Assessment in Student Learning 1 A Modular Approach
Assessment in Student Learning 1 A Modular Approach
A Modular Approach
The course focuses on the development and utilization of assessment tools to improve the
teaching- learning process especially in education courses. It emphasis on the use of testing for measuring
knowledge, comprehension and other thinking skills. It allows the students to go through the standard steps
in test construction for quality competency assessment.
OUTLINE
Week Course Outcomes Topics
Week 1 At the end of the semester, the students must have: MinSCAT VMGO
(1 hour)
1. explained the VMGO and core values of the institution 1. VMGO
2. exemplified the VMGO and core values 2. Core Values
3. applied the core values 3. Academic policies
4. reflected on the value of institution’s academic 4. Course Syllabi
policies
internalized the VMGO, core values of the college as
well as the academic policies
Week 1 - 2 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter 1 – Shift of Educational Focus
Explained the three outstanding characteristics of from Content to Learning Outcomes
outcome-based education 1.1 Outcome-bases Education
Distinguished among institutional outcomes, program 1.2 The Outcomes of Education
outcomes, course outcomes and learning outcomes 1.3 Institutional, Program, Course
Distinguished between immediate outcomes and and Learning Outcomes
deferred outcomes 1.4 Educational Objectives and
Differentiated between educational objectives and Learning Outcomes
learning outcomes 1.5 Basic Concepts of Assessment
Week 3 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter 2 – Measurement, Assessment
Distinguished among measurement, assessment and and Evaluation in Outcome-Based
evaluation Education
Explained various approaches to assessment: 2.1 Measurement
assessment FOR, OF and AS learning 2.2 Assessment
2.3 Evaluation
2.4 Approaches to Assessment:
Assessment FOR, OF and AS Learning
Week 4 – 5 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter 3 – Program Outcomes
Clarified the program outcomes for teacher education 3.1 Program Outcomes and
Distinguished the six levels of knowledge under Student Learning Outcomes
the cognitive domain 3.2 Program Outcomes for
Discussed the psychomotor categories in the Teacher Education
psychomotor domain of objective 3.3 Domain 1: Cognitive
Discussed the six levels of learning objective in the 3.4 Domain 2: Psychomotor
affective domain 3.5 Domain 3: Affective
Discussed Kendall’s and Morgan’s new taxonomy 3.6 Kendall’s and Morgan’s
New Taxonomy
Weeks 6 - 7 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter 4 – Assessing Student
Clarified the principles in assessing learning Learning Outcomes
outcomes 4.1 Principles of Good
Explained the phase of outcomes assessment Practice in Assessing Learning
Determined the alignment of learning outcomes and Outcomes
assessment tasks 4.2 Phases of Outcome
Assessment in the Instructional Cycle
4.3 Variety of Assessment
1|[Educ222] Assessment of Student Learning 1
Methods, Tools and Tasks
Week 7 - 8 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter V – Development of Varied
Constructed a Table of Specification Assessment Tools
Constructed paper-and-pencil tests in accordance 5.1 Planning a Test and
with the guidelines in test construction Construction of TOS
5.2 Types of Paper-and-Pencil Test
5.3 Constructing Selected
Response Type
5.4 Constructing Supply Type
MIDTERM EXAMINATION - WEEK 9 (1 hour)
Weeks 10 – 12 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter 6 – Item Analysis and
Explained the meaning of item analysis, validity, Validation
reliability, difficulty index and discrimination index 6.1 Item Analysis
Determined the reliability and validity of the given test 6.2 Validity
items 6.3 Reliability
Determined the quality of the test item by its difficulty
index, discrimination index and plausibility of options
Week 13-15 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter 7 – Statistics in Assessment of
Explained the meaning and function of descriptive Learning
statistical tools in assessment of learning : measures 7.1 Measures of Central Tendency
of central tendency, measures of variability, 7.2 Measures of Variability
skewness and kurtosis 7.3 Skewness
Computed measures of central tendency, measures 7.4 Kurtosis
of variability, skewness and kurtosis
Week 16-17 At the end of the topic, the students must have: Chapter 8 – Grading Systems
Distinguished between norm-referenced grading and 8.1 Norm-referenced Grading
criterion-referenced grading; cumulative and 8.2 Criterion-referenced Grading
averaging grading system 8.3 Cumulative Grading
8.4 Averaging Grading
8.5 Policy Guidelines on Classroom
Assessment for K to 12 Basic Education
FINAL EXAMINATION - WEEK 9 (1 hour)
Unit 1. Basic Concept of Assessment
Course Outcomes
At the end of the topic, the students must have:
1. discuss the concepts of test, non-test, measurement, assessment and evaluation;
2. infer that an evaluation based on assessment is more comprehensive than evaluation based on
measurement; and
3. differentiate the types of assessment that can be applied for classroom evaluation
4. Distinguish among institutional outcomes, program outcomes, course outcomes and learning
outcomes
5. . Formulate learning outcomes based on given educational objectives.
Time Allotted: hrs
PRETEST
Directions: Read and analyze each item carefully. Choose the correct answer from the alternatives.
1. The following concepts are most important for the change of the term “measurement” and “evaluation”
EXCEPT:
a.Students must be given a chance to evaluate their own learning.
b.There is a growing demand for the assessment of learning in the three domains.
c.Teachers need to rely upon the objective quantification of test results for grading purposes.
d.Students, teachers, and parents participate in the planning and implementation of evaluation activities.
4.Which of the following types of assessment dwells on what the students can actually do in real-life situation?
a.authentic assessment
b.criterion-reference assessment
c.diagnostic assessment
d.placement assessment
MODULE CONTENT
Reduced to the barest components, the educative process happens between the teacher and the
student. Education originated from the terms “educare” or “educere” which meant “to draw out.” Ironically,
however, for centuries we succeeded in perpetuating the belief that education is a “pouring in” process wherein
the teacher was the infallible giver of knowledge and the student was the passive recipient. It followed that the
focus of instruction was content and subject matter. We were used to regarding education basically in terms of
designating a set of subjects to take and when the course is completed we pronounce the students “educated”
assuming that the instruction and activities we provided will lead to the desired knowledge, skills and other
attributes that we think the course passers would possess.
1. It is student-centered; that is, it places the students at the center of the process by focusing on Student
Learning Outcomes (SLO).
2. It is faculty-driven; that is, it encourages faculty responsibility for teaching, assessing program outcomes
and motivating participation from the students.
3. It is meaningful; that is, it provides data to guide the teacher in making valid and continuing improvement
in instruction and assessment activities.
To implement outcomes-based education on the subject or course level, the following procedure is
recommended:
1. Identification of the educational objectives of the subject/ course. Educational objectives are the broad
goals that the subject/course expects to achieve, and defining in general terms the knowledge, skills and attitude
that the teacher will help the students to attain. The objectives are stated from the point of view of the
teacher such as: “to develop, to provide, to enhance, to inculcate, etc.”
2.Listing of learning outcomes specified for each subject/ course objective. Since subject/course objectives
are broadly stated, they do not provide detailed guide to be teachable and measureable. Learning outcomes are
stated as concrete active verbs such as: to demonstrate, to explain, to differentiate, to illustrate, etc. A good
source of learning outcomes statements is the taxonomy of educational objectives by Benjamin Bloom. Bloom’s
taxonomy of educational objectives is grouped into three (3):
Cognitive, also called knowledge, refers to mental skills such as remembering, understanding, applying,
analyzing, evaluating, synthesizing/creating.
Psychomotor, also referred to as skills, includes manual or physical skills, which proceed from mental
activities and range from the simplest to the complex such as observing, imitating, practicing, adapting
and innovating.
Affective, also known as attitude, refers to growth in feelings or emotions from the simplest behavior to
the most complex such as receiving, responding, valuing, organizing, and internalizing.
3.Drafting outcomes assessment procedure. This procedure will enable the teacher to determine the degree
to which the students are attaining the desired learning outcomes. It identifies for every outcome the data that will
be gathered which will guide the selection of the assessment tools to be used and at what point assessment will
be done.
Immediate outcomes are competencies/skills acquired upon completion of a subject, a grade level, a
segment of the program, or of the program itself.
Examples:
Ability to communicate in writing and speaking
Mathematical problem-solving skill
Skill in identifying objects by using the different senses
Ability to produce artistic or literary works
Ability to do research and write the results
Ability to present an investigative science project
Skill in story-telling
Promotion to a higher grade level
Graduation from a program
Passing a required licensure examination
Initial job placement
5|[Educ222] Assessment of Student Learning 1
Deferred outcomes refer to the ability to apply cognitive, psychomotor and affective skills/competencies
in various situations many years after completion of a subject; grade level or degree program.
Examples:
Success in professional practice or occupation
Promotion in a job
Success in career planning, health and wellness
Awards and recognition
These are the attributes that a graduate of an institution is expected to demonstrate 3 or more than 3
years after graduation.
Outcomes in Outcomes-based Education (OBE) come in different levels:
1.Institutional
2.Program
3.Course
4.Learning/Instructional/Lesson outcomes
Institutional outcomes are statement of what the graduate of an educational institution are supposed to
be able to do beyond graduation. Program outcomes are what graduates of particular educational programs or
degrees are able to do at the completion of the degree or program. Course or subject outcomes are what students
should be able to demonstrate at the end of a course or a subject. Learning or instructional outcomes are what
students should be able to do after a lesson or instruction.
Institutional outcomes are broad. These institutional outcomes become more specific in the level of
program or degree outcomes, much more specific in the level of course or subject outcomes and most specific in
the level of learning or instructional outcomes.
Educational objectives are formulated from the point of view of the teacher. Learning outcomes are what
students are supposed to demonstrate after instruction.
Measurement as used in the education is the qualification of what students learned through the use of tests,
questionnaires, rating scales, checklists and other devices.
Assessment refers to the full range of information gathered and synthesized by teachers about their students
and their classrooms.
Evaluation is the process of making judgments, assigning value or deciding on the worth of students’
performance
Test is a set of question with an accepted set of presumably correct answers, designed to gather
information about some new individual characteristics, like scholastic achievement. Test, like all other
devices, can be influence by some factors that contribute to errors in gathering valid and reliable
information. We call this phenomena as measurement error. These concern us for three reason.
First, test are only tools, and tools can be appropriately used, unintentionally misused, and intentionally
abused.
Second, test, like other tools can be well-designed or poorly designed.
Third, both well-designed and poorly designed tools in the hand of ill-trained users can be dangerous.
Tests can either be written, oral or performed. Written test are the most widely used type of tests. Here, only
the cognitive domain of learning is given attention. Evaluation based on the results of tests alone does not picture
out the total development of an individual learner.
Non-test are devices that do not force students to give their responses. These are usually based on the
teachers’ direct observations as students perform the assigned tasks. In short, it is the teachers who does the
assessment as he observes students act out the values and skills that are essential in the performance of a
learning activity. However, there is a need to objectivize the quantification of these observations. To make the
observation objective, the teacher should develop valid and reliable non-test instruments like observation
checklist, rating scales, semantic differentials, anecdotal records and the like.
Non-test instrument can be designed to quantify the desirable of students’ behavior and skills. Most
teachers consider students’ behavior as a factor for the final school rating. At times it is difficult to justify the rating
that teachers give because there is no proof to show the strategies used for quantifying these behaviors. Teachers
usually find it difficult to justify their stand when parents raise an issue about the inclusion of behavior as a factor
for the computation of final rating. These teachers can shield themselves from negative parental impressions if
the information drawn from non-test instruments is used to supplement test results.
Testing is a process of administering a test to an individual or a group of students. This process involves
steps such as test preparation, test administration and collection of test papers.
Lucas and Corpus (2007) define assessment as a process of gathering information about the students
learning and then analyzing and interpreting them for the purpose of making decisions. They further assert that
assessment may involve, among others, activities such as administering different kinds of written test, observation
of behavior or performance, examination of work samples, use of checklist, and interview.
According to Cohen, there are at least nine types of assessment. These are: 1) norm-referenced; 2) criterion-
referenced; 3) domain-referenced; 4) diagnostic; 5) formative; 6) summative; 7) ipsative; 8) authentic and 9)
performance. Classroom teachers are given the options to select one or more assessment method for a specific
learning activity.
Norm-referenced assessment gives us information on what a student can do in comparison
with other students in the class.
Criterion-referenced assessment uses specific preset criteria from which a student’s performance
is compared without referring to other students’ performance.
Domain-referenced assessment determines learning in a particular field or area of the subject
matter and the three domains of learning.
Diagnostic assessment identifies weaknesses, strengths, and problems of students’ learning.
Formative assessment pinpoints whether students have achieved the objective of the lesson taught.
Summative assessment is considered as the terminal assessment of learning. It comes at the end
of the unit, program, term, or school year.
Ipsative assessment refers to the process of self-assessment.
Authentic assessment determines what students can actually do in real-life situations rather than
using some-easy-to-score responses to questions.
Performance assessment is undertaken to determine whether students can demonstrate their
learning through performance or simulated situations.
Classroom teachers should take note that the more assessment serves one purpose, the less it
can serve another. For example, the more the teacher moves towards grade-related assessment
(summative assessment), the more he departs from diagnostic, formative and other forms of assessment. This
means that teachers should use varied forms of assessment.
1.Validity
A valid assessment procedure is one which actually tests what it sets out to test, i.e., one which accurately
measures the behavior described by the learning outcomes under scrutiny.
2.Reliability
The reliability of an assessment procedure is a measure of the consistency with which the question, test or
examination produces the same result under different but comparable conditions.
3.Practicability
For most purposes, assessment procedures should be realistically practical in terms of their cost, time taken and
ease of application.
4.Fairness
To be fair to all students, an assessment must accurately reflect the range of expected behaviors’ as described
by published course outcomes
5, Usefulness to students
Student should also find assessment useful in that it contributes to the effectiveness of their learning.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Task 1. Develop
Direction: Differentiate each of the following pairs by explaining the meaning of each and giving examples for
further clarification.
Task 2. Apply
Direction: The following are educational objectives for the subject Elementary Science (K to 12). For every
educational objective, formulate two learning outcomes:
1.2 The
students can
Task 3. Reflect
1.What important points do you realize as you study about the basic concepts of assessment?
3.When you become a professional teacher, what are you going to avoid the negative effect of malpractice in the
classroom evaluation?
4. Differentiate the learning outcomes, “To develop communication skills” and “can communicate orally and in
writing”.
PRETEST
A. Each of the following statements refers to either (a) measurement, (b) assessment and (c) evaluation. On the
blank before each number, write the letter corresponding to your answer.
1. Over-all goal is to provide information regarding the extent of attainment of student learning
outcome.
2. Can help educators determine the success factors of academic programs and projects.
3. Uses such instruments as ruler, scale, or thermometer.
4. Used to determine the distance of a location.
5. Process designed to aid educators make judgment and indicate solutions to academic situations.
6. Can determine skill attainment easier than attainment of understanding.
7. Process of gathering evidence of student competencies/skills over a period of time.
8. Results show the more permanent learning and clear picture of student’s ability.
9. Objects of study may be instructional programs, school projects, teachers, students or test
results.
10. Usually expressed in quantities.
MODULE CONTENT
With the change of focus in instruction from content to learning outcomes came the need to redefine and
clarify the terms used to determine the progress of students towards attainment of the desired learning outcomes.
These are measurement, assessment and evaluation.
Measurement, assessment and evaluation are essential to student success in education. The purpose
of assessment is manifold: Assessment yields rich data to evaluate student learning, the effectiveness of
teaching, and the achievement of the prescribed curriculum outcomes. However, assessment without evaluation
is insufficient, as the collection and reporting of data alone are not entirely useful unless the quality of the data is
evaluated in relation to the outcomes. To this end, teachers use rubrics, criteria, marking keys, and other objective
guides to evaluate the work of their students.
Measurement is a process of quantifying or assigning number to the individual’s intelligence, personality,
attitudes and values, and achievement of the students. In other words, express the assessment data in terms of
numerical values and answer the question, “how much?”.
Assessment is the process of collecting information about student learning (for example, through
observation, portfolios, pencil-and-paper tests, performance). Assessment is the gathering of pertinent
information.
Evaluation follows assessment by using the information gathered to determine a student’s strengths,
needs, and progress in meeting the learning outcomes. Evaluation is the process of making judgments or
decisions based on the information collected in assessment.
2.1 Functions of
Assessment Assessments
for Learning
Assessments are designed with a purpose. Some assessments are designed by teachers as
assessments “for” learning. The purpose of these assessments is, in part, to assist students in their progress
towards the achievement of prescribed curriculum outcomes. In such assessments, the tasks used by teachers
should inform students about what kinds of mathematical knowledge and performances are important.
As well, assessments for learning, help teachers to know where their students are on the learning
continuum, track each student’s progress, and plan what “next steps” are required for student success. Following
assessments for learning, teachers help students toward the achievement of a learning outcome by providing
them with further opportunities to learn. In this way, such assessments take a developmental perspective and
track students’ growth through the year.
Assessment as Learning
Some assessments for learning are designed specifically to encourage student involvement and provide
students with a continuous flow of information concerning their achievement. When students become involved in
the process of assessment, it becomes assessment “as” learning. Assessment techniques such as conversation,
interviews, interactive journals, and self-assessment help students to articulate their ideas and understandings
and to identify where they might need more assistance. Such techniques also provide students with insight into
their thinking processes and their understandings.
This kind of assessment is used not only to allow students to check on their progress, but to advance
their understandings, to encourage them to take risks, to allow them to make mistakes, and to enhance
their learnings. This kind of assessment also helps students to monitor and evaluate their own learning, to
take responsibility for their own record keeping, and to reflect on how they learn.
Teachers should keep in mind that such assessment practices may be unfamiliar to students at first, and
that the emphasis on their being actively involved and thinking for themselves will be a challenge for some
students. Such practices, however, enable teachers and students, together, to form a plan that ensures students
are clear about what they have to do to achieve particular learning outcomes.
Assessments of Learning
Assessments “of” learning provide an overview of a student’s achievement in relation to the outcomes
documented in the curriculum that form the basis for the student’s learning requirements. When an assessment
of learning achieves its purpose, it provides information to the teacher for the grading of student work in relation
to the outcomes.
Final assessments of learning should be administered after the student has had the fullest opportunity
to learn the intended outcomes in the program. Assessments of learning check for a student’s achievement
against the outcomes. It should be noted that any assessment for learning that reveals whether a student has
met the intended outcome can also be considered assessment of learning, and the evaluation of that assessment
may be used to report on the student’s achievement of the outcome. Assessments “as,” “for,” and “of” learning
are what teachers do in a balanced classroom assessment process.
There are ways of describing classroom tests and other assessment procedures. This table is a summary of the
different types of assessment procedures that was adapted and modified from Gronlund, Linn and Miller (2009)
Types of
Classification Function of Assessment Examples of Instrument
Assessment
Maximum It is used to determine what individual
Aptitude tests, Achievement test
Nature of Performance can do when performing at their best
assessment It is used to determine what individuals Attitude, interest and personality
Typical
will do under natural conditions. inventories; observational
Performance
techniques; peer appraisal
An assessment used to measure
Fixed- Choice
knowledge and skills effectively and Standard multiple-choice
Test
efficiently
Form of
An assessment procedure used to Hand-on laboratory experiment,
Assessment Complex –
measure the performance of learner in experiment project, essay, oral
performance
context and on problem valued in their presentation.
Assessment own right
An assessment procedure used to Readiness tests, aptitude tests,
determine the learner’s prerequisite pretests on course objective self-
Placement
skills, degree of mastery of the course report inventories observational
goal; and/or best modes of learning techniques
An assessment procedure used to Teacher-made tests , custom
determine the learner’s learning progress made test from textbook
Formative
,provides feedback to reinforce learning publishers, observational
,and corrects learning error techniques
An assessment procedure used to
Use/Role in determine the causes of learners Published diagnostic test, teacher
classroom Diagnostic persistent learning difficulties such as –made diagnostic tests,
instruction intellectual physical , emotional and observational techniques
environmental difficulties
An assessment procedure used
Teacher-made survey,
determine the en-of- course achievement
Summative performance rating scale, product
for assigning grades or certifying
scale
mastery of objectives
Teacher-made tests, custom-
It is used to describe student made tests from textbook
performance according to a specified publishers, observational
Criterion
domain of clearly defined learning task. techniques
referenced
Example: multiplies three-digit to whole -Cognitive
Method of numbers correctly and accurately. -Affective
interpreting result -Psychomotor
It is used to describe student’s
Standardized aptitude and
performance according to relative
achievement tests, teacher made
Norm-referenced position in some known group.
survey test interest inventories,
Example: rank 5th in a classroom group of
adjustment inventories
40
There are different types or modes of assessment used by a classroom teacher to assess the learning
progress of the student. These are traditional assessment alternative assessment, performance –based
assessment, and portfolio assessment.
(a)Traditional Assessment
It is a type of Assessment in which the student choose their answer from a given list of choices. Example
of this type of assessment are multiple –choice test, standard true/false test, matching type test, and fill-in- the
blank test. In the traditional assessment students are expected to recognize that there is only one correct or best
answer for the question asked.
(b)Alternative Assessment
An assessment in which students create an original response to answer a certain question. Students
respond to a question using their own ideas; in their own ideas, in their own word. Example of alternative
assessment are short answer question, essay oral presentation exhibition, demonstration, performance
assessment and portfolios. Other activities included in this type are teacher observation and student self –
assessment.
(c)Performance-based Assessment
Performance assessment (Mueller, 2010) is an assessment in which student are asked to perform real-
world tasks that demonstrate meaningful application of essential knowledge and skills.
It is a direct measure of student performance because the tasks are designed to incorporate context,
problems and solution strategies that students would use in real life. It focus on processes and rationales. There
is no single correct answer, instead student are led to craft polished, thorough and justifiable responses,
performances and product. It also involved long-range, exhibit, and performance that are linked to the curriculum.
In this kind of assessment, the teacher is an important collaborator in creating tasks, as well as in developing
guidelines for scoring and interpretation.
Portfolio is a purposeful collection of student work that exhibit the student’s efforts, progress and achievements
in one or more areas over period of time. It measures the growth and development of student.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Task 1. Develop
Direction: Differentiate each of the following pairs by explaining the meaning of each and giving examples for
further clarification. Answer must be based on your understanding.
Task 2. Apply
A.List down three (3) activities or processes involved in each of the following:
(a)Measurement
(b)Assessment
(c)Evaluation
Assess what?
What methods to
used?
Task 3. Reflect
A. In terms of the different types of assessment procedures, cite one (1) issue that can be observe inside the
classroom related to the assessment of students’ learning?
Types of Issues related to the assessment of
Classification Possible Solution on the Issue
Assessment students’ learning
Maximum
Performance
Nature of
assessment
Typical
Performance
Fixed- Choice
Test
Form of
Assessment
Complex –
performance
Assessment
Placement
Formative
Use/Role in
classroom Diagnostic
instruction
Summative
Criterion
referenced
Method of
interpreting result
Norm-referenced
Chapter 3 – Program Outcomes
Course Outcomes
At the end of the topic, the students must have:
1. Clarified the program outcomes for teacher education
2. Distinguished the six levels of knowledge under the cognitive domain
3. Discussed the psychomotor categories in the psychomotor domain of objective
4. Discussed the six levels of learning objective in the affective domain
5. Discussed Kendall’s and Morgan’s new taxonomy
Time Allotted: hrs
PRETEST
A.Draw the pyramid representing the types of learning level for the Cognitive, Psychomotor and Affective Domain.
B.Define Cognitive, Psychomotor and Affective Domain.
MODULE CONTENT
In this chapter, you will distinguish program outcomes from learning outcomes. Learning outcomes come
in three (3) different domains – cognitive, psychomotor and affective. You will also be introduced to Kendall’s and
Marzano’s five levels of processing information, mental procedures and psychomotor procedures.
3.1 Program Outcomes and Student Learning Outcomes
The shift of focus in education from content to student learning outcomes has changed teachers’
instructional perspectives. In the past, teachers were often heard about their concern to finish their subject matter
before end of the term. Maybe because of the number of their students or failure to clarify the desired learning
outcomes, teacher’s concern for outcomes was secondary to the completion of the planned content for the
subject. In short, teachers were more content – centered than outcomes – centered.
The new educational perspective requires teachers to visualize the ideal graduates three or more years after
graduation and right after completion of the program, i.e., graduation time (as stated in institutional outcomes and
program outcomes. The Commission on Higher Education, the body that regulates higher education in the
Philippines in its Memorandum Order # 20, s. 2014 requires the following program for all higher education
institutions the ability to:
a) Articulate and discuss the latest developments in the specific field of practice;
b) Effectively communicate orally and in writing using both English and Filipino;
c) Work effectively and independently in multi – disciplinary and multi – cultural teams;
d) Act in recognition of professional, social, and ethical responsibility; and
e) Preserve and promote “Filipino historical and cultural heritage”.
Some program outcomes are based on types of higher education institutional (HEI) because this determines
the focus and purpose of the HEI. For example:
Figure 2
Bloom’s and Anderson’s Compared (Source: Wilson, Leslie O. 2001)
20 | [ E d u c 2 2 2 ] A s s e s s m e n t o f S t u d e n t L e a r n i n g
1
Benjamin Bloom critically examined his own cognitive taxonomy and he noted that there is a fundamental
difference between the knowledge category (first level in his taxonomy) and the mental operation (higher 5 levels
in his taxonomy – comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation) performed on that knowledge
or with that knowledge. Mere recall of knowledge is different from comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis
and evaluation of that knowledge.
In the revised cognitive taxonomy, Anderson and Krathwohl identified 4 levels of knowledge: 1) factual
knowledge 2) conceptual knowledge 3) procedural knowledge 4) metacognitive knowledge. If you compare the
specific types of knowledge given by Bloom, take note that the first 3 categories – factual, conceptual and
procedural knowledge – were cited by Bloom.
Factual knowledge – As the name implies, this refers to facts. This refers to essential facts, terminology, details
or elements students must know or be familiar with in order to understand a discipline or solve a problem in it.
Conceptual knowledge – This refers to the interrelationship of facts. It is facts put together within a within larger
structure that enable them to function together. It is knowledge of classifications, principles, generalizations,
theories, models or structure pertinent to a particular disciplinary area.
Procedural knowledge – This is knowing how to do something. Refers to information or knowledge that helps
students to do something specific to a discipline, subject or area of study. It includes knowledge of methods of
inquiry, criteria for using skills, algorithms, techniques and methods.
Metacognitive knowledge – This is knowing that you know. This is thinking about your own thinking in a
purposeful way. It is awareness and knowledge of one’s own cognition. It is reflective knowledge about how to
go about solving problems and cognitive task. It includes contextual and conditioning knowledge and knowledge
of self.
As shown in Table 1.1 in the revised cognitive taxonomy, the cognitive processes start with remembering
and end with creating knowledge along factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive dimensions.
Table 1.2 Revised version from Original by Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R.., et al (Eds.,) (2001)
Factual Knowledge – Basic information
Knowledge of terminology Vocabulary terms, mathematical symbols, musical
notation, alphabet
Knowledge of specific details and elements Components of the Food Pyramid, names of
congressional representatives, major battles of WWII
Conceptual Knowledge – The relationship among pieces of a larger structure that make them function
together
Knowledge of classifications and categories Species of animals, different kinds of arguments,
geological era
Knowledge of classifications and generalizations Types of conflict in literature, Newton’s Law of Motion,
principles of democracy
Knowledge of theories, models and structure Theory of evolution, economic theories, DNA models
Procedural Knowledge – How to do something
Knowledge of subject – specific skills and algorithms Procedure for solving quadratic equations, mixing
colours for oil painting, serving a volleyball
Knowledge of subject – specific techniques and Literary criticism, analysis of historical documents,
methods. mathematical problem solving method
21 | [ E d u c 2 2 2 ] A s s e s s m e n t o f S t u d e n t L e a r n i n g
1
Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use Method appropriate for different kinds of experiment,
appropriate procedures. statistical analysis procedures used for different
situations, syllabus guidelines for different genres of
writing.
Metacognitive knowledge – Knowledge of thinking in general and your thinking in particular
Strategic knowledge Ways of memorizing facts, reading comprehension
strategies , methods of planning a Web site
Knowledge about cognitive tasks, including Different reading demands of textbooks and novels;
appropriate contextual and conditional knowledge thinking ahead when using a electronic database;
differences between writing emails ad writing
business letters
Self – knowledge Need for a diagram or chart to understand complex
processes, better comprehension in quiet
environments, need to discuss ideas with someone
before writing an essay
However, others have identified five contents or artifacts (Clark, Chopeta, 2004; Clark, Mayer, 2007):
When the cognitive and knowledge dimensions are arranged in a matrix, as shown below,
it makes a nice performance aid for creating performance objectives:
Here are the examples of cognitive activities from the lowest to the highest cognitive process.
1.2 Understanding: Distinguish, estimate, explain, Explain in one’s own words the
comprehending the meaning, give example, interpret, stages in the life cycle of a
translation and interpretation of paraphrase, summarize butterfly; distinguish among the
instructions; state a problem in different geometric figures
one’s own word
1.3 Applying: using what was Apply, change, compute, Use a mathematical formula to
learned in the classroom in similar construct, demonstrate, discover, solve an algebra problem; prepare
new situation modify prepare, produce, show, daily menus for one week for a
solve, use family six.
1.4 Analyzing: separating Analyze, compare, contrast, Observe a classroom and list
materials or concept into diagram, differentiate, distinguish, down the things to be improved;
component parts to understand illustrate, outline, select. differentiate the parts of the three
the whole
1.5 Evaluating: judging the value Compare, conclude, criticize, Defend a research proposal;
of an idea, object or material. critique, defend, evaluate, relate, select the most effective solution;
support, justify. critique a class demonstration.
1.6 Creating: Building a structure Categorize, combine, compile, Compile personal records and
or pattern; putting parts together. compose, devise, design plan, document into a portfolio; write a
organize, revise, rearrange, syllabus for a school subject.
generate, modify,
In the early seventies, E Simpson, Dave and A.S. Harrow recommended categories for the Psychomotor
Domain which include physical coordination, movement and use of the motor skills body parts. Development of
these skills requires constant practice in accuracy and speed. Simpson contributed 7 categories, Dave 5
categories and Harrow 6 categories.
Table 2.1 Domain II: Psychomotor (Skills) (Simpson)
Category Example and Key Words (verbs)
Perception (awareness): The ability Examples: Detects non-verbal communication cues. Estimate where ball
to use sensory cues to guide motor will land after it is thrown and then moving to be correct location to catch
activity. This ranges from sensory the ball. Adjusts heats of stove to correct temperature by smell and taste of
stimulation through cue selection to food. Adjust the height of the forks on a forklift by comparing where the
translation forks are in relation to the pallet.
Manipulation- being able to perform Example: Being able to perform a skill on one’s own after taking
certain actions by memory. lesson or reading about it. Follows instructions to build a model.
Physical Abilities (fitness)- Stamina that must be Examples: gain strength, run a marathon
developed for further development such as strength Key Words: agility, endurance, strength
and agility.
Skilled movements- advanced learned movements as Example: Using an advanced series of integrated
one would find in sports or acting. movements, perform a role in a stage play or play in
a set of series in a sport game.
Table 3. The categories / levels of Affective Domain Learning objectives arranged hierarchically
Table 4. The Categories/ Levels of the Affective Domain
Categories/Levels Outcome Verbs Learning Outcomes Statements
3.1 Receiving: Select, point to sit, choose, Listen to others with respect, try to
being aware or sensitive to describe, follow, hold, identify, remember profile and facts.
something and being willing to name, reply.
listen or pay attention.
3.2 Responding: Answer, assist, and , comply, Participate in discussion gives
showing commitment to respond in conform, discuss, greet, help, expectations; know the rules and
some measure to the idea or perform, practice, read, recite, practice them; question concepts in
phenomenon. report, tell, write, order to understand them well.
3.3 Valuing: Complete, demonstrate, Demonstrate belief in the concept or
showing willingness to be differentiate, explain, follow, process; show ability to resolve.
perceived as valuing or favoring invite, join, justify, propose, report,
certain ideas. share, study, perform
3.4 Organizing: Arrange, combine, complete, Accept responsibility, recognize the need
arranging values into priorities, adhere, alter, defend, explain, for balance between freedom and
creating a unique value system by formulate, integrate, organize, responsible behavior, explain how to
comparing relating and relate synthesize solve problem; prioritize time effectively
synthesizing values. for family, work and personal life
problems/conflicts propose plan for
improvement, and inform
management/supervisor on matters that
need attention.
3.5 Internalizing: Act, display, influence, listen, Show self-reliance when asking;
practicing value system that discriminate, listen, modify, cooperate in group activities;
controls one’s behavior that is perform, revise solve, verify demonstrate objectivity in problem
consisted pervasive, predictable solving ; revise judgment in light of new
and characteristics of the person. evidences, value people for what they
In some source internalizing is are not for how they look.
equated to characterization
Task 1. Develop
Direction: The following are examples of learning outcome, in the second column, write the domain in
which each outcome is classified and in the third column the level/category to which the learning outcome
belongs.
Note:
*Use Harrow’s Classification for Psychomotor Domain.
**Use Bloom’s and Anderson’s taxonomy for Cognitive Domain.
Task 2. Apply
Direction: Using the indicated topic or subject matter, write the learning outcomes for each of the 3
domains arranged from the simplest to the most complex level or category.
A.Cogintive
Topic: Photosynthesis
1.Remembering
2.Understanding
3.Applying
4.Analyzing
5.Evaluating
6.Creating
B.Psychomotor
Topic: Group Games (Basketball)
1.Perception
2.Set
3.Guided response
4.Mechanism
5.Complex Overt Response
6.Adaptation
7.Origination
C.Affective
Topic: Developing and nurturing honesty
1.Receiving
2.Responding
3.Valuing
4.Organizing
5.Internalizing
Task 3. Reflect
Direction: Based on Kendall’s and Marzano’s new taxonomy, select learning competencies from K to 12
Curriculum Guide to illustrate levels’ of difficulty found in the new taxonomy of Kendall’s and Marzano’s new
taxonomy in Figure 5.