Bottled Water Industry: Business Policy
Bottled Water Industry: Business Policy
Bottled Water Industry: Business Policy
Business Policy
However, few are able to do so selling a product or service that is of equal or lesser quality than
the alternative. The bottled water industry has managed to do so for many years and in many
instances by merely bottling the same thing it the companies claim its product is a healthier
substitute for. It is only in recent years that the public’s eyes have been opened to the fact that
due to chemicals bottled water causes more health risks than tap water with a significantly higher
price tag. There is no sensible reason to choose bottled water over tap water.
produced by Michael and Michelle Walrath. After several hours of research, this accusation has
been found to be unfortunately accurate. The FDA is assigned the task of monitoring the quality
and safety of all bottled water in the United States (Tapped 2010). The EPA is assigned the
greater task of monitoring municipal tap services throughout the country (EPA.gov 2010). The
problem with the FDA regulating bottled water is one person is in charge of overseeing the entire
industry. In contrast, the EPA legally requires every state to regulate its own municipal water
sources, proving to be a more effective delegation of authority. But since bottled water is
considered a “food” product, the FDA has the legal jurisdiction, even though 40 percent of
bottled water is filtered or unfiltered tap water. The FDA requires microbiological testing of
bottled water samples to occur a minimum of once per week and chemical/radiological testing
merely once a year. In these tests, specified contaminants are restricted from exceeding MCL’s
The bottled water industry took flight in the U.S. in 1976, when Perrier, a Nestle brand of
sparkling water, was introduced to an affluent white-collar market. This new demand for bottled
water lead to the production of competitive water brands by major corporations like Coca-Cola
and Pepsi Co. From 2004 to 2009, the United States experienced a 4.4 percent compound annual
growth rate of bottled water sales which is quite remarkable considering the 2009 volume
production of bottled water fell by 12.5 percent in the United States (Rodwan 2009). The appeal
of the bottled water industry is noted in key figures of the financials; sales $2,898,641, Net Profit
after Tax $182,614 (Industry norms 2009). These figures are in the thousands of dollars.
With the criticism this industry has been facing, major issues need to be addressed. The
realization that bottled water is not safer than tap water has seriously altered the consumers’
views. Because of this shift in opinion, many major cities have banned bottled water; including
San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Chicago and many others (bottledwaterblues.com).
Perhaps the most crucial of issues the bottled water industry faces are the chemicals emitted from
the bottles into the water they contain and the rate of pollution which stands at 60 million bottles
per day. As this information continues to spread, more of the public will realize that “There is no
logical explanation for regular bottled water use: It costs more, offers less and pollutes our planet
Bottled water is poorly regulated by the government, poses serious health risks from toxic
chemicals used in bottles, is very costly and contributes greatly to the global pollution problem.
Despite these facts the bottled water industry is very successful and even though it has seen a
decline across the globe of the past several years, it is predicted to become a $65 billion industry
by 2012. Something needs to be done to stop the large profits made by this industry.