Attainment of PO, PSO and CO: Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai
Attainment of PO, PSO and CO: Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai
Attainment of PO, PSO and CO: Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai
In the Outcome Based Education (OBE), assessment is done through one or more than one
processes, carried out by the department, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate
the achievement of course outcomes (CO’s).
The process for finding the attainment of Course outcomes uses various tools/methods.
These methods are classified into two types: Direct methods and indirect methods.
Direct methods display the student’s knowledge and skills from their performance in
the class/assignment test, internal assessment tests, assignments, semester examinations,
seminars, laboratory assignments/practicals, mini projects etc. These methods provide a
sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong evidence of student
learning.
Indirect methods such as course exit survey and examiner feedback to reflect on
student’s learning. They are used to assess opinions or thoughts about the graduate’s
knowledge or skills.
Rubrics are used for both formative and summative assessment of students. Same rubric is
used for assessing an outcome so that the faculty is able to assess student progress and
maintain the record of the same for each student. The rubrics are shared with students before
being evaluated so that they are aware of the performance criteria and their weightage.
Following tables show the various methods used in assessment process that periodically
documents and demonstrates the degree to which the Course Outcomes are attained. They
include information on:
a) Listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data, and
b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out.
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
Direct
Sr. Assessment
Assessment Description
No. frequency
Method
The weightages given for various assessment tools used for the attainment of Course
Outcomes are shown in the following figure 1 and table 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
Internal Twice in a
assessment semester
MOCK Practicals
Once in a
MCQ
semester
Seminar/Present
ations
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
Mini Projects
Preliminary Once in a 20
Examination semester %
End Semester
External
Examination 40%
Once in a
Tools
semester
Course Exit
Survey/
Indirect -- Once in a Semester 20%
Examiners
feedback
Process to set Goal for course (effective from Second Half of 2015)
Course Outcome Attainment level is set based on previous three years’ average performance
levels in the university examination in that course. Process is given below:
1. Find out the average marks scored in each course in the last three years.
2. Find the number of students scoring above the average marks
3. This is set as middle level of goal setting [Level-2]
4. Depending on the trend of the result the lower level [Level-1] can be set by reducing 5% of
the students score than the middle level.
5. The upper level [Level-3] can be set by increasing 5% of the students score than the middle
level.
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
The Set level will be changed if all Course Outcomes of the subject are attained the Level-3.
This change in the goal can be done in two ways, either increase the average marks obtained
by the students or increase the percentage of students securing more than the average marks.
Since we have to bring maximum students to level-3 category, the change of average marks
will set only after 90% students securing more than previous average marks. Once it is
achieved increase the goal set by 2 – 5%
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
Course Outcomes
CO-ID CO-Statement
Design an algorithm to implement stack, queue data structures and apply the
C305.2
concept for an application
Design an algorithm to implement linked list data structures and apply the
C305.3
concept for an application
C305.4 Demonstrate the concept of tree and apply to solve the problems
C305.5 Demonstrate the concept of graph and apply to solve the problems
COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
CSC305.1 3 2 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 1
CSC305.2 2 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2
CSC305.3 2 2 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2
CSC305.4 3 -- 2 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 1
CSC305.5 3 -- 2 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 1
CSC305.6 2 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2
Average 3 3 3 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 2
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
i. Internal Assessment-1
Q. Marks CO
No
Answer any five
a Exemplify linear and non-linear Data structures 2
b. Demonstrate Circular and Priority Queue. 2
1
c.. State the difference between Singly Linked List and 2 (CO-1)
DoublyADT
d Define Linked
forList
Stack. List applications of Stack 2
e. List out the areas in which data structures are applied 2
f.. Exemplify
extensivelyinfix, postfix and prefix expression. 2
Answer any one
a Write a program to implement a creation of a singly
. linked
i) list and perform
Inserting a nodefollowing
at the endoperations
2 ii) Delete a node last node 5 (CO-3)
b Write a program to implement creation of a doubly
. linked
i) list and perform
Inserting a nodefollowing operations
after a specific node
ii) Delete a node after a specific node
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
Q. Mark CO
No s
Answer any five
a Exemplify threaded binary tree. 2
1 b. Draw Expression tree for infix expression (a+b)*(c-d)/f 2
c. Explain concept of Binary Search Tree with example 2 (CO-
d. Compare B tree with B+ tree 2 4)
e. Exemplify Splay tree . 2
f. Exemplify trie data structure 2
Answer
. any one
(CO-
2 a Exemplify different ways to represent graph . 5
5)
b. Write the function for BFS Traversal of a graph. Explain its
working with an example
Answer any one
a Apply the Huffman coding for the word MALAYALAM. Give
(CO-
3 the Huffman code for each symbol 5
4)
b Insert the following elements in AVL tree
. 44,17,32,78,50,88,48,62,54
Q. No Set-A Marks CO
1 Exemplify Different types of data structure . 5
CO-1
2 Illustrate applications of stack and queue 5
3 Write a program for circular queue using array 10 CO-2
Q. No Set-B Marks CO
Q. No Set-A Marks CO
Questions Mark CO
Q.1 a. Exemplify Linear and Non-linear data structures . 5 CO1
State the difference between Singly linked list and Doubly linked 5
Q.1 b. CO3
list along with their application
Q.1 c. Write a C program for Insertion Sort 7 CO6
Q.1 d. Define ADT with an example 3 CO1
Construct Huffman Tree and determine the code for following
Q. 2 a. 10 CO4
characters of word “DATASTRUCTURES”
Q. 2 b. Write a C program for Postfix Evaluation 10 CO2
Q. 3 a. Write a C program in C to implement a priority queue. 10 CO3
Sort the elements using Radix Sort 121, 70, 965, 12,577,683.
Q. 3 b. 10 CO6
What are the limitations of radix sort
Write a C program to create "Circular Linked List" ADT. The
ADT should support the Following operations
Q. 4 a. 10 CO3
i) Creating a Circular Linked List
ii) Inserting a node after a specific node
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
CO-Tool Marks
Common
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6
Tools
Roll No Name of Student
PRELIM
ASS-1
MCQ
AT-1
AT-1
AT-2
AT-2
CT-2
ESE
IA-1
IA-1
IA-1
IA-2
IA-2
Maximum Marks 10 10 10 5 10 5 20 10 5 5 15 5 80 80
Rating Percentage
No of students rated
CO- Course Outcome Average CO-Question
QUE Question '5' % '4' % '3' % '2' % '1' % % Attainment
Goal Set
53% 60% 1
53% 65% 2
53% 70% 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
External
Internal Assessment
Assessment
Indirect
Direct Assessment Assessm
ent Final
Int. Int. Ext
CO- Ext Attain
Course Outcome Attain Attain Attainm
ID Course Attainm ment
Tool1 Tool2 Prelim ment ment ent
Exit ent % Level
% Level Level
80% 20% Survey
80% 20%
60% 40%
Demonstrate the AT-1 IA-1
C305. concept of linear,
85% 78% 68.58 2 83.08% 3 2.4
1 nonlinear data
29.23% 93.85%
structure
Design an algorithm
to implement stack, AT-1 IA-1
C305. queue data
85% 75% 61.1 1 83.08% 3 1.8
2 structures and
apply the concept 38.46% 63.08%
for an application
Design an algorithm
AT-1 IA-1
to implement
C305. linked list data
85% 70% 80.28 3 83.08% 3 3
3 structures and
apply the concept 86.15% 78.46%
for an application
Demonstrate the
C305. concept of tree and
CT-1 IA-2
85% 71% 71.12 3 83.08% 3 3
4 apply to solve the
problems 35.38% 100%
Demonstrate the
C305. concept of graph
AT-2 IA-2
85% 71% 77.03 3 83.08% 3 3
5 and apply to solve
the problems 64.62% 89.23%
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
COs
Assessment tools are categorized into Direct and Indirect methods to assess the program
outcomes. 80% weightage is given to direct methods and 20% to indirect methods.
Direct methods display the students’ knowledge and skills from their performance in
the various academic activities like Internal Assessment Exams, End–Semester Examinations,
Assignment/Class Tests, Presentations, and Home Assignments, Quizzes, Practicals etc. These
methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong
evidence of student learning. Average of CO-PO attainment of all the courses is considered as
direct method assessment tool for PO attainment.
Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews of the stakeholders to reflect on
student’s learning. They assess opinions or thoughts about the graduates’ knowledge
or skills valued by different stakeholders. The various indirect tools are:
Program Exit Survey
Surveys conducted on Co-curricular and Extra-curricular activities (PO6 and PO7).
The average of PO attainment of all surveys is considered for calculating the PO attainment.
the following figure 1 shows the various methods/tools used for calculating the PO attainment
along with weightage given to each method.
The Programme outcomes are difficult to measure such as assessing critical thinking,
creativity, analytical skills, and problem solving etc. Hence the department has adopted
Criterion Referenced Rubrics to assess the POs. The Rubric criteria are developed by
department faculty and distributed to students before being evaluated so that they are aware
of the performance criteria and their weightage.
The methods/tools used for the assessment process that periodically documents and
demonstrates the degree to which the Programme Outcomes are attained are shown below
including the information on:
a) Listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data, and
b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out.
Direct
Sr. Assessment
Assessment Description
No. frequency
Method
The attainment of Course outcomes of every course is directly mapped to Program Specific
Outcomes.
FEC206 CS -- -- -- -- 3 3 -- -- 3 3 3 3 -- --
CSC301 AM -III 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 --
CSC302 DLDA 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CSC303 DIS 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 --
CSC304 ECCF 2.6 2.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.6 -- -- -- 2.6
CSC305 DS 2.6 2.7 2.4 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 2.7 2.7
CSL301 DSL 2.7 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 2.8 3
CSL302 BEL 1.6 1.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.6
CSL303 DSL 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
CSL304 OOPL 2.5 2.6 2.6 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.4 2.6 2.6
CSC401 AM-IV 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 --
CSC402 AOA 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 -- --
CSC403 COA 1.2 1.4 1 -- 1.4 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- --
CSC404 CG 3 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CSC405 OS 1 1 1 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 1
CSL401 AOAL -- 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3 3
CSL402 CGL 3 3 3 3 3 -- -- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
CSL403 PAL 1 1 1 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 --
CSL404 OSL 1 1 1 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 1
CSL405 OSTL 1.5 -- 1.5 1.5 1.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.5 1.5 1.5
CPC501 MP 1.6 1.6 1.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- 1.6
CPC502 OS 2.4 2.4 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.3 2.4 2.6
CPC503 SOOAD 3 3 3 3 -- -- -- 3 -- -- 3 3 3 3
CPC504 CN 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CPL501 WTL 3 3 3 3 3 -- -- 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.8 1.8
CPL502 BCE -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
CPC601 SPCC 2.9 3 2.9 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.8 2.9 2.9
CPC602 SE 2.2 2.2 1.6 1 1.8 1.6 -- 2.2 1.8 -- 1.6 2.2 -- 2
CPC603 DD 2.2 1.6 2.2 -- -- -- -- 1 -- -- 1.8 2.2 2 2
CPC604 MCC 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CPE6011 SPM 2.2 -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- 2.2
CPL601 NPL -- 1 1 -- 1 -- -- 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1
CPC701 DSP 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
CPC702 CSS 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2
CPC703 AI 1 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.2 1 1.6 -- -- -- -- 1.2 1.3 1.3
CPE70425 SC 3 3 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3
CPE70426 ERP 3 3 3 3 3 -- -- -- -- 3 -- 3 3 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
PROJEC
CPP701 -- 2.9 -- 2.9 2.9 2.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.9 2.9
TI
CPL701 NTAL -- 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.8 -- -- 2.8 2.8 2.8 -- 2.8 -- --
CPC801 DWDM 2 1.6 1.6 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 -- --
CPC802 HMI 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2
CPC803 PDS 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
CPE8031 ML 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.1 1.1 1.2
CPE8035 BDA 2.2 2.2 2.2 -- 2.2 -- -- -- 2.2 -- -- 2.2 2.2 2.2
PROJEC
CPP802 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
T II
CPL801 CCL 1.6 1.7 1.6 -- 1.5 1 -- -- 1 1 1 1.4 -- --
Direct Attainment
2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.3
(80%)
Progra
m Exit
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 -- --
Survey
(50%)
Indirect
Extra
Attainme
Curricu
nt (20%)
lar
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 3 3 3 -- --
Actviti
es
(50%)
2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.4
Average Attainment 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.3
2 2 4 6 6 8 6 2 2 4
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.
Subject
Subject Name PSO1 PSO2
Code
FEC101 APPLIED MATHEMATICS-I 3 --
FEC102 APPLIED PHYSICS-I 3 --
FEC103 APPLIED CHEMISTRY -I 3 --
FEC104 ENGINEERING MECHANICS 3 --
FEC105 BASIC ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2.5 --
FEC106 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES 3 --
FEC201 APPLIED MATHEMATICS-II 2.9 --
FEC202 APPLIED PHYSICS-II 3 --
FEC203 APPLIED CHEMISTRY-II 2.8 --
FEC204 ENGINEERING DRAWING 3 --
FEC205 STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING APPROACH 3 3
FEC206 COMMUNICATION SKILLS -- 3
CSC301 APPLIED MATHEMATICS -III 3 --
CSC302 DIGITAL LOGIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS 3 3
CSC303 DISCRETE STRUCTURES 3 --
ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS AND COMMUNICATION
CSC304 -- 2.6
FUNDAMENTALS
CSC305 DATA STRUCTURES 2.7 2.7
CSL301 DIGITAL SYSTEM LAB 3 3
CSL302 BASIC ELECTRONICS LAB -- 2.2
CSL303 DATA STRUCTURE LAB 2.2 2.2
CSL304 OOPM(JAVA) LAB - 2.6 2.6
CSC401 APPLIED MATHEMATICS-IV 2.2 --
CSC402 ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS 3 3
CSC403 COMPUTER ORGANIZATION AND ARCHITECTURE 2 --
CSC404 COMPUTER GRAPHICS 3 3
CSC405 OPERATING SYSTEM 1.8 1.8
CSL401 ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMS LAB 3 3
CSL402 COMPUTER GRAPHICS LAB 3 3
CSL403 PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE LAB 2.6 --
CSL404 OPERATING SYSTEM LAB 2.6 2.6
CSL405 OPEN SOURCE TECH(PYTHON & PERL) LAB 2.2 2.2
CPC501 MICROPROCESSOR -- 1.6
CPC502 OPERATING SYSTEMS 2.4 2.6
CPC503 STRUCTURED AND OBJECT ORIENTED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 3 3
CPC504 COMPUTER NETWORKS 3 3
CPL501 WEB TECHNOLOGIES LABORATORY 2.8 1.8
CPL502 BUSINESS COMMUNICATION AND ETHICS 3 3
CPC601 SYSTEM PROGRAMMING AND COMPILER CONSTRUCTION 2.9 2.9
CPC602 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING -- 3
CPC603 DISTRIBUTED DATABASES 2 2
CPC604 MOBILE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTING 3 3
Agnel Charities’
Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Vashi, Navi Mumbai.