Forensic Structural Engineering - Zeulenroda Bridge

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

FORENSIC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

CASE STUDIES
CASE N° 38
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE

MARTIN POLIMENI
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
EEPP SA
eeppsaingenieria@gmail.com
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE COLLAPSE
On August 13, 1973, the Zeulenroda bridge in Germany collapsed during
the erection process.
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE COLLAPSE
Principal causes:
• Buckling or the bottom flange
due to cantilever erection
process loads.
Consequences:
o 4 people dead and 5 injured.
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE COLLAPSE

Principal structural system:


6 spans. Main length: 63 m
Single-cell six-span
continuous welded steel box-
girder bridge. B = 11.1 m x H
= 2.1 m
Upper flange: U shape
stiffeners.
Bottom flange and webs: flat
shape stiffeners.
Cantilever erection process.
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE COLLAPSE
Stiffeners. Upper flange:
U shape stiffener with
enough lateral inertia to
resist the service loads.

Bottom flange: Flat


stiffeners. These stiffeners
were not able to resist the
compression loads due to
the erection process.
Incorrect structural design.
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE COLLAPSE

Cantilever erection process with temporary supports. The structure


collapsed during the erection process, before reaching the temporary
support due to the buckling of the bottom flange.
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE COLLAPSE

Flat stiffeners didn’t have enough lateral inertia. L or T shapes would have been
more desirable stiffeners types.
ZEULENRODA BRIDGE COLLAPSE
Lessons learned:
 Not formal forensic investigation was performed and the collapse was
hidden for several years.
 Nevertheless, the main cause of the collapse was later determined.
Once again, like many other collapses that happened in the earlies
70’s, the bottom flange of the steel box girder locally buckled due to
the cantilevering erection process loads.
 It is probable that an incorrect peer review was carried out.
 Flat stiffeners didn’t have enough inertia to resist the compression
loads and then, all the bottom flange buckled producing a fatal hinge.
 This collapse was similar to others bridge collapses due to buckling
at incorrect constructive detail (insufficient lateral inertia of the
bottom stiffeners) during a cantilever erection method.
 Like other collapses, the Zeulenroda bridge collapse happened at the
beginning of the 70’s, but was hidden for several years. As a result,
the lessons that the collapse left could not be used to improve the
engineering practice.

You might also like