Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters in Edible Oils: Application Note - An172

Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters in Edible Oils
APPLICATION NOTE - AN172
Introduction
In 2018 FDA stated that “Supportive but not Health benefits and high intrinsic value associated with
conclusive scientific evidence suggests that daily extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) have, as the other side of
consumption of about 1½ tablespoons (20 grams) of a coin, a growing incidence of products adulteration
oils containing high levels of oleic acid, may reduce along all the supply chain. This fraudulent attitude has
the risk of coronary heart disease. To achieve this become a major international financial and regulatory
possible benefit, oleic acid-containing oils should issue.
replace fats and oils higher in saturated fat and not
increase the total number of calories you eat in a day.”
Most countries refer to the International Olive EXPERIMENTAL
Council Standards, an international organization
Sample
involved in the development of physical and chemical
tests for olive oils and olive-pomace oils aimed at
A standard mixture of 37-component FAMEs
differentiating between each grade and at checking
was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The standard
product authenticity.
mixture containing C4-C24 FAMEs in the 200-400ng/
Trade standards to be applied to olive oils and olive
µL concentration range.
pomace oils that are object of international trade or
In order to perform a GC analysis of oils, non-
food transactions are collected in COI/T.15/NC No3/
volatile analytes have to be transesterified into
Rev.12 – June 2018
thermally stable, volatile Fatty Acid Methyl Esters.
As Virgin olive oils are oils which are obtained from
At this regard, samples of extra virgin olive oil
the fruit of the olive tree (Olea europea L.) solely by
(EVO oil), virgin oil, corn oil and adulterated EVO
mechanical or other physical means under conditions,
oil were analyzed as methyl esters after suitable
particularly thermal conditions, that do not lead to
derivatization reaction. A 250mg of oil sample was
alterations in the oil, and which have not undergone
weighed in a 20mL vial, 5mL of hexane and 0.25mL
any treatment other than washing, decantations,
of 2N methanolic potassium hydroxide solution
centrifugation and filtration. Extra Virgin Olive Oil
were added. The solution obtained was shaken
(EVOO) is virgin olive oil which has a free acidity,
vigorously for 1 minute and then left to separate
expressed as oleic acid, of not more than 0.80 grams
until the formation of the two phases was obtained.
per 100 grams and the other physic-chemical and
The supernatant was then taken and injected into
organoleptic characteristics of which correspond to
the GC.
those fixed for this category in this standard.
The International Olive Council has produced a list of
the allowable levels for each of the fatty acids to be
acceptable as extra virgin olive oil.
The determination of fatty acids for the evaluation of
several purity criteria is one of the analyses included
in the official regulations for the control of olive and
olive pomace oils.
According to the international regulations, the
analysis of fatty acids is performed by GC-FID. The
determination of fatty acids require the preparation of
the fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) for the subsequent
analysis by gas chromatography with good precision
and reproducibility.
In the present work FAMEs are analysed by DANI
Master GC. The analysis has been performed on a
standard mixture and then on commercially available
oils (extra virgin olive oil, virgin olive oil, seeds oil).
An evaluation of possible oil adulteration has been
conducted on the obtained results comparing the
amounts of selected compounds to the guidelines
provided by the official methods.
System Configuration and Control Master GC
Column DN-10 50m - 0.25mm - 0.20µm
To perform the analyses, a DANI Master GC – Gas Oven Temp. Program 60°C hold 6 minutes, 2°C/min to 240°C (2min)
PTV Injector 40°C, 999°C/min to 260°C (3min)
Chromatograph equipped with a PTV Injector and
Split Ratio 1:80
FID detector was used. Samples were introduced Carrier Gas Flow (He) 1.2 mL in constant flow
by means of Master AS – Automatic Liquid Sampler FID Temp. 250°C
– Single Injection Mode. Master AS offered the Injected Volume 0.8 µL
complete automation of the sample introduction
operations providing increased repeatability, Table 1: Master GC Analytical Conditions
sample throughput and, consequently, productivity.
Instrumental conditions are summarized in Table 1
on the right.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The cyanopropyl polysiloxane stationary phase was used to improve the separation of cis-trans FAMEs and
also this kind of column is able to resolve the typical coelutions of some components of 37 FAMEs MIX, for
example C18:3n6 and C20:0; C20:3n6 and C22:0; C20:3n3, C20:4n6 and C22:1n9.
Figure 1 shows the separation of the 37-component FAMEs MIX using a DN-10 column ad PTV-GC-FID.
FIGURE 1: CHROMATOGRAM OF 37 FAMES MIX

37 FAMES MIX
COMPOUND NAME ABBREVIATION Abbreviation Retention Time RSD% Area RSD%
Butyric Acid Methyl ester C4:0 C4:0 0.16 2.6
Caproic Acid Methyl ester C6:0 C6:0 0.12 2.34
Caprylic Acid Methyl ester C8:0 C8:0 0,07 2,22
Capric Acid Methyl ester C10:0 C10:0 0,04 2,57
Undecanoic Acid Methyl ester C11:0 C11:0 0,04 2,15
Lauric Acid Methyl ester C12:0
C12:0 0,03 1,37
Tridecanoic Acid Methyl ester C13:0
C13:0 0,02 2,05
Myristic Acid Methyl ester C14:0
C14:0 0,02 1,02
Myristoleic Acid Methyl ester C14:1
C14:1 0,02 1,61
Pentadecanoic Acid Methyl ester C15:0
C15:0 0,02 2,02
cis-10-Pentadecenoic Acid Methyl ester C15:1
C15:1 0,02 1,40
Palmitic Acid Methyl ester C16:0
Palmitoleic Acid Methyl ester C16:1 C16:0 0,02 2,71
Heptadecanoic Acid Methyl ester C17:0 C16:1 0,02 1,88
cis-10-Heptadecanoic Acid Methyl ester C17:1 C17:0 0,01 2,48
Stearic Acid Methyl ester C18:0 C17:1 0,01 2,56
Elaidic Acid Methyl ester C18:1n9 trans C18:0 0,02 2,82
Oleic Acid Methyl ester C18:1n9 cis C18:1n9 trans 0,02 2,38
Linolelaidic Acid Methyl ester C18:2n6 trans C18:1n9 cis 0,01 2,39
Linoleic Acid Methyl ester C18:2n6 cis C18:2n6 trans 0,01 2,43
γ-Linolenic Acid Methyl ester C18:3n6 C18:2n6 cis 0,01 2,09
Arachidic Acid Methyl ester C20:0 C18:3n6 0,01 2,64
Linolenic Acid Methyl ester C18:3n3 C20:0 0,01 2,01
cis-11-Eicosenoic Acid Methyl ester C20:1n9 C18:3n3 0,01 2,29
Heneicosanoic Acid Methyl ester C21:0 C20:1n9 0,01 1,37
cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic Acid Methyl ester C20:2 C21:0 0,01 2,48
cis-8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic Acid Methyl ester C20:3n6 C20:2 0,01 1,53
Behenic Acid Methyl ester C22:0
C20:3n6 0,01 2,70
cis-11,14,17-Eicosatrienoic Acid Methyl ester C20:3n3
C22:0 0,01 2,52
Arachidonic Acid Methyl ester C20:4n6
C20:3n3 0,01 2,69
Erucic Acid Methyl ester C22:1n9
C20:4n6 0,01 2,57
Tricosanoic Acid Methyl ester C23:0
C22:1n9 0,01 2,95
cis-13,16-Docosadienoic Acid Methyl ester C22:2
C23:0 0,01 1,72
cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic Acid Methyl ester C20:5n3
Lignoceric Acid Methyl ester C24:0 C22:2 0,01 1,58
Nervonic Acid Methyl ester C24:1n9 C20:5n3 0,01 1,80
cis-4,7,10,13,16,19-Docosahexaenoic Acid Methyl ester C22:6n3 C24:0 0,01 1,71
C24:1n9 0,01 1,97
C22:6n3 0,01 2,34
Table 2: 37-FAMEs MIX Table 3: RSD% of Retention Time and Area Obtained with 6
consecutive injections
The repeatability was evaluated on 6 consecutive injections of FAMEs standard solution. The repeatability
could be a critical aspect of this analysis considering the evaporation of the solvent and sample and the run
time of a little bit more than 80 minutes. The table 3 lists the RSD% of area and retention time for each peak.
Figure2. Overlay of 6 chromatograms of 37-FAMEs MIX
Real oil samples were extracted, methylated and analyzed.

Figures 3,4,5 show the results obtained for Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Virgin Olive Oil, and Corn Oil.
Chromatograms show that both Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Virgin Olive Oil are very rich in oleic acid and poor
in linoleic acid. On the other hand, the analysed seed oil shows an inverse relationship between these two
compounds.
For the Extra Virgin Olive Oil, in fact, an acceptable range in area % for the oleic acid is between 55-83%,
while linoleic acid is typically between 3.5-21%.
The area% of oleic acid in the analysed samples in the present work is 73.11% in Extra Virgin Olive Oil and
74.55% in the Virgin Olive Oil sample, while the linoleic acid was 7.62 % and 8.15% respectively. These values
perfectly fall within the internationally accepted range.
As far as the seed oil is concerned, instead, the amount of the linoleic acid in the corn oil was 53,74%.
The area% of linoleic, oleic and palmitic acids in olive oil can provide some useful information about the
possible geographic origin of the olives/oils.
Italian, Spanish and Greek olive oils are, in fact, high in oleic and low in palmitic acid, while African and
Australian oils are , vice versa, rich in linoleic and lower in oleic acids.
Both the analysed olive oils here were Italian, and the chromatograms confirmed this pattern.
Another aspect that is important to take in consideration is that the majority of the fatty acids in the olive
oils feature only a single double bond (the others are mostly showing single chemical bond). In other edible
oils (i.e. seed oils) there is a higher number of fatty acids with double bonds. In nature, double bonds are in
their cis-form. Under particular conditions, none of which happens naturally, double bonds can turn into
their trans-form. This may happen, for example, upon heating or deodorizing processes.
Figure 5 shows a chromatogram of the analysis of corn oil. Since the final step of the production of corn
oil involves deodorization by distillation at 232-260°C, it is possible to find trans-fatty acids. In fact, Trans-
Palmitoleic Acid Methyl Ester and Trans-Linolelaidic Acid Methyl Ester are present in the chromatogram.
Figure 3. Chromatogram of EVOO oil
Figure 4. Chromatogram of Virgin olive oil

Figure 5. Chromatogram of corn oil
Adulterated Olive Oil

As previously stated, genuine Extra Virgin Olive Oil does not contain any trans-fatty acid. If found, like in the
example shown in Figure 6, it is clear that the oil has been adulterated.
As a further confirmation, we can take in consideration the oleic / linoleic acid ratio, although this value can
vary strongly according to many variables such as weather, temperatures etc. This ratio is not mentioned in
the international regulations, however it is often used as a stability parameter. Ideally, a good Extra Virgin
Olive Oil should show a oleic / linoleic ratio greater or equal to 7.
The Extra Virgin Olive Oil used as a sample here, in fact, has a 9.14 ratio. In the adulterated oil, instead, this
value is only 3,93.
Figure 6. Chromatogram of Adulterated Olive Oil

CONCLUSIONS
The DANI Master GC Gas Chromatograph equipped a PTV injector and FID
detector, along with the DANI Master AS Automatic Liquid Sampler, allowed the
determination of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters with excellent accuracy and precision.
The solution described in the present work has proven to be robust and reliable,
as seen in the repeatability results.
Furthermore, it has been proved that with this solution it is possible to identify
possible adulterations
www.dani-analitica.com
The contents of this publication are for reference and illustrative

purposes only. Information, descriptions and specification are
subjected to change without notice. DANI Analitica assumes no
responsability and will not be liable for any errors or omissions
contained herein or for incidental, consequential damages or
losses in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of
this material.
AN_172

Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters in Edible Oils: Application Note - An172

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters in Edible Oils: Application Note - An172

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters in Edible Oils: Application Note - An172

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters in Edible Oils

APPLICATION NOTE - AN172

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

FIGURE 1: CHROMATOGRAM OF 37 FAMES MIX

Figure2. Overlay of 6 chromatograms of 37-FAMEs MIX

Real oil samples were extracted, methylated and analyzed.

Figure 3. Chromatogram of EVOO oil

Figure 4. Chromatogram of Virgin olive oil

Adulterated Olive Oil

Figure 6. Chromatogram of Adulterated Olive Oil

The contents of this publication are for reference and illustrative

You might also like