Wiener Filter
Wiener Filter
Wiener Filter
The inverse filtering approach makes no explicit provision for handling noise. The Wiener filtering
approach incorporates both the degradation function and statistical characteristics of noise into the
restoration process. The method is founded on considering images and noise as random variables,
and the objective is to find an estimate of the uncorrupted image f such that the mean square error
𝑒 2 = E{(𝑓 − 𝑓 ^ )2 } ……………………………(1)
where E{●}is the expected value of the argument. It is assumed that the noise and the image are
uncorrelated; that one or the other has zero mean; and that the intensity levels in the estimate are
a linear function of the levels in the degraded image. Based on these conditions, the minimum of
the error function in Eq. (1) is given in the frequency domain by the expression
…………..(2)
where we used the fact that the product of a complex quantity with its conjugate is equal to the
magnitude of the complex quantity squared. This result is known as the Wiener filter, after
N.Wiener [1942], who first proposed the concept in the year shown. The filter, which consists of
the terms inside the brackets, also is commonly referred to as the minimum mean square error filter
Note from the first line in Eq. (2) that the Wiener filter does not have the same problem as the
inverse filter with zeros in the degradation function, unless the entire denominator is zero for the
As before, H(u,v) is the transform of the degradation function and G(u, v) is the transform of the
degraded image. The restored image in the spatial domain is given by the inverse Fourier transform
of the frequency-domain estimate 𝐹 ^ (𝑢, 𝑣). If the noise is zero, then the noise power spectrum
A number of useful measures are based on the power spectra of noise and of the undegraded
image. One of the most important is the signal-to-noise ratio, approximated using frequency
This ratio gives a measure of the level of information bearing signal power (i.e., of the original,
undegraded image) to the level of noise power. Images with low noise tend to have a high SNR
and, conversely, the same image with a higher level of noise has a lower SNR. This ratio by itself
restoration algorithms.
The mean square error given in statistical form in Eq. (1) can be approximated also in terms
In fact, if one considers the restored image to be “signal” and the difference between this image
and the original to be noise, we can define a signal-to-noise ratio in the spatial domain as
The closer f and 𝑓 ^ are, the larger this ratio will be. Sometimes the square root of these measures
is used instead, in which case they are referred to as the root-mean-square-signal-to-noise ratio and
When we are dealing with spectrally white noise, the spectrum |𝑁(𝑢, 𝑣)|2 is a constant,
which simplifies things considerably. However, the power spectrum of the undegraded image
seldom is known. An approach used frequently when these quantities are not known or cannot be
……………….(3)