Ground Water Regulation in India
Ground Water Regulation in India
Ground Water Regulation in India
Introduction
Recent research has demonstrated that evaporation of groundwater can play a significant role
in the local water cycle, especially in arid regions. Scientists in Saudi Arabia have proposed
plans to recapture and recycle this evaporative moisture for crop irrigation. In the opposite
photo, a 50-centimeter-square reflective carpet, made of small adjacent plastic cones, was
placed in a plant-free dry desert area for five months, without rain or irrigation. It managed to
capture and condense enough ground vapor to bring to life naturally buried seeds underneath
it, with a green area of about 10% of the carpet area. It is expected that, if seeds were put
down before placing this carpet, a much wider area would become green.
Uses of Natural Resources: All natural resources, groundwater is the most extracted
resource in the world. As of 2010, the top five countries by volume of groundwater extraction
were India, China, the US, Pakistan, and Iran. A majority of extracted groundwater, 70%, is
used for agricultural purposes. Groundwater is the most accessed source of freshwater around
the world, including as drinking water, irrigation, and manufacturing. Groundwater accounts
for about half of the world's drinking water, 40% of its irrigation water, and a third of water
for industrial purposes.
Issues: Certain problems have beset the use of groundwater around the world. Just as river
waters have been over-used and polluted in many parts of the world, so too have aquifers.
The big difference is that aquifers are out of sight. The other major problem is that water
management agencies, when calculating the "sustainable yield" of aquifer and river water,
have often counted the same water twice, once in the aquifer, and once in its connected river.
This problem, although understood for centuries, has persisted, partly through inertia within
government agencies. In Australia, for example, prior to the statutory reforms initiated by
the Council of Australian Governments water reform framework in the 1990s, many
Australian states managed groundwater and surface water through separate government
agencies, an approach beset by rivalry and poor communication.
In general, the time lags inherent in the dynamic response of groundwater to development
have been ignored by water management agencies, decades after scientific understanding of
the issue was consolidated. In brief, the effects of groundwater overdraft (although
undeniably real) may take decades or centuries to manifest themselves. In a classic study in
1982, Bredehoeft and colleagues modeled a situation where groundwater extraction in an
intermontane basin withdrew the entire annual recharge, leaving ‘nothing’ for the natural
groundwater-dependent vegetation community. Even when the bore field was situated close
to the vegetation, 30% of the original vegetation demand could still be met by the lag
inherent in the system after 100 years. By year 500, this had reduced to 0%, signalling
complete death of the groundwater-dependent vegetation. The science has been available to
make these calculations for decades; however, in general water management agencies have
ignored effects that will appear outside the rough timeframe of political elections (3 to 5
years). Marios Sophocleous argued strongly that management agencies must define and use
appropriate timeframes in groundwater planning. This will mean calculating groundwater
withdrawal permits based on predicted effects decades, sometimes centuries in the future.
As water moves through the landscape, it collects soluble salts, mainly sodium chloride.
Where such water enters the atmosphere through evapotranspiration, these salts are left
behind. In irrigation districts, poor drainage of soils and surface aquifers can result in water
tables' coming to the surface in low-lying areas. Major land degradation problems of soil
salinity and waterlogging result, combined with increasing levels of salt in surface waters. As
a consequence, major damage has occurred to local economies and environments.
Four important effects are worthy of brief mention. First, flood mitigation schemes, intended
to protect infrastructure built on floodplains, have had the unintended consequence of
reducing aquifer recharge associated with natural flooding. Second, prolonged depletion of
groundwater in extensive aquifers can result in land subsidence, with associated infrastructure
damage – as well as, third, saline intrusion. Fourth, draining acid sulphate soils, often found
in low-lying coastal plains, can result in acidification and pollution of formerly freshwater
and estuarine streams.
Another cause for concern is that groundwater drawdown from over-allocated aquifers has
the potential to cause severe damage