Aquaponic Kenya

International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology ISSN: 2313-3759 Vol. 2 No.
11; November 2015
Challenges and Opportunities to Sustainability in Aquaponic and

Hydroponics Systems
Ezekiel Okemwa 1
1 Technical University of Mombasa (TUM),

Faculty of Applied Science,
Department of Environment & Health Sciences
Tom Mboya Avenue
P.O. Box 90420-80100,
Mombasa, Kenya
1 National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI),
P. O. Box Number 30623-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Research was supported by: TUM and NACOSTI
54
International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology ISSN: 2313-3759 Vol. 2 No. 11; November 2015
Abstract
This review focuses on challenges and opportunities to sustainability in aquaponic and hydroponics systems.
Aquaponics combines hydroponic production of plants and aquaculture production of fish into a sustainable
agriculture system that uses natural biological cycles to supply nitrogen and minimizes the use of non-
renewable resources, thus providing economic benefits that can increase over time. Critical management
requirements (water quality maintenance and biofilter nitrification) for aquaculture need to be integrated with
hydroponics to successfully manage intensive aquaponic systems. These systems will be discussed with
emphasis on improving sustainability through management and integration of the living components plants,
bacteria and biofilter system. Challenges to sustainability center around balancing aquaponic system
environment for optimum growth of three organisms, maximizing production outputs and minimizing effluent
discharges to environment. Opportunities to sustainable include biological nitrogen production rates. The
potential to fill the gap between research and implementation of commercial aquaponic systems have been
identified.
Keywords: aquaponics; hydroponics; phosphorus; nutrient; pH; urban farming; water scarcity.
1. Introduction
Aquaponics is an integrated system that links hydroponic production with recirculating aquaculture. The
advantages of linking crop production and the culture of fish are shared startup, operating, and infrastructure
costs; recirculating tank waste nutrient and water removal by plants, thus reducing water usage and waste
discharge to the environment; and increased profit potential by simultaneously producing two cash crops
(Timmons et al., 2002). Properly designed and well-managed hydroponic and aquaculture systems may be
considered environmentally responsible alternatives to field-grown vegetable production and wild-caught
fisheries (Timmons et al., 2002). When these systems are combined, aquaponics closely fits the definition of
sustainable agriculture because it combines the production of plants and animals, integrates nutrient flow by
natural biological cycles (nitrification), and makes the most efficient use of nonrenewable resources.
The role of Aquaponic and Hydroponics Systems for food security would be particularly relevant because the
global population now exceeds 7.2 billion and is growing rapidly. It is expected to reach 9.6 billion around
2050 with more than 75% living in urban areas (UN, 2014). Urban population growth will require an
increasing demand for animal protein. However, the future of conventional farming, including intensive
animal protein production, in meeting this demand is challenged by rising but fluctuating energy and oil costs,
climate change and pollution. Resource limitations including the decrease of arable surfaces, constrained
(Klinger, et al.,2012), freshwater supplies, soil degradation and soil nutrient depletion also add to these
challenges (Klinger, et al.,2012). This alerts researchers to the necessity to compensate existing sustainability
deficits in agricultural food systems. The interlinking of aquacultural and hydroponic procedures allows some
of the shortcomings of the respective systems to be addressed, and this represents a promising sustainable food
production method. Aquaponic and Hydroponics can be considered a sustainable agricultural production
system regarding the definition of Lehman et al. 1993, who define sustainable agriculture as a process that
does not deplete any non-renewable resources that are essential to agriculture in order to sustain the
agricultural practices. Francis et al. 2003, add that sustainable agricultural production can be achieved by
resembling natural ecosystems and “designing systems that close nutrient cycles”, which is one of the main
55
characteristics of aquaponics. Mineral transfers from aquaculture to hydroponics support efficient nutrient
recycling, while water recirculation reduces the water use. High yield hydroponic systems require a
considerable amount of macro- and micronutrients from industrial and mining origin, leading to high energy
(i.e., for production and transport) and finite resources use (e.g., phosphorus and oil). The regular exchange of
water performed in conventional aquacultural systems is not necessary in aquaponics. In this respect, 1 kg of
beef meat requires between 5,000 and 20,000 L of water and the same amount of fish bred in semi- and
extensive conventional aquaculture systems requires a range of 2,500–375,000 L. Recirculating aquaculture
systems, on the other hand, have a high degree of water reuse (i.e., 95%–99%), with water usage down to
below 100 L kg−1 of fish produced. In aquaponics, nitrate in excess is used for valuable plant production
instead of being removed in gaseous form in denitrification units Van Rijn, 2013. Although preliminary
research has shown that developed aquaponic system components are not yet fully realized in view of either
cost effectiveness or technical capabilities, the aquaponics concept is promising to contribute to both global
and urban sustainable food production and should at the same time diminish pollution and need for resources.
In order to meet the goal of establishing large-scale eco-efficient and economically viable aquaponic farming
projects, this paper reviews the technical and socio-ecological developments that have been undertaken to date
and demonstrates which aspects still need to be addressed. The purpose of this paper is to highlight current
challenges and opportunities to Sustainability in Aquaponic and Hydroponics Systems and give directions for
further research. Various approaches are described for each challenge.
2. Principles of Aquaponics
Aquaponics combines hydroponics and recirculating aquaculture elements. Conventional hydroponics requires
mineral fertilizers in order to supply the plants with necessary nutrients but the aquaponics systems use the
available fish water that is rich in fish waste as nutrients for plant growth. Another advantage of this
combination lies in the fact that excess of nutrients does not need to be removed through periodical exchange
of enriched fish water with fresh water as practiced in aquaculture systems. The system results in a symbiosis
between fish, microorganisms and plants, and encourages sustainable use of water and nutrients, including
their recycling. Within this synergistic interaction, the respective ecological weaknesses of aquaculture and
hydroponics are converted into strengths. This combination substantially minimizes the need for input of
nutrients and output of waste, unlike when run as separate systems. Plants need macronutrients (e.g., C, H, O,
N, P, K, Ca, S and Mg) and micronutrients (e.g., Fe, Cl, Mn, B, Zn, Cu and Mo), which are essential for their
growth. Hydroponic solutions contain well-defined proportions of these elements [23] and are added to the
hydroponic solution in ionic form with the exception of C, H, and O, which are available from air and water.
In aquaponics systems, plant nutrient input from the fish tanks contains dissolved nutrient rich fish waste,
comprising of both soluble and solid organic compounds that are solubilized to ionic form in the water and
assimilated by the plants. To sustain adequate plant growth the concentrations of micro- and macronutrients
need to be monitored. Periodically some nutrients may need to be added to adjust their concentration, for
example iron is often deficient in fish waste Damon, et al.,1998. Aquaponic systems need to be able to host
different microorganism communities that are involved in fish waste processing and solubilization. Ammonia
(NH4+) from fish urine and gill excretion can build up to toxic levels if not removed from the system. This
can be done by step-wise microbial conversion to nitrate. One of the most important microbial components is
the nitrifying autotrophic bacteria consortium that is established as a biofilm on solid surfaces within the
system and is principally composed of nitroso-bacteria (e.g., Nitrosomonas sp.) and nitro-bacteria (e.g.,
Nitrospira sp., Nitrobacter sp.). The ammonia within the system is converted into nitrite (NO2−) by nitroso-
bacteria, before being transformed into nitrate (NO3−) by the nitro-bacteria [26]. The final product of this
bacterial conversion, nitrate, is considerably less toxic for fish and due to its bioconversion, is the main
56
nitrogen source for plant growth in aquaponics systems Rakocy, et al.,2006. In most systems, a special
biofiltration unit where intensive nitrification occurs is required.
The optimal ratio between fish and plants needs to be identified to get the right balance between fish nutrient
production and plant uptake in each system. Rakocy, et al.,2006. reports that this could be based on the
feeding rate ratio, which is the amount of feed per day per square meter of plant varieties. On this basis, a
value between 60 and 100 g day−1 m−2 has been recommended for leafy-greens growing on raft hydroponic
systems. Endut et al. 2010, found an optimum ratio of 15–42 grams of fish feed day−1 m−2 of plant growing
with one African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) for eight water spinach plants (Ipomoea aquatica). Hence,
finding the right balance necessitates fundamental knowledge and experiences with regard to the following
criteria: (1) types of fish and their food use rate; (2) composition of the fish food, for example, the quantity of
pure proteins converted to Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN); (3) frequency of feeding; (4) hydroponic system
type and design; (5) types and physiological stages of cultivated plants (leafy greens vs. fruity vegetables); (6)
plant sowing density, and (7) chemical composition of the water influenced by the mineralization rate of fish
waste. Additionally, since fish, microorganisms and plants are in the same water loop, environmental
parameters such as temperature, pH and mineral concentrations need to be set at a compromise point as close
as possible to their respective optimal growth conditions.
3. System Description
The aquaponics system can be seen as the connection between a conventional recirculating aquaculture
systems (RAS) and hydroponics components. In short, water recirculates in a loop as it flows from the fish
tank to filtration units, before it is pumped into the hydroponic beds that are used as water reprocessing units.
The filtration units are composed of mechanical filtration units for solid particles removal (e.g., drum filter or
settling tank), and biofilters for nitrification processes (e.g., trickling or moving bed biofilter).
Three types of hydroponic beds are commonly used: media-based grow bed, Deep Water Culture (DWC) bed,
and Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) gutter shaped bed. The media-based grow bed is a hydroponic trough
filled with inert substrate (e.g., expanded clay, perlite, pumice, gravel), serving as root support and microbial
substrate. The water is commonly supplied in an ebb and flow pattern, ensuring sequential nutrition and
aeration. The DWC system consists of large troughs with perforated floating rafts, where net plant pots are
inserted. In the DWC system, these plant pots are generally filled with media, such as rockwool, coco or
pumice that support the roots, which are then continually submerged in the water tank. The Nutrient Film
Technique (NFT) consists of narrow channels of perforated squared pipes where the roots are partially
immersed in a thin layer of streaming water.
DWC systems are mainly used, and important design parameters such as fish to plant ratio or daily feed input
are sometimes missing from the literature. It must be mentioned that some costs (i.e., labor costs) are not taken
into account, so the financial viability can only be partially estimated. Apart from the UVI system, there is a
lack of scientific literature when it comes to aquaponic experiments on large scale and during long time
sequences. Moreover, many experimental setups published are small-scale replicates of the UVI design.
Limited data on cost and potential profit of such systems are available. As aquaponics is still in a maturing
experimental phase, scientific research has focused more on technical aspects than economic viability.
However, economic challenges need to be addressed.
57
4. Challenges Faced by the Hydroponics Industry Worldwide
Identifying the challenges faced by the hydroponics industry worldwide is like forecasting the future and
requires some ‘strategic thinking’. In the business world, strategic thinking is a process whereby you learn
how to make your business vision a reality by developing your abilities in team work, problem solving, and
critical thinking. It is a tool used to help you confront change, plan for and make transitions, and envision new
possibilities and opportunities.
The sustainable development of the planet and the way we feed and clothe the population are major issues
confronting the world today. As a global community, we need to advance our expertise in plant production,
food technology, sustainable management of natural resources, as well as how we use the natural environment
for recreational activities.
Agriculture and horticulture specialists will face some of the greatest challenges in the 21st century. They will
need to assist in the supply of food and fibre products for a growing population that is expected to number 8.9
billion people by 2050 (USAID, 2004). The main challenge will be to supply safe products that are needed for
a quality of life while maintaining a healthy planet.
Hydroponic and greenhouse technology, aquaculture and aquaponics, organic and urban farming technologies
are intensive plant production systems that are all well placed to meet the challenges ahead. However, the
growing systems of tomorrow will be vastly different to those used today. The present day systems, while a
step in the right direction, are unsustainable and in the future it will be necessary to develop alternative
production systems that are more efficient in terms of water, energy and labour use. Driving the challenges
ahead are consumer and government pressures to produce safe, nutritious food in a way that is sustainable and
does not harm the environment.
The new global economy and the advent of free trade agreements pose significant challenges for the
hydroponics industry worldwide. Cheap products flooding international markets take away livelihoods,
threaten the stability of existing fresh food markets, and increase the risk of exotic new pests and diseases
establishing in countries where they previously didn’t exist, with serious impacts on important commercial
crops and natural ecosystems.
The world is littered with accidental and inadvertent pest and disease introductions owing to bad grower
practices, dubious Import Risk Assessments, inadequate management protocols and quarantine inspection
failures. For example, the recent arrival of potato spindle virus in Western European Union had the potential
to cripple the European Union greenhouse industry had it found its way into the green waste.
Fortunately, it was discovered early and eradicated. Other countries have not been so lucky. Pepino Mosaic
Virus (PepMV), which was detected in greenhouse tomatoes in Europe a decade ago, has now appeared in
North American greenhouse tomatoes. Other tomato diseases galloping across the globe that threaten
commercial greenhouse industries include Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV), which has jumped from
Cuba to Florida, and now Morocco, and Tomato Infectious Chlorosis Virus (TICV), which was discovered in
tomatoes in California, and has now turned up in Italy.
In the early 1990’s, western flower thrips found its way into European Union and is now widespread and
creating havoc, while more recently lettuce aphid originating from northern Europe, has found its way to New
58
Zealand and brought that country’s lettuce industry to its knees. The lettuce aphid has since made its way to
Tasmania, and was recently detected on the mainland, threatening European Union ’s lettuce industry.
Quarantine issues will be major obstacles for free trade agreements in fresh food commodities between
countries such as European Union and New Zealand that have strict import and food safety regulations. There
will be increasing pressure on exporting countries for growers to meet the same exacting standards as
European Union and New Zealand growers to ensure the food chain remains ‘clean and green’.
With the rising power of supermarket chains in developing countries replacing the traditional markets for fresh
fruit and vegetables, demands are increasing for ‘clean and green’ produce. Consumers demand to know what
pesticides and other chemicals have been used to produce their food. In the future, crops will need to be grown
without the use of pesticides and fungicides.
Scientists and educators worldwide have responded to this challenge by developing alternative ways of
managing pests and diseases in agricultural and horticultural products, such as Integrated Pest Management
(IPM) and gene technology, also known as biotechnology.
A major challenge ahead for industry will be to grow crops with a minimal use of safe pesticides. This means
developing more disease-resistant plant varieties, discovering a wider range of beneficial insects and other
biological control agents, and developing management protocols to control pest and disease problems. Most
countries still have a long way to go, including European Union . For example, while there are greater than 30
biological control agents routinely used against about 20 key pests by commercial greenhouse growers in
Europe and North America, European Union has less than 10 against the same number of major pests. Strict
import regulations means that European Union biocontrol researchers need to identify beneficial insects from
within their own environment, and to rear them in commercial quantities at an economical price, a process that
can take a decade or more once a prospective beneficial insect has been discovered as the industry can best be
described as fledgling. European Union is making progress with the recent discovery of two native thrips
predators, which are currently being commercialised for the European Union hydroponic and greenhouse
industry. These beneficial insects may also have benefits for other horticultural sectors, especially where
western flower thrips is a problem.
Biotechnology will play an important role in developing disease-resistant plant varieties. Gene technology is
also being increasingly used to develop fresh food products high in beneficial nutrients that slow or prevent
disease. For example, tomatoes are rich in lycopene, which is known to slow aging, prevent heart disease and
reduce the risk of prostate cancer. Specialised tomatoes high in lycopene are now available in North America
supermarkets. Biotechnology will be used to develop other food crops loaded with beneficial nutrients that
promote good human health.
Although recent surveys show consumer sentiment against GM foods is moderating, the debate for and against
genetically modified plants is still emotive. Genetically modified foods both attract and terrify us, but the
reality is we have been genetically modifying food since two weed species were brought together to produce
wheat. The Dutch currently use GM technologies to check the make-up of genes, which lets them advance
their breeding selections that would otherwise take many years. GM technology makes plant breeding easier
and quicker.
59
In the 21st century, biotechnology will play an increasing role to produce what is known as ‘functional’ foods.
Genetically modified foods may also carry other useful components such as genes to vaccinate consumers
against important diseases.
The quantity and quality of water available for farming and, for that matter, urban populations throughout the
world, is an important issue. In European Union , water is a scarce resource – the continent is one of the driest
in the world. Management of our water resources is paramount to the success of agricultural and horticultural
enterprises. European Union can play an important part in determining the most efficient ways of using this
resource. Issues such as salinity and water reuse are being confronted, and cooperation from users to policy-
makers is being sought.
Hydroponic and greenhouse production systems are water-efficient. Comparative analyses of water
consumption show that it takes 160,000 litres of water to produce U$100 of cotton, compared to 600 litres
(best practice) of water to produce U$100 worth of hydroponically grown produce.
There is also a significant reduction in fertiliser wastage. Using closed systems that recycle more than 95% of
the water used, the hydroponics and greenhouse industry has a recognised track record for low water use
compared to other agricultural and horticultural sectors. Unfortunately, less than one-third of hydroponic
production systems worldwide are closed with most growers still running to waste to minimise disease
problems. The challenge for these growers is to modify their systems to recycling technology, and to adopt
better practices to manage their crops. Of course, this will also increase the cost of capitalisation, but
consumers have shown they are willing to pay a higher price for high quality, safe products.
The export of fresh fruits and vegetables throughout the world is increasing. The concern in European Union
is that cheap imports don’t meet the same rigorous standards that European Union growers are required to
meet. There is clear evidence some imported produce coming in has traces of dieldrin, DDT and cancer-
causing organochlorides. There is also a concern about untreated organic waste such as night soil and pig
waste being used as fertilisers on vegetables grown in countries such as China for export to European Union .
Industries and governments worldwide are highly concerned about food safety and the harmonisation of
agricultural production systems with the environment, and production of future food in enclosed hydroponic
production systems seems to offer many advantages. However, recognition and support by governments, or
should I say the lack of recognition and support by governments, is a major impediment to the industry’s
growth in many developed and developing countries.
Strategic thinking tells us we must look to the Netherlands as the best industry model in order to identify the
challenges ahead for hydroponics worldwide. Holland has the most developed hydroponic and greenhouse
industry in the world. However, the changing market environment has brought with it many challenges. Until
10 years ago, Dutch growers and their grower organisations under-estimated the dynamic power of the
Spanish vegetable industry when it joined the European Community (EC). From 1992 to 1999, Spanish
vegetable exports jumped 10% or more per annum. At the same time, the market was changing from a
producer-orientated market, where the produce was presented by the producer, to a demand-orientated market
in response to the rising power of supermarkets.
60
There are many similarities between Spain and Mexico as the cheap producing countries for their northern
markets. US and Canadian growers have had to deal with the fast-growing imports from Mexico. In the Asia-
Pacific region, European Union is under siege from cheap imported vegetables from China.
The smashing Spanish success of the 1990’s had its origin in good climate conditions, growing long-life
tomatoes to acceptable quality using cheap growing techniques in plastic greenhouses and cheap labour. The
growing season was also longer. The much lower cost of production compared to Holland, combined with
large EU subsidies and the constant devaluation of the Spanish peseta, also made for cheaper Spanish exports.
A third group of Dutch growers made delivery arrangements with large exporters on a yearly basis. Some of
these exporters also formed grower associations to take advantage of EU subsidies for marketing activities.
As a consequence of the European over-production, Dutch growers and exporters searched for new products
and far away markets. Rather than focusing on long-shelf life, they started breeding for taste, which led to the
development of ‘truss’ or ‘cluster’ tomatoes and coloured peppers now present in North American and
Japanese markets. The improved ‘clean and green’ image of Dutch products using Integrated Pest
Management strategies has put pressure on Spanish imports, which are now seen to be not so careful with Ag
chemicals.
Research is no longer supported by government, but funded by grower groups. The Dutch financing
infrastructure is good, and specialised banks understand the vegetable sector and stimulate growth with
investments. Dutch growers are now able to meet the requirements of the most demanding European
supermarkets. They are also more flexible with year-round and last minute delivery, high quality standards,
safe food, certification and ‘tracing and tracking’.
However, there are still many challenges ahead for the Dutch industry. Cost price is still high and productivity
increases only by high investments. Dutch growers are also hindered by many rules and regulations imposed
on them by the Dutch government and the EU. And of course, with a shortage of locations to build new
greenhouses, there is a need to re-organise older greenhouses.
After a decade of reorganisation and redirections, the Dutch greenhouse vegetable industry is on its way back
to the top. While Spain still has lower production costs, growers now need to invest in better technology and
knowledge to meet the increasing market requirements demanded by supermarkets. This will drive their
production costs upward as they feel the threat of cheaper imports from Morocco and Turkey once they have
free access to the EU markets. Turkey and Morocco have similar climate conditions to Spain, they have
significant low-tech greenhouse industries, and are working hard to meet the requirements to enter the EU.
Like the Dutch a decade earlier, it’s now up to Spain to change its direction. Unless Spanish growers change,
they will not be able to distinguish their product from the cheaper imports from Morocco or Turkey.
As a global industry, countries with developed hydroponic and greenhouse industries need to share aspects of
their technology with less developed countries to produce safe fruits and vegetables in sustainable growing
systems. Investments in high technology greenhouses in Spain by Dutch organisations, and similar
investments in the Mexican greenhouse industry by Canadian and US growers to fill seasonal gaps in high
quality tomato products, points the way for investment opportunities for European Union and New Zealand
industry stakeholders to share their technology with less developed industries in Asia.
61
So, the challenge ahead for hydroponic growers worldwide is to develop water-efficient, sustainable growing
systems to supply high quality, safe products that are needed for a quality of life while maintaining a healthy
planet. To achieve this goal, the hydroponics industry worldwide needs to:
• invest in food technology research, including biotechnology;

• develop more efficient production systems with smaller footprints and demands on natural resources;
• develop better greenhouse designs and construction materials that optimise climate control;
• invest in renewable energy resources, such as the development of cheaper plastic solar cells;
• encourage industry recognition and support by governments; share technology with less developed
hydroponic and greenhouse industries.
• adopt recycling technology which offsets the need for soil, water and energy to produce crops and
dramatically reduce natural resource use;
• develop new sustainable pest and disease control practices, without pesticides and fungicides;
4.1. Technical Challenges

Aquaponics system design and application can be considered a highly multidisciplinary approach drawing
from environmental, mechanical and civil engineering design concepts as well as aquatic and plant related
biology, biochemistry, and biotechnology. System specific measurements and control technologies also
require knowledge of subjects related to the field of computer science for automatic control systems. This high
level of complexity necessarily demands in-depth knowledge and expertise of all involved fields. The biggest
challenge in commercial aquaponics is its multi-disciplinarity, needing further expertise in economics, finance
and marketing. Thus, a high degree of field-specific insight in terms of both practical and in-depth theoretical
knowledge is required. This leads to an increasing level of complexity, which directly affects the efficiency
factors of the running system. In the interest of highest efficiency and productivity, some numerical trade-offs
are recommended and are outlined below. They include pH stabilization, nutrient balance, phosphorus, and
pest management.
4.2. Nutrient Balance

As an innovative sustainable food production system, the challenge in aquaponics is to use the nutrient input
efficiently, minimizing its discard and tending to a zero-discharge recirculating system.
Fish feed, the main nutrient input, can be divided into assimilated feed, uneaten feed, and soluble and solid
fish excreta. Soluble excreta are mainly ammonia and is the most available mineral until it is successively
transformed into nitrite and nitrate by nitrifying bacteria Lekang, et al., 2000. Both uneaten feed and solid
faeces need to be solubilized from organic material to ionic mineral forms that are easily assimilated by plants.
Minerals have different solubilization rates and do not accumulate equally, which influences their
concentrations in the water. All involved microorganisms and chemical and physical mechanisms of
solubilization are not well understood. Under current practices in RAS, the solid wastes are only partially
solubilized as they are mechanically filtered out on a daily basis Cripps, et al.,2000. These filtered wastes can
be externally fully mineralized and reinserted into the hydroponic beds. Given the objective of obtaining a low
environmental footprint, a zero-discharge recirculating system concept should be achievable according to
Neori et al. 2007, but more research needs to be carried out on fish waste solubilization with the objective to
transform all added nutrients into plant biomass. There are two methods for mineralizing organic material that
could be implemented: (1) anoxic digestion in special mineralization or settling units using bioleaching
abilities of heterotrophic bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus plantarum) Jung, et al.,2011 and/or (2) using earthworm
species such as Lumbricus rubellus capable of converting organic wastes to water enriching compounds in wet
62
composting or grow beds Bajsa, et al.,2003. Vermiculture can facilitate a high degree of mineralization as
worm casts contain micro- and macronutrients broken down from organic compounds Torri, et al.,2010.
Addition of external sources (e.g., food waste) of feed for the worms to provide the aquaponic system with
additional organic fertilizers has also been suggested Jorgensen, et al.,2009.
Feed composition directly affects the nutrient excretion by fish, consequently affecting the water chemistry.
One challenge is to find the right fish feed composition for aquaponics in order to attain a water composition
that is as close as possible to hydroculture requirements. There is a need to establish the macro- and
micronutrient proportion that fish can release in the water for a given feed in a given system; this depends on
fish species, fish density, temperature, and type of plants (i.e., fruity plants or leafy greens). Thus, fish feed
composition should be adapted to minimize this mineral addition while ensuring required nutrition properties
for fish yield and avoiding phytotoxic mineral accumulation (e.g., Na). The fish feed origin regarding its
environmental footprint should also be taken into account. Low trophic fish species should be preferred and
alternative production solutions should be promoted such as human food waste recycling, insects, worms,
aquatic weed, and algae as a feed base Van Huis, 2011. Also, some fish–plant couples might be more
appropriate than others in terms of overlap between nutrients profiles offered by excreta and nutrient profiles
demanded by plants. Identifying these couples would assure an optimum use of the available nutrients.
There is a lack of knowledge about the nature of organic molecules and the biochemical processes occurring
for their assimilation by plants. Some can be taken up directly or need complex biodegradation to make them
available. Another difference is the microflora inherent to aquaponics while sterilization occurs in
hydroponics. This microflora can have significant beneficial effects on plant growth and organic molecules’
assimilation. Hence, some aquaponics investigators report similar or even better yield than hydroponics for
some crops, despite lower concentrations of mineral nutrients.
Voogt, 2002, identifies three aspects of the hydroponic nutrient solution composition that should be taken into
account in aquaponics: (1) elemental uptake ratio compared to nutrient composition; (2) ease of uptake of
specific elements; (3) the type of growing system that also require a specific nutrient composition. The
composition of a nutrient solution must reflect the uptake ratios of individual elements by the crop, otherwise
it will lead to either accumulation or depletion of certain elements. As the demand between crops differ, the
basic compositions of nutrients solutions are crop specific. The uptake of elements differs widely, the
absorption of some can be more difficult and necessitates relatively higher
ratios than the straightforward uptake ratio of the crop. Additional research should be carried out to assess the
optimum value of mineral concentration per single crop or hybrid multi-crop systems regarding growth rate
and crop yield. Optimal suspended organic solids’ level should be identified with respect to its impact on
vegetative growth.
Also, a special emphasis should be placed on crop quality since productivity should not be the only argument
for competitiveness. For output purposes, this should be compared to (1) hydroponic crop grown with mineral
nutrient solution; (2) conventionally soil-based agricultural methods; and (3) organic soil-based agricultural
methods. Within-system comparative studies address the productivity, as the macro- and micronutrient
composition of the products will play a decisive role with respect to future orientation of healthy and efficient
quality food production. A deeper understanding of the biochemical processes occurring in solid fish waste
solubilization is necessary with the aim to increase mineral levels in aquaponic water by implementing process
and specific waste biofiltration units.
63
4.3. Phosphorous
Among the different minerals, phosphorus (P) deserves a specific attention. It is a macronutrient, which is
assimilated by plants in its ionic orthophosphate form (H2PO4−, HPO42−, PO43−). It is essential for both
vegetative and flowering stages of plant growth. In RAS, 30%–65% of the phosphorus added to the system via
fish feed is lost in the form of fish solid excretion that is filtered out by either settling tanks or mechanical
filters Schneider, et al., 2005. Moreover, organic P solubilized as orthophosphate can precipitate with calcium
(e.g., hydroxyapatite–Ca5(PO4)3(OH)) making these elements less available in solution. Consequently,
aquaponic experiments report a range of 1–17 mg L−1 PO4-P Villarroell, et al.,2011. However, recommended
concentrations in standard hydroponics are generally between 40 and 60 mg L−1 PO4-P Sikawa, et al.,2010.
This discrepancy suggests that phosphate should be added to aquaponic systems, especially for fruity
vegetables that do not yet show satisfying yields in aquaponics. Phosphorus is a finite and scarce mining
resource and subsequently, an expensive component of hydroponic solutions. Sufficient phosphorus
production will certainly be a major concern in the near future. Therefore, solutions to reuse the discharge of
P-rich effluents must be explored Shu, et al.,2006.
4.4. Pest and Disease Management

The challenges of pest and disease management is another aspect that needs further improvement. Aquaponic
systems are characterized by a broader range of microflora than conventional hydroponic systems, especially
because the breeding of fish and biofiltration occurs in the same water loop. Conventional pesticides that are
used in hydroponics cannot be used in aquaponics because of toxicity risk to the fish and to the desired biofilm
(e.g., autotrophic nitrifying biofilm) Nichols, et al.,2012. The need to maintain the nitrification biofilm and
other nutrient solubilizing microorganisms also prevents the use of antibiotics and fungicides for fish pathogen
control and removal in the aquatic environment.
Furthermore, antibiotics are not allowed for plant application so their use against fish pathogens must be
avoided in aquaponic systems. These constraints demand innovative pest and disease management solutions
for fish and plants that minimize impacts on fish and desired microorganisms. Plant and fish pests and
pathogens can be divided into four different categories based on specific alternative treatment solutions. These
are (1) plant pests—mostly insects that damage the leaves and roots (e.g., aphids, spider plants; (3) fish
parasites (e.g., monogenea, cestoda); and (4) fish diseases caused by viruses and microorganisms. Rearing and
crop practices that decrease the occurrence of diseases could be applied such as preventive sanitary measures,
low density of fish and/or plants, and/or control of environmental conditions, which decrease relative humidity
around the plants. In addition to these practices, a few innovative methods of biocontrol already exist for
plants cultivated under field or greenhouse conditions. These methods are based on the use of microorganisms
with biocontrol activity, or extracts of such microorganisms or extracts of plants (including essential oils) that
show high antimicrobial efficiency and short residence time Kouassi, et al.,2012. It will be a challenge to
select and adapt these methods to aquaponics systems, considering their compatibility with the other living
organisms of the system.
Furthermore, microbial diversity can be beneficial for plants. The presence of some mutualistic promoting
growth (e.g., plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and plant growth-promoting fungi). Since the presence of a
broad range microflora belongs to aquaponic practices, the occurrence of pathogens and risk for human health
should also be established, in order to assess the safety of aquaponics and to conduct appropriate quality
control. These challenges can lead to the production of products that are quality and pesticide free certified
(e.g., organic) and thereby achieve a higher prize in the market and leads to a healthier population
Crinnion,2010.
64
4.5. pH Stabilization
A crucial point in aquaponic systems is the pH stabilization, as it is critical to all living organisms within a
cycling system that includes fish, plants and bacteria. The optimal pH for each living component is different.
Most plants need a pH value between 6 and 6.5 in order to enhance the uptake of nutrients. The fish species
Tilapia (Oreochromis) is known to be disease-resistant and tolerant to large fluctuations in pH value with a
tolerance between pH 3.7 and 11, but achieves best growth performance between pH 7.0 and 9.0. The
nitrifying bacteria have a higher optimum pH, which is above 7. Villaverde 2010, observed that nitrification
efficiency increased linearly by 13% per pH unit within a pH range between
5.0 and 9.0 with the highest activity of ammonium oxidizers at 8.2. Similar observations were made by
Antoniou et al. 1990, who report the overall nitrification pH of approximately 7.8. There are three major
bacteria, for which optimal pH conditions are as follows: (1) Nitrobacter: 7.5 Keen, et al, 1987; (2)
Nitrosomonas: 7.0–7.5 Hatayama, et al,2000; and (3) Nitrospira: 8.0–8.3 Blackburne, et al, 2007.
Based on these data, the highest possible pH value should be consistent with the prevention of ammonia
accumulation in the system. Then, the ideal pH value for the system is between 6.8 and 7.0. Although root
uptake of nitrate raises pH as bicarbonate ions are released in exchange, the acidity producing nitrification
process has a higher impact on the overall system pH, leading to a constant and slight decrease in the pH-
value.
4.6. Other Technical Challenges

The regulation of the nitrate level in aquaponics is another challenge. Leafy vegetables need
100–200 mg L−1 of NO3-N concentration, while fruity vegetables need lower level at species specific growth
stages Resh, 2012. Intermittent intervals of high nitrate can be harmful for fish and nitrate concentration must
stay under a certain threshold to avoid adverse physical effects to species (e.g., 100, 140, 250 mg L−1 NO3-N
for Oncorhynchus mykiss, Clarias gariepinus, Oreochromis niloticus, respectively Webster, et al.,2008).
Therefore, it is of particular relevance to determine the best practical means (BPM) fish: plant ratio before
setup and/or implement a flow-controlled denitrification unit in the system in order to be able to adjust the
desired nitrate level. Some denitrification tanks are already used in RAS Martins, et al.,2010, however, the
technology is not yet fully developed. The approach involves creating anoxic conditions in a column by using
the sludge as an organic carbon source for heterotrophic denitrifying microorganisms and recirculates the
nitrate-rich water through it. If anoxic conditions are applied in sludge, heterotrophic microorganisms are able
to use nitrate instead of oxygen as electron acceptor and reduce it successively to gaseous nitrogen (N2)
Kampschreur, et al., 2009. A critical step is to guarantee additional bio filtration before discharging the treated
water back into the system to reduce the risk of toxic NO2− ions from the denitrification process entering the
system.
Together with environmental conditions, the population density is the most important parameter for the fish
well-being. In outdoor aquaponics facilities such as the UVI system, the common tilapia fish density without
use of pure oxygen is around 30–40 kg m−3. A higher density up to 60 kg m−3 can be achieved in
greenhouses Losordo, et al., 1999, this may be due to more algae and cyanobacteria blooms under longer
daylight conditions, producing more oxygen from increased photosynthesis. These characteristics, however,
cannot be generalized. In fact, different fish species require different optimal water quality; e.g., warm water
species tilapia require a dissolved oxygen (DO) level of 4–6 mg L−1, whereas the cold water species trout
needs at least 6–8 mg L−1 DO. Dissolved oxygen is not the only factor that needs to be kept stable. Large
fluctuations in temperature and pH might harm fish, plants, and nitrifying microorganisms Zhu, et al., 2002.
Despite this fact, temperatures for warm water species such as tilapia and nitrifying bacteria can be 25 °C–30
65
°C, whereas most plants rather prefer colder water temperatures (approx. 20 °C–25 °C). Thus far, aquaponics
has been built on a trade-off between the needs of fish and plants, respectively.
Development is now needed to achieve optimal conditions for both fish and plants with either:
(1) emphasis on interdependent parameters of both system components (e.g., combining fish and
plant species that preferably require similar environmental conditions within the same range of
temperatures and pH that ensure bacterial nitrification); or
(2) the physical separation in two recirculating loops, i.e., an aquaculture and hydroponic loop,
described as decoupled systems, where optimal condition for each system is applied with periodic
water exchange between them. These are different types of solutions that may contribute to the
breakthrough of commercial aquaponics.
5. Socio-Ecological Challenges
Aquaponics as such is also responding to diverse ecological and social challenges, which point to the
importance to focus on efficient and sustainable forms of agricultural production. Socio-ecological challenges
include mineral recycling, water scarcity, energy availability, overfishing, as well as urban farming and short
supply chains. They are outlined below.
5.1. Water
An increasing number of countries are facing economic and physical water scarcity, leading to a growing
incapability in feeding their people. On average, global agriculture uses around 70% of the available
freshwater resources. In arid climate zones such as the Middle East and North Africa, the agricultural water
consumption can even be up to 90% FAO, 2005. Compared to conventional agriculture, aquaponics uses less
than 10% of water, depending on the climatic conditions Bernstein, 2011. Aquaponics can reduce fresh water
depletion associated with irrigation whilst guaranteeing safe encouraging sustainable farming and food
production practices, which in turn reduces the freshwater consumption in countries facing water stress.
System related water losses that occur in evaporation, plant transpiration and the water content of the
agricultural products can be compensated for by capturing water from air humidity or by reverse osmosis
desalination plant in coastal areas Greenlee, et al., 2009.
5.2. Overfishing
Eighty percent of the world’s oceans are fully- or over-exploited, depleted or in a state of collapse. One
hundred million tons of fish are consumed worldwide each year, providing 2.5 billion people with at least 20%
of their average per capita animal protein intake FAO, 2012. Fish is one of the most efficient animal protein
producers, with a food conversion ratio (FCR) between 1 and 2 Belal, 2005. Since fish demand is increasing
whilst the fishing grounds are overexploited aquaculture is the fastest growing sector of world food production
FAO, 2012. Adverse effects of this development include the high water consumption in case of conventional
fish protein production and release of up to 80% of N and 85% of P per
kg of fish feed into the environment. This causes the loss of valuable nutrients, resulting in eutrophication in
rivers, lakes and coastal waters, and excessive productivity leading to vast dead zones in the oceans Dybas,
2005. However, it has to be noted that high-protein fishmeal and fish oil are still key components of
aquaculture feeds FAO, 2014. Between 2010 and 2012, 23% of captured fish was reduced to fishmeal and fish
oil FAO, 2014. Decreasing the proportion of both fishmeal and fish oil in fish feed is thus a challenge that
needs to be addressed.
66
5.3. Urban Farming and Short Supply Chains

Aquaponic systems can be set up almost everywhere and have the potential to (sub-)urbanize food production.
This could bring important socio-environmental benefits. Aquaponic farming plants could be implemented in
old industrial neglected buildings with the advantages of re-establishing a sustainable activity without
increasing urbanization pressure on land. Roof gardens would be another possibility, allowing the saving of
space in urban areas. If greenhouses are used on roofs, they can insulate buildings while producing food.
Another important aspect is minimizing the distance between the food producer and consumer. The longer the
supply chain, the more transport, packaging, conservation and
labor needed, leading to substantial decreases of resources and energy (e.g., up to 79% of the retail price in US
conventional food distribution Wohlgenant, 2001). Shortening and simplifying the food supply chains can
drastically diminish their environmental impacts, while providing cities with fresher products. This also allows
the consumer to clearly identify his food origin Toumi, 2010. Nevertheless, one should not underestimate the
development of rural locations, where farmland is plentiful. As aquaponics can be considered a high-tech
agricultural method, it is necessary to assure knowledge transfer in this field to maintain skilled labour forces.
5.4. Mineral Recycling

In terms of sustainability, both phosphorus and potassium are major components of agricultural fertilizers, and
like oil, they are non-renewable resources. Therefore, increasing use and depletion of these minerals without
reuse or recapture has a negative impact on and is of significance to their future supply. This in turn would
have dramatic consequences for global food security. Nutrient recycling policies, especially for phosphorus,
are crucial in order to avoid global food shortages Sverdrup,et al.,2011.
5.5. Energy
The energy requirements of aquaponics are likely to be based on system configuration (design, species, scale,
technologies) and geographic location (climate, available resources). For each location, different measures are
needed in order to ensure that each system will have a suitable sustainable energy source all year round to
provide stable conditions for fish and plants. This is crucial, as fluctuations in temperature might harm fish,
plants, and nitrifying microorganisms Zhu, 2002. This requirement constitutes a mandatory factor in regions
with constantly and seasonally changing climatic conditions as well as in hot and arid climatic zones. Ensuring
stable conditions may be achievable in equatorial areas without
additional technology. Harnessing solar energy can be beneficial in order to either run climate control systems
within greenhouses (e.g., via air conditioning operated by solar photovoltaic modules), or to heat up a low-
energy greenhouse with passive solar heating. The latter option is practicable for small sized non-commercial
(passive solar) greenhouses, but may not be suitable for larger greenhouses because of the high thermal
resistance and high energy losses, associated with medium and large greenhouses. These larger structures may
require alternative solutions. In countries such as Iceland and Japan, near-surface geothermal energy can be
used by means of heat pumps and direct geothermal heat for maintaining the indoor temperature at the desired
level Ragnarsson,2003. Countries with comparatively unfavorable geological conditions still might assess
possible options in terms of using waste heat of
combined heat and power (CHP) units to heat the greenhouse during cold days or cool them down during hot
days.
6. Economic Challenges
The current literature cannot be used to critically assess and predict economic challenges. At this early stage of
scientific research, the main focus has been on technical aspects of aquaponics; financial figures held by
private research entities are not shared with the public. Furthermore, it is difficult to compare the two systems
67
to determine which is better as information may not be available for all system parameters and outputs. For
example, light intensity (lm) was not reported by Rakocy et al. 2004, yet this is one of the major factors
affecting plant growth and thus the harvested biomass. Overall, system costs can be measured in the cost per
square meter, which is influenced by the complexity of the system and this is closely related to climatic and
geographic conditions such as seasonal daylight availability, temperature extremes, and fluctuation of warmth
and cold. Also, dynamic costs such as maintenance costs (i.e., price per kWh and labor) and sales revenues in
regional markets might differ, making it more difficult to make accurate economic evaluations. Even
comparing the most expensive item within a system is difficult, as it differs per region and country (e.g.,
electricity prices, heat availability, etc.).
This finding should be viewed with a degree of caution because of different domestic market
dependencies. Nonetheless, when addressing economic optimization, the three most important factors are: (1)
sustainability considerations, which, in the case of aquaponics, are interrelated with economic profits, since
the reuse of resources should cut costs for the producer and for the customer; (2) technical optimization of
processes (e.g., nutrient availability in different growth stages, nutrient recycling, etc.), and; (3) system
components (e.g., design of the hydrological regime, P recycling unit, pH stabilizing reactors, etc.).
Although Vermeulen and Kamstra 2013, state that the actual perceived environmental benefits of nutrient
reuse, energy efficiency and land use seem only marginally cost-effective, the aspects of possible differences
in product quality and societal value are not necessarily reflected in business costs. Also, the use and cost of
fertilizers in hydroponic production systems has an increasing importance, as fertilizer costs lie between 5%
and 10% of the overall costs, and scarce fossil fuels are required in their manufacture Hochmuth, et al, 2010.
The costing forecasts for fossil fuels could rather exacerbate the situation further and increase the demand of
alternative fertilizing solutions such as using waste. Another resource that becomes increasingly scarce is fresh
water. Reprocessing instead of discharging contaminated water will be a big challenge that needs to be met in
the future. Taxes for wastewater discharge or strong limitations in discharge by local or national policies
might become a factor as all point source discharges are regulated by water quality policies. Anticipating this
trend will ensure economic and financial advantages with respect to conventional agriculture or hydroponic
approaches.
7. Sustainability opportunities
7.1. Integrating nutrient flows
Nitrogen budgets for conventional field-grown vegetable crops are often formulated with the knowledge that a
portion of these inputs may be lost to the environment through leaching, runoff (Hochmuth, 2000). On a
global scale, the recovery of fertilizer N in crop production is ≈50%. Movement of fertilizer inputs, especially
N, and buildup of phosphorus (P) in the environment can adversely affect natural ecosystems and the water
resources they depend on (Mitsch and Gosselink, 2000). As a result, farmers are under pressure to reduce or
eliminate nutrient-laden water discharges to the environment (Neal et al., 1996).
Integrating nutrient flows between aquaculture and hydroponic systems turns a waste stream into a crop
production asset. Fertilizer costs can range from 5% to 10% of total crop production expenses because of the
large amount of fossil fuels needed for the manufacture of fertilizer (Hochmuth and Hanlon, 2010). It is
possible to produce most of the nutrients needed to grow crops in aquaponic systems through integrated
nutrient flows with the initial input being fish feed, although some supplementation with specific plant
nutrients such as calcium (Ca2+), potassium (K), and iron (Fe) will be required to maximize crop yields
(Rakocy et al., 1997). Calcium and K are used primarily to keep pH at optimum levels. Aquaponic systems
68
that rely solely on fish waste to supply nutrients for plants have reported low levels of P, K, Fe, and
manganese (Mn) (Adler et al., 1996) and P, sulfur (S), K, and Fe (Seawright et al., 1998) in recirculating
water. Plants' uptake of NH4+ and NO3− as well as other recirculating system nutrients like P reduces the waste
stream in aquaponics and turns an environmental liability into a biologically produced crop production asset.
7.2. Improving nutrient use efficiency.
In soils, nutrients move to the surface of roots by diffusion and bulk flow of the soil solution resulting from
transpiration (Taiz and Zeiger, 2006). Concentration gradients can form in the soil solution as nutrients are
taken up by the roots and the concentration of nutrients at the root surface is lowered compared with the
surrounding area. This can result in a nutrient depletion zone near the root surface. The capacity for
continuous growth by roots, however, extends this region of nutrient uptake beyond the depletion zone. Thus,
optimum nutrient acquisition by plants in nature depends on the capacity of their root systems not only to
absorb nutrients but also to grow into fresh soil.
In hydroponic production using soilless media, the media volume is finite and nutrient depletion can occur and
be recovered in the next irrigation event. Nitrogen depletion occurred at lower N (90 to 175 mg·L−1) nutrient
solution concentrations with intermittent fertigation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in rockwool media (Schon
and Compton, 1997). Irrigation frequencies that are sufficient to prevent water stress are not necessarily
adequate to prevent nutrient depletion except at high N (225 to 275 mg·L−1) nutrient solution concentrations.
Therefore, it seems logical to propose that more frequent flushing of the media even with a lower N
concentration solution could replenish N in the media, and if the flow was continuous, there would be no
appreciable depletion of nutrients in the root zone. This reasoning could apply to all nutrients in the solution.
Thus precipitation of certain nutrients at pH 8.0 may not limit the overall nutritional status of the plant,
provided continuous recirculation of the nutrient solution through the root/media zone occurs.
7.3. Reducing water use and discharge to the environment.
Designing agricultural production systems for zero discharge to the environment (zero agricultural discharge
system) has the potential to protect groundwater, makes water permitting easier to obtain, and will help
maintain the long-term sustainability of agricultural enterprises.
Greenhouse vegetable crops such as tomato, cucumber, and pepper (Capsicum annuum) require as much as
1.9 L of water per plant per day near the mature stage of growth (Hochmuth, 2001a). Given recommended
greenhouse plant densities (Marr, 1995), water use would be ≈4.5 L·m−2 per day. Thus a single plant moving
through its growth stages may use between 0.5 and 1.9 L of water per day depending on its growth stage and
size and the growing season or temperature. Water quality in aquaculture systems is maintained in part by
discharging effluent and replacing it with fresh water at 5% to 10% of recirculating water volume per day
(Timmons et al., 2002). If we assume an average of 1.2 L of water use per plant per day in a continuous
cropping system (with early and late plant stages represented), 100 plants could satisfy the effluent
discharge/freshwater replacement requirements of a recirculating aquaculture tank containing 4380 or 8760 L
(at 10% or 5% replacement, respectively) without the need to discharge effluent to the environment as the
plant system is absorbing the effluent.
Field-grown vegetable crops, including lettuce, tomato, pepper, and cucumber, have similar crop water
requirements based on the reference crop evapotranspiration (Qassim and Ashcroft, 2006). However, plant
69
densities and arrangements in hydroponics are different from field production (Resh, 2004), and sizing the
hydroponic sub-system may depend on plant type, density, and arrangement and their effect on water
requirements. More research is needed to establish sizing guidelines for various hydroponic crops and
aquaculture systems.
7.4. Importance of biofiltration to reduce NH3 and balance N uptake.
Except for oxygen, NH3 concentration is the most important water quality factor affecting fish (Francis-Floyd
et al., 2009). Ammonia is the main excretion product from fish and a by-product of uneaten feed. Ammonia is
toxic to fish at levels above 0.05 mg·L−1 (Francis-Floyd et al., 2009). The nitrification is the biological process
performed by nitrifying bacteria that reduces NH3 from the water (Gutierrez-Wing and Malone, 2006). Nitrate,
the end product of nitrification, is not toxic to fish except at very high levels [channel catfish (Ictalurus
punctatus) 96-h LC50 (lethal concentration at which 50% of the fish die in 96 h) > 6200 mg·L−1 NO3–N,
although some investigations suggest that prolonged exposure to 200 mg·L−1 NO3–N might decrease the
immune response of some fish species. Nitrate is the primary source of N for plants in hydroponic nutrient
solutions at concentrations from 50 to 280 mg·L−1 NO3–N (Resh, 2004).
Nitrogen, the nutrient required in largest amounts for the optimum production of plants, can be supplied by
fish in an aquaponic system (Rakocy, 1997). Root uptake by plants of NH4+ may be sufficient to reduce
reliance on biofilter nitrification for NH3 removal when sufficient plants are available in aquaponic systems
(Verhagen et al., 1994).
8. Education as a Necessity
To understand and implement the multidisciplinary concept of aquaponics a broad range of knowledge is
required. From the theoretical perspective, the multidisciplinarity of the field and a lack of training in holistic
thinking is a hurdle to fully comprehend the concept of aquaponics covering all interrelating issues. The
bundling of field-specific in-depth knowledge is required in order to consolidate available scientific
knowledge and evidence. At most universities, the two main disciplines, i.e., hydroponics and aquaculture, are
either not taught, or offered in different schools, which could complicate access and exchange of knowledge.
In practice, aquaculture and hydroponic technologies are well-known. The
problem lies in the fact that those disciplines need to be connected. This lack of information-sharing shows the
necessity for developing an education network dealing with the improvement of the interconnection between
(scientific) disciplines involved in this field. Aquaponic stakeholders, including researchers, entrepreneurs and
technicians, need to have basic knowledge covering all disciplines that are involved in this field. Furthermore,
experts within every connected field are required to address specific issues within theoretical, scientific,
financial as well as practical frameworks.
9. Discussion
Challenges underlying sustainable socio-ecological, technical and economic factors pertaining to aquaponics
are discussed in this paper to demonstrate the need and the means of extensively investing in more research
and development and education in the aquaponics sector. Taking these factors into account is necessary
because a pure financial perspective faces significant constraints, notably in terms of natural resource scarcity
and their long-term economic consequences. The commercial development of socially, ecologically, and
environmentally sustainable aquaponic systems confronts several technical challenges that need to be
addressed further: (1) improved nutrient solubilization and recovery for a better use of the nutrient input and
reducing extra-mineral addition, e.g., phosphorus recycling;
70
(2) adapted pest management; (3) reduce water consumption to a high degree by limiting the need for water
exchange; (4) use of alternative energy sources for hot/cold and arid areas (e.g., CHP waste heat, geothermal
heat, etc.); and (5) innovative pH stabilization methods by implementing fluidized lime-bed reactors that have
successfully been used in natural waters.
The systems to be developed should be universally applicable, which implies resource–economic (i.e.,
resource-saving) production systems that can be run in arid, hot, cold, and urban areas or any combination
thereof. Vermeulen and Kamstra 2013, report only a marginal cost reduction for environmental benefits of
nutrient reuse and energy efficiency when aquaponics is compared to RAS and hydroponics run separately.
However, this study did not take socio-ecological factors into account, such as operating in a resource (e.g.,
phosphorous, water) limited world. Energy cost and fertilizer prices are constantly rising and governmental
policies encourage reduction of emitted pollution (e.g., tax incentive schemes), so this cost margin benefit of
aquaponics is expected to rise. Although the highest financial profit margin has been shown with leafy greens,
it is still necessary to determine the purpose and the scale of the respective systems before building them; the
needs on a microeconomic level in terms of food self-sufficiency or local food supply might differ from profit-
oriented approaches and from country to country.
10. Conclusions
In aquaponics, the grower needs to understand the fish system and the crop system and must integrate between
them. Aquaponics can be a sustainable agricultural production system. Most plant nutrients can be derived
from fish feed through fish digestion/excretion and biofilter nitrification, thus integrating nutrient flow. Plants
can act as biofilters and take up system effluent that would otherwise be discharged to the environment. The
difficulty in finding a median growing environment among plants, fish, and nitrifying bacteria culture in
aquaponics has resulted in less integration of the systems than would be ideal for maximizing space and
infrastructure, thus reducing the potential overall adaptability and profitability of aquaponics. We know that
aquaponic systems management has been established for the lettuce/tilapia floating raft system, but more long-
term research/demonstrations should be conducted on sizing and managing other aquaponic crop/fish system
combinations to reduce adoption uncertainty.
Given the fact that aquaponics follows nutrient and water reusing principles, it seems to be a
promising solution for sustainable aquaculture and hydroponic practices. However, further research and
developments are needed as demonstrated by the challenges described in this paper. These challenges need to
be resolved with the aim to establish fully controlled and standardized aquaponic systems that will be easy to
handle and economically viable. The competitiveness of the production method depends on technological
developments, local markets, and climatic and geographic conditions that need to be assessed and cannot be
generalized. Only addressing those factors thoroughly will eventually validate aquaponics as a sustainable
food production alternative.
Even though plants provide a beneficial biofiltration role, nitrification is very important for the maintenance of
water quality and conversion of potentially harmful NH3 to NO3−. We suggest system sustainability could be
improved by maintaining water pH nearer the optimum for nitrification (pH 7.5–8.0) rather than the optimum
for plant production (pH 5.5–6.5), provided plant yields are not reduced. Other hydroponic vegetable crop
species should be tested under aquaponic conditions to determine how crop yields are affected by operating at
pH levels more suitable for biofilter nitrification to maximize long-term sustainability.
Balancing the aquaponic system environment for the optimum growth of three organisms will be an on-going
subject of research and refinement. Further aquaponic systems' adoption will require more public and private
71
resources to close many knowledge gaps in properly managing these systems and successfully marketing their
products to the public.
11. References
Adler, P.R., Takeda, F., Glenn, D.M., Summerfelt, S.T. (1996) Utilizing byproducts to enhance aquaculture
sustainability. World Aquaculture 27:24–26.
Antoniou, P.; Hamilton, J.; Koopman, B.; Jain, R.; Holloway, B.; Lyberatos, G.; Svoronos, S.A. Effect of
temperature and ph on the effective maximum specific growth rate of nitrifying bacteria. Water Res. 1990, 24,
97–101.
Bajsa, O.; Nair, J.; Mathew, K.; Ho, G.E. Vermiculture as a tool for domestic wastewater
management. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48, 125–132
Belal, I.E.H. A review of some fish nutrition methodologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96,
395–402.
Bernstein, S. Aquaponic Gardening: A Step-by-Step Guide to Raising Vegetables and Fish Together; New
Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2011; p. 256.
Blackburne, R.; Vadivelu, V.M.; Yuan, Z.; Keller, J. Kinetic characterisation of an enriched
Nitrospira culture with comparison to Nitrobacter. Water Res. 2007, 41, 3033–3042.
Crinnion, W.J. Organic foods contain higher levels of certain nutrients, lower levels of pesticides, and may
provide health benefits for the consumer. Altern. Med. Rev. 2010, 15, 4–12.
Cripps, S.J.; Bergheim, A. Solids management and removal for intensive land-based aquaculture production
systems. Aquac. Eng. 2000, 22, 33–56.
Damon, E.; Seawright, R.B.; Walker, R.R.S. Nutrient dynamics in integrated aquaculturehydroponics systems.
Aquaculture 1998, 160, 215–237.
D’Orbcastel, E.R.; Verreth, J.A.J. New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in

Europe: A perspective on environmental sustainability. Aquac. Eng. 2010, 43, 83–93.
Van Rijn, J. Waste treatment in recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac. Eng. 2013, 53, 49–56.
Dybas, C.L. Dead Zones Spreading in World Oceans. Bioscience 2005, 55, 552–557.
Endut, A.; Jusoh, A.; Ali, N.; Wan Nik, W.B.; Hassan, A. A study on the optimal hydraulic loading rate and
plant ratios in recirculation aquaponic system. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1511–1517.
FAO. AQUASTAT Survey, Irrigation in Africa in Figures; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2005.
FAO. Statistical Yearbook; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; p. 366.
72
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp. 1–243.
Francis, C.; Lieblein, G.; Gliessman, S.; Breland, T.A.; Creamer, N.; Harwood, R.; Salomonsson, L.;
Helenius, J.; Rickerl, D.; Salvador, R.; et al. Agroecology: The Ecology of Food Systems. J. Sustain. Agric.
2003, 22, 99–118.
Francis-Floyd, R., Watson, C., Petty, D., Pouder, D.B. (2009) Ammonia in aquatic systems (Univ. Florida,
Dept. Fisheries Aquatic Sci., Florida Coop. Ext. Serv. FA-16), <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FA031>. 27 Oct. 2010.
Greenlee, L.F.; Lawler, D.F.; Freeman, B.D.; Marrot, B.; Moulin, P. Reverse osmosis desalination: Water
sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res. 2009, 43, 2317–2348.
Gutierrez-Wing, M., Malone, R.F. (2006) Biological filters in aquaculture: Trends and research directions for
freshwater and marine applications. Aquacult. Eng. 34:163–171.
Hatayama, R.; Takahashi, R.; Ohshima, M.; Shibasaki, R.; Tokuyama, T. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate
carboxylase/oxygenase from an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium, Nitrosomonas sp. K1: Purification and
properties. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 90, 426–430.
Hochmuth, G.J. (2001) Greenhouse cucumber production: Florida greenhouse vegetable production
handbook (Univ. Florida, Hort. Sci. Dept., Florida Coop. Ext. Serv. HS790), <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/cv268>.
Vol. 3, 27 Oct. 2010.
Hochmuth, G.J., Hanlon, E.A. (1995) IFAS standard fertilization recommendations for vegetable crops (Univ.
Florida, Hort. Sci. Dept., Florida Coop. Ext. Serv. Cir. 1152).
Hochmuth, G.J.; Hanlon, E.A. Commercial Vegetable Fertilization Principles; #SL319;

Horticultural Sciences Department: Gainesville, USA, 2010; pp. 1–17.
Jorgensen, B.; Meisel, E.; Schilling, C.; Swenson, D.; Thomas, B. Developing food production systems in
population centers. Biocycle 2009, 50, 27–29.
Jung, I.S.; Lovitt, R.W. Leaching techniques to remove metals and potentially hazardous nutrients from trout
farm sludge. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5977–5986.
Kampschreur, M.J.; Temmink, H.; Kleerebezem, R.; Jetten, M.S.M.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Nitrous oxide
emission during wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2009, 43, 4093–4103.
Keen, G.A.; Prosser, J.I. Interrelationship between pH and surface growth of Nitrobacter. Soil Biol. Biochem.
1987, 19, 665–672.
Klinger, D.; Naylor, R. Searching for Solutions in Aquaculture: Charting a Sustainable Course. Annu. Rev.
Environ. Resour. 2012, 37, 247–276.
Kouassi, K.H.S.; Bajji, M.; Jijakli, H. The control of postharvest blue and green molds of citrus in relation
with essential oil–wax formulations, adherence and viscosity. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 73, 122–128.
73
Lehman, H.; Clark, E.A.; Weise, S.F. Clarifying the definition of Sustainable agriculture. J. Agric. Environ.
Ethics 1993, 6, 127–143.
Lekang, O.-I.; Kleppe, H. Efficiency of nitrification in trickling filters using different filter media. Aquac.
Eng. 2000, 21, 181–199.
Losordo, T.M.; Masser, M.P.; Rakocy, J.E. Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production
Systems-A Review of Component Options; Southern Regional Aquaculture Center: Stoneville, MS,USA, 1999.
Marr, C.W. (1995) Commercial greenhouse production: Greenhouse cucumbers (Kansas State Univ., Agr.
Expt. Sta., Coop. Ext. Serv. MF-2075).
Mitsch, W.J., Gosselink, J.G. (2000) Wetlands (Wiley, New York), 3rd ed.
Neal, C.A., Tyson, R.V., Hanlon, E.A., White, J.M., Cox, S. (1996) Reducing nutrient applications for
vegetable production in the Lake Apopka basin. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 109:156–159.
Neori, A.; Krom, M.D.; van Rijn, J. Biogeochemical processes in intensive zero-effluent marine fish culture
with recirculating aerobic and anaerobic biofilters. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 2007, 349, 235–247.
Nichols M.A.; Savidov, N.A. Aquaponics: A nutrient and water efficient production system.
Acta Hortic. 2012, 947, 129–132.
Qassim, A., Ashcroft, B. (2006) Estimating vegetable crop water use with moisture-accounting method (State
of Victoria Agr. Notes AG 1192),
Ragnarsson, Á. Utilization of geothermal energy in Iceland. In Proceedings of the International Geothermal

Conference, Reykjavík, Iceland, 14–17 September 2003.
Rakocy, J.E. (1997) in Tilapia aquaculture in the Americas, Integrating tilapia culture with vegetable
hydroponics in recirculating systems, eds Costa-Pierce B.A., Rakocy J.E. (World Aquaculture Soc, Baton
Rouge, LA), Vol. 1, pp 163–184.
Rakocy, J.E.; Masser, M.P.; Losordo, T.M. Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems:
Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture; Southern Regional Aquaculture Center: Stoneville, MS,
USA, 2006; pp. 1–16.
Rakocy, J.E.; Shultz, R.C.; Bailey, D.S.; Thoman, E.S. Aquaponic production of tilapia and basil: Comparing
a batch and staggered cropping system. Acta Hortic. 2004, 648, 63–69.
Resh, H.M. (2004) Hydroponic food production (New Concept Press, Mahwah, NJ), 6th ed.
Resh, H.M. Hydroponic Food Production: A Definitive Guidebook for the Advanced Home
Gardener and the Commercial Hydroponic Grower; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012.
74
Rakocy, J.E.; Shultz, R.C.; Bailey, D.S.; Thoman, E.S. Aquaponic production of tilapia and basil: Comparing
a batch and staggered cropping system. Acta Hortic. 2004, 648, 63–69.
Seawright, D.E., Stickney, R.R., Walker, R.B. (1998) Nutrient dynamics in integrated aquaculture-
hydroponics systems. Aquaculture 160:215–237.
Schon, M.K., Compton, M.P. (1997) Nitrogen and phosphorus requirements for rockwool grown cucumbers
trained with a double-stem method. HortTechnology 7:33–38.
Schneider, O.; Sereti, V.; Eding, E.H.; Verreth, J.A.J. Analysis of nutrient flows in integrated
intensive aquaculture systems. Aquac. Eng. 2005, 32, 379–401.
Shu, L.; Schneider, P.; Jegatheesan, V.; Johnson, J. An economic evaluation of phosphorus
recovery as struvite from digester supernatant. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 2211–2216.
Sikawa, D.C.; Yakupitiyage, A. The hydroponic production of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L) by using hybrid
catfish (Clarias macrocephalus × C. gariepinus) pond water: Potentials and constraints. Agric. Water Manag.
2010, 97, 1317–1325.
Sverdrup, H.U.; Ragnarsdottir, K.V. Challenging the planetary boundaries II: Assessing the
sustainable global population and phosphate supply, using a systems dynamics assessment model. Appl.
Geochem. 2011, 26, S307–S310.
Taiz, L., Zeiger, E. (2006) Plant physiology (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), 4th ed.
Timmons, M.B., Ebeling, J.M., Wheaton, F.W., Summerfelt, S.T., Vinci, B.J. (2002) Recirculating
aquaculture systems (Northeastern Reg. Aquaculture Ctr. Pub. No. 01–002), 2nd ed.
Torri, S.I.; Puelles, M.M. Use of vermiculture technology for waste management and
environmental remediation in Argentina. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 2010, 10, 239–254.
Toumi, S.; Vidal, R. A Comparison of Urban Agriculture and Short Food Chains in Paris and
Tunis. Urban Agric. Mag. 2010, 24, 31–34.
UN. Human development report 2013. Available online:

http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2013_EN_complete.pdf (accessed on 13 August 2014).
Van Huis, A. Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2011, 58,
563–583.
Verhagen, F.J.M., Hageman, P.E.G., Woldendorp, J.W., Laanbroek, H.J. (1994) Competition for ammonium
between nitrifying bacteria and plant roots in soil pots: Effects of grazing flagellates and fertilization. Soil
Biol. Biochem. 26:89–96.
Vermeulen, T.; Kamstra, A. The need for systems design for robust aquaponic systems in the urban
environment. 2013, 1004, 71–78.
75
Villarroell, M.; Alvarino, J.M.R.; Duran, J.M. Aquaponics: Integrating fish feeding rates and ion waste
production for strawberry hydroponics. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 2011, 9, 537–545.
Voogt, W. Potassium Management of Vegetables Under Intensive Growth Conditions; Pasricha, N.S., Bansal,
S.K., Eds.; The International Potash Institute: Bern, Switzerland, 2002; pp. 347–362.
Webster, C.D.; Lim, C. Tilapia; CRC-Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008.
Wohlgenant, M.K. Chapter 16 Marketing margins: Empirical analysis. Handb. Agric. Econ. 2001, 1, 933–970.
Zhu, S.; Chen, S. The impact of temperature on nitrification rate in fixed film biofilters.
Aquac. Eng. 2002, 26, 221–237.
76

Aquaponic Kenya

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aquaponic Kenya

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aquaponic Kenya

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology ISSN: 2313-3759 Vol. 2 No.

11; November 2015

Challenges and Opportunities to Sustainability in Aquaponic and

1 Technical University of Mombasa (TUM),

1 National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI),

P. O. Box Number 30623-00100 Nairobi, Kenya.

Research was supported by: TUM and NACOSTI

4. Challenges Faced by the Hydroponics Industry Worldwide

• invest in food technology research, including biotechnology;

4.1. Technical Challenges

4.2. Nutrient Balance

4.4. Pest and Disease Management

4.6. Other Technical Challenges

5.3. Urban Farming and Short Supply Chains

5.4. Mineral Recycling

7.1. Integrating nutrient flows

7.2. Improving nutrient use efficiency.

7.3. Reducing water use and discharge to the environment.

7.4. Importance of biofiltration to reduce NH3 and balance N uptake.

D’Orbcastel, E.R.; Verreth, J.A.J. New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in

FAO. Statistical Yearbook; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; p. 366.

Hochmuth, G.J.; Hanlon, E.A. Commercial Vegetable Fertilization Principles; #SL319;

Ragnarsson, Á. Utilization of geothermal energy in Iceland. In Proceedings of the International Geothermal

UN. Human development report 2013. Available online:

You might also like