Attainment of PO, PSO and CO: Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 26

Agnel Charities’

Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

2.6.2 Attainment of PO, PSO and CO


Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Attainment of Course Outcomes


Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Attainment of Course Outcomes

In the Outcome Based Education (OBE), assessment is done through one or more than one
processes, carried out by the department, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate
the achievement of course outcomes (CO’s).

The process for finding the attainment of Course outcomes uses various tools/methods.
These methods are classified into two types: Direct methods and indirect methods.

 Direct methods display the student’s knowledge and skills from their performance in
the class/assignment test, internal assessment tests, assignments, semester examinations,
seminars, laboratory assignments/practicals, mini projects etc. These methods provide a
sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of student
learning.
 Indirect methods such as course exit survey and examiner feedback to reflect on
student’s learning. They are used to assess opinions or thoughts about the graduate’s
knowledge or skills.

Rubrics are used for both formative and summative assessment of students. Same rubric is
used for assessing an outcome so that the faculty is able to assess student progress and
maintain the record of the same for each student. The rubrics are shared with students before
being evaluated so that they are aware of the performance criteria and their weightage.

Following tables show the various methods used in assessment process that periodically
documents and demonstrates the degree to which the Course Outcomes are attained. They
include information on:

a) Listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data, and

b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out.
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Table 1 : Direct Assessment tool used for CO attainment

Direct
Sr. Assessment
Assessment Description
No. frequency
Method

1. Internal Twice in a The Internal Assessment marks in a theory paper


Assessment Semester shall be based on two tests generally conducted at
Test the end of 6th and 11th weeks of each semester. It is
a metric used to continuously assess the attainment
of course outcomes w.r.t course objectives. Average
marks of two tests shall be the Internal Assessment
Marks for the relevant course.

2. Lab Once in a Lab Assignment/Experiment is a qualitative


Assignments / week performance assessment tool designed to assess
experiments students' practical knowledge and problem solving
skills. Minimum ten experiments need to be
conducted for every lab course.

3 End Semester Once in a End Semester examination (theory or practical) are


Examination Semester the metric to assess whether all the course outcomes
are attained or not framed by the course incharge.
4 Practical
End Semester Examination is more focused on
Semester
attainment of all course outcomes and uses a
Examination
descriptive questions.

5 Home Twice in a Assignment is a metric used to assess student’s


Assignments Semester analytical and problem solving abilities. Every
student is assigned with course related tasks &
assessment will be done based on their
performance. Grades are assigned depending on
their innovation in solving/deriving the problems.
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

6 Class / Twice in a It is a metric used to continuously assess the


Assignment Semester student’s understanding capabilities.
Test

7 Preliminary Once in a Preliminary examination is the metric to assess


Examination semester whether all the course outcomes are attained or not
by asking descriptive questions.

8 Presentations As per the Presentation is the metric used to assess student’s


requirement communication and presentation skills along with
depth of the subject knowledge. Seminars topics are
given to the students that cover topics of current
interest or provide in-depth coverage of selected
topics from the core courses.

Table 2: Indirect Assessment tool used for CO attainment

Sr. Indirect Assessment Method Description


No. Assessment frequency
Method

Course Exit Survey End of Collect variety of information about course


1 Semester outcomes from the students after learning entire
course.

The weightages given for various assessment tools used for the attainment of Course
Outcomes are shown in the following figure 1 and table 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Figure 1: List of Course Assessment tools

Table 3: List of Course Assessment tools

Tools Frequency Weightage

Assignment tests Twice in a


semester

Internal Twice in a
assessment semester

Assessment Internal Home Selected 80


Direct
Tools Tools Assignments Topic % 60% 80%
Practical Weekly

MOCK Practicals
Once in a
MCQ
semester
Seminar/Present
ations
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Mini Projects

Preliminary Once in a 20
Examination semester %

End Semester
External
Examination 40%
Once in a
Tools
semester

Course Exit
Survey/
Indirect -- Once in a Semester 20%
Examiners
feedback

Process to set Goal for course (effective from Second Half of 2015)

Course Outcome Attainment level is set based on previous three years’ average performance
levels in the university examination in that course. Process is given below:

1. Find out the average marks scored in each course in the last three years.
2. Find the number of students scoring above the average marks
3. This is set as middle level of goal setting [Level-2]
4. Depending on the trend of the result the lower level [Level-1] can be set by reducing 5% of
the students score than the middle level.
5. The upper level [Level-3] can be set by increasing 5% of the students score than the middle
level.
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

(Eg: Course Name: CSC305 Year of study 2017-2018)


SH- AVG of SH-
YEAR 2012(OL SH-2013 SH-2014 2012,SH-
D) 2013,SH-2014
Total Students 73 75 75 74
Total Marks 3133 3649 2676 3153
Class Average Marks (Total Marks/Total
43 49 36 42
Students)
% Class Average Marks 54 61 45 53
Number of students achieved the
48 50 49 38
Average Marks
% of the Number of students achieved
64 66 65 65
the Average Marks

Goal Set for DS (III SEM)


% of the student % of marks Level
60% 53% 3
65% 53% 2
70% 53% 1

Change of goal setting:

The Set level will be changed if all Course Outcomes of the subject are attained the Level-3.
This change in the goal can be done in two ways, either increase the average marks obtained
by the students or increase the percentage of students securing more than the average marks.
Since we have to bring maximum students to level-3 category, the change of average marks
will set only after 90% students securing more than previous average marks. Once it is
achieved increase the goal set by 2 – 5%
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Course Outcomes

CO-ID CO-Statement

C305.1 Demonstrate the concept of linear, nonlinear data structure

Design an algorithm to implement stack, queue data structures and apply the
C305.2
concept for an application

Design an algorithm to implement linked list data structures and apply the
C305.3
concept for an application

C305.4 Demonstrate the concept of tree and apply to solve the problems

C305.5 Demonstrate the concept of graph and apply to solve the problems

C305.6 Design an algorithm to implement sort and search operations

CO-PO and CO-PSO Correlation

COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

CSC305.1 3 2 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 1

CSC305.2 2 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2

CSC305.3 2 2 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2

CSC305.4 3 -- 2 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 1

CSC305.5 3 -- 2 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 1

CSC305.6 2 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2

Average 3 3 3 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Tools used for CO attainment

CO-ID CO Statement Tool1 Tool2

Demonstrate the concept of linear, nonlinear data Assignment Internal


C305.1
structure Test-1 Assessment-1

Design an algorithm to implement stack, queue data Assignment Internal


C305.2
structures and apply the concept for an application Test-1 Assessment-1

Design an algorithm to implement linked list data Internal


C305.3 Assignment-1
structures and apply the concept for an application Assessment-1

Demonstrate the concept of tree and apply to solve the Internal


C305.4 Class Test-1
problems Assessment-2

Demonstrate the concept of graph and apply to solve Assignment Internal


C305.5
the problems Test-2 Assessment-2

Design an algorithm to implement sort and search Assignment


C305.6 MCQ-1
operations Test-2

Question Papers used as a tools

i. Internal Assessment-1

Q. Marks CO
No
Answer any five
a Exemplify linear and non-linear Data structures 2
b. Demonstrate Circular and Priority Queue. 2
1
c.. State the difference between Singly Linked List and 2 (CO-1)
DoublyADT
d Define Linked
forList
Stack. List applications of Stack 2
e. List out the areas in which data structures are applied 2
f.. Exemplify
extensivelyinfix, postfix and prefix expression. 2
Answer any one
a Write a program to implement a creation of a singly
. linked
i) list and perform
Inserting a nodefollowing
at the endoperations
2 ii) Delete a node last node 5 (CO-3)
b Write a program to implement creation of a doubly
. linked
i) list and perform
Inserting a nodefollowing operations
after a specific node
ii) Delete a node after a specific node
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Answer any one


3 5 (CO-2)
a Develop a C program for queue using array
b. Develop a program for evaluation of postfix expression
. using stack

ii. Internal Assessment-2

Q. Mark CO
No s
Answer any five
a Exemplify threaded binary tree. 2
1 b. Draw Expression tree for infix expression (a+b)*(c-d)/f 2
c. Explain concept of Binary Search Tree with example 2 (CO-
d. Compare B tree with B+ tree 2 4)
e. Exemplify Splay tree . 2
f. Exemplify trie data structure 2
Answer
. any one
(CO-
2 a Exemplify different ways to represent graph . 5
5)
b. Write the function for BFS Traversal of a graph. Explain its
working with an example
Answer any one
a Apply the Huffman coding for the word MALAYALAM. Give
(CO-
3 the Huffman code for each symbol 5
4)
b Insert the following elements in AVL tree
. 44,17,32,78,50,88,48,62,54

iii. Assignment Test-1

Q. No Set-A Marks CO
1 Exemplify Different types of data structure . 5
CO-1
2 Illustrate applications of stack and queue 5
3 Write a program for circular queue using array 10 CO-2
Q. No Set-B Marks CO

1 Write Stack ADT and explain various applications of stack 5


CO-1
2 Demonstrate different application areas of data structures 5

3 Write a program for Postfix Evaluation 10 CO-2


Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

iv. Assignment Test-2

Q. No Set-A Marks CO

1 Apply Quick Sort with following data 5 CO-6


50,31,71,38,77,81,12,33
2 Exemplify BFS. 5 CO-5
3 Apply Radix Sort on 121,70,965,432,12,577,683 5 CO-6
4 Apply Heap Sort on 15,19,10,7,17,16 5 CO-6
Q. No Set-B Marks CO
1 Apply Quick Sort 30,70,20,50,40,10,60,80 5 CO-6

2 Exemplify DFS 5 CO-5


3 Apply Heap Sort on 121,70,965,432,12,577,683 5 CO-6
4 Apply Insertion on Sort 10,5,4,12,15,11,3 5 CO-6

iv. Prelim Question Paper

Questions Mark CO
Q.1 a. Exemplify Linear and Non-linear data structures . 5 CO1
State the difference between Singly linked list and Doubly linked 5
Q.1 b. CO3
list along with their application
Q.1 c. Write a C program for Insertion Sort 7 CO6
Q.1 d. Define ADT with an example 3 CO1
Construct Huffman Tree and determine the code for following
Q. 2 a. 10 CO4
characters of word “DATASTRUCTURES”
Q. 2 b. Write a C program for Postfix Evaluation 10 CO2
Q. 3 a. Write a C program in C to implement a priority queue. 10 CO3
Sort the elements using Radix Sort 121, 70, 965, 12,577,683.
Q. 3 b. 10 CO6
What are the limitations of radix sort
Write a C program to create "Circular Linked List" ADT. The
ADT should support the Following operations
Q. 4 a. 10 CO3
i) Creating a Circular Linked List
ii) Inserting a node after a specific node
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

iii deleting a node


iv) Displaying list

Q. 4 b Demonstrate various Graph Traversing Techniques. 10 CO5

Demonstrate the AVL trees. Insert the following elements in a


Q. 5 a. CO4
AVL tree 27,25,23,29,35,33,34 10
Using linear probing and quadratic probing insert the following
Q. 5 b. Values in Hash table of size 10. Show how many collisions occur 10 CO6
in each techniques 99,33,23,44,56,43,19
Exemplify index sequential search with a suitable example.
Q. 6 a. State the advantages and disadvantages of index sequential CO6
search 10
Write a program in C for deletion of a node from Binary Search
Q. 6 b. 10 CO4
Tree. The program should consider all the cases

CO-Tool Marks

Common
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6
Tools
Roll No Name of Student

PRELIM
ASS-1

MCQ
AT-1

AT-1

AT-2

AT-2
CT-2

ESE
IA-1

IA-1

IA-1

IA-2

IA-2

Maximum Marks 10 10 10 5 10 5 20 10 5 5 15 5 80 80

101601 A Annie Grace C 6 7 2 1 8 5 8 10 4 5 6 5 56 56


101602 Agwekar Atharva Ajit 3 10 7 5 9 5 0 10 5 5 1 5 64 76
101603 Banagar Amruta N. 7 1 1 4 5 5 9 9 5 5 5 0 55 73
101604 Bhilegaonkar Madhavi
1
4 7 3 1 6 4 10 10 0 3 8 3 38 56
101605 Borhade Vipul Gulabrao 4 4
0 0 5 9 5 17 10 4 5 7 3 55 44
101606 Bothraa Siddhi R. 3 10 5 5 9 1 8 9 4 5 6 5 62 72
101607 Britto Cyrus Valerian 2 9 4 0 8 5 8 9 4 5 9 5 51 60
101608 Cherian Joel Mathew 5 8 0 1 9 5 9 10 0 5 0 0 54 37
101609 Clarence Johnson 4 8 2 0 8 4 8 8 5 4 1 5 51 37
Joy
101610 Dalvi Anuj Shrikrishna 3 10 5 4 9 0 0 8 5 4 1 5 45 55
101611 Dandona Raveena
0
7 9 6 1 8 3 19 8 1 5 1 5 43 75
101612 Deshpande Siddhesh S
0
Rajeev 2 8 5 5 0 4 10 9 2 5 1 5 52 76
101613 Dsouza Aditya Sanjay
2
5 10 8 5 9 3 0 10 5 5 1 5 66 42
101614 Dutta Piya
0
6 9 4 1 8 5 15 8 0 4 0 0 33 50
101615 Fernandez Ahan Nelson
4
2 10 7 5 9 3 10 8 5 5 1 5 53 48
101616 Freddy Poly 3 10 7 1 9 5 16 10 5 3 1 5 49 76
101617 Gavin Henry Lewis
1
2 10 7 3 8 5 9 10 5 5 1 5 62 46
101618 Jackson Jonathan Bob
3
2 9 3 1 9 2 8 7 1 1 1 5 20 34
3
1
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

101619 Jadhav Tejesh Prakash 6 10 8 4 0 0 0 9 4 5 5 4 46 34


101620 Jithin K Thomas 2 6 7 1 8 0 9 8 0 2 0 0 32 56
101621 Joseph Blessingh Israel 4 8 7 3 8 4 10 9 0 5 0 0 54 66
101622 Kanatt Shruti Raju 5 8 6 5 8 5 10 8 2 4 1 5 62 43
101623 Kankariya Akash Sunil 6 3 4 4 9 4 10 9 5 3 1 5 58 41
101624 Kesarwani Saumya
4
4 9 0 5 7 0 16 10 5 5 1 5 57 76
101625 Khattar Rajshankar S.
4
4 8 0 5 8 5 9 10 4 5 1 5 65 28
101626 Kochara Abishai Aswini
2
5 10 5 1 0 4 8 10 4 5 9 0 32 75
101627 Kulkarni Arya Deepak
4
7 10 7 5 8 5 0 10 2 5 1 5 61 60
101628 Magdum Kaustubh 8 10 7 5 6 2 11 10 5 5 1 5 65 75
101629 Makasare Gaurav R 5 10 8 5 9 5 10 10 4 5 1 5 56 64
101630 Mathias Jovin Vincent
4
3 10 0 1 8 5 8 10 5 5 1 5 57 53
101631 Mathias Sandesh Sunny
0
8 10 7 0 9 0 8 9 0 5 0 0 46 65
101632 Mendes Edelquinn
2
4 9 7 5 9 5 9 10 2 3 1 5 60 50
101633 Nair Shruthi Viju 5 8 3 5 9 4 20 10 4 5 1 5 63 70
101634 Nimmy Augustine
3
5 10 7 4 8 5 18 10 0 5 0 0 60 57
101635 Nirmal Babu
1
2 10 7 5 7 5 0 10 4 3 1 4 55 68
101636 Noronha Ryan Sunil 3 0 4 1 6 4 18 9 5 0 1 5 49 56
101637 Pai Shreya Rajendra
1
4 7 7 4 9 5 13 9 5 5 1 4 61 59
101638 Palani Salome Nelson
0
5 10 7 4 1 5 14 8 5 5 6 5 64 46
101639 Parab Omkar Tulsidas
3
2 9 7 5 9 0 0 10 5 4 1 5 54 69
101640 Patel Naeem
0
4 10 7 0 5 5 0 10 0 3 9 5 63 71
101641 Patel Srujan
0
7 9 4 4 9 5 18 9 0 5 0 0 62 52
101642 Patil Anuja Dilip 4 9 1 5 9 4 11 9 5 5 1 5 62 56
101643 Patil Vaibhav Prakash 6 9 5 4 9 4 8 10 0 5 0 0 61 61
101644 Pereira Terrell Russel
4
8 10 7 0 7 5 10 10 0 5 9 0 50 65
101645 Philip Prasun Alexander 5 7 7 0 9 5 17 10 5 5 1 5 62 57
101646 Pushkarna Himanshu A. 3 10 2 4 9 5 0 10 4 1 1 5 41 74
101647 Reddy C Sai Vivaswanth
1
3 10 3 0 8 5 12 10 4 3 1 5 61 45
101648 Roselyn Lorson
0
0 5 6 6 7 7 6 19 5 7 6 7 31 19
101649 Shetty Shubham Dinesh
3
1 4 7 7 7 6 4 19 7 7 7 7 35 35
101650 Shinde Ankita Vijay 1 0 5 5 7 7 1 16 5 7 6 7 31 9
101651 Shinde Shantanu S. 2 0 5 7 7 7 0 10 7 7 7 5 50 1
101652 Shingate Kranti Bhau 1 5 5 5 7 6 0 11 7 7 6 5 46 6
101653 Singh Siddarth Satbir 0 2 6 7 7 6 4 13 7 7 7 7 41 18
101654 Sohi Yashveer Singh 6 4 6 5 7 6 0 12 5 5 6 7 47 11
101655 Srivastava Animesh N. 3 3 6 7 7 7 1 20 7 7 7 7 46 17
101656 Tanya Serah Jacob 4 14 8 6 7 7 0 19 7 7 7 5 45 38
101657 Telang Shruti Vikas 2 8 5 6 7 5 0 8 7 7 6 5 36 8
101658 Tiwari Dipak Kamlesh 9 14 8 7 7 5 7 20 7 7 7 7 24 69
101659 Varghese Jacob 1 10 5 6 7 7 4 19 5 7 6 7 32 46
101660 Vellikkara Harun Joe 0 4 5 7 7 7 1 17 7 7 7 7 44 17
101661 Verma Pragya Surendra 0 4 6 6 7 7 0 13 5 6 6 5 11 6
101662 Waghmare Ashriel S. 0 6 5 7 5 6 0 12 7 6 7 5 21 15
101663 Waghulade Mithilesh R. 1 13 5 5 7 7 4 16 5 7 6 7 42 27
101665 Jadhav Amey 1 9 5 7 7 6 2 11 7 6 7 7 36 33
101666 Patil Manali 0 3 5 6 7 6 6 13 7 7 6 5 37 14
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Summary of Course Exit Survey

Rating Percentage

No of students rated
CO- Course Outcome Average CO-Question
QUE Question '5' % '4' % '3' % '2' % '1' % % Attainment

Total number of students given


'60'
Course Exit Survey
Rate yourself based
on understanding of
1 the concept of linear, 19 32% 21 35% 17 28% 1 2% 1 2% 78% 3
nonlinear data
structure

Rate yourself based


on ability of
designing an
algorithm to
2 implement stack, 15 25% 22 37% 20 33% 1 2% 1 2% 75% 3
queue data
structures and apply
the concept for an
application

Rate yourself based


on ability of
designing an
algorithm to
3 12 20% 20 33% 21 35% 4 7% 0 0% 70% 3
implement linked list
data structures and
apply the concept for
an application

Rate yourself based


on understanding of
4 the concept of tree 10 17% 22 37% 22 37% 4 7% 0 0% 71% 3
and apply to solve
the problems

Rate yourself based


on understanding
5 the concept of graph 11 18% 22 37% 21 35% 2 3% 2 3% 71% 3
and apply to solve
the problems

Rate yourself based


on ability of
designing an
6 8 13% 20 33% 23 38% 5 8% 2 3% 67% 2
algorithm to
implement sort and
search operations
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Goal Set

% of Marks % of Student Attainment Level

53% 60% 1

53% 65% 2

53% 70% 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Summary of Course Assessment Calculation

External
Internal Assessment
Assessment

Indirect
Direct Assessment Assessm
ent Final
Int. Int. Ext
CO- Ext Attain
Course Outcome Attain Attain Attainm
ID Course Attainm ment
Tool1 Tool2 Prelim ment ment ent
Exit ent % Level
% Level Level
80% 20% Survey

80% 20%
60% 40%
Demonstrate the AT-1 IA-1
C305. concept of linear,
85% 78% 68.58 2 83.08% 3 2.4
1 nonlinear data
29.23% 93.85%
structure
Design an algorithm
to implement stack, AT-1 IA-1
C305. queue data
85% 75% 61.1 1 83.08% 3 1.8
2 structures and
apply the concept 38.46% 63.08%
for an application
Design an algorithm
AT-1 IA-1
to implement
C305. linked list data
85% 70% 80.28 3 83.08% 3 3
3 structures and
apply the concept 86.15% 78.46%
for an application
Demonstrate the
C305. concept of tree and
CT-1 IA-2
85% 71% 71.12 3 83.08% 3 3
4 apply to solve the
problems 35.38% 100%

Demonstrate the
C305. concept of graph
AT-2 IA-2
85% 71% 77.03 3 83.08% 3 3
5 and apply to solve
the problems 64.62% 89.23%

Design an algorithm AT-2 MCQ-1


C305. to implement sort
85% 67% 73.77 3 83.08% 3 3
6 and search
69.23% 76.92%
operations
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

CO-PO and CO-PSO Attainment

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
COs

CSC305.1 2.4 2.4 -- 2.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.4 2.4


CSC305.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 -- -- -- -- -- 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
CSC305.3 3 3 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3 3
CSC305.4 3 -- 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CSC305.5 3 -- 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CSC305.6 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3 3
Average 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.4 -- -- -- -- -- 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.7
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Attainment of Program Outcomes


and Program Specific Outcomes
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Attainment of POs and PSOs:

Assessment tools are categorized into Direct and Indirect methods to assess the program
outcomes. 80% weightage is given to direct methods and 20% to indirect methods.

 Direct methods display the students’ knowledge and skills from their performance in
the various academic activities like Internal Assessment Exams, End–Semester Examinations,
Assignment/Class Tests, Presentations, and Home Assignments, Quizzes, Practicals etc. These
methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong
evidence of student learning. Average of CO-PO attainment of all the courses is considered as
direct method assessment tool for PO attainment.
 Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews of the stakeholders to reflect on
student’s learning. They assess opinions or thoughts about the graduates’ knowledge
or skills valued by different stakeholders. The various indirect tools are:
 Program Exit Survey
 Surveys conducted on Co-curricular and Extra-curricular activities (PO6 and PO7).

The average of PO attainment of all surveys is considered for calculating the PO attainment.
the following figure 1 shows the various methods/tools used for calculating the PO attainment
along with weightage given to each method.

Figure 1: List of Program Assessment tools


Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

The Programme outcomes are difficult to measure such as assessing critical thinking,
creativity, analytical skills, and problem solving etc. Hence the department has adopted
Criterion Referenced Rubrics to assess the POs. The Rubric criteria are developed by
department faculty and distributed to students before being evaluated so that they are aware
of the performance criteria and their weightage.

The methods/tools used for the assessment process that periodically documents and
demonstrates the degree to which the Programme Outcomes are attained are shown below
including the information on:

a) Listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data, and

b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out.

Table 1: Direct Assessment tool used for PO attainment

Direct
Sr. Assessment
Assessment Description
No. frequency
Method

1. CO attainment of Once in a Minimum two internal tools (internal assessment


all courses Semester test, class/assignment test, seminar, quiz, practical,
mini project etc.) are used to find the attainment of
each course outcome along with the performance
of the students in preliminary exams and end
semester exams. the weightage provided for that is
80%. Course exit survey is also considered for the
attainment, that is conducted at the end of the
semester and 20% weightage is given for that.
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Table 2: Indirect Assessment tool used for PO attainment

Sr. Indirect Assessment Method Description


No. Assessment frequency
Method

Alumni Survey Once in two Collect variety of information about program


1
years outcomes from the Alumni students.

Program Exit Once in a Collect variety of information about program


2
Survey year outcomes from the outgoing students

Employer Survey Once in two Collect variety of information about the


3
years graduates’ skills, capabilities and opportunities

Survey on Co and Once in a Collect variety of information on students


4 Extra-curricular year on all capabilities and opportunities.
activities activities

The attainment of Course outcomes of every course is directly mapped to Program Specific
Outcomes.

PO &PSO Attainment of Academic Year of 2018-2019

Subject Subject PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO1 PO1 PO1 PSO PSO


Code Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 1 2
FEC101 AM-I 3 3 -- -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
FEC102 AP-I 3 3 -- 3 -- 3 3 -- -- -- -- 3 -- --
FEC103 AC-I 3 -- -- -- -- 3 3 -- -- -- -- 3 -- --
FEC104 EM 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- --
FEC105 BEE 2.5 2.6 -- 2.6 -- -- -- -- 2.5 -- -- -- -- --
FEC106 EVS 3 -- -- -- -- 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- --
FEC201 AM-II 2.9 2.9 -- -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
FEC202 AP-II 3 3 -- -- -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
FEC203 AC-II 2.8 -- -- -- -- 2.8 3 -- -- 3 -- 3 -- --
FEC204 ED 3 3 -- -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- --
FEC205 SPA 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

FEC206 CS -- -- -- -- 3 3 -- -- 3 3 3 3 -- --
CSC301 AM -III 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 --
CSC302 DLDA 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CSC303 DIS 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 --
CSC304 ECCF 2.6 2.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.6 -- -- -- 2.6
CSC305 DS 2.6 2.7 2.4 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 2.7 2.7
CSL301 DSL 2.7 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 2.8 3
CSL302 BEL 1.6 1.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.6
CSL303 DSL 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
CSL304 OOPL 2.5 2.6 2.6 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.4 2.6 2.6
CSC401 AM-IV 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 --
CSC402 AOA 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 -- --
CSC403 COA 1.2 1.4 1 -- 1.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- --
CSC404 CG 3 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CSC405 OS 1 1 1 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 1
CSL401 AOAL -- 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3 3
CSL402 CGL 3 3 3 3 3 -- -- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
CSL403 PAL 1 1 1 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 --
CSL404 OSL 1 1 1 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 1
CSL405 OSTL 1.5 -- 1.5 1.5 1.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.5 1.5 1.5
CPC501 MP 1.6 1.6 1.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- 1.6
CPC502 OS 2.4 2.4 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.3 2.4 2.6
CPC503 SOOAD 3 3 3 3 -- -- -- 3 -- -- 3 3 3 3
CPC504 CN 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CPL501 WTL 3 3 3 3 3 -- -- 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.8 1.8
CPL502 BCE -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
CPC601 SPCC 2.9 3 2.9 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.8 2.9 2.9
CPC602 SE 2.2 2.2 1.6 1 1.8 1.6 -- 2.2 1.8 -- 1.6 2.2 -- 2
CPC603 DD 2.2 1.6 2.2 -- -- -- -- 1 -- -- 1.8 2.2 2 2
CPC604 MCC 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CPE6011 SPM 2.2 -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- 2.2
CPL601 NPL -- 1 1 -- 1 -- -- 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1
CPC701 DSP 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
CPC702 CSS 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2
CPC703 AI 1 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.2 1 1.6 -- -- -- -- 1.2 1.3 1.3
CPE70425 SC 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CPE70426 ERP 3 3 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 3 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

PROJEC
CPP701 -- 2.9 -- 2.9 2.9 2.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.9 2.9
TI
CPL701 NTAL -- 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.8 -- -- 2.8 2.8 2.8 -- 2.8 -- --
CPC801 DWDM 2 1.6 1.6 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 -- --
CPC802 HMI 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2
CPC803 PDS 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
CPE8031 ML 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.1 1.1 1.2
CPE8035 BDA 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- 2.2 -- -- -- 2.2 -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2
PROJEC
CPP802 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
T II
CPL801 CCL 1.6 1.7 1.6 -- 1.5 1 -- -- 1 1 1 1.4 -- --

Direct Attainment
2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.3
(80%)

Progra
m Exit
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 -- --
Survey
(50%)
Indirect
Extra
Attainme
Curricu
nt (20%)
lar
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 3 3 -- --
Actviti
es
(50%)

2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.4
Average Attainment 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.3
2 2 4 6 6 8 6 2 2 4
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

Subject
Subject Name PSO1 PSO2
Code
FEC101 APPLIED MATHEMATICS-I 3 --
FEC102 APPLIED PHYSICS-I 3 --
FEC103 APPLIED CHEMISTRY -I 3 --
FEC104 ENGINEERING MECHANICS 3 --
FEC105 BASIC ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2.5 --
FEC106 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES 3 --
FEC201 APPLIED MATHEMATICS-II 2.9 --
FEC202 APPLIED PHYSICS-II 3 --
FEC203 APPLIED CHEMISTRY-II 2.8 --
FEC204 ENGINEERING DRAWING 3 --
FEC205 STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING APPROACH 3 3
FEC206 COMMUNICATION SKILLS -- 3
CSC301 APPLIED MATHEMATICS -III 3 --
CSC302 DIGITAL LOGIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS 3 3
CSC303 DISCRETE STRUCTURES 3 --
ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS AND COMMUNICATION
CSC304 -- 2.6
FUNDAMENTALS
CSC305 DATA STRUCTURES 2.7 2.7
CSL301 DIGITAL SYSTEM LAB 3 3
CSL302 BASIC ELECTRONICS LAB -- 2.2
CSL303 DATA STRUCTURE LAB 2.2 2.2
CSL304 OOPM(JAVA) LAB - 2.6 2.6
CSC401 APPLIED MATHEMATICS-IV 2.2 --
CSC402 ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS 3 3
CSC403 COMPUTER ORGANIZATION AND ARCHITECTURE 2 --
CSC404 COMPUTER GRAPHICS 3 3
CSC405 OPERATING SYSTEM 1.8 1.8
CSL401 ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS LAB 3 3
CSL402 COMPUTER GRAPHICS LAB 3 3
CSL403 PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE LAB 2.6 --
CSL404 OPERATING SYSTEM LAB 2.6 2.6
CSL405 OPEN SOURCE TECH(PYTHON & PERL) LAB 2.2 2.2
CPC501 MICROPROCESSOR -- 1.6
CPC502 OPERATING SYSTEMS 2.4 2.6
CPC503 STRUCTURED AND OBJECT ORIENTED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 3 3
CPC504 COMPUTER NETWORKS 3 3
CPL501 WEB TECHNOLOGIES LABORATORY 2.8 1.8
CPL502 BUSINESS COMMUNICATION AND ETHICS 3 3
CPC601 SYSTEM PROGRAMMING AND COMPILER CONSTRUCTION 2.9 2.9
CPC602 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING -- 3
CPC603 DISTRIBUTED DATABASES 2 2
CPC604 MOBILE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTING 3 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.

CPE6011 SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT -- 3


CPL601 NETWORK PROGRAMMING LABORATORY 2.8 2.7
CPC701 DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESING 3 --
CPC702 CRYPTOGRAPHY AND SYSTEM SECURITY 2.2 2.2
CPC703 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 2.1 2.1
CPE70425 SOFT COMPUTING 3 3
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING & SUPPLY CHAIN
CPE70426 3 3
MANAGEMENT
CPP701 PROJECT I 2.7 2.7
CPL701 NETWORK THREATS AND ATTACKS LABORATORY 2.8 2.8
CPC801 DATA WAREHOUSE AND MINING 2.9 3
CPC802 HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION 3 3
CPC803 PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS 2.2 2.2
CPE8031 MACHINE LEARNING 2.2 2.3
CPE8035 BIG DATA ANALYTICS 2.2 2.2
CPP802 PROJECT II 2.7 2.7
CPL801 CLOUD COMPUTING LABORATORY 3 3
Average 2.7 2.7

You might also like