CAAD-What Do I Know
CAAD-What Do I Know
CAAD-What Do I Know
Why is it important to study how children grow, learn and change? This is what the
course elaborated and presented to me. Full understanding of this course allows me, as an
aspiring teacher to be knowledgeable of children which in the future I will teach. Also an
understanding of child development is essential because it allows us to fully appreciate
growth and development that children go through from birth and into adulthood. It is clear
that educating children goes way beyond letters and numbers. Whether I will be teaching
young ones, keeping them safe and busy in schools, or even raising one of my own in the
future, understanding childhood development can make a great impact on how I relate with
children.
The nature versus nurture debate, one of the oldest philosophical issues within
psychology is also presented. The concept seeks to understand how our personalities and
traits are produced by our genetic makeup and biological factors, and how they are shaped
by our environment, including our parents, peers, and culture. For instance, why do
biological children sometimes act like their parents? Is it because of genetic similarity, or the
result of the early childhood environment and what children learn from their parents? My
opinion is that both factors play a critical role in child development and special to each one
of us. And that nature and nurture interact in important ways all throughout our life. Next
presented were the contexts of child development. These are family, peers, culture and
community, ethnicity and race, social and socioeconomic status, and the society and policy.
The contexts of children’s development can be thought of as nested, interacting
ecosystems. Each context can provide resources for positive growth or present significant
challenges towards children’s health and well-being.
Though many scientists and researchers have approached the study of child
development over the last hundred or so years, only a few of the theories that have resulted
have stood the test of time and have proven to be widely influential. While these theorists
realize that every child is special and grow in his or her unique way, they also have
recognized that there are general patterns children tend to follow as they grow up, and they
have documented these patterns in their theories. First is Sigmund Freud's view, of which
each stage focused on sexual activity and the pleasure received from a particular area of the
body. In the oral phase, children are focused on the pleasures that they receive from
sucking and biting with their mouth. In the Anal phase, this focus shifts to the anus as they
begin toilet training and attempt to control their bowels. In the Phallic stage, the focus
moves to genital stimulation and the sexual identification that comes with having or not
having a penis. The Phallic/Oedipus stage was thought to be followed by a period of Latency
during which sexual urges and interest were temporarily nonexistent. Finally, children were
thought to enter and remain in a final Genital stage in which adult sexual interests and
activities come to dominate. Second theorist is Erik Erickson. Erickson saw the world as a
series of age-matched developmental crises, and he conceptualized these crises as binary
and competing values. He didn’t think of the crises as bad things, rather, each crisis
represented an opportunity to move forward. Infancy, for example, is characterized
by trust versus mistrust. Adolescence is a battle between identity formation versus role
diffusion. If these binary crises are not successfully negotiated, for instance an infant who
can’t trust the adults of the world to keep him warm and fed and held, then that infant will
grow up with a fundamental lack of trust, and at some point, will have to actively address
this issue. Next is Jean Piaget. Piaget's theory has four stages: sensorimotor, preoperational,
concrete operational, and formal operational. During the sensorimotor stage, which often
lasts from birth to age two, children are just beginning to learn how to learn. During the
preoperational stage, which often lasts from ages two though seven, children start to use
mental symbols to understand and to interact with the world, and they begin to learn
language and to engage in pretend play. In the concrete operational stage that follows,
lasting from ages seven through eleven, children gain the ability to think logically to solve
problems and to organize information they learn. However, they remain limited to
considering only concrete, not abstract, information because at this stage the capability for
abstract thought isn't well developed yet. Finally, during the formal operational stage, which
often lasts from age eleven on, adolescents learn how to think more abstractly to solve
problems and to think symbolically.