Dual Reactivity of Hydroxy-And Methoxy - Substituted O-Quinone Methides in Aqueous Solutions: Hydration Versus Tautomerization
Dual Reactivity of Hydroxy-And Methoxy - Substituted O-Quinone Methides in Aqueous Solutions: Hydration Versus Tautomerization
Dual Reactivity of Hydroxy-And Methoxy - Substituted O-Quinone Methides in Aqueous Solutions: Hydration Versus Tautomerization
org/joc
vpopik@chem.uga.edu
Received August 17, 2010
7338 J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7338–7346 Published on Web 10/06/2010 DOI: 10.1021/jo101613t
r 2010 American Chemical Society
Arumugam and Popik
JOC Article
o-QMs can be efficiently generated by photodehydration
of o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol derivatives.2a,4a-c The enhanced
acidity of phenols in the excited state facilitates intramole-
cular proton transfer (ESIPT)7 of the phenolic proton to the
oxygen atom in benzylic position.4a-c C-O bond heterolysis
can be concerted with ESIPT or the loss of water might occur
in the ground state after proton transfer is complete.8 In
either case, the formation of o-QMs is usually complete
within a nanosecond pulse.4a-c o-QMs also can be generated
by photochemical elimination of ammonia or amines from
o-hydroxybenzylamines.9
The major reaction of o-QMs in aqueous solutions is rapid
addition of water producing o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol deriva-
tives. Efficacy enhancement of o-QM-based antitumor agents,1
as well as development of o-hydroxybenzyl photolabile protect- FIGURE 1. UV spectra of ca. 10-5 M aqueous solutions of 3a
ing groups,10 requires a better understanding of o-QM behavior (solid line) and 4a (dashed line).
in this medium. However, only kinetics of hydration of the
parent o-QM, 6-methylene-2,4-cyclohexadien-1-one, has been
investigated in detail.4b-d Little is known about the influence of
the electronic properties of substituents on the reactivity of
oQMs.4a,5d,11 Our recent studies of o-naphthoquinone methides
have demonstrated that the presence of an additional electron-
rich aromatic ring causes dramatic changes in the mechanism of
formation and reactivity of o-QM.11 These results prompted us
to investigate the effect of electron-donating substituents on the
dynamics of o-quinone methide hydration. In the present report
we discuss the photochemical generation and reactivity of
electron-rich o-quinone methides 1 and 2 (Scheme 1).
SCHEME 1
(15) (a) Itoh, T. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1019. (b) Dolenc, J.; Sket, B.; (16) Modica, E.; Zanaletti, R.; Freccero, M.; Mella, M. J. Org. Chem.
Strlic, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5669. 2001, 66, 41.
FIGURE 3. Transient spectra obtained at 5 μs (dashed line) and 1 ms (solid line) after the laser pulse in photolysis of ca. 0.1 mM aqueous
solutions of 3a (A) and 4a (B) at pH 7.0.
TABLE 3. Photolysis of o-QM Precursors 3b and 4b in Aqueous sients, which were subsequently identified as o-QMs 1 and 2 (vide
Acetate Ion Buffer Solutions (0.1M buffer, pH 4.57( 0.05) infra), decay at a relatively slower rate (τ = 3-8 ms). Since the
QM yield of 3a or yield of 4d/% yield of 5/% formation and the decay of o-QMs proceed at very different
precursor 4a/% (conversion)a (conversion)a (conversion)a
rates, these processes were recorded in separate experiments with
3b 27 ( 2 (29%) no acetylation 70 ( 2 (29%) use of different time scales and signal amplifications. The experi-
product mental data were fitted separately for each transient to a double
4b 66 ( 2 (13%) 31 ( 2 (13%) not detected
exponential function (Figure 4) and the first order rate constants
a
λirr = 300 nm; ca. 3 10-4 M in water.
were determined from the corresponding decay curve.12
Quinone methides are known to undergo very efficient
hetero-Diels-Alder reactions with electron-rich alkenes.4
Irradiation of 3a and 4a in aqueous acetonitrile in the
presence of 30 mM ethyl vinyl ether resulted in the formation
of adducts 6 and 7 in 90% isolated yields (Scheme 4).12
SCHEME 4
FIGURE 5. Quenching of o-QM 1 triangles) and 2 (circles) by FIGURE 6. Rate profile for the hydration of o-QM 1 (solid squares)
sodium azide in aqueous solutions at pH 7.0. and 2 (open circles) in aqueous solution at 25 °C.
kOH(2)= (1.08 ( 0.02) 104 M-1 s-1. The reactivities of in Scheme 5. Rate measurements were conducted in D2O
o-QMs 1 and 2 toward nucleophilic attack by the hydroxide solutions of DCl in the range of concentrations from 0.001 to
ion are very similar to those of the parent o-QM. However, 0.1 M. The kinetic solvent isotopic effect on the acid-
the rate of hydration of 2 in aqueous sodium hydroxide catalyzed hydration of 2 (kHþ/kDþ = 0.48) is very similar to
solution is somewhat reduced in comparison to that of parent that of the parent o-QM (kHþ/kDþ = 0.42).5b Such an inverse
quinone methide (kOH = (3.0 104 M-1 s-1).17 This is again solvent isotopic effect is attributed to the rapid pre-equilib-
attributed to the reduced electrophilicity of this o-QM due to rium substrate protonation and is due to the fact that acids are
electron-donating substituents in the ring.5d On the other hand, weaker in D2O and the fraction of more reactive protonated
the hydroxide ion catalysis of the decay of 1 is more than three species 2þ grows faster with Dþ concentration than with Hþ.20
times stronger than that of 2. This higher reactivity is due to the The hydration reaction of 2 on the plateau region was slower in
fact that the second pathway open to o-QM 1, i.e., ketonization D2O (kH2O/kD2O = 1.63). The nature of this isotope effect stems
to 5, is also catalyzed by a specific base. from the fact that positively charged O-H bonds, such as those
The rate profiles of Figure 6 are readily understood in in the intermediate 8 (Scheme 5), are looser than uncharged
terms of the reaction Scheme 5. Thus, the major reaction O-H bonds, such as those in a water molecule. Conversion
consuming o-QM 2 in aqueous solutions is hydration to 4a. of H2O into ROH2þ leads to a loosening of the hydrogenic
o-QM 1, on the other hand, reacts via two pathways: hydra- environment of the species involved, and that produces an
tion to form 3a and ketonization to p-quinone 5 (Scheme 5). isotope effect in the normal direction. Since the major reaction
The hydration mechanism of both o-QM 1 and 2 is very of the o-QM 1 within the pH 3-10 range is addition of water to
similar to that of the parent o-QM.4b In the base-catalyzed produce 3a, the observed solvent isotope effect (kH2O/kD2O =
region of the rate profiles hydration apparently occurs via 1.49) is similar to that of 2. In a sharp contrast with 2, the isotope
the rate-limiting attack of the hydroxide ion on the methide effect on acid-catalyzed (pH <3) reactions of 1 is in the normal
carbon of o-QMs 1 and 2. Specific acid catalysis at pH <3 direction (kHþ/kDþ=1.60). This observation can be explained by
should be assigned to the rapid pre-equilibrium protonation the fact that ketonization to methyl-p-quinone (5) becomes an
of the o-QM, which produces the more reactive cation 1þ/2þ increasingly important pathway of the o-QM 1 decay at higher
(Scheme 5). The uncatalyzed portion of the rate profile at pH acidities. The ketonization reaction, which is known to proceed
between 4 and 10 has two possible interpretations. The first is via rate-determining proton transfer, is expected to produce a
reversible protonation of the o-QMs by water, followed by rate- normal kinetic isotope effect (Scheme 5).20,21
determining cation capture by the hydroxide ion so formed. As Buffer Catalysis. The rate of o-QM 2 hydration shows
in the case of parent o-QM, this mechanism can be ruled out on virtually no dependence on the concentration of phosphate
the basis of the fact that it would require an impossibly large and bicarbonate buffer, resembling the behavior of the
value of the rate constant for its rate-determining step.19 The parent o-QM.17 This observation agrees well with the nucleo-
more probable mechanism of the pH-independent hydration is philic hydration mechanism (Scheme 5). However, in the
simple nucleophilic attack of water on the o-QM methylene acetate buffer solutions, the rate of decay of o-QM 2 shows
group, with or without simultaneous proton transfer to avoid a significant buffer catalysis. Rate measurements were per-
zwitterionic intermediate 8 (Scheme 5). formed in four series of solutions of varying acetate buffer
Hydration of o-QM 1 to diol 3a is accompanied by the concentrations but constant buffer ratio in each series.
tautomerization to methyl-p-quinone (5), which also shows Slopes of buffer dilution plots at various buffer ratios
acid and base catalysis. Conversion of o-QM 1 to 5 is, in fact, represent pH-independent catalysis by the buffer compo-
a vinylogous ketonization reaction. Such a process usually nents. As is evident from Figure 8, the efficiency of acetate
proceeds via rate-limiting proton transfer on a δ-carbon of a
conjugated enol and, therefore, is catalyzed by general and (20) Kresge, A. J.; More O’Ferrall, R. A.; Powell, M. F. In Isotopes in
Organic Chemistry; Buncel, E., Lee, C. C., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 1987;
specific acids.19 Within the pH-independent part of the rate Chapter 4.
profile water takes over as the major protonating species. At (21) (a) Capon, B.; Siddhanta, A. K.; Zucco, C. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
3580. (b) Chiang, Y.; Guo, H.-X.; Kresge, A. J.; Tee, O. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
pH >9, the fraction of o-QM 1 existing in more reactive 1996, 118, 3386. (c) Chiang, Y.; Kresge, A. J.; Santaballa, J. A.; Wirz, J.
enolate form 9 grows with increasing pH producing an J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5506. (d) Pruszynski, P.; Chiang, Y.; Kresge,
apparent hydroxide ion catalysis (Scheme 5). A. J.; Schepp, N. P.; Walsh, P. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3760. (e) Chiang,
Y.; Kresge, A. J.; Nikolaev, V. A.; Popik, V. V J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 190,
Solvent isotope effects on the rate of o-QMs 1 and 2 11183. (f) Capponi, M.; Gut, I. G.; Hellrung, B.; Persy, G.; Wirz, J. Can. J.
consumption provide additional support for the mechanism Chem. 1999, 77, 605.
General Methods. All organic solvents were dried and freshly (26) Murov, S. L.; Carmichael, I.; Hug, G. L. In Handbook of Photo-
distilled before use. Flash chromatography was performed with chemistry; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993; p 299.
40-63 μm silica gel. All NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 (27) Bates, R. G. Determination of pH Theory and Practice; Wiley: New York,
and referenced to TMS unless otherwise noted. Solutions were 1973; p 49.
(28) Berlman, I. B. Handbook of Fluorescence Spectra of Aromatic
prepared with HPLC grade water, methanol, and acetonitrile. Molecules; Academic Press: New York, 1971; p 473.
Substrate concentration for kinetics experiments was kept at ca. (29) Casiraghi, G.; Casnati, G.; Puglia, G.; Sartori, G. Synthesis 1980, 2,
1 10-4 M for 3a and 4a and 5 10-5 M for 3c and 4c. 124.
(30) Ono, M.; Kawashima, H.; Nonaka, A.; Kawai, T.; Haratake, M.;
Mori, H.; Kung, M. P.; Kung, H. F.; Saji, H.; Nakayama, M. J. Med. Chem.
(25) (a) Wehry, E. L.; Rogers, L. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 4234. 2006, 49, 2725.
(b) Stalin, T.; Devi, R. A.; Rajendiran, N. Spectrochim. Acta 2005, 61A, 2495. (31) Bray, C. D. Synlett 2008, 16, 2500.
for 3 h at rt and poured onto crushed ice. The aqueous layer was 137 (52), 136 (40), 123 (12), 108 (17), 94 (12), 73 (17), 70 (37), 61
extracted with ethyl acetate and dried over sodium sulfate; (50), 53 (27), 44 (62), 45 (100). FW calcd for C10H16NO2þ
solvents were removed under vacuum. The crude product was 182.1181; EI-HRMS found 182.1188.
purified by column chromatography (40% dichloromethane in 2-Ethoxy-6-hydroxychroman (6). A solution of 3a (42 mg, 0.3
hexane) to give 4b as a yellow oil (366 mg, 62%). 1H NMR δ 7.27 mmol) and ethyl vinyl ether (2.9 mL, 30 mmol) in aqueous
(br s, 1H), 6.72-6.80 (m, 2H), 6.56-6.57 (m, 1H), 4.64 (s, 2H), acetonitrile (1:1, 300 mL) was irradiated, using a mini-Rayonet
3.72 (s, 3H), 3.58 (q, 2H, J = 5.2 Hz), 1.25 (t, 3H, 5.2 Hz). 13C photochemical reactor equipped with 254 nm lamps for 1 h.
NMR δ 153.2, 150.3, 123.3, 117.3, 114.5, 113.9, 72.3, 66.5, 56.0, Photolysate was extracted with ethyl acetate and dried over
15.3. GC-MS m/z (%) 182 (20), 136 (100), 137 (20), 108 (45), 79 sodium sulfate; solvents were removed under vacuum. The
(20), 65 (20). FW calcd for C10H14O3þ 182.0943; EI-HRMS residue was separated by chromatography (20% EtOAc in
found 182.0943. hexane) to give 53 mg (90%) of 6 as a colorless oil. 1H NMR
(2,5-Dihydroxy-1-phenyl)methyltrimethylammonium Iodide (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.69-6.70 (m, 1H), 6.53-6.60 (m, 2H),
(3c). A solution of 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (900 mg, 6.67 5.20 (t, 1H, J = 2.8 Hz), 3.82-3.88 (m, 1H), 3.59-3-64 (m,
mmol) in methanol (15 mL) was added to a mixture of 1.16 g 1H), 2.88-2.97 (m, 1H), 2.60, 2.55-2.59 (m, 1H), 1.88-2.03 (m,
(14.2 mmol) of dimethylamine hydrochloride, sodium acetate 2H), 1.18 (t, 3H, 7.6 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.3,
(0.91 g, 11.1 mmol), and 0.49 g (7.7 mmol) of sodium cyanobor- 146.3, 123.71, 117.8, 115.6, 114.5, 96.9, 63.8, 26.7, 20.9, 15.3. GC
ohydride in methanol (30 mL).The pH of the solution was MS m/z 195 (10), 194 (90), 149 (30), 148 (70), 147 (100), 122 (50),
maintained throughout the reaction in the range 7-8 by the 94 (30), 77 (20), 65 (25), 55 (28), 45 (15). FW calcd for C11H14O3
addition of concentrated HCl. The solution was stirred at room 194.0943, EI-HRMS found 194.0952.
temperature during 24 h. Acetone (50 mL) was added and the 2-Ethoxy-6-methoxychroman (7). Compound 7 was prepared
solution was acidified to pH 2-3 with 6 N HCl solution. in 91% yield following the same procedure that was described
Solvents were removed under vacuum, and the residue was for 6. The spectral properties are consistent with the previously
redissolved in water (15 mL) and washed with ether (4 15 reported values.32 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.69-6.78(m,
mL). NaOH solution was added to the remaining aqueous phase 2H), 6.61-6.62 (m, 1H), 5.23 (t, 1H, J = 2.8 Hz), 3.84-3.90 (m,
until pH reached 8-9. The resulting aqueous solution was 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.60-3-66 (m, 1H), 2.94-3.02 (m, 1H),
extracted with ether (6 25 mL), the organic layer was dried 2.60-2.66 (m, 2H), 1.90-2.07 (m, 2H), 1.20 (t, 3H, J = 7.6
over MgSO4, and solvent was removed under vacuum. The Hz). 13C NMR of 2 (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.8, 146.3, 123.5,
fractional distillation of amber oil residue produced 0.8 g of pure 117.7, 114.1, 113.5, 97.0, 63.8, 55.9, 26.8, 21.2, 15.4. GC MS m/z
2-(N,N-dimethylaminomethyl)benzene-1,4-diol (71% yield) as 208 (100), 180 (5), 163 (30), 162 (35), 161 (40), 147 (8), 136 (75),
a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.62-6.50 (m, 108 (27), 91 (12), 73 (12), 65 (12), 55 (7), 43 (5). FW calcd for
3H), 3.54 (s, 2H), 2.28 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) C12H16O3 208.1099, EI-HRMS found 208.1102.
δ 151.1, 149.9, 123.0, 116.1, 115.4, 115.0, 62.6, 43.9. GC-MS
m/z (%) 168 (10), 167 (45), 152 (6), 122 (12), 94 (15), 58 (25), Acknowledgment. The authors thank the National
44 (100). Science Foundation (CHE-0449478) and the donors of the
Methyl iodide (1.5 mL) was added to a stirred solution (0 °C) ACS Petroleum Research Fund (434444-AC4) for the sup-
of 2-(N,N-dimethylaminomethyl)benzene-1,4-diol (450 mg, 2.5 port of this project.
mmol) in acetonitrile (1.5 mL) and the mixture was stirred for 2 h
at rt. Anhydrous ether (25 mL) was added to the reaction Supporting Information Available: Tables of raw kinetic
mixture, and white precipitate separated and was washed with measurements and NMR spectra of newly synthesized com-
ether to give 0.8 g (98%) of quaternary ammonium salt 3c as a pounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 6.78-6.86 (m, 3H), at http://pubs.acs.org.
4.29 (s, 2H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.99 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
D2O) δ 150.0, 148.7, 120.6, 119.7, 117.8, 115.4, 64.1, 52.7. GC- (32) Manetsch, R.; Zheng, L.; Reymond, M. T.; Woggon, W.-D.; Reymond,
MS m/z (%) 182 (7), 181 (45), 168 (10), 168 (5), 167 (30), 149 (8), J.-L. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10, 2487.