032 - Sahil Nemade - MBA - A
032 - Sahil Nemade - MBA - A
032 - Sahil Nemade - MBA - A
-2-5 years)
Very Easy
Very Difficult
ment Department wants to understand concerns of the students regrding need of extra sessions/training for the type of tests which are carried
the companies during the Placement process(Apptitude,Phychometric,GD).
ggest an appropriate stastical test and frame Null and Alternate Hypothesis (Use data given in Column E & F only rest all is raw data which is
dant) for thses three variables
hat are the measurement scales required by SPSS to run this analysis
hat would be the concern area for the placement committee when it comes to holding training session ((Apptitude/Phychometric/GD).
hy is ANOVA is considered a minnomer in testing of Hypothesis?
Income Household Amount
($1000s) Size Charged ($) Case: Consumer Research, INC.
66 4 4,764 Consumer research INC. is an independent agency that conducts research on consumer a
and behaviors for a variety of firms. In one study, a client asked for an investigation of co
51 3 4,110 characteristics that can be used to predict the amount charged by credit card users. Data
25 3 4,208 collected on annual income, household size and annual credit card charges for a sample
48 4 4,219 consumers.
27 1 2,477
Managerial Report:
33 2 2,514 6.1Develop the estimated regression equation. Which variable is a better predictor of a
65 3 4,214 credit card charges? Discuss your findings.
63 4 4,965 6.2What is the predicted annual credit card charge for a 3 person house hold and with
income of $40000?
42 6 4,412 6.3 State the assumptions of Regression Analysis
21 2 2,448
54 3 4,016
30 2 3,159
32 4 5,100
50 5 4,742
31 2 1,864
55 2 4,070
37 1 2,731
40 2 3,348
66 4 4,764
51 3 4,110
25 3 4,208
48 4 4,219
27 1 2,477
33 2 2,514
65 3 4,214
63 4 4,965
42 6 4,412
21 2 2,448
44 1 2,995
37 5 4,171
62 6 5,678
21 3 3,623
55 7 5,301
42 2 3,020
41 7 4,828
54 6 5,573
30 1 2,583
48 2 3,866
34 5 3,586
67 4 5,037
50 2 3,605
67 5 5,345
55 6 5,370
52 2 3,890
62 3 4,705
64 2 4,157
22 3 3,579
29 4 3,890
39 2 2,972
35 1 3,121
39 4 4,183
54 3 3,730
23 6 4,127
27 2 2,921
26 7 4,603
61 2 4,273
30 2 3,067
22 4 3,074
46 5 4,820
66 4 5,149
66 4 4,764
51 3 4,110
25 3 4,208
48 4 4,219
27 1 2,477
33 2 2,514
65 3 4,214
63 4 4,965
42 6 4,412
21 2 2,448
54 3 4,016
30 2 3,159
32 4 5,100
50 5 4,742
31 2 1,864
55 2 4,070
37 1 2,731
40 2 3,348
66 4 4,764
51 3 4,110
ucts research on consumer attitudes
ked for an investigation of consumer
ed by credit card users. Data were
it card charges for a sample of 80
$ScreeningCriteria Frequencies
Responses Percent of Cases
N Percent
$ScreeningCriteria
a Group Discussions 41 19.20% 36.00%
Extempore 48 22.50% 42.10%
Resume based Inter 19 8.90% 16.70%
Psychometric Asses 30 14.10% 26.30%
Group Interview 45 21.10% 39.50%
Technical Interview 5 2.30% 4.40%
Business case / Indus 10 4.70% 8.80%
Aptitude Test 15 7.00% 13.20%
Total 213 100.00% 186.80%
Interpretation:
From the Screening criteria frequencies table we can see that out of the total 114
respondants, 36% think that Group Discussions are redundant, 42.1% think that
extempore is redundant, 16.7% think that resume based interview is redundant,
26.3% think that psychometric tests are redundant, 39.5% think that group
interviews are redundant, 4.4% think that technical interviews are redundant,
8.8% think that Business cases are redundant and 13.2% people think that
aptitude tests are redundant.
Implications:
B schools, that make multiple rounds of screening processes before choosing a
candidate, must try and reduce their redundant processes to ensure that the best
method is used for choosing the most suitable candidate. Here, we can see that
most of the respondants feel that Extempore is a redundant process, and so, B
schools must try and avoid the process or replace it with some other process
which will not be considered as redundant. Similarly, Group Interviews are also
perceived to be redundant by many respondants and so, B schools must avoid
conducting them , unless necessary.
spss.
before choosing a
ensure that the best
e, we can see that
rocess, and so, B
e other process
terviews are also
ools must avoid
Parameter Rating
1 5
1 4 Group 1: Technical Interview
1 8 Group 2: Resume based Interview
1 6
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 8
1 5
1 3 Group Statistics
1 7 Parameter N Mean
Rating Technical 114 4.9737
1 3 Interview
Resume 114 4.1754
based
1 2 Interview
1 7
1 7
1 Levene's
6
Test for
1 4 Equality of Indepe
1 7 Variances
1 6 F Sig.
1 7
Rating Equal 4.364 0.038
variances
1 5 assumed
Equal
variances
1 4 not assumed
1 8
1 5
1 3
1 3 Answer 3.1:
1 2 Hypothesis:
H0: The average rating given by students to the given two para
1 3 H1: The average rating given by students to the given two para
1 2
1 3 Answer 3.2
1 7 Inference:
We can see that from the Independent Samples test table , the
1 4 required value of 5% as a result of which we accept the alterna
1 6 average rating given by the students to the two parameters diff
1 3
1 3 Answer 3.3
Final decision:
1 8 The college should focus more on providing training for technic
1 5 table that the mean for Technical based intervies is higher than
1 8 of technical based interviews are more.
1 3
1 8
1 3
1 6
1 4
1 6
1 4
1 5
1 5
1 7
1 4
1 8
1 8
1 4
1 3
1 3
1 4
1 7
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 5
1 3
1 8
1 6
1 4
1 4
1 6
1 6
1 6
1 6
1 6
1 6
1 8
1 5
1 3
1 5
1 8
1 1
1 7
1 8
1 6
1 3
1 7
1 7
1 5
1 8
1 3
1 8
1 4
1 3
1 8
1 2
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 7
1 7
1 6
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 6
1 2
1 2
1 8
1 8
1 1
1 6
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 6
1 2
1 3
1 7
2 8
2 7
2 5
2 3
2 4
2 3
2 3
2 6
2 4
2 7
2 4
2 1
2 1
2 3
2 3
2 7
2 3
2 8
2 5
2 4
2 8
2 2
2 5
2 7
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 6
2 3
2 4
2 8
2 1
2 4
2 2
2 6
2 7
2 6
2 4
2 1
2 5
2 5
2 2
2 5
2 5
2 5
2 2
2 7
2 2
2 3
2 7
2 6
2 3
2 6
2 4
2 3
2 6
2 4
2 1
2 1
2 7
2 1
2 1
2 3
2 3
2 1
2 7
2 6
2 4
2 8
2 5
2 8
2 1
2 3
2 5
2 3
2 7
2 5
2 2
2 7
2 5
2 1
2 8
2 2
2 7
2 5
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 5
2 5
2 7
2 8
2 7
2 2
2 8
2 6
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 7
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 5
2 5
2 1
2 2
2 1
2 3
2 7
2 7
2 8
2 6
Steps:
1) Group the data as mentioned,
2) Paste it one below another.
tatistics 3) copy the data to Spss and paste it.
4) Asign values to parameters, 1 being technical Interview and 2 bein
Std. Std. Error 5) Select independant sample T test.
Deviation Mean
6) select rating as test variables.
2.05440 0.19241 7) Parameter as grouping variables and define the grouping variable
8) After clicking ok you should get the output
2.37332 0.22228
t-test for
EqualityIndependent
of Samples Test
Means
Sig. (2- Mean
t df tailed) Difference
Std. Error
95%Difference
Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
2.715 226 0.007 0.79825 0.29399 0.21893 1.37756
nt Samples test table , the p vale of significance is .007 which is much lesser than the
hich we accept the alternate (research) hypothesis and thus, we can infer that the
to the two parameters differs significantly.
oviding training for technical based interview as we can see from the group statistics
ed intervies is higher than resume based interviews which means that the challenges
re.
.
ng technical Interview and 2 being resume based
.
2 1 Value df
Pearson 8.555a 3
3 1 Chi-Square
Likelihood 10.678 3
3 1 Ratio
Linear-by- 6.405 1
Linear
3 1 Association
N of Valid 114
2 1 Cases
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The m
expected count is .21.
3 1
2 1
3 1
3 1
2 1
3 1
2 1
3 1
3 1
3 0
2 0
2 1
2 1
3 0
2 1
3 1
3 1
3 0
1 1
3 0
1 1
3 1
2 1
3 1
3 1
3 1
4 1
3 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
3 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 1
2 1
2 0
3 1
1 1
3 1
4 1
3 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
3 1
2 1
2 1
3 1
3 1
3 0
2 1
3 1
3 1
2 1
2 1
3 1
3 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
3 0
1 1
1 1
3 0
1 1
2 1
3 1
3 1
3 1
1 1
Steps:
1) Code the data as mentioned in the question
2) copy in the SPSS.
3) Name the heading and assign values to the param
4) select the scale as nominal
5) select Descriptive statistics and cross tabs
6) Select feedback in columns and experience in row
Case Processing Summary 7) you should get the output.
Cases
Total
N Percent
0 0.0% 114 100.0%
4.4 the test of hypothesis which I would recommebd for the dat
Chi Square analysis. (As we need to find the relationship betwe
hi-Square Tests variables so for this type of data we use chi square )
4.5
Asymptotic Significance (2- Yes, college should think about holding such training process as
sided) that among the 114 students who filled the responses there are
0.036 total studenets who feel the need of such campus placement tr
0.014
0.011
ng such training process as its quite evident from the data itself
led the responses there are 102 students ie approximately 90% of
such campus placement training process.
Type of tesResponse
1 2
1 3 Descriptives
1 2 rating
1 1 (I) typeoftest
1 2
Aptitude Psychometri
1 3 c Test
Group
1 2 Discussion]
Psychometri Aptitude
1 2 c Test
Group
1 2 Discussion]
Group Aptitude
1 2 Discussion]
Psychometri
1 2 c Test
*. The mean difference
1 4
1 3
1 4
1 4
1 2
1 3
1 3
1 4
1 3
1 2
1 3
1 1
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 3
1 4
1 2
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 3
1 2
1 4
1 4
1 3
1 2
1 3
1 5
1 3
1 4
1 3
1 2
1 1
1 3
1 1
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 1
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 5
1 1
1 3
1 3
1 5
1 3
1 1
1 5
1 1
1 1
1 2
1 4
1 3
1 2
1 3
1 2
1 3
1 3
1 4
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 4
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 3
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 1
2 3
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 2
2 4
2 1
2 3
2 2
2 1
2 4
2 3
2 4
2 3
2 1
2 5
2 2
2 4
2 3
2 1
2 3
2 3
2 4
2 4
2 3
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 2
2 2
2 4
2 3
2 3
2 2
2 3
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 2
2 4
2 1
2 4
2 2
2 2
2 4
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 4
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 1
2 3
2 3
2 2
2 2
2 3
2 5
2 2
2 4
2 4
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 3
2 4
2 4
2 4
2 1
2 4
2 4
2 2
2 1
2 5
2 2
3 3
3 5
3 3
3 3
3 4
3 3
3 5
3 3
3 5
3 3
3 4
3 5
3 4
3 4
3 5
3 3
3 4
3 3
3 4
3 3
3 3
3 1
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 4
3 3
3 5
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 2
3 3
3 4
3 5
3 4
3 3
3 3
3 2
3 2
3 4
3 5
3 2
3 3
3 5
3 2
3 4
3 5
3 5
3 2
3 3
3 4
3 4
3 3
3 5
3 2
3 4
3 2
3 3
3 4
3 3
3 3
3 4
3 2
3 2
3 2
3 5
3 3
3 3
3 4
3 4
3 1
3 4
3 4
3 4
3 3
3 5
3 5
3 4
3 4
3 4
3 4
3 3
3 5
3 4
3 3
3 5
3 4
3 3
3 5
3 5
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 5
3 2
3 2
3 3
3 4
3 2
3 2
3 4
3 5
3 5
3 4
3 5
3 5
3 1
3 3
3 3
3 4
1)
Descriptives The appropriate statistical
variables.
H0:The average difficulty le
95% H1:The average difficulty le
Confidence
Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
As we can see from the ou
null hypothesis and select
Lower Upper H0(a):The average difficult
Bound Bound H1(a):The average difficult
2.5421 2.8965 1.00 5.00 As we can see that the p va
2.2805 2.6668 1.00 5.00 the null hypothesis i.e The
Mean
H1(c):The average difficulty
df Square F Sig. As we can see from the ou
2 33.345 32.304 0.000
the null hypothesis and go
is not same.
339 1.032
2)
The easurement scale requ
341
3)
The concern area for the p
been marked as a relatively
Post Hoc Tests of 1.04962 so it would be
Multiple Comparisons
rating 4)
In ANOVA we usevarianc
Mean 95%
analyzing means, not var
Difference Confidence have variances as the pri
(I-J) Std. Error Interval
Lower Upper
Sig. Bound Bound
0.24561 0.13457 0.163 -0.0712 0.5624
As we can see from the output table the p value is 0.000 which is less than the alpha value of 0.05 so we can safely reject the
null hypothesis and select the alternate hypothesis.
H0(a):The average difficulty level of aptitude and psychometric test is same.
H1(a):The average difficulty level of aptitude and psychometric test is not same.
As we can see that the p value is 0.163 which is more than the alpha value of 0.05 so we have a very high probability to accept
the null hypothesis i.e The average difficulty level of aptitude and psychometric test is same.
H1(c):The average difficulty level of psychometric and Group discussion is not same.
As we can see from the output table the p value is 0.000 which is less than the alpha value of 0.05 or 5% so we can safely reject
the null hypothesis and go ahead with alternate hypothesis i.e The average difficulty level of psychometric and Group discussion
is not same.
2)
The easurement scale required is nominal for type of test and scaled for response.
3)
The concern area for the placement committee when it comes to holding training session would be for Group Discussion as it has
been marked as a relatively diffcult area by students with the higest mean of 3.5088 also it has the highest standard deviation
of 1.04962 so it would be of a concern because there will be a lot of variation/dispersion in responses by students.
4)
In ANOVA we usevariance-like quantities to study the equality or non-equality of population means.So we are
analyzing means, not variances. There are some unrelated methods,such as “variance component analysis” which
have variances as the primary focusfor inference.
Steps
1) Copy paste data in SPSS and give label names
2) Go to analyze and select compare means and then one way
anova.
3) Put ratings in dependent variable and type of test in factor
4) Click on post hoc and select turkey and click on okay
5) we should get the output.
2) Go to analyze and select compare means and then one way
anova.
3) Put ratings in dependent variable and type of test in factor
4) Click on post hoc and select turkey and click on okay
5) we should get the output.
ons between three
means.So we are
onent analysis” which
A5
Question 1 What is your name, age, and past experience?
Areas where you believe placement cell can improve your overall personality ( can select multiple
Question 2
Option Communication and soft skills
Interview skills
Technical Skills
Resume building
Operations
Analytics
9LPA-12.5LPA
12.5LPA-15LPA
Above 15LPA
Would you like to be part of special seminars conducted over and above the scheduled lectures f
Question 5 placement training
Options Yes
No
Maybe- If time permits
Question 6 the type of summer internship that you would prefer during COVID 19 ?
Options Online
Offline
Question 7 Would you like placement cell to bring in more live projects ?
Options Yes
No
options 6lpa-8lpa
9lpa-12lpa
12lpa-15lpa
15lpa-20lpa
20lpa+
rsonality ( can select multiple )
uring COVID 19 ?
ve projects ?
cement?