i

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED SECURITY MANAGEMENT

OF PAMPANGA STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

A Special Study
Presented to the Faculty of the
Department of Geodetic Engineering
College of Resource Engineering Automation and Mechanization
Pampanga State Agricultural University
PAC, Magalang, Pampanga

In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Bachelor of Science in Geodetic Engineering

MARY ANNE G. PEÑA

June 2020
 ii

APPROVAL SHEET

This special study hereto attached entitled “GEOGRAPHIC

INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED SECURITY MANAGEMENT OF PAMPANGA
STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY”, prepared and submitted by MARY
ANNE G. PEÑA, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree,
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN GEODETIC ENGINEERING, is hereby
recommended for acceptance and approval.

_____________________
MELANIE S. SUYU, MSME, GE
Adviser
_____________
Date Signed

DEFENSE PANEL

_______________________ __________________________
GENESIS A. CASIÑO, GE MA. CAROLINA V. TARUN, ICE
Member Member
___________________ ___________________
Date Signed Date Signed

______________________ ____________________________
LYNDON G. SOLIS, D.T. MADELIENE R. SOLIS, D.T.
Member Member
___________________ ___________________
Date Signed Date Signed

______________________ _______________________________________
RUSSEL A. RIVERA, GE ROSEMARIE S. MACMAC, MBM, GE, REA, REB
Member Member
___________________ ___________________
Date Signed Date Signed
 iii

Approved and accepted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the

degree of Bachelor of Science in Geodetic Engineering, Pampanga State
Agricultural University, Magalang, Pampanga.

_________________________________________

ROSEMARIE S. MACMAC, MBM, GE, REA, REB

Chairman, Department of Geodetic Engineering

________________

Date Signed

_______________________________

ROSANI P. MANALASTAS, Ph.D.

Dean, College of Resource Engineering Automation and Mechanization

________________

Date Signed
 iv

Data Testing Certificate

 v

English Critic Certification

 vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Immeasurable appreciation and deepest gratitude for the help and support
are extended to the following persons who contributed to the success and
completion of this study.

To her beloved family, Mr. Larry M. Peña, Mrs. Myra G. Peña, Lolo
Emiliano Peña, Lola Julie Peña, Micah Peña and Mark Daniel Peña for their
unconditional love, trust, timely encouragement, endless patience and for
providing everything she needed.

To her adviser, Engr. Melanie Suyu, for the continuous support, patience,
motivation, words of encouragement, guidance, enthusiasm and immense
knowledge. Her guidance, insightful discussions and suggestions helped the
researcher in the completion of this study.

To the Security Personnel of PSAU, who helped and guided the

researcher in gathering the data needed in the study.

To the Geodetic Engineering Faculty, for their generous support,

assistance and advices.

To her friends, Alexia, Aljon, Shiela, Kyara, Jessa, Millicent, Emilour,

Glenn, Jonica, Emily, Antonio, Kmiel and Nomer, for their love, moral support
and remarkable encouragement.

To Mr. Faustine Robert Suba and Kim Zacarias Soriano who have
been her constant source of inspiration.

Above all, to our Almighty God, for His unconditional love, gratitude,
guidance, wisdom and constant flow of ideas which help a great deal to the
success of this study.
 vii

DEDICATION

This research study is profoundly dedicated to my family: my father Mr.

Larry M. Peña, my mother Mrs. Myra G. Peña, my grandparents Lolo Emiliano
Peña and Lola Julie Peña, my siblings Micah Peña and Mark Daniel Peña and
my son Kim Zacarias Soriano. This is also dedicated to my adviser, Engr.
Melanie S. Suyu; and to all the faculty members of Department of Geodetic
Engineering, especially to Engr. Rosemarie S. Macmac, Engr. Maria Carolina V.
Tarun, Engr. Genesis A. Casiño, and Engr. Russell Rivera; to my friends and
classmates; and above all, to our Almighty God.
 viii

ABSTRACT

MARY ANNE G. PEÑA, Department of Geodetic Engineering, College of

Resource Engineering Automation and Mechanization, Pampanga State
Agricultural University, June 2020, “GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
BASED SECURITY MANAGEMENT OF PAMPANGA STATE AGRICULTURAL
UNIVERSITY”.

Adviser: MELANIE S. SUYU, MSME, GE

The study entitled “GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED SECURITY

MANAGEMENT OF PAMPANGA STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY” was
presented to the Department of Geodetic Engineering, College of Resource
Engineering Automation and Mechanization, Pampanga State Agricultural
University.

This descriptive research aimed to determine the security management of

Pampanga State Agricultural University as perceived by the respective personnel
who were involved in the safety and security of the university. This study also
focused in generating a Geographical Information System Based Security Map of
Pampanga State Agricultural University particularly in the exterior premises and
university buildings. The main research instrument used in the study was field
survey and distribution of questionnaires that are based from the Industrial
Security Management under Law Enforcement Administration (LEA)-Philippine
Criminology concepts to support and validate the security measures observed by
the researcher. The output of the study was developed using multiple software
such as UTM Geo Map, Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS) and
Google Earth.

In general, it was observed that the Pampanga State Agricultural University has
the following security measures in its exterior premises: fences, gates,
streetlights and security cameras. However, it was also observed that insufficient
fencing existed in the campus perimeter. The existing fences did not also meet
the required height and no longer in good condition. It was also observed that
 ix

some areas in the university didn’t have security cameras for better surveillance.
In terms of university buildings, it was observed that mostly have fully functional
lights, effective window locks, effective door locks, and bulgar bars in their
windows. However, there are only few buildings have emergency
warnings/alarms, emergency lights and security cameras.

Thus, this study recommends the Pampanga State Agricultural University to

reevaluate their security management and integrate the use of Geographic
Information System in their safety and security planning activities since it allows
greater enhancements not just in monitoring but also planning and forecasting
potential security threats. Furthermore, this will be useful in future since the
updating of this geodatabase is easy in GIS software.
 x

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE i
APPROVAL SHEET ii
CERTIFICATIONS iv
ACKNOWLEDEMENT vi
DEDICATION vii
ABSTRACT viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS x
LIST OF TABLES xiii
LIST OF FIGURES xiv

CHAPTER I: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND 1

Introduction 1
Statements of the Problem 4
Objectives of the Study 4
Conceptual Framework 6
Paradigm of the Study 6
Significance of the Study 8
Scope and Delimitation 8
Definition of Terms 9
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES 11
Related Literature 11
Foreign 11
Local 12
Related Studies 12
Foreign 12
Local 14
 xi

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY 15

Area of the Study 15

Research Design 16

Technical Background 17

Concepts and Technology Used 17

Research Instruments and Data Collection 18

Tools for Data Analysis 20

CHAPTER IV: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND

INTERPRETATION OF DATA 23

Security posts and offices of Pampanga State Agricultural

University 24
Security measures of Pampanga State Agricultural University
in terms of School Campus 26
Exterior Premises 26

University Buildings 36

Security measures of Pampanga State Agricultural University

in terms of Security Personnel 44

Geographic Information System based Neighborhood Map

of Pampanga State Agricultural University 46
CHAPTER V: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 52

Summary 52

Conclusions 52

Recommendations 53

BIBLIOGRAPHY 54
 xii

APPENDICES 56

A Request Letter to PSAU President 57

B Letter of Continuation to PSAU VPAA 60

C Letter of Continuation to CREAM Dean 61

D Survey Questionnaires 62

E Sample Raw Data of Questionnaires 67

F Documentation 70

CURRICULUM VITAE 72
 xiii

LIST OF TABLES

Table No. Page

1 Likert Scale 22

2 Number of Security Guards 25

3 Status/Condition of PSAU Fence 27

4 Access Control 29

5 Status/Condition of PSAU Streetlights 32

6 University Buildings 37

7 Security Measures in Academic Buildings 38

8 Security Measures in University Services Buildings 39

9 Security Measures in Science & Technology Buildings 40

10 Security Measures in Residential Buildings 41

11 Summary of Security Measures in University Buildings 42

12 Students and Employees’ Perceptions towards the Duties

and Responsibilities of the Security Personnel
44
 xiv

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No. Page

1 Paradigm of the Study 7

2 Map of the Study Area 15

3 Research Design 16

4 Security Posts and Offices Location Map 24

5 PSAU Fence Location Map 26

6 PSAU Streetlights Location Map 31

7 PSAU Security Cameras Location Map 34

8 PSAU Security Measures Location Map 35

9 Security Measures in University Buildings 36

10 Geographic Information System based Neighborhood

Map of Pampanga State Agricultural University 46

11 Portion of Barangay San Agustin Map 48

12 Portion of Barangay San Vicente Map 49

13 Portion of Barangay Ayala Map 50

14 Portion of Mt. Arayat Map 51

 1

CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction

Security refers to the protection of individuals, organizations, and

properties against external threats that are likely to cause harm. Security is

generally focused on ensuring that external factors do not cause trouble or

unwelcome situation to the organization, individuals, and the properties within the

premises.

According to Ullman (2011), security is not a goal to be pursued at all

costs, but a consequence of measures adopted to reduce possible threats and

vulnerabilities

The security of schools has become a growing concern due to recent

changes in our society including terrorist attacks, gun crime, vandalism, arson,

theft, bullying, fighting, sexual harassment, and other issues prevalent in our

society that put the safety of children, teachers, staff and parents at risk.

Schools use a variety of practices and procedures to promote the security

of students, faculty, and staff. Certain practices such as locking or monitoring

doors and gates are intended to limit or control access to school campuses,

others uses metal detectors and security cameras are intended to monitor or

restrict students' and visitors' behavior on campus. Neighborhoods must also

consider because what happens to its neighborhood can affect the school

security.
 2

In United States, considers the used of random metal detector checks on

students, closed campus for students during lunch, random dog sniffs to check

for drugs, random sweeps for contraband, enforced strict dress code, use of

cameras to monitor school, emergency call buttons in classrooms, and an

observed security guard.

In Ilo-ilo City, Philippines, most of the schools have not met the standards

as stipulated on the Guidelines of 2010 DepEd Facilities Manual. Children are

considered less safe and secured in terms of land contour, site elevation,

distance from ill-repute establishment, distance from street, road safety, with

traffic aides, emergency access, playground, school canteen, school with fire

alarm, doors that swing outward.

The Pampanga State Agricultural University occupies approximately 500

hectares of government agricultural lands in the town of Magalang, province of

Pampanga. At present state, PSAU has a huge number of students and

employees that are living, studying and working inside the university. Students

and employees have the right to feel safe and secure that when a situation arise,

they have the right security measures and procedures in place to keep

themselves and those around them safe. Parents too should feel reassured with

the knowledge that when their child attends school, they will be safe in the care

of the teachers and the security of the university.

It was the purpose of the study to assess and determine the security

management of Pampanga State Agricultural University specifically the locations

of security post and offices, security measures in terms of school campus and
 3

security personnel and to determine if there are any security maps available in

the university.

A geographic information system (GIS) is designed to capture, store,

manipulate, analyze, manage, and present all types of geographical data. A

system that creates, manages, analyzes, and maps all types of data.

The School of Geographical Sciences Northeast Normal University in

China developed campus emergency system and explored the key technologies

and methods in combining GIS with security management. According to

Shengwu Duan (2014), compared with the traditional management system, the

developed campus emergency system has geography meaning like spatial

analysis. It reflects the prospect of technological of geographical information

science.

Thus, this study could provide vital information in making GIS-based

Security Maps that are more relevant and consistent with the existing security

measures of Pampanga State Agricultural University to minimize undesirable

consequences in terms of safety and security of the university.

 4

Statements of the Problem:

The study focused on the assessment of the security measures of

Pampanga State Agricultural University and the generation of GIS-based

Security Maps that could be used as a guide for future planning and

development.

Specifically, it aims to answer the following questions:

1. Where are the locations of security posts and offices of Pampanga

State Agricultural University?

2. What security measures are being implemented by the Pampanga

State Agricultural University in terms of:

A. School Campus

A.1. Exterior Premises

A.2. University Buildings

B. Security Personnel

3. Is there an existing security maps and database for the security

management of Pampanga State Agricultural University?

Objectives of the Study

The main objective of this study is to assess the security management of

Pampanga State Agricultural University.

Specifically, it also aims to:

 5

1. Identify the location of security posts and offices of Pampanga State

Agricultural University.

2. Determine the security measures in Pampanga State Agricultural

University in terms of:

A. School Campus

A.1. Exterior Premises

A.2. University Buildings

B. Security Personnel

3. Generate Geographical Information System based Security Maps of

Pampanga State Agricultural University.

 6

Conceptual Framework

Security is an important management issue for all higher education

institutions, both for the safety and security of students, employees and visitors,
and because of the potential damage to institutions’ reputations as a result of
crime-related incidents.

All institutions endeavor to create a ‘feel good’ factor, enabling staff,

students and visitors to carry out their activities without unnecessary pressures,
both during and outside normal working hours. Students, staff and visitors should
contribute to that environment, by their own conduct and actions. Like health and
safety, security is a responsibility that must be shared by all.

According to the Industrial Security Management under Law Enforcement

Administration- Philippine Criminology the general security techniques has three
(3) line of defense: the perimeter barrier (perimeter fence, lighting, alarm
systems, and other protective and electronic security system), building controls
(door and window locks, lighting, alarms, and other protective and electronic
system), and interior controls (security plans and controls). The researcher used
its concepts as basis in determining the security measures of PSAU through field
survey and distribution of questionnaires.

It is in this context that the researcher came up with the conceptual

framework of the study. Figure 1 shows the paradigm of the study of the present
investigation, utilizing the input-process-output.

Meanwhile, the process involved was the descriptive method of research

using survey questionnaires and digitization of geographic data acquired from the
secondary data with the output of Geographic Information System based Security
Maps of Pampanga State Agricultural University.
 7

The researcher used various computer applications such as Google Earth

and Quantum GIS (QGIS) to generate a 2-Dimensional map of PSAU. A GIS-
based map was created for the better understanding and visualization of the
existing security management of the university.

Input Process Output

Primary Data Field Survey Geographic

Secondary Data Questionnaires Information
Digitizing System based
Data editing Security Maps of
Pampanga State
Agricultural
Figure 1. Paradigm of the Study
University
 8

Significance of the Study

The researcher believes that the output of this study will benefit the following:

University Administrators. The University administrators who employ strict

discipline policies in the university may use this study to help them in the
assessment of the security management of the university.

Students. This study may help the students to find and locate the security offices
and posts in case of emergencies arise.

Employees. This study may help the employees to avoid the places or areas
that are not safe and have low security services.

Security Task Force. This study may be extremely valuable, insightful, and
significant for the security task force as they plan and assess security measures
inside the university.

Future Researchers. This study may be used by future researchers as a

reference or basis in the conduct of similar studies. This study will provide
information and ideas for future researchers.

Scope and Delimitation

The study covers the assessment of the security management of

Pampanga State Agricultural University which includes the security measures
available to the university buildings and the determination of the location of
security offices, security posts, fences, gates, streetlights, security cameras and
its neighborhood. It also covers the assessment of the security policies
implemented by the security personnel in the university.
 9

Definition of terms

Assessment. The evaluation or estimation of the nature, quality, or ability of

someone or something.

Digitizing. Is the process of converting geographic data either from a hard copy

or a scanned image into vector data by tracing the features.

Exterior Premises. Means those portions of land which are exposed to public

view or any property outside and around any building or structure erected

thereon.

Geographic Information System(GIS). Is a system designed to capture, store,

manipulate, analyze, manage, and present all types of geographical data.

Management. Includes the activities of setting the strategy of an organization

and coordinating the efforts of its employees (or of volunteers) to accomplish its

objectives through the application of available resources, such as financial,

natural, technological, and human resources.

Quantum Geographic Information System. Is a free and open-source cross-

platform desktop geographic information system (GIS) application that supports

viewing, editing, and analysis of geospatial data.

School Campus. The grounds and buildings of a university or college.

 10

Security. Is freedom from, or resilience against, potential harm caused by

others.

Security Map. Is a map used to plan for and respond to security threats, and are

useful for training exercises or planning security for large events.

Security Office. An office responsible for the security of the institution's property

staffs and workers.

Security Personnel. Are authorized to protect people, information and assets

from what is objectively and reasonably believed to be an imminent threat of

death or serious bodily harm.

Security Post. A small building for the soldiers who are protecting a place.

Security measures. Measures taken as a precaution against theft or espionage

or sabotage etc.

University Buildings. Group of buildings belonging to a school, college,

or university.
 11

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

This chapter presents the review of literature related to the security

management of school campuses, institutions and geographic information

system studies. It also enables a better understanding about relevant foreign and

local researches relevant to the present study.

Related Literature

To provide a better perspective on the objectives of the study several

documents are hereby presented:

Foreign

According to Pisapia (2015), planning safety and security measures for

major sport events requires a reliance on spatial data and geographical reference

maps to define resources and physical security system requirements.

Isaca (2010) states that an information security framework is important

because it provides a map for the implementation, evaluation and improvement

of information security practices. As an organization implements its framework, it

will be able to articulate goals and drive ownership of them, evaluate the security

of information over time, and determine the need for additional measures.
 12

According to Dempsey (2008), security survey is a tool used to physically

examine premises and an inspection of all security systems and processes in

order to identify any vulnerabilities. It is used to reduce risks.

As stated by Mark Rowh (2019), the geographic information systems

(GIS) and indoor positioning systems (IPS) provides an accurate way to locate

students, safety officers, employees and others during an emergency—offer

many security applications for campuses. These systems alert security when

someone is not where they should be. The technology can also be used to

locate assets such as lab equipment, tools and vehicles.

Local

According to Espina (2015), the security environment is dynamically

evolving environment and its changes can be very effective monitored by

geographic information systems tools (GIS). GIS systems are commonly used

worldwide as an effective tool for analysis and visualization of data, and are

widely used in the field of security and security sciences.

Related Studies

It is very noteworthy to view a number of finished studies which helps in

familiarizing the researcher with information that are relevant and similar to the

present study and these are as follows:

Foreign
 13

According to Shengwu Duan (2014), the Design and Implementation of

Campus Real-Time Monitoring and Emergency Management System in

Northeast Normal University, Changchun China, only in this way can we achieve

the sharing of resources, overall planning, rational distribution, reduce duplication

of work. The digital campus is the inevitable trend of development of modern

distance education and network. The combination of traditional information

management system and GIS shows that GIS technology has strong vitality. In

this paper, we developed campus emergency system and explored the key

technologies and methods in combining GIS with security management. When

compared with the traditional management system, it has geography meaning

like spatial analysis. It reflects the prospect of technological of geographical

information science. Therefore, this system provides a new way for campus

security research and accumulates valuable experience.

Nick Malloy (2017) stated that student security at Humboldt State

University (HSU) is something that is highly considered by faculty, administration,

and most importantly, students. A well-lit campus provides a sense of comfort

and allows students to feel safe walking around at night. Geographic Information

Systems (GIS) can be used to track and analyze spatial trends in a multitude of

fields. For this research, the frequency of light posts will determine how well lit

the campus is and if this could be a measurement of student safety. Using QGIS,

each light post point was assigned an attribute with the average radius in feet.

Multiple maps were created that depict what areas of Humboldt State are most

adequately lit.
 14

According to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and

Technology Secretariat Department of Facilities Planning and Administration

(2007) from the “Inspection and Improvement of Security in School Facilities in

Japan Case Study”, in order to recognize the current status of a facility, it is

effective to make "School facilities safety map" (Hereafter, referred to as "Safety

map-making") to make an overall understanding of the security measures by

showing the locations of wherever weak against intruders, evacuation route,

location of security systems on the floor plans of the school or each floor to

visually present the safety elements.

Local

According to Jerome Baradillo et al. (2017) in their study “Assessment on

CSU Campus Security Services: Perceptions and Precautions”, the assessment

of campus security services of the Caraga State University can be a useful tool

for the administration to develop or fill the inadequacy of the existing security

system. Aside from ensuring a high quality of education, the campus security is

as crucial as the latter. Student’s from all walks of life deserves to have a

secured environment and not having to worry about any harm as they grapple

their way through success.

 15

CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY

This chapter discussed the research methods that were used in the study

as well as the applicable processes which helped in solving problems stated in

Chapter 1. Furthermore, this section explained the techniques of the researcher

in assessing the problems, the spatial and attribute data and methods applied

with the integration of Geographic Information System, how the data was analyze

and the system of data interpretation.

Area of the Study

PSAU lies at the foothills of Mount Arayat and is about 3.5 km east of the

town proper of Magalang, Pampanga. The university occupies approximately 500

hectares of government agricultural lands in the town of Magalang, province of

Pampanga.
 16

Figure 2. Map of the Study Area

Research Design

This section discussed the research methods used in this study as well as
the applicable processes in solving problems. The study used a descriptive
method which describes the data gathered to derive results and it will be used to
interpret and analyze the gathered information.

Figure 3 displays the research design used by the researcher in acquiring

and processing data and interpreting result to answer the study’s statement of the
problem.

Data Gathering Data Processing Analysis of Data

Spatial Data Digitizing

Creation of Map
Non Spatial
Data
Field Survey
Geographic
Information System
Based Security
Management of
PSAU

Figure 3: Research Design

 17

The researcher used spatial data such as the map of PSAU and non-

spatial data with the use of questionnaires that will be use to describe the spatial

data. Field survey was conducted to assess the different security measures

around the university. Digitizing is the process of tracing the features of the map

in either point, line, or polygon. Once the data have been analyzed, the creation

of maps through QGIS and with the help of other related GIS application will be

conducted, then followed by the interpretation of the result.

Technical Background

The researcher explains all the concepts in developing a GIS- based Map
Security Management of Pampanga State Agricultural University. It also includes
the different software used in generating, designing and developing the
Geographical Information System based Security Maps.

Concepts and Technology Used

The following and technologies were used in creating, designing and

developing the map:

1. Google Earth

Google Earth is a computer program that renders

a 3D representation of Earth based primarily on satellite imagery. The
program maps the Earth by superimposing satellite images, aerial
photography, and GIS data onto a 3D globe, allowing users to see cities and
landscapes from various angles. The researcher used Google Earth in
digitizing the buildings, roads, fences and other features.

2. QGIS

QGIS known as Quantum GIS is a free and open-source cross-

platform desktop geographic information system (GIS) application that
supports viewing, editing, and analysis of geospatial data. The researcher
 18

used this software in generating a 2-Dimensional map of Pampanga State

Agricultural University and designed the map that would be used in creating a
web map.

3. Qgis2web Plugin
Qgis2web is a QGIS plugin that enables the user to export his or
her map to a Leaflet or Open Layers web map. This plugin is a useful way
to get started with web mapping and create an interactive web map from
static GIS data layers. This enables the researcher to run the map using
the local host or through the web by embedding or adding it as one of the
website pages. The researcher used this in generating a web map.

4. UTM Geo Map

UTM Geo Map is an android application designed to get latitude,

longitude, and UTM WGS 84 and MGRS (Military Grid Reference System)
coordinates from GPS (Global Position System) / Map in real time. The
researcher used this app by creating marker / marking points, saving
coordinates data into database, and exporting file to KML to be viewed in
Google Earth and QGIS.

Research Instruments and Data Collection

This study is a descriptive research for it provided information very

essential in answering the questions posted.

A. Internet Research

The study made use of internet research in gathering local and

foreign literatures and studies.

B. Library Research

Library research was used to improve this study. The use of this
method is to look for and gather appropriate information that would be
helpful on the study.
 19

C. Field Survey

Field survey is the collection and gathering of information of a

place. The researcher conducted a field survey to assess and identify the
different security measures of PSAU.
D. Online Survey

An online survey is a questionnaire that the target audience can

complete over the Internet. Online surveys are usually created as Web
forms with a database to store the answers and statistical software to
provide analysis. The researcher conducted online survey as an
alternative way for face to face survey.

E. Questionnaire

Questionnaires were used to validate the observed security

measures in the university. The researcher used the concepts of
Industrial Security Management under LEA as basis to formulate
questionnaires. The study used two sets of questionnaires. The first
questionnaire was used to identify the physical security measures of
PSAU. The second questionnaire was used to determine the perceptions
of the students and employees towards the security personnel duties and
responsibilities. After gathering the data, the researcher analyzed,
classified, tabulated and tallied all the gathered data. This statistical
treatment of data was used in the study to describe the numeric measure
and properties of the items that have been analyzed.

F. Sources of Data

The respondents of the study were the academic, non-academic

personnel and students of the university that aimed at the results of
questionnaires. Field survey and distribution of structured questionnaires
was conducted. The data were gathered and subjected to statistical
analysis.
 20

The respondents of the first questionnaire were the thirty-three (33)

security personnel of the Pampanga State Agricultural University.

The number of respondents of the second questionnaire is 98

which comprises 82 students and 16 employees of Pampanga State
Agricultural University.

Tools for Data Analysis

A. Slovin’s Formula

Slovin’s formula was used in this study to determine the number of

samples from the total population that will be use in the second
questionnaire. The formula is the number of sample (n) equals to the total
number of population (N) divided by the sum of 1 and the product of total
population (N) and the squared of marginal error (e).

The following is the Slovin’s formula:

Where:
N
n= 2
n= sample size

1+Ne N= population
e= margin of error

The total population of PSAU community in the second semester of

the academic year 2019-2020 is 5252. These includes 4918 students and
334 employees. The level of confidence used by the researcher in the
study is 90% giving a 0.10 marginal error.

Solution:

5252
n= 2
1+(5252 )(.10 )
N
n= 2
1+Ne
 21

n=98 .13

n=98
Based on the solution, the respondents for the second
questionnaire were 98.

B. Sampling technique

Sampling is a process used in statistical analysis in which a

predetermined number of observations are taken from a larger
population. The sampling technique that used in this study particularly in
questionnaire 2 is simple random sampling. Simple random sampling is
one of the most basic and simplest forms of sampling used. The
basic principle behind the method is that every element in a population
retains the exact same probability of being selected into a sample.

C. Percentage

This will employ to determine the frequency counts and percentage

distribution of personal related variables of the respondents.

Formula:

F
%= ×100
N

Where:

% is the percentage

F is the Frequency

N is the total number of respondents

100 is a constant value

 22

D. Frequency and Percentage Distribution

Table 1: Likert Scale

Mean Scale Descriptive Rating

3.50-4.00 4 Strongly Agree

2.50-3.49 3 Agree
1.50-2.49 2 Disagree

1.0- 1.49 1 Strongly Disagree

These were used to determine the frequency counts and

percentage distribution of the respondent’s profile variables using this
formula:

x̄ = ∑ x /N

Where:

x̄ = mean
∑ = summation of values
N = number of respondents
 23

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter answers the objectives of the study and presents the data
analysis and interpretation of data collected.

The research study entitled ―The Geographic Information System based

Security Management of Pampanga State Agricultural University was made
using Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS). The researcher
conducted field survey to identify the security measures available to the school
campus particularly to the exterior premises and university buildings. The
identified security measures in the exterior premises are security posts, security
offices, security fence, streetlights and security cameras. The identified security
measures to the university buildings are alarms, lighting, door and window locks,
bulgar bars and security cameras. The researcher produced a map which
contains the identified security measures in the university.

The researcher also created a 500 m-neighborhood map that covers the
different assets located starting from the boundary of PSAU up to 500 m away
from it. The identified assets are houses, schools, churches, farm lands, trees,
retail stores, boarding houses, sidecar business, poultry and live stocks, aviary,
computer shops, food stalls, gasoline stations and resorts.
 24

The Security Posts and Offices of Pampanga State Agricultural University

Figure 4: The Security Posts and Offices Location Map

Figure 4 shows the locations of the security posts and offices of

Pampanga State Agricultural University. At present, PSAU has a total of 33
security personnel which composed of thirty-one (31) security guards and two (2)
security officers. There is also two (2) security office and three (3) security post
within the university.
 25

Table 2: Number of Security Guards

Location Number of Guard/s

Main Entrance 2

Gate 2 2

FTC Exit 1

Administration Building 1

Avenue Corner of Voag Building 1

Façade 1

Patrol 2

According to the Philippine Society for Industrial Security, these are the

different areas that are need to be controlled by the security guards; entrances
and exit points, restricted areas, buildings, and parking lots.

The total number of security personnel is thirty-three (33). There are thirty-
one (31) security guards and two (2) security officers in the university. There are
three (3) shifts per day and every shift there are ten (10) security guards on duty
 26

around the university. At present, the total number of population of PSAU is

5252. Therefore, the security guard- population ratio in the university is 1:526.

The security measures of Pampanga State Agricultural University

in terms of: School Campus ---- Exterior Premises

Figure 5: PSAU Fence Location Map

Figure 5 shows the fence of Pampanga State Agricultural University.

Fence is designed primarily to prevent physical access between two areas.
There were two types of fence in the university; a solid fence and a wire fence.
 27

According to the Industrial Security Management under Law Enforcement

Administration- Philippine Criminology, the minimum height for fence is 8 feet.
The height of the fence of PSAU was only 5.97 feet. Therefore, it didn’t meet the
required height for fence.

   

Table 3: Status/Condition of PSAU Fence

Is there a fence/wall surrounding the entire

f %
premises?

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Is the security fence or wall at least 8 feet

f %
high?

Yes 0 0.00

No 33 100.00

Total 33 100.00

Is the fence well lit at night? f %

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Is the wire of the fence/the wall still in good

f %
condition?

Yes 0 0.00

No 33 100.00
 28

Total 33 100.00

Is there alarm support to the fence (an early

f %
warning intrusion detection alarm)?

Yes 0 0.00

No 33 100.00

Total 33 100.00

Is the fence patrolled by a security guard (on

f %
foot) at least every two hours?

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Is there a budget/fund available for the

f %
maintenance and replacement of the fence ?

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Table 3 shows the perceptions of the thirty-three (33) security personnel to

the status/condition of PSAU fence. According to the results the following are the
positive characteristics of the PSAU fence:

 There is a fence or wall in the premises.

 The fence is well lit at night.

 The fence is patrolled by a security guard at least every two hours.

 There is a budget/fund available for the maintenance and replacement of the

fence.
 29

According to the results, the following are the negative characteristics of

the PSAU fence and need to be improved:

 The height of the fence didn’t meet the minimum required height.

 The wire of the fence/the wall was not in good condition.

 There is no alarm support to the fence (an early warning intrusion detection
alarm).

Table 4: Access Control

Are methods taken to control the movement of

people, vehicles and goods into and out of the f %
school premises?

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Are all the entrances clear of obstructions in

f %
order to provide natural surveillance?

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Are gates closed during school hours? f %

Yes 0 0.00

No 33 100.00

Total 33 100.00

Do you have a security guard placed at the

f %
entrance(s),exit(s) and around the university?

Yes 33 100.00
 30

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00
Are there signs indicating that the premises
f %
are school property?
Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00
Do you have armed response units, policemen
and/or security guards that will respond if an f %
alarm is triggered or if an incident occurs?
Yes 33 100.00
No 0 0.00
Total 33 100.00
Is your school is surrounded by houses and /
f %
or busy roads?
Yes 33 100.00
No 0 0.00
Total 33 100.00

Table 4 shows the perceptions of the thirty-three (33) security personnel to

the access control in the university. According to the results, the following are the
methods implemented to control access to the university:

 There are methods taken to control the movement of people, vehicles and
goods into and out of the school premises.

 All entrances are clear from obstructions.

 There are security guards placed at the entrance(s), exit(s) and around the
university.

 There are signs indicating that the premises are school property.

 There are armed response units, policemen and/or security guards that will
respond if an alarm is triggered or if an incident occurs.
 31

According to the results, the following are need to improve in the access
control of the university:

 Gates are not closed during school hours.

 The university is surrounded by houses and / or busy roads.

Figure 6: PSAU Streetlights Location Map

Figure 6 shows the portion of PSAU campus wherein the streetlights were
located. Lighting is an important consideration in school security because it
provides a level of illumination to clearly identify persons or objects, deter and
detect intrusions or other criminal activity.

As shown in the figure 6, most streetlights were located in the academic

area of the university.
 32

Table 5: Status/Conditions of PSAU Streetlights

Is there lighting on the premises? f %

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Are patrol routes lit up? f %

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Are all vulnerable areas well lit? f %

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Is the access point(s) well lit? (gate and/or

f %
guard post)?

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00
 33

Are the lights protected against damage? f %

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

2.6. Are lights automatically switched on/off? f %

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

2.7. Is there a back-up power supply? f %

Yes 33 100.00

No 0 0.00

Total 33 100.00

Table 5 shows the perceptions of the thirty-three (33) security personnel to

the PSAU street lights(lighting). According to the results the following are the
positive characteristics of the PSAU streetlights:

 There is lighting in the premises.

 Patrol routes are lit up.

 All vulnerable areas are well lit.

 Access point(s) are well lit (gate and/or guard post).

 Lights are protected against damage.

 Lights are automatically switched on/off.

 There is back-up power supply in the premises.

 34

Figure 7: PSAU Security Cameras Location Map

Figure 7 shows the portion of the PSAU campus wherein the exterior
security cameras were located. According to the Industrial Security Management
under Law Enforcement Administration- Philippine Criminology, security cameras
are advancements in security technology that helps make schools safer and
secure today.

At present, there were ten (10) exterior security cameras around the
university; two (2) at main gate, two (2) at gate 2, two (2) at Alias, two (2) at main
road (near VoAg and Neutraceutical), one (1) in FTC Exit, and one (1) in security
office.
 35

Figure 8: PSAU Security Measures Location Map

Figure 8 shows the different security measures of Pampanga State

Agricultural University. As a summary, there are thirty-three (33) security
personnel, two (2) security office, ten (10) security cameras, fences and
streetlights within the university.
 36

The security measures of Pampanga State Agricultural University

in terms of: School Campus ---- University Buildings

Figure 9: Security Measures on University Buildings

Figure 9 shows the security measures available each building in the

university. It contains nine (9) attributes, i.e. name of building, available security
measures (alarms, lighting, emergency lights, door and window locks, window
grills, security cameras) and photos.
 37

Table 6: University Buildings

University Buildings Number of Buildings Surveyed

Academic Buildings 13

University Services Buildings 13

Science and Technology Buildings 13

Residential Buildings 58

Total: 97

Table 6 shows the number of buildings surveyed per group. There are
thirteen (13) academic buildings, thirteen (13) university services buildings,
thirteen (13) science and technology buildings and fifty-eight (58) residential
buildings including the cottages and villas. The buildings under renovation are
not included to the study.
 38

Table 7: Security Measures in the Academic Buildings

Indicators Number of buildings(f) %

Alarms
Have emergency warnings/alarms 5 38%
Alarms are inspected and tested on a regular
5 38%
basis
Lighting
Have emergency lights/back up system 5 38%
Lighting in all entrances, corridors, rooms, and
13 100%
building facade.
Lights are all functional 11 85%
Doors and windows
Have effective door locks 13 100%
Have effective window locks 10 77%
Windows are covered with bulgar bars 13 100%
Security Cameras
Have security cameras 5 38%
All security cameras were functional 5 38%
*Note: Those academic buildings under renovation are not included to the study.

Table 7 shows the different security measures available to the academic

buildings. As shown on the table, 38% of the academic buildings have
emergency warnings/alarms and emergency lights. 100% have lighting at
entrances, corridors and facade, and 85% have fully functional lights. In terms of
doors and windows, 100% have effective door locks, 77% have effective window
 39

locks and 100% have bulgar bars in their windows. Lastly, only 38% have
security cameras

Table 8: Security Measures in University Services Buildings

Indicators Number of buildings(f) %

Alarms
Have emergency warnings/alarms 6 46%
Alarms are inspected and tested on a regular 6 46%
basis
Lighting
Have emergency lights/back up system 6 46%
Lighting in all entrances, corridors, rooms, and 11 85%
building facade.
Lights are all functional 10 77%
Doors and windows
Have effective door locks 13 100%
Have effective window locks 11 85%
Windows are covered with bulgar bars 5 38%
Security Cameras
Have security cameras 6 46%
All security cameras were functional 6 46%
*Note: Those university services buildings under renovation are not included to the
study.

Table 8 shows the different security measures available to the university

services buildings. As shown on the table, 46% have emergency
warnings/alarms and emergency lights. 85% have lighting at entrances, corridors
and facade, and 77% have fully functional lights. In terms of doors and windows,
100% have effective door locks, 85% have effective window locks and 38% have
bulgar bars in their windows. Lastly, 46% have security cameras.

Table 9: Security Measures in the Science & Technology Buildings

 40

Indicators Number of buildings(f) %

Alarms
Have emergency warnings/alarms 0 0%
Alarms are inspected and tested on a regular 0 0%
basis
Lighting
Have emergency lights/back up system 1 8%
Lighting in all entrances, corridors, rooms, and 10 77%
building facade.
Lights are all functional 9 69%
Doors and windows
Have effective door locks 9 69%
Have effective window locks 10 77%
Windows are covered with bulgar bars 7 54%
Security Cameras
Have security cameras 2 15%
All security cameras were functional 2 15%
*Note: Those science and technology buildings under renovation are not included to
the study.

Table 9 shows the different security measures available to the science &
technology buildings. As shown on the table, no buildings have emergency
warnings/alarms, 8% have emergency lights, 77% have lighting at entrances,
corridors and facade, and 69% have fully functional lights. In terms of doors and
windows, 69% have effective door locks, 77% have effective window locks and
54% have bulgar bars in their windows. Lastly, 15% have security cameras.

Table 10: Security Measures to the Residential Buildings

Indicators Number of buildings(f) %

Alarms

Have emergency warnings/alarms 4 7%

Alarms are inspected and tested on a regular 4 7%
 41

basis

Lighting
Have emergency lights/back up system 8 14%
Lighting in all entrances, corridors, rooms, and 58 100%
building facade.
Lights are all functional 56 97%
Doors and windows
Have effective door locks 58 100%
Have effective window locks 54 93%
Windows are covered with bulgar bars 36 62%
Security Cameras
Have security cameras 3 5%
All security cameras were functional 3 15%

Table 10 shows the different security measures available to the residential

buildings, cottages and villas. As shown on the table, 7% have emergency
warnings/alarms, 14% have emergency lights, 100% have lighting at entrances,
corridors and facade, and 97% have fully functional lights. In terms of doors and
windows, 100% have effective door locks, 93% have effective window locks and
62% have bulgar bars in their windows. Lastly, only 5% have security cameras.

Table 11: Summary of the Security Measures in the University Buildings

Indicators Number of buildings(f) %

Alarms
Have emergency warnings/alarms 15 15.46%
Alarms are inspected and tested on a regular 15 15.46%
basis
Lighting
Have emergency lights/back up system 20 20.62%
 42

Lighting in all entrances, corridors, rooms, and 92 94.85%

building facade.
Lights are all functional 86 88.66%
Doors and windows
Have effective door locks 93 95.88%
Have effective window locks 85 87.63%
Windows are covered with bulgar bars 61 62.89%
Security Cameras
Have security cameras 16 16.49%
All security cameras were functional 16 16.49%

Table 11 shows the overall percentage of the available security measures

to the University Buildings. As shown on the table, 15.46% or 15 out of 97
buildings of the university have emergency warnings/alarms. 20.62% or 20 out of
97 buildings of the university have emergency lights/backup systems. 94.85% or
92 out of 97 buildings of the university have lights in all entrances, corridors,
rooms, and building facade. 88.66% or 86 out of 97 buildings of the university
have fully functional lights. 95.88% or 93 out of 97 buildings of the university
have effective door locks. 87.63% or 85 out of 97 buildings of the university have
effective window locks. 62.89% or 61 out of 97 buildings of the university have
bulgar bars in their windows. Lastly, 16.49% or 16 out of 97 buildings of the
university have security cameras.

According to the results, the following security measures are in place at

most of the University buildings (50% and more):

 Lighting in all entrances, corridors, rooms, and building facade

 Lights are all functional

 Effective door locks

 Effective window locks

 43

 Windows are covered with bulgar bars

The following security measures are not available at most of the University
Buildings (49% or less):

 Emergency warnings/alarms

 Emergency lights/backup systems

 Security cameras

The security measures of Pampanga State Agricultural University

in terms of: SECURITY PERSONNEL

Table 12: Perceptions of the Students and Employees towards the Duties
and Responsibilities of Security Personnel

Total Weighted Verbal

Statement/ Question
Respondents Mean Interpretation
1. Records visitors in the log-sheet and
98 3.22 Agree
issuance of Visitor’s ID
2. Inspects and imposes proper
wearing of IDs(for both students,
98 3.47 Strongly Agree
faculty, on-teaching staff, construction
workers and PSAU TODA
3. Inspects and implements proper
wearing of uniform(except those with 98 3.44 Strongly Agree
approved letter)
 44

4. Prevents wearing of sando and

slippers among drivers(motorcycles 98 3.36 Strongly Agree
and tricycles)
5. Checks registry vehicle stickers 98 3.40 Strongly Agree
6. Prevents noisy vehicles entering
98 3.22 Agree
inside the campus
7. Observes proper loading and
98 3.30 Strongly Agree
unloading of vehicles
8. Checks, records, and controls illegal
98 3.19 Agree
vendors in entering the campus
9. Prevents illegal entry, illegal parking,
98 3.28 Strongly Agree
over speeding and overloading
10. Prevents illegal parking along the
road in front of Graduate School 98 3.19 Agree
Building going to Ayala
11. Maintains cleanliness at the
98 3.26 Strongly Agree
guardhouse
12. Conducts inspection of buildings
98 3.35 Strongly Agree
within the area of responsibility
13. Prevents illegal gambling and
assembly, act of lasciviousness,
98 3.36 Strongly Agree
littering, bullying and drinking
intoxicating liquor
14. Strict implements NO Smoking
98 3.24 Agree
Policy
15. Observes and assists pedestrians
98 3.33 Strongly Agree
along the road when necessary
16. Maintains peace and order within
98 3.39 Strongly Agree
the area of responsibility
17. Maintains traffic rules and
98 3.41 Strongly Agree
regulation
18. Prevents littering, sitting on plant
boxes, vandalism, act of
98 3.28 Strongly Agree
lasciviousness, picking of fruits and
illegal gambling.
19. Maintains orderliness in the parking
98 3.29 Strongly Agree
area
20. Monitors the cleanliness of the
98 3.27 Strongly Agree
students’ centers
21. Assist students, employees and
98 3.48 Strongly Agree
visitors as needs arise
22. Conducts roving patrol to all
buildings covered within the area of 98 3.37 Strongly Agree
responsibility
23. Report immediately untoward 98 3.30 Strongly Agree
 45

incident to the Shift-in-charge

24. Prevents students to stay inside the
campus beyond 6:00 PM or employees
to conduct overtime inside the office 98 3.36 Strongly Agree
beyond 5:00 PM without any approved
letter from he higher authority
25. Security hotlines are available
anytime for students and employees of 98 3.20 Agree
the university
26. Observes unloading zone in front of
98 3.24 Agree
Graduate School
Strongly
AVERAGE 98 3.31
Agree

Table 12 shows the perceptions of the students and employees towards

the duties and responsibilities of the security personnel of Pampanga State
Agricultural University. The average mean is 3.31 with a verbal interpretation of
“Strongly Agree”. The researcher concluded that the students and employees are
strongly agree that the security personnel were doing their duties and
responsibilities in the university.

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED NEIGHBORHOOD MAP OF

PAMPANGA STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERISTY
 46

Figure 10: Neighborhood Map of Pampanga State Agricultural University

Figure 10 shows the neighboring areas of Pampanga State Agricultural

University; Barangay San Agustin, Barangay San Vicente, Barangay Ayala, and
the lower portion of Mt. Arayat.

The researcher observed and marked the different assets located from the
boundary of PSAU up to 500 meters away from it. The identified assets are
houses, schools, churches, farm lands, trees, retail stores, boarding houses,
sidecar business, poultry and live stocks, aviary, computer shops, food stalls,
gasoline stations and resorts.
47
 48

Figure 11: Portion of Barangay San Agustin Map

Figure 11 shows the portion of Brgy. San Agustin that was included to the
500 meter- neighborhood map of PSAU. Houses and different establishments
like boarding houses, food stalls, retail stores, and computer shops were
commonly found in this area. There are also farm lands, poultry, and churches.
 49

Figure 12: Portion of Barangay San Vicente Map

Figure 12 shows the portion of Brgy. San Vicente that was included to the
500 meter- neighborhood map of PSAU. Houses, farm lands, trees and resorts
were commonly found in this area.
 50

Figure 12: Lower Portion of Mt. Arayat Map

Figure 13 shows the lower portion of Mt. Arayat that was included to the
500 meter- neighborhood map of PSAU. Trees are commonly found in this area
because it was the lower part of Mt. Arayat. There are also few houses, farm
lands and resorts. Gintung Pakpak Eco Park was also located in this area.
 51

Figure 14. Portion of Barangay Ayala Map

Figure 1 shows the portion of Brgy. Ayala that was included to the 500
meter- neighborhood map of PSAU. Houses, trees and resorts are commonly
found in this area. There are also farm lands and poultries.

Chapter V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter discusses the summary, conclusions and recommendations

based on the results of the study.

Summary

This study entitled ― Geographic Information System based Security

Management of Pampanga State Agricultural University was conducted to
assess the existing security management of Pampanga State Agricultural
University. It aimed to identify the locations of the security posts and offices, the
security measures of the university in terms of school campus and security
personnel and to determine if there is an existing security map of the university.
This study is a descriptive study research which utilized two questionnaires as
 52

the main tool. The first questionnaire was used to determine the security
measures available in school campus specifically in exterior premises and
university buildings. The second questionnaire was used to determine the
perceptions of the students and employees to the duties and responsibilities of
the security personnel of the university.

Conclusions

Based on the results of the study, the following conclusions are drawn:

1. There are existing security measures being implemented by the university.

2. Fences, streetlights and security cameras are available within the exterior and
interior premises of the university. However, the fence is not covering the whole
boundary of the university and there are areas in the university that have no
streetlights and security cameras.

3. Students and employees are “strongly agree” that the security personnel
were doing their duties and responsibilities in the university.

Recommendations

The following recommendations are hereby forwarded:

1. The PSAU Administration may reevaluate their security management for

improvement to connect more effectively to the campus surroundings to fully
satisfy the results.

2. It is recommended to allot funds for fencing, streetlights and installation of

security cameras around the university.

3. Integrate Geographic Information System in the security management of the

university for excellent visualization of the security measures of the university
and analysis for future planning.
 53

4. The develop Geographic Information System based security maps should be

recommended to the Administration for possible considerations and integration in
their security management.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Michael Hudson. “Managing Security Risks in Schools: A Practitioner's View”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240002, July 1999

Emily E. Tanner-Smith. “Visible School Security Measures and Student

Academic Performance, Attendance, and Postsecondary Aspirations” from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556165.pdf, 2015

Kenneth C. Stuker.“Student perceptions of the impact security measures have on

their high school experience” from https://scholarworks. umt.edu/cgi/ view
content.cgi?article=10483&context=etd, 2002
Giovanni Pisapia. “A Case Study Analysis on the Implementation of GIS
Technology for Safety and Security Planning during Major Sport Events”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333827308, December 2015
 54

Isaca. “Performing a Security Risk Assessment”

https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/past
issues/2010/performing-a-security-risk-assessment, January 2010

Dempsey, J.S. 2008. “ Introduction to private security”

https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Private-Security-John
Dempsey/dp/0495809853
LEANDRI VAN JAARSVELD. “AN INVESTIGATION OF SAFETY AND
SECURITY MEASURES AT SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN TSHWANE,
SOUTHAFRICA ”http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/5800/thesis
_jaarsveld_l.pdf?sequence=1, November 2011
Mark Rowh. “ Campus security: Helping the college community using GIS and
IPS” https://universitybusiness.com/campus-security-helping-the-college-
community-using-gis-and-ips/, April 2019
JEROME BARADILLO. “Assessment on CSU Campus Security Services:
Perceptions andPrecautions”
https://www.academia.edu/37757891/Assessment_on_CSU_Campus_Se
curity_Services_Perceptions_and_Precautions, May 2017

Shengwu Duan. “Design and Implementation of Campus Real-Time Monitoring

and Emergency Management System Based on GIS” https://www.atlantis-
press.com/proceedings/scict-14/12813, 2014

Nick Malloy. “Mapping Arcata Lighting Using Kernel Density Model”

https://www.geospatial.institute/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/GSP-370-
Research-Paper-Sample-02.pdf, December 2017

Wilfredo C. Domingo et al. “industrial security management”

https://www.scribd.com/document/421263465/Lea-Industria-lSecurity
Management, 2010

GLÒRIA SERRA COCH. “NEIGHBORHOOD MAPPING AND NEIGHBORHOOD

PLANNING Revealing the relationship in New York City, 1970-2015”
https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/d8-07nw-
w575/download, May 2019
Cresente E. Glariana& Nick John B. Solar. “Status of School Safety and Security
among Elementary Schools in the Fifth Class Municipality”
http://www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/APJMR-2015-
3.5.1.02.pdf, November 2015
55
 56

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A
REQUEST LETTER TO PSAU PRESIDENT
57
58
 59

APPENDIX B
LETTER OF CONTINUATION TO PSAU VPAA
 60

APPENDIX C
LETTER OF CONTINUATION TO CREAM DEAN
 61

APPENDIX D
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
 62

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED SECURITY MANAGEMENT OF

PAMPANGA STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
Security Measures Assessment

Name(optional): ______________________________________________________

I. SCHOOL PREMISES- EXTERIOR

YES NO COMMENTS

1. FENCING
1. Is there a fence/wall surrounding the
1 entire premises?

1. Is the security fence or wall at least 8

2 feet high?

1.
Is the fence well lit at night?
3
1. Is the wire of the fence/the wall still in
4 good condition?

1. Is there alarm support to the fence

5 (an early warning intrusion detection
alarm)?

1. Is the fence patrolled by a security

6 guard (on foot) at least every two
hours?

1. Is there a budget/fund available for

7 the maintenance and replacement of
the fence ?

2. LIGHTING
2.
Is there lighting on the premises?
1
2.
Are patrol routes lit up?
2
2.
Are all vulnerable areas well lit?
3
 63

2. Is the access point(s) well lit? (gate

4 and/or guard post) ?

2. Are the lights protected against

5 damage?

2. Are lights automatically switched

6 on/off?

2.
Is there a back-up power supply?
7
3. ACCESS CONTROL
3. Are methods taken to control the
1 movement of people, vehicles and
goods into and out of the school
premises?

3. Are all the entrances clear of

2 obstructions in order to provide
natural surveillance?

3. Are gates closed during school

3 hours?

3. Do you have a security guard placed

4 at the entrance(s) and around the
university?

3. Are notice boards displayed that

5 indicates what is allowed and what is
not allowed (onto the premises)?

3. Are there signs indicating that the

6 premises are school property?

3. Do you have armed response units,

7 policemen and/or security guards that
will respond if an alarm is triggered or
if an incident occurs?

3. Is your school surrounded by houses

8 and/or busy roads?
 64

Name of Building: ________________________________________________

II. University Buildings
Yes No Comments
1. ALARMS
1. The building has effective emergency
1 warnings/alarms
1. The alarms are inspected and tested on
2 a regular basis (annually or before long
periods of non-operational times, for
e.g. school holidays)?
2. LIGHTING
2. The building has a back-up system
1 (power supply) for emergency lights
2. Lighting in all entrances,corridors,
2 rooms and building facade (especially
during evening)
2. All lights are functional
3
3. DOORS AND WINDOWS
3. Classrooms and offices have effective
1 door locks
3. Windows are covered with burglar bars
2
3. Classrooms and offices have effective
3 window locks.
4. SECURITY CAMERAS
4. Security cameras are available to the
1 building
4. Security cameras are all functional
2
 65

Please specify other security measures available in the building:

________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
___

GEEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM BASED SECURITY MANAGEMENT

OF PAMPANGA STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

Respondent’s Name: __________________________________________________

Position: ____________________________________________________________
Please tell us how much you agree or disagree with the following statements.
Strongly Agree- 4, Agree-3, Disagree-2, Strongly Disagree-1

Strongly Strongly
Statement/ Question Agree Disagree
Agree Disagree
1. Records visitors in the log-
sheet and issuance of Visitor’s
ID
2. Inspects and imposes proper
wearing of IDs(for both students,
faculty, on-teaching staff,
construction workers and PSAU
TODA
3. Inspects and implements
proper wearing of
uniform(except those with
approved letter)
4. Prevents wearing of sando
and slippers among
drivers(motorcycles and
tricycles)
5. Checks registry vehicle
stickers
6. Prevents noisy vehicles
entering inside the campus
7. Observes proper loading and
unloading of vehicles
8. Checks, records, and controls
illegal vendors in entering the
campus
9. Prevents illegal entry, illegal
parking, over speeding and
 66

overloading
10. Prevents illegal parking
along the road in front of
Graduate School Building going
to Ayala
11. Maintains cleanliness at the
guardhouse
12. Conducts inspection of
buildings within the area of
responsibility
13. Prevents illegal gambling
and assembly, act of
lasciviousness, littering, bullying
and drinking intoxicating liquor
14. Strict implements NO
Smoking Policy
15. Observes and assists
pedestrians along the road when
necessary
16. Maintains peace and order
within the area of responsibility
17. Maintains traffic rules and
regulation
18. Prevents littering, sitting on
plant boxes, vandalism, act of
lasciviousness, picking of fruits
and illegal gambling.
19. Maintains orderliness in the
parking area
20. Monitors the cleanliness of
the students’ centers
21. Assist students, employees
and visitors as needs arise
22. Conducts roving patrol to all
buildings covered within the
area of responsibility
23. Report immediately
untoward incident to the Shift-in-
charge
24. Prevents students to stay
inside the campus beyond 6:00
PM or employees to conduct
overtime inside the office
beyond 5:00 PM without any
approved letter from he higher
authority
 67

25. Security hotlines are

available anytime for students
and employees of the university
26. Observes unloading zone in
front of Graduate School
 68

APPENDIX E
SAMPLE RAW DATA OF QUESTIONNAIRES
69
70
 71

APPENDIX F
DOCUMENTATION
72
 73

CURRICULUM VITAE
 74

MARY ANNE GONZALES PEÑA

 #0035 San Jose, Magalang, Pampanga

0906-039-0262
 Email: maryannepena9@gmail.com

PERSONAL INFORMATION
Date of Birth : July 8, 1999
Gender : Female
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Born Again Christian

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

TERTIARY Bachelor of Science in Geodetic Engineering

Pampanga State Agricultural University
PAC, Magalang, Pampanga
2015-2020

SECONDARY Dee Hwa Liong College Foundation

Sapang Maisac, Duquit, Mabalacat , Pampanga
2011-2015

PRIMARY San Jose Elementary School

San Jose, Magalang, Pampanga
2005-2011

ORGANIZATIONS/AFFILIATIONS

4th Year Representative

PSAU- SUPREME ALLIANCE OF GEODETIC ENGINEERING STUDENTS
2018-2019

SAGES SECRETARY
PSAU - SUPREME ALLIANCE OF GEODETIC ENGINEERING STUDENTS
2019-2020
 75

ORGANIZED SEMINARS, CAMPAIGNS AND TRAININGS ATTENDED

Seminar-Workshop on AutoCad with Survey Return Preparation,
PlexEarth Emulator Application and Usage of Geographic Calculator
AutoCad Room, CREAM Bldg.
PSAU, Magalang, Pampanga
July 2016

On-the-Job-Training at Department of Environment and Natural

Resources
Maimpis City of San Fernando, Pampanga
April 2019