Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based On Stiffness and Economy

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/317300481
Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based on

Stiffness and Economy
Article · June 2017
CITATION READS
1 1,283
5 authors, including:
Nagashree Balasubramanya
M.S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology
10 PUBLICATIONS 10 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Studies on Geopolymerisation Reaction using Synthesised Activators View project
ANALYSIS OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON MULTISTOREY R.C. STRUCTURE View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Nagashree Balasubramanya on 02 June 2017.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 5, Issue 03, 2017 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613
Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based

on Stiffness and Economy
Nagashree B1 Sachin Hokrane2 Soumajit Saha3
1
Assistant Professor 2,3U.G Student
1,2,3
Department of Civil Engineering
1 2,3
MSRIT, Bangalore MS Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Autonomous institute, affiliated to VTU,
Bangalore, Karnataka
Abstract— Bubble Deck is a revolutionary method of
virtually eliminating concrete from neutral axis of
conventional slab, which does not perform any structural
function, thereby dramatically reducing structural dead
weight by linking air and steel directly. Bubble Deck slab
uses hollow spherical or elliptical balls made by recycled
plastic. A Bubble Deck slab has a two-dimensional
arrangement of voids within the slabs to reduce self-weight.
Key feature of the project is to carry out the design each slab
and compare them in terms of which includes stiffness and
economy. We will compare these characteristics for better Fig. 1: BUBBLE DECK SLAB
selection of the roof system suitable for proposing for
particular project. Through this project we will be able to II. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION
achieve adequacy on certain parameters like stiffness and
economy. The materials which are used for the experimental procedure
Key words: Stiffness and Economy, Conventional Slab are as follows;
A. Cement
I. INTRODUCTION Cement is the most important binding ingredient which
Bubble Deck is a biaxial technology that increases span determines the fresh & hardened properties of concrete.
lengths and makes floors thinner by reducing the weight Ordinary Portland cement of 43 grade (sp gravity-3.5)
while maintaining the performance of reinforced confirming to IS 12269-1987 is used in this experimental
concrete slabs A construction method by eliminating program.
concrete from the neutral axis of a floor slab that is
structurally not performing, as a result dramatically reducing B. Fine aggregate
in dead weight. Hollow biaxial slabs, also known as biaxial The aggregates which are passing through 4.75mm size IS
voided slabs, are reinforced concrete slabs in which voids sieve and contains only that much of coarse grained
allow to reduce the amount (volume) of concrete. The main materials are permitted by the specifications are generalized
disadvantage of concrete constructions, in case of horizontal as fine aggregates. Fine aggregates confirming to zone II
slabs, is the high weight which limits the span. For this passing through 4.75mm IS sieve (sp gravity - 2.52) is used
reason, basic research in the field of reinforced concrete in this experimental programe.
structures have focused on enhancing the span, either by
reducing the weight or overcoming concrete's natural C. Coarse aggregate
weakness in tension. Due to the prefabrication, these are The aggregates which are retained on 4.75mm size IS sieve
inexpensive, and reduce building time, but can be used only and contains only finer materials are generalized as coarse
in one-way spanning constructions, and must be supported aggregates. Coarse aggregate passing through 12mm sieve
by beams and/or fixed walls. The slab has been especially and retained on 10mm sieve (sp gravity - 2.63) are used in
popular in countries where the emphasis of home this experimental programme.
construction has been on precast concrete, including
D. Steel
Northern Europe and socialist countries of Eastern Europe.
Precast concrete popularity is linked with low-seismic zones The steel is fabricated in two form- meshed layers for lateral
and more economical constructions because of fast building support and diagonal girders for vertical support of the balls.
assembly, lower self-weight (less material), etc. E. Plastic spheres
The plastic spheres are the hollow balls which are made of
plastic materials.
III. METHODOLOGY
Basic tests on cement, coarse aggregate and fine aggregate
were conducted. Using the results of basic tests, mix design
for M20 grade of concrete and Fe415 grade of steel for a slab
of 1m x1 m was made using IS 10262-2009.Then the design
All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 1396

Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based on Stiffness and Economy
(IJSRD/Vol. 5/Issue 03/2017/356)
for conventional slab was made using IS 456-2000.In order

to determine fresh properties of concrete slump test and
hardened properties of concrete, Cube Compression, Split
tensile and flexural test on prisms was conducted. Further
the conventional slab and bubble deck slab (1mX1m) with
balls of different diameter of 70mm and 60mm was casted.
Test was conducted for the casted slab for curing periods of
7 days and 14 days. The graph for load versus deflection
was obtained. The ultimate load of the conventional slab and
bubble deck slabs were recorded from the graphs. The Fig. 6: Cracks developed in the slabs after failure
deflections at ultimate slabs were also recorded. The
stiffness of the slabs were calculated from the graph.
Stiffness = (Load/Deflection)
Amount of concrete used for the casting of all the
three slabs was calculated using the methods of estimation
and costing. Comparison of volume of concrete used for
bubble deck slab and conventional slab.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS
Fig. 7: Stiffness curves for conventional slab
Fig. 2: Finishing of conventional slab
Fig. 8: Stiffness curves bubble deck slab (70mm dia)
Fig. 3: Casting of Bubble deck slab of 70mm void size
Fig. 9: Stiffness curves bubble deck slab (60mm dia)

Type of slabs Stiffness (KN/mm2)
conventional 17.30
Bubble deck 70mm void 13.18
Fig. 4: Casting of Bubble deck slab of 60mm void size Bubble deck 60mm void 21.42
Table 1:
Fig. 5: Arrangment of loading

Fig. 10: Bar graphs for comparison of stiffness for ultimate
loads of the three slabs

Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based on Stiffness and Economy
(IJSRD/Vol. 5/Issue 03/2017/356)
Percentage
Total amount
Sl reduction in
Type of slab (concrete and
no cost of
reinforcement)
concrete
Conventional
1 10910 -
slab
Bubble deck
2 9969 9.41%
slab (70mm dia)
Bubble deck
3 9500 14.10%
slab (60mm dia)
Table 2: Cost estimation of for conventional and bubble
deck slabs
V. CONCLUSIONS
 The stiffness of bubble deck slab with smaller dia balls
(60mm) was found to be greater than that of 70mm dia
balls slab and conventional slab.
 About 14% of money can be saved by using bubble
deck slab of 60mm diameter and 9.41% by 70mm
diameter.
 The volume of concrete for60mm balls was found to be
more economical.
 This concludes that the bubble deck slab of 60mm
diameter is more effective in terms of strength, stiffness
and economy compared to conventional slab.
REFERENCES
[1] IS 456 – 2000 (For slab design)
[2] IS 10262-2009 (For mix design)
[3] "Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute".Structures: The
Sum of their parts. 2008.15April 2010 s
[4] "DR.B.C.Punmia,A.K.Jain",Soil Mechanics &
Foundations,16th Edition 2005
[5] "Ashok Kumar Jain",Reinforced Concrete,6th
Edition,2002.
[6] "Bubble deck design and detailing,BubbleDeck Voided
Flat Slab Solutions- Technical Manual and Documents
(2007).
[7] "BubbleDeck Slab properties " Bubble Deck Voided
Flat Slab Solutions- Technical Manual and Documents
(2006).
[8] " BubbleDeck-UK". "Lighter Flat Slab Structures with
Bubble Deck." (2006).
View publication stats

Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based On Stiffness and Economy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based On Stiffness and Economy

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based On Stiffness and Economy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based on

Article · June 2017

Studies on Geopolymerisation Reaction using Synthesised Activators View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Comparative Studies of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 1396

for conventional slab was made using IS 456-2000.In order

IV. EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS

Fig. 7: Stiffness curves for conventional slab

Fig. 2: Finishing of conventional slab

Fig. 8: Stiffness curves bubble deck slab (70mm dia)

Fig. 3: Casting of Bubble deck slab of 70mm void size

Fig. 9: Stiffness curves bubble deck slab (60mm dia)

Fig. 5: Arrangment of loading

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 1397

All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 1398

View publication stats

You might also like