Synthesis and Characterization of A Red Mud and Rice Husk Based Geopolymer For Engineering Applications
Synthesis and Characterization of A Red Mud and Rice Husk Based Geopolymer For Engineering Applications
201600090 | 1 of 11
Summary: Red mud (RM) is the major waste material of the alkaline extraction of
alumina from bauxite. It occupies precious land and threatens the environment. Rice
is composed by approximately 20% of rice husk (RH) creating disposal and pollution
problems. After burning RH, the resulting rice husk ash RHA contains about 90%
silica. Synthesis of geopolymers is an emerging technology for the utilization of
industrial by-products. For the synthesis of a RM/RHA based geopolymer, we used
RM from a local Alumina Plant, RH from a local mill in Guinea and NaOH solutions.
The synthesis consisted of mixing the RHA to RM powders at a pre-designed weight
ratio. The NaOH solution was added with a given concentration. The effect of mix
ratio, alkalinity and curing age on the geopolymer specimen were investigated. X-ray
Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and compression test were
used to study the microstructure of RM, RHA and RHA/RM. The analyses showed that
the final product is mainly composed of amorphous geopolymer binder and that the
compressive strength ranges from 3 to 20 MPa.
conditions, variety of rice, and the quantity Bayer process. It contains considerable
of fertilizer used.[4] amount of alumina, caustic soda (even with
The present work is aimed at assessing high water content, owing to the presence
RM as raw material combined with RHA of an excessive amount of dissolved sodium
for the synthesis of inorganic polymeric hydroxide used to extract silicates and
compounds for engineering applications. alumina), ferric oxide causing the red color
of the mud, titania and other minor
valuable constituents.[6] It is one of the
Background oldest large-scale industries in the world. It
is characterized by strong alkalinity. Dis-
Red Mud posal becomes a huge problem due to the
Guinea has the world’s largest bauxite presence of high pH, heavy metals and
deposits (about 1/3 of the world’s total) and radioactivity. Therefore, new technologies
is the second leading bauxite producer after utilizing red mud as a raw material for
Australia. Mining accounts for 90% of the manufacturing high added-value products
country’s exports; likewise, bauxite are urgently needed.
accounts for 90% of all mining. Guinea At present, about 6 107t of red mud is
also has the only refinery in West Africa discharged to the environment every year
which converts bauxite into alumina, which all over the world.[7] A mass of RM not only
is then exported elsewhere for smelting. occupies precious land, but also threatens
Plans are underway for a new refinery and the environment because of basifying land
Guinea’s first smelter, giving Guinea the and polluting underground water. So,
potential pieces of a vertically integrated treating and disposal of RM has attracted
aluminum industry. Bauxite mining in much attention. In the Bayer process for
Guinea takes place through three compa- alumina production, 5 tons of bauxite are
nies: Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee washed and treated to produce 2 tons of
(CBG), Alumina Company of Guinea aluminum metal.[8] Red mud could cause
(ACG, formerly Friguia) and Societe des serious environmental problems: (i) con-
Bauxites de Kindia (SBK). tamination of surface and underground
The process patented by Bayer in 1892 water resources with NaOH and metallic
was a breakthrough in mineral processing oxide-bearing impurities[9]; (ii) direct con-
that enabled alumina to be extracted from tact with fauna and flora; (iii) evaporation
bauxite ore economically on a large scale. that could originate highly alkaline rain-
The question of what to do with bauxite falls[10]; (iv) visual impact on extensive
residue initially arose with the develop- areas. Some accidents, the most recent one
ment of the Bayer process for alumina in Ajka (Hungary) provoked irrecoverable
refining and the recognition that it gener- damages to the environment.[11]
ated a large amount of waste material. In the subsequent 120 years the ap-
Bayer himself noted that an inevitable proach has changed from one of uncon-
consequence of his process was the pro- strained disposal to that of containment in
duction of significant quantities of residue engineered storages, with a wide range of
that he recognized as a possible source of industry practice. Many recent studies and
iron: “The red, iron-containing residue that semi-industrial trials were directed to the
occurs after digestion settles well and, with incorporation of the red mud in construc-
sufficient practice, can be filtered and tion materials; traditional ceramics clinker;
washed. Due its high iron and low alumi- light weight aggregates.[12–14]
num oxide content, it can be, in an
appropriate manner, treated or with other Rice Husk
iron ores be smelted to iron.”[5] RM is the Assessment of Guinea’s food balance sheet
major waste material of the alkaline shows rice as the major food produced in
extraction of alumina from bauxite by the country, accounting for 61% to 69% of
Scheme 1.
General mechanism for geopolymer formation.[21]
is the dissolution of silica and alumina in an empirical formula for geopolymer matrix:
alkaline environment, followed by re-
M þ nfðSiO2 Þz AlO2 gn
precipitation to form an amorphous solid
polymer. The overall reactions are repre- Where Mþ represents an alkali cathion
sented below (Scheme 1).[21] (K , Naþ) for balancing the negative
þ
Scheme 2.
Types of polysialates.[26]
Figure 4. Figure 5.
XRD diagram of red mud. X-ray diagram of RHA (C ¼ cristobalite; Q ¼ quartz).
Figure 6.
EDX pattern of RM.
amorphous phases in raw materials con- iron silicon oxide (36 -2u angle). Amor-
tribute in geopolymerization reaction. phous phase in the microstructure of RHA/
Among the three raw materials, the red RM geopolymer has also been observed.
mud provides NaOH, Al2O3, and NaAlO2; Two peaks of gibbsite and iron oxide at
rice husk ash provides amorphous Si02; 18 -2u and 20 -2u, respectively are typically
sodium hydroxide solution provides associated with red mud raw material
NaOH. (Figure 4) disappeared in the XRD spec-
trum because there was reaction of geo-
polymerization among reactants resulting
XRD Analysis to an increase of compressive strength of
The XRD diagram (Figure 8) shows that end products.
the product is not clean geopolymer
matrix, but a composite consisting of the
geopolymer structure and crystalline SEM Observation
phases from parent materials.[27] It is The SEM of the investigated samples
certainly a composite containing two solid shows that the microstructure of RHA
parts, explicitly the non-dissolved solid and RM geopolymer comprises non-dis-
particles and the formed geopolymeric solved particles of RM, which are bonded
binder. The XRD patterns show a broad in an extent gel phase and the formation of
reflection related to the high amorphous gel silicate (Figure 9). The reaction with the
content. However, the center of this alkaline solution to form a particulate gel
reflection is shifted to 2u ¼ 29 due to network took place at the border of
changes in composition and structure particles then involving the entire surface.
when RHA is activated by NaOH and Several studies claim that the solid to liquid
NaSiO2 solutions. (S/L) ratio and the sodium hydroxide and
The main compositions in the crystalline silicon concentrations in the aqueous phase
structure are silicon oxide, cristobalite (at are the main synthesis parameters affecting
22 -2u angle) and some minerals such as the physical and mechanical properties of
sodium aluminum silicate (at 21.5 -2u), geopolymers.[28,29]
Figure 7. Figure 8.
RM/RHA5 specimen. XRD pattern of RHA/RM 5.
Figure 10.
Effect of the mix ratio on the compressive strength of
RHA/RM geopolymer.
Conclusion
[9] S. K. Tamotia, In: Proceedings of the International [20] J. Davidovits, J. Thermal Analysis 1991, 37, 1633.
Symposium on Processing of Fines, Jamshedpur, 2000, [21] M. L. Granizo, S. Alonso, M. T. Blanco-Varela,
Vol. 2, 430–434. A. Palomo, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 225.
[10] P. Renforth, W. M. Mayes, A. P. Jarvis, I. T. Burke, [22] D. Khale, R. Chaudhary, J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42,
D. A. C. Manning, K. Gruiz, Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 729.
421–422, 253. [23] H. Xu, S. J Deventer, Int. J. Mineral Process. 2000,
[11] S. Amritphale, M. Patel, Silicic. Ind. 1987, 2, 31. 59, 247.
[12] L. Senff, A. Castela, W. Hajjaji, D. Hotza. [24] Y. Shinohara, N. Kohyama, Industrial Health 2004,
J. A. Labrincha, Construct. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3410. 42, 277.
[13] J. S. Oh, P. K. Chang, Y. M. Lim, J. Korea Solid Wastes [25] D. R. Kumar, A. Kumar, K. N. Rai, Ceramica 2008,
Eng. Soc. 1998, 15, 16. 54, 203.
[14] A. K. Jain, S. K. Sharma, D. Singh, In: Proceedings of [26] G. Zhang, J. He, R. P. Gambrell, J. Transportation
the 31th Intersociety of Energy Conversion Engineering Res. Board 2010, 2167, 1.
Conference, Washington, 1996, Vol. 4, 2274–2279. [27] I. Giannopoulos, D. Panias, In: Proceedings of the
[15] K. M. Lin, Master Thesis, National Chung-Hsing Third International Conference on Deformation Process-
University, 1975. ing and Structure of Materials, Belgrade, 2007.
[16] D. S. Chaudhary, M. C. Jollands, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. [28] S. Traore, S. Diakite, D. L. Traore, Int. J. Mater Eng.
2004, 93, 1. 2014, 4, 25.
[17] L. F. Edson, G. Ederson, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2006, [29] J. He, Y. Jie, J. Zhang, Y. Yu, G. Zhang, Cement
9, 206. Concrete Comp. 2013, 37, 108.
[18] D. Khale, R. Chaudhary, J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 729. [30] P. Chindaprasirt, C. Jaturapitakkul, W. Chalee,
[19] J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applica- U. Rattanasak, Waste Management 2009, 29, 539.
tions, 3rd edition, Institut Geopolymere, Saint- [31] K. Somna, C. Jaturapitakkul, P. Kajitvichyanukul,
Quentin, 2011, p. 4–6. P. Chindaprasirt, Fuel 2011, 90, 2118.