Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Scientific Research
University of Zakho
DNA fingerprinting
Subject(molecular biology)
6 th semester
Supervised by
1
Abstract
2
List of contents
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………….2
Introduction ………………………………………………………………………5
DNA profiling……………………………………..……………………………….9
Solving crime………………………………………….……………………….12
References……………………………………………………………………………………………………….16
3
List of figures
4
DNA fingerprinting
The probability of having two people with the same DNA fingerprint
that are not identical twins is very small.
The shorter pieces of DNA moved through the gel easiest and
therefore fastest. It is more difficult for the longer pieces of DNA to
move through the gel so they travelled slower.
As a result, by the time the electric current was switched off, the
DNA pieces had been separated in order of size. The smallest DNA
molecules were furthest away from where the original sample was
loaded on to the gel.
4)Once the DNA had been sorted, the pieces of DNA were
transferred or ‘blotted’ out of the fragile gel on to a robust piece of
nylon membrane and then ‘unzipped’ to produce single strands of
DNA.
6
When exposed to radioactivity a pattern of more than 30 dark bands
appeared on the film where the labelled DNA was. This pattern was
the DNA fingerprint.
7
Illustration showing the steps in DNA fingerprinting. Image credit: Genome Research Limited.
8
DNA profiling
9
of a specific sequence of DNA. It only requires small amounts of
DNA to start with and can even make copies from a DNA sample
that is partially degraded. In PCR small bits of DNA called primers?
10
Illustration showing the steps in DNA profiling. Image credit: Genome Research Limited
The more STR sequences that are tested, the more accurate the
test is at identifying someone.
Other STRs used for forensic purposes are called Y-STRs, which
are derived solely from the male Y chromosome?. This is useful for
identifying a male perpetrator from mixed DNA samples.
11
Only one person in every 10 million million (10,000,000,000,000) will
have a particular STR profile. With the world human population
estimated at only 7,100 million (7,100,000,000) it is therefore
extremely unlikely you will share the same profile as someone else,
unless you are an identical twin.
Solving crime
DNA profiles are very useful in forensics because only a tiny sample
of human material left behind after a crime may be sufficient to
identify someone.
12
A match made between different crime scene profiles indicates a
repeat offender at work.
The police may use this DNA evidence to support other evidence to
help prosecute someone for a crime. Complete DNA profiles give
very reliable matches and may provide strong evidence that a
suspect is guilty or innocent of a crime.
Illustration showing a comparison of a DNA fingerprint from a crime scene and DNA fingerprints
from two suspects. The DNA fingerprint from suspect 2 matches that taken from the crime scene.
Image credit: Genome Research Limited
13
How are DNA profiles stored?
You get half of your DNA from your mother and half from your
father. STRs are therefore passed down from parents to their
children.
DNA profiling can be used to help confirm whether two people are
related to one another and is commonly used to provide evidence
that someone is, or is not, the biological parent of a child.
14
DNA profiling has a high success rate and very low false-positive
rate.
Illustration comparing the DNA profiles of two parents and their child. You can see which STRs in
the child have been inherited from which parent. Image credit: Genome Research Limited.
15
References:
1) Ali S, Muller CR, Epplen JT (1986) DNA fingerprinting by oligonucleotide probes specific
for simple repeats. Hum Genet 74: 239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2) Armour JAL, Patel I, Thein SL, Fey MF, Jeffreys AJ (1989a) Analysis of somatic mutations
at human minisatellite loci in tumours and cell lines. Genomics 4: 328–
334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3) Boerwinkle E, Xiong W, Fourest E, Chan L (1989) Rapid typing of tandemly repeated
mitochondrial DNA directly from PCR products. BioTechniques 13: 82–92Google Scholar
16