Greenfield v. Meer, 77 Phil. 394
Greenfield v. Meer, 77 Phil. 394
Greenfield v. Meer, 77 Phil. 394
Student: Attorney, could you enlighten us about the nature of tax exemption?
Professor: An exemption from taxation is a grant of immunity, express or implied, to particular persons or
corporations or to persons or corporations of a particular class, from a tax upon property or an excise which
persons and corporations generally within the same taxing district are obliged to pay.
CAPTION BELOW: Tax exemption is a freedom from a charge or burden to which others are subject.
(Greenfield v. Meer, 77 Phil. 394)
Smart Communications Inc.: Under that legislative franchise, my payment of franchise tax shall be considered
in lieu of all taxes. Therefore, I should not be liable for any local franchise and business tax.
Supreme Court: Not anymore. R.A. No. 7294 does not expressly provide what kind of taxes you are exempted
from. It is not clear whether the “in lieu of all taxes” provision in your franchise would include exemption from
local or national taxation. The uncertainty in the “in lieu of all taxes” clause must be construed against Smart
which claims the exemption.
CAPTION BELOW: He who claims an exemption from his share of the common burden of taxation must justify
his claim by showing that the Legislature intended to exempt it by words too plain to be beyond doubt or
mistake. (City of Iloilo v. Smart Communications Inc., G.R. No. 167260, August 12, 1991)
MCIAA: Under RA 6058, I am exempted from payment of realty tax since I am a government-owned and
controlled corporation.
Office of the Treasurer of the City of Cebu: Not anymore. By virtue of the Local Government Code, your
exemption from payment of taxes is withdrawn. Your exemption may be withdrawn at the pleasure of the
taxing authority.
PERSON 1: I already paid a total of 200,000 for my income tax last year, however, when I computed again, I am
only liable for 150,000 income tax.
PERSON 2: You can get a refund of the amount of 50,000 you erroneously paid as payment for the unsettled
tax liabilities, even if barred by prescription, provided both taxes arise from the same transaction in which the
overpayment and underpayment is due.
CAPTION BELOW: However, the doctrine of equitable recoupment is not applicable in the Philippines. Taxes
are not subject to set-off or legal compensation. (Republic v. Mambulao Lumber Co., 6 SCRA 622)