Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 103 views

    Rubrics For A Scientific Investigation Project

    Uploaded by

    Alyssa Mae Dapadap
    This document contains rubrics for evaluating science projects and scientific essays. The science project rubric assesses projects on knowledge, application, and communication. It provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, satisfactory, fair, and needs improvement evaluations in these areas. The scientific essay rubric evaluates essays on format/layout, content/information, and quality of writing. It also uses descriptors to differentiate between poor, good, and excellent essays based on these criteria. Both rubrics provide detailed guidelines and expectations for evaluating student work in science.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubrics For A Scientific Investigation Project

    Uploaded by

    Alyssa Mae Dapadap
    103 views4 pages
    This document contains rubrics for evaluating science projects and scientific essays. The science project rubric assesses projects on knowledge, application, and communication. It provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, satisfactory, fair, and needs improvement evaluations in these areas. The scientific essay rubric evaluates essays on format/layout, content/information, and quality of writing. It also uses descriptors to differentiate between poor, good, and excellent essays based on these criteria. Both rubrics provide detailed guidelines and expectations for evaluating student work in science.

    Original Title

    70515484 Rubrics for a Scientific Investigation Project

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains rubrics for evaluating science projects and scientific essays. The science project rubric assesses projects on knowledge, application, and communication. It provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, satisfactory, fair, and needs improvement evaluations in these areas. The scientific essay rubric evaluates essays on format/layout, content/information, and quality of writing. It also uses descriptors to differentiate between poor, good, and excellent essays based on these criteria. Both rubrics provide detailed guidelines and expectations for evaluating student work in science.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    103 views4 pages

    Rubrics For A Scientific Investigation Project

    Uploaded by

    Alyssa Mae Dapadap
    This document contains rubrics for evaluating science projects and scientific essays. The science project rubric assesses projects on knowledge, application, and communication. It provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, satisfactory, fair, and needs improvement evaluations in these areas. The scientific essay rubric evaluates essays on format/layout, content/information, and quality of writing. It also uses descriptors to differentiate between poor, good, and excellent essays based on these criteria. Both rubrics provide detailed guidelines and expectations for evaluating student work in science.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Rubrics for a Scientific Investigation Project

    Parts of the Excellent Satisfactory Fair Needs


    Projects (40 points) (30 points) (20 points) Improvement
    (10 points)
    Problem Specific General Not clear Not given
    Hypothesis Association between Problem is stated Hypothesis not No hypothesis
    the problem and the but predicted result stated directly
    predicted result is is not
    directs (shows it …
    then relationship)
    Design Thorough and Lacks minor details Missing major Not applicable to
    appropriate to the design components the problem
    problem

    List of materials List or materials List of materials


    complete complete incomplete

    Control and Control and Only experimental The design is wrong


    experimental set-ups experimental set- set-up given; no and does not help
    are identified ups are identified control set-up answer the problem

    Dependent and Dependent variable Both dependent and Procedure difficult


    independent variables identified but not independent to follow
    clear; with logical the independent variables are not
    procedure and can be variable; procedure identified
    replicated is not described in
    detail
    Date collection All significant data Date collection Inadequate date Data collected not
    and analysis collected, measures complete collected useful
    and recorded

    Gives accurate tables Tables presented Raw data presented No tables nor
    and charts but no charts but no tables nor graphs
    graphs

    Analysis in agreement Analysis of data Analysis of data is Analysis is wrong


    with the data inadequate but does inadequate and
    collected not affect the affect the accuracy
    accuracy
    Results explained Some explanations
    clearly Results interlinked are inaccurate Explanation is
    wrong
    Conclusion Acceptance or Relates to the Conclusion not very Conclusion does not
    rejection of hypothesis but clear; too general answer the problem
    hypothesis supported conclusion is just
    with evidence implied
    Randy P. Cayat
    Rubrics for a Scientific Essay
    Qualities & Criteria Poor (0-80) Good (80-90) Excellent (90-100)
    Format/Layout Follows poorly the Follows, for the most Closely follows all the
     Presentation of the requirements related to part, all the requirements requirements related to
    text format and layout. related to format and format and layout
     Structuring of text layout. Some
     Follows require- requirements are not
    ments of length, font followed
    and style
    (Weight 15%)

    Content/Information The essay is not objective The essay is objective and The essay is objective and
     All elements of the and addresses poorly the for the most part addresses with an in
    topics are addressed issues referred in the addresses with an in depth analysis all the
     The information is proposed topic. The depth analysis most of issues referred in the
    technically sound provided information is the issues referred in the proposed topic. The
     Information based on not necessary or not proposed topic. The provided information is
    careful research sufficient to discuss these provided information is, necessary and sufficient
     Coherence of issues. for the most part, to discuss these issues.
    information necessary and sufficient
    (Weight 60%) to discuss these issues.
    Quality of Writing The essay is not well The essay is well written The essay is well written
     Clarity of sentences written, and contains for the most part, from start to finish,
    and paragraphs many spelling errors, without spelling, without spelling,
     No errors and and/or grammar errors grammar or use of grammar or use of English
    spelling, grammar and and/or use of English English errors. The essay errors. The essay is well
    use of English errors. The essay is badly is for the most part well organized, clear and
     Organization and organized, lacks clarity organized, clear and presents ideas in a
    coherence of ideas and/or does not present presents ideas in a coherent way.
    (Weight 25%) ideas in a coherent way. coherent way.
    Randy P. Cayat

    Rubrics for Science Projects


    KNOWLEDGE APPLICATION COMMUNICATION
    Knows and understands Applies scientific Communicates
    scientific terms, facts, knowledge, skills scientific
    concepts, principles, and methods to knowledge and
    theories and methods manipulate, applications
    analyze, through writing,
    synthesize, create speech, and visual
    and evaluate displays
    Excellent (90-100) Descriptions of Applications are Written, oral and/or
    scientific terms, thorough, appropriate, visual
    facts, concepts, and accurate.
    principles, theories
    and methods are
    complete and
    correct.

    Satisfactory (80-89) Descriptions Applications are mostly Most of the written, oral
    of scientific . thorough, appropriate, and/or visual
    terms, facts, and accurate communication is well-
    concepts, organized and effective.
    principles,
    theories
    and
    methods
    are mostly
    complete
    and correct.

    Fair (70-79) Descriptions of Applications are Some of the written, oral


    scientific terms, somewhat, appropriate, and/or visual
    facts, concepts, and accurate. communication is
    principles, theories organized and effective.
    and methods are
    somewhat
    complete and
    correct.

    Needs All descriptions of All applications are All of the written, oral or
    Improvement scientific terms, missing and/or incorrect. visual communication is
    (69 and below) facts, concepts, missing and/or lacks
    principles, theories organization.
    and methods are
    missing and/or
    incorrect.

    Randy P. Cayat
    THE EFFECT OF THE DIFFERENT RATES OF
    MADRE DE CACAO LEAVES ON THE
    RIPENING BANANA

    AN INVESTIGATORY PROJECT

    Randy P. Cayat

    You might also like