Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    Task 2 - Writing Practices

    Uploaded by

    Victisto Eliover
    The document argues that governments should invest more in roads than railways because roads play a more significant role in people's daily lives today since most people prefer to travel by car rather than train. Investing more in roads could have positive multi-disciplinary effects and allow for development of other infrastructure and businesses since roads can serve as space for other construction, unlike railways which permanently occupy dedicated space.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Task 2 - Writing Practices

    Uploaded by

    Victisto Eliover
    25 views2 pages
    The document argues that governments should invest more in roads than railways because roads play a more significant role in people's daily lives today since most people prefer to travel by car rather than train. Investing more in roads could have positive multi-disciplinary effects and allow for development of other infrastructure and businesses since roads can serve as space for other construction, unlike railways which permanently occupy dedicated space.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document argues that governments should invest more in roads than railways because roads play a more significant role in people's daily lives today since most people prefer to travel by car rather than train. Investing more in roads could have positive multi-disciplinary effects and allow for development of other infrastructure and businesses since roads can serve as space for other construction, unlike railways which permanently occupy dedicated space.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    25 views2 pages

    Task 2 - Writing Practices

    Uploaded by

    Victisto Eliover
    The document argues that governments should invest more in roads than railways because roads play a more significant role in people's daily lives today since most people prefer to travel by car rather than train. Investing more in roads could have positive multi-disciplinary effects and allow for development of other infrastructure and businesses since roads can serve as space for other construction, unlike railways which permanently occupy dedicated space.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    People usually argue that governments should invest in railways instead of roads.

    I generally

    disagree with them, given that I think roads have a more significant role in today’s people’s life.

    On the one hand, road obviously has more spatial presence than railways not only in the urban

    area, but also in the countryside. It is due to the larger utility that road dedicates to the quotidian

    life of modern people in comparison with its counterpart. There is an evident fact deserving a

    better recognition of the government, in case they plan to preferentially spends money on

    railways, that people nowadays opt a self-drive using motors and cars, not a train costing them

    hours to travel. If there comes any intention of the leaders suggesting an exclusive development

    for the railway system, should they also take into consideration a battery of conflicts argued

    between their acts and the population’s expectations of an efficient aid to enhancing their

    mobility routines.

    On the other hand, if railways (trains) gain more budgetary advantages than roads (motors, cars,

    etc.) in the strategies of developing national traffic infrastructure, there will arise questions

    relating to their sustainable developmental practicability compared with the other. The former,

    say, requires a supplementary bar line system for mobility, while the latter is by contrast free of

    an extra-equipped moving network. One suggestion is that money invested in elaborating the

    road reserve (on land) can have multidisciplinary effects, mostly in a positive manner. Trains

    being developed to a larger extent leave indeed unexpectedly more bar lines on the cadastral area

    that occupy permanently the whole space used for their building, yet roads on which other
    independent vehicles run can serve literally as vacancies for other infrastructure construction,

    housing, business establishment, etc. It is then plausible, say, that the development of road

    network shares mutual benefits with other business sectors, meaning as a whole an

    interdependent progress.

    In conclusion, it will be better to invest in roads rather than railways in consideration of its

    potential to bring larger advantages for other business areas. Once the government launches this

    strategy, there will be accordingly more routes with high quality in use for the population, and

    furthermore more development opportunities for all entities integrated in the national economy.

    You might also like