Organization of Contents in Intended Junior Secondary Science Curriculum of Bangladesh: An Explorative Study
Organization of Contents in Intended Junior Secondary Science Curriculum of Bangladesh: An Explorative Study
Organization of Contents in Intended Junior Secondary Science Curriculum of Bangladesh: An Explorative Study
ABSTRACT
This study explored the organization of contents in the junior secondary science curriculum of Bangladesh. The research questions of
this study focus on how science content is sequenced and integrated in the intended curriculum. Document analysis within a qualitative
approach has been followed to conduct this study. Both junior secondary science curriculum and textbooks have been analyzed to address
the research questions. This study finds that the current science curriculum at the junior secondary level is not well-organized in terms
of sequencing and integration. No principle of sequencing content is followed in most cases. It is noted that in the case of intergrades
vertical sequencing, “spiral sequencing” is partially followed in a few cases. This study also finds that the current science curriculum
does not integrate the content adequately. Intradisciplinary integration, i.e. integrating different subdisciplines of science, has been tried
but the level of integration is not adequate rather it is very low. This study recommends that curriculum developers make efforts to make
the content better organized in both curriculum and textbooks by following the principles of sequencing and integration.
KEY WORDS: science curriculum; curriculum content; organization of content; sequence; integration
C
foundation for pursuing science education at a higher level”
ontent is one of the four main elements of a
(p. 25, translated by authors). It is clearly evident that the
curriculum along with objectives, methods, and
curriculum aims at preparing students for higher study to
evaluation. Organization of content in the curriculum
become science professionals. One the other hand, the
is considered very important to achieve the stated goals and
curriculum also set objectives such as:
objectives of curriculum (Edith Cowan University, 2001) and
• To acquire necessary life skills and attitude for ensuring
it should be done in a manner that content does not seem to be
personal and social security and for overcoming adverse
segmented (Ehsan, 1997). Links ought to be established across
life situation by practicing science
learning areas whenever it is possible and practicable to do
• To become scientifically tempered, rational, and free of
so as the University of Alabama’s Center for Communication
superstitions (NCTB, 2012. p. 26, translated by authors).
and Educational Technology asserts that this approach makes
a positive impact on the achievement of students (Alberta These objectives suggest that the curriculum also aimed at
Education, 2007). In a similar way, the Education Bureau developing scientifically literate citizens. Therefore, it can be
of Hong Kong (2016) has highlighted the importance of said that the current junior secondary science curriculum has
appropriate and logically sequenced content and has described tried to balance the two competing aims of science education.
it as one of the important aspects of effective and successful
Scientifically literate students are expected to grasp the broad
learning. Malamed (2016) and Friedlander (2014) both
integrating ideas of science that are necessary to understand
asserted that a meaningful logical sequence helps students to
and explain the scientific phenomena (organization for
comprehend and retain the content better.
economic cooperation and development [OECD], 2003).
Fensham (1985) argued that two competing aims of science However, our experience suggests that students in Bangladesh
education are dominant in science curricula; they are preparing have a discrete understanding of nature and natural phenomena.
specialist manpower and scientifically literate citizenry. In For example, we have seen that undergraduate science students
Bangladesh, a new curriculum was finalized in 2012 and have an excellent understanding of the biological process
implemented in 2013. The junior secondary science curriculum involved in the digestion of the consumed food, but they fail
(i.e. Grades six-eight) aimed at “familiarizing students with to explain chemical process involved in producing energy
modern concepts of science and scientific process to educate in our body. Then the questions arise: Why do students fail
them with advanced science education (National Curriculum to have an integrated and holistic understanding of science
and Textbook Board [NCTB], 2012. p. 25, translated by concepts? Is it anyway linked with how science content is
organized in the curriculum? With these questions in our mind University, 2001). Organization of content (architectonics) in
we explored the organization of content in the existing junior a curriculum is an important part of any curriculum. The two
secondary science curriculum of Bangladesh. According to most important aspects of organization of content in curriculum
Ehsan (1997), after implementing a new curriculum, it needs are (Print, 1993; Ehsan, 1997):
to be reviewed, analyzed, and evaluated. Curriculum analysis • Sequence of curriculum content
and review is one key to improving the quality of education as • Scope of curriculum content.
it sets the groundwork for the further development by analyzing
the current situation (National Council for Curriculum and Sequence of Curriculum Contents
Assessment, 2005). At present, it has been planned that the Ehsan (1997) referred to the sequence of curriculum as the
curriculum will be revised to include the junior secondary vertical organization of content. Print (1993) and Edith Cowan
grades of six, seven, and eight in the compulsory primary University (2001) defined the sequence as the order in which
education. This study aims to inform curriculum authority, content is presented to learners. Conventionally, it has been
curriculum developers, textbook writers, secondary science preferable that content should be sequenced by following
teachers, and other stakeholders about the organization logical approach (Edith Cowan University, 2001). The
of content in junior secondary science curriculum so that principles of sequencing content described by Print (1993 as
necessary actions can be taken for improving organization of cited in Edith Cowan University, 2001) are: Simple to complex,
content in the future curriculum. prerequisite learning, whole to part, and chronology. These four
principles have become increasingly acceptable as the criteria
This article reports partial findings of a larger study. The purpose
for sequencing contents.
of the larger study was to explore the organization of contents
in current junior secondary science curriculum of Bangladesh. If the sequence of content involves revisiting key concepts
Specifically, the study aimed to find out how science contents multiple times for further development of the concepts, it
are sequenced and integrated in intended curriculum as well is called spiral sequencing (Figure 1). Spiral sequencing is
as to explore how teacher’s classroom practice is influenced based on Bruner’s (1960) learning theory (Johnston, 2012;
by their views and understanding on different aspects of Rhalmi, 2011).
organization of contents. However, considering the word
Based on Bruner’s (1960) work, Johnston (2012) described the
limit for the article, we present the answers of two research
following three key features of spiral sequencing:
questions that focus on the organization of science content in
1. The student revisits a topic, theme, or subject several
the intended curriculum. The research questions are:
times throughout their school career.
1. How is science content sequenced in the intended junior
2. The complexity of the topic or theme increases with each
secondary curriculum?
revisit.
2. How is science content integrated within the discipline
and with other disciplines? 3. New learning has a relationship with old learning
and is put in context with the old information.
Intended curriculum in this study includes curriculum
document and science textbooks for grade six, grade seven, Scope of Curriculum Content
and grade eight published by the NCTB. The term scope refers to the breadth and depth of content within
the curriculum at any one time. Sometimes scope is referred
to as horizontal organization or “integration” (Edith Cowan
LITERATURE REVIEW University, 2001; based on Print, 1993). Print (1993) refers
We can consider that curriculum has three main forms, tiers to integration as one of the guiding concepts that is helpful
or levels – intended, implemented, and attained curriculum. in determining scope. In this study, only integration has been
The formal intended curriculum is the most common idea of studied as the scope of curriculum contents.
curriculum and it comprises the formal statements of rationale,
aims, intended list of content or concepts to be known, or Integration can generally be defined as a curriculum approach
competencies or skills to be mastered in programs of study and that purposefully draws together knowledge, skills, attitudes,
demonstrated in assessment (Gilbert, 2012). The intended or and values from within or across subject areas to develop a
specified curriculum has a focus on the aims and concepts of more powerful understanding of key ideas (Alberta Education,
what is to be taught, that is, the curriculum which is planned 2007). The New Zealand Ministry of Education (Fraser, 2010)
and expressed through the curriculum framework and other describes integration as a broad education that makes links
formal documents (Gilbert, 2012). According to Porter and within and across learning areas. In its simplest conception,
Smithson (2001), the intended curriculum refers to such policy integration is about making connections (Drake and Burns,
tools as curriculum standards, frameworks, or guidelines that 2004). Curriculum integration can be of different types and
outline what teachers are expected to deliver. approaches. It is shown in the following continuum (Figure 2).
As stated, content is one of the four main elements of a Alberta Education (2007) and Drake and Burns (2004)
curriculum along with objectives, methods, and evaluation describe intradisciplinary and multidisciplinary integration
(Nicholls and Nicholls, 1988, as cited in Edith Cowan as following.
Figure 1: A curriculum concept spiral from the Manhattanville Music Curriculum Project (Edith Cowan University, 2001. p. 70-71)
Figure 2: Curriculum integration continuum (Manitoba Education and Training, 1997 as cited in Alberta Education, 2007)
with the principle “whole to part,” the atom is discussed as a From Table 5, it is clear that even chapters that belong to same
whole and later the electron is discussed in detail. However, subdiscipline of science were discrete from each other in most
this sequencing is not reflected in the entire chapter. cases. For example, at grade seven there are five chapters
on biology; these chapters are not linked to each other as
Most of the Chapters within a Grade are Discrete from illustrated in Table 6.
Each Other and No Pattern of Sequencing Them is Found
In the document analysis, this study tried to uncover if there Each of the above-mentioned chapters has a different focus
was any pattern of sequence among the chapters within a grade. (theme). There is no direct linking among them nor do they
The junior secondary science curriculum included content from present a holistic view of the living world. As a result, no
biological science, physical science (physics and chemistry), pattern of sequence among these chapters was found.
earth and space science, and environmental science. Some Sometimes Principles are Followed and Sometimes They
sort of a general pattern was found in the science curriculum are Not when Sequencing Contents Vertically from one
and textbooks. Chapters on biological science were placed Grade to Another (Intergrades Sequence)
at the beginning, chapters on physical science (physics and Sometimes principles of sequencing content described by
chemistry) were in the middle and then at the end, chapter(s) Print (1993 as cited in Edith Cowan University, 2001) were
on environmental science was included. Other than this, no followed in intergrade vertical sequence in the explored parts
pattern of sequencing the chapters within a grade was found of the junior secondary science curriculum while sometimes
and most the chapters seemed to be discrete from each other. none of these principles were followed. In the cases presented
Table 5 presents the detailed analysis on sequencing among in Table 7, some of the principles were followed and so the
the chapters of the Science curriculum of grade eight. sequence seems logical.
For example, “morphology of plants” is included in both “Spiral Sequencing” is Followed in a Few Cases but Only
grades six and seven textbooks. In the grade six textbook, Partially
morphology, i.e., different parts (root, stems, and leaves) of Intergrade vertical sequence was not spirally sequenced in
an ideal flowering plant are presented and discussed in detail. most cases in the explored parts of the junior secondary science
On the other hand, various types of modification of different curriculum. “Spiral sequencing” was followed in a few cases
parts (root, stems, and leaves) of a plant are presented in but only partially. As mentioned earlier, spiral sequencing
the grade seven textbook. The content of grade seven are involves revisiting key concepts multiple times and using
comparatively more complex than that of grade six. Hence, learning from the previous grades as the base for further
the principle of “simple to complex” was followed from one development of the concepts. None of the explored parts was
grade to the next. In the cases presented in the Table 8, none truly spirally sequenced as none of them have affirmative
of the principles were found and so the sequence does not responses against all of the KQs of spiral sequencing mentioned
seem logical. in the methodology. Some of them are only partially spiral
For example, in the curriculum photosynthesis (5th chapter), sequenced (as they have affirmative responses against some
respiration (4th chapter) and diffusion, osmosis, and absorption of the KQs) while some of them are not spirally sequenced at
(3rd chapter) are included in grade six, grade seven, and grade all (as they have negative responses against most of the KQs).
eight, respectively. This sequence does not look logical as The status of the explored parts of the curriculum in terms of
absorption of water and minerals takes place and they are spiral sequencing is shown in Table 10.
transported to leaves first; then photosynthesis happens;
Let us consider an example, “food and nutrition” as a concept
finally, using the food produced in the photosynthesis energy
is included in grade six and grade eight. The responses against
is produced in the respiration process. Therefore, it would
the KQs of spiral sequencing are shown in Table 11.
be more logical if the content was sequenced by following
“chronology” principle; see Table 9 for what this sequence Hence, it was found that “food and nutrition” has affirmative
could be like. responses against KQs 1 and 4 and negative response against
2 and 3. Hence, it was considered as only partially spiral social science, humanities, mathematics, and language, was
sequenced. not included in any of the chapters explored in this study.
The position of each chapter investigated in the integration
On the other hand, for example “energy” as a concept is
analytical rubric is showed in the Table 13.
included in grade six and grade seven. In grade six, energy
is included in the chapters named “let us know motion” and It is clear from the Table 13 that most of the chapters
“force and simple machines”, and in grade seven there is a (8 chapters in total) belong at level-3 of the analytical
chapter named “use of energy.” In this case, the responses rubric which indicates integrating multiple subdisciplines
against the KQs of spiral sequencing are shown in Table 12. of science but not adequately. For example in the chapter
“lower organisms” (grade seven, 1st chapter), it tried to link
Therefore, it was found that “energy” as a concept has negative
microbiology with a number of various subdisciplines of
responses against KQs 2, 3, and 4, so it was considered as not
science such as health science (role of virus and bacteria as
spirally sequenced.
pathogen for various diseases), agriculture (role of bacteria in
Integration among multiple subdisciplines of science has been nitrogen fixation), environmental science (role of bacteria in
tried but level of integration is not adequate rather very low decomposing dead bodies and organic waste), etc. However,
and integrating science with other disciplines is not found in all of these were only mentioned in the textbook; none of the
any of the chapters. links were explored sufficiently. There was scope for doing
so as it would have helped the students to understand more
As mentioned earlier, “integration” refers to a curriculum
comprehensively. Integration within this chapter seemed to
approach that purposefully draws together knowledge, skills,
be superficial and not adequate; so it was placed at level 3 on
attitudes, and values from within or across subject areas to
the analytical rubric.
develop a more powerful understanding of key ideas (Alberta
Education, 2007). Intradisciplinary and multidisciplinary Some of the chapters (4 chapters in total) were assessed at
approaches of curriculum integration in the junior secondary level-2 of the analytical rubric which indicated being confined
science curriculum were explored in this study. In most of to one subdiscipline of science. For example, the chapter
the chapters examined from the junior secondary science named “chemical reaction” (grade eight, 8th chapter) was
curriculum and textbooks, it is found that linking among confined to chemistry only; the chapter never went beyond
multiple subdisciplines of science was tried but the level the topic of chemistry.
of integration is not adequate rather it was very low (which Rest four chapters were assessed at level-4 of the analytical
indicates level 3 of analytical rubric). As for the other rubric which meant integrating/linking among multiple
chapters, either they are confined to one subdiscipline of subdisciplines of science and the level of integration was
science (level 2) or involve integrating/linking among multiple adequate. For example in the chapter named “respiration,”
subdisciplines of science adequately (level 4). It was found zoology and botany were integrated when respiration in
that linking/integrating science with other disciplines such as living world was discussed. Similarly, zoology and health
science were integrated when common diseases of the
Table 9: Probable vertical sequence of content if respiratory tract were discussed. All of the mentioned content
“chronology” was followed as the principle and links among the different subdisciplines of science
were discussed thoroughly. Integration within this chapter
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 seemed to be adequate; so it was placed at level 4 on the
Diffusion, osmosis, and absorption Photosynthesis Respiration analytical rubric.
Table 11: Response against KQs in case of “food and Table 13: Position of different chapters in the integration
nutrition” analytical rubric
No Key question Response (in the case Grade Name of the chapter Position
of food and nutrition) in the
KQ‑1 Does the concept appear in multiple Yes integration
grades (within junior secondary analytical
grade)? rubric
KQ‑2 Has the learning from previous No Six Living world (2nd chapter) Level 3
grade (s) on the same concept been Morphology of plants (4th chapter) Level 3
referred in the textbook?
Photosynthesis (5th chapter) Level 4
KQ‑3 Has the learning from previous No
Food and nutrition (13th chapter) Level 4
grade (s) on the same concept been
used as the base of future learning? Seven Lower organisms (1st chapter) Level 3
KQ‑4 Have the breadth and complexity of Yes External morphology of plant (3rd chapter) Level 2
the concept been increased from the Respiration (4th chapter) Level 4
previous grade? Digestive system and blood circulation Level 2
KQ: Key question system (5th chapter)
Use of energy (7th chapter) Level 3
Change in surrounding and various Level 3
Table 12: Response against KQs in case of “energy” incidents (11th chapter)
Eight Classification of animal kingdom (1st chapter) Level 2
No Key question Response (in the
Diffusion, osmosis and absorption (3rd chapter) Level 3
case of energy)
Coordination and secretion (5th chapter) Level 3
KQ‑1 Does the concept appear in multiple Yes
grades (within junior secondary grade)? The structures of atoms (6th chapter) Level 3
KQ‑2 Has the learning from previous grade (s) No Chemical reaction (8th chapter) Level 2
on the same concept been referred in the Food and nutrition (13th chapter) Level 4
textbook?
KQ‑3 Has the learning from previous grade (s) No
on the same concept been used as the base DISCUSSION
of future learning?
KQ‑4 Have the breadth and complexity of the No
This study found that in most cases no principle of sequencing
concept been increased from the previous content as described by Print (1993) was followed within a
grade? chapter in the explored parts of the junior secondary science
KQ: Key question curriculum. In only a few cases were some of the principles
followed or partially followed. It was noted, any pattern of
As noted earlier the linking or integrating of science with other sequencing the chapters within a grade was minimal as most the
disciplines such as social science, humanities, mathematics, chapters seemed to be discrete from each other. In the case of
and language, was not included in any of the chapters explored intergrade vertical sequencing, some principles of sequencing
in this study. Nevertheless, there was scope for this type of content as described by Print (1993) were followed while in
integration (multidisciplinary) in some cases. For example, some cases none of them is followed. “Spiral sequencing” was
the importance of donating blood (humanities and a social attempted in only in a few cases. Therefore, it could be said
responsibility-related issue) could have been included in the that the science content in the junior secondary curriculum
chapter “digestive system and blood circulation system” and was not well sequenced.
the misuse of atoms and isotopes as weapons (humanities and Research literature acknowledges the importance of well-
a social responsibility-related issue) could have been included sequenced content and puts emphasis on this. Edith Cowan
in the chapter “the structure of atom.” University (2001) described the principles described by Print
Integration Continuum (1993) as “logical approach” and “increasingly acceptable
From Table 13, it is clear that most of the chapters belong criteria for sequencing content.” The Education Bureau of Hong
at level 3 of the analytical rubric while only few of them Kong (2016) emphasized an appropriate and logical sequence
belonging to level 4 or level 2. Hence, the current junior of content and has described it as one of the important aspects
secondary science curriculum could be placed on the of effective and successful learning. According to Malamed
continuum “discrete factual content” to “completely integrated (2016) and Friedlander (2014) a meaningful logical sequence
content” as seen in Figure 6. helps students to comprehend and retain the content better.
According to Johnston (2012) spiral sequencing is beneficial as
The current junior secondary curriculum was placed almost knowledge is reinforced and solidified each time the students
at the middle (a little bit closer to the discrete factual content revisit the subject matter, it allows logical progression from
end) of the continuum because it does not reflect complete simplistic ideas to complicated ideas, involves activating prior
integration. knowledge, or building new learning on prior learning. He
Figure 6: Position of current junior secondary science curriculum on a Discrete factual content - Completely integrated content continuum
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and curriculum Review Phase 1. Dublin: NCCA.
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Boston: National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB). (2012). National
Pearson Education Inc. Curriculum 2012-Secondary Science (in Bengali). Dhaka: NCTB.
Edith Cowan University. (2001). Curriculum Theory and Practice- National Curriculum Board. (2009). Shape of the Australian Curriculum:
Unit Notes (Based on Materials Originally Developed by Professor Science. Melbourne: National Curriculum Board.
Murray Print). Perth: Edith Cowan University. Nicholls, A., & Nicholls, S.H. (1978). Developing a Curriculum: A Practical
Education Bureau-The government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Guide. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Region. (2016). Guiding Principles for Quality Textbooks. Hong Kong: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (2003).
Education Bureau. Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow: Further Results from PISA
Ehsan, M.A. (1997). Curriculum Development: Principle and Method. 2000. Paris: OECD.
Dhaka: Chatrabondhu Library. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed.
Fensham, P.J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of
Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415-435.
Porter, A.C., & Smithson, J.L. (2001). Defining, Developing and Using
Fraser, D. (2010). Curriculum Integration. Wellington: New Zealand
Curriculum Indicators. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research
Council for Educational Research.
in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Friedlander, J. (2014). Sequencing Contents. Memphis: Southwest Tennessee
Community College. Print, M. (1993). Curriculum Development and Design. 2nd ed. St. Leonards:
Gilbert, R. (2012). Curriculum Planning in a Context of Change: A Literature Allen & Unwin.
Review. New Zealand: Victoria University Wellington, Department of Rhalmi, M. (2011). Implication of Bruner’s Learning Theory on
Education and Early Childhood Development. Teaching. Available from: http://www.myenglishpages.com/articles_
Johnston, H. (2012). The Spiral Curriculum. Florida: Education Partnerships, learningtheories. [Last accessed on 2017 Jun 19].
Inc. Available from: https://www.eric.ed.gov/?id=ED538282. [Last Siddique, M.N.A. (2007). Existing and Proposed Science Curricula of
accessed on 2017 Jun 19]. Grades IX-X. In: Bangladesh: A Comparative Study. (Master’s Thesis,
Malamed, C. (2016). 10 Ways to Organize Instructional Contents. Available Faculty of Education, Monash University.
from: http://www.theelearningcoach.com/elearning_design/how-to- The Curriculum Development Council. (2002). Science Education-Key
organize-content. [Last accessed on 2017 Jun 19]. Learning Area Curriculum Guide (Primary 1-Secondary 3). Kowloon:
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2005). Primary Education Department.