Selecting Boars 2021
Selecting Boars 2021
Selecting Boars 2021
Litter size at 15 On the average, a sow will have consumed a total of ¾ to 1 ton of feed
birth during the period between breeding and the date her liter is weaned.
Thus, if the quantity of feed must be charged against a liter of 4 or 5
pigs, the chance of eventual profit is small.
Daily rate of 30 Daily rate of gain from wearing to marketing is important because: [1] it
gain from is highly correlated with efficiency of gain; [2] it makes for a shorter time
weaning to in reaching market weight and condition, thus effecting a saving in labor,
marketing making for less exposure to risk and disease, and allowing for a more
rapid turnover in capital. Rate of gain and lardiness may be correlated to
some degree. Thus, one should not let this be the only factor upon
which selection is based.
Efficiency of feed 30 Where convenient, accurate litter feed records should
utilization be kept, for the most profitable animals generally
require less feed to make 45kgs. Of gain.
b. Backfat thickness 50 The probe, lean meter, or ultrasonic equipment can be used to
measure backfat thickness on prospective breeding animals
c. Lin lean area
50 Loin area is an indication of muscling or red meat
d. Percent ham,
based on carcass 58 Ham is a highly-priced cut; hence the aim is to get a large ham
weight as possible
Where:
ADG – Average Daily Gain
FCR – Feed Conversion Ratio
BF - Backfat
CULLING
• Culling is the removal of unwanted animals in the herd. It requires
intelligent and careful evaluation of every individual’s merit of
performance.
• The more rigid the culling, the more rapid will be the improvement in
the performance of the herd.
• The intensity of culling varies from farm to farm depending on the
goals of the individual producer and availability of superior
replacement animals.
• In a herd, it is common to cull at a rate of 30 to 40 percent
• An important and neglected area of planning is the stage of sow
removal from the herd.
• Once the decision to cull a sow has been taken, it rarely pays to retain
her in order to gain extra weight before marketing. Thus, once her
udder has returned to normal and selling is convenient, she is best
removed form the herd to make way for a more productive sow.
Therefore, the best time to cull a sow is after weaning.
• Although it is a common practice of swine producers to keep boars
and sows as long as they are productive, culling them on the basis of
their physical and reproductive capabilities of improving the
production efficiency of the herd is more realistic.
Planned and unplanned
culling
• Culling should be planned to give a property regulated herd
age and standards adopted, so that pigs of below average
performance or difficult temperament are removed.
However, culling must never be considered independently of
gilt replacement availability.
• As already mentioned, culling requires wise and careful
evaluation of every sow’s performance.
• The more rigid the culling, the more rapid will be the
improvement in the performance of the herd. The intensity
of culling varies farm to farm depending on the goals of the
individual producer and the availability of superior
replacement animals
• Very few of the reasons for removing sows from a herd can really be
said to be completely predictable in advance. We may know that an
estimated number of replacement gilts would be required, but it is
less easy to forecast the exact timing of such a requirement
• Results of a survey showed that only culling by age can be really said
to be predictable in advance (Meat and Livestock Commission, Great
Britain). All the rest are said to be unpredictable.
• According to the study, the proportion of the sow culled after service
totals at least 47% of the reasons for removal from the herd.
• “Not in – pig” accounts for 17%, failure to conceive for 12%, abortion
for 6% and lameness about 12%.
• In commercial farms, sows are kept as long as they produce large
number of rapid growing pigs. A fast turnover of sows will, however,
increase the rate of genetic changes which then provide potential
improvement.
• Table shows that if sows are kept for five or six litters, around 40%
must still be replaced each year. This rate would still be higher for
breeding stock producers.
Letter per Sow Years in Herd based Annual Replacement
on 155 days Rate(%)
farrowing interval
3 1.27 79
4 1.70 59
5 2.13 47
6 2.55 39
7 2.98 33
(acceptable average)
8 3.40 29
9 3.83 26
10 4.25 23
Pointers in Culling Boars and gilts/Sows
REMEMBER!
Culling boars and gilts should be decided upon based on:
Y reproductive failures
Y feet and leg problem
Y damaged udder section
Y health status