Vibration Analysis Lectures
Vibration Analysis Lectures
Vibration Analysis Lectures
Lecture 2
Basic Vibratory Phenomena
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
WHAT IS A DOF ?
1 DOF
6 DOFs
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
m&x&
DISPLACEMENT
x(t) = C sin (ωnt + φ )
VELOCITY
x&(t) = Cωn cos (ωnt + φ )
ACCELERATION
&x&(t) = −Cωn 2 sin (ωnt + φ )
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
SPRINGS - I
FORCE F F=kx
F=kx0
Strain energy=1/2
kx02
x0
DISPLACEMENT x
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
SPRINGS - II
• A spring
• A float mechanism
• Beam flexibility
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
STIFFNESS FORMULAE
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
POSITION OF EQUILIBRIUM - I
POSITION OF EQUILIBRIUM - II
Weight mg
Static deflection: δ = =
stiffnes k
If the vibration amplitudeis x, total deflection will be :
mg
y = x +δ = x +
k
Newton's second law : m&x& = ∑ F
mg
m&x& = mg − ky = mg − k ( x + )
k
m&x& = −kx
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
TORSIONAL SYSTEM
kT θ I=0.16 kgm2
Torque T
Torsional stiffness = kT = =
Ang disp θ
D=10 mm
T Gθ πr 4
L= 300 mm Also = where J =
J L 2
G= 80 GPa Combining : kT = GJ / L = 261Nm / rad
kT 261
Iθ&& + kTθ = 0 ωn =
I
=
0.16
= 40.4 rad / s
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 2
KE = mv
2
1 2
SE = kx
2
v
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 1 2
m( x0ωn) = kx0 Hence:ωn = k
2
2 2 m
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
d ∂T ∂T ∂V ∂D
− + + = Qi
dt ∂x&i ∂xi ∂xi ∂x&i
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Linear System
Inertia Force proportional to accln
Damping force proportional to vel
Stiffness force proportional to displ
Torsional Vibration
Bending Vibration
Exponential term
− ζωnt
e
Oscillatory term
C sin(ωdt + φ )
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
CASE 2
EFFECT OF OVERDAMPING
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
CASE 3
x(t)
1.0 s 2.5 s 4.0s
4000 kg
t
Find k and c.
Initial conditions :
x& ( 0 ) = 0
T=2π/ωd=3
x (1 ) = 0 , x ( 2 . 5 ) = 0
s
x(4) = 0
ωd= 2π/3
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
LOGARITHMIC DECREMENT - I
x(tm) − ζωn(tm − tm + 1)
=e
x(tm + 1) AMP
2π
2π ζωn
ζωn 1 − ζ 2 ωn
ζωnT ωd = e
=e =e
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
LOGARITHMIC DECREMENT - II
2π
ζ
x(tm) 1−ζ 2
=e
x(tm + 1)
Taking logarithms of both sides :
x(tm) 2πζ
δ = ln = ≈ 2πζ
x(tm + 1) 1−ζ 2
If the two amplitudes are separated by (N - 1) cycles :
1 x(tm)
δ = ln
N x(tm + N)
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
AT RESONANCE
ζ =η / 2 = δ / 2π
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
weight mg 20 x9.81
d1 = = = = 0.0196m
stiffness k 10 x1000
d2
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
0
d ∂T ∂T ∂V ∂D
− + + = Qi
dt ∂x&i ∂xi ∂xi ∂x&i
T : Kinetic energy x is some general arbitrary co-
ordinate.
V : Potential & spring energy
D : Damping dissipation function
Q : External force
i : Co - ordinate number (i = 1 for SDOFsystems)
Free - vibration : Q = 0 SDOF d ∂T ∂V
No damping : D = 0 + =0
dt ∂x& ∂x
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 2 ∂T d ∂T d
T = mx& → = mx& → = (mx& ) = m&x&
2 ∂x& dt ∂x& dt
1 2 ∂V
V = kx → = kx
2 ∂x
d ∂T ∂V
+ = 0 → m&x& + kx = 0
dt ∂x& ∂x
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1 &2
T = Iθ
a 2
D=0
V = ∆SE + ∆PE where ∆ : Change
L
SE : Spring energy, PE : potential energy
θ
1 2
m SE = ky where y = aθ
mgLcosθ 2
mg PE = mgL(1 − cosθ )
L 1
V = k (aθ ) 2 + mgL(1 − cosθ )
2
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
OBTAIN DERIVATIVES
1 &2
T = Iθ
2
∂T d ∂T d &
→ & = Iθ → & = ( Iθ ) = Iθ&&
&
∂θ dt ∂θ dt
1
V = k (aθ ) 2 + mgL(1 − cosθ )
2
∂V
→ = ka θ + mgL sin θ ≈ (ka + mgL)θ
2 2
∂θ
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
d ∂T ∂V
+ = 0
dt ∂θ&i ∂θ i
&&
Iθ + (ka + mgL)θ = 0
2
(ka + mgL)
2
ωn =
I
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
FORCED VIBRATION
Solution : x(t) = CF + PI
xCF(t) xPI(t) Steady-state
Transient
Periodic solution
x(t)=xCF(t)+ xPI(t)
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
PROPERTIES OF THE PI
PHASE LAG
φ
100 100
F (t ) = F0 sin ωt
50 50
0 0
x(t ) = x0 sin(ωt − φ )
-50 -50
Tim
-100 -100
0 0.1 e 0.2 0.3
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
The solution for the steady − state vibration can be found by inserting
the PI xPI (t ) = x0 sin(ωt − φ ) into the EOM m&x& + cx& + kx = F0 sin ωt
F0 cω
x0 = & tan φ =
(k − mω 2 ) 2 + (cω ) 2 k − mω 2
ω c
Let r = and ζ =
ωn 2 km
x0 1 2ζr
= & tan φ =
F0 k (1 − r 2 ) 2 + (2ζr ) 2 1− r 2
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
FRF PLOT
φ=900 at resonance
I
RESONANCE
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
EFFECTS OF DAMPING
Reduces
response at
resonance.
Has relatively
little effect on
resonant
frequency.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Q-FACTOR
Resonant amplitude x0
Q= =
Static deflection d r = 1
F0 F0
We have : x0 = & d=
k (1 − r 2 ) 2 + (2ζr ) 2 k
x0 x0 1
Q= = =
d r =1 F0 (1 − r 2 ) 2 + (2ζr ) 2
k r =1 r =1
x 1
→Q = 0 = Inverse of Damping Ratio x 2
d r =1 2ζ
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
HALF-POWER POINTS
Half-power points
X0 /d
Frequencies corresponding to
Q
Q
amplitude =
2
Q/1.414
are called half − power points.
1.0
ω
r =1
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
H Hres x0 1
Hres H = =
H (ω1) = H (ω 2) = F ( k − mω 2 2
) + ( cω ) 2
2 0
1
ω1 Hres = at ω = ωn = k / m
ω cωn
n
ω2 Determine ω such that H (ω ) = Hres
2
ω
1 1 ω 2
→ = → Yields a quadratic equation in ( )
(k − mω ) + (cω )
2 2 2
2cωn ωn
Hres
There are 2 frequencies ω 1 &ω 2 such that H (ω 1) = H (ω 2) =
2
ω 2 − ω1 c 1
It can be shown that ≈ = 2ζ =
ωn km Q
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
50
F 0 sinωt F0 ωt
-50
x = x0 sin(ωt − φ )
π
x& = ωx0 cos(ωt − φ ) = x0ω sin(ωt − φ + )
2
π
ie x& leads x by
2
&x& = −ω 2 x0 sin(ωt − φ ) = −ω 2 x = ω 2 x0 sin(ωt − φ + π )
π
ie &x& leads x& by , and x by π . &x&
2
x&
x ωt-φ
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
3 CASES TO CONSIDER
mω2 x0
cωx0 ω < ω n -> Kx0 > mω2x0
F0 kx0
Stiffness control
mω 2 x0
cωx0 ω= ω n -> Kx0 = mω2x0
kx0
F0 Damping control
mω2 x0
cωx0 ω> ω n -> Kx0 < mω2x0
kx0
F0 Inertia control
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
VIBRATION ISOLATION
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
CAR ENGINE
UNDAMPED
SPRING MOUNT
DAMPED SPRING
MOUNT
PNEUMATIC
RUBBER MOUNT
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
MOUNTS
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
BASIC THEORY
Source of
FT sin(ωt+θ) vibration
mω x02
From the phasor diagram :
cωx0F = x0 k 2 + (cω ) 2
φ FT T
FT k 2 + (cω ) 2
T= =
F0 (k − mω 2 ) 2 + (cω ) 2
VARIATION OF F0 WITH ω
ω<ω mω 2
x0 ω=ωn mω 2 x0
n
FT cωx0 FT cωx0
F0
F0
kx0 kx0
ω>ωn
mω2 x0 ω >> ω n mω2 x0
cωx0
FT cωx0
F0 FT
kx0 F0
kx0
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
TRANSMISSIBILTY FT/F0
DECREASING
T
LESS ISOLATION WITH INCREASING DAMPING
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
RUBBER
PADS
Before isolation
After isolation
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Lecture –3
• Two complications
– Each node has 6 degrees of freedom
– Many such nodes are needed to describe the geometry of
representative engineering systems.
2-DOF SYSTEMS
SDOF
SYSTEM
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
REFERENC
E
k2 force k2 force
DEFLECTED
k1 force
k1x1
k2(x1-x2) k2(x1-x2)
m1 m2
x x2
1
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
x1 x2
We have : m1&x&1 + (k 1 + k 2) x1 − k 2 x 2 = 0
m 2 &x&2 − k 2 x1 + k 2 x 2 = 0
Remembering that &x&1 = −ω 2 x1 & &x&2 = −ω 2 x 2
− m1ω 2 x1 + (k 1 + k 2 )x1 − k 2 x 2 = 0
-m 2ω 2 x 2 − k 2 x1 + k 2 x 2 = 0
m1 0 x1 k 1 + k 2 − k 2 x1 0
−ω 2
+ =
0 m 2 x 2 − k 2 k 2 x 2 0
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
STEP 4: CONTINUED
k 1 + k 2 − k 2 m1 0
− k2 x1
k 2 0 m2
x2
STIFFNESS MASS MODE SHAPE
MATRIX MATRIX VECTOR
k 1 + k 2 − k 2 m1 0
− k2 k 0 m2
2
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
→ (k 1 + k 2 − ω 2 m1)(k 2 − ω 2 m 2) − k22 = 0
Quadratic in ω2 → 2 natural frequencies : ωn1 & ωn2. (ωn1 ≤ ωn2)
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
x2 k 1 + k 2 − m1ω n21
Hence : =
x1 ω =ωn1 k2
x2 k 1 + k 2 − m1ω 2
Similarly, for the 2nd mode : = n2
x1 ω =ωn 2 k2
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
MODE 1 MODE 2
Ignore damping.
Matrix equation of motion :
[M] NxN {&x&}Nx1 + [K] Nx1{x}Nx1 = { 0 }Nx1
{x} = −ω 2{X} gives :
([K] − ω 2 M ]) Nx1{x}Nx1 = { 0 }Nx1
Eigenvalue problem in ω 2 and {x}
N modes → (ω 2 ) Natural frequency
{x} Mode shape
3 DOF SYSTEM
TIME FREQUENCY
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
MODAL SUPERPOSITION
MODE 1 MODE 3
MODE 2
TIME DOMAIN
= + +
FREQUENCY DOMAIN
= + +
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Torsional System
One of the earliest fatigue failures experienced
is that of the propeller shaft of a steam engine
driven naval ship during the I world war. It was
reported that the propeller shaft (which has the
lowest torsional stiffness in the system because
of its length) upon its failure was stiffened by
increasing its diameter, however, it failed
earlier. Then it was identified that the excitation
became closer to the new natural frequency
causing fatigue failure in lesser time. From then
onwards, torsional analysis became mandatory
for all reciprocating installations.
• Briefly, we will talk about simple modeling adopted for torsional analysis of a reciprocating diesel engine
driving a generator.
• All the 8 cylinders are considered as discs, whose rotational mass moments of inertia can be determined
and connected by equivalent torsional stiffnesses of the crank shaft.
• The damper connected to cylinder 8 is divided into two separate disks.
• The coupling stiffness is usually the lowest when compared to the stiffness of any of the shaft sections in
the train.
• The generator is modeled as one rotor
• A model thus derived (the details to arrive these values is out of current scope) is given in the next slide.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Bending Vibration
FORCED RESPONSE
Orthogonality Conditions
them.
• Let us take two different modes, say rth and
{u } [M ]{u }= m r = s
s T r
r
{u } [K ]{u }= 0 r ≠ s
sth modes. When they are multiplied with
mass matrix or stiffness matrix, the result is s T r
zero. This multiplication is orthogonalization
as written in a compact matrix form here.
• Generalized Mass – However, if we choose
{u } [M ]{u }= k r = s
s T r
{u~ }= {u }
• Remember, the mode shapes are T
proportional, therefore the generalized mass r 1 r
and stiffness depend upon the original shapes
that you choose – a unique way of choosing mr
the shapes is such that the generalized mass is
one unit and the stiffness is p2. They are then
called orthogonolized mode shapes.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Modal Analysis
Proportional Damping
[C ] = α [M ] + β [K ]
• Damping matrix does not obey the
[I ]{η&&}+ [U~ ] (α [M ] + β [K ])[U~ ]{η&}+ [p 2 ]{η } = 0
T
orthogonality properties stated earlier, hence, the
concept of a proportional damping is evolved,
wherein, the damping matrix is taken to be the
[I ]{η&&}+ (α [I ] + β [p 2 ]){η&}+ [p 2 ]{η } = 0
sum of a mass matrix and stiffness matrix with
appropriate proportionality constants, a and b. 2ξ r pr = α + β pr2
• If we know a and b we can find the
viscous damping ratio in the corresponding α β pr
ξr = +
mode and thus use experimental value to 2 pr 2
write damped modal equations.
• General finite element codes such as η&&r + 2ξ r prη&r + pr2η r = 0 r = 1,2, K
ANSYS, NASTRAN … adopt beta
damping in place of viscous damping..
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Modal Analysis
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Modal Analysis
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Modal Analysis
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
VIBRATION ABSORBER
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
LECTURE 4
RAYLEIGH’s Method
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Example………..RAYLEIGH’s Method
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
undetermined
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
GALERKIN Method
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Lecture 5
Stability Considerations
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
STABILITY
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Lecture 6
Reference Systems
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Example
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Example
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Reduced Equation
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Lecture 7
Rotor Dynamics
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Rotor Dynamics
ω 2δ eccentricity
y=
Fg
−ω2
stiffness W
• When the denominator is zero, the whirl radius is
infinity, defining the critical speed.
• Laval proved that one can cross the critical speed
and is stable at high speeds as y approaches -d
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
d2 dz
M 2 ( z + a cos ω t ) + C + Kz = 0
dt dt
d2 dy
M 2 ( z + a sin ω t ) + C + Ky = 0
dt dt
r = z + iy
d 2r dr
M 2 +C + Kr = Maω 2 e iω t
dt dt
O is the bearing center line, E is the disk geometric • Solution for the amplitude R of r, in
center, G is the mass center, EG=a is the eccentricity, terms of a and W = w/p
OE=R is the whirl radius about the bearing center line.
Disk rotates/spins about E with angular velocity w ccw
R Ω2
direction and the whirl is assumed synchronous with R= =
spin. The whirl is lagging in phase by an angle f from
the unbalance force vector in direction of EG.
a (1 − Ω ) + (2ξ Ω )
2 2 2
d 2r dr
M 2 + C + Kr = Maω 2 e iωt + Kre i ( ax + a0 )
dt dt
R
R=
a
Ω2 R0 e ia0
= e i (ω t −φ )
+ e i (ω t −φb )
(1 − Ω ) + (2ξ Ω)
2 2 2
(1 − Ω ) + (2ξ Ω)
2 2 2
r0
R0 = bow factor
a
[ ]
R = Ae − iφ + Be − i (φ + a0 ) eiω t a0 = 00
Ω 2 + R0
= [A + Be ]e (
R
)
− ia0 i ω t −ψ R= =
a (1 − Ω ) + (2ξ Ω )
2 2 2
Ω 2 a0 = 180 0
A= Ω 2 − R0
(1 − Ω ) + (2ξ Ω)
R
2 2 2 R= =
a (1 − Ω ) + (2ξ Ω )
2 2 2
R0 Ω s = R0
B=
(1 − Ω ) + (2ξ Ω)
2 2 2
•A is response due to conventional unbalance and
B due to the bow unbalance.
•Usually, the bow gives a0 = 0, then these two
A sin φ + B sin φb responses get added, i.e., the unbalance increases.
ψ = tan −1
•For a dropped rotor the bow usually is a0 = 180,
A cos φ + B cos φb then these two responses oppose.
•The above condition leads to a self balancing
speed, Ws, speed at which the response becomes
zero.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
.contd..
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
GRAVITATIONAL Effect
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
OIL WHIRL
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
ROUTH-HURWITZ CRITERION
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
GYROSCOPIC EFFECTS
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Dynamic Unbalance
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Distributed Unbalance
Influence Coefficients
Example
Run 1 : No Trial Mass
Left Plane L :
9.144 microns at 90o L1 = 9.144i
Right Plane R :
10.16 microns at 45o R1 = 7.188 + 7.188i
Left Plane L :
5.08 microns at 27 o L 2 = 4.521 + 2.311i
Right Plane R :
6.35 microns at 99 o R 2 = −0.9906 + 8.274i
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Example – contd.
R 2 − R1
a bR =
TR
L 2 − L1
a aR =
TR
•Influence coefficient denoting the
response in plane a due to a unit force in
plane R
=
(4.521 + 2.311i ) − (9.144i )
6.294 + 2.608i
= 0.229 + 1.181i
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Example – contd.
Example – contd.
mL =
•When these correction masses are added, (we may a bR a aL − a aR a bL
have to do this in two masses each by placing them
in the nearest locations) the response theoretically
should be zero. This does not happen as there are
m R = 10.94 + 1.56i
several assumptions made in this analysis, the first
correction should bring the responses to be low, one m L = −2.81 − 1.9i
or two additional balancing runs may be needed to
achieve the desired grade quality.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Influence Coefficients
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Balancing Masses
Classification of Rotors
•Class 1 – Rigid Rotors: Rotors that can be corrected in any two arbitrary planes and after
correction, its unbalance does not significantly change at any speed upto the maximum
operating speed and when running under conditions which approximate closely to the final
supporting system. Rotors which do not satisfy this condition are classified as flexible rotors.
•Class 2 – Quasi Flexible Rotors: Rotors that cannot be considered rigid but can be balanced
adequately in a low speed balancing machine. These are rotors, (1) where the axial distribution
of unbalance is known – e.g., 2A – shaft with a grinding wheel; 2B – Shaft with a grinding wheel
and pulley; 2C – Jet engine compressor rotor; 2D – Printing roller; 2E – rotors with a long rigid
mass supported by a flexible shaft, whose unbalance can be neglected, such as computer
memory drum; (2) where axial distribution is not known – e.g., 2F – Symmetrical rotors with two
end correction planes, whose maximum speed does not significantly approach II critical speed
and whose service speed does not contain I critical speed and with controlled initial unbalance;
2G – same as 2F but with an additional central correction plane and that it may have its service
speed in I critical speed range; 2H – Same as 2F rotors but unsymmetrical.
•Class 3 – Flexible Rotors: Rotors that cannot be balanced in a low speed balancing machine
and that require some special flexible rotor balancing technique – e.g., Generator rotors•
Class 4 – Flexible Attachment Rotors: Rotors that could fall in categories 1 or 2 but have in
addition one or two more components that are themselves flexible or flexibly attached – e.g., a
rotor with centrifugal switch
•Class 5 – Single Speed Flexible Rotors: Rotors that could fall into category 3, but for some
reason, e.g., economy, are balanced only for one speed of operation – e.g., high speed motor
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
L-8
Vibration Measurement
Pickups, Analyzers, Modulation,
Cepstrum Analysis,
Digital Measurement
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
AMPLITUDE
• Displacement, velocity
and acceleration for a
given frequency are all
related through
• V = Xp
• A = Vp = Xp2
Transducers Selection
Type of Measurement:
1) Contact (Seismic)
2) Non Non-Contact (Relative) Contact (Relative)
• Rugged Devices
• Operate in Wide Frequency Range (Near 0 to above 400 kHz)
• Good High Frequency Response
• Some Models Suitable For High Temperature
• Require Additional Electronics
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Sensor Relationships
Amplitude
(mils, in/sec, g’s)
Accelerometer Principle
Accelerometer Elements
∫ [(0.1sin )]
0.0775
=
1
0.0775
2
) (
81.1t + 0.0025 sin 2 173.52t dt
0
1 0.01 0.0025
= × 0.0775 + × 0.0775
0.0775 2 2
= 0.005 + 0.00125
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Fourier Analysis
3D View
Fourier Analysis
∞
1
f (t ) = a 0 + ∑ (a n cos nωt + bn sin ωt )
2 n =1
• Fourier analysis is a mathematical tool T
2
that helps us in identifying the frequency a n = ∫ F (t ) cos nω tdt
components of a periodic vibration signal T 0
which is composed of several harmonics. T
2
• The periodic signal is assumed to consist bn = ∫ F (t )sin nω tdt
of several harmonics of the fundamental T 0
frequency and an infinite series gives 1 ∞
accurate results. In practice, first few f (t ) = a 0 + ∑ An cos(nωt − φ n )
components are considered. The harmonic 2 n =1
T
• A finite time signal is considered in this Complex 1
− T
2
process. 1
T0
We will get back to this again
∫ {x(t )} dt
2
• Average power of the signal over a Pav =
T0 0
period of time, T0 is 2
∞ 2
a A
• Complex harmonic components directly = 0 +∑ n
2 n=1 2
represent the average power in the
= ∑ Cn
2
corresponding frequency term, this is
Parseval theorem.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
4t
x(t ) = 2 − 0 < t < T0
T0
4 2πt 1 4πt 1 6πt
= sin + sin + sin
π T0 2 T0 3 T0
4 2πkt
= sin k = 1,2,3,...
kπ T0
• We can increase the number of terms in the summation to get more accurate result.
• Sixty terms sum is given in the figure below.
• In practice, we are interested in the lower harmonics, or those harmonics which can be
excited to resonance from any per rev or nozzle excitations.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Rectangular Signal
• This and the next slide illustrate a rectangular periodic signal and its Fourier components.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
• 4-5 decades ago, a Fourier analysis was a tedious job, the signal is first recorded on a
recorder, e.g., a UV recorder, it was then enlarged and digitized manually to obtain the signal
as a function of time. A hand calculation or a main frame computer was then used to determine
the Fourier components in any diagnostics and trouble shooting exercise.
• Dedicated analog instruments are then developed using filter circuits, which are expensive –
the accuracy was limited octave bands, e.g., 11 filters are common with center frequencies
beginning from 31.5 and doubling consecutively.
• A vibration chart thus developed is called octave band analysis, which gave the relative
energy levels in these bands to make a diagnostics analysis.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Sequential analysis
One filter at a time
Analysis time
between each analysis
Significant transient
data may be lost
nω → ω
+∞
F (ω ) = (TC n )T →∞ = ∫ f (t )e −iω t dt
Forward Transform – Fourier Integral −∞
+∞
F (ω ) = Ff (t ) = ∫ f (t )e −iω t dt
−∞
+∞
1
f (t ) = F F (ω ) =
−1
∫ f (ω )e −iω t dω
•Inverse Transform – Conversion 2π −∞
from frequency to time domain
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
1
{F }N ×1 = [A]N × N {F }N ×1
N
Mean = 0
Mean square = 0.56
Root Mean Square = 0.75
Side bands in Frequency domain
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
ω rotational speed
Ω frequency of torsional oscillation
θ amplitude of torsional vibration
Instantaneous shaft position
φ = ω t + θ cosΩt
Angular velocity φ& = ω - θΩ sin Ωt
Angular speed range
ω min = ∞ − Ωθ to ω max = ∞ + Ωθ
ω − ω min
θ = max
2Ω
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
2π 2π
ω min = , ω max =
Tmax Tmin
ω max − ω min
θ=
2Ω
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Amplitude Spectrum
• Amplitude spectrum is given by the magnitude
and frequency of each harmonic component. F (ω )An , φ n
• Power spectrum is obtained by squaring each Discrete
amplitude and halving them and plotted in Power Spectrum
discrete form at each frequency.
• Auto spectrum is same as power spectrum when
1 2
An
the frequency domain is expressed continuously, 2
this is obtained by taking the product of F(w) Auto Spectrum
and its conjugate marked by * Continuous
• Auto or Power spectrum is a measure of power S ff (ω ) = F * (ω )F (ω )
associated with corresponding frequency
component and hence important for vibration Excitation f(t)
Cross spectra
engineers. Response x(t)
• Cross spectrum involves two different functions.
Let us take the excitation and response functions S fx (ω ) = F * (ω )X (ω )
and their cross spectra are defined by S xf (ω ) = X * (ω )F (ω )
• Cross spectra are used in defining coherence,
which is a degree of linear dependence between
two signals, see next slide.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Coherence
A/D Converter
Examples
Signal Sampling
• Signal sampling is an important
criterion while acquiring the data
1
Sampling rate f s =
∆t
• The same signal above shows
inadequate sampling rate, number of
points captured in a unit time is too
low and the original signal character
is lost.
1
f Nyq = fs
2
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Sampling Example
Multiplexer – De-multiplexer