Educ 75 Module 5
Educ 75 Module 5
Educ 75 Module 5
Learning Outcomes:
1. Construct a scoring rubric – analytic and holistic
2. Explain the implication of multiple intelligences to assessment
INTRODUCTION
Modern assessment methods tend to use rubrics to describe student performance. A
rubric is a scoring method that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” (for
example, purpose, organization, details, voice, and mechanics are often what count in a piece
of writing); it also articulates gradations of quality for each criterion, from excellent to poor.
Perkins et al (1994) provide an example of rubrics scoring for student inventions and lists the
criteria and gradations of quality for verbal, written, or graphic reports on student inventions.
This is shown in the succeeding figure as a prototype of rubric scoring.
There are many reasons for the seeming popularity of rubrics in the Philippine school
system. First, they are very useful tools for both teaching and evaluation of learning outcomes.
Rubrics have the potential to improve student performance, as well as monitor it, by clarifying
teachers’ expectations.
Secondly, rubrics seem to allow students to acquire wisdom in judging and evaluating
the quality of their own work in relation to the quality of the work of other students. In several
experiments involving the use of rubrics, students progressively became more aware of the
problem associated with their solution to a problem and with the problems inherit in the
solutions of other students. In other words, rubrics increase the students’ sense of responsibility
and accountability.
Third, rubrics are quite efficient and tend to require less time for the teachers in
evaluating student performance. Teachers tend to find that by the time a piece has been self –
and peer – assessed according to a rubric, they have little left to say about it. When they do
have something to say, they can often simply circle an item in the rubric, rather than struggling
to explain the flaw or strength they have noticed and figuring out what to suggest in terms of
improvements. Rubrics provide students with more informative feedback about their strengths
and areas in need of improvement.
Finally, it is easy to understand and construct a rubric scoring guide. Most of the items
found in the rubrics scoring guide are self-explanatory and require no further help from outside
experts.
SCORING RUBRICS
CREATING RUBRICS
In designing a rubric scoring guide, the students need to be actively involved in the
process. The following steps are suggested in creating a rubric:
Perhaps the most difficult challenge is to use clear, precise, and concise language. Terms
like “creative”’ “innovative”, and other vague terms need to be avoided. If a rubric is to teach as
well as evaluate, terms like these must be defined for students. Instead of these words, try
words that can convey ideas, and which can be readily observed.
Rubrics are scales that differentiate levels of student performance. They contain the
criteria that must be met by the students and the judgment process that will be used to rate
how well the student has performed. An exemplar is an example that delineates the desired
characteristics of quality in ways students can understand. These are important parts in the
assessment process.
Well-designed rubrics include:
● performance dimensions that are critical to successful task completion;
● criteria that reflect all the important outcomes of the performance task;
● a rating scale that provides a usable, easily-interpreted score;
● criteria that reflect concrete references, in clear language understandable to students,
parent, and other teachers, and others.
Learners have multiple intelligences and varied learning styles. Students must be given
the opportunity to demonstrate learning that is aligned to their multiple intelligences and to
their learning styles. It is good for teachers to consider the multiple intelligences of learners to
enable learners to demonstrate learning in a manner which makes them feel comfortable and
successful. Teachers truly consider learners’ multiple intelligences when they make use of a
variety of assessment tools and tasks.
Here are assessment practices lifted from DepEd Order 8, s. 2015 for the guidance of all
teachers:
1. Teachers should employ assessment methods that are consistent with standards.
This means that assessment as a process must be based on standards and
competencies that are stated in the K to 12 Curriculum Guide. Assessment must be
based NOT on content but on standards and competencies. Therefore, there must be
alignment between assessment tools or tasks and standards and competencies.
“Sa klaseng ito, matututo tayo, kahit magkakalayo!”
2. Teachers must employ both formative and summative assessment both individually
and collaboratively. Assessment is done primarily to ensure learning; thus teachers
are expected to assess learning in every stage of lesson development – beginning,
middle and at the end.
3. Grades are a function of written work, performance tasks and quarterly test. This
means that grades come from multiple sources with emphasis on performance tasks
from Grades 1 to 12. Grade does not come from only one source rather from
multiple sources.
4. The cognitive process dimensions given by L=Krathwohl and Anderson (2001) - from
remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating –
governs formulation of assessment tasks
ACTIVITY