BOG of LPG
BOG of LPG
BOG of LPG
Your source for technology information for the gas processing industry
Open +
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is stored and transported in tanks as a cryogenic liquid, at a
temperature below its boiling point near atmospheric pressure. Due to heat entering the cryogenic
tank during storage and transportation, a portion of the LPG continuously evaporates, creating a gas
called boiloff gas (BOG). BOG causes evaporation losses in the LPG supply chain over time.
It is imperative to minimize vaporization and displacement losses due to the economic and safety
problems that can result from such losses. The amount of BOG depends on the design and operating
conditions of LPG plants. In the LPG supply chain, BOG can be reliquefied or sent to the flare and
burned. The evaluation of BOG in a storage tank in all operating scenarios is important for the correct
selection and design of a BOG compressor.
Different sources exist for the generation of BOG. These sources include heat leaks from ambient air
around the storage tank, heat ingress due to the dissipation of pumping power inside the tanks, heat
leaks from pipelines, flash vapor generated by liquid rundown and displaced vapor from the tank due
to liquid filling (known as the piston effect).
In this study, boundary conditions and parameters have been implemented to accurately estimate the
amount of BOG that evaporates at the C3 and C4 refrigeration and loading facilities at the Bandar
Abbas gas condensate refinery in Iran.
Study outline. The produced propane and butane from propane/butane splitter units are cooled
down in the propane/butane refrigeration unit via open-cycle refrigeration, and then run down to the
associated refrigerated tanks and stored at atmospheric pressure before being exported to overseas
markets via propane/butane carrier ships.
As shown in Fig. 1, butane rundown is subcooled at the required temperature level in two exchangers
in series, both utilizing propane. The chilled butane is then sent to the storage tanks.
1D
5D
1M
3M
1Y
2Y
Commodity Last Change
Crude Oil WTI 66.56 -0.17
Natural Gas (Henry Hub) 2.875s -0.064
FEATURED COLUMNS
Editorial Comment
-Adrienne Blume
At CERAWeek by IHS Markit, held in Houston
Fig. 1. Propane refrigeration BOG production. in March, IEA Director Fatih Birol said that the
world would soon see a major second wave of
shale gas production from the US in response
Propane is divided into two streams. One stream flows to the first exchanger and is flashed, and the to higher energy prices and growing demand
other stream is sent to the high-pressure C3 suction drums and then flashed in the second from India and China.
exchanger. Liquid propane from the suction drum is utilized in the second exchanger, and relevant
Regional Focus
flashed vapor is sent to medium-pressure C3 suction drums and then to the low-pressure C3 suction
-Shem Oirere
drums. Mozambique and Tanzania hold an estimated
180 Tft3 and 57 Tft3 of proven natural gas
Liquid propane flashes to lower pressure levels in medium- and low-pressure suction drums before
reserves, respectively.
being pumped to refrigerated storage tanks. Propane vapors result from the rundown product
pressure reduction, and flashes at the different pressure levels are compressed in two parallel, three-
stage centrifugal compressors, before being condensed in a C3 air cooler and a C3 compressor
condenser. Liquid propane is collected in a C3 accumulator and flashed again to the high-pressure Maximize Profitability with
suction drum to restart the cycle. Advanced Analytics at
Natural Gas Processing
Boiloff vapors from propane tanks are sent to the low-pressure suction drums and then to the first
Plants
compressor stage. No vapors develop from butane tanks due to the subcooling of the stored liquid
product. Register Now
Two tanks each are used for C3 and C4 storage. Since the boiloff calculation method can be used for Incorporating economic data
both types of storage tanks, calculations are described for only one of the C3 storage tanks. into process modeling is key
to optimizing operations and
Operating modes. To load propane and butane to the ship, it is necessary to cool down the pipelines maximizing profits at gas
at the lowest possible temperature, with the aim of reducing BOG production during the entrance to processing plants. However,
the ship compartments. Three steps are needed: preloading, loading and holding. Pre-loading maintaining optimal
includes two parts—the initial phase and the final phase—to achieve cooling of the pipeline with low operations are often
flowrates and appropriate pipeline temperature, respectively. challenging due to changing
market dynamics, contract
As a general rule, each tank follows three steps during normal operation:
structures and increasing
Filling mode: The tank receives the product from the process unit at rundown flowrates. process flexibility. Today, gas
During the filling mode, it is necessary to prepare the tank for ship loading; in project processors are leveraging
documentation, this operation is called preloading. Predictive Control and First
Emptying mode: When the ship is ready to receive the products (i.e., when the pipeline is at Principles models to
proper temperature, parcels are at proper temperature, loading arms are connected, etc.), accurately determine and
then it is possible to transfer the product from tank to ship. This operation is called loading.1 control the optimal operating
Holding mode: The tank is full of product and ready for ship loading, but the ship has not yet targets in real time based on
arrived or is not ready for loading. This operation is called holding. the most current plant
conditions and profitability,
To load propane to the ship, it is necessary to cool down the two pipelines at the lowest possible optimizing recovery of natural
temperature, with the aim of reducing BOG production when products enter the ship compartments. gas liquids. Learn how real-
Therefore, some days before the carrier ship arrives, circulation from the storage tank to the jetty and time analytics, combined with
back to the tank is started. This process is applied when the pipelines are in equilibrium with the decision support tools,
external temperature. empower companies to:
•Improve processing margins
The preloading mode is the most critical operating mode from the point of view of BOG production, by up to 5%
due to the great quantity of hot fluid trapped in the pipeline. For this reason, it is necessary to avoid a •Maximize NGL production
too-rapid displacement of the fluid to prevent abnormal overdesign of the BOG compressor. through improved availability
and optimized process
One of the major sources of boiloff production in liquefied gas handling is rollover, which can result in
conditions
a boiloff rate several times greater than normal, causing rapid over pressurization while venting a
•Improve compositional
considerable quantity of vapors to atmosphere. When the liquid layer adjacent to a liquid surface
control to operate closer to
becomes denser than the layers beneath due to boiloff of lighter fractions from the tank, stratification
product specifications
develops and causes rollover due to rapid mixing as a result of density inversion. An effective solution
is the mixing of the liquid in the tanks. For this purpose, two circulating pumps are placed inside the May 22, 2018 10am CDT
tank: one is always circulating the liquid and the other is used for cooling the transfer line.
Register Now
Calculation methods. BOG evaluation in all operating scenarios of the tank is important for the
correct definition of the flowrates to the BOG compressors.
Note: The contribution of BOG due to rapid atmospheric pressure variation is not considered, and is
negligible when compared to the other contributions. Also, the compensation effect due to outflow of
liquid from the tank is not considered.
BOG is calculated utilizing simulation software. The thermophysical properties of propane are
collected in Table 1. Required information for the calculation of BOG is presented in Table 2.
Calculations for the contribution to BOG by heat absorbed in tanks are shown in Eqs. 2 and 3.
(2), (3)
Heat ingress by storage tank is equal in the three cases of holding, preloading and loading. Equations
for the contribution to BOG by the transfer system are shown in Eqs. 4–9.
(8), (9)
where:
QNormal=21.3 m3/h
QMax=67.5 m3/h
Head=88.2 m
ΔP=SG × ΔH
BOG pertaining to lines (circulation, loading and transfer line) can be calculated manually using Eqs.
10–14.2
Calculations for the contribution to BOG by the circulation system are shown in Eqs. 15–20.
where:
QNormal=225 m3/h
Head=339 m
Calculations for the contribution to BOG by the loading system are shown in Eqs. 21–26.
(21), (22)
where:
QLoading=1,250 m3/h
Head=365.5 m
Calculations for the contribution to BOG by electric motors are shown in Eqs. 27–28.
(27), (28)
where:
The calculation for the contribution to BOG by vapor displacement is shown in Eq. 29.
(29)
The normal flowrate is 21.3 m3/h on the transfer pump when the system is in holding mode
The maximum pump flowrate is 67.5 m3/h for the transfer pump when the system is in
preloading mode (initial phase)
ρ is determined by the simulator and is derived from flashing before entrance to the storage
tanks.
The results for the different operating modes experienced by storage tanks are shown in Table 3.
Takeaway. The calculations described represent a simple approach for engineers to estimate
produced BOG ratio in cryogenic systems for LPG and LNG. The BOG ratio can be calculated
manually or with the use of a process simulator. GP
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author thanks the board of directors and the process division of Faradast Energy Falat Co., the
general contractor of Bandar Abbas Gas condensation refinery, for its support.
NOMENCLATURE
λ Latent heat
α Vapor fraction
W Mass flow
H Enthalpy
ρ Density
LITERATURE CITED
1Chen, C. C., “Fine-tune refrigerated LPG loading line operation,” Hydrocarbon Processing, August
2005.
2
Wordu, A. A. and B. Peterside, “Estimation of boiloff gas from refrigerated vessels in liquefied natural
gas plant,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, January 2013.
3Adom, E., et al. “Modelling of boiloff gas in LNG tanks: A case study,” International Journal of
Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2010, pp. 292–296.
| Projects |
Contact Us |
About Us |
Site Map |
Gulf Energy Info |
World Oil |
Hydrocarbon Processing |
Construction BoxScore |
Webcasts |
White Papers |
Newsletter
Sign-Up |
Advertise |
US Directory |
Subscribe Free |
Gastech-Show-Daily |
Please read our Term and Conditions, Cookies Policy, and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2018 Gulf Publishing Company.