Simufact Additive - Simulation
Simufact Additive - Simulation
Simufact Additive - Simulation
Intermediate approaches combining the advantages of reasonable analysis times and the desired
level of detail
Hatching model, e.g. with inherent strain or thermal cycle
Microscopic approach (upcoming versions)
CALCULATIONS METHODS
Scaled calculation methods for more flexibility
Simufact Additive offers several calculation methods:
1. Mechanical
2. Thermal
3. Thermo-mechanical coupled
1. Mechanical Calculation Method
Additive manufacturing processes with metals are always complex time-dependent thermo-mechanical
processes that require a correspondingly high simulation effort. In order to achieve practical results more
quickly, we transferred the "inherent strain" method to additive production in the powder bed when
developing the software.
The method of the inherent strains originates from welding technology and should also be used here to
simplify and accelerate the calculation of complex welding processes. The basic idea behind this is that the
complex thermo-mechanical history of the process ultimately introduces a typical non-elastic (i.e. non-
reducing) strain into the component, the so-called inherent strain. If this strain is now known, the time-
consuming time-dependent thermo-mechanical calculation can be omitted and the purely mechanical
calculation is much faster.
This method has been proven to achieve excellent results in terms of distortion behaviour and also loading
due to internal stresses. It is, therefore, the first choice for achieving practical results quickly, i.e. within
minutes or a few hours.
Calibration with Cantilever
The challenge of the mechanical method is now to achieve the typical inherent elongations of the process
under consideration as elegantly as possible, i.e. quickly and reliably. One possibility would be to determine
this again by a small-scale simulation of the exposure process. In addition to the time required, however,
there are considerable uncertainties regarding the possible result quality, since the nominal but not the actual
conditions of the real process are fully known and can also fluctuate. The calibration of the inherent strains
on test specimens has therefore proven to be the best approach. No simulation, however good, can
completely replace the result of a physical test.
A fast optimization algorithm calibrates the inherent strain values so that they lead to the deformations
measured in the test in the simulation. These strain values represent the (individual) machine used, the
material and also the process parameters used. This enables reliable and fast simulation even for complex
additive components.