C14T1P3 - Motivational Factors and The Hospitality Industry
C14T1P3 - Motivational Factors and The Hospitality Industry
C14T1P3 - Motivational Factors and The Hospitality Industry
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40 which are based on
Reading Passage 3 below.
Motivational factors and the hospitality industry
Some hotels aim to provide superior working conditions for their employees. The
idea originated from workplaces – usually in the non-service sector – that
emphasized fun and enjoyment as part of work-life balance. By contrast, the
service sector, and more specifically hotels, has traditionally not extended these
practices to address basic employee needs, such as good working conditions.
Lucas also points out that ‘the substance of HRM practices does not appear to be
designed to foster constructive relations with employees or to represent a
managerial approach that enables developing and drawing out the full potential of
people, even though employees may be broadly satisfied with many aspects of
their work’ (Lucas, 2002). In addition, or maybe as a result, high employee
turnover has been a recurring problem throughout the hospitality industry. Among
the many cited reasons are low compensation, inadequate benefits, poor working
conditions and compromised employee morale and attitudes (Maroudas et al.,
2008).
Ng and Sorensen (2008) demonstrated that when managers provide recognition to
employees, motivate employees to work together, and remove obstacles preventing
effective performance, employees feel more obligated to stay with the company.
This was succinctly summarized by Michel et al. (2013): ‘[P]roviding support to
employees gives them the confidence to perform their jobs better and the
motivation to stay with the organization.’ Hospitality organizations can therefore
enhance employee motivation and retention through the development and
improvement of their working conditions. These conditions are inherently linked to
the working environment.
While it seems likely that employees’ reactions to their job characteristics could be
affected by a predisposition to view their work environment negatively, no
evidence exists to support this hypothesis (Spector et al., 2000). However, given
the opportunity, many people will find something to complain about in relation to
their workplace (Poulston, 2009). There is a strong link between the perceptions of
employees and particular factors of their work environment that are separate from
the work itself, including company policies, salary and vacations.
Such conditions are particularly troubling for the luxury hotel market, where high-
quality service, requiring a sophisticated approach to HRM, is recognized as a
critical source of competitive advantage (Maroudas et al., 2008). In a real sense,
the services of hotel employees represent their industry (Schneider and Bowen,
1993). This representation has commonly been limited to guest experiences. This
suggests that there has been a dichotomy between the guest environment provided
in luxury hotels and the working conditions of their employees.
Employees also have intrinsic motivation needs or motivators, which include such
factors as achievement and recognition. Unlike extrinsic factors, motivator factors
may ideally result in job satisfaction (Maroudas et al., 2008). Herzberg’s (1966)
theory discusses the need for a ‘balance’ of these two types of needs.
The impact of fun as a motivating factor at work has also been explored. For
example, Tews, Michel and Stafford (2013) (36-40) conducted a study focusing
on staff from a chain of themed restaurants in the United States. It was found that
fun activities had a favorable impact on performance and manager support for fun
had a favorable impact in reducing turnover. Their findings support the view that
fun may indeed have a beneficial effect, but the framing of that fun must be
carefully aligned with both organizational goals and employee characteristics.
‘Managers must learn how to achieve the delicate balance of allowing employees
the freedom to enjoy themselves at work while simultaneously high levels of
performance’ (Tews et al., 2013).
Deery (2008) has recommended several actions that can be adopted at the
organizational level to retain good staff as well as assist in balancing work and
family life. Those particularly appropriate to the hospitality industry include
allowing adequate breaks during the working day, staff functions that involve
families, and providing health and well-being opportunities.
Questions 27-31
Look at the following statements (Questions 27-31) and the list of researchers
below.
Match each statement with the correct researcher, A-F.
Write the correct letter, A-F, in boxes 27-31 on your answer sheet.
NB You may use any letter more than once.
27 Hotel managers need to know what would encourage good staff to remain.
28 The actions of managers may make staff feel they shouldn’t move to a
different employer.
29 Little is done in the hospitality industry to help workers improve their skills.
30 Staff are less likely to change jobs if cooperation is encouraged.
31 Dissatisfaction with pay is not the only reason why hospitality workers change
jobs.
List of Researchers
A Pfeffer
B Lucas
C Maroudas et al.
D Ng and Sorensen
E Enz and Siguaw
F Deery
Questions 32-35
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage
3?
Tews, Michel and Stafford carried out research on staff in an American chain of
36 (nplural) ………………………. They discovered that activities designed for
staff to have fun improved their 37 (N)………………………, and that
management involvement led to lower staff 38 (N) ………………………….. .
They also found that the activities needed to fit with both the company’s 39 (n)
………………………….. and the 40 (N)…………………………. of the staff. A
balance was required between a degree of freedom and maintaining work
standards.