MM 5009 Financial Management Yeats Valves and Control Inc.: Group 10
MM 5009 Financial Management Yeats Valves and Control Inc.: Group 10
MM 5009 Financial Management Yeats Valves and Control Inc.: Group 10
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
YEATS VALVES AND CONTROL INC.
Group 10
2016
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Yeats Valves and Control Inc., headquarter at Innisfree, California, was principally engaged in the
manufacture of speciality valves and heat exchangers. The company was an outgrowth of a small
company organized in 1980 for engineering and developmental work on experimental heat exchanger
product. In 1987, Yeats Va;ves and Control Inc. Was organized to acquire the patents and properties
borh owned and leased, of the engineering corporation. Bill Yeats is founder and CEO of Yeats
Valves. There were 560 stochoders of Yaets Valves and Control Inc. And roughtly 70 percent of the
stock was held within the board of directors and their family, including 20 percent owned by Auden
Company and 40 percent owned by Bill Yeats.
In early May 2000, W.B. “Bill” Yeats, chairman, CEO, and founder of Yeats Valves and Control
Inc., met Edna Millay, an investment banker and member of Yeats Valves’ board of directors to
discuss the proposed acquisition of Yeats Valves by TSE International Corporation. Serious
negotiations for combining the two companies had started in March, following casual conversations
dating back to late 1999. Before entering final negotiations with Tom Eliot, CEO of TSE International
Corporation, Yeats wanted to hear Edna Millay’s opinion of the TSE International proposition and
obtain her advice about price and negotiation strategy.
I. Objective
To determine the decision about the merger between Yeats Valves and Control Inc. With TSE
International, wether it is good to the company to merger or not. Will it bring benefit to company? We
use ADCF, PR Ratio, Book Value, and Market value to analyze it.
II. Analysis
2.1 Yeats Valves and Control Inc
2.1.1 WACC Yeats Valves and Control Inc
Debt =$0
A. Cost of Equity
rs = Rf + [β x (rm – Rf)]
Rf = risk-free rate of return
Rm = market return
2
Β : 1,5
Rf : 5,98 %
Premium risk (rm – Rf ) : 5,5 %
rs = Rf + [ β x (rm – Rf) ] : 14,23%
Debt of Yaets Valves is zero (0) so in this company they use 100% of equity. It’s because
Yealts Valves is a small company. If, them is a huge company it’s not good to use 100% equity in
their business.
D
WACC Yeats Valves=K d (1−t ) × + K e × E/(D+ E)
D+ E
= 0% + 14,23% × 100 %
= 14,23%
3
FCF 2005
Value of FCF 2005 =
r a−g FCF
7.060.000 x (1+0,089)
=
0,1423−0,089
= $ 144.246.529
Table 3. Proportion
Prefered Stock $ 27.783.200 2,31%
Common Stock $ 1.053.265.265 87,76%
Long Term Debt $ 119.100.000 9,92%
Total Capital $ 1.200.148.465 100,00%
A. Cost of Equity
rs = Rf + [β x (rm – Rf)]
4
B. Cost of Prefered Stock
C. Cost of Debt
ri = rd x (1 – T)
rd = interest rate
T = Tax (we asumed tax is 40%, based on tax in 1999)
rd : 9,6 %
Tax : 40 %
ri = rd x (1 – T) : 5,76 %
The cost of debt for TSE International before tax is 9,6% and the cost of debt after tax for
TSE International is 5,76%.
5
FCF 2005
Value of FCF 2005 =
r a−g FCF
= $ 8.074.439.320
Table 5. Calculation of the Value of the Entire Company for TSE International
Year FCF (1+r a )t PV FCF
1999 $ 98.603 1,100 $ 89.672
2000 $ 106.511 1,209 $ 88.090
2001 $ 115.053 1,330 $ 86.535
2002 $ 124.280 1,462 $ 85.009
2003 $ 134.248 1,608 $ 83.509
2004 $ 8.219.453 1,768 $ 4.649.803
Value of entire company, Vc = $ 5.082.618
Value per Share = $ 81.1
Table 6. Proportion
Prefered Stock $ 27.783.200 2,21%
Common Stock $ 1.110.577.265 88,32%
Long Term Debt $ 119.100.000 9,47%
Total Capital $ 1.257.460.465 100%
Common stock in this part is the sum of Yeats Valves and Control Inc. And TSE International capital.
D. Cost of Equity
rs = Rf + [β x (rm – Rf)]
6
Cost of Prefered Stock = 2%
F. Cost of Debt
ri = rd x (1 – T)
rd = interest rate
T = Tax (we asumed tax is 40%, based on tax in 1999)
rd : 9,6 %
Tax : 40 %
ri = rd x (1 – T) : 5,76 %
So the cost of debt for TSE International before tax is 9,6% and the cost of debt after tax for
TSE International is 5,76%.
FCF 2005
Value of FCF 2005 =
r a−g FCF
7
152.074 .000 x (1+0,0932)
=
0,1−0,0932
= $ 24.448.131.882
Table 8. Calculation of the Value of the Entire Company for TSE International
t
Year FCF (1+r a ) PV FCF
1999 $ 105.686 1,100 $ 96.078
2000 $ 111.200 1,210 $ 91.901
2001 $ 119.637 1,331 $ 89.885
2002 $ 129.582 1,464 $ 88.507
2003 $ 140.376 1,611 $ 87.162
2004 $ 24.448.132 1,772 $ 13.800.333
Value of entire company, Vc = $ 14.253.866
Value per Share = $ 222.3
Table 9. PE Ratio
P/E in the Industrial P/E in the Industrial
EPS of Yeats EPS of TSE
Machinery Sector Machinery Sector
3,87 8,2 2,23 8,2
10,3 10,3
11 11
14,6 14,6
16.3 16,3
7 7
10,7 10,7
10,4 10,4
Average P/E 11,063 Average P/E 11,063
Value per Value per share
42.812 24.669
share for Yeats for TSE
Based on the table above, we can see Yeats’s PER is higher than TSE’s
8
2.5 Book Value
To calculate book value per share, we used the following formula.
Σ assets−Σ liabilities
Book Value per Share=
Σ shares o utstanding
From table above, we can see that the book value per share from the Yeats is higher
than TSE’s.
Based on exhibit 7, market value for Yeats on May 1, 2000 is $39.75, and market
value for TSE International is $21.98. It shows that market price of Yeats is higher than TSE.
Which means, the demand for Yeats share are higher than the TSE.
From the explanation above, we can conclude that the merger between Yeats and TSE
will be benefit for both of them. It can be seen from the value per share that was resulted after
merger. The DCF calculation above shows us that the value of the merge company is bigger
than the sum of value of each company before merger (Graph 1). It means that there will be a
good synergy. So we need to calculate the minimum stock price.
9
DCF $ 61 60% $ 36.35
PER $ 42,81 20% $ 8.56
BV $ 25,53 10% $ 2.55
Market Price $ 128.92 10% $ 12.89
Minimum Stock Price $ 60.36
We also calculated the amount money that TSE has to pay to merger with Yeats. Here
the calculation,
Yeats market capitalization = Minimum stock price x Total shares outstanding
= $ 60.36 x 1.440.000
= $ 86.918.400
10
4. They must create a database system to improve their company performance.
11