Dithiocarbamate-Group-GC Methods
Dithiocarbamate-Group-GC Methods
Dithiocarbamate-Group-GC Methods
Dithiocarbamates are a class of fungicides extensively used in many crops worldwide. The current
residue definition of dithiocarbamates in food for compliance with maximum residue limits, at
national and international levels, is total residues arising from the use of any or each dithiocarbamate
fungicide, determined as CS2. The analytical method most frequently used to analyze dithiocarbamate
residues in food for monitoring purposes was proposed more than 30 years ago. In this method,
total dithiocarbamates are decomposed to CS2, which is purified and reacted with a cupric reagent.
The yellow complex formed is quantified by spectrophotometry. In this paper, a new reaction system
for the purification and complexation of CS2 is proposed. The new system is less fragile than the
traditional design, is easier to assemble, and allows for a higher sample throughput, in addition to
being of low cost. Recovery of added mancozeb, thiram, or ziram (0.15-8.0 mg/kg) in rice, beans,
apple, banana, orange, papaya, tomato, cucumber, and potato ranged from 82 to 120%, with relative
standard deviations from 0 to 10% (n ) 3 or 5). Analysis of apple, tomato, and papaya samples with
field-incurred dithiocarbamate residues showed comparable results using both the traditional and
the new reaction systems.
Table 1. Recovery of Added Dithiocarbamate Fungicides Table 2. Analysis of Samples with Field-Incurred
in Food Using the Proposed Vertical CS2 Reaction Dithiocarbamate Residues Using the Traditional
System In-Series and the Proposed Vertical Reaction Systemsa
amount added av % RSDb traditional proposed
food compound (mg of CS2/kg) recoverya (%)
mg of RSD mg of RSD RSDb
apple mancozeb 0.15 102 9.9 crop CS2/kg (%) CS2/kg (%) (%)
1.0 82 7.8
apple 1.2 4.7 0.98 12 14
3.0 98 5.1
0.96 13 0.87 10 6.9
thiram 1.0 110 0
0.29 11 0.34 6.7 11
ziram 1.0 90 5.1
tomato 0.45 6.9 0.47 4.3 3.1
papaya mancozeb 0.15 120 2.8 0.49 10 0.43 7.3 9.2
1.0 106 4.9 papaya skin 0.46 13 0.48 7.1 2.7
thiram 0.15 103 2.8 a Each residue value is the average of three replicate samples.
1.0 91 1.5 b Relative standard deviation of residues in both systems.
3.0 106 3.0
orange mancozeb 0.15 86 4.5 foods chosen represent the different crop classes that
1.0 95 7.3 are normally treated with dithiocarbamates: cereal
banana mancozeb 0.15 105 3.8 grains (rice), legume vegetables (beans), fruits with
1.0 93 5.1 edible and inedible peels (apple, banana, orange, and
2.0 106 8.2 papaya), fruiting vegetables (tomato and cucumber), and
thiram 1.0 110 0 root vegetables (potato). The results are shown in Table
ziram 1.0 87 4.0
1. For all of the compounds and foods tested, the
dry beans mancozeb 0.15 102 9.9 recoveries fell within the range of 82-120%, with
1.0 96 1.0 relative standard deviations (n ) 3 or 5) ranging from
thiram 1.0 110 0 0 to 10%.
ziram 1.0 90 3.9
The vertical CS2 reaction system described in this
polished rice mancozeb 0.15 120 3.3 paper has been applied successfully in our laboratory
1.0 101 7.5 for monitoring dithiocarbamates in food for compliance
8.0 95 6.6 with Brazilian MRLs and for dietary exposure assess-
thiram 1.0 91 2.8
ziram 0.15 108 1.5 ment. The system represents a considerable improve-
1.0 110 0 ment from the traditional in-series two-trap system in
3.0 106 7.4 three main aspects: (a) reduced space requirements in
a laboratory; (b) reduced time needed for assembling/
potato mancozeb 0.15 98 10
1.0 86 4.0 deassembling, resulting in a higher sample throughput;
thiram 1.0 107 2.0 and (c) lowered repair costs. In a laboratory bench space
ziram 1.0 90 2.3 of 1.5 × 0.5 m, where there were two in-series two-trap
systems, we now have five new systems. The two-trap
tomato mancozeb 0.15 107 0
1.0 105 2.0 traditional system has at least four segments, which
4.0 103 1.4 have to be handled carefully to avoid damage, demand-
ing ∼10 min for assembling, including checking for gas
cucumber mancozeb 0.15 104 7.2 leaks. The vertical system has only two segments, which
1.5 102 3.9
thiram 0.15 100 0 are much less fragile, requiring <2 min to assemble,
1.5 93 0 and does not need to be checked for gas leaks. The
ziram 0.15 100 0 robustness of the new system also reduced considerably
1.5 91 3.8 its maintenance due to damaged parts, decreasing the
a n ) 3 in all cases except for thiram in papaya and ziram in costs per analysis.
rice at 0.15 and 3.0 mg/kg, where n ) 5. b Relative standard From over the 100 food samples of rice, beans, tomato,
deviation. potato, banana, papaya, and orange collected at local
market and analyzed in the laboratory using the vertical
was removed from the system, large gas bubbles were system, dithiocarbamates were detected in only tomato,
formed, carrying basic vapor from trap 1 to the color apple, and papaya skin. Analysis of samples with field-
reagent solution in trap 2, changing its pH. The ef- incurred dithiocarbamate residues was performed using
ficiency of the complexation reaction in trap 2 decreased both the traditional in-series and the proposed vertical
as the pH increased, yielding low recoveries (<60%). systems (Table 2). The two systems yield comparable
The N2 flow rate was also found to be critical and results, with the relative standard deviations (RSD) of
should not be >180 mL/min; otherwise, it could also the values falling within the same range of each system
carry NaOH from trap 1 to trap 2. Higher flow rates RSD.
can decrease the volume of the alcoholic color reagent Conclusion. Although chromatographic methods
solution in trap 2, also affecting the performance of the have been applied successfully in the analysis of dithio-
system. The antireflux retention valve helps to regulate carbamates as CS2 in food, the spectrophotometric
the gas flow, in addition to preventing any reflux in case method proposed by Cullen (17) and Keppel (18) is still
of a sudden decrease in pressure. widely used. The method can achieve the sensitivity
The efficiency and reproducibility of the new system required for compliance with national and international
(Figure 3) were tested with different food crops spiked MRLs, and it is especially suitable for monitoring
with dithiocarbamates (Figure 1) at levels from 0.15 to laboratories in developing countries, due to its low costs
8.0 mg of CS2/kg. These concentrations are within the and minimal laboratory and analytical expertise re-
range of MRLs for dithiocarbamates in various crops quirements. We have proposed a new CS2 reaction
in Brazil (10) and in the Codex Alimentarius (11). The system for use with the spectrophotometric method. The
Dithiocarbamate Residues in Food J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 49, No. 10, 2001 4525
new system is less fragile than the old system, is easier (11) Codex Alimentarius. Pesticide Residues in Foods
to assemble, and allows for higher sample throughput. Maximum Residue Limits; Food and Agriculture Orga-
This new reaction system can potentially be applied for nization of the United Nations, World Health Organi-
the analysis of dithiocarbamates in fungicide formula- zation: Rome, Italy, 2000; Vol. 2B.
(12) Hill, A. R. C. Headspace Methods for Dithiocarbamates.
tions to replace the apparatus recommended by the
In Modern Methods for Pesticide Analysis. Emerging
methodology of the AOAC International (22). Strategies for Pesticide Analysis; Cairns, T., Sherma, J.,
Eds.; CRC Press: London, U.K., 1992; pp 213-231.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT (13) Jianren, Y.; Yongquan, Z.; Shuzshen, J.; Zhengguo, W.;
Fuzhen, Z. Gas Chromatographic Headspace Determi-
We acknowledge the assistance of Monica Moraes nation of Dithiocarbamate Fungicide Residues on Veg-
Nunes with sample preparation and Carol R. Johnson etables. Sci. Agric. Sin. 1989, 22, 76-80.
for reviewing the English language. (14) Friedrichs, K.; Winkeler, H. D.; Gerhards, P. Determi-
nation of Dithiocarbamate Residues in Foodstuff by
LITERATURE CITED Headspace Gas Chromatography and Flame Photomet-
ric Detection. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1995, 201,
(1) WHO. Pesticide Residues in Foods1993. Evaluations. 69-73.
Part IIsToxicology; International Programme on Chemi- (15) Pelegrı́, R.; Gamón, M.; Coscollá, R.; Beltrán, V.; Cuñat,
cal Safety; World Health Organization: Geneva, Swit- P. Determinación de residuos de mancozeb en frutas y
zerland, 1994. hortalizas por cromatografı́a de gases. Modificación del
(2) Gustafsson, K. H.; Fahlgren, C. H. Determination of método de recogida de disulfuro de carbono producido
Dithiocarbamate Fungicides in Vegetable Foodstuffs by em la descomposición ácida. Rev. Agroquim. Tecnol.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Agric. Aliment. 1991, 31, 573-579.
Food Chem. 1983, 31, 461-463. (16) Harrington, P.; Horner, J.; Hird, S.; Griffiths, T.; Rey-
(3) van Lishaut H.; Schwack, W. Selective Trace Determi- nolds, S. L. Modification of the Method for Measurement
nation of Dithiocarbamate Fungicides in Fruit and of Dithiocarbamate Residues as Carbon Disulfide in
Vegetables by Reverse-Phase Ion-Pair Liquid Chroma- Fruit and Vegetables; Central Science Laboratory: York,
tography with Ultraviolet and Electrochemical Detec- U.K., 1998; pp 1-34.
tion. J. AOAC Int. 2000, 83, 720-727. (17) Cullen, T. E. Spectrophotometric Determination of
(4) Silva, Ma del P.; Procopio, J. R.; Hernández, L. Electro- Dithiocarbamates Residues on Food Crops. Anal. Chem.
chemical Detection in the Determination of Several 1964, 36, 221-224.
Dithiocarbamates by Reverse-Phase Liquid Chromatog- (18) Keppel, G. E. Collaborative Study of the Determination
raphy. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1999, 22, of Dithiocarbamate. Residues by a Modified Carbon
463-475. Disulfide Evolution Method. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.
(5) Verma, B. C.; Sood, R. K.; Sharma, D. K.; Sidhu, H. S.; 1971, 54, 528-532.
Chauhan, S. Improved Spectrophotometric Method for (19) Bohrer, D.; Nascimento, P. C.; Gomes, H. M. Improve-
the Determination of Thiram Residues in Grains. Ana- ment in the Determination of Mancozeb Residues by the
lyst 1984, 109, 649-650. Carbon Disulfide Evolution Method Using Flow Injec-
(6) Malik, A. K. Determination of the Fungicide Ferbam in tion Analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 212-216.
Wheat Grains after Adsorption onto Microcrystalline (20) Vuik, J.; van Dinter, R.; de Vos, R. H. Improved Sample
Naphthalene. J. AOAC Int. 2000, 83, 971-975. Pretreatment of the Carbon Disulfide Evolution Method
(7) Dogheim, S. M.; Alla, S. A. G.; El-Marsafy, A. M.; for the Determination of Dithiocarbamate Residues in
Fahmy, S. Monitoring Pesticide Residues in Egyptian Lettuce. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 604-606.
Fruits and Vegetables in 1995. J. AOAC Int. 1999, 82, (21) Thier, H. P., Zeumer, H., Eds. Dithiocarbamate and
948-955. Thiuram Disulfide Fungicides. In Manual of Pesticide
(8) Ripley, B. D.; Lissemore, L. I.; Leisheman, P. D.; Residues Analysis; Pesticide Commission: Germany,
Denommé, M. A. Pesticide Residues on Fruits and 1987; Vol. 1, 432 p.
Vegetables from Ontario, Canada, 1991-1995. J. AOAC (22) Cunniff, P., Ed. Official Methods of Analysis; AOAC
Int. 2000, 83, 196-213. International: Arlington, VA, 1995; Chapter 7.
(9) Sadlo, S. Quantitative Relationship of Application Rate
and Pesticide Residues in Greenhouse Tomatoes. J.
AOAC Int. 2000, 83, 214-219. Received for review January 29, 2001. Revised manuscript
(10) ANVISA. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. received June 15, 2001. Accepted June 17, 2001.
Toxicologia (cited in 2000), available at URL http://
www.anvisa.gov.br. JF010124A