CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF

( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Supervised regularly all school
teaching personnel in alternative
teaching observation platforms
(online observation, video lesson Instructional Supervisory Plan (Completed Monthly,stamped received in the Division
observation, demonstration teaching Office on the target date.
via learning action cell)

KRA 1:

INSTRUCTIONA
L LEADERSHIP ● Managed Instructional System
Instructional Supervision Form and /or Clinical observation sheets compiled monthly

Instructional Accomplishment Reports in the form of Individual Teacher

Teaching Performance Record (ITTPR)
Teacher Observed and Given Assistance( TOGA) complied monthly
,stamped received in the Division Office on the Target date.
● Inspected regularly Weekly Home Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's Thinking Log, Activity Sheets (AS),
Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's Teacher's Reflection/Journal or Individual Monitoring Checklist
Thinking Log, Activity Sheets (AS)
and other related pupil's monitoring
tool in the new normal learning
landscape.

● Monitored teachers upkeep of Grading sheet by quarter, summative test result, module distribution/consumption
students records in the new normal checklist
learning landscape
(printed/electronic)

● Ensure safe and effective Monitoring checklist of provision safe and effective environment in accordance to new
environment in accordance to new normal setting certified by the PSDS
KRA 2: normal setting. Child Protection Policy

LEARNING Accomplishment/narrative of feeding Program

ENVIRONMENT
Health Care Package/Health Kits

● Evaluated the school plant, physical School Building Inventory

facilities, safety and sufficiency with DRRM Mobilization Plan
the assistance of specialist Fire Insurance
School Report Card
Classroom Structuring
Updated EBEIS

School Site Development Plan

School Ownership
School Policy Development

● Formulated intervention program to Performance Indicators

determine the strength, weakness, Fire Drill
opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the Eartquake Drill
school in relation to the LDM
School Watching List
Learning Distance Modality
(Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) SMEA Data

Brigada Eskwela
Schoo-Based Management

Brigada Pagbasa/Reading Program

● Organized and conducted School- Teacher's Portfolio-LDM Outputs
KRA 3: based In-Service Training/LAC Report on Training conducted in school
Sessions relevant to the chosen
HUMAN learning delivery modalities (limited
RESOURCE face-to-face/virtual)
MANAGEMENT
 CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF

● Organized and conducted School- ( / or REMARKS /

KRA's OBJECTIVES
based In-Service Training/LAC x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
KRA 3:
Sessions relevant to the chosen a) Memorandum of In-Service Training/SLAC Session
HUMAN learning delivery modalities (limited
b) Training Matrix and Design
RESOURCE face-to-face/virtual)
c) Narrattive Report and Pictures
MANAGEMENT
AND d) Attendance Sheet
DEVELOPMENT
● Assigned teachers where they best SF 7
fit to teach/facilitate/coach/assist Form 201
(grades/learning areas, special DHRIS
assignments)

● Recommended and coordinated List of teachers recommended for promotion with approved ERF
services for the holistic development List of teachers promoted
of school personnel and learners List of teachers sent as trainers, coaches, chaperons or coordinators

● Initiated and compiled teacher's Teacher's Portfolio

professional documents in portfolios DHRIS
List of teachers promoted

● Established linkages with Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

KRA 4: stakeholders during the pandemic MOA
Resolution
PARENT'S Projects Implemented
INVOLVEMENT
Brigada Eskwela
AND
COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIPS

● Met parents regularly physically or Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

online to confer/inform about school Quarterly Conferences
accomplishments Narrative Report
School Annual Accomplishment Report

● Designed programs and projects with BELCP

stakeholders to address school ESIP, AIP,
needs during the pandemic SOB,APP, PPMP
School Development Plan

Accomplishment Report of Projects Implemented

Pictorials
● Recognized accomplishments of Certificate of Appreciation/Recognition
stakeholders Program of Activities
Narrattive Report
Pictorials

● Mediated and ensured resolution of Action Plan

conflicts in school School Policies
Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

● Formulated school policies with School Mediation Committee (Organizational Structure)

stakeholders strategically suited to School Grievance Committee
the local condition/situation DRRM School Contingency Plan
School Case Record
Narrative Report
Pictorials
 ● Formulated school policies with
stakeholders strategically suited to
CHECKLIST
the local condition/situation OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF

( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN

Stakeholders/GPTA Constitution and by Laws

● Divide equally the teaching loads to Class Porgram

KRA 5: all school teaching personnel based Coordinatorships and Clubs
from the excerpts from Basic
SCHOOL Education Learning Continuity Plan
LEADERSHIP, (BELCP) SF 7
MANAGEMENT
AND
● Led and implemented educational DropOut Reduction Program
OPERATIONS
programs aligned in the new normal IPED
education standards Reading Program
Alternative Delivery Mode
GAD

● Performed School Leadership and Request for Cash Advances

Management and Operations Liquidation Reports
Functions in accordance to the new
guidelines set by the Department of
Education DepEd

● Requested and distributed Purchase Request

instructional materials set from the Requisition and Issue Slip
DepEd guidelines in the new normal Logbook
education standards

● Led the preparation/adjustment of Accomplished BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, SOB, PPMP
BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, SOB, Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
PPMP and ensured participation of
stakeholders

● Organized special classes for List of learners with special needs

learners with special needs with strict School Form 1, SF-2, SF-5, SF-6
adherence of IATF standards Learning Modules and Materials
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

● Supervised regularly all school 20 (and above) teachers are 20 (and above) teachers are
teaching personnel in supervised and analyzed result of 20 (and above) teachers were supervised in a month 1-5 days
alternative teaching 5 supervision supervised monthly and were before the schedule as per
observation platforms (online given TA per signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
observation, video lesson
BASIC KRA 1: observation, demonstration 15-19 teachers are supervised 15-19 teachers were supervised 15-19 (and above) teachers are
EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL teaching via learning action 4 and analyzed result of monthly and were given TA per supervised in a month as per
SERVICES LEADERSHIP cell) supervision signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
(40%)
October 2020 10-14 teachers are supervised 10-14 teachers were supervised 10-14 teachers are supervised in
10% 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.4
to June 2021 3 with out analysing the supervision monthly and were given TA per a month as per approved
result signed TA forms supervisory plan

6-9 teachers are supervised with 6-9 teachers were supervised 6-9 teachers are supervised in a
2 out analysing supervision result monthly and were given TA per month as per approved
signed TA forms supervisory plan

4 (and below) teachers are 4 and below teachers were 4 teachers and below are
1 supervised with out analysing supervised monthly and were supervised in a month as per
supervision result given TA per signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
● Managed Instructional System 100% of the instructional 105% and above of the Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were supervisory plans were supervisory plan and
5 implemented/achieved as implemented in a month accomplishment report before the
planned deadline
85-99% of the instructional 100% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
4 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report on the
planned deadline
70-84% of the instructional 85-99% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
October 2020 3 implemented/achieved as
10% accomplishment report 1 day 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.4
to June 2021
planned after the deadline
55-69% of the instructional 70-84% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
2 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 2 days
planned after the deadline

54%and below of the 55-69% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional

instructional supervisory plans were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
1 were implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 3 days
planned after the deadline
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

● Inspected regularly Weekly 100% of the teachers submitted 100% of the DWeekly Home
Home Learning Plan (WHLP), neat and accurate Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's
Learner's Thinking Log, Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's Thinking Log, Activity Sheets
Activity Sheets (AS) and other 5 Thinking Log, Activity Sheets (AS) and other related pupil's
related pupil's monitoring tool in (AS) and other related pupil's monitoring tool in the new normal
the new normal learning monitoring tool in the new normal learning landscape.
landscape. learning landscape.
85-99% of the teachers submitted 100% of the Weekly Home
neat and accurate Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's
Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's Thinking Log, Activity Sheets
Thinking Log, Activity Sheets (AS) and other related pupil's
4 (AS) and other related pupil's monitoring tool in the new normal
monitoring tool in the new normal learning landscape. were
learning landscape. inspected /checked on the
scheduled time/date

70-84% of the teachers submitted 100% of the Weekly Home

neat and accurate Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's
Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's Thinking Log, Activity Sheets
Thinking Log, Activity Sheets (AS) and other related pupil's
(AS) and other related pupil's monitoring tool in the new normal
3 monitoring tool in the new normal learning landscape were
learning landscape. As refelcted inspected /checked one day after
October 2020 in a logbook or monitoring sheet the scheduled time/date
10% 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.5
to June 2021

55-69% of the teachers submitted 100% of the Weekly Home

neat and accurate Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's
Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's Thinking Log, Activity Sheets
Thinking Log, Activity Sheets (AS) and other related pupil's
(AS) and other related pupil's monitoring tool in the new normal
2 monitoring tool in the new normal learning landscape were
learning landscape as reflected in inspected /checked 2days after
a logbook or monitoring sheet the scheduled time/date
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
October 2020
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA 10% Name of Rater: 5 5 VI5
NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO 5.00 5.00 0.5
to June 2021
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

54% and below of the teachers 100% of the Weekly Home

submitted neat and accurate Learning Plan (WHLP), Learner's
Weekly Home Learning Plan Thinking Log, Activity Sheets
(WHLP), Learner's Thinking Log, (AS) and other related pupil's
Activity Sheets (AS) and other monitoring tool in the new normal
1 related pupil's monitoring tool in learning landscape were
the new normal learning inspected /checked 3 days after
landscape as reflected in a the scheduled time/date
logbook or monitoring sheet.

● Monitored teachers upkeep of 100% of the learners records Implemented 5 appropriate

Implemented the appropriate
students records in the new were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed
5 intervention 1 month after having
normal learning landscape for improvement result
the analyzed result
(printed/electronic)
85-99% of the learners records Implemented 4 appropriate Implemented the appropriate
4 were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed intervention 2 month after having
for improvement result the analyzed result
70-84% of the learners records Implemented 3 appropriate
October 2020 were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed Implemented the appropriate
10% 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.467
to June 2021 3
for improvement result intervention 3 month after having
the analyzed result

55-69 % of the learners records Implemented 2 appropriate Implemented the appropriate

2 were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed intervention 4 month after having
for improvement result the analyzed result
54%and below of the learners Implemented 1appropriate Implemented the appropriate
1 records were analyzed and intervention on the anallyzed intervention 5 month after having
utilized result for improvement result the analyzed result
● Ensure safe and effective 90-100% of the new normal 0% Casualty (death case, Covid 90-100% of the new normal
environment in accordance to classrooms were structured/ positive) during the oubreak of classrooms were structured/
new normal setting. equipped with required IATF Covid 19 Pandemic, school equipped with required IATF
health facilities (IEC materilas, events and others through health facilitiesd as supported by
5 foothbath, handwash, alcohol, school-based DRRM pictures 1month before the
temporary barriers (tables, opening of classes
windows, doors)
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: ● Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

Ensure safe and effective
environment in accordance to
new normal setting.
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

KRA 2: 80-89% of the new normal 1-5% Casualty (death case, 80-89% of the new normal
LEARNING classrooms were structured/ Covid positive) during the classrooms were structured/
ENVIRONMENT equipped with required IATF oubreak of Covid 19 Pandemic, equipped with required IATF
health facilities (IEC materilas, school events and others through health facilitiesd as supported by
4
(15%) foothbath, handwash, alcohol, school-based DRRM pictures 1month before the
temporary barriers (tables, opening of classes
windows, doors)

70-79% of the new normal 6-10% Casualty (death case, 70-79% of the new normal
classrooms were structured/ Covid positive) during the classrooms were structured/
equipped with required IATF oubreak of Covid 19 Pandemic, equipped with required IATF
health facilities (IEC materilas, school events and others through health facilitiesd as supported by
April 2019 to 3
5% foothbath, handwash, alcohol, school-based DRRM pictures 1month before the 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.233
March 2020
temporary barriers (tables, opening of classes
windows, doors)

60-69% of the new normal 11-15% Casualty (death case, 60-69% of the new normal
classrooms were structured/ Covid positive) during the classrooms were structured/
equipped with required IATF oubreak of Covid 19 Pandemic, equipped with required IATF
health facilities (IEC materilas, school events and others through health facilitiesd as supported by
2 foothbath, handwash, alcohol, school-based DRRM pictures 1month before the
temporary barriers (tables, opening of classes
windows, doors)

59% and below of the new 16% and above casualty (death 50% and below of the new
normal classrooms were case, Covid positive) during the normal classrooms were
structured/ equipped with oubreak of Covid 19 Pandemic, structured/ equipped with
required IATF health facilities school events and others through required IATF health facilitiesd as
1 (IEC materilas, foothbath, school-based DRRM supported by pictures 1month
handwash, alcohol, temporary before the opening of classes
barriers (tables, windows, doors)

● Evaluated the school plant, Submitted valid,accurate and Conducted a bi- monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical facilities, safety and authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
sufficiency with the assistance 5 and design proposals/ before the deadline supported by
of specialist intervention the transmital

Submitted valid and accurate Conducted a monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical plant inventory and based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
4 design proposals/ intervention on the deadline supported by the
transmital

October 2020
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021
Evaluated the school
● Department plant,
of Education/Misamis Oriental
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: physical facilities, safety and
sufficiency with the assistance
of specialist
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Submitted valid,accurate but not Conducted a quarterly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
October 2020 3 and design proposals/ 1 day after the deadline
5% intervention supported by the transmital 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.25
to June 2021

Submitted not accurate and not Conducted twice a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
2 and without proposals/ 2 days after the deadline
intervention supported by the transmital

Submitted physical plant Conducted once a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
inventory without based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
1 proposal/intervention 3 days after the deadline
supported by the transmital

BASIC ● Formulated intervention Formulated 4 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 4 or Formulated the intervention
EDUCATION program to determine the programs based from the SWOT more interventions programs programs based from the SWOT
SERVICES strength, weakness, of the school in relation to the based on SWOT of the school in of the school in relation to the
opportunities, threats (SWOT) LDM Learning Distance Modality relation to the LDM Learning LDM Learning Distance Modality
of the school in relation to the 5 (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) Distance Modality (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI)
LDM Learning Distance attached (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) attached 1 month after
Modality attached.
(Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI)

Formulated 3 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 3 Formulated the intervention

programs based from the SWOT interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT
of the school in relation to the SWOT of the school in relation to of the school in relation to the
4 LDM Learning Distance Modality the LDM Learning Distance LDM Learning Distance Modality
(Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) Modality (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI)
attached (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) attached 2 months after
attached.

Formulated 2 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 2 Formulated the intervention

programs based from the SWOT interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT
October 2020 of the school in relation to the SWOT of the school in relation to of the school in relation to the
5% LDM Learning Distance Modality the LDM Learning Distance LDM Learning Distance Modality 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.233
to June 2021 3
(Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) Modality (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI)
attached (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) attached 3 months after
attached.
 (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI)

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO2020
October BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
5% 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.233
to June 2021
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Formulated 1 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 1 Formulated the intervention

programs based from the SWOT intervention program based on programs based from the SWOT
of the school in relation to the SWOT of the school in relation to of the school in relation to the
LDM Learning Distance Modality the LDM Learning Distance LDM Learning Distance Modality
2
(Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) Modality (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI)
attached (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) attached 4months after
attached.

Formulated no intervention Formulated and Conducted no Formulated the intervention

programs based from the SWOT intervention program based on programs based from the SWOT
of the school in relation to the SWOT of the school in relation to of the school in relation to the
1 LDM Learning Distance Modality the LDM Learning Distance LDM Learning Distance Modality
(Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) Modality (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI)
attached (Modular/Online/TVBI/RBI) attached 5 months after
attached.
● Organized and conducted Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school
School-based In-Service based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions
Training/LAC Sessions relevant within a year supported with within a year supported with within a year supported with
to the chosen learning delivery training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and
modalities (limited face-to- 5 pictures relevant to the chosen pictures using other funds pictures before INSET Schedule
face/virtual) learning delivery modalities relevant to the chosen learning relevant to the chosen learning
(limited face-to-face/virtual) delivery modalities (limited face- delivery modalities (limited face-
to-face/virtual) to-face/virtual)

KRA 3: Conducted 3 school based Conducted 3 school based Conducted 4 or more school
HUMAN RESOURCE trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
MANAGEMENT AND year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
DEVELOPMENT matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
4 relevant to the chosen learning using other funds relevant to the pictures during October INSET
(15%) delivery modalities (limited face- chosen learning delivery relevant to the chosen learning
to-face/virtual) modalities (limited face-to- delivery modalities (limited face-
face/virtual) to-face/virtual)

Conducted 2 school based Conducted 2 school based Conducted 4 or more school

trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
October 2020 matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
4% 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.187
to June 2021
3 relevant to the chosen learning using other funds relevant to the pictures during summer INSET
delivery modalities (limited face- chosen learning delivery relevant to the chosen learning
to-face/virtual) modalities (limited face-to- delivery modalities (limited face-
face/virtual) to-face/virtual)
 KRA 3:
HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
(15%)
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

October 2020
4% UP DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED 4 5 FILLED
TO BE 5 UP 4.67 4.67 0.187
DURING EVALUATION
to June 2021
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Conducted 1 school based Conducted 1 school based

trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a
year supported with training year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures
2 relevant to the chosen learning using other funds relevant to the
delivery modalities (limited face- chosen learning delivery
to-face/virtual) modalities (limited face-to-
face/virtual)

Organized but Conducted no Conducted no school based

school based trainings/LAC trainings/LAC Sessions within a
Sessions within a year relevant to year using other funds relevant to
1 the chosen learning delivery the chosen learning delivery
modalities (limited face-to- modalities (limited face-to-
face/virtual) face/virtual)

● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers to Performs 3 ancillary services on
best fit to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
teach/facilitate/coach/assist 5 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
(grades/learning areas, special approved class program program before deadline
assignments)
Assigned 85-99% of the teachers Performs 2 ancillary services on
to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
4 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
approved class program program on the deadline

Assigned 70-84% of the teachers Performs 1 ancillary service on

to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
October 2020
4% 3 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.2
to June 2021 approved class program program 1 day after the deadline

Assigned 55- 69% of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades they with high mastery level with high Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
2 best fit within a year supported by mastery level
approved class program program 2-3 days after the
deadline

Assigned 54% and below of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades they with average mastery level Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
1 best fit within a year supported by
approved class program program 4-5 days after the
deadline
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations

coordinated services for the recommended for before the dealine
holistic development of school 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
personnel and learners a year
85-99 % of the teachers were Submitted recommendations on
recommended for the the dealine
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 1
October 2020 recommended for day after the dealine
4% 3 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.2
to June 2021 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
55-69% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 2
recommended for days after the dealine
2 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year

54% and below of the teachers Submitted recommendations 3

were recommended for days after the dealine
1 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
● Initiated and compiled teacher's 100% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
professional documents in 5 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
portfolios authentic portfolio in a year portfolio before March 2017

85-99% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,

4 complete,neat, auhentic and accurate and authentic teacher's
accurate portfolio in a year portfolio first week of March 2017

75-84% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,

October 2020 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
3% 3 authentic portfolio in a year 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.14
to June 2021 portfolio second week of March
2017
55-69% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
2 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
authentic portfolio in a year portfolio 3rd week of March 2017

54%and below of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,

1 have complete,neat ,accurate accurate and authentic teacher's
and authentic portfolio in a year portfolio on April 2017
BASIC ● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages Established linkages with
EDUCATION stakeholders during the 5 with stakeholders with MOA, stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
SERVICES pandemic MOU in a year. the start of the school year.
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

BASIC ● Established linkages with

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's
EDUCATION KRA's OBJECTIVES
stakeholders during the TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
SERVICES pandemic
KRA 4: Established 4 linkages with Established linkages with
PARENT'S stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
INVOLVEMENT AND 4 a year. the first quarter of the school
COMMUNITY year.
PARTNERSHIPS
Established 3 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
(10%) October 2020 3 a year.
2% the 2nd quarter of the school 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.093
to June 2021 year.
Established 2 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
2 a year. the 3rd quarter of the school year.

Established 1linkage with Established linkages with

stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
1 a year. the 4th quarter of the school year.

● Met parents regularly physically Met PTA 5 or more times 90%-100% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings in
or online to confer/inform physically or online in a year to during PTA Meetings (virtual/ advance of the schedule under
about school accomplishments 5 discuss SRC ,etc. supported by physical forum adhering IATF D.O. 25, s. 2017
minutes, agreements,attendance health protocol)
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 4 times physically or 79%-89% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings within
online in a year too discuss SRC, during PTA Meetings (virtual/ the schedule under D.O. 25, s.
4 etc. supported by minutes, physical forum adhering IATF 2017
agreements,attendance health protocol)
sheets,pictures,etc.

Met PTA 3 times physically or 59%-78% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings a week
online in a year to discuss SRC, during PTA Meetings (virtual/ after the schedule under D.O.
October 2020 3 etc. supported by minutes, physical forum adhering IATF 25, s. 2017
2% 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.1
to June 2021 agreements,attendance health protocol)
sheets,pictures,etc.
Met PTA 2 times physically or 39%-58% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 2 weeks
online in a year to discuss SRC, during PTA Meetings (virtual/ after the schedule under D.O.
etc. supported by minutes, physical forum adhering IATF 25, s. 2017
2 agreements,attendance health protocol)
sheets,pictures,etc.
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021
October 2020
Department of Education/Misamis Oriental
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 2% 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.1
to June 2021

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Met PTA 1 time physically or 10%-38% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 3 weeks
online in a year to discuss SRC, during PTA Meetings (virtual/ after the schedule under D.O. 25,
1 etc. supported by minutes, physical forum adhering IATF s. 2017
agreements,attendance health protocol)
sheets,pictures,etc.

● Designed programs and Designed 5 or more programs Implemented 5 or more Implemented programs /projects
projects with stakeholders to /projects with stakeholders to programs /projects with with stakeholders to address
address school needs during address school needs during the stakeholders to address school school needs during the
the pandemic pandemic based on SWOT needs during the pandemic pandemic based on SWOTa
5 supported with program based on SWOT supported with week after the approval of the
design,minutes/agreements, program design, supported with program
pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc pictures,etc

Designed 4 programs /projects Implemented 4 programs Implemented programs /projects

with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to with stakeholders to address
school needs during the address school needs during the school needs during the
pandemic based on SWOT pandemic based on SWOT pandemic based on SWOT,2
4 supported with program supported with program weeks after the approval of the
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

Designed 3 programs /projects Implemented 3 programs Implemented programs /projects

with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to with stakeholders to address
school needs during the address school needs during the school needs during the
October 2020 pandemic based on SWOT pandemic based on SWOT pandemic based on SWOT, a
2% 3 supported with program supported with program month after the approval of the 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.1
to June 2021
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

Designed 2 programs /projects Implemented 2 programs Implemented programs /projects

with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to with stakeholders to address
school needs during the address school needs during the school needs during the
pandemic based on SWOT pandemic based on SWOT pandemic based on SWOT, 2
2 supported with program supported with program months after the approval of the
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
October 2020 NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA 2% Name of Rater: 5 5 VI5 5.00 5.00 0.1
to June 2021
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Designed 1 program /project with Implemented 1 program /project Implemented programs /projects
stakeholders to address school with stakeholders to address with stakeholders to address
needs during the pandemic school needs during the school needs during the
based on SWOT supported with pandemic based on SWOT pandemic based on SWOT,
1 program supported with program 3months after the approval of the
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders every end
of stakeholders stakeholders during programs awards of less cost using funds of the activity/project
(virtual/limited face-to-face outside from
5 observing IATF health protocol) MOOE/PTA/Teachers
within the school year fully
documented
Awarded 15 to 19 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during
during programs (virtual/limited awards of less cost using funds assembly every end of the
face-to-face observing IATF from PTA grading period
4
health protocol) at the end of the
school year fully documented

Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during

during programs (virtual/limited awards of less cost using funds education week celebration
October 2020 face-to-face observing IATF from MOOE
2%
3 4 5 5 4.67 4.67 0.093
to June 2021 health protocol) at the end of the
school year fully documented

Awarded 5-9 stakeholders during Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders at the end
programs (virtual/limited face-to- awards of high cost of March
2 face observing IATF health
protocol) at the end of the school
year fully documented
Awarded 4 and below Use most expensive awards of Awarded stakeholders during
stakeholders during programs high cost using funds from the bregada eskwela .
(virtual/limited face-to-face teacher.
1 observing IATF health protocol) at
the end of the school year

● Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts before it is filed
resolution of conflicts in school 5 school level with complete in the school level
documents
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

● Mediated and ensured PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's resolution of conflicts in school
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts after it is filed

4 school level with incomplete in the school level
documents

conflicts not resolved within the Resolved conflicts in two hearings

October 2020 school level and reaches to after it is filed in the school level
1% 3 district office with complete 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.05
to June 2021
documents
all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in three
2 the school level reaches division hearings after it is filed in the
level with complete documents school level

all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in four

1 the school level with complete hearings after it is filed in the
documents school level

BASIC ● Formulated school policies with Formulated 5 or more school Formulated school policies with
EDUCATION stakeholders strategically policies with the participation of the participation of the
SERVICES suited to the local 5 the stakeholders fully stakeholders fully documented
condition/situation documented before the start of classes

Formulated 4 school policies with Formulated school policies with

the participation of the the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented
during the start of classes
Formulated 3 school policies with Formulated school policies with
the participation of the the participation of the
April 2019 to 3 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented a
1% 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.05
March 2020 month after the start of classes
Formulated 2 school policies with Formulated school policies with
the participation of the the participation of the
2 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented
two months after the start of
classes
Formulated 1school policy with Formulated school policies with
the participation of the the participation of the
1 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented
three months after the start of
classes
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

● Divide equally the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7 100% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
loads to all school teaching reflecting 6 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
personnel based from the 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
excerpts from Basic Education teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days before
Learning Continuity Plan SDS within the school year. the deadline
(BELCP)
KRA 5: Prepared/submitted SF 7 85-99% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
SCHOOL reflecting 5 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
LEADERSHIP, 4 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
MANAGEMENT AND teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days before
OPERATIONS SDS within the school year. the deadline
(20%)
Prepared/submitted SF 7 70-84% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 4 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
October 2020
to June 2021
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.16
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS on the
SDS within the school year. deadline
Prepared/submitted SF 7 55-69% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 3 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days after
SDS within the school year. the deadline

Prepared/submitted SF 7 54%and below of the teachers Prepared/submitted SF 7

reflecting 6 loads with garnered awards as coordinators reflecting loads with
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the on top of their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days after
SDS within the school year. the deadline
● Led and implemented Led and implemented 5 or more Addressed 100% of the identified Submitted Accomplishment
educational programs aligned educational programs aligned in school problems supported by Report before the date spicified
in the new normal education the new normal education accomplishment report and in the approved implementation
standards 5 standards, program design is noted by SDS plan
approved by SDS before the
implementation

Led and implemented 4 Addressed 85% - 99% of the Submitted Accomplishment

educational programs aligned in identified school problems Report on the date spicified in
the new normal education supported by accomplishment the approved implementation
4 standards, program design is report and noted by SDS plan
approved by SDS before the
implementation

October 2020
3% 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.12
to June 2021
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
● Led and implemented
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA
educational programs aligned Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: in the new normal
PRINCIPAL I education Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
standards
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Led and implemented 3 Addressed 70% - 84% of the Submitted Accomplishment

educational programs aligned in identified school problems Report 1day after the date
October 2020 the new normal education supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
3% 3 standards, program design is report and noted by SDS implementation plan 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.12
to June 2021
approved by SDS before the
implementation

Led and implemented 2 Addressed 55% - 69% of the Submitted Accomplishment

educational programs aligned in identified school problems Report 2 days after the date
the new normal education supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
2 standards, program design is report and noted by SDS implementation plan
approved by SDS before the
implementation

Led and implemented 1 Addressed 54% and below of the Submitted Accomplishment
educational program aligned in identified school problems Report 3 days after the date
the new normal education supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
1 standards, program design is report and noted by SDS implementation plan
approved by SDS before the
implementation

BASIC ● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate
EDUCATION and Management and ,authentic liquidation reports together with Cash advance for ,authentic liquidation reports 3
SERVICES Operations Functions in 5 monthly the next month with no instance days before the deadline
accordance to the new of unliquidated CA.
guidelines set by the
Department of Education Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate
DepEd ,authentic liquidation reports bi- without CA for the next month ,authentic liquidation reports 2
4 monthly with no instance of unliquidated days before the deadline
CA
Submitted incomplete, Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate
accurate ,authentic liquidation both Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports 1
October 2020 3 reports monthly month with one instances of days before the deadline
3% 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.12
to June 2021 unliquidated CA

Submitted Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not both Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports on
2 authentic liquidation reports month with two instances of the deadline
monthly unliquidated CA

Submitted Submitted liquidation report ; or Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not bjoth Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports 1-3
1 authentic liquidation reports bi- month with three instances of days after the deadline
monthly unliquidated CA
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested 100% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials set from instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers immediately after the
the DepEd guidelines in the distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
new normal education 5 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
standards summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested 85-99% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers a day after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
4 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
75-84% of the requested 75-84% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 2 days after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
October 2020 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
3% 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.12
to June 2021 summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.

55-74% of the requested 55-74% of the requested Distributed instructional materials

instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 3 days after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
2 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.

54% and below of the requested 54% and below of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 4 days after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
1 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.

● Led the preparation/adjustment Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
of BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP,
SOB, PPMP and ensured SOB, PPMP and ensured 100% APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured
participation of stakeholders 5 participation of internal and participation of internal and participation of internal and
external stakeholders approved external stakeholders. external stakeholders before the
by SDS supported with deadline
documents
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

● Led the preparation/adjustment

of BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP,
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
SOB, PPMP and ensured
participation of stakeholders PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP,
SOB, PPMP and ensured 85- APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured
99% participation of internal and participation of internal and participation of internal and
4 external stakeholders approved external stakeholders. external stakeholders on the
by SDS supported with deadline
documents

Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP,
SOB, PPMP and ensured 75- APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured
October 2020
4% 3 84% participation of internal and participation of internal and participation of internal and
4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.16
to June 2021 external stakeholders approved external stakeholders with external stakeholders 1 day after
by SDS supported with revisions on the two the deadline
documents

Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP,
SOB, PPMP and ensured 55- APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured
74% participation of internal and participation of internal and participation of internal and
2
external stakeholders approved external stakeholders with external stakeholders 2 days
by SDS supported with revisions on the three after the deadline
documents
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I October 2020 Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
4% 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.16
to June 2021
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original

based BELCP, ESIP, AIP, APP, ,need-based BELCP, ESIP, AIP,
SOB, PPMP and ensured 54% APP, SOB, PPMP and ensured
and below participation of internal participation of internal and
1 and external stakeholders external stakeholders 3 days
approved by SDS supported with after the deadline
documents

● Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special Conducted at least 4 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs classes for learners with special classes for learners with special with special needs at the start of
with strict adherence of IATF 5 needs with complete documents needs the school year.
standards (enrolment,teacher,needs)

Organized 3 special classes for Conducted at least 3 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs a week after
4 complete documents ( enrolment, needs the start of the school year.
teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for Conducted at least 2 special Conducted classes for learners
October 2020 learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs two weeks
3% 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.12
to June 2021 3 complete documents needs after the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)

Organized 1 special class for Conducted 1 special classes for Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with learners with special needs with with special needs a month after
2 complete documents no documents the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)

Organized no special class for non-compliant Conducted classes for learners

1 learners with special needs. with special needs two months
after the start of the school year.

100% 4.50

1. REGION X- OUTSTANDING SCHOOL HEAD BEST IMPLEMENTER IN MODULAR LDM, 2. REGION X -OUTSTANDING BEST IMPLEMENTING SCHOOL IN ONLINE LDM, 3.DIVISION CHAMPION
BRIGADA SA PAGBASA 2020 BEST IMPLEMENTER
PLUS FACTOR 0.50

NUMERICAL RATING 5.00

OUTSTANDING O

LEGEND:

Ratee: Rater: 4.5 - 5.0 - O

 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: SAMY T. IGLORIA Name of Rater: NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI
Position: PRINCIPAL I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: APRIL 2020 - JULY 23, 2021 Date of Review: JULY 23, 2021

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

SAMY T. IGLORIA NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD., CESO VI 3.5 - 4.499 - VS

Principal 1 Assistant Schools Division Superintendent 2.5 - 3.499 - S
1.5 - 2.499 - US
Approving Authority:
JONATHAN S. DELA PENA, PhD, CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent Page 6 of 6