Dockside Container Crane Workshop Structural

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 30
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses how quay crane productivity and vessel turnaround times have improved over time, from the first containerships in the 1950s to modern ships today. It analyzes factors like lifts per hour, vessel size, and the relationship between turnaround time and productivity. It also outlines various incremental and quantum concepts for further reducing crane cycle times.

In the 1950s, the first containerships could do 12-15 lifts per hour and took 3-4 days in port. By the 1960s, post-panamax ships could do 25-35 lifts per hour and took 2-3 days. Modern ships today have even higher productivity. The text analyzes how factors like lifts per hour and vessel size impact turnaround time.

Some incremental improvements discussed that can reduce cycle time by up to 25% include using curvilinear cranes for faster motions, automation, elevating girder cranes (which were 5-25% faster for the Virginia Port Authority), and using tandem forties configurations.

Quay Crane Productivity

Michael A. Jordan
Structural Engineer
Liftech Consultants Inc.
Topics
Quay crane demand
Vessel turnaround time
Look at cycle time segments
Reducing cycle time
Incremental: Up to 25%
Quantum: Over 25%

See the printed paper for details.

2
The First Ship and Crane
1958 Matson Navigation
A good start
First new Panamax
containership
24 foot box
12 to 15 lifts an hour
3 or 4 days in port

3
Today’s Ship
Post-Panamax
20/40/45 Box
25 to 35 lifts per
hour
2 to 3 days in port

4
Tomorrow’s Crane Today
Plan Ahead
How many lifts per
hour?
30, 40, 50, 60, 70
What will the vessel
turnaround time
be?

5
Vessel Turnaround Time vs. Lifts per Hour
Vessel Size 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
TEU
Cranes 4 5 6 6
Lifts per Hour Vessel Turnaround Time, Hours

20 96 103 107 129


30 64 69 71 86
40 48 51 54 64
50 39 41 43 51
60 32 34 36 43
Parameters: 1.75 TEU per lift. Turnover 75%.
Two eight hour shifts/day.

6
CraneSim
Calculates
lifts per
hour
Actual 65%
to 80% of
calculated
lifts per
hour

7
Think Seconds per Lift

Frequency vs. Period

Frequency: Lifts/hour 30 45 60 75 90
Period: Seconds/lift 120 80 60 48 40

8
Typical Time Segments: Half-Cycle

9
Incremental Improvements (< 25%)
Curvilinear Cranes

Faster motions
Automation
Elevating girder
Tandem forties

10
Elevating Girder Crane
Virginia Port Authority

5 to 25 % faster

11
Tandem Forties
Maersk Bromma

12
Quantum Improvements (> 25%)
Dual hoist
BufferStation©
Ship-in-a-Slip
Shuttle type
Supertainer©
Conveyor type
Carrier crane
Technotainer
SuperCrane
Linear crane

13
Dual Hoist

VPA

1980s

50% faster

14
Dual Hoist

HHLA

2000s

15
Paceco Bufferstation©

Like a second
hoist but
moveable

16
Paceco Bufferstation©

17
Ship-in-a-Slip
Ceres, Amsterdam

80 – 100% faster

18
FloatTerm

Quay, ship,
“quay”

19
FloatTerm

Quay, ship,
barge

20
Paceco Supertainer©

21
CreaTech Technotainer©

Boom section

22
Delft University Carrier Crane

23
Liftech SuperCrane©

24
Rotating Trolley

25
Light Weight Shuttle

26
Boom Section

Rotate trolley

Spreader

Container

Shuttle

Operator’s cab

27
Revolutionary Systems—All Costly
New concepts for
gates yards and
cranes
Octopus
Automated
warehouses
Fully automated
system Port of Singapore, Fully Automated

28
29
Copyright 2001 by Liftech Consultants Inc. All rights reserved.
This material may not be duplicated without the written consent of Liftech Consultants Inc., except in the form
of excerpts or quotations for the purposes of review.

The information included in this presentation may not be altered, copied, or used for any other project without
written authorization from Liftech Consultants Inc. Anyone making use of the information assumes all liability
g from such use.
arising

You might also like