Learning Styles and Inventories Teacher Resource: 1. Perceptual Modality Descriptions

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Learning Styles and Inventories Teacher Resource

A learning style is a student's consistent way of responding to and using stimuli in the context of
learning. Keefe (1979) defines learning styles as the "composite of characteristic cognitive, affective,
and physiological factors that serve as relatively stable indicators of how a learner perceives, interacts
with, and responds to the learning environment.” Stewart and Felicetti (1992) define learning styles as
those "educational conditions under which a student is most likely to learn.” Thus, learning styles are
not really concerned with "what" learners learn, but rather "how" they prefer to learn.

Three Schools of Learning Styles

Learning styles come from three schools of thought: Perceptual Modality, Information Processing, and
Personality Patterns (Conner, Marcia & Hodgins, Wayne, 2000).

1. Perceptual Modality examines the primary way our bodies take in information through our
senses, such as auditory, visual, smell, kinesthetic, and tactile. Those perceptions deeply affect
our ability to learn. Whether you tend to rely more or less on one sense than another has a
tremendous influence on how you interpret new experiences and succeed in whatever you work
with each day. VAK is one of these styles and does not really worry about the why of learning
styles.
2. Information Processing distinguishes between the way we think, solve problems, and
remember. This may be thought of as the way our brain processes information. The first part of
Kolb's Learning Style Inventory in which he describes the process of learning is perhaps the best
example.

3. Personality Models are the way we interact with our surroundings. Each of us has a preferred,
consistent, distinct way of perceiving, organizing, and retaining information. This is due to the
way we were brought up (environment or nurture) and the genes (DNA or nature) within us.
This may be thought of as the ego within us, or what makes us what we are. The Four
Temperaments, Myers Briggs MBTI, Keirsey, DISC, and Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences
are examples.

1. Perceptual Modality Descriptions

Your Learning Style http://www.neable. org/resources/instructional-material/overview/


ESOL or beginning literacy inventory that uses “see, hear, feel” words and pictures. A quick
instrument which takes approximately 10-15 minutes to complete.  Three learning styles will
be tested - visual, auditory, and kinesthetic.

Barsch Inventory Online http://ww2.nscc.edu/gerth_d/AAA0000000/barsch_inventory.htm


Paper Copy http://medicine.utah.edu/learningresources/tools/styles/barsch_inventor.pdf
This popular inventory is an informal, self-reporting instrument that provides student s with an
indication of the relative strengths and weaknesses in learning through different sensory
modalities: auditory, visual, tactile,

VARK http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index. asp


Stands for visual, auditory, read/write, and kinesthetic; also known as the VAK (visual, auditory,

1
kinesthetic) or the VAKT (visual auditory, kinesthetic, tactile). This site contains a learning style
inventory as well as a good deal of explanatory information and help sheets that provide study
strategies to complement the style. One of the most popular models nowadays due to its
simplicity, however, its main weakness is that the research does not support it - probably
because it is more of a preference than a style.

Learning Style Inventory http://ttc.coe.uga.edu/surveys/LearningStyleInv. html


Tactile, visual, auditory results with learning strengths, teaching strategies and
technology. Can also be found online through Ohio's New Staff Orientation.

2. Information Processing

Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire (ILS) http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html


Richard E. Felder and Linda Silverman formulated a learning styles model that presents a hybrid
of personality and information processing models. Their model asks learners to identify
preferences on four dimensions (active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, visual/verbal, and
sequential/global). The Solomon and Felder instrument contains 44 questions and can be
found at North Carolina State University.

Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI) can be purchased at http://www.learningfromexperience. com,


download for a fee.
A simple self-description test, based on experiential learning theory, which is designed to
measure
an individual’s preferences and needs regarding the learning process. David Kolb's Learning
Style Model classifies learners as having a preference for 1) concrete experience or abstract
conceptualization (how they take information in), and 2) active experimentation or reflective
observation (how they internalize information). The resulting learning styles are combinations
of the individual’s preferred approaches. These learning styles are as follows: Converger,
Diverger, Assimilator, and Accommodator

Honey & Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) can be purchased at http://www.peterhoney.
com/ for a fee.
There are two versions of the LSQ, an 80-item and 40-item assessment that finds the learners
preferred ways of learning

The Learning Style Survey http://www.skagitwatershed.org/~donclark/hrd/styles/learn_style_survey.


html
While basically the same as Kolb's model, there are a couple of differences. First, they
substitute the terms "reflector" for divergers (reflective observation), "theorist" for assimilators
(abstract conceptualization), "pragmatist" for convergers (concrete experience), and "activist"
for accommodators (active experimentation). In addition, the new labels have slightly different
meanings. They also postulate that people prefer different methods of learning, depending
upon the situation and their experience level.

3. Personality Models Descriptions

Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI) http://www.oswego.edu/plsi/

2
A self-administered survey for ages 9-adult that provides a very reliable indication of learning
style and cognitive preference. It uses the four Jungian dimensions (i. e, introversion/
extroversion, intuition/sensation, thinking/feeling, and judging/perceiving) that are also used by
the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Murphy Meisgeir Type Indicator, and the Keirsey-Bates
Temperament Sorter. This site provides the 48-item general version. To obtain both the 52-
item revised student or 52-item adult versions, please select the order link
http://www.alstatela.edu/faculty/jshindl/plsi/order.htm and follow the directions.

Jung Typology Test http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2. asp


A Meyers Briggs type inventory. After completing the inventory, you will receive your type
formula according to Carl Jung and Isabel Myers-Briggs typology along with the strengths of the
preferences and identifies 16 personality styles based on introvert/extrovert, sensors/intuitors,
thinkers/feelers, and judgers/perceivers.

Birmingham Grid for Learning (BGfl) Multiple Intelligences Test


http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/resources_ftp/client_ftp/ks3/ict/multiple_int/questions/choose_lang.
cfm
An explanation of the eight multiple intelligences are provided along with the online test that is
offered in multiple languages. Students can print the intelligences wheel and the unique
number printed on the sheet will allow students to re-visit their wheel at any time. Individual
and class results are also available.

Multiple Intelligences for Adult Literacy and Education http://literacyworks.org/mi/intro/index.html


An introduction to Multiple Intelligences (MI) and an online assessment are provided.
Especially helpful is a Practice section with suggestions for approaching subjects in different
ways to take advantage of different intelligences. Can also be found online through Ohio's New
Staff Orientation.

The Rogers Indicator of Multiple Intelligences


http://www.personal.psu.du/staff/b/x/bxb11/MI/MIQuiz.htm
The 49-item inventory provides results, but another valuable resource can be found at the
Multiple Intelligence site http://www. personal.psu.edu/staff/b/x/bxb11/MI/index.htm; offering
educators, instructors, and anyone who wants to learn the basics about Multiple Intelligences
Theory valuable information.

Multiple Intelligence Inventory http://www.ldrc.ca/projects/miinventory/miinventory.php


A free 80-question inventory based on eight of Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences.

Having your students do one of these might provide information for them on effective learning
strategies as well as provide you with information on effective teaching strategies. You might also find it
helpful to do one or more of these yourself as it might give you information about your preferred
learning style (and therefore preferred teaching style).

The literature basically indicates that there is wide acceptance of the concept of learning styles,
however, there is disagreement on how to best measure learning styles (Coffield, et. al. , 2004). Most
researchers agree that we do have various learning styles and preferences, however, the research tends
to agree that it is relative unimportant as it is far more important to match the presentation with the

3
nature of the subject, such as providing correct learning methods, strategies, and context; than
matching individual preferences (Coffield, 2004). For example, in a large meta-study, Marzano (1998)
found that graphic and tactile representations of the subject matter had noticeable effects on learning
outcomes, regardless of any attempt to match them with learners' modalities. Perhaps David Merrill
(2000) has the best philosophy for using learning styles -- instructional strategies should first be
determined on the basis of the type of content to be taught or the goals of the instruction and
secondarily, learner styles and preferences are then used to adjust or fine-tune these fundamental
learning strategies.

References

Coffield, F. , Moseley, D. , Hall, E. , & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16
learning: A systematic and critical review. www. LSRC. ac.uk: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Retrieved March 9, 2010: http://www.lsda. org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf.

Conner, Marcia & Hodgins, Wayne (September 14, 2000). Learning Styles. Retrieved March 9, 2010:
http://www.learnativity.com/learningstyles.html.

Keefe, J. W. (1979) Learning style: An overview. In NASSP's Student learning styles: Diagnosing and
proscribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA. National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Kolb, David A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development.
Prentice-Hall, Inc. , Englewood Cliffs, N. J

Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Mid-continent Regional


Educational Laboratory, Aurora, CO.

Merrill, D. (2000). Instructional Strategies and Learning Styles: Which takes Precedence? In Robert
Reiser and Jack Dempsey (Eds. ) Trends and Issues in Instructional Technology. Prentice Hall.

Stewart, K. L. , & Felicetti, L. A. (1992). Learning styles of marketing majors. Educational Research
Quarterly, 15(2), 15-23.

You might also like