Closing Anterior Open Bites - The Extrusion Arch
Closing Anterior Open Bites - The Extrusion Arch
Closing Anterior Open Bites - The Extrusion Arch
term, extrusion arch, is probably somewhat mis- won by the patient. The extrusion arch, how-
leading because the action of the wire is not to ever, gives the orthodontist the ability to close
extrude the tooth from its attachment appara- anterior o p e n bites without patient compliance,
tus. and in addition, to decide whether the open bite
What does h a p p e n when a tooth is moved closure should come fi~om just the maxillary
vertically within the alveolar process? w h e n the teeth moving down, just the mandibular teeth
o p e n bite closes, does the tooth move with re- moving up, or both.
spect to the alveolar process and leave the alve- The biomechanics of an extrusion arch are
olar process b e h i n d with a longer clinical crown fairly straightforward. As with most clinical prob-
resulting? All available evidence shows that, lems, the first question is, Which teeth do I want
whether the tooth is intruded or extruded, ver- to move in what direction? With an anterior
tical m o v e m e n t brings the entire attachment ap- open bite the answer is clear. I want the front
paratus, including the alveolar process and the teeth to move vertically together. Now, however,
gingival tissues, with the tooth. In fact, some the question is more sophisticated: Do I want the
work has even been reported describing treat- u p p e r teeth, the lower teeth, or both to move
m e n t procedures to try to prevent the attach- vertically?
ment from the normal process of following the Sometimes the anterior open bite is primarily
vertical m o v e m e n t of a tooth in those cases a skeletal growth problem. 4 The disproportion-
where a treatment requires a longer clinical ate bony facial growth results from relatively
crown. 1 more vertical growth at the alveolar process as
The extrusion arch is a new adaptation of the c o m p a r e d with the vertical growth occurring at
biomechanical principle of an off-center bend, the ramus (Fig 1). This is a long-face problem
or asymmetrical V, in an arch wire to develop a evolving and, in the most troublesome situa-
specific set of biomechanical responses. 9 Despite tions, a backward rotating facial growth pattern.
the fact that many systems have used the princi- in these individuals, the anterior alveolar pro-
ples of an intrusion arch to treat deep bites for cess must grow vertically rapidly or the open bite
many decades, the concept of using the reverse will get worse. If the clinical open bite extends
configuration of the wire to treat anterior o p e n from molar to molar, the problem is likely to be
bites was only recently reported, a a skeletal problem with insufficient dental com-
The principle of an extrusion arch has been pensations and is even more difficult to treat.
applied as a segmental wire for some time, pre- If the o p e n bite is a local problem, and just
dominantly to bring in impacted canines. ~ The involves an anterior segment of teeth, the prog-
application of this principle with a continuous nosis is m u c h better. This is especially true if a
auxiliary arch wire to multitooth anterior o p e n cephalometric analysis shows a skeletal pattern
bites emerged when teaching new residents the with relatively normal vertical development.
principles involved in the use of intrusion Sometimes the local causative factor, eg, a digit,
arches. W h e n a new resident described the in- is no longer present, but the tongue, lips, and
trusion arch backward, the obvious application t r a c t i o n are maintaining the dental o p e n bite.
to an o p e n bite became apparent. When the This kind of open bite will be relatively indepen-
authors applied this theory clinically and used dent of vertical facial growth. O f course, the
an upside down intrusion arch in an open-bite possibility of a skeletal open bite existing in com-
patient who was not willing to wear vertical elas- bination with local factors adapted to the open
tics, the open bite closed in a matter of several bite is quite possible.
weeks. This was indeed a very impressive new When an open bite problem is addressed by
application of an old principle. inserting a continuous arch wire into the brack-
The extrusion arch is a very efficient and ets on all the teeth, the results are rarely satis-
effective way to close anterior open bites, and factory. Wiping reverse occlusal curve in the
open bites are the nemesis of most mechanics. maxillary wire a n d / o r a large accentuated curve
The vertical elastic has been the most c o m m o n l y in the lower wire simply is not effective. The
used tool in the past and, too often, vertical mechanics are slow to work, and the side effects
elastics became a contest of wills between the are often undesirable. W h e n the wire is left in
orthodontist and the p a t i e n t - - a contest often place long enough, the result is often essentially
36 Aaacson and Lindauer
!
..... z , J
) ', :?}
,::~ •
I
egJoOOQ° J
Figure 2. Schematic view of the biomechanics of an Figure 3. Same as Figure 2, but showing the equilib-
extrusion arch. Elevation of the anterior portion of rium forces (arrows in bold) and the second-order
the wire creates a second-order couple at the molar couple at the molar (shaded arrows). The compo-
bracket, resulting in crown mesial/root distal rotation nents of the equilibrium shown and the second-order
around the center of resistance (arrows in bold). The couple in Figure 2 are inseparably related, and chang-
equilibrium of this couple is another couple com- ing the magnitude or location of either one of them
posed of the extrusive force at the incisor and an will affect the other.
intrusive force at the molar (shaded arrows).
Figure 5. A segment of steel wire in the brackets of Figure 6. A segment of steel wire placed in the inci-
the posterior teeth to stabilize the molar and resist the sors to extrude the incisors as one big tooth. They will
mesial crown rotation resulting from the second-or- maintain their relationship to each other, but will
der couple. For the rotational forces to manifest, they change bracket heights relative to the remainder of
would have to rotate the entire segment of teeth, the arch as the extrusion arch works.
which would tend toward a lateral open bite. An
advantage of the segmented approach is that the an-
terior teeth are free to move while the posterior teeth
are stabilized. The disadvantage is that the bracket
heights between the anterior and posterior segments
tend to get malaligned as the open bite is closed. For
this reason it is preferable to use extrusion arches just
before appliance removal. Insertion of a straight arch
wire after bracket heights are malaligned with an
extrusion arch will likely result in recreating the an-
terior open bite just closed.
Figure 8. Adult male patient with a chief complaint of a midline diastema (A). When told of the potential for
open bite closure without surgery, he consented to treatment (B). Anterior and posterior teeth treated as
segments, and extrusion aches begun in both upper and lower arches. Note the mesial molar crown tip because
of the second-order couple. Note also the intrusion and buccal tip of the molar resulting from the force acting
at the bracket lateral to the molar center of resistance (B). Open bite closure after 2 months of extrusion arch
mechanics (C). Vertical elastics have been worn in the buccal segments to resist and correct the molar tendency
to tip to the mesial. The incisors were rebracketed at a more gingival position to allow insertion of a straight arch
wire (C). Result 17 mouths after appliance removal (D). Retention used employed routine removable appli-
ances. Patient has had prosthetic restoration of anterior teeth for esthetic purposes, and the result continues to
be stable. Note molar position is the same as it was prior to treatment.
readily, b u t will move the incisor brackets to dif- force is tied at the c e n t r a l incisors, it is p r o b a b l y
ferent heights t h a n the rest of the teeth i n the a c t i n g a n t e r i o r to the c e n t e r o f resistance (Fig
arch. If the exwusion arch is tied to a c o n t i n u o u s 7). Such a force, i n a d d i t i o n to t r a n s l a t i n g the
nickel t i t a n i u m wire, the bracket heights are better incisors vertically, will act a n t e r i o r to the inci-
m a i n t a i n e d with respect to each other. T h e speed sors' c e n t e r of resistance. Clinically, the incisors
of extrusion may be somewhat slowed down, b u t will t e n d to tip l i n g u a l l y a n d u p r i g h t , t h e r e b y
the extrusion is kept u n d e r better control in terms r e d u c i n g arch p e r i m e t e r . T h e best m e t h o d to
of overtreatment. If the extrusion arch wire is avoid the latter is to try to apply the force m o r e
placed into the incisor brackets, it m u s t be able to posteriorly by tying the e x t r u s i o n arch at the
be seated, a n d t h e n it will move the incisors as o n e lateral incisors.
big tooth. This latter configuration is really a 2-cou-
ple system, a n d the third-order torque at the inci-
The Wire
sors i n f l u e n c e s the forces of extrusion. This makes
it a m o r e c o m p l e x system without any special ad- T h e m a g n i t u d e of the extrusive force u s e d is
vantages. It is analogous to the relationship be- a r o u n d 100 g for 4 incisors. This is easily
tween a 1-couple i n t r u s i o n arch (the reverse of the a c h i e v e d with a 90 ° b e n d i n a 0.016 X O.022-inch
extrusion arch) a n d the c o m m o n l y used utility stainless steel a r c h wire with a helix at the molar.
arch. More c o m m o n l y use is m a d e o f the same size of
A p p l i c a t i o n of a n y e x t r u s i o n force to a n t e r i o r t i t a n i u m m o l y b d e n m n alloy (TMA) wire w i t h o u t
t e e t h is effective j u s t as the a p p l i c a t i o n of a a helix. This is m o r e c o m f o r t a b l e for the p a t i e n t
single force is effective a n y w h e r e else. If the a n d is easy to insert. T h e u s u a l care m u s t be
(;losing Anterior Open Bites 41
Figure 9. Adult female patient showing the occlusal pattern of dental compensation for a skeletal open bite
(date 2/93) (A). Following appliance placement, the dental open bite became more manifest (date 6/93) (B).
Extusion arches were placed at this time in the upper and lower arches (date 6/93) (B). After 1 month of
extrusion arch mechanics, also having placed a continuous light arch wire beneath the extrusion arches (date
7/93) (C). Following 2 months of extrusion arch mechanics the open bite was closed (date 8/93) (D). Because
a continuous light wire had been placed in the brackets beneath the extrusion arches; the vertical alignment of
the teeth relative to one another was not excessively altered.