CE Struc Seismic-Fragility Final
CE Struc Seismic-Fragility Final
CE Struc Seismic-Fragility Final
Abstract - Earthquakes are amongst the most destructive disasters in the world, especially in the advent of rapid development and
unprecedented rise of buildings. During earthquakes, buildings are potentially one of the most vulnerable infrastructures. Cagayan
de Oro City is a rising metropolis and also an educational hub of the region. Thus, public school buildings are also on the rise,
with more than 600 classrooms built in the last six years. It is therefore imperative to know the structural performance of these
buildings should large earthquakes hit the city. This study determined the structural capacity of eight public high school buildings
subjected to potentially large earthquakes. The selected buildings were modelled and further subjected to pushover analysis. Using
the pushover results, fragility curves for each building were generated using the Fragility through Capacity Spectrum Assessment
method. The structural capacity is presented through fragility curves, which describes the probability of failure and level of
performance or damage states of these buildings at different ground motions. Results show that the dominant damage to be
observed by these schools during expected earthquake ground motions experienced in Cagayan de Oro City is “Moderate
Damage” where buildings will observe cracking in most beams and columns, and some yielding in a limited number. The results
can be used by government to prioritize which school buildings should undergo strengthening and retrofitting programs. The study
also came up with structural design recommendations and practices that could potentially improve the structural performance of
future school buildings.
Keywords: Capacity Spectrum, Pushover Analysis, Peak Ground Acceleration, Fragility Curve
20000
BASE SHEAR (KN)
15000
0
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
DISPLACEMENT (M)
Figure 5 shows the summarized fragility curves of “Slight Fig. 6. Fragility Curves of “Light” Damage State
Damage” of the eight selected public high school buildings.
Plotting the earthquake ground motion with the highest Table 5. Percentage Range for Light Damage State with PGA
probability of striking Cagayan de Oro City of 0.3g – 0.4g from 2.942 m/s2 to 3.923 m/s2
(2.942 m/s2 – 3.923 m/s2) on the figure, the following School Light Damage (%)
numerical values for each school to experience “Slight Agusan NHS 99 – 100
Damage” are shown in Table 4. Balulang NHS 99 – 100
Bugo NHS 99 – 100
Cagayan de Oro NHS 99 – 100
Carmen NHS 100
Lumbia NHS 100
Pagatpat NHS Bldg. 1 100
Pagatpat NHS Bldg. 2 100
V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researchers would like to thank Dr. Arash Nassirpour and
Engr. Garnelo Cupay for sharing their profound wisdom during
the course of the research. Also, the researchers are immensely
grateful to the City Engineers’ Office for providing the
Fig. 8. Fragility Curves of “Extensive” Damage State necessary plans of the eight selected public high school
buildings. To Xavier University’s Kinaadman Support for
Table 7. Percentage Range for Extensive Damage State with Student Research (KSSR), the researchers express their
PGA from 2.942 m/s2 to 3.923 m/s2 gratitude to the office for the financial grant that they have
School Extensive Damage (%) given to defray the research expenses.
Balulang NHS 8 – 43
Pagatpat NHS Bldg. 1 1 – 19 VI. REFERENCES
Pagatpat NHS Bldg. 2 15 – 33
Agusan NHS 0 [1]. ABS-CBN News (2016). West Valley Fault forces
demolition of school buildings. Retrieved from
Bugo NHS 0
https://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/metro-
Cagayan de Oro NHS 0
manila/06/21/16/west-valley-fault-forces-demolition-of-
Carmen NHS 0
school-buildings.
Lumbia NHS 0
[2]. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
IV. CONCLUSION (2017). Development of Fragility and Reliablity Curves
for Seismic Evaluation. Retrieved from
The study was able to accomplish seismic hazard assessment https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_1351.pdf.
of eight selected public high school buildings in Cagayan de
Oro City by determining its probability of failure due to [3]. Aljawhari, K. (n.d.). Effects of Aftershocks on the
earthquake loads. With the nonlinear static pushover analysis, Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. London:
the most vulnerable and critical members of the buildings are University College London.
commonly identified near the staircases and ramp areas when [4]. Arquiza, J. C. V. et al. (2017). Seismic Casualty Modeling
each building is pushed with lateral earthquake loads both in of Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures of Zone 2
the transversal and longitudinal directions. Generally, stair and And 5 Of Barangay Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City.
ramp elements are vulnerable to earthquakes because of their Cagayan de Oro City: Xavier University - Ateneo de
low ductile capacity and high probability to brittle failure. This Cagayan.
vulnerability is transferred to the supporting beams and
columns. Moreover, when the buildings are pushed in the two [5]. Baylon, M. and Graciano, L. E. (2013). Seismic Risk
major directions, structural elements that receive the weight of Assessment of Heritage Structure Using Fragility Curves
the buildings are the columns at the ends of the buildings and Net Present Value Approach. De La Salle University.
where most stairs are also located. For the columns near the [6]. Baylon, M. and Graciano, L. E. (2013). Seismic Risk
ramps, they are the structural members that carry most of the Assessment of Heritage Structure Using Fragility Curves
loads from the cantilever slabs in addition to the ramp slabs. and Net Present Value Approach. De La Salle
Consequently, evacuation routes and emergency exit points University.Baylon, M. et al. (2015). Seismic Assessment
during earthquakes are limited to the stairs and ramps in the of LRT Line 1 South Extension Pier. Mapua Institute of
building. From the results, strengthening measures should be Technology.
applied by considering the vulnerability of stairs and ramps
against seismic activities. [7]. Bayraktar, E. et al. (2017). Earthquake Performance of
Reinforced-Concrete Shear-Wall Structure Using
Based on the seismic fragility assessment of the eight selected Nonlinear Methods. American Society of Civil Engineers.
public high school buildings, it was observed that buildings doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001117.
having more basic structural designs are more fragile during [8]. Brizuela, K. S. and Oreta, A. C. (2013). A Computer-
seismic activities. More so, buildings with perpendicular or Aided Semi-Quantitative Seismic Risk Assessment Tool
diagonal connections resulted to stronger seismic performance for Safe School Buildings. Proceeding the 6th Civil
as it is evident in their respective fragility curves. Also, it was Engineering Conference in Asia Region: Embracing the
observed that buildings having ramps have a stronger seismic Future through. Manila, Philippines.
[9]. Chan, F. M. G. et al (2015). Seismic Risk Evaluation of [26]. Shehada, S. M. and Shurrab, S. Q. (n.d.). Seismic
the Nine Central Schools in the Division of Cagayan De Vulnerability Assessment of School Buildings: Gaza
Oro City: Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan. Strip Schools as a Case Study. Gaza Strip, Palestine:
Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic University of
[10]. Cimellaro, G. P. et al. (2014). Bidirectional Pushover
Gaza. Retrieved from: engineeringcivil.com/seismic-
Analysis of Irregular Structures. American Society of
vulnerability-assessment-of-school-buildings.html.
Civil Engineers. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-
541X.0001032. [27]. Shinozuka, M. et al. (2000). Statistical Analysis of
Fragility Curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,
[11]. Cupay, G. J. A. et al (2019). Flood and Seismic Fragility
126(12): 1224-1231.
Curve Analysis of Kagay-an Bridge in Cagayan De Oro
City: Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan. [28]. Shinozuka, M. et al. (2000). Nonlinear Static Procedure
for Fragility Curve Development. Journal of Engineering
[12]. FEMA (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of
Mechanics, 126(12): 1287-1295.
Buildings Volume 1 – Methodology. California: Federal
Emergency Management Agency. [29]. Spyridis, M. (n.d.). Earthquake Fragility of Major Dams
in the United States. London: University College London.
[13]. Grabow, S. et al., (2005). The Importance of
Government Facilities in Downtowns. Wisconsin: UW [30]. Themelis, S. (2008). Pushover Analysis for Seismic
Extension. Assessment and Design of Structures. Edinburgh: Heriot-
Watt University.
[14]. Giannopoulos, I. (2009). Seismic Assessment of an RC
Building According to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8. [28]. Wang, W. (n.d.). Seismic Fragility Analysis of RC Fame
University of Cambridge, UK. Structures with Different Retrofitting Methods.
[15]. Kumar, C. M. et al., (2014). Methodology for
Probabilistic Seismic Risk Evaluation of Building
Structure Based on Pushover Analysis. Open Journal of
Architectural Design, 2(2). 13-20.
doi:10.12966/ojad.08.01.2014.
[16]. Leslie, R. (2013). The Pushover Analysis explained in its
Simplicity. Civil Engineering and Construction Review.
25. 120-128.
[17]. Lo, D. and Oreta, A. (2013). Seismic Risk Mapping at
Micro-scale: The Case of Barangay Carmen, Cagayan de
Oro City, Philippines. Xavier University - Ateneo de
Cagayan.
[18]. Lupoi, G. et al. (2006). Seismic Fragility Analysis of
Structural Systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics.
doi: 10.1061/_ASCE_0733-9399_2006_132:4_385_.
[19]. Nassirpour, A. (2018). Walk-through the Road of Seismic
Performance Assessment. Manila: PRISMH.
[20]. NSO (2016). Population of Region X - Northern
Mindanao (Based on the 2015 Census of Population).
Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/content/population-
region-x-northern-mindanao-based-2015-census-
population.
[21]. Panyakapo, P. (2008). Seismic Capacity Diagram for
Damage Based Design. The 14th World Conference on
Earthquake Engineering: Thailand.
[22]. PDR-SEA (2012). Is the Pacific Ring of Fire raging?.
Retrieved from http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1022875.
[23]. PHIVOLCS (n.d.). Introduction to Earthquake. Retrieved
from
https://www.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/index.php/earthquake/i
ntroduction-to-earthquake.
[24]. PSA (n.d.). Construction activities rise 12% in 2016.
Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com/business/2017/
09/02/1735179/construction-activities-rise-12-2016.
[25]. Rota, M., Penna A, and Magenes G. (2008). A Procedure
For Deriving Analytical Fragility Curves for Buildings.
Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Pavia,
Italy. Retrieved from: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/
article/14_09-01-0149.PDF.
IREB CERTIFICATE