the styryl double bond was converted
access to the aigialomycin A 31 framework, for example. A to an alkane. While this modification may seem modest,
the structural change can alter the macrocycle conformation
and consequently the selectivity of RALs.32a Thus, catalytic
(29) Mahoney, W. S.; Brestensky, D. M.; Stryker, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 291.
(30) Hitchcock, S. A.; Pattenden, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992,
1323. (33) Couladouros, E. A.; Mihou, A. P.; Bouzas, E. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
(31) Isaka, M.; Suyarnsestakorn, C.; Tanticharoen, M.; Kongsaeree, P.; 977.
Thebtaranonth, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1561. (34) Isaka, M.; Suyarnsestakorn, C.; Tanticharoen, M. J. Org. Chem.
(32) (a) Jogireddy, R.; Dakas, P.-Y.; Valot, G.; Barluenga, S.; Winssinger, N. 2002, 67, 1561.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 11498 and references therein. (b) Barluenga, S.; Dakas, (35) (a) Bolliger, G.; Tamm, C. Helv. Chim. Acta 1972, 55, 3030. (b)
P.-Y.; Boulifa, M.; Moulin, E.; Winssinger, N. C. R. Chim. 2008, 11, 1306. Jackson, R. A.; Fenton, S. W.; Mirocha, C. J.; Davis, G. J. Agric. Food Chem.
(c) Hofmann, T.; Altmann, K.-H. C. R. Chim. 2008, 11, 1318. 1974, 22, 1015.