Lotte Titan TE3 Geo RPT Rev 1

Geotechnical Interpretative Report
Soil Investigation for

TE-3 Project at Pasir Gudang
Document number: GLK-10-269-LCT-001

Project Name: TE-3 Project in Pasir Gudang
Project Nr Lotte Chemical Titan (M) Sdn Bhd
Project Nr GS Engineering & Construction
Document Type: Soil Report
Discipline Code: CX
Plant: Pasir Gudang, Johor, Malaysia
Security Classification: Restricted
The attached document, revised as indicated below is issued herewith.

Changes to the previous revision are indicated with a vertical line in the left margin.
Please destroy any previous issues.
Originator's Reviewed / Checked

Rev Date Document Status
Name & Initials Name & Initials
0 26/06/15 Preliminary Report Issued for Review Ruzani Law PC
1 10/7/15 Preliminary Report Issued for Review Ruzani Law PC
File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretative Report
GLK-10-269-LCT-001rev1
Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 2 of 43
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 6
1.1. Scope of Work ...................................................................................................... 6
1.2. Site Description .................................................................................................... 7
1.3. Information Provided ............................................................................................ 7
2. INTERPRETATION OF THE SOIL INVESTIGATION ........................................ 8
2.1. Site Investigation Scope of Works........................................................................ 8
2.2. Regional Geology ................................................................................................. 8
2.3. Subsurface Soil Profile ......................................................................................... 8
2.4. Ground Water Table ............................................................................................. 9
2.5. Geotechnical Design Parameters......................................................................... 9
2.6. Aggressiveness of Soil & Groundwater to Concrete & Steel ............................. 12
2.7. Critical Ground Condition ................................................................................... 12
3. SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ......................... 13
3.1. Tectonic and Seismicity ...................................................................................... 13
3.2. Liquefaction Potential Assessment ....................................................................13
4. TANK FOUNDATION ............................................................................ 16
4.1. Foundation Design Criteria ................................................................................. 16
4.2. Loading Condition of Tank Foundation .............................................................. 16
4.3. Bearing Capacity of Tank Foundation ................................................................ 17
4.4. Stability of Tank Foundation ............................................................................... 18
4.5. Settlement Criteria .............................................................................................. 19
4.6. Settlement of Tank Foundation .......................................................................... 20
4.7. Differential Settlement ........................................................................................ 21
4.8. Rate of Primary Consolidation ............................................................................ 22
4.9. Hydrostatic Testing ............................................................................................. 22
4.10. Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 23
5. SHALLOW FOUNDATION ...................................................................... 24
5.1. Bearing Capacity ................................................................................................ 24
5.2. Settlement .......................................................................................................... 25
5.3. Plate Load Test .................................................................................................. 26
5.4. Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 27
6. DEEP FOUNDATION............................................................................. 28
6.1. Jack-In Concrete Spun Pile ................................................................................ 28
6.2. Geotechnical Capacity ....................................................................................... 28
6.3. Lateral Capacity of Pre-Cast Concrete Spun Pile .............................................. 30
6.4. Settlement of Single Pile at Working Load ......................................................... 32
6.5. Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 34
7. DYNAMIC FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATION .............................. 35
7.1. Foundation Recommendations for Vibrating Equipment.................................... 35
7.2. Foundation Recommendations for Blast Resilient Building ............................... 36
8. EARTHWORK & SITE PREPARATION ..................................................... 37
8.1. Stripping of Top Soil ........................................................................................... 37

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 3 of 43
8.2. Excavation .......................................................................................................... 37

8.3. Dewatering ......................................................................................................... 38
8.4. Backfilling and Compaction ................................................................................ 38
8.5. Suitability of In-Situ Soil As Fill Material ............................................................. 40
8.6. Road Sub-grade, Sub-base and Base Course ................................................... 40
9. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION ...................................................... 41
10. REFERENCES ..................................................................................... 43
Figure
Figure 1 Site Location Plan
Figure 2 Site Layout Plan
Figure 3 Geological Map
Figure 4 Subsurface Soil Profiles
Figure 5 Details of Tank Foundation
Figure 6 Time Settlement Curve for Tank
Appendix
Appendix A Borehole Logs
Appendix B Summary of Laboratory test Results
Appendix C Electrical Resistivity Tests and Thermal Conductivity Tests
Appendix D Aggressiveness of Soil and Ground Water to Steel and Concrete
Appendix E Liquefaction Assessment
Appendix F Tank Stability and Settlement Analyses
Appendix G Shallow Foundation
Appendix H Piled Foundation

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 4 of 43
Abbreviations
LCTM Lotte Chemical Titan (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
GS E&C GS Engineering & Construction Corporation
Geolab Geolab Sdn Bhd
GLK GL Konsult Sdn Bhd
BH Borehole
CPT Cone Penetration Test
PLT Plate Load Test
TP Trial Pit
ERT Electrical Resistivity Test
RL Reduce Level
SPT N Standard Penetration Test Blow Count (blow/300mm penetration)
PGA Peak Ground Acceleration
bgl Below Ground Level
υ Poisson’s Ratio
γb Bulk Density of Soil
c’ Drained Cohesion of Soil
φ’ Friction Angle of Soil
OCR Over-Consolidation Ratio
Cv Coefficient of Consolidation
PI Plasticity Index
CRR Cyclic Resistance Ratio
CSR Cyclic Stress Ratio
amax Maximum Ground Surface Acceleration
g Acceleration Due to Gravity
σvo Total Vertical Overburden Stress
σ’vo Effective Vertical Overburden Stress
rd Stress Reduction Factor (Depth Dependent)
S Minimum Tank Shoulder Width From Annular Plate Edge
T Maximum Height of Tank Foundation
f Maximum Allowable Sag
D Diameter of Tank in meter
fo Initial Deflection of Centre of Tank Bottom in meter
qult Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Foundation
Sac Shape Factor
Es Young’s Modulus of Elasticity for Steel
Ks The yeild strength of the bottom plate
i ac Inclination Factor
B Width of Foundation
L Length of Foundation
H’ Horizontal Component of Resultant Load at the Base of Foundation
A Effective foundation area
qall Allowable Bearing Capacity of Foundation
pt Tank Pressure on Subgrade
Pt Tank Loading on Tank Pad
h Tank Pad Thickness
γ Tank Pad Unit Weight
α Angle of Load Spreading Through Fill
Si Immediate Settlement of Sand and Clay Layers
Sc Consolidation Settlement of Clay Layer
Ss Secondary Settlement
S Settlement of Sand Layers
q Load per unit area

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 5 of 43
Eu Young’s Modulus of Soil

υ Poisson’s Ratio (= 0.3)
A’, B’ Non-dimensional functions
CRr Recompression Ratio
Cr Recompression Index
CRc Compression Ratio
Cα Coefficient of Secondary Consolidation
Cc Compression Index
Po’ Initial Effective Overburden Pressure
dP’ Increase of Vertical Effective Pressure
Pc Pre-consolidation Pressure
eo Initial Void Ratio
H Thickness of Compressible Soil Layer
t Time (Year)
ϕ Angle of Dilatancy
Rk Bearing Capacity Factor
qt Cone Tip Resistance
Pall Allowable Geotechnical Capacity of Pile
Ps Shaft Resistance of Pile
Pb Base Resistance of Pile
fsi Unit Skin Friction of Pile
β Friction coefficient
fb Unit End Bearing Resistance of Pile
Nt End bearing factor
As Shaft Area of Pile
Ab Base Area of Pile
Nave Averaged SPT-N Blow Counts for the Layer
FSs Factor of Safety for Shaft
FSb Factor of Safety for Base
fs-neg Unit Negative Skin Friction
σv-ave’ Average Effective Overburden Pressure
β Empirical Factor as Suggested by Meyerhof (1976)
PNSF Total Negative Skin Friction
R Stiffness Factor for Soil
Ep Young’s Modulus of Pile
Ip Moment of Inertia of Pile
K Soil Modulus
k1 Terzaghi’s Sub-grade Modulus
Lp Pile Embedment Length
Mult Ultimate Bending Moment Capacity of Pile
Mcracking Moment Capacity of Pile at Serviceability Limit State
Hult Ultimate Lateral Capacity of Pile
e Free Standing Length
ks Modulus of Sub-Grade Reaction
ρ Settlement of Pile at Working Load
Ws Load on Pile Shaft
Wb Load on Pile Base
B Pile Diameter
Eb Deformation Modulus of Soil Beneath Pile Base

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 6 of 43
1. Introduction
Lotte Chemical Titan (M) Sdn Bhd (LCTM) intends to develop the Proposed TE-3 Project
at Pasir Gudang, Johor, Malaysia. LCTM awarded the construction of the proposed
project to GS Engineering & Construction Corporation (GS E&C). LCTM has also
awarded the geotechnical investigation and the geotechnical interpretative report for the
project to Geolab Sdn Bhd (Geolab) and GL Konsult Sdn Bhd (GLK), respectively.
1.1. Scope of Work
Based on the information provided, the Project consists of Toluene Tank at Terminal 3
Area and process equipment at K-COT Area. The main purpose of the investigation is to
finalise the type of foundation for these structures. The scope of work for this site
investigation consists of nine boreholes (BH) with associated in-situ testing and sampling;
two down-hole PS wave logging; plate load tests (PLT); test pits (TP); thermal
conductivity test of soil; field permeability tests; pressuremeter tests; and electrical
resistivity tests (ERT).
The scope of work for this geotechnical interpretation report includes:

1. Describe the regional geology, develop the subsurface soil profile and discuss the
ground water conditions.
2. Identify unfavourable features including the aggressiveness of soil and ground
water.
3. Develop relevant geotechnical parameters including compressibility and strength
parameters. Provide recommendation on soil improvement, if required.
4. Conduct desktop seismic study and recommendation for seismic design.
5. Assess the liquefaction potential of the site.
6. Propose suitable foundation for the Toluene Tank and compute initial and creep
settlement of tank.
7. Provide design recommendation for shallow foundation and deep foundation.
8. Design for design of isolated / strip footings and provide safe bearing pressure for
raft foundations at different depths.
9. Design for pile foundation design including anticipated termination depth; vertical,
horizontal and pull out capacity considering negative skin friction; recommend
suitable pile types and the recommended pile diameter.
10. Recommendation of pile loading test procedure.
11. Recommend type of cement / concrete for substructures and superstructures.
12. Dynamic foundation design recommendation.
13. Earthwork recommendation including compaction criteria, road and pavement, and
propose modulus of sub-grade reaction.
14. Summarise the findings in a geotechnical design report.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 7 of 43
1.2. Site Description
The site location plan for the proposed project is shown in Figure 1 whilst the site layout
plan is presented in Figure 2. K-COT Area is approximately 4.8 acres whilst Terminal 3
Area where the Toluene Tank will be located is approximately 19.4 acres.
The site consists of relatively flat ground. It is assumed that the existing ground level is
the final platform level for the proposed project. The borehole levels indicate that the
existing ground level varies from +4.4m RL to +4.9m RL for the K-COT Area, whereas the
ground level for the Terminal 3 Area: Toluene Tank is approximately +5.5m RL.
1.3. Information Provided
The following documents and drawings provided by GS E&C form the basis for this
report:
Doc/Dwg No. Title
1 Site & Boring Hole Location Plan for TE-3 Project – K-COT Area
2 Site & Boring Hole Location Plan for TE-3 Project – Terminal 3 Area: Toluene
Tank
3 14126A-RQ-CS-001 Rev. 2 Geotechnical Investigation Specification

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 8 of 43
2. Interpretation of the Soil Investigation
2.1. Site Investigation Scope of Works
The layout plan of the soil investigation is presented in Figure 2. The scope of work for
the site investigation consists of:
1) 9 nos. of boreholes with in-situ testing and sampling.
2) 3 nos. of permeability tests.
3) Pressuremeter tests for the borehole drilled at Terminal 3 Area.
4) 2 nos. of down-hole PS Wave Logging.
5) 2 nos. of plate load tests.
6) 4 nos. of earth resistivity tests.
7) 3 nos. of soil thermal resistivity tests.
The soil investigation was carried out in accordance with ASTM and others relevant
codes and standards. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were carried out at 1.5m
intervals up to the termination depth. Disturbed SPT samples were collected and placed
in watertight bags for laboratory testing. Undisturbed samples were taken whenever soft
to firm soil layer is encountered which permit the undisturbed sampling. The boreholes
were terminated after encountering 4 times consecutively SPT N greater than 50.
2.2. Regional Geology
The distribution of the main geological formations in the project site is illustrated in Figure
3. The regional bedrock geology of this area is the granite, acid intrusives rocks of the
Quarternary age. The Quartenary age rocks formed due to magma that cools and
solidifies within the crust about 2 million years ago. Surrounded by pre-existing rock, the
magma cools slowly, and as a result these rocks are coarse grained. Throughout the site,
the parent bedrock is overlain by relatively thick residual soil cover, and then the in-situ
Alluvium. The Alluvium is in turn covered by filled material. All the boreholes were
terminated in the residual soil, which is the weathered derivatives of the parent bedrock.
2.3. Subsurface Soil Profile
The borehole logs are presented in Appendix A. The subsoil conditions are generally
uniform throughout the site. The subsoil profiles as presented in Figures 4, consist of the
following:
1. The site is generally underlain by 4m to 10m of firm sandy CLAY except that 4m
of soft sandy CLAY was encountered at BH1 directly from the ground surface.
2. The sandy CLAY is underlain by stiff sandy CLAY/SILT with thickness of up to
6m.
3. The stiff sandy CLAY/SILT is further underlain by 3m to 13m thick of very stiff
sandy SILT.
4. Beyond that, hard sandy SILT was encountered at depth varying from 16m to
24m below ground.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 9 of 43
2.4. Ground Water Table
During the field work, water levels in the boreholes were measured daily before
commencement of work in the morning. The measured water levels were recorded on the
borehole logs and summarised in Table 2.1. The record shows that the ground water
table is 0.4m–2.2m below existing ground level. Water levels are expected to fluctuate
corresponding to seasonal weather variation. Therefore, the design ground water level is
taken as 0.5m below ground level.
Table 2.1: Ground Water Table in Boreholes during Soil Investigation

Borehole Water Level During Drilling Water Level at the End of Drilling
BH1 0.7mbgl 0.7mbgl
BH2 0.9mbgl 0.9mbgl
BH3 0.4mbgl 0.4mbgl
BH4 0.8mbgl 0.8mbgl
BH5 1.0 – 1.1mbgl 1.1mbgl
BH8 0.8mbgl 0.8mbgl
BH9 2.2mbgl 2.2mbgl
2.5. Geotechnical Design Parameters
Summary of the laboratory testing is presented in Appendix B. Based on the laboratory

and in-situ SPT tests, the recommended geotechnical design parameters are
summarised in Table 2.2. Generally for K-COT area, the laboratory determined
compression ratio, CRc is in the order of 0.15 for the soft to firm sandy CLAY with high
overconsolidation ratio. The CRc values adopted for settlement analyses for the sandy
CLAY are conservatively taken as 0.2. The measure OCR value is also very high. In the
analyses, OCR of 2 and 5 are adopted for soft and firm CLAY, respectively. The
measured recompression ratio, CRr ranges from 11% to 21.4% of the CRc values. The
CRr values of about 20% of CRc are adopted for analyses. The consolidation test results
are presented in Appendix B.
Table 2.2: Geotechnical Design Parameters Derived from Boreholes
γb C’ φ’ Cu Eu
Depth Soil Type NSPT CRc CRr OCR
kN/m3 kPa o kPa MPa
BH1
0-4 mbgl Soft sandy CLAY 2-4 16 5 24 20 5 0.2 0.04 2
4-9 mbgl Firm sandy CLAY 6-7 18 7 28 40 10 0.15 0.03 5
9-22 mbgl Very stiff sandy SILT 17-27 19 10 31 130 100 0.05 0.01 10
>22 mbgl Very hard sandy SILT >50 20 10 38 250 200 - - -
BH2
0-10 mbgl Stiff sandy SILT 11-15 18 10 30 70 75 0.10 0.02 5
>18 mbgl Very hard sandy SILT >50 20 10 40 250 200 - -
BH3

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 10 of 43

BH4
5-7 mbgl Stiff sandy SILT 14 18 10 30 70 75 0.10 0.02 5
Very stiff sandy
7-16 mbgl 16-28 19 10 35 130 100 0.05 0.01 10
CLAY/SILT
>16 mbgl Very hard sandy SILT 31-50 20 10 40 250 200 - - -
BH5
35 -
>18 mbgl Hard sandy SILT 20 10 40 250 200 - - -
50
BH6
Firm to stiff sandy
0-6 mbgl 8-10 18 7 28 45 10 0.15 0.03 5
CLAY
Very dense gravelly
>15 mbgl >50 20 - 40 - 300 - - -
SAND
BH7
4-9 mbgl Stiff sandy CLAY 11-14 18 10 30 70 75 0.10 0.02 5
BH8
Stiff sandy
7-13 mbgl 10-14 18 10 30 70 75 0.10 0.02 5
CLAY/SILT
33 -
>16 mbgl Very hard sandy SILT 20 10 40 250 200 - - -
50
BH9
Very stiff sandy
13-24 mbgl 19-27 19 10 35 130 100 0.03 0.006 10
CLAY/SILT
24 mbgl Very hard sandy SILT >50 20 10 40 250 200 - - -
In-situ Permeability Tests

In-situ permeability test results of hydraulic sand fill for three locations, BH6, BH7 and
BH9 are presented in Appendix A and summarised in Table 2.3. The inferred in-situ
permeability varies from about 1.38x10-06 m/s to 1.35x10-05 m/s.
Table 2.3: Summary of Field Permeability Tests
Test No. Depth Soil Permebility, K

BH6 6m 1.35E-05 m/s
BH7 9m 1.38E-06 m/s

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 11 of 43
BH9 6m 1.64E-06 m/s
Pressuremeter Tests
The virgin and unload/reload shear modulus of the hydraulic sand fill determined using
pressuremeter tests are presented in Appendix A and summarised in Table 2.4. The
shear modulus inferred from piezocone (40MPa to 160MPa) agree reasonably well with
the reload deformation modulus measured using pressuremeter tests (40MPa to
210MPa).
Table 2.4: Summary of Pressuremeter Tests
Borehole Test Depth Virgin Deformation Modulus, EPMT Reload Deformation Modulus, EPMT
1 6.0-7.0m 3.33MPa 16.19MPa
BH9
2 12.0-13.0m 4.18MPa 182.54MPa
Downhole PS Logging
Geophysical methods such as down-hole PS logging is used to characterize the dynamic
soil properties of the subsoil. It should be highlighted these are low-strain tests which are
not large enough to induce significant non-linear, non-elastic stress strain behavior.The
dynamic properties of the subsoil inferred from down-hole PS logging results are
presented in Appendix A and summarised in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5: Summary of Dynamic Properties Inferred from Cross-hole PS Logging Tests
P Wave S Wave Rigidity Factor, Poisson’s Young’s Modulus
Borehole Depth
Velocity (m/s) Velocity (m/s) G (kgf/cm2) ratio, n (kgf/cm2)
0.0m 1200 400 2609.58 0.438 7502.55
1.0m 1200 400 2609.58 0.438 7502.55
2.0m 1200 400 2609.58 0.438 7502.55
3.0m 1200 400 2609.58 0.438 7502.55
4.0m 1200 400 2609.58 0.438 7502.55
5.0m 1200 400 2609.58 0.438 7502.55
DH1 6.0m 1400 460 3451.17 0.439 9935.84
7.0m 1400 460 3451.17 0.439 9935.84
8.0m 1400 460 3451.17 0.439 9935.84
9.0m 1400 460 3451.17 0.439 9935.84
10.0m 1700 560 5114.78 0.439 14721.77
11.0m 1700 560 5114.78 0.439 14721.77
12.0m 1700 560 5114.78 0.439 14721.77
0.0m 1300 430 3015.7 0.439 8676.62
1.0m 1300 430 3015.7 0.439 8676.62
2.0m 1300 430 3015.7 0.439 8676.62
3.0m 1300 430 3015.7 0.439 8676.62
4.0m 1300 430 3015.7 0.439 8676.62
DH2 5.0m 1300 430 3015.7 0.439 8676.62
6.0m 1300 430 3015.7 0.439 8676.62
7.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68
8.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68
9.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68
10.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 12 of 43
11.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68

12.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68
13.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68
14.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68
15.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68
16.0m 1800 570 5299.08 0.444 15306.64
17.0m 1800 570 5299.08 0.444 15306.64
18.0m 1800 570 5299.08 0.444 15306.64
The results of vertical electrical sounding (electrical resistivity tests) and thermal
conductivity test are attached in Appendix C.
2.6. Aggressiveness of Soil & Groundwater to Concrete & Steel
Steel
Four soil resistivity tests were conducted during the soil investigation. The locations of
these tests are illustrated in Figure 2A. The degree of aggressivity of soil to steel can be
estimated based on the correlation as summarised in Table 2.6. The resistivity measured
for ERT1, ERT2, ERT3 and ERT4 varies from 4,180 to 390,110 ohm cms, implying that
the soil can be considered as mildly aggressive to unlikely to be aggressive.
Table 2.6: Classification of Soil Aggressivity Based on Soil Resistivity
Soil Resistivity (ohm cms) Degree of Corrosivity

<1,000 Highly aggressive
1,000 to 3,000 Aggressive
3,000 to 10,000 Mildly aggressive
>10,000 Unlikely to be aggressive
Concrete
The guides on aggressivity of groundwater and soil to concrete and recommendations for
mix design are based on BS 5328: part 1: 1997 as shown in Appendix D. The pH values
of the soil samples vary from 4.5 to 4.9. The soil’s sulphate contents range from 0.02% to
0.06%. Based on the chemical test results, the Project area is classified as sulphate class
1 condition. Based on the recommendations for mix design, Normal Portland cement
conforming to BS 12 is recommended.
2.7. Critical Ground Condition
Based on the results of soil investigation, the subsurface soil profile of the area in the
vicinity of BH1 comprises a layer of soft, compressible sandy CLAY with limited thickness
of not more than 4m. This clay layer is comparatively more critical in terms of settlement
and stability than at the rest of the areas.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 13 of 43
3. Seismic Assessment and Liquefaction Potential
3.1. Tectonic and Seismicity
Peninsular Malaysia is within the seismically stable region, which is fringed by tectonically
active zone at the western (west coast of Sumatra), southern and eastern (South China
Sea and East Philippines) boundaries. The earthquakes of these relatively less stable
regions can produce secondary effects within the stable blocks. Shocks felt in Pasir
Gudang in the past have been mild and normally associated with distant events beyond
Sumatra.
Due to the absence of a national seismic design code in Malaysia, some local projects
adopt PGA value for rock corresponding to zone with low seismic hazard from various
regional seismic hazard maps, and then perform ground motion analysis to determine the
PGA for ground surface. If a more accurate evaluation is necessary for this site, site
specific probabilistic seismic hazard assessment by other specialists may be required.
According to local experience, some of the major industrial development at the coastal
area of Peninsular Malaysia adopted ground PGA of between 0.05g to 0.10g. In the
absence of the ground PGA in the design brief, surface PGA of 0.092g is adopted in this
geotechnical report. The moment magnitude for earthquake, Mw, is taken as 7.0 in the
analysis.
3.2. Liquefaction Potential Assessment
Liquefaction can result in the following:

1) Liquefaction-induced vertical settlement.
2) Lateral displacement in sloping ground.
3) Surface manifestations such as sand boils, surface cracks, etc.
The conditions contributing to liquefaction are:

1) Soil type, especially sands and silty material.
2) Material with uniform particle size (i.e., poorly graded).
3) Saturated or near-saturated soil.
4) Low relative density (i.e., less than about 50%, or conversely low penetration
resistance).
5) Low confining pressure (i.e., within the top layers of up to 15m - 20 m).
Liquefaction Susceptibility
The liquefaction potential can be assessed either based on SPT (Seed and Idriss, 1971)
or CPT data (NCEER approach, Youd et al., 2001). However, it should be highlighted that
for this project where the underlying soil profile consists of highly layered strata,
liquefaction assessment using SPT data which is not continuous may not be reliable. This

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 14 of 43
is due to the potential of missing layers that can be liquefiable. However, in the absence
of CPT data, preliminary assessment is conducted using SPT data in this report.
The SPT-based method (Boulanger & Idriss, 2004) recommends that, fine grained soils
be categorised as “sand-like” or “clay-like” if the Plasticity Index (PI) is less or more than
7%, respectively. “Sand-like” soil is prone to liquefaction, whilst “clay-like” soil is prone to
cyclic failure and not liquefaction. However, recent works by Seed et al. (2003) and Bray
and Sancio (2006) concluded that fine grained soils (e.g., some silts and silty clays) with
a liquid limit less than 37 (LL < 37), a plasticity index less than 12 (PI < 12) and a ratio of
water content to liquid limit greater than 0.8 (wc/LL > 0.8) could also experience
liquefaction.
To minimise the liquefaction potential in “sand-like” material, it is generally recognised

that the minimum SPT N value without overburden correction should be:
• 10 for clayey sands with at least 35% fines.
• 15 for clean sands with less than 5% fines.
It is generally accepted that the liquefaction susceptibility is vulnerable for soil layer with
low confining pressure with depth of less than 15m to 20m. The soil type and stiffness of
soil layers within the top 20m are examined to evaluate the liquefaction potential. Based
on the borehole logs and laboratory test data, the low SPT N values indicate that the site
is subject to considerable risk from seismically induced liquefaction. The assessment
using representative borehole logs from various locations of the site are summarised in
Table 3.1. The borehole logs indicate that there appears to be negligible risk from
seismically induced liquefaction.
Liquefaction Assessment
Liquefaction assessment can be determined by evaluating the ratio of cyclic resistance
ratio (CRR) to cyclic stress ratio (CSR). Liquefaction will not occur when CRR is greater
than CSR. The CSR is determined from an equation by Seed and Idriss (1971) based on
the maximum ground surface acceleration and in situ stress of the soil.
The CRR can be determined from triggering curves derived from empirical data based on
SPT data (the triggering curves by Seed et al, 2003). The liquefaction assessment using
SPT data is presented in Appendix E.
Liquefaction potential can be quantified with a factor of safety (FOS). FOS is defined as
the ratio of CRR/CSR. The calculated FOS is greater than 1, indicating that the site is not
subject to liquefaction risk.
Liquefaction potential index, LPI is introduced by Iwasaki et al. (1978) to predict the
potential of liquefaction to cause surface damage at site. Surface manifestation is
possible when LPI exceeds 5, whilst lateral spreading in sloping ground may occur when
LPI is greater than 15. Generally, the LPI for the site is very low, indicating low
liquefaction potential.
As mentioned before, liquefaction analyses based on CPT has greater reliability and
repeatability over SPT measurement, considering the highly layered soil profile at the

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 15 of 43
proposed site. With CPT data, relatively more accurate liquefaction assessment and
estimation of post-liquefaction vertical settlements can be conducted.
Table 2.4: Potentially Liquefiable Zones at the Site
BH Soil Type Depth (N<15) SPT N Remarks

Soft sandy CLAY 0-4 mbgl 2-4 CLAY
BH1 Firm sandy CLAY 4-9 mbgl 6-7 PI=15%, %fines=58%, clay-like
Very stiff sandy SILT 9-22 mbgl 17-27 PI=24%, %fines=43%, clay-like
Stiff sandy SILT 0-10 mbgl 11-15 PI=20%, %fines=59%, clay-like
BH2 Very stiff sandy SILT 10-18 mbgl 17-18 PI=30%, %fines=92%, clay-like
Very hard sandy SILT >18 mbgl >50 PI=19%, %fines=45%, clay-like
Firm sandy CLAY 0-7 mbgl 5-8 PI=23%, %fines=65%, clay-like
BH3 Stiff sandy SILT 7-13 mbgl 11-15 PI=23%, %fines=65%, clay-like
PI=21%, %fines=55%, clay-like
Firm sandy CLAY 0-5 mbgl 6-8
BH4 Stiff sandy CLAY 5-7 mbgl 14 CLAY
Very hard sandy SILT >17 mbgl 31-50 No Risk, N>50
BH5 Very stiff sandy SILT 7-18 mbgl 17-20 PI=13%, %fines=94%, clay-like
Hard sandy SILT >18 mbgl 35 - 50 No Risk, N>35
Firm to stiff sandy CLAY 0-6 mbgl 8-10 PI=36%, %fines=62%, clay-like
Stiff sandy SILT 6-10 mbgl 13-14
BH6
Very dense gravelly SAND >15 mbgl >50 No Risk, N>50
Firm sandy CLAY 0-4 mbgl 6-8
BH7 Firm sandy CLAY 4-9 mbgl 11-14 CLAY
Very hard sandy SILT >18 mbgl >50 No Risk, N>50
Stiff sandy CLAY/SILT 7-13 mbgl 10-14 PI=29%, %fines=44%, clay-like
BH8
Very hard sandy SILT >16 mbgl 34 - 50 No Risk, N>34
BH9 Stiff sandy SILT 9-13 mbgl 12-14 PI=15%, %fines=72%, clay-like
Very stiff sandy CLAY/SILT 13-24 mbgl 19-27 PI=17%, %fines=62%, clay-like

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 16 of 43
4. Tank Foundation
4.1. Foundation Design Criteria
The tank foundation design is in accordance with the Annexure B of API653. The
following considerations were taken for the design of tank foundation:
1. Foundations for vertical (atmospheric) storage tanks shall take the form of tank pad
constructed with granular materials, such as crushed rock or coarse sand.
2. The tank foundation shall be designed as a flexible foundation with adequate
strength to ensure that:
• The tank remains stable;
• deformation in the tank base is within serviceable limits;
• unequal foundation pressure is distributed uniformly via the foundation.
3. Total rigidity of the tank foundation and/or rigid elements in, around, and under the
tank shall be avoided.
4. Pile foundation or ground treatment under the tank foundation may be considered if,
• Stability of the tank foundation is critical;
• deformation of the tank foundation is beyond serviceable limits;
• risk of earthquake induce liquefaction is high.
5. The following conditions shall be taken into consideration for the stability analysis of
the shoulder and tank foundation:
• Earthquake loads;
• highest possible ground water level;
• slope’s angle of the shoulder;
• geotechnical properties of the tank foundation materials and subsoil;
• load provided by the tank and its contents during hydrostatic testing, operation
and maintenance.
4.2. Loading Condition of Tank Foundation
Storage tanks 2TK-5250NB are 20m in diameter and 17.7m high with storage capacity of
about 5,560m3. The total weight of empty tank is assumed to be approximately 30 tons.
During operation and hydrotest, the total weight are 4867.2 tons and 5,590 tons,
respectively. The loading during hydrotest is taken into consideration in the design
analyses, which is the most critical condition. The recommended peak horizontal ground
acceleration of 0.092g is adopted in the stability analyses.
The proposed tank pad foundation consists of crushed stone ring with inner compacted
sand fill. The functions of the tank foundation are:
• To distribute and transfer the tank loading to the underlying subgrade to ensure that
the total and differential settlement remain within allowable limits;
• to raise the tank bottom above ground water, standing fluid from minor spillages, etc;

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 17 of 43
• to provide a smooth surface with sufficient bearing capacity and stability for tank
construction and operation;
• to drain away rain water run-off from the tank shell and tank bottom.
The minimum height of tank foundation shall be 0.6m above the adjacent terrain, not
including the predicted long-term settlement. The width of tank foundation shall be larger
than the size of storage tank with a pre-determined shoulder width. The requirements of
the tank foundation shoulder are:
• To provide lateral support to the tank foundation during construction, operation and
maintenance;
• to resist edge settlement below the tank shell;
• to resist wash-out of the tank foundation due to bottom leakages and possible
ingress of rain water;
• to resist erosion by wind or water.
The dimensions of the tank foundation are based on the limiting values as summarised in
Table 4.1. These values are recommended taking into account the tank height, density of
product, type and height of tank foundation, slope of the foundation edge, etc.
Table 4.1: Limiting Values for Tank Foundations with Crushed Stone Ring
Height of Tank, H Min. Tank Shoulder Width from annular Maximum Height of Tank
[m] Plate Edge, S [m] Foundation, T (maximum) [m]
10 1.00 1.50
20 1.50 1.00
For the proposed tank height of 17.7m, the recommended width of tank shoulder and
height of tank foundation are 1.5m and 1.1m, respectively. The proposed gradient of the
tank shoulder is 1:10 and the slope of the shoulder is taken as 1:1.5. It is recommended
that the top 1.5m of unsuitable existing fill is to be removed and replaced with well-
compacted sand fill. The dimensions of the proposed tank foundation are illustrated in
Figure 5.
4.3. Bearing Capacity of Tank Foundation
The ultimate bearing capacity of a circular foundation can be computed using the
following empirical procedure:
qult = (π + 2)Cu(1 + Sac - iac) for undrained case
= (π + 2) x 88 x (1 + 0.2 – 0) = 540 kPa
Cu = undrained shear strength of soil

Sac = 0.2B/L (shape factor)
B, L = width and length of foundation
i ac = 0.5 – 0.5(1 – H’/ACu)0.5 (inclination factor)
H’ = horizontal component of resultant load at the base of foundation
A = effective foundation area

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 18 of 43
The formula adopted to obtain the ultimate bearing capacity of a circular foundation,
corresponding to undrained case was based on the extended formula by Brinch Hansen.
This extended formula was modified from the basic Terzaghi’s bearing capacity theory,
taking into consideration the shape factor and load inclination factor.
The undrained shear strength, Cu is taken as the average values from ground surface to
a depth equivalent to two times the tank diameter of 20m. However, the very hard
material within the stress influenced zone is ignored for conservatism. The average Cu
inferred from SPT N values are:
BH9: Cu-ave = (45x9 + 70x4 + 130x11)/24 = 88kPa
The average Cu inferred from SPT N is approximately 88kPa. The calculated ultimate
bearing capacity of the tank foundation is in the order of 540kPa.
The tank pressure on the subgrade distributed through 1.1m thick tank pad is calculated
using pressure influence method by Giroud and Noiray:
pt = Pt / π((D/2) + htanα)2 + γh
= 50580 / π(10 + 1.1x0.7)2 + 20x1.1
= 131kPa
pt = Tank pressure on subgrade

Pt = Tank loading
D = Tank diameter
h = Tank pad thickness
γ = Tank pad unit weight
tanα = 0.7 for φ = 35°
The factor of safety for bearing capacity is 4.1 which is higher than the recommended
safety factor of 3.
4.4. Stability of Tank Foundation
Stability analyses were carried out for the tank foundation and to determine the minimum
factor of safety against instability based on Bishop’s method for circular slip surface,
using limit equilibrium technique. This method assumes subdivision of the sliding soil
mass into vertical slices. The normal stresses along the slip surface are calculated using
the equation of vertical equilibrium of a slice, assuming that the forces transmitted
between neighbouring slices is strictly horizontal.
The safety factor is defined as the ratio of the maximum resisting moment to the moment
of the actual driving forces, both taken with respect to the centre of the slip circle
considered. A computer program, GGU-STABILITY is used to conduct the analysis and a
brief description of the program is presented in Appendix F. Generally, undrained
analyses for the short-term failure are considered to be more critical for loading on soft
clay. However, both the drained and undrained analyses were conducted.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 19 of 43
Stability analyses of the tank foundation shall take into consideration the following factors:
• Tank loading during hydro-testing, operation, maintenance, and earthquake loads;
• highest possible ground water level;
• slope gradient and width of tank shoulder;
• geotechnical properties of the tank foundation materials (compacted sand fill and
crushed rock) and suitable fill material as presented in Table 4.2;
• geotechnical properties of subsoil as summarised in Table 2.2.
Table 4.2: Design Parameters for Suitable Fill, Sand Fill and Crushed Rock
Materials Type γb (kN/m3) C’ (kPa) φ’ (o) Cu (kPa)
Suitable Fill 19 5 30 50
Sand Fill 19 0 35 -
Crushed rock 19 0 38 -
Minimum factors of safety of 1.2 and 1.3 are adopted for short-term stability with and
without considering seismic effect, respectively. The minimum factors of safety of 1.3 and
1.5 are adopted for long-term stability with and without considering seismic effect,
respectively. The results of the stability analyses are presented in Appendix F and
summarised in Tables 4.3 and 4.4.
Table 4.3: Results of Tank Stability Analyses – Undrained
Stability Analyses Factor of Safety

Without Seismic PGA=0.092g
BH9 1.3 1.2
Table 4.4: Results of Tank Stability Analyses – Drained
Stability Analyses Factor of Safety

Without Seismic PGA=0.092g
BH9 1.8 1.6
Results of the undrained analyses show that the factor of safety for the tank foundation’s
overall stability is adequate (>1.3 without seismic effect and >1.2 with seismic effect). The
most critical failure surface is within the firm sandy clay. Similarly, the drained analyses
for the tank foundation indicate that the factor of safety for overall stability is also
adequate (>1.5 without seismic effect and >1.3 with seismic effect).
4.5. Settlement Criteria
The settlement analyses of tank bottom, shell edge and bottom of tank are in accordance
with API653 whilst the settlement criteria are based on EEMUA 159 (7.5) as attached in
Appendix F.
Differential Settlement

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 20 of 43
The maximum differential settlement between any two points at 10 metre intervals should
not exceed 100mm (1%). For fixed roof tanks without an internal floating cover, the
maximum differential settlement between any two points along the entire circumference
measured near the bottom-to-shell connection should not exceed 190mm (Figure 7.5.1-1,
Appendix F).
Out-of-Verticality
The maximum out-of-verticality at the top of the tank shell should not exceed 1/100 of the
tank height (Figure 7.5.3-1, Appendix F). For the proposed 17.7m tank height, maximum
out-of-verticality at the top of the tank shell is calculated as 177mm.
Centre-to-Edge Bottom Settlement (Sagging)

Maximum allowable sag in the tank bottom after settlement, (Figure 7.5.4-1, Appendix F)
should not exceed the value derived from the following equation:
(100f/D) < [(100f0/D)2 + 3280Ks/Es]1/2
f = [D/100] x [(100f0/D)2 + 3280Ks/Es]1/2
f = maximum difference in settlement between periphery and centre

Es = Young’s modulus of elasticity for steel
Ks = the yield strength of the bottom plate
D = tank diameter
f0 = the initial deflection of centre of tank bottom in meter
A safety factor of 2 is recommended in view of possible reduced thickness due to

corrosion and distortions. The proposed tank diameter is 20m. The tank base gradient is
taken as 1:100 (f0 = 75mm) at the time of tank erection and assuming that high yield
strength steel plate is used, K is taken as 450 N/mm2 and E is taken as 200,000 N/mm2.
The maximum allowable sag is calculated as:
f = [(20/100) x [(100x0.075/20)2 + 3280x 450/200,000]1/2]/2
= 0.274m = 274mm
4.6. Settlement of Tank Foundation
The settlement due to the tank load consists of elastic settlement and consolidation
settlement. Elastic settlement occurs during or immediately after construction and
consolidation settlement is time dependent. The total settlement is the sum of the elastic
settlement and the consolidation settlement.
Elastic Settlement
Elastic settlements for sand and clay layers are calculated using strain theory as follows:
Si = q[(1-υ)/Eu][(1-2υ)A’+B’] x H
Consolidation Settlement
Settlement in clay is estimated out using Terzaghi’s conventional consolidation theory:

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 21 of 43
For final effective stress less than pre-consolidation pressure (Po’ + dP’ < Pc),
Sc = CRr log [(Po’+dP’)/Po’] x H
For final effective stress greater than pre-consolidation pressure (Po’ + dP’ > Pc),
Sc = {CRr log [Pc/Po’] + CRc log [(Po’+dP’)/Pc]} x H
Settlement in Sand
Settlement of the sandy material is estimated using de Beer and Martens’s method based
on piezocone cone resistance:
S = [Po’/(1.9xqc)] x ln[(Po’+dP’)/Po’] x H
H = Thickness of the compressible layer

q = Load per unit area
Cα = coefficient of secondary consolidation (= 0.04CRc)
t = time (1, 5,10,20 years)
CRr = recompression ratio, Cr/(1+eo)
Cr = recompression index
CRc = compression ratio, Cc/(1+eo)
Cc = compression index
Po’ = initial effective overburden pressure
dP’ = increase of vertical effective pressure
Pc = pre-consolidation pressure
eo = initial void ratio
qc = piezocone cone resistance (kPa)
Total Settlement
The consolidation settlement analyses are presented in Appendix F and the results are
summarised in Table 4.5. The top 1.5m of the existing material shall be excavated and
replaced with sand fill. The predicted total settlement at the tank centre is 150mm, whilst
the total settlement at the tank perimeter is 90mm. Settlement at the tank centre is
relatively higher than that occurring at the tank perimeter due to variation in stress
distribution.
Table 4.5: Results of Settlement Analyses for Tank Centre and Tank Edge
Elastic Settlement Consolidation Total Settlement
Location
(mm) Settlement (mm) (mm)
Tank Centre 130 105 235
Tank Perimeter 60 65 125
4.7. Differential Settlement
Differential Settlement between Tank Centre and Tank Edge

The differential settlement between the tank centre and the tank edge (sag) is 115mm.
The differential settlements between the tank centre and tank edge (sag), are well below
the maximum allowable sag of 274mm.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 22 of 43
Out-of-Verticality and Differential Settlement along Tank Perimeter

The out-of-verticality and differential settlement along tank perimeter cannot be
determined as there is only one borehole conducted at tank location.
4.8. Rate of Primary Consolidation
The rate of primary consolidation is estimated based on Terzaghi’s one-dimensional

consolidation theory, using a finite difference computer program, CONSOL. Description of
the computer program is attached in Appendix F. The adopted consolidation parameters
are as summarised in Table 2.2. The coefficient of consolidation, cv for post P’c range is
determined from the 1-D consolidation tests. The cv for the firm to stiff sandy clay/silt is
conservatively taken as 3m2/year. The results of time consolidation analyses are
presented in Appendix F. The estimated time for 90% consolidation is in the order of 2
year for the tank.
4.9. Hydrostatic Testing
The completed tank shall be water-tested and it is recommended that the storage tank to
be filled in four stages.
Settlement monitoring shall be conducted during hydrostatic testing to confirm that the
performance of the ground is in line with predictions. The measured settlement at the end
of each stage shall be compared with the predicted value. If the recorded settlement of
each stage is consistent with the prediction or lower, the succeeding stage of test can
commence. Similarly, if the recorded settlement of the final stage is consistent with the
prediction or lower, the test can be considered complete.
In the event that the settlement during hydrostatic testing exceeds the predicted values,
the rate of filling for succeeding stage should be reduced and the monitoring period may
be extended. If the recorded settlement for the fully loaded tank exceeds the estimated
settlement, the hydrostatic testing should be treated as preloading with a suitable rate of
filling introduced in order to reduce post-construction residual settlement during tank
operation. Some operational constraints on the initial filling rate during operation may be
imposed based on the settlement monitoring records of the hydrostatic testing.
In the event that significant differential settlement or tilt occurs, re-levelling of the tank
(under the tank shell) should be taken into consideration, to compensate for differential
settlements or tilt provided that it is technically acceptable.
The anticipated settlement during various stages of hydrostatic testing are summarised in
Table 4.8. However, the actual measured settlement during monitoring is expected to be
significantly lower than that indicated in Table 4.8 due to the short period of monitoring for
each stage of loading. The measured settlement during the short monitoring period will
include a small portion of the consolidation settlement.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 23 of 43
Table 4.8: Results of Settlement Analyses for Simulated Hydrostatic Test
Stage Simulated fill Estimated Settlement (mm)

height Centre Edge
1 0.5H = 8.85m 120 65
2 0.67H = 11.86m 160 85
3 0.83H = 14.69m 200 105
4 1.0H = 17.7m 235 125
4.10. Conclusion
The FOS for bearing capacity is 4.1, which is higher than the targeted FOS of 3. Stability
analyses indicate that the FOS against circular slip failure through the underlying firm soil
is adequate.
The predicted total settlement at the tank centre is 235mm, whilst the total settlement at
the tank perimeter is 125mm. The predicted settlement shall be acceptable to the tank.
However, if the predicted settlement is beyond the tolerable limit of the tank, piled
foundation shall be adopted.
The center to edge bottom settlement estimated using conventional consolidation theory
is 60mm which is less than the allowable differential settlement of 274mm.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 24 of 43
5. Shallow Foundation
Shallow foundation can be adopted for the shelter and pipe support. Foundation selection
for the structures and equipment is based on the following criteria:
1. Adequate safety factor against bearing capacity failure of the soils.
2. Adequate factor of safety for lateral and/or tension capacity, if required.
3. The total and differential settlement of the foundation during the life time of the
structure should be within tolerable limits.
4. Economical consideration, constructability and availability of plant and
equipment.
5. Disturbance to the existing facility during construction.
5.1. Bearing Capacity
The design of shallow footing is governed by settlement rather than bearing capacity. The
recommended footing depth considering the soil profile is 1.5m below ground level. The
footings can be either square or strip type. The design procedure for footing involves:
1. Determine the allowable bearing capacity.
2. Calculate the footing pressures that will result in 25mm settlements.
For square and rectangular footing, the ultimate bearing capacity is,
qult = (π + 2)Cu(1 + Sac - iac) for undrained case
The ultimate bearing capacity based on CPT is calculated using the equation
recommended by Luune, Robertson and Powell, 1997 (Cone Penetration Testing in
Geotechnical Practice):
qult = Rkqt + qo
Sac = 0.2B/L (0.2 for square footing and 0.067 for footing with L/B=3)
Rk = bearing capacity factor
qt = Average corrected cone resistance
The allowable bearing capacity of the footing, qall is obtained by applying a safety factor to
the ultimate bearing capacity. The recommended minimum safety factor for bearing
capacity is 3.
The bearing capacity is governed by the short-term (undrained) behaviour. The allowable
bearing capacity for footings of various sizes (1m to 2.5m), embedded 1.5m below ground
surface based on boreholes are summarised in Tables 5.1. The undrained shear strength
of the soil layer within the stress influence zone equal to two times the footing width
beneath the footing is considered.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 25 of 43
Table 5.1: Footing Allowable Bearing Capacity Based on Borehole Data
qall (kPa) with Footing Width of

Borehole 1m 1.5m 2m 2.5
BH1 L/B = 1 32 45 45 55
L/B = 3 30 40 40 45
BH2 L/B = 1 120 135 135 145
L/B = 3 105 120 120 125
BH3 L/B = 1 80 75 75 80
L/B = 3 70 65 65 70
BH4 L/B = 1 80 85 85 105
L/B = 3 70 75 75 95
BH5 L/B = 1 95 90 90 90
L/B = 3 85 80 80 80
BH6 L/B = 1 115 110 110 120
L/B = 3 100 95 95 105
BH7 L/B = 1 85 100 100 120
L/B = 3 75 90 90 105
BH8 L/B = 1 90 90 90 90
L/B = 3 80 80 80 80
5.2. Settlement
Settlement in Clay
Settlement in clay is estimated out using Terzaghi’s conventional consolidation theory:
For final effective stress less than pre-consolidation pressure (Po’ + dP’ < Pc),
Sc = CRr log [(Po’+dP’)/Po’] x H
For final effective stress greater than pre-consolidation pressure (Po’ + dP’ > Pc),
Sc = {CRr log [Pc/Po’] + CRc log [(Po’+dP’)/Pc]} x H
Settlement in Sand
Immediate settlement of the sandy material is estimated using de Beer and Martens’s
method based on piezocone cone resistance:
S = [Po’/(1.9xqc)] x ln[(Po’+dP’)/Po’] x H
Calculation for the footing allowable pressures corresponding to 25mm for various sizes
of rigid foundation are presented in Appendix G. Generally, the settlement calculation
shows that the footing allowable pressure is governed by settlement rather than bearing
capacity. Footing settlement analyses are summarised in Table 5.2. Based on both the
bearing capacity and settlement considerations, the recommended allowable footing
pressures, for footing embedded 1.5m below ground level are presented in Table 5.3.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 26 of 43
Table 5.2: Allowable Footing Pressures Corresponding to 25mm Settlement

BH1 L/B = 1 30 25 20 20
L/B = 3 20 20 15 15
BH2 L/B = 1 120 100 85 70
L/B = 3 100 75 60 50
BH3 L/B = 1 80 65 50 40
L/B = 3 65 40 35 30
BH4 L/B = 1 80 70 55 45
L/B = 3 70 50 40 35
BH5 L/B = 1 95 70 50 35
L/B = 3 65 45 35 30
BH6 L/B = 1 90 70 50 40
L/B = 3 65 45 35 30
BH7 L/B = 1 85 70 55 45
L/B = 3 70 50 40 35
BH8 L/B = 1 90 65 50 40
L/B = 3 65 40 35 30
Table 5.3: Recommended Allowable Footing Pressures

BH1 L/B = 1 30 25 20 20
L/B = 3 20 20 15 15
BH2 L/B = 1 135 100 85 70
L/B = 3 100 75 60 50
BH3 L/B = 1 90 65 50 40
L/B = 3 65 40 35 30
BH4 L/B = 1 140 105 90 80
L/B = 3 105 80 70 60
BH5 L/B = 1 95 70 50 35
L/B = 3 65 45 35 30
BH6 L/B = 1 90 70 50 40
L/B = 3 65 45 35 30
BH7 L/B = 1 95 70 55 45
L/B = 3 70 50 40 35
BH8 L/B = 1 90 65 50 40
L/B = 3 65 40 35 30
5.3. Plate Load Test
Two plate load test (PLT-1 and PLT-2) were carried out at the location as shown in
Figure 2A. PLT-1 was conducted near BH1 whereas PLT-2 was carried out next to BH5.
Safe bearing pressure of the soil was determined using the plate load test by measuring
the settlement under working pressure (1st cycle), twice the working pressure (2nd cycle)
and three times the working pressure (3rd cycle). The design pressure is taken as

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 27 of 43
200kPa. Modulus of subgrade reaction can also be calculated using Westergaard method
which is defined as the ratio of the bearing pressure over settlement for the 1st cycle
loading. A plate size of 300mm diameter and a working pressure of 200kN/m2 were
adopted for the tests. The plate load tests were carried out at 0.5m below existing ground
level. The results of the plate load tests are presented in Appendix G and summarised in
Table 5.4.
Table 5.4: Plate Load Test Results Summary

PLT Settlement @ Settlement @ 2 Settlement @ 3 Residual Modulus of
No. Working X Working X Working Settlement after Subgrade Reaction,
Pressure (mm) Pressure (mm) Pressure (mm) Unloading (mm) ks (kN/m3)
PLT-1 2.6 10.43 20.84 12.25 6.67 X 104
PLT-2 0.06 0.09 0.16 0.07 2.08 X 106
Based on the the plate load test carried out on 300mm diameter plate, the allowable
bearing pressure of the soil is more than 200kPa with factor of safety of 2. The settlement
due to three times the working load is less then 25mm. The safe bearing pressure
determined from the 300mm diameter plate load test is relatively higher than that
summarised in Tables 5.3 and 5.4 for 1m to 2.5m width footings.
5.4. Conclusion
Settlement analyses are conducted to estimate the allowable load on various footing
sizes corresponding to 25mm settlement. The calculated safe bearing pressures without
considering settlement are much higher than the allowable footing pressure in Tables 5.3
and 5.4. Hence, the allowable footing pressure is governed by settlement.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 28 of 43
6. Deep Foundation
Based on the soil condition, the most economical deep foundation type is driven piles.
Installation of piles by means of impact driving will result in the inevitable vibration. The
vibrations may result in settlement or damage to adjacent facility. Therefore, jacked-in pile
which will cause lesser disturbances to the surrounding environment is recommended.
6.1. Jack-In Concrete Spun Pile
This method of pile installation involves the use of hydraulic jacking system, support
frame, lateral movement mechanism and counter weights. The maximum jack-in force
can be up to 7,000kN with machine width of 13.5m, and the required clearance for piling
works is up to 6.9m. For relatively smaller jack-in force of 1,500kN, the corresponding
size of the machine is 6.6mx5.0m.
During pile installation, the jack-in force for every 300mm penetration is recorded. The
pile termination criteria or “set” is taken when the jack-in force increases indicating that
the pile has reached a bearing stratum. Generally, the pile is jacked to at least two times
the working load and maintain for at least 30 seconds. This set criteria will be repeated a
minimum of two cycles. This set criteria adopted shall be verified by static load tests.
The installation mechanism of jack-in pile is similar to an accelerated static load test. As
every pile is jacked to sustain a minimum force of up to two times the design load, the
capacity of each pile is verified in a manner similar to a static load test. The problem of
pile deviation and damages due to hard driving experienced by pile driving are
significantly reduced. The advantages of the jack-in piles are low noise and vibration.
6.2. Geotechnical Capacity
The allowable geotechnical capacity of the jack-in piles can be estimated based on the
SPT-N values using empirical correlation by Meyerhof:
Pall = Ps / FOSs + Pb / FOSb
n f si Asi f b Ab
= ∑ +
i =1 FS s FSb
Pall = allowable geotechnical capacity

Ps = shaft resistance of pile due to skin friction
Pb = base resistance of pile due to end bearing
fsi = unit skin friction for the layer
= 2 x Nave (a limit of 110kPa is adopted for the unit skin friction)
fb = unit base resistance
= 200 x N (for clayey soil with a limit of 10,000kPa)
= 400 x N (for sandy soil with a limit of 10,000kPa)

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 29 of 43
As = shaft area of pile

Ab = base area of pile
N = SPT-N blow counts
Nave = the averaged SPT-N blow counts for the layer under study
FSs = factor of safety for shaft (= 2)
FSb = factor of safety for base (= 2)
A factor of safety of 2.0 is adopted for both skin friction and end bearing. Jack-in piles
have significant residual pressures which are locked in at the pile base during installation.
As a result, higher end-bearing can be mobilised at working load. Jacked-in piles have a
high base stiffness which will result in less settlement at similar imposed load as
compared to driven piles and bored piles.
Geotechnical Capacity of Pre-Cast Concrete Spun Pile In Compression

The geotechnical pile capacity analyses for 250mm, 300mm, 350mm and 400mm
diameter concrete spun piles, Grade 80 Class B are presented in Appendix H. The
estimated pile lengths based on SPT-N can be summarised in Table 6.1. The
recommended working load is based on the assumption that the pile can be installed to
the design depths. Jack-in force higher than two times the working load may be required.
It is recommended that pilot test be carried out to assess the problem associated with pile
installation.
Table 6.1: Estimated Lengths of Pre-Cast Concrete Spun Piles and Allowable Working Loads in
Compression
Borehole Est. Pile Allowable Capacity In Compression (kN)

Length (m) 250mm 300mm 350mm 400mm
BH1 22 430 580 800 1000
BH2 18 430 580 800 1000
BH3 21 430 580 800 1000
BH4 18 430 580 800 1000
BH5 19 430 580 800 1000
BH6 15 430 580 800 1000
BH7 18 430 580 800 1000
BH8 18 430 580 800 1000
BH9 24 430 580 800 1000
Geotechnical Capacity of Pre-Cast Concrete Spun Pile In Tension

In the computation of the ultimate tension capacity of pile, only the contribution from the
skin friction of spun pile is considered. A safety factor of 3 is used to obtain the allowable
tension capacity. The maximum working load in compression and tension as well as the
estimated pile length for the spun pile are summarised in Table 6.2.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 30 of 43
Table 6.2: Estimated Lengths of Pre-Cast Concrete Spun Piles and Allowable Working Loads in
Tension
Borehole Est. Pile Allowable Capacity In Tension (kN)

Length (m) 250mm 300mm 350mm 400mm
BH1 22 200 240 280 320
BH2 18 170 200 230 270
BH3 21 190 230 270 310
BH4 18 140 230 260 300
BH5 19 180 210 250 280
BH6 15 140 170 200 230
BH7 18 170 210 240 280
BH8 18 160 190 220 260
BH9 24 220 270 320 360
6.3. Lateral Capacity of Pre-Cast Concrete Spun Pile
The lateral capacity of pile is calculated using the procedure established by Broms. The
first step involves determination of whether the pile will behave as a short rigid unit or as
an infinitely long flexible member. The stiffness factor R, is governed by the stiffness of
the pile (Young’s modulus, Ep and moment of inertia, Ip) and the soil modulus, K. K is
related to the undrained shear strength of the clay, Cu as summarised in Table 6.3.
R = 4 EP I P K
K = k1/5B
k1 = Terzaghi’s subgrade modulus
Table 6.3: Relationship of Soil Modulus to Cu of Stiff Over-consolidated Clay.

Consistency Stiff Very stiff Hard
Cu (kPa) 50-100 100-200 >200
K1 (MN/m3) 15-30 30-60 >60
K (MN/m2) 3-6 6-12 >12
Cu is taken as 40 kPa and the corresponding soil modulus is 3 MN/m2. The resulted
stiffness factor, R is 1.755. The criteria for behaviour as a short rigid pile or as a long
elastic pile are related to the embedded length Lp,
Lp ≤ 2R pile will behave as a rigid unit
Lp ≥ 3.5R pile will behave as an elastic member
The minimum pile length will be 20m and therefore will behave as an infinitely long elastic
pile. For an infinitely long pile, the soil passive resistance to yielding is infinite and thus
the lateral capacity is governed by the ultimate moment of resistance, Mult of the pile. The
ultimate lateral capacity of pile in cohesive soil,
Hult = 2 x Mult / (1.5B+0.5f) (fixed-headed piles)
f = Hult / (9xcuxB)

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 31 of 43
The lateral capacity of pile is predominantly affected by the soil from ground surface to
the point of virtual fixity. The undrained shear strength is taken as 40kPa. Hult can then be
obtained by trial and error until the two equations matches. Broms has also established a
graphical relationship for Hult /cuB2 and Mult / cuB3, from which Hult can be determined.
Lateral Capacity of Precast Spun Pile Based on Cracking Moment Capacity

The bending moment capacity and the allowable lateral capacities of various sizes of
spun piles corresponding to different service axial load are summarised in Tables 6.4
through 6.7. Both free-headed and fixed-headed piles are considered in the analyses.
The load interaction curves (plots of pile axial load versus allowable lateral capacity) for
spun piles are presented in Appendix H.
Table 6.4: Allowable Lateral Capacity for 250mm Dia. Concrete Spun Piles at Service Condition
Bending Moment Allowable Lateral Capacity (kN)
Axial Load (kN)
(kNm) Free-Headed Fixed-Headed
620 0 0 0
600 0.6 1.6 3.1
400 9.3 19.3 33.2
200 18.1 32.6 53.7
134.5 20.6 35.9 58.7
0 14.9 28.1 46.9
-100 10.8 21.8 37.2
-200 6.5 14.3 25.2
-300 2 5.0 9.4
-350.9 0 0 0
Axial Load (kN)
841.45 0 0 0
800 1.98 4.2 8.1
600 12.57 22.7 39.7
400 23 37.0 62.3
203.02 33.64 49.5 81.4
0 22.94 36.9 62.2
-100 17.16 29.3 50.3
-200 12.33 22.3 39.1
-300 6.8 13.3 24.2
-400 1.98 4.2 8.1
-435.41 0 0 0

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 32 of 43
Axial Load (kN)
1148.57 0 0 0
1000 8.95 15.3 28.1
800 21.69 33.1 57.6
600 33.48 47.0 79.6
400 45.6 59.8 99.3
284.49 53.02 67.0 110.2
200 48 62.2 102.9
0 35.56 49.3 83.2
-200 23.48 35.3 61.2
-400 11.06 18.5 33.6
-579.59 0 0 0
Axial Load (kN)
1498.19 0 0 0
1250 17.34 25.2 45.7
1000 34.29 45.3 78.6
750 51.81 63.2 106.8
500 70.09 79.9 132.3
366.63 79.4 87.8 144.3
250 71.22 80.9 133.3
0 53.67 65.0 109.5
-250 35.8 46.9 81.2
-500 18.47 26.7 48.2
-764.93 0 0 0
6.4. Settlement of Single Pile at Working Load
Settlement at pile head is the sum of the elastic shortening of the shaft and the
compression of the soil beneath the pile base given by:
ρ = (W s + 2W b)Lp / 2AsEp + 0.5W b/BEb
Ws = load on the pile shaft

Wb = load on the pile base
B = pile diameter
Eb = deformation modulus of the soil beneath the pile base (70MPa, spun pile
terminate at hard layer with SPT N in excess of 50)
Ep = Young’s modulus of pile (26,000MN/m2)
The estimated settlements of a single pile at working load are summarised in Table 6.8.
The deformation modulus of the soil beneath the pile base is assumed to be 200MPa and

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 33 of 43
300MPa as summarised in in Table 2.2, where the piles are expected to terminate at soil
layer with SPT N value exceeding 50.
Table 6.8: Estimated Settlements of Concrete Spun Piles at Working Loads
Borehole Ws Wb Lp Settlement, ρ (mm)

250mm Diameter Spun Pile
BH1 180 250 22 8
BH2 180 250 18 7
BH3 180 250 21 8
BH4 180 250 18 7
BH5 180 250 19 8
BH6 180 250 15 6
BH7 180 250 18 7
BH8 180 250 18 7
BH9 180 250 24 9
BH1 230 350 22 9
BH2 230 350 18 8
BH3 230 350 21 9
BH4 230 350 18 8
BH5 230 350 19 8
BH6 230 350 15 7
BH7 230 350 18 8
BH8 230 350 18 8
BH9 230 350 24 10
BH1 300 500 22 11
BH2 300 500 18 10
BH3 300 500 21 10
BH4 300 500 18 10
BH5 300 500 19 10
BH6 300 500 15 9
BH7 300 500 18 10
BH8 300 500 18 10
BH9 300 500 24 11
BH1 400 600 22 11
BH2 400 600 18 10
BH3 400 600 21 11
BH4 400 600 18 10
BH5 400 600 19 11
BH6 400 600 15 10
BH7 400 600 18 10
BH8 400 600 18 10
BH9 400 600 24 12

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 34 of 43
6.5. Conclusion
Jack in concrete spun pile is recommended considering that the proposed development is
located within existing facilities. Installation of piles by means of impact driving will result
in the inevitable vibration. The vibrations may result in settlement or damage to adjacent
facility. Therefore, jacked-in pile which will cause lesser disturbances to the surrounding
environment is recommended.
Grade 80 Type B concrete spun pile is recommended. The allowable working loads in
compression and tension and the corresponding pile length for spun piles of varying
diameters are summarised in Tables 6.1 and 6.2. The load interaction curves (plots of
pile axial load versus allowable lateral capacity) for spun piles are presented in Appendix
H. The anticipated settlement of the piled foundation is less than 25mm.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 35 of 43
7. Dynamic Foundation Design Recommendation
7.1. Foundation Recommendations for Vibrating Equipment
The choice of foundation types for vibrating equipment is governed by its loading. The
functions of the shallow foundation for vibrating equipment include the following:
1. To prevent excessive total and differential settlement of the foundation relative to
other fixed installations.
2. To prevent excessive bending under heavy concentrated loads or by unbalanced
rotating or reciprocating equipment.
3. To prevent damage to adjacent installations. For equipment with unbalanced
moving parts, the vibration may be transmitted to the ground. These vibrations
may result in settlement of the foundation and damage the adjacent installation.
Considering the above-mentioned criteria, the design of vibrating equipment foundation

shall include the following:
1. Design the machinery foundation with adequate bearing capacity to ensure
settlements under the applied stresses will not exceed the tolerable limits.
2. Place the machinery centre of gravity as close as possible to that of the
foundation in order to avoid tilting of the foundation.
3. Provide a mean to damp down vibrations.
The foundation bearing capacity, settlement and centre of gravity is relatively straight
forward. To absorb the vibrations within the foundation, the foundation mass must be
equal to or greater than the equipment weight (typically 3 times for centrifugal and 5 times
for reciprocating).
If the equipment loading is excessive and result in settlement beyond the tolerable limit of
the installation, deep foundation shall be adopted. Similarly, the centre of gravity of the
combination of pile cap and piles shall be as close as that of the pile group in plan view.
The effect of vibrations for piles in clay is relatively less than that in sand. For piles in
clay, the skin friction, end bearing and ultimate pile capacity will be reduced due to the
vibrations. The reduction increases with the ratio of applied stress to the ultimate stress of
the soil. For piles bearing on loose to medium dense sands, the vibrations will reduce the
skin friction and transfer the load to the toe, thus causing compaction of sand and result
in settlement. As a result of the settlement, the end bearing resistance may be increased.
The risks of settlement are much greater in the base of bored and cast-in-place piles than
with driven piles. This is due to the fact that the bored pile does not compact the soil and
the effect of boring may result in loosening of the sand.
Recommendations for the piles supporting vibrating equipment are:

1. The eccentricity between the equipment’s centre of gravity to that of piled
foundation shall not exceed 5% of width of pile group.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 36 of 43
2. A higher safety factor shall be adopted for skin friction and end bearing of piles
subject to cyclic loading. The recommended safety factors for static case are 2
and 3 for skin and end bearing, respectively. For vibrating equipment, the
recommended safety factors are 2.5 and 4, corresponding to skin and end
bearing. Thus, the percentages of allowable skin friction and end bearing
resistance for vibrating machinery are 80% and 75%, respectively.
3. The piles shall be driven to a dense to very dense sand layer or stiff clay layer.
4. Limit the end bearing resistance.
5. Quantify the lateral loads on piled foundation due to the torque of reciprocating
equipment. The pile deflection due to vibrating lateral load is assumed to be
double of that caused by static lateral load.
7.2. Foundation Recommendations for Blast Resilient Building
The selection criteria for building foundation is based on the allowable pressure of the soil
and the anticipated loadings. For relatively lightly loaded building, shallow footing is
recommended, whilst deep foundation shall be adopted if the loading exceed the
allowable bearing pressure of the soil.
For blast resilient building, the following are recommended:

1. Relative displacements between columns and walls shall be minimised by using
grade beams to tie together spread footings or pile caps of blast resilient building.
2. Foundation shall be designed to resist the peak reactions produced by resulting
from the dead, live, and blast loads, for static or dynamic case.
3. For blast load combinations, safety factors for overturning shall be 1.2, and 1.0
for sliding.
4. For vertical capacity of shallow foundations, 80% of the ultimate soil bearing
capacity shall be adopted.
5. For vertical capacity of deep foundations, 80% of the ultimate static capacities in
compression and in tension may be used.
6. For lateral capacity of shallow foundation, the normal force for the frictional
resistance shall be taken as the sum of the dead loads and the vertical load.
7. If either one of the passive resistance, frictional resistance, vertical piles, or
battered piles are used to support the lateral blast loading, the resistance shall be
taken as 80% of the ultimate static value. If two or more are used, the lateral
capacity shall be limited to 67% of the combined ultimate static resistance.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 37 of 43
8. Earthwork & Site Preparation
8.1. Stripping of Top Soil
The top soil shall be stripped off to a suitable depth below ground level. It is
recommended that at least 150mm of top soil to be removed. However, the extent of top
soil removal shall be determined at site during construction. Top soil removal shall include
the turf, vegetations, roots, other deleterious materials and localised unsuitable soil
deteriorated due to water ponding, etc. These top soils shall be removed from site and
not to be reused as fill material. The freshly prepared sub-grade shall be inspected
immediately prior to backfilling of 300mm minimum thick suitable material.
8.2. Excavation
According to borehole information, unsuitable material is not expected to be encountered

at the formation level. Localised unsuitable material, if detected below stripped ground or
below formation level, shall be excavated to firm ground and removed from site.
Formation Surfaces
The final 500mm of excavation directly above the formation surface for footing, pile caps
or concrete basin shall not be completed until immediately before the laying of blinding
materials, lean concrete etc. Excavation to formation shall be performed by suitable
machineries and shall be such that the blinding operations to be carried out immediately
and completed in one go. The work shall be planned properly, preventing opening up the
final formation surface too large an area and cannot complete the blinding in one go. If
rains, temporary cover/protection and drainage must be provided to the exposed final
formation surface that blinding has not been carried out.
The base of all excavations after being trimmed and leveled shall be well rammed and
compacted to form a solid formation. The prepared formation shall be prevented from
weathering, trampling by workmen and other construction activities. The base of
excavation shall consist of sound material with adequate bearing capacity and coefficient
of sub-grade modulus to supporting the superimposed loading.
Where tests show that the original soils encountered at or below formation level are soft,
loose or unstable, the excavation shall be carried down to suitable depths and
dimensions until sound materials complying with the requirements of these specifications
is reached. The excess excavation shall be made good with approved granular fill and
compacted accordingly.
If over excavation into original sound material occur beyond or below the designated lines
or levels, or if the prepared formation deteriorate and become soft or unstable, excess
excavation and softened formation shall be replaced with approved granular fill.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 38 of 43
Stockpile
The excavated suitable materials shall be stockpiled at a safe distance from the
excavation, in order not to compromise the stability of slope and excavation. If fill material
is stockpiled within the site, the height of the stockpile should be controlled in order not to
result in heaving of existing ground due to the stockpile. The height of the stockpile shall
not be greater than 5m at a slope of 1V:2H. Vehicles and equipment also shall not be
placed alongside the banks of the excavation.
Temporary Excavation Slope Gradient

The recommended temporary slope gradient for the excavation of less than 2m shall not
be steeper than 1V:1H. All excavations shall be provided with adequate drainage
measures to avoid ponding of water during rainfall, runoff and ground water infiltration.
8.3. Dewatering
According to the available soil investigation for the two previous projects, water levels in
the boreholes varied from 0.4m to 2.2m below ground level.
The recommended formation level for the footing is about 1.5m below ground level, which
is below the design ground water table. For the excavation of the pile cap and shallow
foundation, dewatering is required and the excavation need to be kept well drained and
dry by means of temporary drains, sumps, temporary earthwork surface sloping towards
the drains or sumps, etc. and by pumping.
All temporary drains shall be directed to the nearest water course or to sumps which are
pumped out to the roadside drain. The roadside drain shall have an adequately large
section so that no mud or water will spill onto the roads or pavements. The effluent
discharge system shall comply with the requirements of the local authorities. The
roadside drains in the vicinity of the site shall be kept free of silt due to site effluent. A
desilting basin of adequate size for this purpose shall be provided to remove silt from the
effluent before discharging it into the roadside drain.
8.4. Backfilling and Compaction
Fill Material
Adequate samples of the proposed imported fill material shall be taken and tested in the
laboratory prior to backfillig. The laboratory testing shall include classification tests
including Atterberg limits and particle size distribution. Suitable fill shall ideally consist of
soil free of organic and other deleterious materials, or rock lumps greater than 100mm.
The residual soil encountered at the Project site fulfils the above-mentioned requirements
and can therefore be used as suitable fill material. During backfilling, random samples
shall also be taken and tested.
The optimum moisture content and dry density of the fill material shall also be determined
prior to the commencement of filling operations. The compacted fill shall have dry density

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 39 of 43
of not less than 90% of its maximum dry density determined in the B.S. 1377 Compaction
Test (4.5kg rammer method).
The safety of workmen, ease of placement and compaction are primary considerations
when carrying out filling operations in narrow, confined spaces. Under these conditions,
only well graded granular soil will be permitted for use as fill material.
Backfilling
The fill material should be placed and spread uniformly in loose lift of not more than
300mm per layer, and uniformly compacted by approved rollers before the next layer is
applied. Each layer should be carefully inspected; soil or rock lumps shall be broken
down prior to compaction and any organic material shall be removed. Fill shall be built up
evenly over the full width of the area with a sloping surface sufficient to allow efficient
drainage of rain water and to prevent ponding.
Where the fill materials are transported by tippers, each load shall be subsequently
buldozed, spread and leveled in layers, and compacted accordingly.
Compaction
Compaction trials shall be carried out for each type of imported fill, in order to determine
the required compaction effort for the proposed equipment to obtain optimum compaction
for a given soil moisture contents. These trials shall also be used to determine the
variability of the proposed fill material for different weather conditions.
Prior to compaction, the moisture content of the fill material shall be controlled to within
±2% of the optimum moisture content. Compaction shall not be carried out when the fill is
too dry to achieve the satisfactory degree of compaction. In the case of dry fill, the
moisture content shall be increased by spraying with water from travelling water tanks or
by other approved means as the compaction proceeds.
The degree of compaction required shall be specified in terms of minimum percentage of

the maximum dry density (%MDD). The maximum dry density and optimum moisture
content for a given soil type can be obtained from Modified Proctor Tests.
Compaction of fill shall be controlled and carried out with sufficient passes of the
mechanical rammers to obtain at least 90% of the maximum dry density at optimum
moisture content compared with standard Proctor laboratory test results. Compliance field
tests shall be carried out to check the degree of compaction attained on Site. Where each
layer fails to obtain sufficient compaction according to the specification, filling shall not be
allowed to proceed with the next layer.
Where undue movement occurs in the course of compaction due to soft, unstable
foundation conditions under the fill, the area affected shall be excavated to appropriate
depths and dimensions and be run to spoil. The resultant excavation shall be backfilled
with suitable and approved materials deposited in layers, each not exceeding 300mm
thick in loose form, and compacted as hereinbefore specified, or with suitable
compressed air compactors or mechanical rammers where the excavation work is limited.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 40 of 43
8.5. Suitability of In-Situ Soil As Fill Material
Apart from the top soil consisting of turf, roots, vegetation and other deleterious materials,
the in-situ soil comprises residual soil is suitable to be used as general fill material.
However, these in-situ soils cannot be used as structural backfill as it consists of inter-
bedded layers of clayey SILT / sandy SILT with up to about 30% of fines.
Structural fill shall comprise medium to well-graded, clean, non-plastic sand. The
structural fill shall not contain more than 10% fines (material passing the 75µm sieve).
The sand shall not contain organic matter and material corrosive to steel.
8.6. Road Sub-grade, Sub-base and Base Course
Generally, the general backfill material including the road shoulder shall be compacted to
at least 90% MDD. The top 300mm of road sub-grade and below the footings shall be
compacted to a minimum of 95% MDD.
For the road, the prepared sub-grade shall be followed by 50mm of coarse sand sub-
base material. Locally available materials should be utilised for sub-base materials, from
an economic point of view. For maximum utilisation of suitable local materials, no
gradation is specified. However, the materials shall not include a deleterious amount of
organic materials, soft particles, clay lumps, etc. The nominal size shall not be greater
than 1/3 of the compacted layer thickness. Standard properties of sub-base material are
indicated in Table 8.1.
The sub-base shall be followed by a minimum of 250mm thick crushed rock base course.
This base course material shall be angular crusher run which is free of fines with
individual particles not large than 100mm. The proposed gradation of base course
materials is summarised in Table 8.2.
Table 8.1: Standard Properties for Sub-Base and Base Course Material
Quality Test Method Base Course Sub-base

CBR (%) BS:1377:1990 >30 >20
Plasticity Index BS:1377:1990 <6 <6
Table 8.2: Standard Gradation Limit for Base Course Material

Sieve size,
50 40 25 10 5 2.4 0.42 0.075
mm
% by weight
100 90-100 65-100 40-80 25-65 15-50 9-30 0-10
passing

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 41 of 43
9. Summary and Recommendation
The Project consists of Toluene Tank at Terminal 3 Area and process equipment at K-
COT Area. The objective of the investigation is to finalise the foundation type for these
structures and to provide a basis for the implementation of the Project. The site consists
of relatively flat ground. It is assumed that the existing ground level is the final platform
level for the proposed project. The borehole levels indicate that the existing ground level
varies from +4.4m RL to +4.9m RL for the K-COT Area, whereas the ground level for the
Terminal 3 Area: Toluene Tank is approximately +5.5m RL.
The regional bedrock geology of this area is the granite, acid intrusives rocks of the
Quarternary age. The Project site is directly underlain by recently filled material which is
in turn underlain by alluvium. The alluvium is then underlain by residual soil and further
underlain by granite bedrock.
Generally, the site is directly underlain by firm sandy CLAY, except of BH1 where soft
sandy CLAY is encountered. This soft soil layer may be critical in terms of settlement and
stability. The soft to firm sandy CLAY is in turn underlain by stiff to very stiff sandy SILT
with increasing stiffness before encountering hard sandy SILT. The ground water
monitoring records during field works indicate ground water level varies from 0.4m to
2.2m. The borehole logs indicate that there appears to be negligible risk from seismically
induced liquefaction. The assessment for liquefaction potential indicates that the factor of
safety against liquefaction is generally exceeding 1.
The measured soil resistivity indicates that the soil can be classified as mildly aggressive
to unlikely to be aggressive to steel. Based on the sulphate content of ground water and
soil, as well as the pH values, the degree of severity can be classified as sulphate class 1
condition. For mix design, Normal Portland cement conforming to BS 12 is
recommended.
The FOS for bearing capacity is 4.1, which is higher than the targeted FOS of 3. Stability
analyses indicate that the FOS against circular slip failure through the underlying firm soil
is adequate. The predicted total settlement at the tank centre is 235mm, whilst the total
settlement at the tank perimeter is 125mm. The predicted settlement shall be acceptable
to the tank. However, if the predicted settlement is beyond the tolerable limit of the tank,
piled foundation shall be adopted. The center to edge bottom settlement estimated using
conventional consolidation theory is 115mm which is less than the allowable differential
settlement of 274mm.
Settlement analyses are conducted to estimate the allowable load on various footing
sizes corresponding to 25mm settlement. The calculated safe bearing pressures without
considering settlement are much higher than the allowable footing pressure in Tables 5.3
and 5.4. Hence, the allowable footing pressure is governed by settlement.
Jack in concrete spun pile is recommended considering that the proposed development is
located within existing facilities. Installation of piles by means of impact driving will result
in the inevitable vibration. The vibrations may result in settlement or damage to adjacent

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 42 of 43
facility. Therefore, jacked-in pile which will cause lesser disturbances to the surrounding
environment is recommended.
Grade 80 Type B concrete spun pile is recommended. The allowable working loads in
compression and tension and the corresponding pile length for spun piles of varying
diameters are summarised in Tables 6.1 and 6.2. The load interaction curves (plots of
pile axial load versus allowable lateral capacity) for spun piles are presented in Appendix
H. The anticipated settlement of the piled foundation is less than 25mm.

Rev.0, 10/07/15
Page 43 of 43
10. References
[1] Robertson P.K. and Cabal K.L. (2009), “Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for
Geotechnical Engineering”.
[2] Boulanger R. W. and Idriss I. M. (2004), “Report No. USC/CGM-04/01, Evaluating

the Potential for Liquefaction or Cyclic Failure of Silts and Clays”, Centre for
Geotechnical Modelling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
University of California at Davis.
[3] Seed R.B., and Idriss I.M. (1971), “Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil
Liquefaction Potential”, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division,
ASCE, Vol.97, No.9, pp. 1249 – 1274.
[4] Seed R.B., Cetin K.O., Moss R.E.S., Kammerer A., Wu J., Pestana J., Riemer M.,
Sancio R.B., Bray J.D., Kayen R.E., and Faris A. (2003), "Recent Advances in Soil
Liquefaction Engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework", White Paper for
Keynote Presentation, 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring
Seminar, Long Beach.
[5] Robertson P.K. and Wride C.E. (1998), “Cyclic Liquefaction and Its Evaluation
Based on the CPT”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, August, 1998, Vol. 35.
[6] Bowles, Joseph E. (1997), “Foundation Analysis and Design”, McGraw-Hill

International Editions.

K-COT Area
Terminal 3 Area:
Toluene Tank
FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION PLAN

The real north direction shall be confirmed by the
surveyor by measuring using GPS equipment.
According to attachment of existing drawing, real
north is 50.5 degree.
A'
A
B B'
FIGURE 2A: K-COT AREA LAYOUT PLAN

FIGURE 2B: TERMINAL-3 AREA - TOLUENE TANK LAYOUT PLAN
SITE
LOCATION
FIGURE 3:4GEOLOGICAL
Figure MAP
: Geological Map
GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix A Borehole Logs

GEOLAB (M) SDN BHD (Reg. No : 210351-V) ENGINEERING LOG
Foundation, Soil & Concrete Specialists (Test Method BS5930: 1999)
Project : Soil Investigation Works For TE-3 Project In Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim. Borehole No. : BH-1
Pages 1 of 3
Customer : Messrs. GS Engineering & Construction Corp. Job No. : GLSB/SI/2824-036/2015
Date Started : 06/05/2015 Reduced Level : 4.463 m Coordinate, E : 317.259 Type of Boring : Rotary Boring
Date Completed : 06/05/2015 Final Depth : 27.25 m N: 289.976 Boring Diameter : 75mm to 125mm
Depth Sample Standard Penetration Test
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
& Sample Depth Recovery 75 75 75 75 75 75 'N' Remarks
(m) Lithology Ref. (m) Ratio mm mm mm mm mm mm Value
Top Soil- Light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. D1 0.00

to
Sand is medium grained. 0.30
P1/ 1.50 450/450 1 0 1 0 1 0 2

Soft, light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. Sand is
D2 to
medium grained. 1.95
UD1 500/700
Top: Light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. Sand
2.00
is medium to coarse grained. to
Bottom: Light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. 2.70
Sand is medium to coarse grained.
P2/ 3.00 400/450 1 0 1 1 1 1 4
Soft to firm, light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. D3 to
P3/ 4.50 300/450 1 0 1 1 2 2 6

D4 to
4.95
UD2 600/700
Top: Light brownish grey, sandy SILT. 5.00
Bottom: Light brownish grey, sandy SILT. to
5.70
P4/ 6.00 400/450 1 1 1 1 2 2 6

Firm, light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. Sand D5 to
is medium grained. 6.45
P5/ 7.50 400/450 1 1 2 2 1 2 7

D6 to
7.95
P6/ 9.00 400/450 2 2 3 4 5 5 17

Very stiff, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. D7 to
P7/ 10.50 350/450 2 3 4 5 6 6 21

D8 to
10.95
Water Observation Scale of Strength Legend

Date Time Depth Casing W.L Cohesive Soil Non-Cohesive : Wash Boring D : Disturbed Sample
06/05/2015 1730 27.25m 27.00m 0.71m 0-2 Very soft 0-4 Very loose : Split Spoon Sample UD : Undisturbed Sample
2-4 Soft 4 - 10 Loose : Thin Wall Tube Sample (UD) CL : Cored Length
4 -8 Firm 10 - 30 Medium dense : Piston Sample (Ps) TCR : Total Cored Recovery
8 - 15 Stiff 30 - 50 Dense : Maizer Sample (M) RQD : Rock Quality Designation
15 - 30 Very stiff > 50 Very dense : Rock Core Sample V : Vane Shear Test
> 30 Hard : Water Level (WL) Pm : Permeability Test
P : Standard Penetration Test Pr : Pressuremeter Test
*
Pages 2 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 300/450 2 3 4 5 6 5 20
P9/ 13.50 350/450 2 3 3 5 5 6 19

D10 to
13.95
P10/ 15.00 400/450 3 3 4 5 6 7 22

P11/ 16.50 350/450 3 4 5 5 6 6 22

D12 to
16.95
P12/ 18.00 400/450 3 4 6 6 6 8 26

18.45
P13/ 19.50 400/450 3 4 5 6 7 7 25

D14 to
19.95
P14/ 21.00 350/450 3 5 6 7 7 7 27

Very stiff, pale greyish brown, sandy SILT. D15 to
P15/ 22.50 250/400 5 8 10 16 16 8/ 50/

Hard, light greyish brown, sandy SILT. Sand is 25mm 250mm
D16 to

0-2 Very soft 0-4 Very loose : Split Spoon Sample UD : Undisturbed Sample
*
Pages 3 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P16/ 24.00 200/370 6 7 12 16 22/ 50/
Hard, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. Sand is 70mm
D17 to 220mm
fine grained. 24.37
P17/ 25.50 240/320 8 11 18 22 10/ 50/

D18 to 20mm 170mm
25.82
P18/ 27.00 200/250 9 13 26 24/ 50/

Hard, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. Sand is D19 to 25mm 100mm
fine grained. 27.25
END OF BH-1 AT 27.25 m

*
Pages 1 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
Top Soil- Light brownish grey, slightly sandy D1 0.00

to
CLAY. 0.30
P1/ 1.50 450/450 1 2 2 2 3 2 9

Stiff, light greyish brown, slightly sandy SILT. D2 to
1.95
UD1 500/700
Top: Light brownish grey, sandy SILT.
2.00
2.70
P2/ 3.00 400/450 1 2 2 3 3 3 11

Stiff, light brownish grey, slightly sandy SILT.
D3 to
3.45
P3/ 4.50 400/450 2 2 3 3 3 4 13

D4 to
4.95
P4/ 6.00 380/450 1 2 3 3 4 4 14

Stiff, light brownish grey, slightly sandy SILT. D5 to
6.45
P5/ 7.50 400/450 2 2 3 4 3 4 14

Stiff, light brownish grey, slightly sandy SILT.
D6 to
7.95
P6/ 9.00 350/450 2 3 4 4 3 4 15

Stiff to very stiff, light brownish grey, slightly D7 to
sandy CLAY. 9.45
P7/ 10.50 300/450 2 3 3 4 5 5 17

Very stiff, light brownish grey, slightly sandy D8 to
SILT. 10.95

*
Pages 2 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 400/450 2 3 4 4 5 4 17
Very stiff, pale brownish grey, sandy SILT.
D9 to
P9/ 13.50 400/450 2 3 4 5 4 5 18

Very stiff, light brownish grey, slightly sandy
D10 to
SILT. 13.95
P10/ 15.00 400/450 2 2 3 4 5 5 17

Very stiff, light brownish grey, sandy SILT.
D11 to
P11/ 16.50 400/450 2 2 4 4 5 5 18

D12 to
P12/ 18.00 200/370 5 8 12 19 19/ 50/

Hard, medium orangish light brown, sandy D13 to 70mm 220mm
SILT. 18.37
P13/ 19.50 190/360 6 9 12 18 20/ 50/

Hard, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. 60mm
D14 to 210mm
19.86
P14/ 21.00 180/310 10 13 17 21 12/ 50/

Hard, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. 10mm
D15 to 160mm
END OF BH-2 AT 21.31 m 21.31

*
Pages 1 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
Top Soil- Light greyish brown, sandy CLAY. D1 0.00

to
P1/ 1.50 400/450 2 1 2 2 2 2 8

Firm to stiff, light greyish brown, slightly sandy
D2 to
CLAY. Sand is medium grained. 1.95
UD1 600/700
Top: Light greyish brown, sandy CLAY. Sand
2.00
is medium grained. to
Bottom: Light greyish brown, sandy CLAY. 2.70
Sand is medium grained.
P2/ 3.00 400/450 1 1 2 1 1 1 5
P3/ 4.50 400/450 1 2 2 1 1 2 6

D4 to
4.95
P4/ 6.00 450/450 1 2 2 2 2 2 8

Firm to stiff, light brownish grey, slightly sandy D5 to
CLAY. 6.45
UD2 650/700
Top: Light brownish grey, slightly sandy 6.50
CLAY. to
7.20
Bottom: Light brownish grey, slightly sandy
CLAY. P5/ 7.50 350/450 1 2 2 3 4 3 12
Stiff, light brownish grey, slightly sandy SILT. D6 to
7.95
P6/ 9.00 400/450 2 2 2 3 4 6 15

D7 to
9.45
P7/ 10.50 400/450 2 2 2 3 5 3 13

Stiff, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. Sand is D8 to

*
Pages 2 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 400/450 2 2 3 4 4 3 14
Stiff, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. Sand is D9 to
P9/ 13.50 400/450 1 2 3 4 5 5 17

D10 to
SILT. 13.95
P10/ 15.00 300/450 2 3 4 5 5 4 18

D11 to
P11/ 16.50 300/450 2 3 4 5 6 6 21

16.95
P12/ 18.00 400/450 3 4 5 8 6 7 26

D13 to
P13/ 19.50 300/450 3 5 5 8 9 8 30

D14 to
19.95
P14/ 21.00 350/350 6 9 15 17 18/ 50/

fine grained. 21.35
P15/ 22.50 300/350 9 15 16 19 15/ 50/

D16 to 200mm
fine grained. 22.85

*
Pages 3 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P16/ 24.00 250/295 17 24 23 27/ 50/
fine grained. 24.30
P17/ 25.50 200/265 19 27 31 19/ 50/

D18 to 115mm
fine grained. 25.77

*
Pages 1 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
Top Soil- MADEGROUND comprising D1 0.00

to
concrete material. 0.20
P1/ 1.50 400/450 2 1 2 2 1 1 6

UD1 600/700
Top: Medium reddish brown with light yellow 2.00
mottled, sandy SILT. to
2.70
Bottom: Medium reddish brown with light
yellow mottled, sandy SILT. P2/ 3.00 400/450 2 2 2 1 2 2 7
Firm, medium reddish brown, sandy CLAY. D3 to
P3/ 4.50 450/450 2 2 2 2 2 2 8

Firm to stiff, medium reddish brown, sandy D4 to
SILT. 4.95
P4/ 6.00 400/450 2 2 3 3 4 4 14

Stiff, medium reddish brown with pale grey D5 to
mottled, sandy CLAY. Sand is medium grained. 6.45
P5/ 7.50 400/450 2 2 3 4 5 4 16

D6 to
7.95
P6/ 9.00 400/450 2 2 3 4 5 5 17

Very stiff, light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. D7 to
P7/ 10.50 400/450 2 3 4 4 5 6 19

10.95

*
Pages 2 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 350/450 2 3 5 5 6 5 21
Very stiff, medium reddish brown with medium D9 to
grey mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is medium 12.45
grained.
P9/ 13.50 350/450 3 4 5 6 6 7 24

Very stiff, medium reddish brown, sandy SILT.
D10 to
P10/ 15.00 350/450 3 5 6 7 7 8 28

D11 to
15.45
P11/ 16.50 300/450 5 4 6 7 8 10 31

Very stiff, light brownish grey with medium red D12 to
mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is medium grained. 16.95
P12/ 18.00 300/400 6 7 10 16 17 7/ 50/

Hard, medium reddish brown, sandy SILT. 25mm 250mm
D13 to
Sand is fine grained. 18.40
P13/ 19.50 250/350 6 8 16 20 14/ 50/

Hard, medium reddish brown with medium grey 50mm
D14 to 200mm
mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is fine grained. 19.85
P14/ 21.00 180/320 6 7 12 20 18/ 50/

D15 to 20mm 170mm
21.32
P15/ 22.50 240/250 10 13 26 24/ 50/

Hard, light brownish grey with medium red D16 to 25mm 100mm

*
Pages 1 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
Top Soil- MADEGROUND comprising asphalt D1 0.00

to
and gravel material. 0.30
P1/ 1.50 400/450 1 2 2 2 2 2 8

Firm to stiff, light brownish grey, slightly D2 to
gravelly slightly sandy SILT. 1.95
UD1 600/700
Top: Medium reddish brown with medium grey 2.00
mottled, slightly sandy CLAY. to
2.70
Bottom: Medium reddish brown with medium
grey mottled, sandy CLAY. P2/ 3.00 400/450 1 2 3 2 1 2 8
Firm to stiff, medium reddish brown with D3 to
medium grey and light yellow mottled, slightly 3.45
sandy CLAY.
P3/ 4.50 450/450 1 1 2 2 1 2 7

D4 to
4.95
P4/ 6.00 400/450 1 2 1 2 2 2 7

Firm, light brownish grey, slightly sandy SILT. D5 to
6.45
P5/ 7.50 400/450 1 2 3 4 5 5 17

D6 to
7.95
P6/ 9.00 350/450 2 2 3 4 4 6 17

and medium grey mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is 9.45
medium grained.
P7/ 10.50 350/450 2 3 4 4 5 5 18

D8 to
10.95

12/05/2015 1000 12.45m 12.00m 1.10m 2-4 Soft 4 - 10 Loose : Thin Wall Tube Sample (UD) CL : Cored Length
12/05/2015 1640 24.31m 24.00m 1.10m 4 -8 Firm 10 - 30 Medium dense : Piston Sample (Ps) TCR : Total Cored Recovery
*
Pages 2 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 300/450 2 3 4 5 6 5 20
mottled, slightly sandy CLAY. 12.45
P9/ 13.50 300/450 3 2 5 5 5 5 20

P10/ 15.00 400/450 2 3 3 4 5 5 17

D11 to
15.45
P11/ 16.50 380/450 3 5 4 5 4 6 19

Very stiff, medium orangish brown with D12 to
medium grey mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is 16.95
medium grained.
P12/ 18.00 310/450 4 6 8 7 9 11 35

Hard, pale greyish brown, sandy SILT. Sand is
D13 to
fine grained. 18.45
P13/ 19.50 350/400 4 7 10 14 16 10/ 50/

Hard, pale brown with medium red and medium 25mm 250mm
D14 to
grey mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is fine grained. 19.90
P14/ 21.00 220/370 5 8 12 18 20/ 50/

Hard, light brownish grey with medium red 70mm
D15 to 220mm
P15/ 22.50 200/340 5 8 12 16 22/ 50/

D16 to 40mm 190mm
22.84

*
Pages 3 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P16/ 24.00 200/310 7 10 15 20 15/ 50/
fine grained. 24.31

*
Pages 1 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L

to
P1/ 1.50 400/450 1 2 3 2 2 2 9

Stiff, medium reddish brown with medium grey D2 to
mottled, sandy CLAY. Sand is medium grained. 1.95
UD1 500/700
Top: Medium reddish brown, sandy CLAY. 2.00
Sand is medium grained. to
2.70
Bottom: Medium reddish brown, sandy CLAY.
Sand is medium grained. P2/ 3.00 350/450 2 2 3 2 2 3 10
Stiff, medium reddish brown, sandy CLAY. D3 to
P3/ 4.50 400/450 1 2 2 2 2 2 8

D4 to
4.95
UD2 600/700
Top: Light brownish grey, sandy SILT. 5.00
5.70
P4/ 6.00 350/450 2 1 2 3 5 3 13

Stiff, light brownish grey with light yellow
D5 to
mottled, slightly sandy SILT. 6.45
P5/ 7.50 400/450 2 2 3 3 4 4 14

D6 to
7.95
P6/ 9.00 400/450 2 3 3 3 3 4 13

Stiff, medium reddish brown with medium grey D7 to
mottled, slightly sandy SILT. 9.45
P7/ 10.50 350/450 2 3 5 4 5 5 19

Very stiff, medium reddish brown, slightly
D8 to
sandy SILT. 10.95

13/05/2015 0930 4.95m 4.50m 0.90m 2-4 Soft 4 - 10 Loose : Thin Wall Tube Sample (UD) CL : Cored Length
13/05/2015 1720 19.70m 19.50m 1.30m 4 -8 Firm 10 - 30 Medium dense : Piston Sample (Ps) TCR : Total Cored Recovery
*
Pages 2 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 400/450 2 3 4 4 4 5 17
Very stiff, medium reddish brown, slightly D9 to
sandy SILT. 12.45
P9/ 13.50 210/450 2 4 6 7 8 8 29

Medium dense, pale grey, SAND. Sand is D10 to
medium to coarse grained. 13.95
P10/ 15.00 220/400 4 6 8 13 16 13/ 50/

Very dense, pale grey, slightly gravelly SAND. D11 to 25mm 250mm
15.40
P11/ 16.50 210/340 6 10 17 20 13/ 50/

D12 to 40mm 190mm
16.84
P12/ 18.00 180/250 7 11 23 27/ 50/

Very dense, pale grey, slightly gravelly SAND. D13 to 25mm 100mm
18.25
P13/ 19.50 170/200 10 11 50/ 50/50mm

D14 to 50mm
END OF BH-6 AT 19.70 m 19.70

*
Pages 1 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
Top Soil- Dark brownish grey, CLAY. D1 0.00

to
0.30
P1/ 1.50 450/450 1 2 1 2 2 1 6

UD1 600/700
Top: Light brownish grey with medium red 2.00
mottled, sandy SILT. to
2.70
Bottom: Light brownish grey with medium red
mottled, sandy SILT. P2/ 3.00 350/450 1 2 2 2 2 2 8
Firm to stiff, medium reddish brown with D3 to
medium grey mottled, sandy CLAY. 3.45
P3/ 4.50 350/450 2 2 3 3 2 3 11

Stiff, light brownish grey with medium red
D4 to
mottled, slightly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine 4.95
grained.
P4/ 6.00 370/450 2 2 2 4 3 4 13

Stiff, light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. Sand
D5 to
P5/ 7.50 350/450 2 2 3 3 4 3 13

D6 to
7.95
UD2 NIL/500
No recovery. 8.00
to
8.50
P6/ 9.00 400/450 2 3 3 4 5 5 17

mottled, slightly sandy CLAY. Sand is fine 9.45
grained.
P7/ 10.50 360/450 2 3 4 4 5 4 17

D8 to
CLAY. Sand is fine grained. 10.95

*
Pages 2 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 320/450 3 2 3 4 5 6 18
12.45
P9/ 13.50 400/450 3 3 4 5 6 6 21

D10 to
13.95
P10/ 15.00 350/450 3 2 4 5 6 5 20

mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is medium grained. 15.45
P11/ 16.50 400/450 3 4 5 6 6 6 23

D12 to
16.95
P12/ 18.00 300/400 4 7 10 12 18 10/ 50/

P13/ 19.50 200/370 6 9 16 18 16/ 50/

D14 to 220mm
P14/ 21.00 200/305 8 10 15 25 10/ 50/

Hard, pale brownish grey, gravelly sandy SILT. 5mm
D15 to 155mm
P15/ 22.50 100/200 10 13 50/ 50/50mm

D16 to

*
Pages 1 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L

to
P1/ 1.50 400/450 2 1 2 2 1 2 7

Firm, light brownish grey, slightly gravelly D2 to
CLAY. 1.95
UD1 600/700
Top: Light brownish grey, slightly sandy 2.00
CLAY. to
2.70
Bottom: Light brownish grey, slightly sandy
CLAY. P2/ 3.00 400/450 1 1 2 2 2 2 8
Firm to stiff, light brownish grey with medium D3 to
red mottled, sandy CLAY. Sand is medium 3.45
grained.
P3/ 4.50 400/450 1 2 2 1 2 3 8

D4 to
4.95
P4/ 6.00 280/450 1 2 2 1 2 2 7

Firm, pale greyish brown, sandy CLAY with D5 to
some organic matter. Sand is medium grained. 6.45
UD2 NIL/700
No recovery. 6.50
to
7.20
P5/ 7.50 400/450 2 1 2 3 3 2 10

Stiff, light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. Sand D6 to
P6/ 9.00 400/450 2 2 2 3 3 3 11

Stiff, light greyish brown, sandy CLAY.
D7 to
9.45
P7/ 10.50 400/450 2 2 3 4 3 3 13

D8 to
10.95

*
Pages 2 of 2
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 300/450 2 3 3 4 4 3 14
Stiff, light greyish yellow, sandy SILT. Sand is D9 to
P9/ 13.50 370/450 2 3 4 5 5 6 20

D10 to
P10/ 15.00 400/450 2 4 5 5 6 8 24

D11 to
15.45
P11/ 16.50 310/450 3 5 6 7 10 10 33

Hard, medium orangish brown, sandy SILT. D12 to
P12/ 18.00 300/400 4 8 10 12 16 12/ 50/

Hard, pale grey, sandy SILT. Sand is medium 25mm 250mm
D13 to
to coarse grained. 18.40
P13/ 19.50 220/310 5 9 12 16 22/ 50/

Hard, pale grey, sandy SILT. Sand is fine 10mm
D14 to 160mm
grained. 19.81
P14/ 21.00 200/305 6 9 16 21 13/ 50/

D15 to 5mm 155mm
21.31
P15/ 22.50 180/300 6 11 27 23 50/

Hard, light grey, sandy SILT. Sand is fine D16 to 150mm
grained. 22.80

*
Pages 1 of 3
Date Completed : 24/05/2015 Final Depth : 28.80 m N: -193.996 Boring Diameter : 75mm to 125mm
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
Top Soil- Light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. D1 0.00

to
P1/ 1.50 400/450 1 2 2 2 1 2 7

Firm, light brownish grey, sandy CLAY. Sand
D2 to
UD1 300/700
Top: Light brownish grey, CLAY. 2.00
Bottom: Light brownish grey, CLAY. to
2.70
P2/ 3.00 400/450 1 2 2 1 2 1 6

Firm, light brownish grey with medium red D3 to
mottled, slightly sandy CLAY. 3.45
P3/ 4.50 350/450 1 2 1 2 2 2 7

D4 to
4.95
P4/ 6.00 400/450 1 2 1 2 2 2 7

Firm, pale greyish brown, sandy CLAY. Sand is D5 to
P5/ 7.50 400/450 1 2 2 2 2 2 8

D6 to
7.95
P6/ 9.00 400/450 1 2 2 2 4 4 12

Stiff, light greyish brown, slightly sandy SILT. D7 to
9.45
P7/ 10.50 400/450 1 2 3 4 4 4 15

D8 to
10.95

*
Pages 2 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P8/ 12.00 400/450 2 3 3 3 4 4 14
Stiff, pale grey, sandy SILT. Sand is medium D9 to
grained. 12.45
P9/ 13.50 350/450 2 3 4 5 4 6 19

D10 to
P10/ 15.00 370/450 2 3 4 5 6 6 21

D11 to
15.45
P11/ 16.50 400/450 2 3 4 6 6 6 22

Very stiff, medium orangish brown, sandy D12 to
CLAY. 16.95
P12/ 18.00 400/450 3 4 5 5 6 7 23

D13 to
18.45
P13/ 19.50 360/450 2 3 5 6 7 8 26

Very stiff, medium orangish brown, sandy D14 to
SILT. Sand is medium grained. 19.95
P14/ 21.00 400/450 3 3 4 6 8 7 25

Very stiff, medium orangish brown with
D15 to
medium grey mottled, sandy SILT. Sand is 21.45
medium grained.
P15/ 22.50 400/450 2 5 6 7 6 8 27

D16 to
22.95

*
Pages 3 of 3
Legend
Soil Description
From
R.L
P16/ 24.00 300/450 5 6 7 10 13 20/ 50/
P17/ 25.50 210/370 6 8 12 16 22/ 50/

D18 to 70mm 220mm
25.87
P18/ 27.00 220/310 6 10 16 20 14/ 50/

P19/ 28.50 200/305 7 9 19 24 7/5mm 50/

Hard, light brownish grey, sandy SILT. Sand is
D20 to 155mm

*
APPENDIX C
Permeability Test Results
Foundation, Soil & Concrete Specialists

VAIRABLE HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST
TEST METHOD BS 5930:1999 - CODE OF PRACTICE FOR SOIL INVESTIGATION
SECTION 4 - FIELD TEST, 25.4 PERMEABILITY
PROJECT : Soil Investigation Works For TE-3 Project In Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim.
CLIENT : Messrs. GS Engineering & Construction Corp.

COMSULTANT :
LOCATION : Pasir Gudang, Johor.
DEPTH BELOW TOP OF CASING/STANDPIPE
BOREHOLE NO. : BH6 TESTED DEPTH : 6 m
TEST NO. : 1 CASING DEPTH : 5.5 m
TESTED DATE : 16-05-15 GROUND WATER LEVEL : 0.7 m
CASING/STAND PIPE INFORMATION

CASING ABOVE G.L : 0.5 m
CASING DIAMETER : 75 mm
OPEN HOLE DIAMETER : 75 mm
BASIC TIME FACTOR, T : 4.5 min
FIELD DATA: GRAPH: SKETCH:
Time Time Water Depth H=
on Elapsed From Casing Ho - DH H/Ho DH
1.00
Clock (min) Top, DH (m) (m) G.L
11:30:00 0 0.000 0.70 1.00
Ho
11:31:00 1 0.000 0.70 1.00 H
11:32:00 2 0.400 0.30 0.43 T=
11:33:00 3 0.400 0.30 0.43 4.5min
0.37
11:34:00 4 0.400 0.30 0.43
11:35:00 5 0.500 0.20 0.29 G.W.L
11:40:00 10 0.500 0.20 0.29
11:45:00 15 0.600 0.10 0.14
11:50:00 20 0.600 0.10 0.14
11:55:00 25 0.600 0.10 0.14
12:00:00 30 0.600 0.10 0.14
12:05:00 35 0.600 0.10 0.14 0.10
12:10:00 40 0.600 0.10 0.14

12:15:00 45 0.700 0.00 0.00
12:20:00 50 0.700 0.00 0.00
12:25:00 55 0.700 0.00 0.00
H / Ho
12:30:00 60 0.700 0.00 0.00

12:45:00 75 0.700 0.00 0.00
13:00:00 90 1.340 -0.64 -0.91 L
13:15:00 105 1.350 -0.65 -0.93
13:30:00 120 1.350 -0.65 -0.93
D
0.01
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time (min)
Geolab (M) Sdn. Bhd.

Foundation, Soil, Concrete Specialsts

COMSULTANT :

BASIC TIME FACTOR, T : 44 min
1.00
15:00:00 0 0.000 0.90 1.00
Ho
15:01:00 1 0.010 0.89 0.99 H
15:02:00 2 0.040 0.86 0.96 T=
15:03:00 3 0.040 0.86 0.96 44.0min
0.37
15:04:00 4 0.050 0.85 0.94
15:05:00 5 0.070 0.83 0.92 G.W.L
15:10:00 10 0.100 0.80 0.89
15:15:00 15 0.150 0.75 0.83
15:20:00 20 0.200 0.70 0.78
15:25:00 25 0.300 0.60 0.67
15:30:00 30 0.400 0.50 0.56
15:35:00 35 0.400 0.50 0.56 0.10
15:40:00 40 0.400 0.50 0.56

15:45:00 45 0.600 0.30 0.33
15:50:00 50 0.600 0.30 0.33
15:55:00 55 0.700 0.20 0.22
H / Ho
16:00:00 60 0.700 0.20 0.22

16:15:00 75 0.700 0.20 0.22
16:30:00 90 0.800 0.10 0.11 L
16:45:00 105 0.800 0.10 0.11
17:00:00 120 0.900 0.00 0.00
17:10:00 130 0.900 0.00 0.00 D
17:20:00 140 0.900 0.00 0.00
0.01
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (min)


COMSULTANT :

BASIC TIME FACTOR, T : 37 min
1.00
11:30:00 0 0.000 3.10 1.00
Ho
11:31:00 1 0.600 2.50 0.81 H
11:32:00 2 0.700 2.40 0.77 T=
11:33:00 3 0.900 2.20 0.71 37.0min
0.37
11:34:00 4 1.000 2.10 0.68
11:35:00 5 1.000 2.10 0.68 G.W.L
11:40:00 10 1.000 2.10 0.68
11:45:00 15 1.200 1.90 0.61
11:50:00 20 1.200 1.90 0.61
11:55:00 25 1.200 1.90 0.61
12:00:00 30 1.600 1.50 0.48
12:05:00 35 1.900 1.20 0.39 0.10
12:10:00 40 2.000 1.10 0.35

12:15:00 45 2.100 1.00 0.32
12:20:00 50 2.200 0.90 0.29
12:25:00 55 2.600 0.50 0.16
H / Ho
12:30:00 60 2.700 0.40 0.13

12:45:00 75 2.900 0.20 0.06
13:00:00 90 3.000 0.10 0.03 L
13:15:00 105 3.000 0.10 0.03
13:30:00 120 3.100 0.00 0.00
13:40:00 130 3.100 0.00 0.00 D
13:50:00 140 3.100 0.00 0.00
0.01
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (min)

APPENDIX D
Pressuremeter Test Results

PRESSUREMETER TEST RESULTS GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD.
Client : GS Engineering & Construction Corp. Gauge Height : 0.6m Operator : Tajuddin / Iwan
Project : Soil Investigation Works for TE-3 Project In Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim. Probe : BX (58 mm)
Borehole : BH 9 Date Tested : 24/05/2015 Ground Level : - Method of testing : ASTM : D 4719
Test depth : 6.0 - 7.0 m
* Volume (cm3) 800 80

Membrane Pressure Corrected Reading Reading Reading
Resistance Pressure 15 30 60 Creep Diff. 750 75
(bar) (bar) (bar) second second second 60s-30s 700 70
0.17 0.00 -0.11 30 30 30
0.53 0.25 -0.22 60 68 78 10 48 650 65
0.64 0.50 -0.08 95 100 105 5 27
0.74 0.75 0.07 120 125 132 7 27 600 60
0.82 1.00 0.24 143 149 156 7 24
550 55
0.86 1.25 0.45 165 170 175 5 19
0.92 1.50 0.64 178 184 192 8 17 500 50
0.96 1.75 0.85 198 202 208 6 16
450 45
Volume (cm3)
1.12 2.00 0.94 211 213 217 4 9
Creep (cm3)
1.04 2.25 1.27 229 233 237 4 20
400 40
1.10 2.50 1.46 243 246 250 4 13
1.13 2.75 1.68 259 260 262 2 12 350 v02 vf2 35
1.14 3.00 1.92 269 270 272 2 10
1.18 3.25 2.13 284 286 288 2 16 300 30
1.22 3.50 2.34 306 308 311 3 23 vf
250 25
1.21 3.25 2.10 309 309 309 0 -2
1.20 3.00 1.86 306 306 306 0 -3 200 20
1.19 2.75 1.62 303 303 303 0 -3 v0
1.18 2.50 1.38 300 300 300 0 -3 150 15
1.19 2.75 1.62 303 303 303 0 3
100 10
1.20 3.00 1.86 306 306 306 0 3
1.21 3.25 2.10 309 309 309 0 3 50 5
1.24 3.50 2.32 311 312 313 1 4
1.26 3.75 2.55 325 330 336 6 23 0 0
1.30 4.00 2.76 346 350 357 7 21 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
1.39 4.50 3.17 402 410 419 9 62 Corrected Pressure (bar)
1.55 5.00 3.51 476 484 495 11 76
1.70 5.50 3.86 566 578 590 12 95 Log-volume Vs Pressure (Wilson 1988) v0 = 208 cm3 v02 = 300 cm3
10000 vf = 288 cm3 vf2 = 313 cm3
p0 = 0.85 bar p02 = 1.38
pf = 2.13 bar pf2 = 2.32
Vc = 535 cm3 (Initial volume of measuring cell)
y = 99.484e0.4587x
VL = 2 v0 + Vc (Injected volume at the limit pressure)
1000 VL = 951 cc VL = 951 cm3
VL > maximum injected volume
Therefore, PL, limit pressure need to extrapolate fr Log-vol vs Pr Graph
Dp Dp
EPMT = 2 (1 + ns) V =K
Dv Dv
100 EPMT = Deformation modulus (Pressuremeter Test)
ns = Poission's ratio = 0.33
V = Cavity volume during pseudo-elastic phase = Vc + vm
vm = Mean volume of pseudo-elastic phase = (vo + vf)/2
10
Dp Dv PL K EPMT
Cycle
(bar) (cm3) (bar) (cm3) (bar)
First 1.28 80 2083 33.3

PL = 4.92 bar 4.92
1
Second 0.94 13 2238 161.9
Remarks : * Plus Hydrostatic Pressure of 0.06 bar. 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00
PRESSUREMETER TEST RESULTS GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD.
Client : GS Engineering & Construction Corp. Gauge Height : 0.6m Operator : Tajuddin / Iwan
Project : Soil Investigation Works for TE-3 Project In Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim. Probe : BX (58 mm)
Borehole : BH 9 Date Tested : 24/05/2015 Ground Level : - Method of testing : ASTM : D 4719
Test depth : 12.0 - 13.0 m
* Volume (cm3) 800 80

Membrane Pressure Corrected Reading Reading Reading
Resistance Pressure 15 30 60 Creep Diff. 750 75
(bar) (bar) (bar) second second second 60s-30s 700 70
0.12 0.00 -0.06 20 20 20
0.53 0.25 -0.22 68 72 76 4 56 650 65
0.63 0.50 -0.07 91 96 100 4 24
0.70 1.00 0.36 119 122 125 3 25 600 60
0.81 1.50 0.75 144 147 150 3 25
550 55
0.85 2.00 1.21 169 171 175 4 25
1.01 3.00 2.05 218 221 225 4 50 500 50
1.10 4.00 2.96 247 250 255 5 30
450 45
Volume (cm3)
1.21 5.00 3.85 291 295 300 5 45
Creep (cm3)
1.21 4.00 2.85 300 300 300 0 0
400 40
1.20 3.00 1.86 229 299 299 0 -1
1.19 2.00 0.87 298 298 298 0 -1 350 35
v02 vf2
1.18 1.50 0.38 297 297 297 0 -1
1.19 2.00 0.87 298 298 298 0 1 300 30
1.20 3.00 1.86 299 299 299 0 1 vf
250 25
1.21 4.00 2.85 300 300 300 0 1
1.25 5.00 3.81 305 306 307 1 7 200 20
1.29 6.00 4.77 325 331 340 9 33
1.38 7.00 5.68 380 388 398 10 58 150 15
1.44 8.00 6.62 426 435 445 10 47 v0
100 10
1.54 9.00 7.52 476 485 496 11 51
1.65 10.00 8.41 547 558 570 12 74 50 5
1.81 11.00 9.25 642 656 672 16 102
0 0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Corrected Pressure (bar)
Log-volume Vs Pressure (Wilson 1988) v0 = 150 cm3 v02 = 297 cm3

10000 vf = 300 cm3 vf2 = 300 cm3
p0 = 0.75 bar p02 = 0.38
pf = 3.85 bar pf2 = 2.85
Vc = 535 cm3 (Initial volume of measuring cell)
y = 155.49e0.1564x VL = 2 v0 + Vc (Injected volume at the limit pressure)
1000 VL = 835 cc VL = 835 cm3
VL > maximum injected volume
Therefore, PL, limit pressure need to extrapolate fr Log-vol vs Pr Graph
Dp Dp
EPMT = 2 (1 + ns) V =K
Dv Dv
100 EPMT = Deformation modulus (Pressuremeter Test)
ns = Poission's ratio = 0.33
V = Cavity volume during pseudo-elastic phase = Vc + vm
vm = Mean volume of pseudo-elastic phase = (vo + vf)/2
10
Dp Dv PL K EPMT
Cycle
(bar) (cm3) (bar) (cm3) (bar)
First 3.10 150 2022 41.8

PL = 10.75
10.75
1 bar
Second 2.47 3 2217 1825.4
Remarks : * Plus Hydrostatic Pressure of 0.06 bar. 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00
APPENDIX E
Down-hole Velocity Logging Result

Time (msec)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Depth (m)
10
11
12
P wave form DH1

Time (msec)
50 100
Depth (m)
10
11
12
S wave form DH1

P wave S wave Time (msec)
(m/s) (m/s)
40 80 120 160
Depth (m)
1200
400
1400 460
10
1700 560
12
S wave & P wave travel time DH1

Downhole PS Logging Result DH1 1.0m interval Page 1 of 1
Remark: Refer to BH-1
P wave S Wave Input Parameters Derived Dynamic Parameters SPT RQD Geological
Depth Velocity Velocity g r Rigidity Modulus, G n Young's Modulus,E N-Value (%) Profile
GL-(m) (m/s) (m/s) m/s2 (g/cm3) kgf/cm2 GPa Poisson's kgf/cm2 GPa (Depth,m)
0.00 1200 400 9.81 1.6 2609.58 0.256 0.438 7,502.55 0.736 CLAY with sand
1.00 1200 400 9.81 1.6 2609.58 0.256 0.438 7,502.55 0.736 2 Soft CLAY with sand
2.00 1200 400 9.81 1.6 2609.58 0.256 0.438 7,502.55 0.736 Ditto
3.00 1200 400 9.81 1.6 2,609.58 0.256 0.438 7,502.55 0.736 4 Ditto
4.00 1200 400 9.81 1.6 2,609.58 0.256 0.438 7,502.55 0.736 6 Ditto
5.00 1200 400 9.81 1.6 2,609.58 0.256 0.438 7,502.55 0.736 Ditto
6.00 1400 460 9.81 1.6 3,451.17 0.338 0.439 9,935.84 0.974 6 Stiff CLAY with sand
7.00 1400 460 9.81 1.6 3,451.17 0.338 0.439 9,935.84 0.974 7 Ditto
8.00 1400 460 9.81 1.6 3,451.17 0.338 0.439 9,935.84 0.974
9.00 1400 460 9.81 1.6 3,451.17 0.338 0.439 9,935.84 0.974 17 Stiff SILT with sand
10.00 1700 560 9.81 1.6 5,114.78 0.502 0.439 14,721.77 1.444 21 Ditto
11.00 1700 560 9.81 1.6 5,114.78 0.502 0.439 14,721.77 1.444
12.00 1700 560 9.81 1.6 5,114.78 0.502 0.439 14,721.77 1.444 20 Very stiff SILT with sand
Remarks: Refer to BH-1
Analysis Result of Downhole PS-Logging DH1 1.0m interval
Project Name: SI Works For TE-3 Project in Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim. BH No.: DH1
Page 1 of 1
Depth Soil Column P-Wave and S-Wave Velocity
(m) Symbol ( : G.L) N-Value (m/sec) Elastic Constant
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

__ 0
0 0
_ 0.00 –– CLAY with sand
_ –
_
_
__ 1 1 1 Poisson' s Ratio,
_
_ u : 0.44
_ ––
_ 1.50 – Soft CLAY with sand
Vp: 1200m/s
__ 2 –– Rigidity,
Vs: 400m/s
2 2
_ – G: 2610 kgf/cm2
_ 2.00 –– Ditto
_ –
_ Young's Modulus,
__ 3 3 3
E: 7503 kgf/cm2
_ ––
_ 3.00 – Ditto
_
(Assume ρ: 1.6 g/cm3)
_
__ 4 4 4
_
_
_ ––
_ 4.50 – Ditto
__ 5 –– 5 5
_ –
_ 5.00 –– Ditto
_ –
_
__ 6 6 6
Poisson' s Ratio,
_
6.00 ––
Stiff CLAY with sand u : 0.44
_ –
_
Vp: 1400m/s
Vs: 460m/s
_ Rigidity,
__ 7 7 7 G: 3451 kgf/cm2
_
_
_ –– Young's Modulus,
_ 7.50 – Ditto E: 9936 kgf/cm2
__ 8 –– 8 8
_
_ (Assume ρ: 1.6 g/cm3)
_
_
__ 9 9 9
_ x x x
_
9.00 x x
Stiff SILT with sand
_ Poisson' s Ratio,
_
u : 0.44
Vp: 1700m/s
__ 10
Vs: 560m/s
10 10
_
_
_ x x x
Rigidity,
_ 10.50 x x Ditto G: 5115 kgf/cm2
__ 11 x x x
11 11
_ Young's Modulus,
_
_ E: 14722 kgf/cm2
_
__ 12 12 12 (Assume ρ: 1.6 g/cm3)
_ 12.00 x x x
_ x x
Very stiff SILT with sand
_
End of Downhole Test
_
__ 13 13 13
_
_
_
_
__ 14 14 14
_
_
_
_
__ 15 15 15
_
_
_
_
__ 16 16 16
_
_
_
_
__ 17
17 17
_
_
_
_
__ 18 18 18
_
_
_
_
__ 19 19 19
_
_
_
_
__ 20 20 20
Time (msec)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Depth (m)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
P wave form DH2

Time (msec)
50 100
Depth (m)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
S wave form DH2

P wave S wave Time (msec)
(m/s) (m/s)
40 80 120 160
Depth (m)
1300 430
4
10
1600 530
12
14
16
1800 590
18
S wave & P wave travel time DH2

Downhole PS Logging Result DH2 1.0m interval Page 1 of 1
Remark: Refer to BH-5
P wave S Wave Input Parameters Derived Dynamic Parameters SPT RQD Geological
Depth Velocity Velocity g r Rigidity Modulus, G n Young's Modulus,E N-Value (%) Profile
GL-(m) (m/s) (m/s) m/s2 (g/cm3) kgf/cm2 GPa Poisson's kgf/cm2 GPa (Depth,m)
0.00 1300 430 9.81 1.6 3015.70 0.296 0.439 8,676.62 0.851 Top soil
1.00 1300 430 9.81 1.6 3015.70 0.296 0.439 8,676.62 0.851 8 Stiff SILT with traces of sand and gravel
2.00 1300 430 9.81 1.6 3015.70 0.296 0.439 8,676.62 0.851 CLAY with traces of sand
3.00 1300 430 9.81 1.6 3,015.70 0.296 0.439 8,676.62 0.851 8 Stiff CLAY with traces of sand
4.00 1300 430 9.81 1.6 3,015.70 0.296 0.439 8,676.62 0.851 7 Ditto
5.00 1300 430 9.81 1.6 3,015.70 0.296 0.439 8,676.62 0.851
6.00 1300 430 9.81 1.6 3,015.70 0.296 0.439 8,676.62 0.851 7 Stiff SILT with traces of sand
7.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292 17 Ditto
8.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292
9.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292 17 Very stiff SILT with sand
10.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292 18 Ditto
11.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292
12.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292 20 Ditto
13.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292 20 Ditto
14.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292
15.00 1600 530 9.81 1.6 4,581.45 0.449 0.438 13,179.68 1.292 17 Ditto
16.00 1800 570 9.81 1.6 5,299.08 0.520 0.444 15,306.64 1.501 19 Ditto
17.00 1800 570 9.81 1.6 5,299.08 0.520 0.444 15,306.64 1.501
18.00 1800 570 9.81 1.6 5,299.08 0.520 0.444 15,306.64 1.501 35 Hard SILT with sand
Remarks: Refer to BH-5
Analysis Result of Downhole PS-Logging DH2 1.0m interval
Project Name: SI Works For TE-3 Project in Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim. BH No.: DH2
Page 1 of 1
Depth Soil Column P-Wave and S-Wave Velocity
(m) Symbol ( : G.L) N-Value (m/sec) Elastic Constant
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

__ 0
0 0
_ 0.00 Top soil
_
_
_
__ 1 1 1
_
_
_ x x x Stiff SILT with traces of sand and Poisson' s Ratio,
_
__ 2
1.50 x x
x x x
gravel u : 0.44
2 2
_ ––
Vp: 1300m/s
_ 2.00 – CLAY with traces of sand Rigidity,
Vs: 430m/s
_ –– G: 3016 kgf/cm2
_
__ 3 3 3
_ –– Young's Modulus,
_ 3.00 – Stiff CLAY with traces of sand
E: 8677 kgf/cm2
_
_
__ 4 4
(Assume ρ: 1.6 g/cm3)
4
_
_
_ ––
_ 4.50 – Ditto
__ 5 –– 5 5
_
_
_
_
__ 6 6 6
_ x x x
_ 6.00 x x
Stiff SILT with traces of sand
_
_
__ 7 7 7
_
_
_ x x x
_ 7.50 x x Ditto
__ 8 8 8
_
_
_
_
__ 9 9 9
_ x x x
Poisson' s Ratio,
_
9.00 x x
Very stiff SILT with sand u : 0.44
_
_
__ 10 Rigidity,
10 10
_ G: 4581 kgf/cm2
Vp: 1600m/s
Vs: 530m/s
_
_ x x x
_ 10.50 x x Ditto
Young's Modulus,
__ 11 11 11
E: 13180 kgf/cm2
_
_
_
__ 12 12 12
_ 12.00 x x x
_ x x
Ditto
_
_
__ 13 13 13
_
_
_ x x x
_ 13.50 x x Ditto
__ 14 14 14
_
_
_
_
__ 15 15 15
_ x x x
_ 15.00 x x
Ditto
Poisson' s Ratio,
_
_ u : 0.44
__ 16 16 16
_ Rigidity,
Vp: 1800m/s
_
Vs: 570m/s
_ x x x G: 5299 kgf/cm2
_ 16.50 x x Ditto
__ 17 17 Young's Modulus,
17
_
_ E: 15307 kgf/cm2
_
__ 18 18 18
_ x x x
_
18.00 x x
Hard SILT with sand
_ End of Downhole Test
_
__ 19 19 19
_
_
_
_
__ 20 20 20
GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix B Summary of Laboratory Test Results

GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. (Reg. No.210351-V)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Foundation. Soil & Concrete Specialists
Project : Soil Investigation Works for TE-3 Project In Pasir Gudang Customer : M/S GS Engineering & Construction Corp.
Job No : GLSB/SI/ 2824-036 /2015
Date : 23-Jun-15
MARKING CLASSIFICATION TEST SOIL STRENGTH TEST COMPRESSIBILITY TEST ROCK TEST CHEMICAL TEST
Compression Test
Moisture Content
Depth Particle Size Distribution Atterberg Limit Triaxial Compression Test 1-D Consolidation Test
Chloride Content
Sulphate Content
Organic Content
Linear Shinkage
Specific Gravity
Point Load Test

Bulk Density
Dry Density
Uniaxial
Borehole No.
Plastic Index
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Void Pre-con. Comp.
Sample No.
UU CU CD
pH
Gravel
Ratio Pressure Index
Sand
Clay
Silt
From To
C  Cu  Cd  e Pc Cc
3
metre % Mg/m Mg/m3 % % % % % % % % 2 2 2
kN/m deg. kN/m deg. kN/m deg. kN/m
2
MPa MPa % % %
BH 1 UD1 2.00 2.70 31 40.4 0

UD2 5.00 5.70 27 2.66 0 42 32 26 44 29 15 0.861 395.0 0.283 4.9 0.04 <0.01
SPT12 18.00 18.45 29 2.63 0 57 15 28 64 40 24
BH 2 UD1 2.00 2.70 30 0 41 24 35 60 40 20 109.6 0 4.9 0.02 <0.01

SPT6 9.00 9.45 47 2.65 0 8 46 46 58 28 30
SPT10 18.00 18.45 24 2.65 0 55 28 17 50 31 19
BH 3 UD1 2.00 2.70 52 39.7 0

UD2 6.50 7.20 36 2.61 0 34 25 41 46 23 23 0.674 230.0 0.181
SPT11 16.50 16.95 34 2.64 0 54 24 22 56 35 21
BH 4 UD1 2.00 2.70 30 2.64 0 45 24 31 61 40 21 0.824 385.0 0.280

SPT3 4.50 4.95 40 2.65 0 44 23 33 66 42 24
SPT7 10.50 10.90 31 2.67 0 42 27 31 62 41 21
BH 5 UD1 2.00 2.70 31 0 48 23 29 39 25 14 44.4 0 4.8 0.03 <0.01

SPT8 12.00 12.45 50 2.66 0 6 64 30 59 26 33
NOTE; NP : NON-PLASTIC NES : NOT ENOUGH SAMPLE NA : NOT APPLICABLE * TESTING IN PROGRESS
Prepared By : Checked By:

(Siti Zalipah Jumary) (Nurasila Roslan)
Eng. Geologist Eng. Geologist
GEOLAB (M) SDN. BHD. (Reg. No.210351-V)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Foundation. Soil & Concrete Specialists
Project : Soil Investigation Works for TE-3 Project In Pasir Gudang Customer : M/S GS Engineering & Construction Corp.
Job No : GLSB/SI/ 2824-036 /2015
Date : 23-Jun-15
MARKING CLASSIFICATION TEST SOIL STRENGTH TEST COMPRESSIBILITY TEST ROCK TEST CHEMICAL TEST
Compression Test
Moisture Content
Depth Particle Size Distribution Atterberg Limit Triaxial Compression Test 1-D Consolidation Test
Chloride Content
Sulphate Content
Organic Content
Linear Shinkage
Specific Gravity
Point Load Test

Bulk Density
Dry Density
Uniaxial
Borehole No.
Plastic Index
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Void Pre-con. Comp.
Sample No.
UU CU CD
pH
Gravel
Ratio Pressure Index
Sand
Clay
Silt
From To
C  Cu  Cd  e Pc Cc
3
Mg/m3
2 2 2 2
metre % Mg/m % % % % % % % % kN/m deg. kN/m deg. kN/m deg. kN/m MPa MPa % % %
BH 6 UD1 2.00 2.70 52 51.5 0

UD2 5.00 5.70 31 2.56 0 38 26 36 74 38 36 0.682 495.0 0.200
SPT7 10.50 10.95 49 2.67 0 7 64 29 61 33 28
BH 7 UD1 2.00 2.70 29 2.63 0 46 30 24 61 41 20 0.835 250.0 0.257

SPT2 3.00 3.45 31 2.66 0 42 22 36 42 25 17
SPT8 12.00 12.45 29 2.64 0 55 27 18 43 28 15
BH 8 UD1 2.00 2.70 32 0 29 20 51 47 27 20 75.6 0 4.5 0.03 <0.01

SPT6 9.00 9.45 20 2.63 0 55 14 31 47 18 29
SPT9 13.50 13.95 28 2.62 0 58 23 19 56 38 18
BH 9 UD1 2.00 2.70 29 2.60 0 42 32 26 0 0.543 420.0 0.130 4.8 0.06 0.01
SPT2 3.00 3.45 30 2.64 0 11 19 70 62 18 44
SPT6 9.00 9.45 38 2.61 0 28 23 49 42 27 15
SPT11 16.50 16.95 30 2.64 0 38 33 29 39 22 17
NOTE; NP : NON-PLASTIC NES : NOT ENOUGH SAMPLE NA : NOT APPLICABLE * TESTING IN PROGRESS
Prepared By : Checked By:

(Siti Zalipah Jumary) (Nurasila Roslan)
Eng. Geologist Eng. Geologist
One Dimensional
Consolidation Test

Borehole No.: BH 1
Client: M/s. Lotte Chemical Titan (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Sample No.: UD 2
Location: TE-3 Project, Pasir Gudang, Johor
Depth: 5.00-5.70m
Report No.: GLSB/SI/2824-036/2015 Test Name: Consol 15 Date of test: 03/06/15
One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soil

Incremental Loading
(ASTM D2435/D2435M - 11) Summary Report
Sample Details
Test Depth : 5.60m

Description :
Height, H o (mm) : 20.00 Machine Channel : M15
Diameter, D o (mm) : 50.00 Type of Sample : Undisturbed
3
Weight, W o (g) : 72.3 Particle Density, ρs (Mg/m ) : 2.66 (Measured)
Initial Conditions Final Conditions
Moisture Content, wo (%) : 28.8 Moisture Content, wf (%) : 29.3

3 3
Bulk Density, ρ (Mg/m ) : 1.841 Bulk Density, ρf (Mg/m ) : 2.038
3 3
Dry Density, P d (Mg/m ) : 1.429 Dry Density, ρdf (Mg/m ) : 1.576
Void Ratio, eo : 0.861 Void Ratio, ef : 0.688
Deg. of Saturation, So (%) : 89.0 Deg. of Saturation, Sf (%) : 100.0
Ave. Room Temp, (°C) : 25.5 Settlement (mm) : 1.860
Test Results
Pre-Consolidation Pressure, Pc' (kPa) : 395 Compression Index, Cc : 0.283
Notes :
Inc. Load Settlement Def. Mean Void t90 Cv mv Cv kv

No. Reading Correction Temp. Ratio 20°C 20°C
(kPa) (mm) (mm) (°C) (e) (min) (m2/yr) (m2/MN) (m2/yr) (10-9 m/s)
1 25 0.124 0.022 26.0 0.852 1.276 34.619 0.204 30.149 1.907
2 50 0.233 0.037 26.0 0.843 1.093 40.019 0.189 34.852 2.042
3 100 0.408 0.061 25.0 0.829 0.815 53.012 0.152 47.226 2.225
4 200 0.691 0.090 25.0 0.805 1.128 37.518 0.129 33.423 1.337
5 400 1.153 0.123 25.0 0.765 0.990 41.268 0.111 36.764 1.265
6 800 1.891 0.164 25.0 0.700 1.269 30.333 0.092 27.023 0.771
7 1600 2.859 0.212 26.0 0.615 0.921 38.242 0.063 33.304 0.650
8 400 2.615 0.153 26.0 0.632 0.009
9 100 2.273 0.104 25.0 0.659 0.056
10 25 1.926 0.066 26.0 0.688 0.231
Page 1 of 2
Tested by: Hidayah Checked by: Ifah Approved by: Tay KH

Borehole No.: BH 1
Sample No.: UD 2
Depth: 5.00-5.70m

Incremental Loading
Pc' = 395 kPa

1.04
0.98
0.92
0.86
0.80
Void Ratio
0.74
0.68
0.62
0.56
0.50
0.44
52.00 0.32
44.00 0.24
□ - Mv (m2/MN)
○ - Cv 20°° (m2/yr)
36.00 0.16
28.00 0.08
20.00 0.00
0.0040 100
◊ - Kv 20°° (10-9 m/s)
0.0030 10
Δ - Cα
0.0020 1
0.0010 0.1
0.0000 0.01
1 10 100 1000 10000
Load (kPa)
Page 2 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 3
Sample No.: UD 2
Depth: 6.50-7.20m

Incremental Loading
Sample Details
Test Depth : 7.10m

Description :
Height, H o (mm) : 20.00 Machine Channel : A10
3

3 3
3 3
Test Results
Notes :

1 25 0.061 0.031 26.0 0.671 3.968 11.173 0.060 9.730 0.181
2 50 0.161 0.051 26.0 0.665 1.509 29.218 0.160 25.446 1.262
3 100 0.435 0.078 26.0 0.644 1.873 23.156 0.248 20.166 1.550
4 200 0.728 0.108 26.0 0.622 1.462 28.905 0.134 25.173 1.046
5 400 1.216 0.143 26.0 0.584 2.616 15.567 0.117 13.557 0.492
6 800 1.838 0.184 26.0 0.536 3.755 10.268 0.077 8.942 0.213
7 1600 2.530 0.220 26.0 0.481 3.755 9.597 0.045 8.358 0.117
8 400 2.364 0.158 26.0 0.489 0.005
9 100 2.086 0.100 26.0 0.508 0.041
10 25 1.840 0.053 26.0 0.524 0.147
Page 1 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 3
Sample No.: UD 2
Depth: 6.50-7.20m

Incremental Loading
Pc' = 230 kPa

0.88
0.82
0.76
0.70
0.64
Void Ratio
0.58
0.52
0.46
0.40
0.34
0.28
28.0 0.32
22.5 0.24
□ - Mv (m2/MN)
○ - Cv 20°° (m2/yr)
17.0 0.16
11.5 0.08
6.0 0.00
0.0040 10
◊ - Kv 20°° (10-9 m/s)
0.0030 1
Δ - Cα
0.0020 0.1
0.0010 0.01
0.0000 0.001
1 10 100 1000 10000
Load (kPa)
Page 2 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 4
Sample No.: UD 1
Depth: 2.00-2.70m

Incremental Loading
Sample Details
Test Depth : 2.60m

Description :
3

3 3
3 3
Test Results
Notes :

1 25 0.265 0.032 26.0 0.803 0.630 69.661 0.466 60.667 8.764
2 50 0.416 0.055 26.0 0.791 0.504 85.498 0.259 74.459 5.978
3 100 0.641 0.086 26.0 0.773 0.501 84.610 0.198 73.686 4.523
4 200 0.982 0.125 26.0 0.746 0.498 82.973 0.155 72.260 3.472
5 400 1.511 0.174 26.0 0.702 0.498 79.644 0.125 69.361 2.688
6 800 2.284 0.234 26.0 0.637 0.608 61.186 0.096 53.286 1.586
7 1600 3.264 0.300 26.0 0.554 0.498 68.206 0.064 59.400 1.178
8 400 3.008 0.208 26.0 0.569 0.008
9 100 2.711 0.122 26.0 0.588 0.041
10 25 2.408 0.066 26.0 0.610 0.189
Page 1 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 4
Sample No.: UD 1
Depth: 2.00-2.70m

Incremental Loading
Pc' = 385 kPa

0.98
0.92
0.86
0.80
0.74
Void Ratio
0.68
0.62
0.56
0.50
0.44
0.38
82.00 0.60
74.00 0.45
□ - Mv (m2/MN)
○ - Cv 20°° (m2/yr)
66.00 0.30
58.00 0.15
50.00 0.00
0.0040 100
◊ - Kv 20°° (10-9 m/s)
0.0030 10
Δ - Cα
0.0020 1
0.0010 0.1
0.0000 0.01
1 10 100 1000 10000
Load (kPa)
Page 2 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 6
Sample No.: UD 2
Depth: 5.00-5.70m

Incremental Loading
Sample Details
Test Depth : 5.60m

Description :
3

3 3
3 3
Test Results
Notes :

1 50 0.122 0.044 26.0 0.675 0.681 61.731 0.080 53.761 1.333
2 100 0.237 0.064 26.0 0.667 0.935 44.565 0.098 38.811 1.179
3 200 0.462 0.089 25.0 0.650 1.093 37.543 0.103 33.446 1.068
4 400 0.889 0.119 25.0 0.616 1.274 31.218 0.104 27.811 0.897
5 800 1.346 0.156 25.0 0.579 0.967 39.371 0.056 35.074 0.609
6 1600 1.966 0.203 25.0 0.530 1.226 29.413 0.039 26.203 0.317
7 3200 2.732 0.276 26.0 0.470 1.044 32.157 0.024 28.005 0.208
8 800 2.537 0.194 26.0 0.480 0.003
9 200 2.232 0.129 25.0 0.501 0.023
10 50 1.947 0.087 26.0 0.522 0.093
Page 1 of 2
Tested by: Hidayah Checked by: Ifah Approved by: Tay

Borehole No.: BH 6
Sample No.: UD 2
Depth: 5.00-5.70m

Incremental Loading
Pc' = 495 kPa

0.88
0.82
0.76
0.70
0.64
Void Ratio
0.58
0.52
0.46
0.40
0.34
0.28
60.0 0.12
50.0 0.09
□ - Mv (m2/MN)
○ - Cv 20°° (m2/yr)
40.0 0.06
30.0 0.03
20.0 0.00
0.0040 10
◊ - Kv 20°° (10-9 m/s)
0.0030 1
Δ - Cα
0.0020 0.1
0.0010 0.01
0.0000 0.001
1 10 100 1000 10000
Load (kPa)
Page 2 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 7
Sample No.: UD 1
Depth: 2.00-2.70m

Incremental Loading
Sample Details
Test Depth : 2.60m

Description :
3

3 3
3 3
Test Results
Notes :

1 25 0.260 0.042 26.0 0.815 0.689 63.741 0.436 55.511 7.503
2 50 0.443 0.069 26.0 0.801 0.561 76.819 0.315 66.901 6.533
3 100 0.726 0.104 26.0 0.778 0.646 65.350 0.253 56.913 4.464
4 200 1.163 0.143 26.0 0.741 0.647 63.106 0.205 54.958 3.493
5 400 1.779 0.191 26.0 0.689 0.608 63.814 0.150 55.575 2.584
6 800 2.550 0.262 26.0 0.625 0.687 52.711 0.095 45.905 1.352
7 1600 3.404 0.289 26.0 0.549 0.464 71.589 0.058 62.346 1.121
8 400 3.215 0.205 26.0 0.559 0.005
9 100 2.875 0.129 26.0 0.583 0.052
10 25 2.534 0.075 26.0 0.609 0.222
Page 1 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 7
Sample No.: UD 1
Depth: 2.00-2.70m

Incremental Loading
Pc' = 250 kPa

0.98
0.92
0.86
0.80
0.74
Void Ratio
0.68
0.62
0.56
0.50
0.44
0.38
70.00 0.56
63.00 0.42
□ - Mv (m2/MN)
○ - Cv 20°° (m2/yr)
56.00 0.28
49.00 0.14
42.00 0.00
0.0040 100
◊ - Kv 20°° (10-9 m/s)
0.0030 10
Δ - Cα
0.0020 1
0.0010 0.1
0.0000 0.01
1 10 100 1000 10000
Load (kPa)
Page 2 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 9
Sample No.: UD 1
Depth: 2.00-2.70m

Incremental Loading
Sample Details
Test Depth : 2.60m

Description :
3

3 3
3 3
Test Results
Notes :

1 50 0.135 0.041 26.0 0.536 1.423 29.518 0.096 25.707 0.765
2 100 0.260 0.063 26.0 0.527 2.129 19.531 0.106 17.009 0.559
3 200 0.457 0.090 25.0 0.514 12.452 3.292 0.088 2.933 0.080
4 400 0.760 0.124 25.0 0.493 14.066 2.848 0.070 2.537 0.055
5 800 1.164 0.166 25.0 0.464 16.546 2.342 0.048 2.086 0.031
6 1600 1.658 0.206 25.0 0.428 13.681 2.710 0.031 2.414 0.023
7 3200 2.215 0.267 26.0 0.389 9.173 3.834 0.017 3.339 0.018
8 800 2.004 0.197 26.0 0.400 0.003
9 200 1.709 0.139 25.0 0.419 0.022
10 50 1.407 0.095 26.0 0.439 0.096
Page 1 of 2

Borehole No.: BH 9
Sample No.: UD 1
Depth: 2.00-2.70m

Incremental Loading
Pc' = 420 kPa

0.66
0.62
0.58
0.54
0.50
Void Ratio
0.46
0.42
0.38
0.34
0.30
0.26
32.00 0.12
24.00 0.09
□ - Mv (m2/MN)
○ - Cv 20°° (m2/yr)
16.00 0.06
8.00 0.03
0.00 0.00
0.0040 10
◊ - Kv 20°° (10-9 m/s)
0.0030 1
Δ - Cα
0.0020 0.1
0.0010 0.01
0.0000 0.001
1 10 100 1000 10000
Load (kPa)
Page 2 of 2

GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix C Electrical Resistivity Tests and Thermal

Conductivity Tests
Project LOTTE-TITAN, TE-3 PROJECT, PASIR GUDANG, JOHOR
Point No. ERT-1 Date 16-05-15 Geolab




Project: LOTTE-TITAN, TE-3 PROJECT, PASIR GUDANG, Test Date:
JOHOR
Location: Pasir Gudang, Johor
GEOLAB Client: Tester: JAMAL
Consultant: Weather: Fine
Tested by: Checked by: Approved by:

JAMAL THA
In-Situ Thermal Test

Test Apparatus:
Equipment used: KD2 (Thermal Properties Analyzer)

Needle used: Thermal Needle
Length (mm): 100
Diameter (mm): 2.4
Test Conditions and Results:

Date 15-05-15
ERT - 1 Remarks
Test No. 1 2 3 Average
Depth from surface (m) 0 0 0 0
Thermal Resistivity (°C m/W) 1.32 1.02 1.16 1.17
Thermal Conductivity (W/°C m) 0.76 0.98 0.86 0.87
Temperature (°C) 27.9 27.3 27.2 27.5
Date 15-05-15
ERT -2 Remarks
Depth from surface (m) 0 0.00 0.00 0
Temperature (°C) 28.7 28.7 28.7 28.7
Date 15-05-15
ERT-3 Remarks
Temperature (°C) 24.7 27.2 27.3 26.4
Date 28-05-15
ERT-4 Remarks
Temperature (°C) 29.2 29.3 29.3 29.3
GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix D Aggressiveness of Soil and Ground Water to

Steel and Concrete
399
7888
!"#$%"&#'()*(#+*+')#
,-#).//#'(*.'+&.).')###01.+#(.+%"&#)2
%"&# 301.+%#).'(**.'+ -#).//#'(*.'+
)"++ 4.')#'*.'.&+%"&#'(/5'#+*%/76
7'5.%'(8# 7'+.*".&*"" 4#/#'5.%1 :#'+#&%"";)./1)#(
9&./ !"#!, ).')##/(#8*<=//
'./*'"/60*/%/ +*>#
55#5#+ ).'&./*'5.
.=?
;)*(#0)*.' ; 4#/#' A##
tuvwxywz{|}~{u}u}{|uwu{t{{xv}x}wz{|}~{{
8#@ ).'#''. 8#@)#/#'

+.*" "#++<' *.'./.#
#0) <'
BCDEF G5H6DEF BCI BC5@" G5H6DEF JDEKH
7 L 4MC N L4MC L7M N 7 H N N
4MCOP N 7MOP N 7C6 HH4 4M54
7MC MH H44 4M55
H \4 4M55
H 7M5OP N MCOP N HC4 4M54
HM4 QF99RSPTOU HM] H H4 4M54
C^ HM7OP `7M4 V9R9PS
_M4 W7XOYE9PRF H_MM\O
]
P `7M
H
H\4
H_4
4MC5
4MC5
C1 HM7OP a7M4 ZOY[O HM\OP a7M H H_4 4MC5
_M4 _M]
5^ a_M4 `7M4 a_M] `7M ^9SPY[F99C^bF
99
YS[bYPO[ORPT56
51 a_M4 a7M4 a_M] a7M ^9SPY[F99C1bF
99
YS[bYPO[ORPT56
76QF99RSR[ORPTPTOUV9R9PSDYP
TcXOY9KbF9R9bYSYYcMdRDUYeF
9YDReTSPYXOYE9PRFZOY[ORTY[PDTRORPTPSOU

cRSSR[
FOPSPVORTRTDYbY9TOORe9KbF9TcPS[UReRTD[PKbYVFZOY[ORPTYOOPOUORTcR[OcVTF9R9PS
DYP
TcXOY9KbF9M2
ROVFKOUPc9SPYOUTF9R9PSDYP
TcXOYSPY9
FSOYDReTRT127H]]WfYOHTcRT1
RFcRTD
g9Y[UgbPYO]8h_iXUR[UF9PDRe9KOUPc9SPYcOYKRTORPTPSKDT9R
KMjUTY9
FO9YZbY99c92kHOUKV
[PTeYOcOP2kCVK
FORbFRTDVS[OPYPS7MM
6^cl
9OKTO9OPKRTRK
K[KTO[PTOTO99UP
FcVKcSPYDDYDO9PSTPKRTF9RmPOUYOUT4KKRT[[PYcT[XROU
OVF\M
H6nUFRKROPTXOY69PF
VFKDT9R
KcP9TPObbFOPVY[JR9UDYP
TcXOYo[UFPYRc[PTOTOVOXT7DEFTc7\DEF6M
C6fPYOFTcFRK9OPT[KTO9UP
FcPTFV
9cRT[F9979
FSO[PTcRORPT9M
562Qf74Tc12\74M
pknq7MjROURTOUFRKRO99b[RSRcRTOUR9OVF OU9
FSOY9R9OT[PS[PKVRTORPT9PSDDV9PYbSXROU2gfQXRFFVOF9O
r
ReFTOOP[PKVRTORPT9XROU[KTO[PTSPYKRTDOP127 V
O9
[U[PKVRTORPT9Y
TFRJFOPZ[cOU9
FSOY9R9ORTD
bYSPYKT[PS2gfQM
pknqMQKTO9[PTORTRTDDDV9PYbSYKPY9T9ROReOP9OYPTDKDT9R
K9
FSOTcFRKROPTXOY69PF
VFKDT9R
K
[PTOTOR9DReTSPY[F999CTc5XUT
9RTDOU9[KTO9M
pknqHMnUFRJFRUPPcPSOO[JV9
FSOcbTc9PTOUbY9T[TcKPVRFROPSDYP
TcXOYo9OVF][Tc1gq
sRD9OH_Hh7i6M
01234567888 77

510999
!"#$%"&#'()*(#+*+')#
!,-#.#'/0%1+&0%+#*'!"#
20%1 3#+)*1*0'
0 456789:;<=:8<6:>67=?:@863401
A456789:;A98>7:<<=:8<6:>67=?:@86340BC
<4D?@E9@A98>7:<<=:8<6:>67=?:@8634B1BC
;456789:;F9G7?H;8>9E<=:8<6:>67=?:@8634C7II
456HH69:?<F9G7?H;8>9E<=:8<6:>67=?:@8634CC06
defghigjklmnopkqemrsemkltutvegrewkxdyz{|wk}~|to~wkhfmhrmvvgjklmnokky
>456789:;9?=86:<=:8<6:>67=?:@8634J7IK04
@4L6=A?:8?6:6>56789:;<=:8<6:>67=?:@863401M?8E@@A<6:>67=?:@8634CC99
E4L6=A?:8?6:6>56789:;<=:8<6:>67=?:@863401M?8EF9G7?H;8>9E<6:>67=?:@86
34KI91N5780
1 456789:;F9G7?H;8>9E<=:8<6:>67=?:@8634C7II<6:8?:?:@:6898E:1CO6>F>
A=6>8E:<967<6=A?:8?6:6>56789:;<=:8<6:>67=?:@863401M?8EF>
<6:>67=?:@8634KI91N5780ME78E7?:6898E:17OF>:;:68=678E:B6OF>A
=6>8E<6=A?:8?6:
A4D?@E9@A98>7:<<=:8<6:>67=?:@8634B1BC<6:8?:?:@:6898E:JBO9@A=
6>:<967<6=A?:8?6:6>56789:;<=:8<6:>67=?:@863401M?8E@@A<6:>67=?:@86
34CC99ME78E7?:6898E:J6O@@A:;:68=678E:I7O@@AA=6>8E
<6=A?:8?6:
PQRS0TU67@76F1A<=:8@7:98;A98>7:<9@M?8E9=?:<6:8:8@7878E:0BOE69;A;6:9
M?8E56789:;<=:8EG?:@87?<9<?=9=?:8VLKW4<6:8:8:68X<;?:@06OT
PQRS1TRE:<9?8E8689=6>8E<=:8<6:8?8:8X<9;?:@<9<?=9>8:;:;;?8?G<E
@7?:;?:@?;T
K 49>887?8?:@56789:;<=:8<6:>67=?:@8634B61J
0456789:;9?=86:<=:8E69;6:9A;?:<909>8<6:;?8?6:T
!"#$%"&#'()*(#+*+')#
),Y0(*&*)*0'+0!"#&00Z#[1#+0&#\10+%#'([1#+0&)0'+%)*0'04
488?<@76:;M8714 U67<91K:;B8E7]?7=:8>67<=:8
<=:8<6:8:8:;>7M87^<=:878?6@?G:
?:8A9J=A96M7;A6:<9
3=:8=A:_=:86778?:?:@M99 5>E;7688?<E;@7878E:>?G8?=8E
8E?<_:6>8E<6:<78?<78;A8E
@76:;M878E<9?>?<8?6:?:8A9JE69;A
7?;A6:<9TRE?7]?7=:8<:A
M?G;?>A77?786F7G:8=6?8787:>7
8E76@E8EM99?F76G?;;
L88?:8?8<6:<786G7B76==8E?<_T57<8 U67<91K:;B8E7]?7=:8>67<=:8
@76:;A=M99:?867F?9M?8E=668E @76F<=:8<6:8:8:;>7M87^<=:878?6
7><ME?<E>87:67=9<7?:@EGA:XF6; @?G:?:8A9J=A96M7;A6:<9
86?7A8F768<8;>76=7?:>67G79M_
U67<88?:8?87?:>67<;<6:<78F<?9
<6:?;78?6:E69;A@?G:868E:;86
=?:8?:;]8<6G7868E7?:>67<=:8
L88?:8?8<6:<78V68E78E:@76:;>96679AK44 RE<9?>?<8?6:?:8A9JE69;A7?;A
98E:0B6==8E?<_67EG?:@=:;@:; 6:<9
<67:7
04W:7;<8?6:?:9>8<9996M;A8E?8A96:9FF9?>68E7;7A?9?8:;87<879<6:?;78?6:F7=?8T
14P6=?:99;7?8676?9M?8EF7=A?9?898E:0687=^@?G:?:>?@7C6>34I66BN09ICVT @T:>?7;<94ME7?8?
;<?;;8E88E@76:;M87?:8?9988?<V3`Sa?@8KCKb0c4T
K4U67@76:;>96679A3`Sa?@8KCKb0c
01 23456780999
GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix E Liquefaction Assessment

GL Konsult
A-26-15, Menara UOA Bangsar
No 5, Jalan Bangsar Utama 1, 59000 Kuala Lumpur
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT

Project title : Lotte Chemical Titan - TE3 Project
Project subtitle : BH1
Input parameters and analysis data

In-situ data type: Standard Penetration Test Depth to water table: 0.50 m
Analysis type: Deterministic Earthquake magnitude Mw: 7.00
Analysis method: NCEER 1998 Peak ground accelaration: 0.09 g
Fines correction method: Idriss & Seed User defined F.S.: 1.00
SP T data gr aph Shear str ess r atio Factor of safety Settlements (cm)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
9.00 9.00
9.00 9.00
10.00 10.00
10.00 10.00
11.00 11.00
11.00 11.00
12.00
Depth (m)
12.00
Depth (m)
12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
21.00
21.00 21.00 21.00
22.00
23.00 22.00 22.00 22.00
24.00 23.00 23.00 23.00
25.00 24.00 24.00 24.00
26.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
27.00 26.00 26.00 26.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 27.00 27.00 27.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00
F ield S P T N 1(60)
N1(60)cs C SR C RR F .S . F .S .=1 Total P oint
Mw =71/2 , sigma'=1 atm base curve

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
2 43
5
1 9 116108 12 7
0.1 1314 18
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs
LiqIT v.4.7.7.4 - Soil Liquefaction Assesment Software 1

This software is licensed to : Pak Chong Law
:: Field input data ::
Point ID Depth Field NSPT Unit weight Fines content

(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 3.00 16.00 75.00
2 3.00 4.00 16.00 75.00
3 4.50 6.00 18.00 58.00
4 6.00 6.00 18.00 58.00
5 7.50 7.00 18.00 58.00
6 9.00 17.00 19.00 43.00
7 10.50 21.00 19.00 43.00
8 12.00 20.00 19.00 43.00
9 13.50 19.00 19.00 43.00
10 15.00 22.00 19.00 43.00
11 16.50 22.00 19.00 43.00
12 18.00 26.00 19.00 43.00
13 19.50 25.00 19.00 43.00
14 21.00 27.00 19.00 43.00
15 22.50 50.00 20.00 40.00
16 24.00 50.00 20.00 40.00
17 25.50 50.00 20.00 40.00
18 27.00 50.00 20.00 40.00
Depth : Depth from free surface, at which SPT was performed (m)
Field SPT : SPT blows measured at field (blows/30 cm)
Unit weight : Bulk unit weight of soil at test depth (kN/m³)
Fines content : Percentage of fines in soil (%)
:: Cyclic Stress Ratio calculation (CSR fully adjusted and normalized) ::
Point ID Depth Sigma u Sigma' rd CSR MSF CSReq,M=7.5 Ksigma CSR*

(m) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa)
1 1.50 24.00 9.81 14.19 0.99 0.10 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 48.00 24.52 23.48 0.98 0.12 1.19 0.10 1.00 0.10
3 4.50 75.00 39.24 35.76 0.97 0.12 1.19 0.10 1.00 0.10
4 6.00 102.00 53.95 48.05 0.95 0.12 1.19 0.10 1.00 0.10
5 7.50 129.00 68.67 60.33 0.94 0.12 1.19 0.10 1.00 0.10
6 9.00 157.50 83.39 74.11 0.93 0.12 1.19 0.10 1.00 0.10
7 10.50 186.00 98.10 87.90 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 214.50 112.81 101.69 0.85 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
9 13.50 243.00 127.53 115.47 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.97 0.09
10 15.00 271.50 142.25 129.25 0.77 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.95 0.08
11 16.50 300.00 156.96 143.04 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.93 0.08
12 18.00 328.50 171.68 156.82 0.69 0.09 1.19 0.07 0.91 0.08
13 19.50 357.00 186.39 170.61 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.90 0.07
14 21.00 385.50 201.10 184.40 0.61 0.08 1.19 0.06 0.88 0.07
15 22.50 415.50 215.82 199.68 0.57 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.87 0.07
16 24.00 445.50 230.53 214.97 0.55 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.86 0.07
17 25.50 475.50 245.25 230.25 0.54 0.07 1.19 0.05 0.85 0.06
18 27.00 505.50 259.96 245.53 0.53 0.06 1.19 0.05 0.84 0.06
Sigma : Total overburden pressure at test point, during earthquake (kPa)
u: Water pressure at test point, during earthquake (kPa)
Sigma' : Effective overburden pressure, during earthquake (kPa)
rd : Nonlinear shear mass factor
CSR : Cyclic Stress Ratio
MSF : Magnitude Scaling Factor
CSReq,M=7.5 CSR adjusted for M=7.5
Ksigma Effective overburden stress factor
CSR* CSR fully adjusted

:: Cyclic Resistance Ratio calculation CRR7.5 ::
Point ID Field SPT Cn Ce Cb Cr Cs N1(60) DeltaN N1(60)cs CRR7.5
1 3.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 3.44 5.69 9.13 0.10
2 4.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 4.90 5.98 10.88 0.12
3 6.00 1.67 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 7.68 6.54 14.21 0.15
4 6.00 1.44 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 7.40 6.48 13.88 0.15
5 7.00 1.29 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 7.71 6.54 14.25 0.16
6 17.00 1.16 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 16.88 8.38 25.26 0.29
7 21.00 1.07 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 20.16 9.03 29.19 0.39
8 20.00 0.99 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.85 8.57 26.42 0.31
9 19.00 0.93 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.91 8.18 24.10 0.27
10 22.00 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.42 8.48 25.90 0.30
11 22.00 0.84 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.56 8.31 24.87 0.28
12 26.00 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 18.69 8.74 27.42 0.33
13 25.00 0.77 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.23 8.45 25.67 0.30
14 27.00 0.74 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.90 8.58 26.47 0.31
15 50.00 0.71 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 31.85 11.37 43.21 2.00
16 50.00 0.68 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.69 11.14 41.83 2.00
17 50.00 0.66 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 29.66 10.93 40.59 2.00
18 50.00 0.64 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 28.72 10.74 39.46 2.00
Cn : Overburden corretion factor

Ce : Energy correction factor
Cb : Borehole diameter correction factor
Cr : Rod length correction factor
Cs : Liner correction factor
N1(60) : Corrected NSPT
DeltaN : Addition to corrected NSPT value due to the presence of fines
N1(60)cs : Corected N1(60) value for fines
CRR7.5) : Cyclic resistance ratio for M=7.5
:: Settlements calculation for saturated sands ::
Point ID N1(60) N1 FSL ev Settle.

(%) (cm)
1 9.13 7.61 1.23 0.44 0.00
2 10.88 9.06 1.21 0.44 0.00
3 14.21 11.84 1.56 0.08 0.00
4 13.88 11.57 1.52 0.10 0.00
5 14.25 11.87 1.57 0.08 0.00
6 25.26 21.05 2.98 0.00 0.00
7 29.19 24.33 4.23 0.00 0.00
8 26.42 22.02 3.50 0.00 0.00
9 24.10 20.08 3.13 0.00 0.00
10 25.90 21.58 3.58 0.00 0.00
11 24.87 20.72 3.49 0.00 0.00
12 27.42 22.85 4.27 0.00 0.00
13 25.67 21.39 3.97 0.00 0.00
14 26.47 22.06 4.38 0.00 0.00
15 43.21 36.01 5.00 0.00 0.00
16 41.83 34.86 5.00 0.00 0.00
17 40.59 33.82 5.00 0.00 0.00
18 39.46 32.88 5.00 0.00 0.00
Total settlement : 0.00
N1,(60): Stress normalized and corrected SPT blow count

N1: Japanese equivalent corrected value
FSL: Calculated factor of safety
ev: Post-liquefaction volumentric strain (%)
Settle.: Calculated settlement (cm)

:: Liquefaction potential according to Iwasaki ::
Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00
8 0.00 4.00 0.00
9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00
Overall potential IL : 0.00
IL = 0.00 - No liquefaction
IL between 0.00 and 5 - Liquefaction not probable
IL between 5 and 15 - Liquefaction probable
IL > 15 - Liquefaction certain

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00
6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
9.00
9.00 9.00 9.00
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
10.00
10.00 10.00 10.00
11.00
11.00 11.00 11.00
12.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
21.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 21.00 21.00 21.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
2 65983 74
10
11
0.1 1
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 9.00 18.00 59.00
2 3.00 11.00 18.00 59.00
3 4.50 13.00 18.00 59.00
4 6.00 14.00 18.00 59.00
5 7.50 14.00 18.00 59.00
6 9.00 15.00 18.00 59.00
7 10.50 17.00 18.00 92.00
8 12.00 17.00 18.00 92.00
9 13.50 18.00 19.00 92.00
10 15.00 17.00 19.00 92.00
11 16.50 18.00 19.00 92.00
12 18.00 50.00 19.00 45.00
13 19.50 50.00 19.00 45.00
14 21.00 50.00 20.00 45.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 135.00 68.67 66.33 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 162.00 83.39 78.61 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 189.00 98.10 90.90 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 216.00 112.81 103.19 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.99 0.09
9 13.50 244.50 127.53 116.97 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.97 0.09
10 15.00 273.00 142.25 130.75 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.95 0.08
11 16.50 301.50 156.96 144.54 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.93 0.08
12 18.00 330.00 171.68 158.32 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.91 0.08
13 19.50 358.50 186.39 172.11 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.90 0.07
14 21.00 388.50 201.10 187.40 0.61 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.88 0.07
1 9.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 10.33 7.07 17.39 0.19
2 11.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 13.46 7.69 21.16 0.23
3 13.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 15.39 8.08 23.47 0.26
4 14.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 16.28 8.26 24.54 0.28
5 14.00 1.23 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 14.70 7.94 22.64 0.25
6 15.00 1.13 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 14.46 7.89 22.36 0.25

7 17.00 1.05 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.05 8.21 24.26 0.27
8 17.00 0.98 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.06 8.01 23.07 0.26
9 18.00 0.92 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 14.98 8.00 22.97 0.25
10 17.00 0.87 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 13.38 7.68 21.06 0.23
11 18.00 0.83 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 13.47 7.69 21.17 0.23
12 50.00 0.79 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 35.76 12.15 47.92 2.00
13 50.00 0.76 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 34.30 11.86 46.16 2.00
14 50.00 0.73 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.87 11.57 44.45 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 17.39 14.49 2.48 0.00 0.00
2 21.16 17.63 2.63 0.00 0.00
3 23.47 19.56 2.85 0.00 0.00
4 24.54 20.45 2.97 0.00 0.00
5 22.64 18.86 2.66 0.00 0.00
6 22.36 18.63 2.62 0.00 0.00
7 24.26 20.21 2.99 0.00 0.00
8 23.07 19.23 2.90 0.00 0.00
9 22.97 19.15 2.96 0.00 0.00
10 21.06 17.55 2.75 0.00 0.00
11 21.17 17.64 2.86 0.00 0.00
12 47.92 39.93 5.00 0.00 0.00
13 46.16 38.47 5.00 0.00 0.00
14 44.45 37.04 5.00 0.00 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00
8 0.00 4.00 0.00
9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
12 0.00 1.00 0.00

13 0.00 0.25 0.00

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
9.00 9.00
9.00 9.00
10.00
10.00 10.00 10.00
11.00
11.00
Depth (m)
11.00 11.00
Depth (m)
12.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
21.00
22.00 21.00 21.00 21.00
23.00 22.00 22.00 22.00
24.00 23.00 23.00 23.00

25.00 24.00 24.00 24.00
25.00 25.00 25.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
2 3 4 785 96 11
1 10 12 13
0.1
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 8.00 18.00 65.00
2 3.00 5.00 18.00 65.00
3 4.50 6.00 18.00 65.00
4 6.00 8.00 18.00 65.00
5 7.50 12.00 18.00 65.00
6 9.00 15.00 18.00 65.00
7 10.50 13.00 18.00 65.00
8 12.00 14.00 18.00 65.00
9 13.50 17.00 19.00 46.00
10 15.00 18.00 19.00 46.00
11 16.50 21.00 19.00 46.00
12 18.00 26.00 19.00 46.00
13 19.50 30.00 19.00 46.00
14 21.00 50.00 20.00 46.00
15 22.50 50.00 20.00 46.00
16 24.00 50.00 20.00 46.00
17 25.50 50.00 20.00 46.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 135.00 68.67 66.33 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 162.00 83.39 78.61 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 189.00 98.10 90.90 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 216.00 112.81 103.19 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.99 0.09
9 13.50 244.50 127.53 116.97 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.97 0.09
10 15.00 273.00 142.25 130.75 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.95 0.08
11 16.50 301.50 156.96 144.54 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.93 0.08
12 18.00 330.00 171.68 158.32 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.91 0.08
13 19.50 358.50 186.39 172.11 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.90 0.07
14 21.00 388.50 201.10 187.40 0.61 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.88 0.07
15 22.50 418.50 215.82 202.68 0.57 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.87 0.07
16 24.00 448.50 230.53 217.97 0.55 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.86 0.07
17 25.50 478.50 245.25 233.25 0.54 0.06 1.19 0.05 0.84 0.06

1 8.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 9.18 6.84 16.02 0.17
2 5.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 6.12 6.22 12.34 0.13
3 6.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 7.10 6.42 13.52 0.15
4 8.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 9.30 6.86 16.17 0.18
5 12.00 1.23 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 12.60 7.52 20.12 0.22
6 15.00 1.13 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 14.46 7.89 22.36 0.25
7 13.00 1.05 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.27 7.45 19.73 0.21
8 14.00 0.98 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.40 7.48 19.88 0.22
9 17.00 0.92 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 14.15 7.83 21.98 0.24
10 18.00 0.87 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 14.17 7.83 22.00 0.24
11 21.00 0.83 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.72 8.14 23.86 0.27
12 26.00 0.79 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 18.60 8.72 27.32 0.33
13 30.00 0.76 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 20.58 9.12 29.70 0.43
14 50.00 0.73 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.87 11.57 44.45 2.00
15 50.00 0.70 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 31.61 11.32 42.93 2.00
16 50.00 0.68 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.48 11.10 41.58 2.00
17 50.00 0.65 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 29.46 10.89 40.36 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 16.02 13.35 2.29 0.00 0.00
2 12.34 10.29 1.54 0.10 0.00
3 13.52 11.27 1.61 0.07 0.00
4 16.17 13.47 1.88 0.02 0.00
5 20.12 16.76 2.33 0.00 0.00
6 22.36 18.63 2.62 0.00 0.00
7 19.73 16.44 2.35 0.00 0.00
8 19.88 16.57 2.45 0.00 0.00
9 21.98 18.31 2.80 0.00 0.00
10 22.00 18.33 2.89 0.00 0.00
11 23.86 19.89 3.30 0.00 0.00
12 27.32 22.76 4.25 0.00 0.00
13 29.70 24.75 5.00 0.00 0.00
14 44.45 37.04 5.00 0.00 0.00
15 42.93 35.78 5.00 0.00 0.00
16 41.58 34.65 5.00 0.00 0.00
17 40.36 33.63 5.00 0.00 0.00

Point ID F wz IL

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00
8 0.00 4.00 0.00
9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
9.00
9.00 9.00 9.00
10.00
Depth (m)
10.00
Depth (m)
10.00 10.00
11.00
11.00 11.00 11.00
12.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
21.00
21.00 21.00 21.00
22.00
22.00 22.00 22.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
2 3 645 7 8 9 10 11
0.1 1
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 6.00 18.00 55.00
2 3.00 7.00 18.00 55.00
3 4.50 8.00 18.00 55.00
4 6.00 14.00 18.00 55.00
5 7.50 16.00 19.00 58.00
6 9.00 17.00 19.00 58.00
7 10.50 19.00 19.00 58.00
8 12.00 21.00 19.00 58.00
9 13.50 24.00 19.00 58.00
10 15.00 28.00 19.00 58.00
11 16.50 31.00 19.00 58.00
12 18.00 50.00 20.00 50.00
13 19.50 50.00 20.00 50.00
14 21.00 50.00 20.00 50.00
15 22.50 50.00 20.00 50.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 136.50 68.67 67.83 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 165.00 83.39 81.61 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 193.50 98.10 95.40 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 222.00 112.81 109.19 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.98 0.09
9 13.50 250.50 127.53 122.97 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.96 0.08
10 15.00 279.00 142.25 136.75 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.94 0.08
11 16.50 307.50 156.96 150.54 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.07 0.92 0.08
12 18.00 337.50 171.68 165.82 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.90 0.08
13 19.50 367.50 186.39 181.11 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.89 0.07
14 21.00 397.50 201.10 196.40 0.61 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.87 0.07
15 22.50 427.50 215.82 211.68 0.57 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.86 0.07
1 6.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 6.88 6.38 13.26 0.14
2 7.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 8.57 6.71 15.28 0.17
3 8.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 9.47 6.89 16.36 0.18
4 14.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 16.28 8.26 24.54 0.28

5 16.00 1.21 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 16.61 8.32 24.93 0.28
6 17.00 1.11 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 16.09 8.22 24.31 0.27
7 19.00 1.02 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.51 8.50 26.01 0.30
8 21.00 0.96 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 18.09 8.62 26.71 0.32
9 24.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 19.48 8.90 28.37 0.36
10 28.00 0.86 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 21.55 9.31 30.86 2.00
11 31.00 0.82 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 22.74 9.55 32.29 2.00
12 50.00 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 34.95 11.99 46.93 2.00
13 50.00 0.74 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 33.44 11.69 45.13 2.00
14 50.00 0.71 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.11 11.42 43.53 2.00
15 50.00 0.69 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.93 11.19 42.12 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 13.26 11.05 1.90 0.02 0.00
2 15.28 12.73 1.90 0.02 0.00
3 16.36 13.64 1.94 0.01 0.00
4 24.54 20.45 2.97 0.00 0.00
5 24.93 20.78 3.05 0.00 0.00
6 24.31 20.26 2.97 0.00 0.00
7 26.01 21.67 3.40 0.00 0.00
8 26.71 22.25 3.65 0.00 0.00
9 28.37 23.65 4.24 0.00 0.00
10 30.86 25.72 5.00 0.00 0.00
11 32.29 26.91 5.00 0.00 0.00
12 46.93 39.11 5.00 0.00 0.00
13 45.13 37.60 5.00 0.00 0.00
14 43.53 36.28 5.00 0.00 0.00
15 42.12 35.10 5.00 0.00 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
8 0.00 4.00 0.00

9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
9.00
9.00 9.00 9.00
10.00
10.00 10.00 10.00
Depth (m)
11.00
Depth (m)
11.00 11.00 11.00

12.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
21.00
21.00 21.00 21.00
22.00
22.00 22.00 22.00
23.00
24.00 23.00 23.00 23.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 24.00 24.00 24.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
43 2 697 85
1 10 11 12
0.1
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 8.00 18.00 55.00
2 3.00 8.00 18.00 52.00
3 4.50 7.00 18.00 52.00
4 6.00 7.00 18.00 52.00
5 7.50 17.00 19.00 94.00
6 9.00 17.00 19.00 94.00
7 10.50 18.00 19.00 94.00
8 12.00 20.00 19.00 94.00
9 13.50 20.00 19.00 94.00
10 15.00 17.00 19.00 94.00
11 16.50 19.00 19.00 94.00
12 18.00 35.00 20.00 55.00
13 19.50 50.00 20.00 55.00
14 21.00 50.00 20.00 55.00
15 22.50 50.00 20.00 55.00
16 24.00 50.00 20.00 55.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 136.50 68.67 67.83 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 165.00 83.39 81.61 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 193.50 98.10 95.40 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 222.00 112.81 109.19 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.98 0.09
9 13.50 250.50 127.53 122.97 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.96 0.08
10 15.00 279.00 142.25 136.75 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.94 0.08
11 16.50 307.50 156.96 150.54 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.07 0.92 0.08
12 18.00 337.50 171.68 165.82 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.90 0.08
13 19.50 367.50 186.39 181.11 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.89 0.07
14 21.00 397.50 201.10 196.40 0.61 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.87 0.07
15 22.50 427.50 215.82 211.68 0.57 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.86 0.07
16 24.00 457.50 230.53 226.97 0.55 0.07 1.19 0.05 0.85 0.06
1 8.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 9.18 6.84 16.02 0.17
2 8.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 9.79 6.96 16.75 0.18

3 7.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 8.29 6.66 14.94 0.16
4 7.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 8.14 6.63 14.77 0.16
5 17.00 1.21 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 17.65 8.53 26.18 0.31
6 17.00 1.11 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 16.09 8.22 24.31 0.27
7 18.00 1.02 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.59 8.32 24.90 0.28
8 20.00 0.96 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.23 8.45 25.67 0.30
9 20.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.23 8.25 24.48 0.28
10 17.00 0.86 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 13.08 7.62 20.70 0.23
11 19.00 0.82 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 13.94 7.79 21.72 0.24
12 35.00 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 24.46 9.89 34.35 2.00
13 50.00 0.74 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 33.44 11.69 45.13 2.00
14 50.00 0.71 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.11 11.42 43.53 2.00
15 50.00 0.69 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.93 11.19 42.12 2.00
16 50.00 0.66 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 29.87 10.97 40.84 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 16.02 13.35 2.29 0.00 0.00
2 16.75 13.96 2.07 0.00 0.00
3 14.94 12.45 1.77 0.03 0.00
4 14.77 12.31 1.72 0.04 0.00
5 26.18 21.81 3.29 0.00 0.00
6 24.31 20.26 2.97 0.00 0.00
7 24.90 20.75 3.18 0.00 0.00
8 25.67 21.39 3.42 0.00 0.00
9 24.48 20.40 3.26 0.00 0.00
10 20.70 17.25 2.74 0.00 0.00
11 21.72 18.10 2.98 0.00 0.00
12 34.35 28.63 5.00 0.00 0.00
13 45.13 37.60 5.00 0.00 0.00
14 43.53 36.28 5.00 0.00 0.00
15 42.12 35.10 5.00 0.00 0.00
16 40.84 34.04 5.00 0.00 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
Point ID F wz IL
5 0.00 6.25 0.00

6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00
8 0.00 4.00 0.00
9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00
5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00
6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
9.00
9.00 9.00 9.00
10.00
10.00 10.00 10.00
11.00
11.00 11.00 11.00
12.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
3 26 584 7 9 11 10
0.1 1 13 12
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 9.00 18.00 62.00
2 3.00 10.00 18.00 62.00
3 4.50 8.00 18.00 62.00
4 6.00 13.00 18.00 50.00
5 7.50 14.00 18.00 50.00
6 9.00 13.00 18.00 50.00
7 10.50 19.00 19.00 93.00
8 12.00 17.00 19.00 93.00
9 13.50 29.00 19.00 93.00
10 15.00 50.00 20.00 0.00
11 16.50 50.00 20.00 0.00
12 18.00 50.00 20.00 0.00
13 19.50 50.00 20.00 0.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 135.00 68.67 66.33 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 162.00 83.39 78.61 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 190.50 98.10 92.40 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 219.00 112.81 106.19 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.99 0.09
9 13.50 247.50 127.53 119.97 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.96 0.09
10 15.00 277.50 142.25 135.25 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.94 0.08
11 16.50 307.50 156.96 150.54 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.07 0.92 0.08
12 18.00 337.50 171.68 165.82 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.90 0.08
13 19.50 367.50 186.39 181.11 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.89 0.07
1 9.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 10.33 7.07 17.39 0.19
2 10.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 12.24 7.45 19.69 0.21
3 8.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 9.47 6.89 16.36 0.18
4 13.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 15.12 8.02 23.14 0.26
5 14.00 1.23 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 14.70 7.94 22.64 0.25
6 13.00 1.13 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 12.54 7.51 20.04 0.22
7 19.00 1.04 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.79 8.56 26.35 0.31
8 17.00 0.97 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 14.85 7.97 22.82 0.25

9 29.00 0.91 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 23.83 9.77 33.59 2.00
10 50.00 0.86 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 38.69 0.00 38.69 2.00
11 50.00 0.82 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 36.68 0.00 36.68 2.00
12 50.00 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 34.95 0.00 34.95 2.00
13 50.00 0.74 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 33.44 0.00 33.44 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 17.39 14.49 2.48 0.00 0.00
2 19.69 16.41 2.44 0.00 0.00
3 16.36 13.64 1.94 0.01 0.00
4 23.14 19.29 2.75 0.00 0.00
5 22.64 18.86 2.66 0.00 0.00
6 20.04 16.70 2.32 0.00 0.00
7 26.35 21.96 3.42 0.00 0.00
8 22.82 19.01 2.89 0.00 0.00
9 33.59 28.00 5.00 0.00 0.00
10 38.69 32.24 5.00 0.00 0.00
11 36.68 30.56 5.00 0.00 0.00
12 34.95 29.12 5.00 0.00 0.00
13 33.44 27.86 5.00 0.00 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00
8 0.00 4.00 0.00
9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00

Point ID F wz IL

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
9.00
9.00 9.00 9.00
10.00
Depth (m)
10.00
Depth (m)
10.00 10.00
11.00
11.00 11.00 11.00
12.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
21.00
21.00 21.00 21.00
22.00
22.00 22.00 22.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
2 35 4 87 6 9
10 11
0.1 1
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 6.00 18.00 54.00
2 3.00 8.00 18.00 54.00
3 4.50 11.00 18.00 54.00
4 6.00 13.00 18.00 54.00
5 7.50 13.00 18.00 54.00
6 9.00 17.00 19.00 45.00
7 10.50 17.00 19.00 45.00
8 12.00 18.00 19.00 45.00
9 13.50 21.00 19.00 45.00
10 15.00 20.00 19.00 45.00
11 16.50 23.00 19.00 45.00
12 18.00 50.00 20.00 45.00
13 19.50 50.00 20.00 45.00
14 21.00 50.00 20.00 45.00
15 22.50 50.00 20.00 45.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 135.00 68.67 66.33 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 163.50 83.39 80.11 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 192.00 98.10 93.90 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 220.50 112.81 107.69 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.99 0.09
9 13.50 249.00 127.53 121.47 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.96 0.09
10 15.00 277.50 142.25 135.25 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.94 0.08
11 16.50 306.00 156.96 149.04 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.07 0.92 0.08
12 18.00 336.00 171.68 164.32 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.91 0.08
13 19.50 366.00 186.39 179.61 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.89 0.07
14 21.00 396.00 201.10 194.90 0.61 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.88 0.07
15 22.50 426.00 215.82 210.18 0.57 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.86 0.07
1 6.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 6.88 6.38 13.26 0.14
2 8.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 9.79 6.96 16.75 0.18
3 11.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 13.02 7.60 20.63 0.22
4 13.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 15.12 8.02 23.14 0.26

5 13.00 1.23 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 13.65 7.73 21.38 0.23
6 17.00 1.12 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 16.24 8.25 24.49 0.28
7 17.00 1.03 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.79 8.16 23.95 0.27
8 18.00 0.96 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.61 8.12 23.73 0.27
9 21.00 0.91 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.15 8.43 25.58 0.29
10 20.00 0.86 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.48 8.10 23.57 0.26
11 23.00 0.82 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.96 8.39 25.35 0.29
12 50.00 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 35.10 12.02 47.13 2.00
13 50.00 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 33.58 11.72 45.29 2.00
14 50.00 0.72 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.23 11.45 43.68 2.00
15 50.00 0.69 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 31.04 11.21 42.25 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 13.26 11.05 1.90 0.02 0.00
2 16.75 13.96 2.07 0.00 0.00
3 20.63 17.19 2.45 0.00 0.00
4 23.14 19.29 2.75 0.00 0.00
5 21.38 17.81 2.49 0.00 0.00
6 24.49 20.41 2.97 0.00 0.00
7 23.95 19.96 2.99 0.00 0.00
8 23.73 19.78 3.05 0.00 0.00
9 25.58 21.32 3.46 0.00 0.00
10 23.57 19.64 3.18 0.00 0.00
11 25.35 21.12 3.63 0.00 0.00
12 47.13 39.27 5.00 0.00 0.00
13 45.29 37.74 5.00 0.00 0.00
14 43.68 36.40 5.00 0.00 0.00
15 42.25 35.21 5.00 0.00 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
8 0.00 4.00 0.00

9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
9.00
9.00 9.00 9.00
10.00
Depth (m)
10.00
Depth (m)
10.00 10.00
11.00
11.00 11.00 11.00
12.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
13.00
13.00 13.00 13.00
14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
20.00 20.00 20.00
21.00
21.00 21.00 21.00
22.00
22.00 22.00 22.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
4 32 56 78 9
1 10 11
0.1
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 7.00 18.00 71.00
2 3.00 8.00 18.00 71.00
3 4.50 8.00 18.00 71.00
4 6.00 7.00 18.00 71.00
5 7.50 10.00 18.00 44.00
6 9.00 11.00 18.00 44.00
7 10.50 13.00 18.00 44.00
8 12.00 14.00 18.00 44.00
9 13.50 20.00 19.00 42.00
10 15.00 24.00 19.00 42.00
11 16.50 33.00 20.00 42.00
12 18.00 50.00 20.00 42.00
13 19.50 50.00 20.00 42.00
14 21.00 50.00 20.00 42.00
15 22.50 50.00 20.00 42.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 135.00 68.67 66.33 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 162.00 83.39 78.61 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 189.00 98.10 90.90 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 216.00 112.81 103.19 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.99 0.09
9 13.50 244.50 127.53 116.97 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.97 0.09
10 15.00 273.00 142.25 130.75 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.95 0.08
11 16.50 303.00 156.96 146.04 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.07 0.93 0.08
12 18.00 333.00 171.68 161.32 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.91 0.08
13 19.50 363.00 186.39 176.61 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.89 0.07
14 21.00 393.00 201.10 191.90 0.61 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.88 0.07
15 22.50 423.00 215.82 207.18 0.57 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.86 0.07
1 7.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 8.03 6.61 14.64 0.16
2 8.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 9.79 6.96 16.75 0.18
3 8.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 9.47 6.89 16.36 0.18
4 7.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 8.14 6.63 14.77 0.16

5 10.00 1.23 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 10.50 7.10 17.60 0.19
6 11.00 1.13 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 10.61 7.12 17.73 0.19
7 13.00 1.05 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.27 7.45 19.73 0.21
8 14.00 0.98 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.40 7.48 19.88 0.22
9 20.00 0.92 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.64 8.33 24.97 0.28
10 24.00 0.87 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 18.89 8.78 27.67 0.34
11 33.00 0.83 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 24.58 9.92 34.49 2.00
12 50.00 0.79 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 35.43 12.09 47.52 2.00
13 50.00 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 33.86 11.77 45.63 2.00
14 50.00 0.72 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 32.48 11.50 43.98 2.00
15 50.00 0.69 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 31.26 11.25 42.52 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 14.64 12.20 2.10 0.00 0.00
2 16.75 13.96 2.07 0.00 0.00
3 16.36 13.64 1.94 0.01 0.00
4 14.77 12.31 1.72 0.04 0.00
5 17.60 14.66 2.03 0.00 0.00
6 17.73 14.77 2.05 0.00 0.00
7 19.73 16.44 2.35 0.00 0.00
8 19.88 16.57 2.45 0.00 0.00
9 24.97 20.81 3.30 0.00 0.00
10 27.67 23.06 4.05 0.00 0.00
11 34.49 28.74 5.00 0.00 0.00
12 47.52 39.60 5.00 0.00 0.00
13 45.63 38.03 5.00 0.00 0.00
14 43.98 36.65 5.00 0.00 0.00
15 42.52 35.43 5.00 0.00 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00

Point ID F wz IL
8 0.00 4.00 0.00

9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00

GL Konsult
Tel: 603-2287 7520 Fax: 603-2287 7525


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
7.00 7.00
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
9.00 9.00
9.00 9.00
10.00 10.00
10.00 10.00
11.00
11.00 11.00 11.00
12.00 12.00
12.00 12.00
Depth (m)
13.00
Depth (m)
13.00 13.00 13.00

14.00
14.00 14.00 14.00
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
16.00
16.00 16.00 16.00
17.00
17.00 17.00 17.00
18.00
18.00 18.00 18.00
19.00
19.00 19.00 19.00
20.00
21.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
22.00 21.00 21.00 21.00
23.00 22.00 22.00 22.00
24.00 23.00 23.00 23.00
25.00 24.00 24.00 24.00
26.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
27.00 26.00 26.00 26.00
28.00 27.00 27.00 27.00
28.00 28.00 28.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00

0.6
Liquefaction
0.5
0.4
CSR*
0.3
0.2
2 435 6 8 7 9 11
10
12
0.1 1 141513 19 18
No Liquefaction
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
N1(60)cs


(m) (blows/30 cm) (kN/m³) (%)
1 1.50 7.00 18.00 89.00
2 3.00 6.00 18.00 89.00
3 4.50 7.00 18.00 89.00
4 6.00 7.00 18.00 89.00
5 7.50 8.00 18.00 89.00
6 9.00 12.00 18.00 72.00
7 10.50 15.00 18.00 72.00
8 12.00 14.00 18.00 72.00
9 13.50 19.00 19.00 62.00
10 15.00 21.00 19.00 62.00
11 16.50 22.00 19.00 62.00
12 18.00 23.00 19.00 62.00
13 19.50 26.00 19.00 62.00
14 21.00 25.00 19.00 62.00
15 22.50 27.00 19.00 62.00
16 24.00 50.00 20.00 62.00
17 25.50 50.00 20.00 62.00
18 27.00 50.00 20.00 62.00
19 28.50 50.00 20.00 62.00

1 1.50 27.00 9.81 17.19 0.99 0.09 1.19 0.08 1.00 0.08
2 3.00 54.00 24.52 29.48 0.98 0.10 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
3 4.50 81.00 39.24 41.76 0.97 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
4 6.00 108.00 53.95 54.05 0.95 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
5 7.50 135.00 68.67 66.33 0.94 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
6 9.00 162.00 83.39 78.61 0.93 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
7 10.50 189.00 98.10 90.90 0.89 0.11 1.19 0.09 1.00 0.09
8 12.00 216.00 112.81 103.19 0.85 0.10 1.19 0.09 0.99 0.09
9 13.50 244.50 127.53 116.97 0.81 0.10 1.19 0.08 0.97 0.09
10 15.00 273.00 142.25 130.75 0.77 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.95 0.08
11 16.50 301.50 156.96 144.54 0.73 0.09 1.19 0.08 0.93 0.08
12 18.00 330.00 171.68 158.32 0.69 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.91 0.08
13 19.50 358.50 186.39 172.11 0.65 0.08 1.19 0.07 0.90 0.07
14 21.00 387.00 201.10 185.90 0.61 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.88 0.07
15 22.50 415.50 215.82 199.68 0.57 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.87 0.07
16 24.00 445.50 230.53 214.97 0.55 0.07 1.19 0.06 0.86 0.07
17 25.50 475.50 245.25 230.25 0.54 0.07 1.19 0.05 0.85 0.06
18 27.00 505.50 259.96 245.53 0.53 0.06 1.19 0.05 0.84 0.06
19 28.50 535.50 274.68 260.82 0.52 0.06 1.19 0.05 0.83 0.06

1 7.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.75 1.00 8.03 6.61 14.64 0.16
2 6.00 1.70 0.90 1.00 0.80 1.00 7.34 6.47 13.81 0.15
3 7.00 1.55 0.90 1.00 0.85 1.00 8.29 6.66 14.94 0.16
4 7.00 1.36 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 8.14 6.63 14.77 0.16
5 8.00 1.23 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 8.40 6.68 15.08 0.16
6 12.00 1.13 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 11.57 7.31 18.89 0.21
7 15.00 1.05 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 14.16 7.83 21.99 0.24
8 14.00 0.98 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.40 7.48 19.88 0.22
9 19.00 0.92 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 15.81 8.16 23.97 0.27
10 21.00 0.87 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.53 8.31 24.83 0.28
11 22.00 0.83 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.47 8.29 24.76 0.28
12 23.00 0.79 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.45 8.29 24.74 0.28
13 26.00 0.76 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.84 8.57 26.40 0.31
14 25.00 0.73 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 16.50 8.30 24.80 0.28
15 27.00 0.71 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.20 8.44 25.64 0.30
16 50.00 0.68 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 30.69 11.14 41.83 2.00
17 50.00 0.66 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 29.66 10.93 40.59 2.00
18 50.00 0.64 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 28.72 10.74 39.46 2.00
19 50.00 0.62 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 27.86 10.57 38.44 2.00


(%) (cm)
1 14.64 12.20 2.10 0.00 0.00
2 13.81 11.51 1.72 0.05 0.00
3 14.94 12.45 1.77 0.03 0.00
4 14.77 12.31 1.72 0.04 0.00
5 15.08 12.57 1.75 0.04 0.00
6 18.89 15.74 2.18 0.00 0.00
7 21.99 18.33 2.65 0.00 0.00
8 19.88 16.57 2.45 0.00 0.00
9 23.97 19.98 3.12 0.00 0.00
10 24.83 20.70 3.37 0.00 0.00
11 24.76 20.64 3.48 0.00 0.00
12 24.74 20.62 3.61 0.00 0.00
13 26.40 22.00 4.17 0.00 0.00
14 24.80 20.67 3.97 0.00 0.00
15 25.64 21.36 4.40 0.00 0.00
16 41.83 34.86 5.00 0.00 0.00
17 40.59 33.82 5.00 0.00 0.00
18 39.46 32.88 5.00 0.00 0.00
19 38.44 32.03 5.00 0.00 0.00


(%) (cm)

Point ID F wz IL
1 0.00 9.25 0.00

2 0.00 8.50 0.00
3 0.00 7.75 0.00
4 0.00 7.00 0.00
5 0.00 6.25 0.00
6 0.00 5.50 0.00
7 0.00 4.75 0.00
8 0.00 4.00 0.00
9 0.00 3.25 0.00
10 0.00 2.50 0.00
11 0.00 1.75 0.00
12 0.00 1.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.25 0.00

GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix F Tank Stability and Settlement Analyses

190mm
20m
ϕ c γ pw
10 Soil Designation
[°] [kN/m²] [kN/m³] [-]
38.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Crush ROCK 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Sand Fill
0.00 45.00 18.00 0.00 Firm sandy CLAY
8 35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3
0.00 70.00 18.00 0.00 Stiff Sandy SILT
0.00 130.00 19.00 0.00 Very Stiff Sandy SILT
0.00 250.00 20.00 0.00 Very Hard Sandy SILT 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND
6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3
Undrained Static
Basic calculation data
η min = 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3
xm = 17.72 m
4 ym = 3.43 m 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3
R = 6.75 m
1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3
2
ps = 180.00
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
ϕ c γ pw
10 Soil Designation
[°] [kN/m²] [kN/m³] [-]
38.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Crush ROCK 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Sand Fill
0.00 45.00 18.00 0.00 Firm sandy CLAY
8 35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
0.00 70.00 18.00 0.00 Stiff Sandy SILT
0.00 250.00 20.00 0.00 Very Hard Sandy SILT 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND
6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Undrained Seismic
η min = 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
xm = 18.85 m
4 ym = 5.61 m 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2
R = 11.17 m
Erdbebenbeschleunigung:
Horizontal eh/g = 0.0920 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2
Vertical ev/g = 0.0000
2 Formula from Kuntsche
ps = 180.00
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
ϕ c γ pw
10 Soil Designation
[°] [kN/m²] [kN/m³] [-]
3.9 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0
38.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Crush ROCK
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Sand Fill
28.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 Firm sandy CLAY 3.8 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0
8 35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND

30.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 Stiff Sandy SILT 3.8 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9
40.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 Very Hard Sandy SILT
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND 3.6 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9
6
Drained Static 3.5 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9
η min = 1.8 3.4 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8
xm = 18.07 m
4 ym = 2.38 m
3.3 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8
R = 5.01 m
3.3 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8
2
ps = 180.00
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
ϕ c γ pw
10 Soil Designation
[°] [kN/m²] [kN/m³] [-]
38.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Crush ROCK
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Sand Fill 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7
28.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 Firm sandy CLAY
8 35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND
2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7
30.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 Stiff Sandy SILT
40.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 Very Hard Sandy SILT 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7
35.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 Compacted SAND
6 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7
Drained Seismic
Basic calculation data 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.6
η min = 1.6
xm = 18.26 m 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.6
4 ym = 2.97 m
R = 6.43 m
2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6
Erdbebenbeschleunigung:
Horizontal eh/g = 0.0920
Vertical ev/g = 0.0000 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6
2 Formula from Kuntsche
ps = 180.00
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENTS BENEATH CENTRE OF CIRCULAR, UNIFORMLY LOADED,
FOOTING FOUNDED AT THE SURFACE.
(Settlements calculated for sands & clays in layers)
Job Name: 10-269

Date: 07/09/15
Tiltle: Toulene Tank Foundation
User: Ruz Crushed rock / Sand unit wt = kN/m3 19
Crushed rock / Sand thick = m 1.1
Borehole: BH9
Foundation diameter: 20.0 metre Tank Height = m 17.7
Load on foundation: 198.9 kPa Water unit wt = kN/m3 10
Depth Flexible Rigid

Layer Depth Depth Effective Void ratio Preconsol. Clay Clay Clay Sand Initial Increase Total eff. from Layer Centre Edge
Number from to unit wt. (eo) Pressure Cr Cc mv qc stress in stress stress Surface Settlement Settlement Settlement
(m) (m) (kN/m3) (sand=0) (kPa) (m^2/MN) (kPa) (kPa) (kN/m^2) (kN/m^2) (m) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 0.0 1.5 19.0 4000 35.15 198.82 233.97 0.75 13.2 104.9 65.0 65.9
2 1.5 2.0 18.0 1.000 270 0.040 0.170 53.9 197.88 251.78 1.75 6.7 91.7 56.9 57.6
3 2.0 3.0 8.0 1.000 312 0.040 0.170 62.4 196.06 258.46 2.5 12.3 85.0 52.7 53.4
4 3.0 4.0 8.0 1.000 352 0.040 0.170 70.4 191.73 262.13 3.5 11.4 72.7 45.1 45.7
5 4.0 5.0 8.0 1.000 392 0.040 0.170 78.4 185.16 263.56 4.5 10.5 61.2 38.0 38.5
6 5.0 6.0 8.0 1.000 432 0.040 0.170 86.4 176.64 263.04 5.5 9.7 50.7 31.4 31.9
7 6.0 7.0 8.0 1.000 472 0.040 0.170 94.4 166.70 261.10 6.5 8.8 41.0 25.4 25.8
8 7.0 8.0 8.0 1.000 512 0.040 0.170 102.4 155.94 258.34 7.5 8.0 32.2 20.0 20.2
9 8.0 9.0 8.0 1.000 552 0.040 0.170 110.4 144.87 255.27 8.5 7.3 24.2 15.0 15.2
10 9.0 10.0 8.0 1.000 592 0.015 0.100 118.4 133.91 252.31 9.5 2.5 16.9 10.5 10.6
11 10.0 11.0 8.0 1.000 632 0.015 0.100 126.4 123.37 249.77 10.5 2.2 14.4 8.9 9.1
12 11.0 12.0 8.0 1.000 672 0.015 0.100 134.4 113.43 247.83 11.5 2.0 12.2 7.6 7.7
13 12.0 13.0 8.0 1.000 712 0.015 0.100 142.4 104.20 246.60 12.5 1.8 10.2 6.3 6.4
14 13.0 18.0 9.0 1.000 845 0.012 0.060 168.9 80.89 249.79 15.5 5.1 8.4 5.2 5.3
15 18.0 24.0 10.0 1.000 1107 0.012 0.060 221.4 52.51 273.91 21 3.3 3.3 2.1 2.1
CIRSET-BH9
ELASTIC SETTLEMENT CALCULATION BENEATH CIRCULAR, UNIFORMLY LOADED AREA AT GRADE
JOB No. : 10-269

JOB NAME : Toulene Tank Foundation
LOCATION : BH9
Foundation Diameter (m) : 20 Crushed rock / Sand unit wt = kN/m3 19

Load on foundation (kPa) : 198.9 Sand fill thick = m 1.1
Total Settlement (centre) : 128 mm Tank Height = m 17.7

Total Settlement (edge) : 59 mm Water unit wt = kN/m3 10
Layer Soil Depth Depth Sand Sand/ Depth Depth/ Centre of Foundation Edge of Foundation
No: Thick from to /Clay E Clay from radius, A' B' Vertical Layer Total A' B' Vertical Layer Total
(m) (m) (m) (kPa) ν surface,z z/b s/b=0 s/b=0 strain, Settlement Settlement s/b=1 s/b=1 strain, Settlement Settlement
(m) ∈z, (mm) (mm) ∈z, (mm) (mm)
1 1.5 0.0 1.5 25000 0.3 0.75 0.1 1.0000 0.0000 0.0041 6.2 127.7 0.5000 0.0000 0.0021 3.1 58.9
2 0.5 1.5 2.0 10000 0.3 1.75 0.2 0.9005 0.0985 0.0119 5.9 121.5 0.4302 0.0539 0.0058 2.9 55.8
3 1.0 2.0 3.0 10000 0.3 2.5 0.3 0.8039 0.1886 0.0132 13.2 115.5 0.3827 0.0851 0.0062 6.2 52.9
4 1.0 3.0 4.0 10000 0.3 3.5 0.4 0.7127 0.2636 0.0142 14.2 102.3 0.3438 0.1076 0.0063 6.3 46.8
5 1.0 4.0 5.0 10000 0.3 4.5 0.5 0.6286 0.3202 0.0148 14.8 88.2 0.3105 0.1240 0.0064 6.4 40.4
6 1.0 5.0 6.0 10000 0.3 5.5 0.6 0.5528 0.3578 0.0150 15.0 73.4 0.2816 0.1359 0.0064 6.4 34.0
7 1.0 6.0 7.0 10000 0.3 6.5 0.7 0.4855 0.3783 0.0148 14.8 58.4 0.2559 0.1444 0.0064 6.4 27.6
8 1.0 7.0 8.0 10000 0.3 7.5 0.8 0.4265 0.3849 0.0144 14.4 43.6 0.2173 0.1499 0.0061 6.1 21.2
9 1.0 8.0 9.0 10000 0.3 8.5 0.9 0.3753 0.3809 0.0137 13.7 29.2 0.2130 0.1529 0.0062 6.2 15.1
10 1.0 9.0 10.0 75000 0.3 9.5 1.0 0.3310 0.3696 0.0017 1.7 15.5 0.1949 0.1540 0.0008 0.8 8.9
11 1.0 10.0 11.0 75000 0.3 10.5 1.1 0.2929 0.3536 0.0016 1.6 13.8 0.1787 0.1536 0.0008 0.8 8.1
12 1.0 11.0 12.0 75000 0.3 11.5 1.2 0.2929 0.3536 0.0016 1.6 12.2 0.1787 0.1536 0.0008 0.8 7.3
13 1.0 12.0 13.0 75000 0.3 12.5 1.3 0.2318 0.3149 0.0014 1.4 10.5 0.1510 0.1492 0.0007 0.7 6.6
14 2.0 13.0 15.0 100000 0.3 14 1.4 0.1955 0.2756 0.0009 1.8 9.1 0.1302 0.1413 0.0005 1.0 5.9
15 5.0 15.0 20.0 100000 0.3 17.5 1.8 0.1430 0.2252 0.0007 3.7 7.3 0.1105 0.1277 0.0004 2.2 4.9
16 4.0 20.0 24.0 100000 0.3 22 2.2 0.0920 0.1586 0.0005 2.0 3.6 0.0735 0.1045 0.0003 1.4 2.6
17 6.0 24.0 30.0 200000 0.3 27 2.7 0.0634 0.1214 0.0002 1.1 1.6 0.0538 0.0877 0.0001 0.8 1.2
18 5.0 30.0 35.0 500000 0.3 32.5 3.3 0.0470 0.0873 0.0001 0.3 0.5 0.0414 0.0681 0.0000 0.2 0.4
19 5.0 35.0 40.0 500000 0.3 37.5 3.8 0.0363 0.0684 0.0000 0.2 0.2 0.0327 0.0554 0.0000 0.2 0.2
Program CONSOL- Version 5.91 (MS-DOS)
0Lotte Titan TE3 - Tank Settlement - 20m Dia.
NO. OF COMPRESSIBLE UNITS ******** 2

NO. OF SOIL LAYERS *************** 16
NO. OF DIFFERENT SOILS *********** 4
TOP OF EXISTING FILL ELEVATION *** 24.00
TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION ****** 24.00
GROUND WATER ELEVATION************ 22.00
UNIT WEIGHT OF WATER ************* 10.0000
MOIST UNIT WT.OF EXISTING FILL *** .0000
SAT. UNIT WT. OF EXISTING FILL *** .0000
0UNIT NO. TOP BOUNDARY BOTTOM BOUNDARY DRAINAGE CONDITION

1 1 2 2
2 2 17 1
0MAT.NO. UNIT WT. VOID CC CCS CV CVS

1 19.000 1.000 .020 .004 20.000 200.000
2 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
3 18.000 1.000 .100 .015 3.000 30.000
4 19.000 1.000 .060 .012 5.000 50.000
0LAYER BOTTOM EL. UNIT WT. VOID CC CCS CV CVS

1 23.00 19.000 1.000 .020 .004 20.000 200.000
2 22.50 19.000 1.000 .020 .004 20.000 200.000
3 22.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
4 21.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
5 20.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
6 19.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
7 18.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
8 17.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
9 16.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
10 15.00 18.000 1.000 .170 .040 3.000 30.000
11 14.00 18.000 1.000 .100 .015 3.000 30.000
12 13.00 18.000 1.000 .100 .015 3.000 30.000
13 12.00 18.000 1.000 .100 .015 3.000 30.000
14 11.00 18.000 1.000 .100 .015 3.000 30.000
15 6.00 19.000 1.000 .060 .012 5.000 50.000
16 .00 19.000 1.000 .060 .012 5.000 50.000
0LAYER CENTER EL. THICKNESS OVERBN.PRESS. PRECON.PRESS.

1 23.50 1.00 9.500 9.500
2 22.75 .50 23.750 23.750
3 22.25 .50 33.000 269.500
4 21.50 1.00 41.500 312.000
5 20.50 1.00 49.500 352.000
6 19.50 1.00 57.500 392.000
7 18.50 1.00 65.500 432.000
8 17.50 1.00 73.500 472.000
9 16.50 1.00 81.500 512.000
10 15.50 1.00 89.500 552.000
11 14.50 1.00 97.500 592.000
12 13.50 1.00 105.500 632.000
13 12.50 1.00 113.500 672.000
14 11.50 1.00 121.500 712.000
15 8.50 5.00 148.000 844.500
16 3.00 6.00 197.500 1107.000
0NUMBER OF CASES TO BE ANALYSED *** 1
0*** LOAD CASE NO. 1 ***
0*** LOAD OPTION NO. 5 ******* PLACEMENT OR REMOVAL OF CIRCULAR AREAL FILL ****
0NEW FILL ELEVATION 43.90

0CHANGE IN THICKNESS 19.90
0UNIT WT. OF FILL (MOIST) 10.00
0UNIT WT. OF FILL (SATURATED) 10.00
0DIAMETER = 20.00 DISTANCE/RADIUS = .00

0BOUYANCY EFFECT OPTION = 0
0TIME INTERVALS .100 .200 .500 1.000 2.000 4.000

10.000 20.000 50.000
0LAYER THICK VOID CC CS INITIAL PRECONSOL FINAL ULT.SETTL. OF

NESS RATIO PRESSURE PRESSURE PRESSURE EACH LAYER
1 1.00 1.00 .02 .00 9.50 9.50 208.48 .013
2 .50 1.00 .02 .00 23.75 23.75 222.37 .005
3 .50 1.00 .17 .04 33.00 269.50 230.98 .008
4 1.00 1.00 .17 .04 41.50 312.00 237.66 .015
5 1.00 1.00 .17 .04 49.50 352.00 241.33 .014
6 1.00 1.00 .17 .04 57.50 392.00 242.75 .013
7 1.00 1.00 .17 .04 65.50 432.00 242.23 .011
8 1.00 1.00 .17 .04 73.50 472.00 240.29 .010
9 1.00 1.00 .17 .04 81.50 512.00 237.52 .009
10 1.00 1.00 .17 .04 89.50 552.00 234.44 .008
11 1.00 1.00 .10 .01 97.50 592.00 231.48 .003
12 1.00 1.00 .10 .01 105.50 632.00 228.94 .003
13 1.00 1.00 .10 .01 113.50 672.00 226.99 .002
14 1.00 1.00 .10 .01 121.50 712.00 225.75 .002
15 5.00 1.00 .06 .01 148.00 844.50 228.93 .006
16 6.00 1.00 .06 .01 197.50 1107.00 250.04 .004
0ULTIMATE SETTLEMENT WITHOUT CORRECTION FOR BOUYANCY EFFECT IS .126
0 TIME SETTLEMENT ACCUM.TIME ACCUM.SETTL. SURFACE EL.

.10 .047 .100 .047 43.853
.20 .060 .200 .060 43.840
.50 .081 .500 .081 43.819
1.00 .097 1.000 .097 43.803
2.00 .111 2.000 .111 43.789
4.00 .121 4.000 .121 43.779
10.00 .126 10.000 .126 43.774
20.00 .127 20.000 .127 43.773
50.00 .127 50.000 .127 43.773
0COMPLETE TIME SETTLEMENT RECORD
0 TIME SETTLEMENT
.100 .0468
.200 .0596
.500 .0809
1.000 .0973
2.000 .1115
4.000 .1214
10.000 .1263
20.000 .1266
50.000 .1266
GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix G Shallow Foundation

4b1424cd4ebdfb4%1dg1hhdedh
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 96 *69 69 969
5 (-01) 7 86 862 86 868
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *68 *68 26
34567 89:; <6=>? <6=>? @AA6B>:C6 D9:EF74>:9 G76B9HI9;J K;45 K;45 LH:>:4; LHB764I6 M9>4;F@AAJ<6=>?FA79N 34567 OPI6>>;6N6H>F OPI6>>;6N6H>F OPI6>>;6N6H>F OPI6>>;6N6H>F
Q9R M?:BS A79N >9 TH:>FU>J V69W =76IIT76 K7 KB I>76II :HFI>76II I>76II IT7A4B6 I6>>;6N6H> XNYXN XJZNYXJZN [NY[N [JZNY[JZN
VNW VNW VNW VSQ\N]W VI4HE^_W VSQ\N[W VSG4W VSG4W VSG4W VNW VNNW VNNW VNNW VNNW VNNW
8 96* 969 96* 69 86999 8 969`9 96299 8*6* `68a 26 a 96* 96 86 862 86 868
869 96* 86* 69 86999 29 969`9 96299 9 8968` 968` 8 a68 8962 8262 8a6 862
869 86* 6* 69 86999 * 969`9 96299 6a 6a 68 6 *62 a62 6
2 869 6* 6* `69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 86*2 26*2 96 86 68 69 269
* 869 6* 26* `69 86999 9* 969 9 9699 28 96̀` 286̀` 2 96 96 869 86 68
869 26* *6* `69 86999 2* 969 9 9699 2 96*a 26*a * 96 96 96* 96̀ 868
a 869 *6* 6* `69 86999 `* 969 9 9699 *a 9629 *a629 968 968 96 962 96
` 869 6* a6* `69 86999 * 969 9 9699 * 96 *6 a 968 968 968 96 96
bd
2c860i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 8*6* 8969 0*6* 16*
5 (-23) 7 86 864 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *68 *69 *69
56789 :;<= >8?@A >8?@A BCC8D@<E8 F;<GH96@<; I98D;JK;=L M=67 M=67 NJ<@<6= NJD986K8 O;@6=HBCCL>8?@AHC9;P 56789 QRK8@@=8P8J@H QRK8@@=8P8J@H QRK8@@=8P8J@H QRK8@@=8P8J@H
S;T OA<DU C9;P @; VJ<@HW@L X8;Y ?98KKV98 M9 MD K@98KK <JHK@98KK K@98KK KV9C6D8 K8@@=8P8J@ ZP[ZP ZL\P[ZL\P ]P[]P ]L\P[]L\P
XPY XPY XPY XUS^P_Y XK6JG`aY XUS^P]Y XUI6Y XUI6Y XUI6Y XPY XPPY XPPY XPPY XPPY XPPY
8 96* 969 96* 069 86999 * 96949 9699 8 8 699 84*699 96* 8 6 86 864 86 86
869 96* 86* 069 86999 8* 96949 9699 * 4*6*4 196*4 8 69 8*68 864 64 464
869 86* 6* 069 86999 8 * 96949 9699 846 * 416 * 6 68 68 8860 86
4 869 6* 6* 069 86999 9* 96949 9699 48 601 41601 86 6 46 6 16
* 869 6* 46* 069 86999 4* 96949 9699 4 64 *64 4 961 86* 6* 6 46
869 46* *6* 069 86999 0* 96949 9699 *1 6** *6** * 964 96 86* 68 61
1 869 *6* 6* 069 86999 * 96949 9699 * 8610 610 96 96* 960 86 86
0 869 6* 16* 069 86999 * 96949 9699 1 868 1468 1 96 96 964 96 960
869 16* 06* 069 86999 49* 96949 9699 08 8699 0699 0 968 968 96 96 96
bd
2c62i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 069 169 *869 086*
5 (-23) 7 86 868 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *68 06 *69 *69
45678 9:;< =7>?@ =7>?@ ABB7C?;D7 E:;FG85?;: H87C:IJ:<K L<56 L<56 MI;?;5< MIC875J7 N:?5<GABBK=7>?@GB8:O 45678 PQJ7??<7O7I?G PQJ7??<7O7I?G PQJ7??<7O7I?G PQJ7??<7O7I?G
R:S N@;CT B8:O ?: UI;?GV?K W7:X >87JJU87 L8 LC J?87JJ ;IGJ?87JJ J?87JJ JU8B5C7 J7??<7O7I? YOZYO YK[OZYK[O \OZ\O \K[OZ\K[O
WOX WOX WOX WTR]O^X WJ5IF_`X WTR]O\X WTH5X WTH5X WTH5X WOX WOOX WOOX WOOX WOOX WOOX
8 96* 969 96* 169 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 1a608 89 608 96* 806 86 868 86 86
869 96* 86* 169 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * 86* * 6* 8 896 8a68 860 61 6a
869 86* 6* 169 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8968 068 6* 6* 6* 886 86a
0 869 6* 6* 169 86999 9* 969 9 9699 08 06aa 0*6aa 860 69 06 *61 6
* 869 6* 06* 169 86999 0* 969 9 9699 0 6a *86a 0 96a 86 6* 6 6
869 06* *6* 169 86999 1* 969 9 9699 *a 86aa *16aa * 960 96 860 861 6
a 869 *6* 6* 169 86999 * 96909 9699 * 86 6 96 96* 961 869 86
1 869 6* a6* 169 86999 * 96909 9699 a 968 a68 a 968 96 96* 96 961
869 a6* 16* 169 86999 09* 96909 9699 18 96a9 186a9 1 968 96 96 960 96*
89 869 16* 6* 169 86999 00* 96909 9699 1 96** 16** 968 968 96 96 96
88 869 6* 896* 169 86999 01* 96909 9699 a 960* a60* 89 969 968 968 96 96
8 869 896* 886* 169 86999 ** 96909 9699 89* 96a 89*6a 88 969 969 969 968 968
bd
2c62i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 6* 016* * 6* 1069
5 (-23) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 a60 89a60 96* 816 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * 61 *061 8 896a 8 61 869 6 68
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8961 161 6 *6 a61 6 886
1 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 969 9 9699 18 16a 1*6a 86* 69 6 169 160
* 869 6* 16* 69 86999 1a 9699 96899 16* 6a8 *68 1 96 96* 96a 868 861
869 16* *6* 69 86999 9699 96899 *a6* 86a8 968 * 968 96 96* 96 960
0 869 *6* 6* 69 86999 a 9699 96899 06* 860 a600 968 968 96 96 961
a 869 6* 06* 69 86999 a 9699 96899 0 6* 96 0061 0 968 968 968 968 96
bd
2c162i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 *69 0869 *69 6
5 (-12) 7 86 86 868 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 36 *68
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 aa63 89063 96* 836* 86 86 868 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * 86 * 6 8 8960 8 6a 86 6* 6*
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8960 360 6* 68 69 896 868
3 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 969 9 9699 38 36a 3*6a 863 6 369 *69 69
* 869 6* 36* a69 86999 3* 969 9 9699 3 60 *860 3 960 868 86a 6 6a
869 36* *6* a69 86999 a* 969 9 9699 *0 860a *a60a * 963 963 960 96a 869
bd
2c*61i
Program CONSOL- Version 5.91 (MS-DOS)
0Lotte Titan TE3 - Tank Settlement - 20m Dia.
NO. OF COMPRESSIBLE UNITS ******** 2

NO. OF SOIL LAYERS *************** 14
NO. OF DIFFERENT SOILS *********** 3
TOP OF EXISTING FILL ELEVATION *** 13.00
TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION ****** 13.00
GROUND WATER ELEVATION************ 11.00
UNIT WEIGHT OF WATER ************* 10.0000
MOIST UNIT WT.OF EXISTING FILL *** .0000
SAT. UNIT WT. OF EXISTING FILL *** .0000
0UNIT NO. TOP BOUNDARY BOTTOM BOUNDARY DRAINAGE CONDITION

1 1 2 2
2 2 15 1
0MAT.NO. UNIT WT. VOID CC CCS CV CVS

1 19.000 1.000 .020 .004 20.000 200.000
2 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
3 18.000 1.000 .200 .040 3.000 30.000
0LAYER BOTTOM EL. UNIT WT. VOID CC CCS CV CVS

1 12.00 19.000 1.000 .020 .004 20.000 200.000
2 11.50 19.000 1.000 .020 .004 20.000 200.000
3 11.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
4 10.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
5 9.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
6 8.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
7 7.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
8 6.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
9 5.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
10 4.00 18.000 1.000 .300 .060 3.000 30.000
11 3.00 18.000 1.000 .200 .040 3.000 30.000
12 2.00 18.000 1.000 .200 .040 3.000 30.000
13 1.00 18.000 1.000 .200 .040 3.000 30.000
14 .00 18.000 1.000 .200 .040 3.000 30.000
0LAYER CENTER EL. THICKNESS OVERBN.PRESS. PRECON.PRESS.

1 12.50 1.00 9.500 9.500
2 11.75 .50 23.750 23.750
3 11.25 .50 33.000 165.000
4 10.50 1.00 41.500 207.500
5 9.50 1.00 49.500 247.500
6 8.50 1.00 57.500 287.500
7 7.50 1.00 65.500 327.500
8 6.50 1.00 73.500 367.500
9 5.50 1.00 81.500 407.500
10 4.50 1.00 89.500 447.500
11 3.50 1.00 97.500 487.500
12 2.50 1.00 105.500 527.500
13 1.50 1.00 113.500 567.500
14 .50 1.00 121.500 607.500
0NUMBER OF CASES TO BE ANALYSED *** 1

0*** LOAD CASE NO. 1 ***
0*** LOAD OPTION NO. 5 ******* PLACEMENT OR REMOVAL OF CIRCULAR AREAL FILL ****
0NEW FILL ELEVATION 32.90

0CHANGE IN THICKNESS 19.90
0UNIT WT. OF FILL (MOIST) 10.00
0UNIT WT. OF FILL (SATURATED) 10.00
0DIAMETER = 20.00 DISTANCE/RADIUS = .00

0BOUYANCY EFFECT OPTION = 0
0TIME INTERVALS .100 .200 .500 1.000 2.000 4.000

10.000 20.000 50.000
0LAYER THICK VOID CC CS INITIAL PRECONSOL FINAL ULT.SETTL. OF

NESS RATIO PRESSURE PRESSURE PRESSURE EACH LAYER
1 1.00 1.00 .02 .00 9.50 9.50 208.48 .013
2 .50 1.00 .02 .00 23.75 23.75 222.37 .005
3 .50 1.00 .30 .06 33.00 165.00 230.98 .021
4 1.00 1.00 .30 .06 41.50 207.50 237.66 .030
5 1.00 1.00 .30 .06 49.50 247.50 241.33 .021
6 1.00 1.00 .30 .06 57.50 287.50 242.75 .019
7 1.00 1.00 .30 .06 65.50 327.50 242.23 .017
8 1.00 1.00 .30 .06 73.50 367.50 240.29 .015
9 1.00 1.00 .30 .06 81.50 407.50 237.52 .014
10 1.00 1.00 .30 .06 89.50 447.50 234.44 .013
11 1.00 1.00 .20 .04 97.50 487.50 231.48 .008
12 1.00 1.00 .20 .04 105.50 527.50 228.94 .007
13 1.00 1.00 .20 .04 113.50 567.50 226.99 .006
14 1.00 1.00 .20 .04 121.50 607.50 225.75 .005
0ULTIMATE SETTLEMENT WITHOUT CORRECTION FOR BOUYANCY EFFECT IS .194
0 TIME SETTLEMENT ACCUM.TIME ACCUM.SETTL. SURFACE EL.

.10 .056 .100 .056 32.844
.20 .073 .200 .073 32.827
.50 .106 .500 .106 32.794
1.00 .139 1.000 .139 32.761
2.00 .169 2.000 .169 32.731
4.00 .187 4.000 .187 32.713
10.00 .193 10.000 .193 32.707
20.00 .193 20.000 .193 32.707
50.00 .193 50.000 .193 32.707
0COMPLETE TIME SETTLEMENT RECORD
0 TIME SETTLEMENT
.100 .0562
.200 .0734
.500 .1057
1.000 .1395
2.000 .1687
4.000 .1872
10.000 .1932
20.000 .1933
50.000 .1933

!"#

$
%
&
%#'

,

!"#$% "&

!"# !%
'
( ()

' )* % +'+,
-.
' / 0$% "&

1 > *

-2 1 1 3..!4 5 /!' 2 2 2 # 6 6! ..' . -2 3*
. $' 78 / ! 4 9! #.! # # #
78 78 7"&8 7%8 7/8 7: ";8 7/8 7/8 7": 8 7": 8 78 78 78 78

'
',
' < &,'
,
'+,
<' '=, '

', ' &'+

', '
+'
' = ' '& ,&'
'&&
<' &
'=, ='&
' ,'+ ,='
& ' &' +'
' &
' '& '<
'&
=
'= ',
&' +<'< , '& ,&'
< &' <' +'
' &, ' '& ='<
'
=='& &',
' =
' <<'
<<'=
, <' ,' +'
' & ' '& =+'<
&' <
+
'< <',
' ,'
&'= &='
,' ' +'
' <& ' '& +'< +'<
+<'+ ,', ' <+' ' &'&
= ' =' +'
' <= ' '& <'< ',
+='&, ', +' &+'& &'= <'
+ =' +' +'

' ,
' '&
'< +',
+'&, =', +' '&
+'
+'<
+' ' +'
' ,, ' '&
'< +'==

'
= +', ='
'&
&'
&'<

'
' '
' ,, '< '
+' =<'=
&',= ', <'
<' +'+ +'

'
' '
' < '< '
=' +'=
'
', &'= ' ' '&

'
' '
' +, '< '
&' &' , '
,
', &'& ' &' &'

&
'
&' '
' =& '< '
<,' ,+'
<'
', ' '
'+
'+
6#3()',)'>

!"#

$
%
&
%#'

<

!"#$% "&

!"# !%
'
( ()

' )* %
'+
,-
.' / 0$% "&

1 > *

,2 1 1 3--!4 5 /!' 2 2 2 # 6 6! --' - ,2 3*
- $' 78 / ! 4 9! #-! # # #
78 78 7"&8 7%8 7/8 7: ";8 7/8 7/8 7": 8 7": 8 78 78 78 78

'
'<
' . &<'
<
.'+.
=<' '=<
'
'
=&' =.'

'< '
+'
' = ' '& <&'
.'
+
.'+
'=< +'&
=' ' ='+
& ' &' +'
' &
' '& '.
&+'+
' '<
<'& '
'= '
. &' .' +'
' &< ' '& ='.
&<'+ ' &'<
.' +.'& < '& <&'
< .' <' +'
' & ' '& =+'.
&
'
'< .'<
'+ ='& .&' ..'
<' ' +'
' .& ' '& +'.
<'
&
'<& <'<
'= <='< &<'= &'
= ' =' +'

' .= ' '& .'.
+'
'. '<
' .<' +'. +'+
+ =' +' +'
' <
' '&
'.
'.=
'+= ='< '< &<'&
' '
+' ' +'
' << ' '&
'.
'
&' +'< +' <'=
'
'

'
' '
' << '. '
+' .'+
&'= '< <'

='
'=
'+

'
' '
' . '. '
=' +='.
<'&
'< .'<
'
='< ='

'
' '
' +< '. '
&' +'&
='
'< .' =' .'= .'+

&
'
&' '
' =& '. '
.<' =&'+

'=

'< &' &' ' '
6#3()'=)'>

!"#

$
%
&
%#'

<

!"#$% "&

!"# !%
'
( ()

' )* %
+'
,-
.' / 0$% "&

1 > *

,2 1 1 3--!4 5 /!' 2 2 2 # 6 6! --' - ,2 3*
- $' 78 / ! 4 9! #-! # # #
78 78 7"&8 7%8 7/8 7: ";8 7/8 7/8 7": 8 7": 8 78 78 78 78

'
'<
' + &<'
<
.'.& &'. '=<
'
&&'= . ' .+'

'< '
.'
' = ' '& <&'
.'&
'&
'=< '

'< =<'& ='&
& ' &' .'
' &
' '& '+
'+ .'. '<
'
'& ' ='<

+ &' +' .'
' &< ' '& ='+
'.
&&'
&'<
<' <'& <'
<'
< +' <' .'
' & ' '& =.'+
<=' & &<'& +'<
+'& ='= +'+ <'
<' ' .'

' +& ' '& .'+
<' &'+ <'<
&'
<'+ +'< +
'
= ' =' .'

' += ' '& +'+
+
'< &<' '<
' < '& & '+ & '.

. =' .' .'
' <
' '&
'+
& '+ &+'. ='<
'. +'& <' <'&
.' ' .'
' << ' '&
'+
&' &&'+ .'< '. '<
.'&
.'

'
' '
' << '+ '
.'
&'= & ' '< <'.

'.
'&
'+

'
' '
' + '+ '
='
+'== & '=
'< <'
&' .' .'.

'
' '
' .< '+ '
&' '& &&'
'< +' .'= <'+ <'<

&
'
&' '
' =& '+ '
+<' ..'+. &+'&.
'< +'
+'
' '
6#3()'.&)'>

0123145678512)3*884*+*283)),*2*78-))0*28.*))1/))05.0047.1))025/1.+42))4176*61
/118523))/1026*6))78))8-*))30./70*4
536778696:7;)<=8<>8=76?)@AB);=:?;)C)<8=D;)E:)8=D6B;F
GHI)JKLMN)OPQRS
TKUMNORPQRP)
VWXUXMNVHYXMZM)VKZ[)\HYZ]KUWHZ
^_M`N aYb c`Y_dM])`He[)f)gKZ])YZWU)hU)i[JfLj )S
c`Y_dM])`He[)f)gKZ])UdWe[)iL )k)
lH`MdHXMN lmS
\HYZ]KUWHZ)]WKLMUM`N QOkO LMÙM VKZ[)mMWndU)iL )oko
pHK])HZ)qHYZ]KUWHZN )SrkS [sK tKUM`)YZWU)hU)i[JfLj )O
TMuUd \XMWIXM ))))aWnW]
pKvM` TMuUd TMuUd wqqMeUWxMyHW])`KUWH s`MeHZ_HXk cXKv cXKv cXKv gKZ] zZWUWKX zZe`MK_M VHUKX)Mqqk q̀HL pKvM` cMZÙM w]nM
JYLIM` q̀HL UH YZWU)hUk {MH| s`M__Y`M c` ce Lx }e _ÙM__ WZ)_ÙM__ _ÙM__ gY`qKeM gMUUXMLMZU))))))))))gMUUXMLMZU )gMUUXMLMZU
{L| {L| {[JfLj|{_KZ]iO| {[sK| {L~QfJ| {[sK| {[sK| {[JfL~Q| {[JfL~Q| {L| {LL| {LL| {LL|
) OkO )k )SkO OOO jk) )SrkrQ QjjkSo Oko )jkQ )oko S)kR SQkr
Q )k QkO )rkO )kOOO QoO OkORO OkjOO jkS )Sokrr Q)kor )ko )OkO )jkR rjk rkR
j QkO jkO rkO )kOOO j)Q OkORO OkjOO RQk )SRkOR QrkR Qk )rk )Qk ookQ orkQ
jkO kO rkO )kOOO jQ OkORO OkjOO oOk )S)koj QRQk)j jk )ok) )ORkO Rko RRkR
kO kO rkO )kOOO jSQ OkORO OkjOO ork )rk)R QRjkR k )kr rrkS k) kr
R kO RkO rkO )kOOO jQ OkORO OkjOO rRk )oRkR QRjkO k )k ojk) kj kS
o RkO okO rkO )kOOO oQ OkORO OkjOO Sk )RRkoO QR)k)O Rk )jkj rkR jRkj jRkr
r okO rkO rkO )kOOO )Q OkORO OkjOO )OQk )kS Qrkj ok )Qk) kj Qrk) Qrk
S rkO SkO rkO )kOOO Q OkORO OkjOO ))Ok )kro QkQo rk )OkS jjkj QOkR QOkS
)O SkO )OkO SkO )kOOO S OkOO OkQOO ))rkS )jjkS) QQkr) Sk RkR QQkj )jkS )kO
)) )OkO ))kO SkO )kOOO RO OkOO OkQOO )QokS )Qjkjo Q)kQo )Ok kS )kr Skr SkS
)Q ))kO )QkO SkO )kOOO Rr OkOO OkQOO )jRkS ))jkj QOkjj ))k kQ SkS RkQ RkQ
)j )QkO )jkO SkO )kOOO ojO OkOO OkQOO )kS )OkQO QOk)O )Qk ko ko QkS QkS
czagwVPlmSkX_
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 069 1969 *69 06*
5 (-23) 7 868 860 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 06 *68 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 a1608 89 608 96* 806 868 860 86 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * 86* * 6* 8 896 8 6 86* 61 6
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8968 068 6* 6 6 8869 860
0 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 969 9 9699 08 0611 0*611 860 6a 060 *60 60
* 869 6* 06* a69 86999 0* 969 9 9699 0 61 *861 0 961 86 6 6a 60
869 06* *6* a69 86999 a* 96909 9699 *1 8611 *a611 * 96 96 869 86 861
1 869 *6* 6* a69 86999 * 96909 9699 * 86 6 96 960 96 96a 869
a 869 6* 16* a69 86999 * 96909 9699 1 968 168 1 968 96 96 96* 96
869 16* a6* a69 86999 09* 96909 9699 a8 9619 a8619 a 968 968 96 96 96
89 96* a6* 69 a69 86999 0* 96909 9699 a1 96*a a16*a a61* 969 969 969 968 968
bd
2c 62i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 69 0169 * 69 1 6*
5 (-23) 7 868 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 16 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 a60 89a60 96* 8160 868 86 86 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * 60 *060 8 896a 8 61 869 6 6
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 896a 16a 6 *6 a61 8969 8861
1 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 96919 9699 18 16a0 1*6a0 869 69 6 168 *69
* 869 6* 16* a69 86999 1* 96919 9699 1 60 *860 1 96* 869 860 6 60
869 16* *6* a69 86999 a* 96919 9699 *0 86a9 *a6a9 * 96 96* 96 86 86*
0 869 *6* 6* a69 86999 * 96919 9699 * 86 6 96 96 96* 96 96a
a 869 6* 06* a69 86999 * 96919 9699 0 96 06 0 968 968 96 96 96
bd
2c062i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 8 86* 6*
5$5-5#$5(./) 7 069 169 *869 086*
5 (-23) 7 86 868 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *68 06 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* 169 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 1a608 89 608 96* 806 86 868 86 86
869 96* 86* 169 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * 86* * 6* 8 896 8a68 860 61 6a
869 86* 6* 169 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8968 068 6* 6* 6* 886 86a
0 869 6* 6* 169 86999 9* 969 9 9699 08 06aa 0*6aa 860 69 06 *61 6
* 869 6* 06* 169 86999 0* 969 9 9699 0 6a *86a 0 96a 86 6* 6 6
869 06* *6* 169 86999 1* 969 9 9699 *a 86aa *16aa * 960 96 860 861 6
a 869 *6* 6* 169 86999 * 96909 9699 * 86 6 96 96* 961 869 86
1 869 6* a6* 169 86999 * 96909 9699 a 968 a68 a 968 96 96* 96 961
869 a6* 16* 169 86999 09* 96909 9699 18 96a9 186a9 1 968 96 96 960 96*
89 869 16* 6* 169 86999 00* 96909 9699 1 96** 16** 968 968 96 96 96
88 869 6* 896* 169 86999 01* 96909 9699 a 960* a60* 89 969 968 968 96 96
8 869 896* 886* 169 86999 ** 96909 9699 89* 96a 89*6a 88 969 969 969 968 968
bd
2c162i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 -6 869 8262 8.6-
5 (/34) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *68 *69 -6
8 96* 969 96* 69 86999 8 96929 96-99 8*6* 62. 6. 96* 8 6- 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* 69 86999 -9 96929 96-99 9 8692 692 8 26. 8-6 826 96 6
869 86* 6* 69 86999 * 96929 96-99 699 699 6 68 26 8868 862
- 869 6* 6* 269 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 6- 6- 86 6* -68 *6* 6.
* 869 6* -6* 269 86999 9* 969 9 9699 -8 862 -62 - 96 86 6 68 -69
869 -6* *6* 269 86999 -* 969 9 9699 - 86 *96 * 96 96. 86 862 6
. 869 *6* 6* 269 86999 2* 969 9 9699 *. 96- *.6- 96 96- 96 96 86
2 869 6* .6* 269 86999 * 969 9 9699 * 96.9 *6.9 . 968 968 96 96- 96*
bd
2c8
!&63i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 89969 .269 869 *86
5 (/34) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* 269 86999 * 969-9 9699 8 *622 88-622 96* 8868 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* 269 86999 8* 969-9 9699 * *6*- ..6*- 8 62 968 -69 *69 *6*
869 86* 6* 269 86999 8 * 969-9 9699 -689 *.689 -62 896 86 8*6* 8 6
- 869 6* 6* 269 86999 9* 969-9 9699 -8 8698 *-698 6- *6* 268 6 896.
* 869 6* -6* 269 86999 -* 969-9 9699 - .6- * 6- - 86 68 -6 69 6
869 -6* *6* 269 86999 2* 969-9 9699 *. *6 6 * 962 862 6 6. -6
. 869 *6* 6* 269 86999 * 969-9 9699 * 6. 26. 96* 869 86. 6 6
2 869 6* .6* 269 86999 * 969-9 9699 . 629 .*629 . 96 96 96 86 86*
869 .6* 26* 269 86999 -9* 969-9 9699 28 68. 268. 2 96 96 96- 96* 96
bd
2c
!&63i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 *69 --6 *6- 969
5 (/23) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 6 a86 96* 6* 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * -68* *68* 8 886 86. 6- -6* *69
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8*6 . -a6 . *68 896* 86a 8-6* 8*6.
- 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 969 9 9699 -8 a6-* -6-* 6- *6- .6 a6. 6a
* 869 6* -6* a69 86999 -* 969 9 9699 - *68 *-68 - 86 69 -6 *6 68
869 -6* *6* a69 86999 a* 969 9 9699 *. 6-- 96-- * 96a 86. 6- 6 6a
. 869 *6* 6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 * 6-* .6-* 96 96 86- 86a 6
a 869 6* .6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 . 86a .-6a . 96 96 96 86 86*
869 .6* a6* a69 86999 -9* 969-9 9699 a8 86-8 a6-8 a 968 96- 96 96a 869
89 869 a6* 6* a69 86999 --* 969-9 9699 a 868 968 968 96 96- 96* 96.
88 869 6* 896* a69 86999 -a* 969-9 9699 . 968 .68 89 968 968 96 96 96-
8 869 896* 886* a69 86999 ** 969-9 9699 89* 96. 89*6. 88 968 968 968 968 96
bd
2c
!&62i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 .69 *86 -862 6
5 (/34) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* 269 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 69 2269 96* 8969 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* 269 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * .62 62 8 869 86 62 6. -6
869 86* 6* 269 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8.6* *96* *6* 6 886 86* 86*
- 869 6* 6* 269 86999 9* 969 9 9699 -8 6 *96 6. 6. -6 *62 6
* 869 6* -6* 69 86999 -2 9699 96899 -6* *6. **6 - 96* 869 86* 86 6
869 -6* *6* 69 86999 9699 96899 *26* 628 68 * 96 96 962 868 86
. 869 *6* 6* 69 86999 2 9699 96899 .6* 6.8 .968 96 96 96- 96 96.
2 869 6* .6* 69 86999 2 9699 96899 . 6* 69 .26* . 968 968 96 96 96
bd
2c-
!&63i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 269 -.6 26 6
5 (/34) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* 269 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 *69 2-69 96* 6. 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* 269 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * *6. 96. 8 886 86* 6 -68 -6.
869 86* 6* 269 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8 6 -6 *6 8969 868 86 8-6
- 869 6* 6* 269 86999 9* 969 9 9699 -8 262- -62- 6* -6. 6 .6- 26
* 869 6* -6* 269 86999 -* 969 9 9699 - *6-9 *-6-9 - 86- 6 69 6. -6
869 -6* *6* 269 86999 2* 969 9 9699 *. 6 9 96 9 * 962 962 868 86- 86.
bd
2c*
!&63i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 6- - 69 6 86-
5 (/23) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 6 . a6 . 96* 6 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * -6a *6a 8 886- 86 6 -6 -6
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8 699 -699 *6 896 86* 8-68 8*6
- 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 969 9 9699 -8 a6 - -6 - 6* *68 6a a68 68
* 869 6* -6* a69 86999 -* 969 9 9699 - *6. *-6. - 86 6 6 -6* *6
869 -6* *6* a69 86999 a* 969-9 9699 *. 6* 96* * 96* 86 86a 6- 6
. 869 *6* 6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 * 6*9 .6*9 96 96a 868 86* 86a
a 869 6* .6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 . 86a .-6a . 96 96- 96 96 868
869 .6* a6* a69 86999 -9* 969-9 9699 a8 86-- a6-- a 96 96 96 96- 96*
89 96* a6* 69 a69 86999 -* 969-9 9699 a. 868 aa68 a6.* 968 968 968 968 96
bd
2c
!&62i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 .86- *96- -96. *6
5 (/23) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 a6- a.6- 96* 6 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * .6* 6* 8 886 86 6 6a -6-
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8.68 *968 *6* 6 886- 86a 86
- 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 969-9 9699 -8 6 *96 86a 6 *6 6 .6
* 869 6* -6* a69 86999 -* 969-9 9699 - *6 . *-6 . - 869 68 69 6a -6-
869 -6* *6* a69 86999 a* 969-9 9699 *. 6.a 96.a * 96 868 86. 6 6
. 869 *6* 6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 * 6 .6 96- 96 96 86 86-
a 869 6* .6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 . 699 .*699 . 96 96 96- 96* 96
bd
2c.
!&62i
012456 7 89

0124 7 5

114 7
!"#!$7
%5#$5$&'( ) 86* !7 8
%5#$5+$'( ) 7 8 86* 6* 5!!7 9
%5#$5,'( ) 7 -6* .6*
5$5/5#$5(01) 7 *69 --6 *6 969
5 (/23) 7 86 86 86 86
5 (!,$) 7 *69 *69 *69 *69
8 96* 969 96* a69 86999 * 969 9 9699 8 6 a86 96* 6* 86 86 86 86
869 96* 86* a69 86999 8* 969 9 9699 * -68* *68* 8 886 86. 6- -6- 6.
869 86* 6* a69 86999 8 * 969 9 9699 8*6 . -a6 . *68 896* 86a 8-6* 86.
- 869 6* 6* a69 86999 9* 969 9 9699 -8 a6-* -6-* 6- *6- .6 a6 6
* 869 6* -6* a69 86999 -* 969 9 9699 - *68 *-68 - 86 69 -6 *6 6
869 -6* *6* a69 86999 a* 969 9 9699 *. 6-- 96-- * 96a 86. 6- 68 6
. 869 *6* 6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 * 6-* .6-* 96 96 86- 86a 86
a 869 6* .6* a69 86999 * 969-9 9699 . 86a .-6a . 96 96 96 86 96a
869 .6* a6* a69 86999 -9* 969-9 9699 a8 86-8 a6-8 a 968 96- 96 96a 96*
89 869 a6* 6* a69 86999 --* 969-9 9699 a 868 968 968 96 96- 96* 96
88 869 6* 896* a69 86999 -a* 969-9 9699 . 968 .68 89 968 968 96 96 96
8 869 896* 886* a69 86999 ** 969-9 9699 89* 96. 89*6. 88 968 968 968 968 968
bd
2ca
!&62i
Project : LOTTE-TITAN, TE-3 PROJECT, PASIR GUDANG, JOHOR
Client : MESSRS. GS ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORP. Job No. : GEOLAB
Plate Bearing Test

Point No. PLT-1 Design Pressure = 200 kPa
Date of Test 28-05-2015 Plate Diameter = 300 mm Diameter
Plate Area = 0.071 sq m
Jack Ram Area = 11.04 in2
224
Conversion: Force (kN) = psi
11.04
1 kN = 20.29 psi
Results:
Table 1 : Summary of Test Results for Point No. : PLT-1
Jack Settlement, mm * Cumulative

Mean Bearing % of Design Settlement
Pressure, psi
Jack Force, kN Pressure, kN/m2 Load Gauge 1 Gauge 2 Gauge 3 Gauge 4 Avg (mm)
0.0 0.0 0 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
71.7 3.5 50 25% 1.17 1.61 0.64 0.81 1.06 1.06
143.5 7.1 100 50% 1.54 2.02 0.96 1.26 0.39 1.45
215.2 10.6 150 75% 1.96 2.43 1.41 1.71 0.43 1.88
286.9 14.1 200 100% 2.67 3.17 2.16 2.40 0.72 2.60
215.2 10.6 150 75% 2.62 3.13 2.12 2.10 -0.11 2.49
143.5 7.1 100 50% 2.46 3.04 1.91 2.10 -0.12 2.38
71.7 3.5 50 25% 2.30 2.88 1.74 1.85 -0.19 2.19
0.0 0.0 0 0% 1.49 1.62 0.96 1.09 -0.90 1.29
143.5 7.1 100 50% 2.81 2.32 1.26 2.51 0.94 2.23
286.9 14.1 200 100% 3.61 4.41 2.12 3.42 1.17 3.39
430.4 21.2 300 150% 7.85 8.44 8.52 7.91 4.79 8.18
573.9 28.3 400 200% 10.30 10.93 10.04 10.45 2.25 10.43
430.4 21.2 300 150% 10.18 10.89 9.90 10.22 -0.13 10.30
286.9 14.1 200 100% 9.99 10.78 9.68 9.98 -0.19 10.11
143.5 7.1 100 50% 9.76 10.55 10.48 9.72 0.02 10.13
0 0.0 0 0% 7.98 8.77 7.43 7.63 -2.18 7.95
215.2 10.6 150 75% 9.98 10.62 10.97 9.52 2.32 10.27
430.4 21.2 300 150% 13.52 14.23 14.38 14.95 4.00 14.27
645.6 31.8 450 225% 17.20 18.69 18.84 17.01 3.67 17.94
860.8 42.4 600 300% 20.66 21.84 20.54 20.33 2.91 20.84
645.6 31.8 450 225% 18.00 18.32 18.05 18.81 -2.55 18.30
430.4 21.2 300 150% 16.54 16.95 16.91 17.14 -1.41 16.89
215.2 10.6 150 75% 15.55 15.01 14.78 14.97 -1.81 15.08
0 0.0 0 0% 11.80 13.38 12.21 11.60 -2.83 12.25
* Note : 1. +Ve values indicate Settlement, -Ve values indicate Heave.

2. Settlement = Dial Gauge reading at the end time of each load increment - Reading at the start
of each load increment.
3. For details of each increment, hold dial gauge readings, refer to attached Field Record.
P-1
Plate Bearing Test

Point No. PLT-1 Design Pressure = 200 kPa
224
11.04
1 kN = 20.29 psi
Results:
Mean Bearing Pressure, q (kN/m2)
0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0

0.00 First
Cycle
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k
k=q/δ
k=100*1000/1.5
5.00 k=6.67x104 kN/m3
Mean Settlement, δ (mm)
Second
Cycle
10.00
15.00
Third
Cycle
20.00
25.00
Figure 1 : - Mean Bearing Pressure vs. Mean Settlement for Point PLT-1
Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd

Foundation, Concrete and Soil Specialists
P-1
Plate Bearing Test

Point No. PLT-2 (On The Road) Design Pressure = 200 kPa
224
11.04
1 kN = 20.29 psi
Results:
Table 1 : Summary of Test Results for Point No. : PLT-2 (On The Road)
Jack Settlement, mm * Cumulative

Mean Bearing % of Design Settlement
Pressure, psi
Jack Force, kN Pressure, kN/m2 Load Gauge 1 Gauge 2 Gauge 3 Gauge 4 Avg (mm)
0.0 0.0 0 0% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
71.7 3.5 50 25% 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02
143.5 7.1 100 50% 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04
215.2 10.6 150 75% 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.05
286.9 14.1 200 100% 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.06
215.2 10.6 150 75% 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 -0.01 0.05
143.5 7.1 100 50% 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 -0.01 0.04
71.7 3.5 50 25% 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 -0.01 0.03
0.0 0.0 0 0% 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 -0.02 0.02
143.5 7.1 100 50% 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.05
286.9 14.1 200 100% 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.06
430.4 21.2 300 150% 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.01 0.08
573.9 28.3 400 200% 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.09
430.4 21.2 300 150% 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 -0.01 0.08
286.9 14.1 200 100% 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 -0.02 0.06
143.5 7.1 100 50% 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 -0.01 0.05
0 0.0 0 0% 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 -0.02 0.03
215.2 10.6 150 75% 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.06
430.4 21.2 300 150% 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.09
645.6 31.8 450 225% 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.11
860.8 42.4 600 300% 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.04 0.16
645.6 31.8 450 225% 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.12 -0.03 0.12
430.4 21.2 300 150% 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.12 -0.01 0.11
215.2 10.6 150 75% 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 -0.02 0.09
0 0.0 0 0% 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 -0.02 0.07
* Note : 1. +Ve values indicate Settlement, -Ve values indicate Heave.

2. Settlement = Dial Gauge reading at the end time of each load increment - Reading at the start
of each load increment.
3. For details of each increment, hold dial gauge readings, refer to attached Field Record.
P-2
Plate Bearing Test

Point No. PLT-2 (On The Road) Design Pressure = 200 kPa
224
11.04
1 kN = 20.29 psi
Results:
Mean Bearing Pressure, q (kN/m2)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

0.00
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k
0.02 k=q/δ
k=100*1000/0.048
First
0.04 Cycle k=2.08x106 kN/m3
Mean Settlement, δ (mm)
0.06
Second
Cycle
0.08
0.10
Third
0.12 Cycle
0.14
0.16
0.18
Figure 1 : - Mean Bearing Pressure vs. Mean Settlement for Point PLT-2 (On The Road)
Geolab (M) Sdn Bhd

Foundation, Concrete and Soil Specialists
P-2
GLK-10-269-LCT-001
Appendix H Piled Foundation

012

3 633 833 933
33 5333 5633 5833 5933 5
33
3
!
"!
4 "!
#!
53

54
63
64
73
$%&'()*%&')+',-./)01523.45%627/869:&;2-<.=>
012

3 633 733 833 933 5333 5633 5733 5833
3
2

4
!

53

54
63
64
"#$%&'(#$%')%*+,-'./601,23#405-6478$90+:,;<
012

3 633 833 933
33 5333 5633 5833 5933 5
33
3
!
2!
4 2!
"!
53

54
63
64
73
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0712-34$516.7589%:1,;-<=
012

3 633 733 833 933 5333 5633 5733 5833 5933
3

!

!

4
2

53

54
63
64
"#$%&'(#$%')%*+,-'./701,23#405-6478$90+:,;<
012

3 633 833 933
33 5333 5633 5833 5933 5
33
3
2
!
4 !2
"
53

54
63
64
73
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0412-34$516.7589%:1,;-<=
012

3 633 733 833 933 5333 5633 5733 5833
3

!

!

4
"

53

54
63
64
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0812-34$516.7589%:1,;-<=
012

3 633 733 833 933 5333 5633 5733 5833
3

!

!

4
"

53

54
63
64
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0123-45$627.869:%;2,<-=>
012

3 633 733 833 933 5333 5633 5733 5833
3

!

!

4
"

53

54
63
64
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0912-34$516.7589%:1,;-<=
012

3 633 833 933
33 5333 5633 5833 5933 5
33
3
!
"!
4 "!
#!
53

54
63
64
73
$%&'()*%&')+',-./)01234.56%738/97:;&<3-=.>?
012

3 633 833 933
3
!
" !
4 " !
# !
53

54
63
64
73
$%&'()*%&')+',-./)01523.45%627/8629'6:%,6;<&:2-=.>?
012
9

3 633 733 833
3
2

4
!

53

54
63
64
"#$%&'(#$%')%*+,-'./601,23#405-6407%48#*49:$80+;,<=
012

3 633 833 933
3
!
2 !
4 2 !
" !
53

54
63
64
73
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0712-34$516.7518&59$+5:;%91,<-=>
012
9

3 633 733 833
3

!

!

4
2

53

54
63
64
"#$%&'(#$%')%*+,-'./701,23#405-6407%48#*49:$80+;,<=
012

3 633 833 933
3
2
!
4 !2
"
53

54
63
64
73
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0412-34$516.7518&59$+5:;%91,<-=>
012
9

3 633 733 833
3

!

!

4
"

53

54
63
64
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0812-34$516.7518&59$+5:;%91,<-=>
012
9

3 633 733 833
3

!

!

4
"

53

54
63
64
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0123-45$627.8629&6:$+6;<%:2,=->?
012
9

3 633 733 833
3

!

!

4
"

53

54
63
64
#$%&'()$%&(*&+,-.(/0123-45$627.8629&6:$+6;<%:2,=->?
012

3 633 833 933
33
3
!"!
#!"!
4 #!"!
$!"!
53

54
63
64
73
%&'()*+&'(*,(-./0*12345/67&8490:84;(8<&-8=>'<4.?/@A
0123467389
044734 63 3433272324
$!!
#!!
!!
012346738)*+,
"!!
!
! %! "! &! ! '! #! (!
"!!
!!
044734 63 34332)*+,
-.//0/12/2 -34/20/12/2
0123467389
044734 63 3433272324
$
!
012346738)*+,
"
$ " % ! & ' # (
"
!

044734 63 34332)*+,
-.//0/12/2 -34/20/12/2
0123467389
044734 63 3433272324
%#!!
%$!!
%!!!
!!
"!!
012346738&'()
#!!
$!!
!
! $! #! "! ! %!! %$!
$!!
#!!
"!!
!!
044734 63 34332&'()
*+,,-,./,/ *01,/-,./,/
0123467389
044734 63 3433272324
"
!

012346738&'()
" # $ % " # $
!

044734 63 34332&'()
*+,,-,./,/ *01,/-,./,/

Lotte Titan TE3 Geo RPT Rev 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lotte Titan TE3 Geo RPT Rev 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lotte Titan TE3 Geo RPT Rev 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geotechnical Interpretative Report

Soil Investigation for

Document number: GLK-10-269-LCT-001

The attached document, revised as indicated below is issued herewith.

Originator's Reviewed / Checked

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

8.2. Excavation .......................................................................................................... 37

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

Eu Young’s Modulus of Soil

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

1.1. Scope of Work

The scope of work for this geotechnical interpretation report includes:

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

1.2. Site Description

1.3. Information Provided

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

2. Interpretation of the Soil Investigation

2.1. Site Investigation Scope of Works

2.2. Regional Geology

2.3. Subsurface Soil Profile

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

2.4. Ground Water Table

Table 2.1: Ground Water Table in Boreholes during Soil Investigation

2.5. Geotechnical Design Parameters

Summary of the laboratory testing is presented in Appendix B. Based on the laboratory

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

0-7 mbgl Firm sandy CLAY 5-8 18 7 28 45 10 0.15 0.03 5

In-situ Permeability Tests

Test No. Depth Soil Permebility, K

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

BH9 6m 1.64E-06 m/s

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

11.0m 1600 530 4581.45 0.438 13179.68

2.6. Aggressiveness of Soil & Groundwater to Concrete & Steel

Table 2.6: Classification of Soil Aggressivity Based on Soil Resistivity

Soil Resistivity (ohm cms) Degree of Corrosivity

2.7. Critical Ground Condition

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

3. Seismic Assessment and Liquefaction Potential

3.1. Tectonic and Seismicity

3.2. Liquefaction Potential Assessment

Liquefaction can result in the following:

The conditions contributing to liquefaction are:

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

To minimise the liquefaction potential in “sand-like” material, it is generally recognised

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

Table 2.4: Potentially Liquefiable Zones at the Site

BH Soil Type Depth (N<15) SPT N Remarks

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

4.1. Foundation Design Criteria

4.2. Loading Condition of Tank Foundation

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

4.3. Bearing Capacity of Tank Foundation

Cu = undrained shear strength of soil

File: LOTTE TITAN TE3 GEO RPT REV 1

pt = Tank pressure on subgrade

4.4. Stability of Tank Foundation