Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 48 views

    PR2 Data Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Angelica Taculao
    This chapter analyzes data from a survey of senior high school students on the impact of digital teaching and learning. Several tables are presented: 1) Respondent demographics including academic section, strand/course, device used, modality preference, and time spent online. The majority used phones for 4-6 hours and preferred synchronous learning. 2) A 20-item survey on the impact of digital learning, which most respondents remained neutral on overall based on average ratings for each item. 3) Verbal interpretations are provided to classify average ratings as disagree, neutral, or agree. The overall weighted average of 3.07 indicates respondents remained neutral on the impact of digital learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    PR2 Data Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Angelica Taculao
    48 views4 pages
    This chapter analyzes data from a survey of senior high school students on the impact of digital teaching and learning. Several tables are presented: 1) Respondent demographics including academic section, strand/course, device used, modality preference, and time spent online. The majority used phones for 4-6 hours and preferred synchronous learning. 2) A 20-item survey on the impact of digital learning, which most respondents remained neutral on overall based on average ratings for each item. 3) Verbal interpretations are provided to classify average ratings as disagree, neutral, or agree. The overall weighted average of 3.07 indicates respondents remained neutral on the impact of digital learning.

    Original Description:

    Thesis

    Original Title

    PR2 data analysis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This chapter analyzes data from a survey of senior high school students on the impact of digital teaching and learning. Several tables are presented: 1) Respondent demographics including academic section, strand/course, device used, modality preference, and time spent online. The majority used phones for 4-6 hours and preferred synchronous learning. 2) A 20-item survey on the impact of digital learning, which most respondents remained neutral on overall based on average ratings for each item. 3) Verbal interpretations are provided to classify average ratings as disagree, neutral, or agree. The overall weighted average of 3.07 indicates respondents remained neutral on the impact of digital learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    48 views4 pages

    PR2 Data Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Angelica Taculao
    This chapter analyzes data from a survey of senior high school students on the impact of digital teaching and learning. Several tables are presented: 1) Respondent demographics including academic section, strand/course, device used, modality preference, and time spent online. The majority used phones for 4-6 hours and preferred synchronous learning. 2) A 20-item survey on the impact of digital learning, which most respondents remained neutral on overall based on average ratings for each item. 3) Verbal interpretations are provided to classify average ratings as disagree, neutral, or agree. The overall weighted average of 3.07 indicates respondents remained neutral on the impact of digital learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Chapter 4

    Data analysis

    This chapter present the analysis and interprets the data gathered in order to draw out important
    information and significant points about The impact of digital teaching and learning in senior highschool
    students in holy Nazarene Christian School. For clarity and consistency in the discussion, the data are
    presented by likert scale and Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis.

    Table. 1 Sections
    Section Frequency Percentage
    Genesis 10 11.1%
    Kings 24 26.7%
    Leviticus 4 4.4%
    Judges 0 0%
    Numbers 10 11.1%
    Psalms 0 0%
    Proverbs 5 5.6%
    Chronicles 0 0%
    Romans 7 7.8%
    Colossians 0 0%
    Hebrews 1 11.1%
    Galatians 2 2.2%
    Corinthians 6 6.7%
    Thessalonians 0 0%
    Ephesians 21 23.3%
    Philippians 0 0%
    Total 90 100%

    The table 1 show the sections of the Respondents. 11.1% of the Respondents are Genesis in section.
    26.7% of the Respondents are kings in sections. 4.4% of the Respondents are Leviticus in sections. 11.1%
    of the Respondents are Numbers in sections. 5.6% of the Respondents are Proverbs in sections. 7.8% of
    the Respondents are Romans in sections. Same percent of the Respondents on Genesis are Hebrews in
    sections. 2.2% of the Respondents are Galatians in sections. 6.7% of the Respondents are Corinthians in
    sections. 23.3% of the Respondents are Ephesians in sections. Non Respondents in sections are judges,
    Psalms, Chronicles, Colossians, Thessalonians, and Philippians, the are 16 sections on senior high school.
    The sections that has a lot Respondents are kings.

    Table 2. Strand

    Strand Frequency Percentage

    STEM 44 50%
    HUMSS 26 29.5%

    ABM 18 20.5%

    ICT 0 0%

    Total 88 100%

    The table 2 shows the strand of Respondents out of 88 Respondents there are 44 senior high school that
    are STEM which is 50%. 26 senior high school Respondents that are HUMSS which is 29.5%.18 SHS
    Respondents that are ABM which is 20.5% senior high school.

    Table. 3 Using devices


    Devices Frequencies Percentage
    Phone 47 51.6%
    Tablet 2 2.2%
    Laptop 29 31.9%
    Computer 13 14.3%
    Total 91 100%

    Table 3 shows the devices that they used of our Respondents 47 Respondents are using phone which is
    51.6%. In conclusion the respondent are average using devices is phone.

    Table. 4 Modality

    Modality Frequency Percentage

    Synchronous 76 84.4%

    Asynchronous 14 15.6%

    Total 90 100%

    Table 4 shows the modality they choose of Respondents which is 84.4% is the synchronous and 15.6%
    Asynchronous they choose in modality.

    Table. 5 Time

    Time Frequency Percentage


    1-3hours 8 8.8%
    3-4hours 29 31.9%
    4-6hiurs 42 46.2%
    7 hours 12 13.2%
    above
    Total 91 100%

    Table 5 shows the time they spend of Respondents 8 Respondents are 1-3hours which is 8.8%. In
    conclusion the respondent are average time is 4-6 hours.

    Table. 6 Impact of digital learning

    Question Main Verbal


    Average Interpretation
    Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
    disagree (2) (3) (4) agree
    (1) (5)
    1 2 17 50 19 3 3.0 Neutral
    2 2 13 53 21 2 3.1 Neutral
    3 3 16 51 21 0 2.10 Disagree
    4 1 8 39 30 12 3.5 Neutral
    5 2 1 27 25 36 4.0 Agree
    6 14 21 47 9 0 2.6 Disagree
    7 4 12 34 26 15 3.4 Neutral
    8 2 5 37 25 22 3.7 Neutral
    9 6 15 49 15 6 3 Neutral
    10 13 19 52 7 0 2.6 Disagree
    11 16 19 32 17 7 2.8 Disagree
    12 7 8 45 25 6 3.2 Neutral
    13 7 10 49 20 5 3.1 Neutral
    14 1 4 33 41 12 3.6 Neutral
    15 5 10 47 15 14 2.6 Disagree
    16 11 8 51 19 2 2.9 Disagree
    17 9 18 46 15 3 2.8 Disagree
    18 0 12 36 24 18 3.5 Neutral
    19 4 3 57 22 5 3.2 Neutral
    20 15 14 45 13 3 2.7 Disagree
    Weighted 3.07 Neutral
    Average

    Verbal
    Interpretation
    Disagree 1.00-1.50
    Disagree 1.51-2.50

    Neutral 2.51-3.50

    Agree 3.51-4.50

    Strongly agree 4.51-5.00

    Table 6 shows the Impact of digital learning of the senior high school or the Respondents for the
    question number 1 the average that I’ve got is 3.0 which is Neutral. In conclusion the Weighted Average
    is 3.07 which is Neutral.

    You might also like