Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 53 views

    College of Business and Management Item Analysis in The Contemporary World (Gec 3)

    Uploaded by

    Tommy Montero
    This document contains an item analysis of a midterm exam taken by 22 students in a business course. It analyzes 20 questions on the exam. For each question, it shows the number of students who answered correctly in the upper and lower groups, as well as calculations of the discrimination index (Df) and difficulty index (Ds). Based on these calculations, most questions were found to be very difficult with very discriminating power, and were rejected. Question 9 was the only one found to be very easy. The analysis was prepared by an instructor and verified by the program head to evaluate the quality of the exam questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    College of Business and Management Item Analysis in The Contemporary World (Gec 3)

    Uploaded by

    Tommy Montero
    53 views2 pages
    This document contains an item analysis of a midterm exam taken by 22 students in a business course. It analyzes 20 questions on the exam. For each question, it shows the number of students who answered correctly in the upper and lower groups, as well as calculations of the discrimination index (Df) and difficulty index (Ds). Based on these calculations, most questions were found to be very difficult with very discriminating power, and were rejected. Question 9 was the only one found to be very easy. The analysis was prepared by an instructor and verified by the program head to evaluate the quality of the exam questions.

    Original Description:

    2

    Original Title

    BSHM-MID

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an item analysis of a midterm exam taken by 22 students in a business course. It analyzes 20 questions on the exam. For each question, it shows the number of students who answered correctly in the upper and lower groups, as well as calculations of the discrimination index (Df) and difficulty index (Ds). Based on these calculations, most questions were found to be very difficult with very discriminating power, and were rejected. Question 9 was the only one found to be very easy. The analysis was prepared by an instructor and verified by the program head to evaluate the quality of the exam questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    53 views2 pages

    College of Business and Management Item Analysis in The Contemporary World (Gec 3)

    Uploaded by

    Tommy Montero
    This document contains an item analysis of a midterm exam taken by 22 students in a business course. It analyzes 20 questions on the exam. For each question, it shows the number of students who answered correctly in the upper and lower groups, as well as calculations of the discrimination index (Df) and difficulty index (Ds). Based on these calculations, most questions were found to be very difficult with very discriminating power, and were rejected. Question 9 was the only one found to be very easy. The analysis was prepared by an instructor and verified by the program head to evaluate the quality of the exam questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    UNIVERSITY OF ANTIQUE
    Tibiao, Antique

    COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT


    ITEM ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD (GEC 3)

    Midterm Finals Others______


    1ST Semester, A.Y. 2020 – 2021

    No. of students in No. of students in


    ITEM the Upper Group the Lower Group Item
    Df Interpretation Ds Interpretation Decision
    NUMBER Category
    (n=11) (n=11)
    1 9 2 0.00 Very Difficult 0.50 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    2 11 8 0.04 Very Difficult 0.21 Moderately Discriminating Poor Rejected
    3 11 4 0.04 Very Difficult 0.50 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    4 11 2 0.00 Very Difficult 0.64 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    5 9 5 0.00 Very Difficult 0.29 Moderately Discriminating Poor Rejected
    6 9 1 0.04 Very Difficult 0.57 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    7 9 4 0.00 Very Difficult 0.36 Discriminating Poor Rejected
    8 11 3 0.00 Very Difficult 0.57 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    9 11 6 0.61 Very Easy 0.36 Discriminating Poor Rejected
    10 11 1 0.00 Very Difficult 0.71 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    11 9 3 0.04 Very Difficult 0.43 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    12 10 6 0.00 Very Difficult 0.29 Moderately Discriminating Poor Rejected
    13 9 6 0.04 Very Difficult 0.21 Moderately Discriminating Poor Rejected

    VAA-FM-038 Rev.1/03-09-20
    14 10 2 0.04 Very Difficult 0.57 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    15 8 4 0.04 Very Difficult 0.29 Moderately Discriminating Poor Rejected
    16 9 5 0.04 Very Difficult 0.29 Moderately Discriminating Poor Rejected
    17 9 2 0.00 Very Difficult 0.50 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    18 11 4 0.00 Very Difficult 0.50 Very Discriminating Very Poor Rejected
    19 11 8 0.00 Very Difficult 0.21 Moderately Discriminating Poor Rejected
    20 8 3 0.00 Very Difficult 0.36 Discriminating Poor Rejected

    Prepared by: Checked &Verified by: Approved by:

    JULIE FE G. TANDOY JAMIE T. ESPAÑOLA JR., MM-HM LOVELLA C. FLORES, DBM-HM


    Instructor Program Head, BSHM Associate Dean

    VAA-FM-038 Rev.1/03-09-20

    You might also like