Gum Content in Fuels by Jet Evaporation: Standard Test Method For
Gum Content in Fuels by Jet Evaporation: Standard Test Method For
Gum Content in Fuels by Jet Evaporation: Standard Test Method For
1 2
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Petroleum Products and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
D02.14 on Stability and Cleanliness of Liquid Fuels. Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
Current edition approved April 15, 2012. Published May 2012. Originally the ASTM website.
3
approved in 1934. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as D381–09. DOI: Available from Energy Institute, 61 New Cavendish St., London, WIG 7AR,
10.1520/D0381-12. U.K.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
flow of steam (see Table 1). For aviation gasoline and aviation
turbine fuel, the resulting residue is weighed and reported as
milligrams per 100 mL. For motor gasoline, the residue is
weighed before and after extracting with heptane and the
results reported as milligrams per 100 mL.
NOTE 1—Specification D1655 allows the existent gum of aviation
turbine fuels to be determined by either Test Method D381 or IP 540, with
Test Method D381 identified as the referee test method. Test Method D381 FIG. 1 Apparatus for Determining Gum Content by Jet
specifically requires the use of steam as the evaporating medium for Evaporation
aviation turbine fuels, whereas IP 540 allows either air or steam as the
evaporating medium for aviation turbine fuels.
conforming to Test Method D381 – 94, or earlier, are suitable.)
5. Significance and Use The bath should have wells and jets for two or more beakers.
5.1 The true significance of this test method for determining The rate of flow from each outlet when fitted with the conical
gum in motor gasoline is not firmly established. It has been adapters with 500 to 600 micron copper or stainless steel
proved that high gum can cause induction-system deposits and screens should not differ from 1000 mL/s by more than 15 %.
sticking of intake valves, and in most instances, it can be A liquid bath, if used, shall be filled to within 25 mm of the top
assumed that low gum will ensure absence of induction-system with a suitable liquid. Temperature shall be maintained by
difficulties. The user should, however, realize that the test means of thermostatic controls or by refluxing liquids of
--``,`,,,,,,`,```,``,,,`,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
placed with the bulb or sensor tip resting on the bottom of the water that has been previously weighed. Exhaust the steam into
beaker in the well. Do not use any well having a recorded the cylinder for approximately 60 s. Adjust the position of the
temperature outside the range from 150 to 160°C. cylinder so that the end of the copper tube is immersed in the
water to a depth of less than 50 mm to prevent excessive back
9. Assembly of Steam-Jet Apparatus pressure. After the appropriate time has elapsed, remove the
9.1 Assemble the steam-jet apparatus as shown in Fig. 1. copper tube from the cylinder and weigh the cylinder. The gain
(Warning—The sample and solvent vapors evaporated during in mass represents the amount of steam condensed. Calculate
the performance of this test procedure can be extremely the steam rate (mL/s) as follows:
flammable or combustible and hazardous from the inhalation R 5 ~M 2 m!1000/kt (1)
standpoint. The evaporation bath must be provided with an
effective exhaust hood to control such vapors and reduce the where:
risk of thermal explosion.) R = steam rate (mL/s),
9.2 To place the apparatus in operation, apply heat to the M = mass of graduated cylinder with condensed steam, g,
bath. When the temperature reaches 232°C, slowly introduce m = mass of graduated cylinder and ice, g,
k = mass of 1000 mL of steam at 232°C at atmospheric
dry steam into the system until a rate of 1000 6 150 mL/s for
pressure = 0.434 g, and
each outlet is reached (see 10.2). Regulate the temperature of
t = condensing time, s.
the bath to a range from 232 to 246°C to provide a well
temperature of 232 6 3°C. Measure the temperature with the
11. Procedure
temperature sensor, placed resting on the bottom of a beaker in
one of the bath wells with the conical adapter in place. Any 11.1 Wash the beakers, including the tare, with the gum
well having a temperature that differs by more than 3°C from solvent until free of gum. Rinse thoroughly with water and
232°C is not suitable for standard tests. immerse in a mildly alkaline or neutral pH laboratory detergent
cleaning solution.
10. Calibration and Standardization 11.1.1 The type of detergent and conditions for its use need
10.1 Air Flow: to be established in each laboratory. The criterion for satisfac-
10.1.1 Verify or calibrate the air flow to ensure all outlets tory cleaning shall be a matching of the quality of that obtained
meet the 600 6 90 mL/s air flow requirement as measured at with chromic acid cleaning solutions on used beakers (fresh
room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Refer to the chromic acid, 6-h soaking period, rinsing with distilled water
instrument manufacturer instructions for specific guidance on and drying). For this comparison visual appearance and mass
performing the air flow calibration procedure. Note the setting loss on heating the glassware under test conditions may be
of the flow indicator device for use with air and use this setting used. Detergent cleaning avoids the potential hazards and
for subsequent tests. inconveniences related to handling corrosive chromic acid
10.1.1.1 One way to calibrate the air flow is to use a solutions. The latter remains as the reference cleaning practice
calibrated flow indicator device, such as a flowmeter, separate and as such may function as an alternate to the preferred
from the device specified in 6.5, to check the air flow rate at procedure-cleaning with detergent solutions.
each outlet directly at room temperature and atmospheric 11.1.2 Remove the beakers from the cleaning solution by
pressure. To obtain accurate results, ensure that the back means of stainless steel forceps or tongs (see 6.10) and handle
pressure of the flowmeter is less than 1 kPa. only with forceps or tongs thereafter. Wash the beakers
10.1.1.2 Alternatively, another way to calibrate the air flow thoroughly, first with tap water and then with distilled water,
is to measure and adjust as appropriate the total air flow rate and dry in an oven at 150°C for at least 1 h. Cool the beakers
(mL/s) supplied to the outlets. The total air flow rate equals the for at least 2 h in the cooling vessel placed in the vicinity of the
expected air flow rate at each outlet times the number or outlet balance.
accordance with Practice E29 or Appendix E of IP Standard material would, in the long run, in the normal and correct
Methods for Analysis and Testing of Petroleum and Related operation of the test method, exceed the values below only in
Products. For results <1 mg/100 mL, report as “<1 mg/100 one case in twenty.
mL.” r 5 1.11 1 0.095x for existent gum ~aviation gasoline!, (5)
13.2 For non-aviation fuels with either solvent washed or
unwashed gum content values $0.5 mg/100 mL, express the r 5 0.5882 1 0.2490x for existent gum
~aviation turbine fuel!, (6)
results to the nearest 0.5 mg/100 mL as either solvent washed
0.4
gum or unwashed gum content, or both, by Test Method D381. r 5 0.997x for unwashed gum content ~unwashed!, and (7)
Round figures in accordance with Practice E29 or Appendix E r 5 1.298x 0.3
for solvent washed gum content ~washed! (8)
of IP Standard Methods for Analysis and Testing of Petroleum
and Related Products. For results <0.5 mg/100 mL, report as where: x is the average of the results being compared.
“<0.5 mg/100 mL.” If the unwashed gum content is <0.5 14.1.2 Reproducibility—The difference between two test
mg/100 mL, the washed gum may also be reported as “<0.5 results independently obtained by different operators operating
mg/100 mL” (see 11.8). in different laboratories on nominally identical test material
13.3 For all fuels, if the filtration step (see 11.4) has been would, in the long run, in the normal and correct operation of
carried out before evaporation, the expression filtered shall the test method, exceed the values below only in one case in
follow the numerical value. twenty:
14. Precision and Bias 4 R 5 2.09 1 0.126x for existent gum ~aviation gasoline!, (9)
14.1 The precision, as obtained by statistical examination of R 5 2.941 1 0.2794x for existent gum
interlaboratory test results, is given in 14.1.1 and 14.1.2, and ~aviation turbine fuel!, (10)
illustrated graphically in Fig. 2. Analysis details are in the R 5 1.928xˆ 0.4 for unwashed gum content (11)
research report. R 5 2.494xˆ 0.3 for solvent washed gum content (12)
14.1.1 Repeatability—The difference between successive
test results, obtained by the same operator with the same where: x is the average of the results being compared.
apparatus under constant operating conditions on identical test NOTE 7—The precision values given above for solvent washed and
unwashed gum content were obtained on fourteen (14) finished motor
gasolines, which included two samples containing 10 volume % ethanol
4
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may and five (5) samples containing 15 volume % methyl tertiary butyl ether
be obtained by requesting Research Report RR:D02-1466. (MTBE), as well as deposit control additives as determined in a 1997
--``,`,,,,,,`,```,``,,,`,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Subcommittee D02.14 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue
(D381–09) that may impact the use of this standard.
(1) Added mercury caveat to 1.4 in the Scope. (2) Updated terminology in Section 3.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the ASTM website (www.astm.org/
COPYRIGHT/).
--``,`,,,,,,`,```,``,,,`,,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---