Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Reinforced With FRP Rebars - A Review
Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Reinforced With FRP Rebars - A Review
Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Reinforced With FRP Rebars - A Review
A. Saikumar1; G. Kumaran2
1
Research Scholar, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India.
2
Professor, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abstract
The advantages of FRP reinforcements have made the researchers to concentrate on the various
studies of FRP reinforcements for repair and strength of RC structures in the recent past years. FRP
rods have proven their excellence in the construction of structures which are exposed to corrosion.
Similarly, Geopolymer (GPC) concrete outstands prominently with its distinct properties like
improved strength, resistant to acid, fire flames, sulphate, lesser shrinkage and creep. This paper
reviews the important and extensive studies conducted by the researchers to bring out the important
aspects related with the flexural performance of FRP reinforcements in GPC.
1. Introduction
Due to the rapid growth of construction industry, world is in great demand of finding an
alternate material to OPC. To overcome this, Geo Polymer Concrete (GPC) which is also a type of
concrete without cement but having remarkable potential has been introduced. The appropriateness
and structural performance of GPC with FRP bars contribute a secure and meticulous opening of a
new technology in construction and civil infrastructure. Davidovits (1988) introduced GPC as an
alternative to the habitual cementitious binders, but with the additional benefits in order to reduce
greenhouse emissions. Waste by products from industries such as, Ground granulated blast furnace
slag (GGBS), Metakaolin, Fly ash have been used to manufacture GPC. Because of its stable reaction
ingredients and microstructures, the handling of GPC is simplified. Speaking about FRP rebars, they
are well known in the construction industry since past few decades for its higher reserved strength
In recent years, FRP rebars has been projected as reinforcing material. FRP rebars consist
reinforcing fibres to impart strength and matrix to clutch the fibres in the exact position, giving the
composite material its structural integrity. Revolutionary research on fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)
composites has been started at the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, or
EMPA. Though the cost of FRP is very high nearly two to three times that of steel, the inherent
properties of FRP such as corrosion restance, higher tensile strength and lower density, effortless
handling by labours highlighted in the construction of special structures subjected to aggressive
environments [1,2,4,15,17].
FRP rebars posses distinct characteristics like corrosion resistant, less density, higher reserved
strength in the direction of fibres, Lower modulus of elascticity when compared to steel rebars. They
are brittle in nature and show linear elastic response. The modes of failure depend on the type and
volume fraction of fibres and resin. GFRP rebars have higher tensile strength, compressive strengths,
durability, and electromagnetic permeability. Upto the failure point FRP rods show signs of a linear
elastic behaviour. The type and volume percentage of fibres contribute lower elastic modulus to the
rods. The FRP rods are distinct from steel rods, in lacking of yielding nature at the failure stage and
exhibiting the rupture of rods. Some of the important Properties of GFRP rebars addressed by few
researches are shown in Table 1
Lloyd, (2010) has listed the influencing factors on strength of GPC as temperature kept on
curing, shape of aggregate, moisture content, procedure of preparation and grading of ingredients
with some recent applications of geopolymer concrete. Antony Jeyasehar et al. (2013) have compared
the mechanical properties of GPC such as compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural
strength with that of OPC. It has been observed that the strength of Geopolymer Concrete raised with
enhance in Alkali –Activator Solution / fly ash ratio up to 0.5 and also, the strength of Geopolymer
Concrete will be enhanced with increasing molarity of NaOH.
Zhijie Huang (2020) used the GPC subjected to ambient curing. The alkaline solution used
was a mixture of 12 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and commercial D-grade sodium silicate
Hemn Qader Ahmed (2020) used sodium silicate solution (Na2SiO3) and sodium hydroxide
(NaOH) pellets with 98% limpidness. Low calcium fly ash type F, Coarse aggregate of size 9.52 mm
and fine aggregates were used. To enhance the workability sulfonated naphthalene formaldehyde was
used as superplasticiser. The variables considered for the GPC 13 trail mixes given in Table .3 were
1. molarity of sodium hydroxide (M), 2. alkaline-fly ash ratio and 3. water-binder ratio. The water–
binder ratio was calculated as follows; the amount of water in sodium silicate solution, sodium
hydroxide solution, and additional water was divided by the solid parts in sodium silicate solution,
sodium hydroxide solution and fly ash.
Since the distinct brittle linear elastic behaviour of FRP rebars does not allow the existing
guidelines of conventional flexural members in predicting its performance exactly, the experimental
validations are required. The empirical equations involved in limit state design which is used in the
conventional members are to be modified after the experimental examination. GPC reinforced with
FRP bars provides an enhanced construction process with high robustness, and passable strength.
Maranan et al. (2015) investigated the flexural capability of GFRP reinforced GPC beams and
concluded that the size of bar had no prominent effect on the flexural capacity of the beams. On
increasing rebar ratio, the serviceability behaviour of beam increases (Maranan et al. 2015). Shear
behaviour of GPC beams reinforced with GFRP rebars and stirrups have also been studied by
Maranan et al. 2017 accomplishing that the GFRP stirrups enhances both the shear strength and
deflection capacity of the beams by approximately 200%.
Hemn Qader Ahmed (2020) cast twelve beams out of which nine GFRP-RGPC and three
GFRP-ROPC beams and tested under two-point loading test over an active span of 2000 mm. All
beams have the same height 300 mm and width 160 mm. For all the beams a clear cover of 20 mm
was used. Three different rebar ratios (ρf<ρfb, ρfb<ρf< 1.4 ρfb and ρf> 1.4 ρfb) in order to observe the
different modes of failure, three different compressive strengths (20MPa,35 MPa and 50 MPa) and
two types of concrete (OPC-Ordinary Portland Cement concrete and GPC-Geo polymer concrete)
have been taken as variables. All beams were simply supported. GFRP rebars and steel rebars of 6
mm diameter were used for all beams as main longitudinal reinforcements. To prepare GPC low
calcium flyash type F, aggregates satisfying ASTM C33,2003 were used. To enhance the workability,
Sulfonated naphthalene formaldehyde was used as superplasticiser along with an optimum water
binder ratio of 0.25. It was noted that the relative amount of rebar had a remarkable effect on both
first cracking and ultimate loads.
It has been observed that both the deflection and initial cracking load were increased with the
compressive strength. Four different types of failure were observed. Beams reinforced with ρf<ρfb
suffered tension failure of GFRP bars; beams reinforced with ρf<ρfb failed due to tension failure of
GFRP bars followed by a compressive failure of the top concrete part; beams reinforced with ρf>ρfb
subjected to debonding of GFRP from the concrete at the bottom of the beam. on increasing the
compressive strength, the deflections of the beams was considerably reduced with less number of
crack widths.
5. Conclusions
References
ACI 440.1R-15. (2015). Guide for the design and construction of Concrete Reinforced with Fiber
Reinforced Polymers (FRP) bars, ACI Committee 440.Farmington Hills, MI, USA: American
Concrete Institute.
Ahmadi, M.S. Johari, M. Sadighi, M. Esfandeh. An experimental study on mechanical properties of
GFRP braid-pultruded composite rods M. S. EXPRESS Polymer Letters, 3(9) (2009) 560–568.
Antony Jeyasehar. C, G. Saravanan, M. Salahuddin and S. Thirugnanasambandam (2013).
“Development of fly ash based geopolymer precast concrete elements”, Asian Journal of Civil
Engineering, 14(4), 605-615. (2013).
CSA S806-12. (2012). Design and construction of Building structures with Fiber- Reinforced
Polymers, Canadian Standard Association (CSA). Canada: Ontario.
Davidovits, J. (1988). Geopolymer chemistry and properties. In Proceedings of the 1st international
conference on geopolymer ’88, 1, 25–48. Compiegne, 1–3 June 1988.