Ssp112-Bsn1c-Voyage of Magellan-Banzon, Hazel Anne
Ssp112-Bsn1c-Voyage of Magellan-Banzon, Hazel Anne
Ssp112-Bsn1c-Voyage of Magellan-Banzon, Hazel Anne
BSN-1C
1.) Who is Antonio Pigafetta? What is his role in the Magellan Elcano expedition?
-Antonio Pigafetta was an Italian scholar and explorer from the Republic of Venice . He
joined the expedition to the Spice Islands led by explorer Ferdinand Magellan under the
flag of King Charles I of Spain and, after Magellan's death in the Philippines , the
subsequent voyage around the world .
2.) According to Pigafetta, how did the locals of the island welcome Magellan and his
crew? 3. How are the islander's way of life, cultural practices, and religious beliefs
described?
-According to Pigafetta, locals like Rajah Humabon and his wife Juana welcomed
Magellan and his crewpeacefully. Magellan or one of his crew members were able to
cure the Rajah’s ill grandson, so in return, the latter has allowed some of his followers to
be baptized as christians. However, not all locals were very welcoming as Magellan was
soon killed by in a battle with another native leader, Lapu-lapu
3.) How are the islander's way of life, cultural practices, and religious beliefs described?
-The islander's way of life is described to be simple, nature dependent, and close knit of
family ties. Their culture and ways of living can be similar to the Malay influence, and
their own sense of tribe. Their religious beliefs would be mostly venerating various Gods
of nature.
4. What does Pigafetta's account tell us about the conditions of the Visayan islands in
thei6th century?
-The Pigafetta's account showed that the people of the Visayan Islands in the 16th
century lived a simple life but they were gradually changing because of the influence of
the voyagers.
-It began when Lapu-lapu, in their village, did not want to comply and follow the King of
Spain on his intent. Magellan get mad and did not go to Mactan. ... Philippines is the
time when Spanish Colonization happened.
-Agoncillo, deemed Pigafetta's manuscripts unreliable. Agoncillo declared that there was
no Philippine history before 1872, disqualifying Pigafetta's manuscripts. He considered these as
Spanish history as seen through the eyes of a European, instead of the eyes and the words of a
Filipino.