The Conquest of Sindh: Contributed by Prof. Dr. Nazeer Ahmed, PHD
The Conquest of Sindh: Contributed by Prof. Dr. Nazeer Ahmed, PHD
The Conquest of Sindh: Contributed by Prof. Dr. Nazeer Ahmed, PHD
From pre-Islamic times, there was a brisk trade between the eastern coast of
the Arabian Peninsula and the western coast of India and Sri Lanka. Ships
rode the eastern monsoons to the coast of Malabar and Sri Lanka to pick up
spices and returned home riding on the western monsoons. Spices were in
great demand throughout West Asia, North Africa and southern Europe and
transactions were extremely profitable. This trade continued to thrive and
expand with the advent of Muslim rule in West Asia and North Africa. It was
through these merchants that Islam was first introduced into Kerala in
southwestern India and Sri Lanka, located near the tip of India.
Sindh was notorious for its pirates in those times. These pirates would wait in
ambush for merchant ships on the coast of Sindh and would raid them for
booty. In the fateful year 707, these pirates attacked one of the Muslim
merchant ships sailing back from Sri Lanka to the Persian Gulf. The men,
women and children on board the ship were captured and taken inland to
Sindh, where the Raja imprisoned them.
Hajjaj bin Yusuf Saqafi was the Omayyad governor of Iraq. When reports
reached him of this incident, he wrote to Raja Dahir demanding that the
captives be released and the responsible pirates punished. Dahir refused.
This refusal set the stage for the onset of hostilities. It was the responsibility of
the Caliphate to protect its citizens and to fight against injustice no matter
what quarter it came from. Hajjaj bin Yusuf had that responsibility as a
governor representing the Caliph. He sent an expedition under Ubaidullah bin
Binhan to free the captives but Ubaidullah was defeated and killed in combat
by troops of the Raja.
had to offer the more advanced Islamic civilization. The flow of knowledge
was almost always from Islam to the West. By contrast, the Muslims learned a
great deal from India).
Soon, the borders of the Omayyad Empire extended to the borders of China
and the Muslims acquired a great many advanced technologies from the
Chinese, including the processing and manufacture of silk, porcelain, paper
and gunpowder. The Prophet himself said: “Seek knowledge even onto
China”. The addition of what is today Pakistan consolidated an empire
extending from the Pyrenees to the Indus and the Gobi desert. This vast
empire was now rubbing elbows with the ancient civilizations of India and
China. From this vantage point, the Muslims were in a superb position to
absorb, transform and develop knowledge from Persia, Greece, India and
China.
Muhammed bin Qasim was eager to continue his advance into northern and
eastern Punjab but events in far away Damascus overtook events in Pakistan.
Caliph Walid I died in 713. In the ensuing political turbulence, Muhammed bin
Qasim was summoned back to Iraq, just as Musa bin Nusair was summoned
from Spain at about the same time.
After the death of Caliph Walid I, the end of Muhammed bin Qasim was even
more tragic than that of Musa bin Nusair. Muhammed bin Qasim was a
nephew of Hajjaj bin Yusuf, also known as Hajjaj the Cruel, the governor of
Iraq. The new Caliph Sulaiman had a personal dislike of Hajjaj but Hajjaj died
before Sulaiman could punish him. So, Sulaiman turned instead against
Hajjaj’s relatives. Muhammed bin Qasim was dismissed and sent back to Iraq.
The new governor of Iraq, Saleh bin Abdur Rahman hated Hajjaj because the
latter had killed Saleh’s brother. But since Hajjaj had died, Saleh also turned
against Hajjaj’s relatives. Muhammed bin Qasim was arrested and sent to
prison for no fault but that he was a nephew of Hajjaj. In prison, Muhammed
bin Qasim was blinded, tortured and killed. Thus ended the life of two of the
most brilliant generals of the 8 century.
th
The fate of Musa bin Nusair and Muhammed bin Qasim is a lesson of
historical importance. With the ascension of Muawiya, legitimacy of rule was
no longer by consent of the masses; it was by force. Sultan after sultan arose
and established himself by dictate or by virtue of inheritance from soldier-
conquerors. When a ruler was competent and just, as happened with Omar
bin Abdul Aziz, the common people enjoyed some freedoms. When he was a
tyrant, as happened with Sulaiman bin Abdul Malik, the people suffered. Since
the period of the first fourCaliphs, Muslims have not shown an institutional
capability to evolve and nourish their political leadership from among the
masses. When the body politic throws up its first echelon of leadership, the
tendency has been to destroy that leadership, unless the leader survives
through shrewd maneuvering or ruthless imposition. This inability to cultivate
and nourish political leadership from the bottom up has defined the limits of
Muslim power and in a broader sense, the achievements of Islamic
civilization. The survival of potential leaders has always depended on the
whims of the despot at the top or of his local political cronies.
A second lesson from the tragic deaths of these two outstanding generals is
that the internal dialectic of the world of Islam has defined the limits of its
reach. Having completed the conquest of Spain, Musa bin Zubair was ready
to launch an invasion of France when he was called back. He might well have
succeeded in this goal because there was as yet no strong leader into resist a
determined assault. By the time the Muslims did come around to venture into
central France, Gaul had a strong leader in Charles Martel and the Muslims
were forced to turn around at the Battle of Tours (737). Similarly, Muhammed
bin Qasim had successfully penetrated the Indian defenses in the IndusRiver
basin. Given a green signal from Damascus and Kufa, he might well have
extended the dominions of the Caliphate into the Gangetic plains. This was
not to be. Mohammed bin Qasim was called back from Multan just as he
prepared to launch a major thrust beyond the Indus River. Northern India
remained in Rajput hands for the time being. It was not until the victory of
Mohammed Ghori at the Battle of Panipat (1191) that the Muslims captured
Delhi. In both cases, it was the internal turmoil in the Muslim body politic that
was the determining factor in the arrest of the Muslim advance.