Show Multidocs

CASE 0:21-cv-00371-WMW-KMM Doc.
1 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Kacey White (individually), Charles Stotts

(individually), and d/b/a Town Talk Court File No.:
Diner & Gastropub,
Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF

ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT
v.
City of Minneapolis, Mayor Jacob Frey,
Defendants.
TO: Plaintiffs above-named and their attorneys, Michael Healey, Nathan

Serr and Cassandra Kuebler, Wagner Falconer & Judd, Ltd., 100 South
Fifth Street, Suite 800, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 1441 and 1446, Defendants,
through their attorneys, Heather P. Robertson, Kristin R. Sarff, and Sharda
Enslin, Assistant Minneapolis City Attorneys, 350 S. Fifth Street, Room 210,
Minneapolis, MN 55415, hereby remove this action from the Fourth Judicial
District of the State of Minnesota to this Court, and gives notice to the Plaintiffs
and this Court as follows:
1. The City of Minneapolis and Mayor Jacob Frey (collectively
“Defendants”) are defendants in a civil action in the District Court of the Fourth
Judicial District of the State of Minnesota entitled Kacey White (individually),
Charles Stotts (individually), and d/b/a Town Talk Diner & Gastropub. The original
CASE 0:21-cv-00371-WMW-KMM Doc. 1 Filed 02/08/21 Page 2 of 4
Summons and Complaint were received by counsel for Defendants on January 7,
2021. An Amended Complaint was received on February 8, 2021. Counsel for
Defendants waived formal service of process. No other pleadings have been
served. No pleadings have been filed in Hennepin County District Court. No
further proceedings have occurred in this matter.
2. This Notice of Removal is filed within 30 days of Defendant’s receipt
of the complaint and is therefore timely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1).
3. A copy of the Summons is attached as Exhibit 1. A copy of the
Complaint is attached as Exhibit 2. A copy of the Amended Complaint is
attached as Exhibit 3.
4. This Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court is filed pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) and (c). The Plaintiffs’ lawsuit, being captioned in the State
Court, is a civil action bringing claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. §
1986, alleging that Defendants violated the Plaintiffs’ rights under the U.S.
Constitution, federal statutory law, and state statutory claims, resulting in injury
to the Plaintiffs.
5. The Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’
constitutional civil rights and asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C.
§ 1986. These are claims over which this Court has original jurisdiction pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1343, as they arise under the laws of the United States within the
2
meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and these claims are therefore removable under 28
U.S.C. § 1441.
6. The Amended Complaint also asserts pendent common law claims
under Minnesota law. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s
state claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).
7. Defendants file herewith copies of all process, pleadings and orders
served upon them in this action. Defendants have sent written notice of the
filing of this Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court to Plaintiff and will
promptly file a copy of this Notice with the Clerk of the District Court for the
Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Defendants sign this removal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
11.
WHEREFORE, notice is hereby given that this action is removed from the
State Court to this Court for trial or such other determination as this Court may
make regarding the action and in accordance with its jurisdictional limits under
28 U.S.C. § 1441.
3
Dated: February 8, 2021 JAMES R. ROWADER, JR.

City Attorney
By
/s/ Heather P. Robertson
HEATHER P. ROBERTSON (#0390470)
KRISTIN R. SARFF (#0388003)
SHARDA ENSLIN (#0389370)
Assistant City Attorneys
Attorneys for Defendants
City Hall, Room 210
350 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55415
(612) 673-3949
4
CASE 0:21-cv-00371-WMW-KMM Doc. 1-1 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 32
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Kacey White (individually),

Charles Stotts (individually), and
d/b/a Town Talk Diner & Gastropub, PLAINTIFFS' SUMMONS
Plaintiff(s),
Civil No: __________________
vs.
City of Minneapolis,
Mayor Jacob Frey,
Defendant(s).
THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS BY AND

THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: GREGORY SAUTTER, OFFICE OF THE
CITY ATTORNEY, 350 S. FIFTH STREET, ROOM 210, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415.
1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiffs have started a lawsuit against you. The
Plaintiffs' Complaint against you is attached to this Summons. Do not throw these papers away.
They are official papers that affect your rights. You must respond to this lawsuit even though it
may not yet be filed with the Court and there may be no court file number on this Summons.
2. YOU MUST REPLY WITHIN 21 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS. You must
give or mail to the person who signed this summons a written response called an Answer within
21 days of the date on which you received this Summons. You must send a copy of your Answer
to the person who signed this Summons located at:
Michael Healey
Wagner, Falconer, & Judd, Ltd.
Suite 800
3. YOU MUST RESPOND TO EACH CLAIM. The Answer is your written response to
the Plaintiffs' Complaint. In your Answer you must state whether you agree or disagree with
each paragraph of the Complaint. If you believe the Plaintiffs should not be given everything
asked for in the Complaint, you must say so in your Answer.
4. YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CASE IF YOU DO NOT SEND A WRITTEN

RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT TO THE PERSON WHO SIGNED THIS
SUMMONS. If you do not answer within 21 days, you will lose this case. You will not get to
tell your side of the story, and the Court may decide against you and award the Plaintiffs
Ex. 1
everything asked for in the Complaint. If you do not want to contest the claims stated in the
Complaint, you do not need to respond. A default judgment can then be entered against you for
the relief requested in the Complaint.
5. LEGAL ASSISTANCE. You may wish to get legal help from a lawyer. If you do not
have a lawyer, the Court Administrator may have information about places where you can get
legal assistance. Even if you cannot get legal help, you must still provide a written Answer to
protect your rights or you may lose the case.
6. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties may agree to or be ordered to

participate in an alternative dispute resolution process under Rule 114 of the Minnesota General
Rules of Practice. You must still send your written response to the Complaint even if you expect
to use alternative means of resolving the dispute.
Dated: 01/07/21 WAGNER, FALCONER, & JUDD, LTD.
s/ Michael B. Healey_______________
Michael B. Healey, #0389283
Nathan B. Serr, #0339386
Cassandra M. Kuebler, #0402161
100 South Fifth Street, Suite 800
Telephone: (612) 339-1421
Facsimile: (612) 392-3999
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
Ex. 1


d/b/a Town Talk Diner & Gastropub, PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff(s),
vs. Civil No: __________________
Mayor Jacob Frey,
Defendant(s).
TO: THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY OF

RECORD: GREGORY SAUTTER, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, 350 SOUTH 5TH
STREET, ROOM 210, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415
Plaintiffs hereby allege as follows:
PARTIES
1. Kacey White ("Kacey") and Charles Stotts ("Charles") (collectively "Plaintiffs")
are residents of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
2. Kacey and Charles are the owners of Town Talk Diner & Gastropub (“Town
Talk”) located at 2707 East Lake Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
3. Defendant the City of Minneapolis (“the City”) is a municipality incorporated in
the State of Minnesota.
4. Defendant Jacob Frey ("Mayor Frey") is the Mayor and chief executive of the
City, and resides in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ex. 2
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. Jurisdiction is proper in Hennepin County, Minnesota because Kacey and Charles
reside in Hennepin County and the events giving rise to these claims arose in Hennepin County,
Minnesota, the Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota.
6. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1331
because this action presents federal questions and seeks to redress deprivations of rights under
the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
7. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e)(1) because the events
giving rise to these claims arose in Hennepin County, the Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
A. Background
8. On May 25, 2020, George Floyd died while in the custody of the Minneapolis
Police Department's Third Precinct officers, igniting moral outrage. A racial justice movement
deployed through the City of Minneapolis. Protests began to take place.
9. On May 26, 2020, hundreds of people surrounded the Minneapolis Police
Department's ("MPD") Third Precinct Station on the corner of Minnehaha Ave and East Lake
Street. Violence and destruction occurred in the surrounding area, creating a trail of property
damage.
10. On May 27, 2020 "the situation near Lake Street and Hiawatha in Minneapolis
[had] evolved into an extremely dangerous situation." 1 Fully aware of the serious safety issues
1
https://twitter.com/GovTimWalz/status/1265849420035301384
Ex. 2
they created, Mayor Frey and the City stood back and watched as their failure to follow the
policies in place destroyed the businesses on Lake Street. 2
11. Residents and business owners near the MPD's Third Precinct noticed vehicles
dropping off pallets of bricks and other objects typically used to cause property destruction.
Police were notified and questioned regarding the activity. The residents and business owners
were told to "get the f#$@ out of the area" by the police.
12. On May 28, 2020, the City, at the direction of Mayor Frey, abruptly abandoned
the MPD's Third Precinct Station and the neighborhood streets relying on its protection. Rather
than seeking to restore order and protect the residents and property owners within the Third
Precinct, the City and Mayor Frey instead chose to surrender the area to rioters who set fire to
the community.
13. Kacey, Charles, and others, repeatedly pleaded with Mayor Frey and other local
leaders to put an end to the destruction of their property and the imminent dangers that were
posed to them as their neighborhood went up in flames. But the City and Mayor Frey failed to
protect Kacey and Charles' business, forcing Kacey and Charles to resort to litigation to address
Mayor Frey and the City's unacceptable response.
14. Kacey and Charles are residents and small business owners in the Minneapolis
neighborhood that was harmed by the May 2020 riots. They have worked full time for over four
years designing, stocking, renovating, and improving Town Talk to make it one of South
Minneapolis' finest and most popular restaurants.
2
https://twitter.com/MayorFrey/status/1265876660093685761
Ex. 2
15. Located in a historic building, the local neighborhood diner Town Talk has become
an iconic restaurant on Lake Street. Mayor Frey and the City’s failure to quell several nights of
rioting, fires, and ransacking of local businesses resulted in Town Talk being engulfed in flames
and burnt to the ground.
16. The MPD, National Guard, and Minneapolis Local Leaders have policies in place
to address crowd control.
17. During the days of May 25, 2020 to May 28, 2020, the City and Mayor Frey
continuously deviated from these policies.
18. Due to Mayor Frey and the City’s failure to follow proper policy, Kacey and
Charles suffered irreparable harm by being subject to acts of violence, harassment, trespass, and
vandalism, inability to use their property, loss of police protection and public services, including
police, medical, and fire services; loss of business revenue; reduction in property value;
destruction of property; and other economic and non-economic injuries.
19. On May 29, 2020, the National Guard was mobilized in the City. Following the
policies the National Guard has in place, they restored peace and order to the City.
20. On or about September 22, 2020, Kacey and Charles submitted a request for
information from Mayor Frey and the City pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. To date,
Mayor Frey and the City have failed to respond to this request.
B. The Start of the Protests
21. Since the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, racial justice protests began to
fill the City.
22. Participants of the justice movements occupied the streets and sidewalks of the
City, especially in the neighborhood surrounding the Third Precinct.
Ex. 2
23. Peaceful protests soon developed into riots, creating a public safety concern. 3
3
Scott Newman & Warren Limmer, Joint Transportation & Judiciary & Public Safety Committee, Review of
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020).
Ex. 2
24. As history has demonstrated, the killing of an unarmed black man in police
custody sparks an emphatic societal response.
A. Trayvon Martin, killed by neighborhood watch in Florida in 2012.
B. Michael Brown, killed by a police officer in Missouri in 2014.
C. Philando Castile, killed by a police officer in Minnesota in 2016.
C. EJ Bradford, killed by a police officer in Alabama in 2018.
D. Willie McCoy, killed by a police officer in California in 2019.
25. On May 25, 2020 when indignation began, Minneapolis' local officials were
required to follow proper protocol, including the need to be on heightened alert.
26. However, executive leadership at the local level failed to distinguish between
demonstrators and rioters. Mayor Frey ultimately failed to provide the guidance Minnesotans
expect from their offices. 4
4
Id. at 1.
Ex. 2
27. Mayor Frey initially tried to negotiate with and appease the rioters rather than
give law enforcement the authority to confront criminal acts with enough force to restore law and
order. 5
28. A primary responsibility of local elected officials is to protect the public. The
inaction on the part of Mayor Frey led to an increase in violence. 6
29. Mayor Frey's failure to call for additional police presence on May 25 and 26, 2020
allowed for the "second-most destructive period of local unrest in United States history" to
ensue. 7
C. First Wave of Destruction
30. Two days later, on May 27, 2020, the protests evolved into a manageable number
of destructive crowds. Shortly after 10:30 p.m., that evening, the "situation near Lake Street and
Hiawatha [had] evolved into an extremely dangerous situation." 8
31. That evening, the first plea for everyone to leave the third precinct for the safety
of the public, and to allow firefighters and paramedics to attend to the violence and destruction
was made by Governor Tim Walz ("Governor Walz"). 9
32. The second plea came from Mayor Frey around 12:30 a.m., in the early morning
of May 28, 2020. 10
5
Id.
6
Id.
7
Id. at 6.
8
9
Id.
10
Ex. 2
10
Ex. 2
33. Ignoring the pleas of the Minnesota local leaders, a significant (yet manageable)
number of malefactors took over East Lake Street. For over three hours that morning, East Lake
Street burned. 11
34. The small businesses and homes that weren’t engulfed in flames on that evening
were vandalized and destroyed.
35. The morning of May 28, 2020, Kacey and Charles arrived at Town Talk to assess
the damage after a night of violence and looting, finding the destruction to their restaurant to be
far worse than they could have imagined.
11
https://twitter.com/ryahoward/status/1265904413933293568;
https://twitter.com/ChristianeWCCO/status/1265952993196888064
11
Ex. 2
12
Ex. 2
D. Anticipating the Second Wave – Afternoon of May 28, 2020
36. Kacey and Charles looked at what was left of their historic restaurant, which had
not yet been burned but had been devastated by the amount of destruction. They then boarded up
the windows of Town Talk, hoping to prevent further damage from the riots that every
reasonable person knew would be coming that evening.
13
Ex. 2
37. The media, including WCCO, KARE 11, KSTP, and Fox 9 openly began asking
where the elected leaders were, "what's the plan?", "who is in charge?", and "what are your
resources?" However, Mayor Frey's responsive news conference was "the strangest, most rattled,
evasive, and unclear news conference," providing no answers to the citizens of the City. 12
38. Proactively responding to another anticipated evening of destruction, at 5:00 p.m.
on May 28, 2020, Saint Paul requested that the National Guard be activated for the protection of
their city. No request came at that time from the City of Minneapolis.
39. At 8:30 p.m. that evening, Governor Walz observed that the activity surrounding
Lake Street was no longer appearing to be peaceful. 13
E. The Third Precinct is Abandoned – Evening of May 28, 2020
40. A policy was in place to hold the Third Precinct without a loss of life using the
same non-lethal methods used previously in the week. 14
41. The City has a policy in place in the event of civil unrest. Mayor Frey consciously
chose to deviate from this policy.
42. Mayor Frey failed to acknowledge the seriousness of the situation and failed to
confront the lawlessness.
43. Cheryl Dorsey, a retired police sergeant commented "I do not know what kind of
intelligence they may have over there on that police department. I don't know how they could've
been caught off guard by this. But surely, someone should have realized that this situation was
very different from other incidents." 15
12
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, 16, 18 (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020) (citing 5/29/20
Tom Lunden Tweet).
13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyQFzWo4j1k
14
Id. at 27.
15
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2020.05.29.html
14
Ex. 2
44. As the chaos became more intense due the lack of police, the MPD were forced to
watch the escalation as they waited on a decision to be made by Mayor Frey regarding the Third
Precinct.
45. Minneapolis City Council Member Linea Palmisano stated "You can't let the
Third Precinct go, that would just be the epitome of ultimate chaos in our city," properly pointing
out that the decision should be made consistent with the City's policy. 16
46. Mayor Frey was informed by the MPD that they could hold the precinct solely
using non-lethal methods, but Mayor Frey refused to use those non-lethal methods to protect the
Third Precinct. 17
47. Minneapolis police officers were told they were not allowed to use the tools at
their disposal because it "looks bad," and therefore were not allowed to respond to the rioting in
the way they were trained to respond. 18
48. As Mayor Frey indecisively balanced politics with tactics, ignoring the advice of
Minneapolis' top law enforcement officials, destruction to the Third Precinct quickly escalated. 19
49. Some Minneapolis police officers were informed by the Longfellow Business
Association that "the police would be abandoning the precinct and would be leaving [the citizens
of Minneapolis] to defend for ourselves in the middle of a riot." 20
16
Id.
17
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, 24 (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020) (citing Commander
Gerlicher's Written Testimony).
18
Id. at 25 (citing Hearing 4, 1:27:20-1:27-50).
19
Id. at 27.
20
Id. at 11 (citing Hearing 4, 2:07:23-2:07:44).
15
Ex. 2
50. Due to the failure of Mayor Frey and the City to provide the resources and
personnel needed, the MPD was forced into a defensive position during the rioting with no
ability to safely respond to and stop the looting and arson. 21
51. Commander Scott Gerlicher of the MPD described the destruction and the
inability of local police to control the rioting: "The situation was dire, and we needed assistance
immediately." 22
52. An untimely directive to abandon the Third Precinct finally came from Mayor
Frey through the Chief of Police. 23 Mayor Frey made the decision to evacuate the Third Precinct,
removing police officers from the neighborhood, and leaving the citizens of Lake Street to
defend themselves and their property. 24
53. Minneapolis police officers never had a situation where the Mayor, Governor, and
the Commissioner of Public Safety were making these types of decisions rather than the local
police. 25 Despite it being the MPD's responsibility to make such decisions, Mayor Frey actively
chose to deviate from the chain of command policy in place.
54. The citizens and business owners were not consulted, given an opportunity to
comment, or provided a hearing, regarding the directive to abandon the Third Precinct and to
leave citizens and business owners to fend for themselves.
21
Id. at 18 (citing Commander Gerlicher's Written Testimony).
22
23
24
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2020/05/28/minneapolis-wakes-up-to-destruction-after-night-of-protests
25
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, 24 (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020) (citing Hearing 4,
1:48:17-1:48:50).
16
Ex. 2
55. As the Third Precinct fell it became apparent to the Commissioner of the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety and other State Officials that local leader, Mayor Frey,
could not handle it himself. 26
56. By 10:30 p.m., the Third Precinct had been taken over by rioters. 27
26
Id. (citing Hearing 3, Part 2, 20:11-21:21).
27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvQFzWo4jlk
17
Ex. 2
F. Citizens Abandoned – Evening of May 29, 2020
57. As a result of Mayor Frey's decision to abandon the Third Precinct, one by one,
16 to 26 buildings in Sector Four of the Third Precinct caught fire as well. 28
58. Citizens were then forced to try and protect themselves and their property as it
became clear that the City and Mayor Frey were not keeping them safe. 29
59. With no firefighters in sight, Minneapolis residents, including two members of the
House of Representatives, Aisha Gomez and Hodan Hassan, struggled to put out the fires:
"@RepHassan and I spent 90 minutes trying to get a gas station fire put out. A basic City service.
When I have time and our community isn’t burning I will explain the dizzying game of
jurisdictional hot potato we experienced. This response is unacceptable." (emphasis added). 30
28
https://www.kimt.com/content/news/30-fire-events-including-16-involving-structures-on-one-Minneapolis-street -
570832391.html; https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-news/a-list-of-the-buildings-damaged-looted-in-
minneapolis-and-st-paul
29
Id. at 18.
30
https://twitter.com/RepAishaGomez/status/1266616114257235974
18
Ex. 2
60. When business owners asked how to get police protection, the response was that
they did not know, and that citizens should try to get ahold of Mayor Frey's office or police
chief. There was never an answer from either of those offices. 31
61. Others who called 911 were told that if the situation was not "life threatening"
then the police would not get there for four days. 32
62. Some 911 calls were going completely unanswered. "The most serious types of
911 calls, which are usually responded to immediately, were unanswered for extended periods of
time because of the rioting." 33
63. The delays in response from Mayor Frey and the City, particularly for the most
serious 911 calls, allowed for more rioting, destruction, looting, and violence. 34
64. While the riots were ongoing, Mayor Frey and the Minneapolis City Council did
not call for more police officers on the street.
65. Although stationed nearby, firefighters did not enter the protest zone. 35
66. At one point during the riots, Minneapolis firefighters quit responding to arsons
and only responded to medical emergencies because even they did not feel safe without police
31
32
33
Id. at 17, 18 (citing Hearing 4, 3:23:41-3:24:24; Commander Gerlicher's Written Testimony).
34
Id. at 18.
35
https://twitter.com/maxnesterak/status/1266213485026906113?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembe
d%7Ctwterm%5E1266213485026906113%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mprnews.org%2
Fstory%2F2020%2F05%2F28%2Fminneapolis-wakes-up-to-destruction-after-night-of-protests;
19
Ex. 2
protection. 36
67. As Lake Street businesses continued to burn, local protection was nowhere to be
found. 37 As publicly expressed by Minneapolis citizens:
A. "They didn't protect our people. We were all on our own. The fire engine
was just sitting there, but they wouldn’t do anything." 38
B. "Where is the Police??? Where are the firefighters??? Where is the
National Guard!??? . . . Not much else left on E. Lake St. to set on fire other than homes! . . .
What is next? Who will protect us? What is the plan?" 39
36
1:49:02-1:50:30).
37
Id. at 18.
38
Id. at 9 (citing https://www.startribune.com/manufacturer-that-burned-during-mpls-riots-plans-to-move-out-of-
the-city/571104922/).
39
Id. at 17 (citing City of Minneapolis Data Practice Information 2, pgs. 119-120).
20
Ex. 2
68. At 11:08 p.m. on May 29, 2020, in response to concerned citizens, the National
Guard tweeted that they were in Minneapolis and ready to assist the Minneapolis Fire
Department. However, the National Guard was still not activated. 40
69. At 11:30 p.m., Mayor Frey told the citizens of Minneapolis "for our Minneapolis
firefighters to respond, the area of the fire must be secure so they can focus on fighting the fire
without risking their own safety." 41 However, Mayor Frey did not bring in the National Guard or
MPD into the area to secure it.
70. After over an hour of Lake Street burning, there were still no police officers or
National Guard in sight. 42
71. Sara Sidner, a CNN National Correspondent commented "I have never seen a
situation like this. I've never seen a situation where a precinct, a police department precinct, is on
fire, and there is absolutely no authority out there to try and control the situation." 43
G. Minnesota National Guard is Mobilized
72. After five (5) hours of roaring flames destroying Lake Street, at 3:30 a.m. Town
Talk was set ablaze. Not a single public official, police officer, firefighter or member of the
Minnesota National Guard was around. 44
73. State Senator Patricia Torres Ray ("Ray") called Governor Walz directly, pleading
for help as she reiterated that "her district was on fire and there weren't any police there and there
40
https://twitter.com/MNNationalGuard/status/1266219821840109569
41
42
https://twitter.com/maxnesterak/status/1266213485026906113?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed
%7Ctwterm%5E1266213485026906113%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mprnews.org%2F
story%2F2020%2F05%2F28%2Fminneapolis-wakes-up-to-destruction-after-night-of-protests
43
44
https://twitter.com/CathyWurzer/status/1266312114739843074; https://www.twincities.com/2020/07/04/they-
have-lost-control-how-minneapolis-leaders-failed-to-stop-their-city-from-burning/
21
Ex. 2
weren't any firefighters. There was no social control." 45 Regular citizens' calls for help remained
unanswered.
74. Major General Jon Jensen, Adjutant General of the Minnesota National Guard,
finally had to tell Governor Walz that the Minnesota National Guard was going to protect the
firefighters until the city had the situation under control again. 46
75. It was not until 3:45 a.m. that the plan to use the National Guard was ordered in. 47
76. The Minnesota National Guard was not fully mobilized in the City of Minneapolis
until four days after the first building was burned. 48
45
46
2:12:15-2:14:46).
47
48
Gerlicher's Written Testimony; https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tim-walz-minnesota-governor-fully-mobilizes-
national-guard-first-time-in-history-george-floyd-death-protests/).
22
Ex. 2
77. However, they were too late. At 4:27 a.m., Ray tweeted "My district is in flames.
Many buildings collapsing right now. Fires going on for hours and no firefighters arrived to the
area. Stores, restaurants, post office, barbershops, salons, gone! (crying emoticon)
#Minneapolis." 49
78. Mayor Frey and the City's failure to control the significant (yet manageable)
number of malefactors on Lake Street resulted in his failure to protect Town Talk. At 4:45 a.m.,
the historic restaurant continued to burn.
H. The Aftermath – Morning of May 29, 2020
79. At 8:19 a.m. that morning, all that remained of Town Talk was its iconic sign
demolished under a pile of rubble. 50
49
https://twitter.com/TorresRayMN/status/1266300203016916993
50
https://twitter.com/ShadowFoxMT/status/1272287041569591298;
https://twitter.com/motarola123/status/1266358392148369415
23
Ex. 2
24
Ex. 2
80. The destruction to Lake Street's local businesses by fires set during the rioting
was so severe that members of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms National
Response Team were sent to Minneapolis to investigate. 51
81. "Politics, personal agendas, and personal feelings prevented police officers from
protecting the citizens of Minneapolis and the destruction of property." 52
82. The City's response was an "abject failure" as proclaimed by Governor Walz. 53
51
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, 9 (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020) (citing
https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/george-floyd/atf-national-response-team-requested-to-help-investigate-
business-fires-in-minneapolis-st-paul/89-694e445e-e812-4761-94cf-
ef00f90d0b65#:~text=Members%20of%20the%20Bureau%20of,spokesperson%20with%20the%20ATF%20St.)
52
53
https://wwww.startribune.com/gov-tim-walz-laments-abject-failure-of-riot-response/570864092/
25
Ex. 2
83. Mayor Frey and the City failed to react to the seriousness of the riots and danger
to Minnesotans and they failed to comply with policies to confront and stop the rioters. As a
result of Mayor Frey and the City's failed leadership, Kacey and Charles suffered damages in
excess of $4,500,000.00.
COUNT ONE
PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS – 42 U.S.C. § 1983
84. Kacey and Charles restate all other allegations in this complaint and incorporate
them by reference herein.
85. Kacey and Charles have constitutionally protected property rights, as defined by
Federal and Minnesota state law, to exclude others from their property and to the use and quiet
enjoyment of their property.
86. Mayor Frey and the City have infringed on those rights by: 1) negotiating with
and appeasing rioters; 2) assisting and allowing an indefinite, unpermitted obstruction of the
public streets, and sidewalks of the City, thereby denying Kacey and Charles access to their
property; and 3) assisting and allowing the pervasive vandalism and trespasses against Kacey
and Charles' property, thereby denying Kacey and Charles the ability to use their property and
exclude others from it.
87. Mayor Frey and the City have infringed on Kacey and Charles' constitutionally
protected rights without providing Kacey or Charles with any due process before depriving them
of these rights, or providing any recourse following the deprivation of rights. In particular,
Mayor Frey and the City failed to provided Kacey or Charles with notice or opportunity to be
heard before or after denying them of their rights to access their property, use their property, and
exclude others from their property.
26
Ex. 2
88. Mayor Frey and the City have done so pursuant to City policy as created, ratified,
and authorized by City policymakers, including Mayor Frey, without any notice to Kacey or
Charles or opportunity for them to be heard.
89. As a direct result of Mayor Frey and the City's actions, Kacey and Charles have
been denied regular and customary use of, access to, and enjoyment of their property, including
the ability to walk to their business without obstruction, the ability to prevent and remedy
vandalism, and the ability to prevent trespasses and theft against their property.
90. Kacey and Charles have been harmed by this deprivation, including through loss
of revenue, loss of property value, damages to property, and other damages.
91. As a result of Mayor Frey and the City's acts or omissions, Kacey and Charles
suffered losses including their building, lost restaurant revenues, loss of business, and future
income.
COUNT TWO
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS – 42 U.S.C. § 1983
93. Kacey and Charles have a right pursuant to substantive due process to be
protected from state-created dangers. "Minnesotans have a right to government protection from
these [aforementioned] criminal acts." 54
94. Mayor Frey and the City's actions, assistance, and allowance of rioters and looters
greatly increased the likelihood of property damage, loss of business revenue, personal injury,
loss of use of property, and other damages to Kacey and Charles.
54
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020).
27
Ex. 2
95. "[E]lected local leaders identified with the causes promoted by the demonstrators,
causing them to lose sight of their responsibility to protect the public from criminal acts
committed during the riots." 55
96. All damages suffered, and still to be suffered, by Kacey and Charles were and are
foreseeable.
97. Mayor Frey and the City acted with deliberate indifference to the known and
obvious harm that would be suffered by Kacey and Charles.
98. Mayor Frey and the City have done so pursuant to City policy as created and
ratified by City policymakers, including Mayor Frey.
99. "Elected officials like . . . Mayor Frey, and the Minneapolis City Council believe
that increasing the presence of law enforcement and the Minnesota National Guard causes more
rioting than ending it. Protesting is a First Amendment right; rioting is a criminal act. The First is
protected while the second needs to be stopped." 56
income.
COUNT THREE
NEGLECT TO PREVENT – 42 U.S.C. § 1986
102. Mayor Frey and the City were constitutionally required to use reasonable
diligence to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of any wrongs conspired to be done.
55
Id. at 1.
56
Id. at 27.
28
Ex. 2
103. Mayor Frey and the City neglected or refused to prevent the aforementioned
wrongful acts from being committed and thus, are liable to Kacey and Charles for all damages
caused by such wrongful acts.
104. Public safety is a core function of government, and the government failed to
protect its citizens during the 2020 riots in Minnesota. 57
105. "Mayor Frey's decision-making, combined with the Minneapolis City Council's
call to defund and dismantle the police, caused initially peaceful protests to explode into riots
that swept across the United States." 58
106. The failure of the largest city in Minnesota to fully fund its police force puts the
entire state in danger. 59
107. The "spread of violence, including the fall of the Third Precinct, could have been
avoided or at least severely curtailed had Mayor Frey given local law enforcement the authority
to use non-legal tools and resources at their disposal." 60
108. "Our highly trained Minnesota National Guard and local police officers
understood how to protect Minnesota from riots, but . . . Mayor Frey got in their way." 61
109. Mayor Frey and the City knew that there would be more looting and riots the
nights of May 27 – 29, 2020, but took no visible steps to prevent the destruction.
income.
57
Id. at 12.
58
Id. at 43.
59
Id. at 18.
60
Id. at 43.
61
Id. at 27.
29
Ex. 2
COUNT FOUR
TAKING – 42 U.S.C. § 1983
112. Kacey and Charles have constitutionally protected property rights to use and
enjoy their property and to exclude others from their property under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Minn.
Const., Art. 1, Section 13.
113. Mayor Frey and the City have deprived Kacey and Charles of those rights by
affirmatively assisting and allowing an indefinite, unpermitted invasion and obstruction of the
public rights-of-way that provide access to Kacey and Charles' private property, as well as by
affirmatively assisting and allowing the physical invasion of Kacey and Charles' private property
by rioters and looters.
115. Kacey and Charles have not received compensation of their property rights.
116. Mayor Frey and the City's actions constitute an unlawful taking for private use
and/or an unlawful taking for public use without just compensation, which has caused Kacey and
Charles economic harm, including through a loss of property value, loss of business revenue, and
loss of investment-backed expectations.
income.
30
Ex. 2
COUNT FIVE
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT – 5 U.S.C. § 552
119. Kacey and Charles have constitutionally protected right to access government
data under 5 U.S.C. § 552 and Minn. Stat. § 13.03.
120. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), an agency must respond to
requests within 20 business days. (5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)).
121. Under the Government Data Practices Act, responses to requests from a data
subject must be immediate if possible, or within ten business days. Responses to requests for
public data must be in a prompt manner and within a reasonable time. (Minn. Stat. § 13.03, subd.
2(a); Minn. Rules, part 1205.0300).
122. On or about September 22, 2020, Kacey and Charles, through counsel, submitted
a request for information from Mayor Frey and the City pursuant to the FOIA. To date, Mayor
Frey and the City have failed to respond to this request.
123. As a result of Mayor Frey and the City's acts or omissions, Kacey and Charles are
entitled to damages to be determined at trial.
JURY DEMAND
Kacey and Charles demand a trial by jury.
31
Ex. 2
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
I. Judgment in favor of Kacey and Charles and against Mayor Frey and the City for
actual damages in excess of $4,500,000.00;
II. Prejudgment interest at the maximum rate allowed by law;
III. Kacey and Charles' costs of investigation, costs of suit, and reasonable attorney’s
fees; and
IV. All such other and further monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief as the Court
may deem just and proper.
s/ Michael B. Healey ___________________

Telephone: (612) 339-1421
Facsimile: (612) 392-3999
32
Ex. 2


d/b/a Town Talk Diner & Gastropub, PLAINTIFFS' SUMMONS
Plaintiff(s),
Civil No: __________________
vs.
Mayor Jacob Frey,
Defendant(s).
THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS BY AND

THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD: GREGORY SAUTTER, OFFICE OF THE
CITY ATTORNEY, 350 S. FIFTH STREET, ROOM 210, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415.
1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiffs have started a lawsuit against you. The
Plaintiffs' Complaint against you is attached to this Summons. Do not throw these papers away.
They are official papers that affect your rights. You must respond to this lawsuit even though it
may not yet be filed with the Court and there may be no court file number on this Summons.
2. YOU MUST REPLY WITHIN 21 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS. You must
give or mail to the person who signed this summons a written response called an Answer within
21 days of the date on which you received this Summons. You must send a copy of your Answer
to the person who signed this Summons located at:
Michael Healey
Wagner, Falconer, & Judd, Ltd.
Suite 800
3. YOU MUST RESPOND TO EACH CLAIM. The Answer is your written response to
the Plaintiffs' Complaint. In your Answer you must state whether you agree or disagree with
each paragraph of the Complaint. If you believe the Plaintiffs should not be given everything
asked for in the Complaint, you must say so in your Answer.
4. YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CASE IF YOU DO NOT SEND A WRITTEN

RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT TO THE PERSON WHO SIGNED THIS
SUMMONS. If you do not answer within 21 days, you will lose this case. You will not get to
tell your side of the story, and the Court may decide against you and award the Plaintiffs
Ex. 3
everything asked for in the Complaint. If you do not want to contest the claims stated in the
Complaint, you do not need to respond. A default judgment can then be entered against you for
the relief requested in the Complaint.
5. LEGAL ASSISTANCE. You may wish to get legal help from a lawyer. If you do not
have a lawyer, the Court Administrator may have information about places where you can get
legal assistance. Even if you cannot get legal help, you must still provide a written Answer to
protect your rights or you may lose the case.
6. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties may agree to or be ordered to

participate in an alternative dispute resolution process under Rule 114 of the Minnesota General
Rules of Practice. You must still send your written response to the Complaint even if you expect
to use alternative means of resolving the dispute.
s/ Michael B. Healey_______________
Telephone: (612) 339-1421
Facsimile: (612) 392-3999
Ex. 3


d/b/a Town Talk Diner & Gastropub, PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND
Plaintiff(s), DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
vs.
Civil No: __________________
Mayor Jacob Frey,
Defendant(s).
TO: THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY OF

RECORD: GREGORY SAUTTER, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, 350 SOUTH 5TH
STREET, ROOM 210, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415
Plaintiffs hereby allege as follows:
PARTIES
1. Kacey White ("Kacey") and Charles Stotts ("Charles") (collectively "Plaintiffs")
are residents of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
2. Kacey and Charles are the owners of Town Talk Diner & Gastropub (“Town
Talk”) located at 2707 East Lake Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
3. Defendant the City of Minneapolis (“the City”) is a municipality incorporated in
the State of Minnesota and includes all city employees and/or officials who communicated with
Mayor Jacob Frey as discussed herein.
4. Defendant Jacob Frey ("Mayor Frey") is the Mayor and chief executive of the
City, and resides in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ex. 3
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. Jurisdiction is proper in Hennepin County, Minnesota because Kacey and Charles
reside in Hennepin County and the events giving rise to these claims arose in Hennepin County,
Minnesota, the Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota.
6. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1331
because this action presents federal questions and seeks to redress deprivations of rights under
the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
7. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e)(1) because the events
giving rise to these claims arose in Hennepin County, the Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
A. Background
8. On May 25, 2020, George Floyd died while in the custody of the Minneapolis
Police Department's Third Precinct officers, igniting moral outrage. A racial justice movement
deployed through the City of Minneapolis. Protests began to take place.
9. On May 26, 2020, hundreds of people surrounded the Minneapolis Police
Department's ("MPD") Third Precinct Station on the corner of Minnehaha Ave and East Lake
Street. Violence and destruction occurred in the surrounding area, creating a trail of property
damage.
10. On May 27, 2020 "the situation near Lake Street and Hiawatha in Minneapolis
[had] evolved into an extremely dangerous situation." 1 Fully aware of the serious safety issues
1
Ex. 3
they created, Mayor Frey and the City stood back and watched as their failure to follow the
policies in place destroyed the businesses on Lake Street. 2
11. Residents and business owners near the MPD's Third Precinct noticed vehicles
dropping off pallets of bricks and other objects typically used to cause property destruction.
Police were notified and questioned regarding the activity. The residents and business owners
were told to "get the f#$@ out of the area" by the police.
12. On May 28, 2020, the City officials, at the direction of and in coordination with
Mayor Frey, abruptly abandoned the MPD's Third Precinct Station and the neighborhood streets
relying on its protection. Rather than seeking to restore order and protect the residents and
property owners within the Third Precinct, the City and Mayor Frey instead chose to surrender
the area to rioters who set fire to the community.
13. Kacey, Charles, and others, repeatedly pleaded with Mayor Frey and other local
leaders to put an end to the destruction of their property and the imminent dangers that were
posed to them as their neighborhood went up in flames. But the City and Mayor Frey failed to
protect Kacey and Charles' business, forcing Kacey and Charles to resort to litigation to address
Mayor Frey and the City's unacceptable response.
14. Kacey and Charles are residents and small business owners in the Minneapolis
neighborhood that was harmed by the May 2020 riots. They have worked full time for over four
years designing, stocking, renovating, and improving Town Talk to make it one of South
Minneapolis' finest and most popular restaurants.
2
Ex. 3
15. Located in a historic building, the local neighborhood diner Town Talk has become
an iconic restaurant on Lake Street. Mayor Frey and the City’s failure to quell several nights of
rioting, fires, and ransacking of local businesses resulted in Town Talk being engulfed in flames
and burnt to the ground.
16. The MPD, National Guard, and Minneapolis Local Leaders have policies in place
to address crowd control.
17. During the days of May 25, 2020 to May 28, 2020, the City and Mayor Frey
continuously deviated from these policies.
18. Due to Mayor Frey and the City’s failure to follow proper policy, Kacey and
Charles suffered irreparable harm by being subject to acts of violence, harassment, trespass, and
vandalism, inability to use their property, loss of police protection and public services, including
police, medical, and fire services; loss of business revenue; reduction in property value;
destruction of property; and other economic and non-economic injuries.
19. On May 29, 2020, the National Guard was mobilized in the City. Following the
policies the National Guard has in place, they restored peace and order to the City.
20. On or about September 22, 2020, Kacey and Charles submitted a request for
information from Mayor Frey and the City pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices
Act. To date, Mayor Frey and the City have failed to respond to this request.
B. The Start of the Protests
21. Since the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, racial justice protests began to
fill the City.
22. Participants of the justice movements occupied the streets and sidewalks of the
City, especially in the neighborhood surrounding the Third Precinct.
Ex. 3
3
23. Peaceful protests soon developed into riots, creating a public safety concern.
3
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020).
Ex. 3
24. As history has demonstrated, the killing of an unarmed black man in police
custody sparks an emphatic societal response.
A. Trayvon Martin, killed by neighborhood watch in Florida in 2012.
B. Michael Brown, killed by a police officer in Missouri in 2014.
C. Philando Castile, killed by a police officer in Minnesota in 2016.
C. EJ Bradford, killed by a police officer in Alabama in 2018.
D. Willie McCoy, killed by a police officer in California in 2019.
25. On May 25, 2020 when indignation began, Minneapolis' local officials were
required to follow proper protocol, including the need to be on heightened alert.
26. However, executive leadership at the local level failed to distinguish between
demonstrators and rioters. Mayor Frey ultimately failed to provide the guidance Minnesotans
expect from their offices. 4
4
Id. at 1.
Ex. 3
27. Mayor Frey initially tried to negotiate with and appease the rioters rather than
give law enforcement the authority to confront criminal acts with enough force to restore law and
order. 5
28. A primary responsibility of local elected officials is to protect the public. The
inaction on the part of Mayor Frey led to an increase in violence. 6
29. Mayor Frey's failure to call for additional police presence on May 25 and 26, 2020
allowed for the "second-most destructive period of local unrest in United States history" to
ensue. 7
C. First Wave of Destruction
30. Two days later, on May 27, 2020, the protests evolved into a manageable number
of destructive crowds. Shortly after 10:30 p.m., that evening, the "situation near Lake Street and
Hiawatha [had] evolved into an extremely dangerous situation." 8
31. That evening, the first plea for everyone to leave the third precinct for the safety
of the public, and to allow firefighters and paramedics to attend to the violence and destruction
9
was made by Governor Tim Walz ("Governor Walz").
32. The second plea came from Mayor Frey around 12:30 a.m., in the early morning
10
of May 28, 2020.
5
Id.
6
Id.
7
Id. at 6.
8
9
Id.
10
Ex. 3
10
Ex. 3
33. Ignoring the pleas of the Minnesota local leaders, a significant (yet manageable)
number of malefactors took over East Lake Street. For over three hours that morning, East Lake
Street burned. 11
34. The small businesses and homes that weren’t engulfed in flames on that evening
were vandalized and destroyed.
35. The morning of May 28, 2020, Kacey and Charles arrived at Town Talk to assess
the damage after a night of violence and looting, finding the destruction to their restaurant to be
far worse than they could have imagined.
11
https://twitter.com/ryahoward/status/1265904413933293568;
https://twitter.com/ChristianeWCCO/status/1265952993196888064
11
Ex. 3
12
Ex. 3
D. Anticipating the Second Wave – Afternoon of May 28, 2020
36. Kacey and Charles looked at what was left of their historic restaurant, which had
not yet been burned but had been devastated by the amount of destruction. They then boarded up
the windows of Town Talk, hoping to prevent further damage from the riots that every
reasonable person knew would be coming that evening.
13
Ex. 3
37. The media, including WCCO, KARE 11, KSTP, and Fox 9 openly began asking
where the elected leaders were, "what's the plan?", "who is in charge?", and "what are your
resources?" However, Mayor Frey's responsive news conference was "the strangest, most rattled,
evasive, and unclear news conference," providing no answers to the citizens of the City. 12
38. Proactively responding to another anticipated evening of destruction, at 5:00 p.m.
on May 28, 2020, Saint Paul requested that the National Guard be activated for the protection of
their city. No request came at that time from the City of Minneapolis.
39. At 8:30 p.m. that evening, Governor Walz observed that the activity surrounding
Lake Street was no longer appearing to be peaceful. 13
E. The Third Precinct is Abandoned – Evening of May 28, 2020
40. A policy was in place to hold the Third Precinct without a loss of life using the
same non-lethal methods used previously in the week. 14
41. The City has a policy in place in the event of civil unrest. Mayor Frey consciously
chose to deviate from this policy.
42. Mayor Frey failed to acknowledge the seriousness of the situation and failed to
confront the lawlessness.
43. Cheryl Dorsey, a retired police sergeant commented "I do not know what kind of
intelligence they may have over there on that police department. I don't know how they could've
been caught off guard by this. But surely, someone should have realized that this situation was
very different from other incidents." 15
12
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, 16, 18 (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020) (citing 5/29/20
Tom Lunden Tweet).
13
14
Id. at 27.
15
14
Ex. 3
44. As the chaos became more intense due the lack of police, the MPD were forced to
watch the escalation as they waited on a decision to be made by Mayor Frey regarding the Third
Precinct.
45. Minneapolis City Council Member Linea Palmisano stated "You can't let the
Third Precinct go, that would just be the epitome of ultimate chaos in our city," properly pointing
out that the decision should be made consistent with the City's policy. 16
46. Mayor Frey was informed by the MPD that they could hold the precinct solely
using non-lethal methods, but Mayor Frey refused to use those non-lethal methods to protect the
Third Precinct. 17
47. Minneapolis police officers were told they were not allowed to use the tools at
their disposal because it "looks bad," and therefore were not allowed to respond to the rioting in
the way they were trained to respond. 18
48. As Mayor Frey indecisively balanced politics with tactics, ignoring the advice of
Minneapolis' top law enforcement officials, destruction to the Third Precinct quickly escalated. 19
49. Some Minneapolis police officers were informed by the Longfellow Business
Association that "the police would be abandoning the precinct and would be leaving [the citizens
of Minneapolis] to defend for ourselves in the middle of a riot." 20
16
Id.
17
Gerlicher's Written Testimony).
18
Id. at 25 (citing Hearing 4, 1:27:20-1:27-50).
19
Id. at 27.
20
15
Ex. 3
50. Due to the failure of Mayor Frey and the City to provide the resources and
personnel needed, the MPD was forced into a defensive position during the rioting with no
ability to safely respond to and stop the looting and arson. 21
51. Commander Scott Gerlicher of the MPD described the destruction and the
inability of local police to control the rioting: "The situation was dire, and we needed assistance
immediately." 22
52. An untimely directive to abandon the Third Precinct finally came from Mayor
Frey through the Chief of Police. 23 Mayor Frey made the decision to evacuate the Third Precinct,
removing police officers from the neighborhood, and leaving the citizens of Lake Street to
24
defend themselves and their property.
53. Minneapolis police officers never had a situation where the Mayor, Governor, and
the Commissioner of Public Safety were making these types of decisions rather than the local
police. 25 Despite it being the MPD's responsibility to make such decisions, Mayor Frey actively
chose to deviate from the chain of command policy in place.
54. The citizens and business owners were not consulted, given an opportunity to
comment, or provided a hearing, regarding the directive to abandon the Third Precinct and to
leave citizens and business owners to fend for themselves.
21
22
23
24
25
1:48:17-1:48:50).
16
Ex. 3
55. As the Third Precinct fell it became apparent to the Commissioner of the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety and other State Officials that local leader, Mayor Frey,
could not handle it himself. 26
56. By 10:30 p.m., the Third Precinct had been taken over by rioters. 27
26
Id. (citing Hearing 3, Part 2, 20:11-21:21).
27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvQFzWo4jlk
17
Ex. 3
F. Citizens Abandoned – Evening of May 29, 2020
57. As a result of Mayor Frey's decision to abandon the Third Precinct, one by one,
16 to 26 buildings in Sector Four of the Third Precinct caught fire as well. 28
58. Citizens were then forced to try and protect themselves and their property as it
became clear that the City and Mayor Frey were not keeping them safe. 29
59. With no firefighters in sight, Minneapolis residents, including two members of the
House of Representatives, Aisha Gomez and Hodan Hassan, struggled to put out the fires:
"@RepHassan and I spent 90 minutes trying to get a gas station fire put out. A basic City service.
When I have time and our community isn’t burning I will explain the dizzying game of
jurisdictional hot potato we experienced. This response is unacceptable." (Emphasis added). 30
28
https://www.kimt.com/content/news/30-fire-events-including-16-involving-structures-on-one-Minneapolis-street -
570832391.html; https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-news/a-list-of-the-buildings-damaged-looted-in-
minneapolis-and-st-paul
29
Id. at 18.
30
https://twitter.com/RepAishaGomez/status/1266616114257235974
18
Ex. 3
60. When business owners asked how to get police protection, the response was that
they did not know, and that citizens should try to get ahold of Mayor Frey's office or police
chief. There was never an answer from either of those offices. 31
61. Others who called 911 were told that if the situation was not "life threatening"
then the police would not get there for four days. 32
62. Some 911 calls were going completely unanswered. "The most serious types of
911 calls, which are usually responded to immediately, were unanswered for extended periods of
time because of the rioting." 33
63. The delays in response from Mayor Frey and the City, particularly for the most
serious 911 calls, allowed for more rioting, destruction, looting, and violence. 34
64. While the riots were ongoing, Mayor Frey and the Minneapolis City Council did
not call for more police officers on the street.
65. Although stationed nearby, firefighters did not enter the protest zone. 35
66. At one point during the riots, Minneapolis firefighters quit responding to arsons
and only responded to medical emergencies because even they did not feel safe without police
31
32
33
Id. at 17, 18 (citing Hearing 4, 3:23:41-3:24:24; Commander Gerlicher's Written Testimony).
34
Id. at 18.
35
https://twitter.com/maxnesterak/status/1266213485026906113?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembe
d%7Ctwterm%5E1266213485026906113%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mprnews.org%2
Fstory%2F2020%2F05%2F28%2Fminneapolis-wakes-up-to-destruction-after-night-of-protests;
19
Ex. 3
protection. 36
67. As Lake Street businesses continued to burn, local protection was nowhere to be
found. 37 As publicly expressed by Minneapolis citizens:
A. "They didn't protect our people. We were all on our own. The fire engine
was just sitting there, but they wouldn’t do anything." 38
B. "Where is the Police??? Where are the firefighters??? Where is the
National Guard!??? . . . Not much else left on E. Lake St. to set on fire other than homes! . . .
What is next? Who will protect us? What is the plan?" 39
36
1:49:02-1:50:30).
37
Id. at 18.
38
Id. at 9 (citing https://www.startribune.com/manufacturer-that-burned-during-mpls-riots-plans-to-move-out-of-
the-city/571104922/).
39
Id. at 17 (citing City of Minneapolis Data Practice Information 2, pgs. 119-120).
20
Ex. 3
68. At 11:08 p.m. on May 29, 2020, in response to concerned citizens, the National
Guard tweeted that they were in Minneapolis and ready to assist the Minneapolis Fire
Department. However, the National Guard was still not activated. 40
69. At 11:30 p.m., Mayor Frey told the citizens of Minneapolis "for our Minneapolis
firefighters to respond, the area of the fire must be secure so they can focus on fighting the fire
without risking their own safety." 41 However, Mayor Frey did not bring in the National Guard or
MPD into the area to secure it.
70. After over an hour of Lake Street burning, there were still no police officers or
National Guard in sight. 42
71. Sara Sidner, a CNN National Correspondent commented "I have never seen a
situation like this. I've never seen a situation where a precinct, a police department precinct, is on
fire, and there is absolutely no authority out there to try and control the situation." 43
G. Minnesota National Guard is Mobilized
72. After five (5) hours of roaring flames destroying Lake Street, at 3:30 a.m. Town
Talk was set ablaze. Not a single public official, police officer, firefighter or member of the
Minnesota National Guard was around. 44
73. State Senator Patricia Torres Ray ("Ray") called Governor Walz directly, pleading
for help as she reiterated that "her district was on fire and there weren't any police there and there
40
https://twitter.com/MNNationalGuard/status/1266219821840109569
41
42
https://twitter.com/maxnesterak/status/1266213485026906113?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed
%7Ctwterm%5E1266213485026906113%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mprnews.org%2F
story%2F2020%2F05%2F28%2Fminneapolis-wakes-up-to-destruction-after-night-of-protests
43
44
https://twitter.com/CathyWurzer/status/1266312114739843074; https://www.twincities.com/2020/07/04/they-
have-lost-control-how-minneapolis-leaders-failed-to-stop-their-city-from-burning/
21
Ex. 3
weren't any firefighters. There was no social control." 45 Regular citizens' calls for help remained
unanswered.
74. Major General Jon Jensen, Adjutant General of the Minnesota National Guard,
finally had to tell Governor Walz that the Minnesota National Guard was going to protect the
firefighters until the city had the situation under control again. 46
75. It was not until 3:45 a.m. that the plan to use the National Guard was ordered in. 47
76. The Minnesota National Guard was not fully mobilized in the City of Minneapolis
until four days after the first building was burned. 48
45
46
2:12:15-2:14:46).
47
48
Gerlicher's Written Testimony; https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tim-walz-minnesota-governor-fully-mobilizes-
national-guard-first-time-in-history-george-floyd-death-protests/).
22
Ex. 3
77. However, they were too late. At 4:27 a.m., Ray tweeted "My district is in flames.
Many buildings collapsing right now. Fires going on for hours and no firefighters arrived to the
area. Stores, restaurants, post office, barbershops, salons, gone! (crying emoticon)
#Minneapolis." 49
78. Mayor Frey and the City's failure to control the significant (yet manageable)
number of malefactors on Lake Street resulted in his failure to protect Town Talk. At 4:45 a.m.,
the historic restaurant continued to burn.
H. The Aftermath – Morning of May 29, 2020
79. At 8:19 a.m. that morning, all that remained of Town Talk was its iconic sign
demolished under a pile of rubble. 50
49
https://twitter.com/TorresRayMN/status/1266300203016916993
50
https://twitter.com/ShadowFoxMT/status/1272287041569591298;
https://twitter.com/motarola123/status/1266358392148369415
23
Ex. 3
24
Ex. 3
80. The destruction to Lake Street's local businesses by fires set during the rioting
was so severe that members of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms National
Response Team were sent to Minneapolis to investigate. 51
81. "Politics, personal agendas, and personal feelings prevented police officers from
protecting the citizens of Minneapolis and the destruction of property." 52
82. The City's response was an "abject failure" as proclaimed by Governor Walz. 53
51
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, 9 (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020) (citing
https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/george-floyd/atf-national-response-team-requested-to-help-investigate-
business-fires-in-minneapolis-st-paul/89-694e445e-e812-4761-94cf-
ef00f90d0b65#:~text=Members%20of%20the%20Bureau%20of,spokesperson%20with%20the%20ATF%20St.)
52
53
https://wwww.startribune.com/gov-tim-walz-laments-abject-failure-of-riot-response/570864092/
25
Ex. 3
83. Mayor Frey and the City failed to react to the seriousness of the riots and danger
to Minnesotans and they failed to comply with policies to confront and stop the rioters. As a
result of Mayor Frey and the City's failed leadership, Kacey and Charles suffered damages in
excess of $4,500,000.00.
COUNT ONE
PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS – 42 U.S.C. § 1983
85. Kacey and Charles have constitutionally protected property rights, as defined by
Federal and Minnesota state law, to exclude others from their property and to the use and quiet
enjoyment of their property.
86. Mayor Frey and the City have infringed on those rights by: 1) negotiating with
and appeasing rioters; 2) assisting and allowing an indefinite, unpermitted obstruction of the
public streets, and sidewalks of the City, thereby denying Kacey and Charles access to their
property; and 3) assisting and allowing the pervasive vandalism and trespasses against Kacey
and Charles' property, thereby denying Kacey and Charles the ability to use their property and
exclude others from it.
87. Mayor Frey and the City have infringed on Kacey and Charles' constitutionally
protected rights without providing Kacey or Charles with any due process before depriving them
of these rights, or providing any recourse following the deprivation of rights. In particular,
Mayor Frey and the City failed to provided Kacey or Charles with notice or opportunity to be
heard before or after denying them of their rights to access their property, use their property, and
exclude others from their property.
26
Ex. 3
88. Mayor Frey and the City have done so pursuant to City policy as created, ratified,
and authorized by City policymakers, including Mayor Frey, without any notice to Kacey or
Charles or opportunity for them to be heard.
89. As a direct result of Mayor Frey and the City's actions, Kacey and Charles have
been denied regular and customary use of, access to, and enjoyment of their property, including
the ability to walk to their business without obstruction, the ability to prevent and remedy
vandalism, and the ability to prevent trespasses and theft against their property.
90. Kacey and Charles have been harmed by this deprivation, including through loss
of revenue, loss of property value, damages to property, and other damages.
income.
COUNT TWO
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS – 42 U.S.C. § 1983
93. Kacey and Charles have a right pursuant to substantive due process to be
protected from state-created dangers. "Minnesotans have a right to government protection from
these [aforementioned] criminal acts." 54
94. Mayor Frey and the City's actions, assistance, and allowance of rioters and looters
greatly increased the likelihood of property damage, loss of business revenue, personal injury,
loss of use of property, and other damages to Kacey and Charles.
54
Lawlessness & Government Responses to Minnesota's 2020 Riots, (St. S. Rep. Oct. 2020).
27
Ex. 3
95. "[E]lected local leaders identified with the causes promoted by the demonstrators,
causing them to lose sight of their responsibility to protect the public from criminal acts
committed during the riots." 55
96. All damages suffered, and still to be suffered, by Kacey and Charles were and are
foreseeable.
97. Mayor Frey and the City acted with deliberate indifference to the known and
obvious harm that would be suffered by Kacey and Charles.
99. "Elected officials like . . . Mayor Frey, and the Minneapolis City Council believe
that increasing the presence of law enforcement and the Minnesota National Guard causes more
rioting than ending it. Protesting is a First Amendment right; rioting is a criminal act. The First is
protected while the second needs to be stopped." 56
income.
55
Id. at 1.
56
Id. at 27.
28
Ex. 3
COUNT THREE
NEGLECT TO PREVENT – 42 U.S.C. § 1986
102. Mayor Frey and other City officials were constitutionally required to use
reasonable diligence to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of any wrongs conspired to
be done.
103. Mayor Frey and other City officials, at Mayor Frey’s direction and in
coordination with Mayor Frey, neglected or refused to prevent the aforementioned wrongful acts
from being committed and thus, are liable to Kacey and Charles for all damages caused by such
wrongful acts.
104. Public safety is a core function of government, and the government failed to
protect its citizens during the 2020 riots in Minnesota. 57
105. "Mayor Frey's decision-making, combined with the Minneapolis City Council's
call to defund and dismantle the police, caused initially peaceful protests to explode into riots
that swept across the United States." 58
106. The failure of the largest city in Minnesota to fully fund its police force puts the
entire state in danger. 59
107. The "spread of violence, including the fall of the Third Precinct, could have been
avoided or at least severely curtailed had Mayor Frey given local law enforcement the authority
to use non-legal tools and resources at their disposal." 60
57
Id. at 12.
58
Id. at 43.
59
Id. at 18.
60
Id. at 43.
29
Ex. 3
108. "Our highly trained Minnesota National Guard and local police officers
understood how to protect Minnesota from riots, but . . . Mayor Frey got in their way." 61
109. Mayor Frey and other City officials knew that there would be more looting and
riots the nights of May 27 – 29, 2020, but took no visible steps to prevent the destruction.
110. As a result of Mayor Frey's acts or omissions, in coordination with the acts or
omissions of other City officials, Kacey and Charles suffered losses including their building, lost
restaurant revenues, loss of business, and future income.
COUNT FOUR
TAKING – 42 U.S.C. § 1983
112. Kacey and Charles have constitutionally protected property rights to use and
enjoy their property and to exclude others from their property under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Minn.
Const., Art. 1, Section 13.
113. Mayor Frey and the City have deprived Kacey and Charles of those rights by
affirmatively assisting and allowing an indefinite, unpermitted invasion and obstruction of the
public rights-of-way that provide access to Kacey and Charles' private property, as well as by
affirmatively assisting and allowing the physical invasion of Kacey and Charles' private property
by rioters and looters.
115. Kacey and Charles have not received compensation of their property rights.
61
Id. at 27.
30
Ex. 3
116. Mayor Frey and the City's actions constitute an unlawful taking for private use
and/or an unlawful taking for public use without just compensation, which has caused Kacey and
Charles economic harm, including through a loss of property value, loss of business revenue, and
loss of investment-backed expectations.
income.
COUNT FIVE
MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT
119. Kacey and Charles have statutorily protected right to access government data
under Minn. Stat. § 13.03.
120. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act ("MGDPA"), responses to
requests from a data subject must be immediate if possible, or within ten business days.
Responses to requests for public data must be in a prompt manner and within a reasonable time.
(Minn. Stat. § 13.03, subd. 2(a); Minn. Rules, part 1205.0300).
121. On or about September 22, 2020, Kacey and Charles, through counsel, submitted
a request for information from Mayor Frey and the City pursuant to the MGDPA. To date,
Mayor Frey and the City have failed to respond to this request.
122. As a result of Mayor Frey and the City's acts or omissions, Kacey and Charles are
entitled to damages to be determined at trial.
31
Ex. 3
JURY DEMAND
Kacey and Charles demand a trial by jury.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
I. Judgment in favor of Kacey and Charles and against Mayor Frey and the City for
actual damages in excess of $4,500,000.00;
II. Prejudgment interest at the maximum rate allowed by law;
III. Kacey and Charles' costs of investigation, costs of suit, and reasonable attorney’s
fees; and
IV. All such other and further monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief as the Court
may deem just and proper.
s/ Michael B. Healey ___________________

Telephone: (612) 339-1421
Facsimile: (612) 392-3999
32
Ex. 3
Kacey White (individually), Charles Case Type:

Stotts (individually), and d/b/a Town
Talk Diner & Gastropub, Court File No.:
Plaintiffs,
NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF
v. ACTION TO UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
City of Minneapolis, Mayor Jacob Frey,
Defendants.
TO: Plaintiffs above-named and their attorneys, Michael Healey, Nathan

Serr and Cassandra Kuebler, Wagner Falconer & Judd, Ltd., 100 South
Fifth Street, Suite 800, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Defendants City of Minneapolis and Mayor Jacob Frey (“removing
Defendants”) hereby give notice of the removal of this lawsuit to the United
States District Court by electronic mail, and mailing a copy of this notice through
United States mail, to Plaintiffs Kacey White and Charles Stotts, through their
attorneys of record, Michael Healey, Nathan Serr and Cassandra Kuebler
electronically filing the same with the Hennepin County District Court.
Dated: February 8, 2021 JAMES R. ROWADER, JR.

City Attorney
By
/s/ Heather P. Robertson

HEATHER P. ROBERTSON (#0390470)
KRISTIN R. SARFF (#0388003)
SHARDA ENSLIN (#0389370)
Assistant City Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
City Hall, Room 210
(612) 673-3949
2
JS 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEET
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
City of Minneapolis, Mayor Jacob Frey
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Hennepin County of Residence of First Listed Defendant Hennepin
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
Michael Healey, Nathan Serr, Cassandra Kuebler Heather P. Robertson, Kristin R. Sarff, Sharda Enslin
Wagner Falconer & Judd, Ltd. Minneapolis City Attorney's Office
100 South Fifth Street, Suite 800 Room 210, City Hall
Minneapolis, MN 55402 350 South Fifth Street
(612) 339-1421 Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 673-3949
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4
of Business In This State
2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6 6
Foreign Country
IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act
120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 400 State Reapportionment
130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability 690 Other 28 USC 157 410 Antitrust
140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 430 Banks and Banking
150 Recovery of Overpayment 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 450 Commerce
& Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights 460 Deportation
151 Medicare Act 330 Federal Employers’ Product Liability 830 Patent 470 Racketeer Influenced and
152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations
Student Loans 340 Marine Injury Product 480 Consumer Credit
(Excludes Veterans) 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY 490 Cable/Sat TV
153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 710 Fair Labor Standards 861 HIA (1395ff) 850 Securities/Commodities/
of Veteran’s Benefits 350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud Act 862 Black Lung (923) Exchange
160 Stockholders’ Suits 355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending 720 Labor/Management 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 890 Other Statutory Actions
190 Other Contract Product Liability 380 Other Personal Relations 864 SSID Title XVI 891 Agricultural Acts
195 Contract Product Liability 360 Other Personal Property Damage 740 Railway Labor Act 865 RSI (405(g)) 893 Environmental Matters
196 Franchise Injury 385 Property Damage 751 Family and Medical 895 Freedom of Information
362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act Act
Medical Malpractice 790 Other Labor Litigation 896 Arbitration
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS 899 Administrative Procedure
210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff Act/Review or Appeal of
220 Foreclosure 441 Voting 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) Agency Decision
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment 510 Motions to Vacate 871 IRS—Third Party 950 Constitutionality of
240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 State Statutes
245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 530 General
290 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/Disabilities 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION
Employment Other: 462 Naturalization Application
446 Amer. w/Disabilities 540 Mandamus & Other 465 Other Immigration
Other 550 Civil Rights Actions
448 Education 555 Prison Condition
560 Civil Detainee -
Conditions of
Confinement
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
1 Original 2 Removed from 3 Remanded from 4 Reinstated or 5 Transferred from 6 Multidistrict
Proceeding State Court Appellate Court Reopened Another District Litigation
(specify)
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
VI. CAUSE OF Removal is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1441 (a) and (b), 1343, 1331, and 1367(a).
ACTION Brief description of cause:
Plaintiffs claims violation of their onstitutional Rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 42 U.S.C § 1986.
VII. REQUESTED IN CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:
COMPLAINT: UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. JURY DEMAND: Yes No
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)

(See instructions):
IF ANY JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
02/08/2021 /s/Heather P. Robertson
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT # s AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44

Authority For Civil Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I. (a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at
the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In
land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment,
noting in this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark
this section for each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is
sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more
than one nature of suit, select the most definitive.
V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes.

Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.
Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441.
When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.
Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing
date.
Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.
Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or
multidistrict litigation transfers.
Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407.
When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.

Show Multidocs

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Show Multidocs

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Show Multidocs

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CASE 0:21-cv-00371-WMW-KMM Doc.

1 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Kacey White (individually), Charles Stotts

Plaintiffs, NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF

City of Minneapolis, Mayor Jacob Frey,

TO: Plaintiffs above-named and their attorneys, Michael Healey, Nathan

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 1441 and 1446, Defendants,

through their attorneys, Heather P. Robertson, Kristin R. Sarff, and Sharda

and this Court as follows:

1. The City of Minneapolis and Mayor Jacob Frey (collectively

Judicial District of the State of Minnesota entitled Kacey White (individually),

Summons and Complaint were received by counsel for Defendants on January 7,

2021. An Amended Complaint was received on February 8, 2021. Counsel for

Defendants waived formal service of process. No other pleadings have been

served. No pleadings have been filed in Hennepin County District Court. No

further proceedings have occurred in this matter.

2. This Notice of Removal is filed within 30 days of Defendant’s receipt

of the complaint and is therefore timely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1).

3. A copy of the Summons is attached as Exhibit 1. A copy of the

Complaint is attached as Exhibit 2. A copy of the Amended Complaint is

4. This Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court is filed pursuant

5. The Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’

6. The Amended Complaint also asserts pendent common law claims

state claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).

7. Defendants file herewith copies of all process, pleadings and orders

Fourth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.

Dated: February 8, 2021 JAMES R. ROWADER, JR.

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

Kacey White (individually),

THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS BY AND

4. YOU WILL LOSE YOUR CASE IF YOU DO NOT SEND A WRITTEN

6. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties may agree to or be ordered to

Dated: 01/07/21 WAGNER, FALCONER, & JUDD, LTD.

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

Kacey White (individually),

vs. Civil No: __________________

TO: THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEY OF

Plaintiffs hereby allege as follows:

1. Kacey White ("Kacey") and Charles Stotts ("Charles") (collectively "Plaintiffs")

are residents of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Talk”) located at 2707 East Lake Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

3. Defendant the City of Minneapolis (“the City”) is a municipality incorporated in

the State of Minnesota.

City, and resides in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

5. Jurisdiction is proper in Hennepin County, Minnesota because Kacey and Charles

Minnesota, the Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota.

the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

deployed through the City of Minneapolis. Protests began to take place.

9. On May 26, 2020, hundreds of people surrounded the Minneapolis Police

policies in place destroyed the businesses on Lake Street. 2

Mayor Frey and the City's unacceptable response.

Minneapolis' finest and most popular restaurants.

and burnt to the ground.

to address crowd control.

continuously deviated from these policies.

destruction of property; and other economic and non-economic injuries.

B. The Start of the Protests