Word Stress Article
Word Stress Article
Word Stress Article
NIM: 5180511030
Word stress
Abstract
This article review presents an overview of what word stress is and its importance in
intelligibility. As we know, word stress is very important in English language. So, this article
is contains small amount of information about word stress. How to understand native speaker
and of course increasing our knowledge.
Introduction
This literature review presents an overview of what word stress is its relationship with
intelligibility might encounter.
Main problem
Distinguish certain words and avoid any possible misunderstanding. Native speakers
of English use word stress naturally. Word stress is so natural for them that they don't even
know they use it. Foreigner or receiver find would difficult to understand native speakers,
especially those speaking fast. Faulty suprasegmental aspects of speech that can impact on
intelligibility. That’so why words stress gain important roles in English language as main
aspect of complete conversation.
Word stress
Word stress in English is quite variable: some words are stressed on their first syllable
(e.g., sis-ter, de-co-ra-te, A-ra-bic), some are stressed on the second (e.g., present, arcane,
America, attention), some on the third (e.g., de-co-ra-tion, his-to-ry-ici-ty, re-fe-ree), some
on the fourth (e.g., ex-as-pe-ra-tion), etc.
In principle, stress alone could serve to distinguish words, but in reality it seldom does.
Minimal pairs in English which are distinguished by word stress, such as ‘in-sig-ht/in-ci-te’,
are rare (Cutler, Dahan & van Donselaar, 1997). However, we know that faulty
suprasegmental aspects of speech can impact on intelligibility (Anderson-Hsieh, Johnson &
Koehler, 1992; Derwing, Munro, & Wiebe, 1998; Hahn, 2004; Kang, Rubin & Pickering,
2010) and that word stress constitutes a significant part of suprasegmental speech. There is
evidence to indicate that intelligibility and comprehensibility are undermined specifically by
faulty word stress (Cutler & Clifton, 1984; Gallego, 1990; Bond, 1999; Field 2005). Faulty
prosodic features including word stress may affect comprehension more adversely than
segmental errors (Anderson-Hsieh, Johnson, & Koehler, 1992; Bond, 1999). This
misunderstanding of word stress can have significant impact beyond the language. For
example, it has been found that word stress mispronunciation contributes to
misunderstandings between GPs and their patients in multicultural medical clinics (Roberts,
Moss, Wass, Sarangi & Jones, 2005).
Sometimes certain word with same spelling are pronounced with different word
stress, this way or option to distinguish that certain words, but in reality it seldom does.
Minimal pairs in English which are distinguished by word stress, such as ‘insight/incite’, are
rare (Cutler, Dahan & van Donselaar, 1997).
Noun Verb
OB-ject ob-JECT
TRANS-fer trans-FER
RE-cord re-CORD
CON-trast con-TRAST
In English, as we have seen, stress placement is not entirely random: nouns, for
instance, are typically stressed on the penult or the antepenult, depending on the weight of the
former. That is, there is a certain degree of phonological conditioning in stress placement. As
we’ll see, this is often overridden by morphological factors; for example, some suffixes, such
as -ic, attract the stress on the immediately preceding syllable, witness pairs such as hístory
— historic, photograph — photográphic, etc.).
Such suffixes are called pre-stressed — I guess the term is quite self-explanatory.
Finally, some suffixes are never stressed and they do not alter the stress of the stem, either;
examples include -ing, -ed, -ly, etc., e.g., decorate — decorating, decorated, colourful —
colourfully, etc. Such suffixes are referred to as stressneutral ones. Some suffixes attract
stress on themselves, such as -ee, cf. Re-fe-ree, absentee; such suffixes are known as self-
stressed. Some prefixes, then, may interfere with the stress of the stem.
The prefixes per-, o-, com, for example, are basically unstressable, so verbs like per-
mit, vo-mit, com-mít, etc., are stressed on the ult, even though, verbs with a light ult are
generally stressed on the penult, cf. the verbs límit, vomit, where li and vo, of course, are not
prefixes but part of the stem. To sum up, stress placement often happens according to
morphological conditioning, which often overrides phonological conditioning. Finally, some
items are stressed irregularly.
For example, the noun evént is stressed on the penult, although it contains no self-
stressed suffix; cháracter, on the other hand, is stressed on the antepenult, even though the
penult is heavy, and no morphological condition can account for why the antepenult is
stressed, either. In such cases, we talk about lexical conditioning — a tricky term used by
linguists to say that the word is simply irregular. (The term refers to the fact that stress
placement is determined by the individual lexical item — i.e., it doesn’t follow a general
pattern, but it’s irregular.)
A word normally stressed on the first syllable, unless there is reason to put stress
somewhere else. The reason is either suffixes or prefixes.
1. Suffixes
The word with suffix “-ion” start with letter i or u this will affect the position
of stressed word (exception: suffix -ist, -ism, -ize and ing)
e.g.: re-LA-tion, re-ve-LA-tion com-BUS-tion, ci-vi-li-ZA-tion, cap-pi-ta-li-
ZA-tion, com-pe-TI-tion.
2. Prefixes
Word beginning with: (a-, ab-, be-, con-, de-, dis-, e-, ex-, in-, im-, per-, pre-
and re-)
Most two-syllable verbs starting with prefix are almost stressed on the
second syllable
(Example: ad-DRESS, be-COME, com-PLETE, con-TRAST, dis-CUSS, ex-
PORT, im-PROVE, re-QUI-re, pre-FER, con-TEMPT)
Note: all three syllable verbs suffixes with “-ate” are stressed on the first syllable.
Three main rules have been discussed in the literature. The first of the three is
phonological similarity. This is when students use known stress patterns from other similar
words and transfer them to new words. For example, a student may know the word stress
pattern of ‘humanity’ and apply its word stress structure to a new vocabulary item such as
‘absurdity’.
It is particularly of note that late learners of English rely most on the stress patterns
of phonologically-similar known words (Guion, 2006). The placement of certain suffixes in
English can alter a stress pattern. For example, adding ‘-ian’ to a root word changes the stress
(consider LI-brary and Li-br-AR-ian), while other suffixes do not have this effect (evident in
‘FRIEND’ and ‘FRIENDship’ where both place stress on the same syllable 2006, for a full
review). It is suggested that this feature of stress patterns in English be explicitly taught and
practiced in the classroom (Ghorbany, 2011). The explicit teaching of suffix rules may assist
in accessing the students’ ability to learn stress through the use of phonological similarity.
Additionally, analogy exercises, where students group words with similar stress
patterns or find the odd one out (Field, 2005), again rely on phonological similarity. It has
been shown how early and late bilinguals both demonstrated ability for analogical extension
and learning simple patterns (Guion, 2004).
The second rule relates to word class. Just over 80% of two syllable nouns and
adjectives place stress on the first syllable, e.g., ‘KITCHen’ and ‘EXT-ra’ (Hammond,
1999). However, verb stress works in the opposite manner (consider ‘ach-IEVE’ and ‘ag-
REE’). The word class rules appear in many English teaching textbooks but there is little
evidence for the effectiveness or transfer of this rule.
Whatever rule is decided upon, they have one thing in common; all of these
explanations take time and need to be broken down to teachable concepts, if they can be at
all. Mastering a linguistic rule may happen but internalizing the stress patterns for specific
words is not the same (Field, 2005).
Word glossary
Special thanks: