Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 34 views

    Critical Thinking Word Tables

    Uploaded by

    Jonathan Roque
    The document contains 12 tables that provide data on respondents' demographics and self-assessment abilities. Table 1 shows most respondents were 3rd year students. Tables 2-5 outline respondents' block, gender, ethnicity and province of residency. Tables 6-11 contain the frequency and mean scores for respondents' abilities in remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and an additional cognitive process. Most mean scores fell in the 3.41-4.20 range or "4" on the suggested rating scale, indicating respondents could synthesize feedback and self-assess with assistance. Table 12 shows over 40% of respondents could self-assess using feedback, while around 35% could fully utilize self-assessment and feedback.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Critical Thinking Word Tables

    Uploaded by

    Jonathan Roque
    34 views10 pages
    The document contains 12 tables that provide data on respondents' demographics and self-assessment abilities. Table 1 shows most respondents were 3rd year students. Tables 2-5 outline respondents' block, gender, ethnicity and province of residency. Tables 6-11 contain the frequency and mean scores for respondents' abilities in remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and an additional cognitive process. Most mean scores fell in the 3.41-4.20 range or "4" on the suggested rating scale, indicating respondents could synthesize feedback and self-assess with assistance. Table 12 shows over 40% of respondents could self-assess using feedback, while around 35% could fully utilize self-assessment and feedback.

    Original Title

    critical thinking word tables

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains 12 tables that provide data on respondents' demographics and self-assessment abilities. Table 1 shows most respondents were 3rd year students. Tables 2-5 outline respondents' block, gender, ethnicity and province of residency. Tables 6-11 contain the frequency and mean scores for respondents' abilities in remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and an additional cognitive process. Most mean scores fell in the 3.41-4.20 range or "4" on the suggested rating scale, indicating respondents could synthesize feedback and self-assess with assistance. Table 12 shows over 40% of respondents could self-assess using feedback, while around 35% could fully utilize self-assessment and feedback.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    34 views10 pages

    Critical Thinking Word Tables

    Uploaded by

    Jonathan Roque
    The document contains 12 tables that provide data on respondents' demographics and self-assessment abilities. Table 1 shows most respondents were 3rd year students. Tables 2-5 outline respondents' block, gender, ethnicity and province of residency. Tables 6-11 contain the frequency and mean scores for respondents' abilities in remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and an additional cognitive process. Most mean scores fell in the 3.41-4.20 range or "4" on the suggested rating scale, indicating respondents could synthesize feedback and self-assess with assistance. Table 12 shows over 40% of respondents could self-assess using feedback, while around 35% could fully utilize self-assessment and feedback.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 10

    Table 1.

    Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Year Level

    Year Level Frequency Percentage


    Gender Frequency Percentage
    1st year 107 36.39%
    S-Male
    2nd year 9237 31.29% 12.59
    S-Female
    3rd year 95232 32.31% 78.91
    Gay4th year 02 0.68
    LesbianTotal n=294 1 100% 0.34
    Queer 6 2.04
    Bisexual 15 5.10
    Transgender 1 0.34
    Total n=294 100

    Table 2. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Block

    Block Frequency Percentage


    Elgen A 66 22.45%
    Elgen B 76 25.85%
    Elgen C 72 24.49%
    Elgen D 80 27.21%
    Total n=294 100%
    Table 3. Frequency and
    Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Gender
    Table 4. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Ethnicity

    Ethnicity Frequency Percentage


    Ilonggo 54 18.37%
    Tagalog 3 1.02%
    Ilocano 13 4.42%
    Cebuano 115 39.12%
    B'laan 27 9.18%
    T'boli 11 3.74%
    Maguindanaon 46 15.65%
    Maranao 11 3.74%
    Tausog 5 1.70%
    Tagakaulo 6 2.04%
    Boholano 1 0.34%
    Bagobo 1 0.34%
    Manobo 1 0.34%
    Total n=294 100%
    Table 5. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Province of Residency

    Province Frequency Percentage


    General Santos City 129 43.88%
    South Cotabato 88 29.93%
    Sultan Kudarat 20 6.80%
    Sarangani 46 15.65%
    Maguindanao 5 1.70%
    Jose Abad Santos 1 0.34%
    Davao del Sur 2 0.68%
    Lanao del Sur 1 0.34%
    North Cotabato 1 0.34%
    Davao Occidental 1 0.34%
    Total n=294 100%
    Table 6. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Remembering

    Frequenc
    Indicators Indicators y MeanFrequency Mean
    InterpretationInterpretation
    a. Explains ideas, concepts, and
    a. Recalls content and details. 971 3.30
    principles 1117 3.80
    b. Identifies classification, principles,
    b. Contextualizes ideas, concepts and
    methodologies, and theories. 957 3.26
    principles 1095 3.72
    c. Demonstrates awareness. 1142 3.88
    c. Restates main ideas, concepts and principles. 1091 3.71
    d. Anticipates consequences 1083 3.68
    Grand Mean 3.77
    Grand Mean 3.42

    Table 7. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Understanding


    Table 8. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Applying

    Indicators
    Indicators Frequency Mean
    Frequency Interpretation
    Mean Interpretation
    a.a.Draws conclusion.
    Applies knowledge. 1142 3.88
    1135 3.86
    b.b.Distinguishes information.
    Seeks alternative solutions. 1201 4.09
    1177 4.00
    c.c. Applies
    Breaksprocedures.
    down theories, 1131 3.85
    formulas, or arguments.
    Grand Mean 1068 3.63 3.90
    d. Demonstrates awareness. 1161 3.95
    Grand Mean 3.89

    Table 9. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Analyzing


    Table 10. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of Evaluating

    Indicators
    Indicators Frequency
    Total Mean
    Mean Interpretation
    Interpretation
    a.a.Draws
    Assessing reliability and
    generalizations. 1144 3.89
    b.comprehensive.
    Generates new ideas 1134
    1132 3.86
    3.85
    c.b.Integrates relevant
    Determines knowledge
    effectiveness 1118 3.80
    Grand Mean 3.85
    and appropriateness. 1109 3.77
    c. Demonstrates ability to
    assess. 1118 3.80
    Grand Mean 3.81

    Table 11. Frequency and Mean distribution of the respondents in terms of ……?
    Table 12. Frequency and Percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of Self-Assessment

    Rating Description Frequency Percentage


    1 Not Applicable 0 0.00%
    2 Not Evident 3 1.02%
    Identify major weaknesses and
    3 strengths with assistance 60 20.41%
    I synthesize feedback form
    instruction and integrate with self-
    4 assessment 129 43.88%
    I utilize self-assessment and other
    5 feedback 102 34.69%
    Total 294 100%
    Suggestions ko ding for interpretation sa table 6 to 11..

    Rating Scale Range Description Interpretation


    1 1.00-1.80
    2 1.81-2.60
    3 2.61-3.40
    4 3.41-4.20
    5 4.21-5.00

    You might also like