Divine Word College of Bangued Bangued, Abra College Department
Divine Word College of Bangued Bangued, Abra College Department
Bangued, Abra
College Department
Introduction:
In this lesson, you shall learn that we may be gifted with intellect and the capacity to renationalize things but at the
end of the day, our growth and development and consequentially, our selves are truly products of our interaction with
external reality.
A. Motivation:
When you are asked the most difficult questions, who are you? what is the first answer that you would give?
most if not all would answer, My name is; I live in; I’m __ years old; My hobbies are; and so on. Basically, you would
give biological facts about who you are but from the perspective of sociology, your genetic make-up and biology do
not define who you really are because when you are born, society sees you as “barbarians” with no sense of self at
all.
Sociology is the scientific study of society, including patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and
culture. It focuses primarily on the influence of social relationship on your attitudes and behavior. It is, therefore,
imperative to have a deeper realization about the sociological perspective of the self for you to be more sensitive and
tolerant of people different from you and most importantly for you to answer the difficult question “Who am I?”
B. Presentation:
What is the relationship between external reality and the self? How much of who you are now a product of your
society, community and family?
So, what is the vibrant relationship between the SELF and EXTERNAL REALITY? This lesson is meant for you to
better understand that relationship. This perspective is known as the self-constructivist perspective.
“Social constructivists argue for a merged view of “the person” and “their social context” where the
boundaries of one cannot easily be separated from the boundaries of the other” (Stevens 1996)
Social constructivists argue that the self should bit be seen as a static entity that stays constant through and
through. Rather, the self has to be seen as something that is in unceasing flux, in a constant struggle with
external reality and is malleable in its dealings with society. The self is always in participation with social life
and its identity subjected to influences here and there. Having these perspectives considered should draw
one into concluding that the self is truly multifaceted.
For the individual to discover the “true” and “authentic” part of himself/herself to realize his/her potentials, there is a
need to abolish repressive social constraints.
Four (4) Terms Postmodernists Use to Speak of the Self. (Walter Truett Anderson, writer)
a. Multiphrenia refers to the many voices in different cultures that tell who and what a person is. The idea of
“authentic self “with knowable characteristics recedes from view because of the many roles that a person
needs to do in conformity with the kind of society he/she is into. There is no authentic self but a
multidimensional self.
b. Protean, the popular notion “walang forever” may best describe this postmodern view of self because this
means that the self is capable of changing constantly to conform with the present circumstances. For
postmodernists, these changes are manifestations that there is no true, stable self.
c. Decentered Self is a belief that there is no self at all because self is constantly redefined and constantly
undergoing change. Self is not fixed and has no enduring meaning.
d. Self in Relations means that a person’s life is not lived of himself/herself but in relation to the people and to
certain cultural contexts. For other, to understand themselves, they must understand the context of their
lives.
4. The Self as an Artistic Creation.
Modernity and Identity says that in the post traditional order, self-identity is a reflexive project – an endeavor that
everyone continuously works and reflect on. It means you can create, you maintain, and you revise biographical
narratives of yourself for you to transform into a beautiful work of art. If for this reason you are weak, and you fail, the
failure does not define who you are. you can and may surpass everyone else the next season and continue being so
because the unity of the self is something that you must accomplish through conscious effort.
Life is not a one-way path; there are various detours, curves and occasional accidents. These detours can actually
present opportunities for yourself to be reconstructed or rewritten the best way you want it to appear to the reader or
to the viewer. The important thing is you have created yourself an identity as an artistic creation.
One of the most important sociological approaches to the self was developed by American sociologist George
Herbert Mead. Mead conceptualized the mind as the individual importation of the social process. Mead presented the
self and the mind in terms of a social process. As gestures are taken in by the individual organism, the individual
organism also takes in the collective attitudes of others, in the form of gestures, and reacts accordingly with other
organized attitudes.
This process is characterized by Mead as the “I” and the “me.” The “me” is the social self and the “I” is the response
to the “me.” In other words, the “I” is the response of an individual to the attitudes of others, while the “me” is the
organized set of attitudes of others which an individual assumes. The “me” is the accumulated understanding of the
“generalized other,” i.e. how one thinks one’s group perceives oneself. The “I” is the individual’s impulses. The “I” is
self as subject; the “me” is self as object. The “I” is the knower, the “me” is the known. The mind, or stream of
thought, is the self-reflective movements of the interaction between the “I” and the “me.” These dynamics go beyond
selfhood in a narrow sense and form the basis of a theory of human cognition. For Mead the thinking process is the
internalized dialogue between the “I” and the “me.”
Understood as a combination of the “I” and the “me,” Mead’s self proves to be noticeably entwined within a
sociological existence. For Mead, existence in a community comes before individual consciousness. First one must
participate in the different social positions within society and only subsequently can one use that experience to take
the perspective of others and become self-conscious.
2nd stage (3-5)– Play stage – role taking –mentally assuming the perspective of another
The self is developing and emerges through pretend play.
3rd stage (5 – 8/9)– Game stage – can consider tasks and relationships simultaneously
The self has emerged.
The Looking Glass Self: Our Sense of Self is Influenced by Other’s Views of Us.
The concept of the looking-glass self, states that part of how we see ourselves comes from our perception
of how others see us. (Cooley, 1902)
According to Cooley, the degree of personal insecurity you display in social situations is determined by what you
believe other people think of you. Cooley’s concept of the looking glass self, states that a person’s self grows out of a
person’s social interactions with others. The view of ourselves comes from the contemplation of personal qualities
and impressions of how others perceive us. How we see ourselves does not come from who we really are, but rather
from how we believe others see us. (Isaksen, 2013)
Sometimes, the influence of other people’s appraisals of ourselves on our self-concept may be so strong that we
end up internalizing them.
Labeling bias occurs when we are labeled, and others views and expectations of us are affected by the labeling
especially our self-esteem. If we are repeatedly labeled and evaluated by others, self-labeling may occur which
happens when we adopt others’ labels explicitly into our self-concept.
The effects of this self-labeling on our self esteem appear to depend very much on the nature of the labels.
Labels used in relation to diagnosis of psychological disorders can be detrimental to people who internalize
them.
Internalized prejudice occurs when individuals turn prejudice directed toward them by others onto themselves
and it is found to predict more negative self-concept and poorer psychological adjustment in members of various
groups including sexual minorities.
Social Comparison Theory: Our Sense of Self Is influenced by Comparisons with Others
Self-concept and self-esteem are also heavily influence by the process of social comparison.
Social Comparison occurs when we learn about our abilities and skills, about the appropriateness and validity of
our opinions, and about our relative social status by comparing our own attitudes, beliefs and behaviors with
others.
Social comparison occurs primarily on dimensions on which there are no correct answers or objective
benchmarks and this on which we can rely only on the beliefs of others for information.
We also use social comparison to help us determine our skills or abilities – how good we are at performing a
task or doing a job.
C. Discussion:
The relationship of an individual and society is always a debatable issue. It is an issue whether you are
shaped by the elements of society you are born with, or you shape the society you are in. The different sociological
view of the self should make you realize that the self can be viewed in many ways. Having introduced of these views
I hope that it helped you understand yourself better and answer the most common difficult question, “who are you?”
Existence in the community comes before you can know yourself; that is what sociological perspective of
the self teaches. Social institutions such as family, church, and the community you live in are indispensable in
knowing who you really are.
When you understand these views of the self, it will help you recognize how and why you act and say the
way you do. It will be easier to understand and adjust to other people’s behaviors and feelings. It will help you
develop compassion which will lead to a decision to be more kind and forgiving towards others.
After you have known how socialization works in all elements of society is, you are now ready to better understand
who you really are. You can reflect by asking yourself what attitudes and values you have that your family, friends,
the church, and your community have greatly influenced you.
D. Enrichment Activities:
In a separate sheet of short bond paper, do the following activities. Please do this activity by yourself. You may ask
help from anyone but do not let them do it for you.
1. If you are a piece of art, what would it be and why? Draw a picture of art you wish to become and write a
biographical essay about yourself. (You may search the internet for a sample)
2. To better understand Mead’s theory of the “I and me”, use your cellphone and take a selfie.
Answer the following questions:
a. Whom do you see in the picture?
b. Who took the picture?
c. What did you just do?
d. Briefly explain the role of the “I and me” in the act of taking a selfie.
e. What does the selfie represent?
3. Explain the concept of social comparison and why it is important to human behavior. Describe some aspects of
your self-concept that have been created through social comparison.
References:
A. Books
Brawner, Dalisay G., Arcega, Analisa F. (2018) Understanding the Self, C&E Publishing, Inc., Quezon City,
Philippines
Degho, Silverius Ega, Sagun-Degho, Grace, De Claro, Loressa Joy S., Lejano, Jacqueline B., (2018) Understanding
the Self, An Outcome-Based Workbook for College Students, Mutya Publishing House, Malabon City, Philippines
Villafuerte, Salvacion L.; Ph.D, Quillope, Al F. Ph.D, Tunac, Rudjane C.;MA, Borja, Estela I.; MAEd (2018).
Understanding the Self, NIEME Publishing House CO.LTD. Cubao, Quezon City Philippines
Prepared by:
Sarah Jane Bringas Lule, MAED
Faculty member, SASE
sjmblule.dwcb@gmail.com